LABGENE CONTAINMENT FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS
|
|
- Sophia Hudson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 LABGENE CONTAINMENT FAILURE S AND ANALYSIS F. B. NATACCI Centro Tecnológico da Marinha em São Paulo São Paulo, Brasil Abstract Nuclear power plant containment performance is an important issue to be focused when developing an extended Level 1 Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA). The main reason for this resides on the fact that the containment plays a fundamental role on accidental sequences since it is the most relevant barrier on the mitigation of consequences of postulated severe accidents. LABGENE is a prototype nuclear power plant. This paper presents a first approach of the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) for the LABGENE containment, identifying possible failures and the associated causes that can compromise containment performance. The initial plant damage states, which are the input for this analysis, are based on the event trees developed for LABGENE Level 1 PSA. It should be emphasized that this is a preliminary study in accordance with the state of the art of the corresponding PSA and is subjected to further completion. The evaluation of the qualitative analysis presented herein allows a concise and broad knowledge of the development of accidental sequences related to the LABGENE containment. 1. INTRODUCTION The main objective of the whole PSA together with the containment reliability analysis is to complement the well known deterministic accident analysis in order to assure the safe operation of a nuclear facility in a degree as high as possibly achievable. As stated in reference [1], PSA can be developed in three distinct levels. Level 1 PSA focuses evaluation for identification of all possible scenarios that can lead to reactor core damage. The plant damage states of the accidental sequences identified in Level 1 together with the containment response define the scope of Level 2 PSA which lead to the determination of the source terms and the containment release frequencies. The focus of Level 3 PSA is to evaluate off-site plant consequences and calculate public risks based on the results of Level 2 PSA and on mitigating measures. Level 3 PSA is also used to delineate emergency response planning. This paper relates to a first approach of the evaluation of the LABGENE containment performance which is the link between Level 1 and Level 2 PSA. Brief descriptions of the plant and of the containment are presented in section 2. Section 3 contains a condensed FMEA of the containment. Section 4 brings up some final considerations based on what was identified during the development of the analysis. 2. LABGENE DESCRIPTION The LABGENE plant is an experimental prototype pressurized water reactor (PWR) with the main purpose of being a training facility in order to gain operating experience as well as to acquire plant specific data. After consolidation, a similar plant is intended to be used for submarine propulsion. It is a two-loop PWR with a thermal power capacity of approximately 48 MWth. Each loop has a steam generator which produces steam that is directed to four turbines: two propulsion turbogenerators and two auxiliary turbogenerators. The propulsion turbogenerators drive an electric motor which drives a shaft with a hydraulic brake intended to simulate a marine propulsion. The auxiliary turbogenerators provide electrical F. B. NATACCI 1
2 power to the plant. The ultimate heat sink at LABGENE is a shielding pool which simulates a very large water source. The reactor core consists of twenty-one fuel assemblies. These assemblies contain fuel rods, control and safety rods, and burnable poison rods. The fuel rods contain uranium dioxide enriched at about 5% and are cladded by stainless steel. The burnable poison helps control reactivity because the LABGENE reactor coolant is not borated. Different from other pressurized water reactors, control rods in LABGENE are used to control reactivity. During normal operation, the safety rods are completely withdrawn from core and are used only to shutdown, along with the control rods LABGENE containment The LABGENE plant has basically the same barriers as in other nuclear facilities against any possible release of radioactive fission products from core to the environment, namely: the fuel matrix; the fuel cladding; coolant pressure boundary which includes vessel; and the containment. The LABGENE containment is composed of the containment itself, the shielding pool,, and other specific s and devices important to allow the correct operation of the containment and the plant as a whole, in order to avoid radiation release to the environment. This concept of the containment differs from conventional reactor containments because in LABGENE design there is the need of having a special structure to simulate the hull of a submarine. Figure 1 shows schematically the LABGENE components important for the containment analysis [2]. Figure 1. General arrangement of the LABGENE containment The containment comprises the containment barrier and its internal environment. The containment barrier is a metallic cylindrical structure assembled inside which is intended to behave as a submarine hull and house all equivalent equipment. The F. B. NATACCI 2
3 main functions of the containment are: to shelter equipment and s of the primary circuit, protecting them from external hazards; to withstand pressure peaks caused by any of the postulated design accidents, specially large loss of coolant accidents; to collect, retain and provide controlled release of any radioactive material; and to provide means to monitor the containment environment. The shielding pool is a water tank that surrounds the containment and serves as a radiation shielding, complementing all other shielding barriers such as the shielding tank installed around. It is also the ultimate heat sink for the plant, supplying water to the emergency cooling for residual heat removal. The is a seismic concrete structure. Its main functions are: to withstand external natural and technological events such as earthquakes, explosions and external missiles, protecting the containment and the integrity of all components inside it; and to provide a secondary confinement to fission products, allowing a controlled radioactive release to the environment, if necessary. Other specific s and devices related to the containment comprise mainly the gas detection and control, the radiation monitoring, the containment parameter monitoring, the ventilation and air conditioning, the detection and firefighting, the containment isolation and the leakage detection. The internal containment environment is monitored and parameters such as pressure, temperature, fluid level, humidity, radiation, hydrogen concentration and noise are some of the most important ones which are constantly monitored. 3. LABGENE CONTAINMENT FAILURE S AND ANALYSIS The technique used for the first approach of LABGENE containment qualitative reliability analysis was the failure modes and effects analysis - FMEA [3]. This analysis is summarized in Table 1. Table 1. LABGENE containment FMEA FAILURE Containment isolation failure (including process piping, ventilation, electrical cables and instrumentation penetrations, and access hatches) Failure to isolate or inadvertent opening of containment penetrations in case of accident Interface loss of coolant accident outside the containment High radioactivity Process parameter reactor coolant High radioactivity release from primary to secondary confinement release from the primary coolant to the secondary confinement Remote isolation by the operator, when possible Secondary confinement and ventilation F. B. NATACCI 3
4 FAILURE Steam generator tube rupture Process parameter reactor coolant Plant shutdown and radioactive contamination of the secondary Residual heat removal by the emergency cooling Containment rupture External causes, such as earthquakes, tornadoes, structural failures, flooding, external missiles, external fires and external explosions. Containment or structural failure is considered. The simultaneous failure of the core and the reactor vessel is postulated Overpressure and high temperature due to direct containment heating immediately after high pressure ejection of melted core debris. This can occur when vessel ruptures and the melted core is instantaneously atomized, reacting with oxygen and steam, releasing a high amount of chemical energy High radioactivity secondary Visual detection by the operator, together with several process alarms, including high radioactivity alarm High radioactivity, release to the external environment release to the secondary confinement Reactor failure can occur, with the consequent radioactive release to the external environment None Possible relief by the ventilation F. B. NATACCI 4
5 FAILURE Overpressure and high temperature due to hydrogen fire and/or explosion in the containment, due to vessel failure. In case of explosion, the containment can also rupture due to the impact of missiles Overpressure and /or missile impact due to vapor physical explosion, due to the direct contact of water with the melted core, inside or outside the reactor vessel, immediately after its failure Overpressure and/or missile impact due to reactor vessel structural failure (during normal operation) Overpressure due to noncondensable gas and vapor buildup in the containment Overpressure and/or high temperature due to uncontrolled fire in the containment or in High hydrogen concentration containment, and high radioactivity, High radioactivity, Gas detection and control Hydrogen recombiners None Regular tests and inspections of the reactor vessel integrity High pressure containment High temperature containment or in, identified by the detection and firefighting Possible relief by the ventilation Detection and firefighting, and possible relief by the ventilation F. B. NATACCI 5
6 FAILURE Overpressure, high /or missile impact in the containment due to catastrophic failure of vessel, when it is operated beyond design limits. This can occur in accidental sequences that lead to core damage, when the reactor coolant is still operating under high pressure Structural failure of vessel support, by erosion or melt through, due to direct attack of the containment, caused by core debris resultant from reactor vessel failure High radioactivity, None None 4. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS The FMEA of the containment led to the identification of two main failure modes, namely: containment isolation failure and containment rupture. As one can see, these failures result in undesirable effects, so, their causes, detection methods, and compensation measures have to be accurately studied. As it was already emphasized, the analysis presented herein is a first approach of the assessment of the LABGENE containment response, after the identification of plant damage states as a result of accidental sequences. Such sequences are determined in Level 1 PSA. Further development of Level 2 PSA requires the quantitative containment event tree analysis which embraces the response of all support s and devices available to ensure the correct operation of the containment. REFERENCES [1] Procedures for Conducting Probabilistic Safety Assessments of Nuclear Power Plants (Level 1) (IAEA Safety Series No. 50-P-4, Vienna, 1992). [2] GENPRO Engenharia, Prédio do Reator Sistema da Contenção Descrição do Sistema (Technical Report R MS-0001, São Paulo, 2011). [3] CTMSP, Análise de Modos de Falha e Efeitos e Árvores de Eventos do Sistema de Contenção (Technical Report R RA-06/00, São Paulo, 2001). F. B. NATACCI 6
Preliminary Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident for Advanced Nuclear Power Plant Technology Development
Preliminary Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident for Advanced Nuclear Power Plant Technology Development A. Introduction The IAEA Report on Reactor and Spent Fuel Safety in the Light of
More informationJoint ICTP-IAEA Essential Knowledge Workshop on Deterministic Safety Analysis and Engineering Aspects Important to Safety. Trieste,12-23 October 2015
Joint ICTP- Essential Knowledge Workshop on Deterministic Safety Analysis and Engineering Aspects Important to Safety Trieste,12-23 October 2015 Safety classification of structures, systems and components
More informationSafety Provisions for the KLT-40S Reactor Plant
6th INPRO Dialogue Forum on Global Nuclear Energy Sustainability: Licensing and Safety Issues for Small and Medium-sized Nuclear Power Reactors (SMRs) 29 July - 2 August 2013 IAEA Headquarters, Vienna,
More informationACR Safety Systems Safety Support Systems Safety Assessment
ACR Safety Systems Safety Support Systems Safety Assessment By Massimo Bonechi, Safety & Licensing Manager ACR Development Project Presented to US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor
More informationSafety criteria for design of nuclear power plants
FINNISH CENTRE FOR RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY YVL 1.0 12 January 1996 Safety criteria for design of nuclear power plants 1 General 3 2 Radiation safety 3 2.1 Limitation of worker radiation exposure 3
More informationHPR1000: ADVANCED PWR WITH ACTIVE AND PASSIVE SAFETY FEATURES
HPR1000: ADVANCED PWR WITH ACTIVE AND PASSIVE SAFETY FEATURES D. SONG China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd. Beijing, China Email: songdy@cnpe.cc J. XING China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd. Beijing,
More informationPOST-FUKUSHIMA STRESS TESTS OF EUROPEAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS CONTENTS AND FORMAT OF NATIONAL REPORTS
HLG_p(2011-16)_85 POST-FUKUSHIMA STRESS TESTS OF EUROPEAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS CONTENTS AND FORMAT OF NATIONAL REPORTS This document is intended to provide guidance for the European Nuclear Regulators
More informationCLASSIFICATION OF SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES AND COMPONENTS OF A NUCLEAR FACILITY
CLASSIFICATION OF SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES AND COMPONENTS OF A NUCLEAR FACILITY 1 Introduction 3 2 Scope of application 3 3 Classification requirements 3 3.1 Principles of safety classification 3 3.2 Classification
More informationApplication of Selected Safety Requirements from IAEA SSR-2/1 in the EC6 Reactor Design
Application of Selected Safety Requirements from IAEA SSR-2/1 in the EC6 Reactor Design Technical Meeting on Safety Challenges for New NPPs 22-25 June 2015, Vienna, Austria - Copyright - A world leader
More informationImplementation of SSR2/1 requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Design in Polish regulation.
Implementation of SSR2/1 requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Design in Polish regulation. Marek Jastrzębski Department of Nuclear Safety National Atomic Energy Agency (PAA) Technical Meeting on Safety
More informationNuclear Safety Standards Committee
Nuclear Safety Standards Committee 41 st Meeting, IAEA 21 23 Topical June, Issues 2016 Conference in Nuclear Installation Safety Agenda item Safety Demonstration of Advanced Water Cooled NPPs Title Workshop
More informationNuScale: Expanding the Possibilities for Nuclear Energy
NuScale: Expanding the Possibilities for Nuclear Energy D. T. Ingersoll Director, Research Collaborations Georgia Tech NE 50 th Anniversary Celebration November 1, 2012 NuScale Power, LLC 2012 Allowing
More informationOutline of New Safety Standard (Design Basis) (DRAFT) For Public Comment
Provisional Translation (Feb.13,2013 Rev.0) February 6, 2013 Outline of New Safety Standard (Design Basis) (DRAFT) For Public Comment 0 February 6, 2013 Outline of New Safety Standard (Design Basis) (DRAFT)
More informationArab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications, 48(3), ( ) 2015
Specific Considerations in the Safety Assessment of Predisposal Radioactive Waste Management Facilities in Light of the Lessons Learned from the Accident at the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant A.
More informationCAREM-25: a Low-Risk Nuclear Option. Rivera, S.S. and Barón, J.H.
CAREM-25: a Low-Risk Nuclear Option Rivera, S.S. and Barón, J.H. Presentado en: VI General Congress on Nuclear Energy VII CGEN Minascentro-Bello Horizonte, Brasil, 31 agosto al 3 setiembre 1999 CAREM-25:
More informationCAREM Prototype Construction and Licensing Status
IAEA-CN-164-5S01 CAREM Prototype Construction and Licensing Status H. Boado Magan a, D. F. Delmastro b, M. Markiewicz b, E. Lopasso b, F. Diez, M. Giménez b, A. Rauschert b, S. Halpert a, M. Chocrón c,
More informationInstrumentation and Control to Prevent and Mitigate Severe Accident Conditions
Instrumentation and Control to Prevent and Mitigate Severe Accident Conditions SAMG-D Toolkit, Module 3, Chapter 3 Martin Gajdoš Nuclear Engineering, Slovenské elektrárne IAEA Workshop on the Development
More informationCAREM: AN INNOVATIVE-INTEGRATED PWR
18th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 18) Beijing, China, August 7-12, 2005 SMiRT18-S01-2 CAREM: AN INNOVATIVE-INTEGRATED PWR Rubén MAZZI INVAP Nuclear Projects
More informationIntroduction to Level 2 PSA
Introduction to Level 2 PSA Dr Charles Shepherd Chief Consultant, Corporate Risk Associates CRA PSA/HFA FORUM 13-14 September 2012, Bristol Accident sequences modelled by the PSA INITIATING EVENTS SAFETY
More informationNaturally Safe HTGR in the response to the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident
IAEA Technical Meeting on on Re evaluation of Maximum Operating Temperatures and Accident Conditions for High Temperature Reactor Fuel and Structural Materials, 10 12 July 2012, Vienna, Austria Naturally
More informationConsiderations on the performance and reliability of passive safety systems for nuclear reactors
January 2016 Considerations on the performance and reliability of passive safety systems for nuclear reactors I. Background Pressurized water reactors currently operating in France are equipped with safety
More informationAP1000 The PWR Revisited
IAEA-CN-164-3S05 AP1000 The PWR Revisited Paolo Gaio Westinghouse Electric Company gaiop@westinghouse.com Abstract. For nearly two decades, Westinghouse has pursued an improved pressurized water reactor
More informationIAEA-TECDOC Probabilistic safety assessments of nuclear power plants for low power and shutdown modes
IAEA-TECDOC-1144 Probabilistic safety assessments of nuclear power plants for low power and shutdown modes March 2000 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Safety Assessment Section
More informationEnsuring a nuclear power plant s safety functions in provision for failures
FINNISH CENTRE FOR RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY YVL 2.7 20 May 1996 Ensuring a nuclear power plant s safety functions in provision for failures 1 General 3 2 General design principles 3 3 Application of
More informationPower Stations Nuclear power stations
Power Stations Nuclear power stations Introduction A nuclear power plant is a thermal power station in which the heat source is a nuclear reactor. The heat is used to generate steam which drives a steam
More informationNuclear Energy Revision Sheet
Nuclear Energy Revision Sheet Question I Identify the NPP parts by writing the number of the correct power plant part in the blank. Select your answers from the list provided below. 1 Reactor 2 Steam generator
More informationAssessing and Managing Severe Accidents in Nuclear Power Plant
Assessing and Managing Severe Accidents in Nuclear Power Plant Harri Tuomisto Fortum, Finland IAEA Technical Meeting on Managing the Unexpected - From the Perspective of the Interaction between Individuals,
More informationScenarios of Heavy Beyond-Design-Basis Accidents in HTGRs N.G. Kodochigov, Yu.P. Sukharev
Scenarios of Heavy Beyond-Design-Basis Accidents in HTGRs N.G. Kodochigov, Yu.P. Sukharev IAEA Technical Meeting on the Safety of High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactors in the Light of the Fukushima Daiichi
More informationSpecific Design Consideration of ACP100 for Application in the Middle East and North Africa Region
Specific Design Consideration of ACP100 for Application in the Middle East and North Africa Region IAEA Technical Meeting on Technology Assessment of Small Modular Reactors for Near Term Deployment 2 5
More informationSMART Standard Design Approval inspection result July. 4 th
SMART Standard Design Approval inspection result 2012. July. 4 th Content Ⅰ. Inspection outline. 1 Ⅱ. Inspection proceedings 2 Ⅲ. SMART Standard Design features. 3 Ⅳ. Standard Design inspection result
More informationSafety Implication for Gen-IV SFR based on the Lesson Learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPPs Accident. Ryodai NAKAI Japan Atomic Energy Agency
Safety Implication for Gen-IV SFR based on the Lesson Learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPPs Accident Ryodai NAKAI Japan Atomic Energy Agency Contents Introduction Japanese Government Report to the IAEA
More informationNuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level
Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level Safety of Nuclear Power Plants Overview of the Nuclear Safety Features on the Power Plant
More informationNuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level
Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level Safety of Nuclear Power Plants Overview of the Nuclear Safety Features on the Power Plant
More informationELFR The European Lead Fast Reactor DESIGN, SAFETY APPROACH AND SAFETY CHARACTERISTICS. Alessandro Alemberti
ELFR The European Lead Fast Reactor DESIGN, SAFETY APPROACH AND SAFETY CHARACTERISTICS Alessandro Alemberti Alessandro.Alemberti@ann.ansaldo.it TECHNICAL MEETING ON IMPACT OF FUKUSHIMA EVENT ON CURRENT
More informationSafety Design of HTGR by JAEA in the light of the Fukushima Daiichi accident
Technical Meeting on the Safety of High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactors in the Light of the Fukushima Daiichi Accident, 8-11 April 2014, IAEA Head quarters, Vienna, Austria Safety Design of HTGR by JAEA
More informationTHE FUKUSHIMA ACCIDENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR NUCLEAR SAFETY. Edwin Lyman Union of Concerned Scientists May 26, 2011
THE FUKUSHIMA ACCIDENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR NUCLEAR SAFETY Edwin Lyman Union of Concerned Scientists May 26, 2011 The accident: many unknowns Many of the details of the Fukushima Daiichi accident are still
More informationSwedish Radiation Safety Authority Regulatory Code
Swedish Radiation Safety Authority Regulatory Code ISSN 2000-0987 SSMFS 2008:17 The Swedish Radiation Safety Authority s regulations and general advice concerning the design and construction of nuclear
More informationAP1000 European 19. Probabilistic Risk Assessment Design Control Document
19.39 In-Vessel Retention of Molten Core Debris 19.39.1 Introduction In-vessel retention of molten core debris through water cooling of the external surface of the reactor vessel is a severe accident management
More informationConcepts and Features of ATMEA1 TM as the latest 1100 MWe-class 3-Loop PWR Plant
8 Concepts and Features of ATMEA1 TM as the latest 1100 MWe-class 3-Loop PWR Plant KOZO TABUCHI *1 MASAYUKI TAKEDA *2 KAZUO TANAKA *2 JUNICHI IMAIZUMI *2 TAKASHI KANAGAWA *3 ATMEA1 TM is a 3-loop 1100
More informationUse of PSA to Support the Safety Management of Nuclear Power Plants
S ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Use of PSA to Support the Safety Management of Nuclear Power Plants РР - 6/2010 ÀÃÅÍÖÈß ÇÀ ßÄÐÅÍÎ ÐÅÃÓËÈÐÀÍÅ BULGARIAN NUCLEAR REGULATORY AGENCY TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationDesign of Fuel Handling and Storage Systems for Nuclear Power Plants
IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS for protecting people and the environment Design of Fuel Handling and Storage Systems for Nuclear Power Plants STATUS: SPESS STEP 8a Submission to MS review Date 2017-06-30 DRAFT
More informationDesign of Traditional and Advanced CANDU Plants. Artur J. Faya Systems Engineering Division November 2003
Design of Traditional and Advanced CANDU Plants Artur J. Faya Systems Engineering Division November 2003 Overview Canadian Plants The CANDU Reactor CANDU 600 and ACR-700 Nuclear Steam Supply Systems Fuel
More informationENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS OF RUSSIAN DESIGN
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET) Volume 9, Issue 11, November 2018, pp. 172 176, Article ID: IJMET_09_11_019 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?jtype=ijmet&vtype=9&itype=11
More informationTHE ROLE OF PASSIVE SYSTEMS IN ENHANCING SAFETY AND PREVENTING ACCIDENTS IN ADVANCED REACTORS
THE ROLE OF PASSIVE SYSTEMS IN ENHANCING SAFETY AND PREVENTING ACCIDENTS IN ADVANCED REACTORS M. Aziz Nuclear and radiological regulatory authority Cairo, Egypt moustafaaaai@yahoo.com Abstract Most of
More informationFormat and Content of the Safety Analysis Report for Nuclear Power Plants - Core Set -
Format and Content of the Safety Analysis Report for Nuclear Power Plants - Core Set - 2013 Learning Objectives After going through this presentation the participants are expected to be familiar with:
More informationPROBABILISTIC SAFETY ANALYSIS IN SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ANALYSIS IN SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 1 GENERAL 3 2 PSA DURING THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NPP 3 2.1 Probabilistic design objectives 3 2.2 Design phase 4 2.3 Construction
More information1. General Data about the Barrow Site Brief Description of the Site Characteristics Use of PSA as part of the safety assessment 3
Contents Executive Summary 1. General Data about the Barrow Site 1 1.1 Brief Description of the Site Characteristics 1 1.2 Use of PSA as part of the safety assessment 3 2. Earthquakes 4 2.1 Design Basis
More informationSafety Aspects of SMRs: A PRA Perspective
Safety Aspects of SMRs: A PRA Perspective Mohammad Modarres Minta Martin Professor of Engineering Director, Reliability Engineering Program Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Maryland,
More informationNUCLEAR HEATING REACTOR AND ITS APPLICATION
NUCLEAR HEATING REACTOR AND ITS APPLICATION Zhang Yajun* and Zheng Wenxiang INET, Tsinghua University, Beijing China *yajun@dns.inet.tsinghua.edu.cn Abstract The development of nuclear heating reactor
More informationUNIT-5 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT. Joining of light nuclei Is not a chain reaction. Cannot be controlled
UNIT-5 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Introduction Nuclear Energy: Nuclear energy is the energy trapped inside each atom. Heavy atoms are unstable and undergo nuclear reactions. Nuclear reactions are of two types
More informationNSSS Design (Ex: PWR) Reactor Coolant System (RCS)
NSSS Design (Ex: PWR) Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Purpose: Remove energy from core Transport energy to S/G to convert to steam of desired pressure (and temperature if superheated) and moisture content
More informationLicensing of New Build Reactors in the UK Part 2
Licensing of New Build Reactors in the UK Part 2 Keith Ardron UK Licensing Manager, UK Imperial College Nuclear Thermalhydraulics Course: February 2014 Contents Role of Safety Authorities & Technical Support
More informationCompilation of recommendations and suggestions
Post- Fukushima accident Compilation of recommendations and suggestions Peer review of stress tests performed on European nuclear power plants 26/07/2012 Compilation of Recommendations and Suggestions
More informationSmall Modular Nuclear Reactor (SMR) Research and Development (R&D) and Deployment in China
Small Modular Nuclear Reactor (SMR) Research and Development (R&D) and Deployment in China Danrong Song, Biao Quan Nuclear Power Institute of China, Chengdu, China songdr@gmail.com Abstract Developing
More informationVVER-440/213 - The reactor core
VVER-440/213 - The reactor core The fuel of the reactor is uranium dioxide (UO2), which is compacted to cylindrical pellets of about 9 height and 7.6 mm diameter. In the centreline of the pellets there
More informationDesign Requirements Safety
Design Requirements Safety 22.39 Elements of Reactor Design, Operations, and Safety Fall 2005 George E. Apostolakis Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering 1
More informationReactor Technology: Materials, Fuel and Safety. Dr. Tony Williams
Reactor Technology: Materials, Fuel and Safety Dr. Tony Williams Course Structure Unit 1: Reactor materials Unit 2. Reactor types Unit 3: Health physics, Dosimetry Unit 4: Reactor safety Unit 5: Nuclear
More informationAccident Progression & Source Term Analysis
IAEA Training in Level 2 PSA MODULE 4: Accident Progression & Source Term Analysis Outline of Discussion Overview of severe accident progression and source term analysis Type of calculations typically
More informationOPG Proprietary Report
N/A R001 2 of 114 Table of Contents Page List of Tables and Figures... 5 Revision Summary... 6 Executive Summary... 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 9 1.1 Objectives... 10 1.2 Scope... 10 1.3 Organization of Summary...
More informationStress tests specifications Proposal by the WENRA Task Force 21 April 2011
Stress tests specifications Proposal by the WENRA Task Force 21 April 2011 Introduction Considering the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan, the Council of the European Union declared
More informationSMR/1848-T21b. Course on Natural Circulation Phenomena and Modelling in Water-Cooled Nuclear Reactors June 2007
SMR/1848-T21b Course on Natural Circulation Phenomena and Modelling in Water-Cooled Nuclear Reactors 25-29 June 2007 T21b - Selected Examples of Natural Circulation for Small Break LOCA and Som Severe
More informationDRAFT Regulatory Document RD 337 Design of New Nuclear Power Plants Issued for Internal Review and External Stakeholder Consultation October 2007
DRAFT Regulatory Document RD 337 Design of New Nuclear Power Plants Issued for Internal Review and External Stakeholder Consultation October 2007 Draft release date: 18/10/07 CNSC REGULATORY DOCUMENTS
More informationSupporting Deterministic T-H Analyses for Level 1 PSA
Supporting Deterministic T-H Analyses for Level 1 PSA ABSTRACT SLAVOMÍR BEBJAK VUJE, a.s. Okružná 5 918 64 Trnava, Slovakia slavomir.bebjak@vuje.sk TOMÁŠ KLIMENT VUJE, a.s. Okružná 5 918 64 Trnava, Slovakia
More informationNuScale Power Modular and Scalable Reactor. NuScale. Integral Pressurized Water Reactor. Light Water. Light Water.
NuScale Power Modular and Scalable Reactor Overview Full Name NuScale Power Modular and Scalable Reactor Acronym NuScale Reactor type Integral Pressurized Water Reactor Coolant Light Water Moderator Light
More informationIAEA Training in level 1 PSA and PSA applications. Other PSA s. Low power and shutdown PSA
IAEA Training in level 1 PSA and PSA applications Other PSA s Low power and shutdown PSA Content Why shutdown PSA? Definitions Plat damage states and Plant operational states Specific modelling tasks of
More informationMEETING THE OBJECTIVES OF THE VIENNA DECLARATION ON NUCLEAR SAFETY: LICENSING OF NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN PAKISTAN
MEETING THE OBJECTIVES OF THE VIENNA DECLARATION ON NUCLEAR SAFETY: LICENSING OF NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN PAKISTAN N.MUGHAL Email: nasir.mughal@pnra.org F.MANSOOR J.AKHTAR Abstract In the aftermath
More informationApproach to Practical Elimination in Finland
Approach to Practical Elimination in Finland M-L. Järvinen, N. Lahtinen and T. Routamo International Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety: Safety Demonstration of Advanced Water
More informationSafety Principles and Defence-in-Depth concept implemented in German Regulations
Safety Principles and Defence-in-Depth concept implemented in German Regulations Shanna Eismar, GRS 04 October 2016 IAEA Technical Meeting on Novel Design and Safety Principles of Nuclear Power Plants
More informationCore Management and Fuel Handling for Research Reactors
Core Management and Fuel Handling for Research Reactors A. M. Shokr Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation Safety International Atomic Energy Agency Outline Introduction Safety
More informationJournal of American Science 2014;10(2) Burn-up credit in criticality safety of PWR spent fuel.
Burn-up credit in criticality safety of PWR spent fuel Rowayda F. Mahmoud 1, Mohamed K.Shaat 2, M. E. Nagy 3, S. A. Agamy 3 and Adel A. Abdelrahman 1 1 Metallurgy Department, Nuclear Research Center, Atomic
More informationPost-Fukushima Assessment of the AP1000 Plant
ABSTRACT Post-Fukushima Assessment of the AP1000 Plant Ernesto Boronat de Ferrater Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC Padilla 17-3 Planta 28006, Madrid, Spain boronae@westinghouse.com Bryan N. Friedman,
More informationReactivity requirements can be broken down into several areas:
Reactivity Control (1) Reactivity Requirements Reactivity requirements can be broken down into several areas: (A) Sufficient initial reactivity should be installed to offset the depletion of U 235 and
More informationSevere Accident Progression Without Operator Action
DAA Technical Assessment Review of the Moderator Subcooling Requirements Model Severe Accident Progression Without Operator Action Facility: Darlington Classification: October 2015 Executive summary After
More informationTypes of Nuclear Reactors. Dr. GUVEN Professor of Aerospace Engineering Nuclear Science and Technology Engineer
Types of Nuclear Reactors Dr. GUVEN Professor of Aerospace Engineering Nuclear Science and Technology Engineer Types of Reactors (Fuel) As far as the type of fuels are concerned, three types of reactors
More informationApplication for Permission to Extend the Operating Period and Application for Approval of Construction Plans of Unit 3 at Mihama Nuclear Power Station
November 26, 2015 The Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc. Application for Permission to Extend the Operating Period and Application for Approval of Construction Plans of Unit 3 at Mihama Nuclear Power Station
More informationPressurized Water Reactors
Pressurized Water Reactors Illustrations and information from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/pressurize d_water_reactor The Ikata Nuclear Power Plant is located on Shikoku island at Ikata-cho. Heavy vs.
More informationANALYSIS OF AN EXTREME LOSS OF COOLANT IN THE IPR-R1 TRIGA REACTOR USING A RELAP5 MODEL
ANALYSIS OF AN EXTREME LOSS OF COOLANT IN THE IPR-R TRIGA REACTOR USING A RELAP MODEL P. A. L. Reis a, A. L. Costa a, C. Pereira a, M. A. F. Veloso a, H. V. Soares a, and A. Z. Mesquita b a Departamento
More information4.2 DEVELOPMENT OF FUEL TEST LOOP IN HANARO
4.2 DEVELOPMENT OF FUEL TEST LOOP IN HANARO Sungho Ahn a, Jongmin Lee a, Suki Park a, Daeyoung Chi a, Bongsik Sim a, Chungyoung Lee a, Youngki Kim a and Kyehong Lee b a Research Reactor Engineering Division,
More informationSAFETY GUIDES. Deterministic Safety Assessment РР - 5/2010 ÀÃÅÍÖÈß ÇÀ ßÄÐÅÍÎ ÐÅÃÓËÈÐÀÍÅ BULGARIAN NUCLEAR REGULATORY AGENCY
S ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Deterministic Safety Assessment РР - 5/2010 ÀÃÅÍÖÈß ÇÀ ßÄÐÅÍÎ ÐÅÃÓËÈÐÀÍÅ BULGARIAN NUCLEAR REGULATORY AGENCY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS...2 LEGAL
More informationCore Management and Fuel handling for Research Reactors
Core Management and Fuel handling for Research Reactors W. Kennedy, Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation Safety Yogyakarta, Indonesia 23/09/2013 Outline Introduction Safety
More informationSafety design approach for JSFR toward the realization of GEN-IV SFR
Safety design approach for JSFR toward the realization of GEN-IV SFR Advanced Fast Reactor Cycle System R&D Center Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) Shigenobu KUBO Contents 1. Introduction 2. Safety design
More informationRegulatory Actions and Follow up Measures against Fukushima Accident in Korea
Int Conference on Effective Nuclear Regulatory Systems, April 9, 2013, Canada Regulatory Actions and Follow up Measures against Fukushima Accident in Korea Seon Ho SONG* Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety
More informationEPR Safety in the post-fukushima context
EPR Safety in the post-fukushima context October 19 th 2011 Jürgen Wirkner, Peter Volkholz EPR safety approach An accident is a complex series of events: NEED THE MEANS TO REMAIN IN CONTROL OF THE SITUATION,
More informationMcGuire Nuclear Station UFSAR Chapter 15
McGuire Nuclear Station UFSAR Chapter 15 Table of Contents 15.0 Accident Analysis 15.0.1 References 15.1 Increase in Heat Removal by the Secondary System 15.1.1 Feedwater System Malfunctions that Result
More informationNUCLEAR PLANT WITH VK-300 BOILING WATER REACTORS FOR POWER AND DISTRICT HEATING GRIDS
7th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering Tokyo, Japan, April 19-23, 1999 ICONE-7335 NUCLEAR PLANT WITH VK-300 BOILING WATER REACTORS FOR POWER AND DISTRICT HEATING GRIDS Yu.N. Kuznetsov*, F.D.
More informationSevere accidents management in PWRs
Severe accidents management in PWRs J. Rajzrová, J.Jiřičková Abstract According to a new trend in safety upgrades in PWRs, the nuclear power plants have started to adopt strategs to mitigate events beyond
More informationSafety Classification of Structures, Systems and Components in Nuclear Power Plants
IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS DS367 Draft 6.1 Date: 20 November 2010 Formatted: Space Before: 0 pt, After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single Deleted: 5.10 Deleted: 1912 October Deleted: 18 for protecting people and the
More informationWestinghouse Small Modular Reactor Development Overview
Westinghouse Small Modular Reactor Development Overview Small Modular Reactor Development Team Westinghouse Electric Company Dr. Nick Shulyak Presentation to IAEA July 4, 2011 1 SMR Product Specifications
More informationChemical Engineering 693R
Chemical Engineering 693R Reactor Design and Analysis Lecture 11 Nuclear Safety Spiritual Thought 2 2 Kings 6:16 And he answered, Fear not: for they that be with us are more than they that be with them.
More informationJapanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response. April 15, 2011
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 15, 2011 Nuclear Energy in Japan 54 operating nuclear reactors (49 gigawatts) Two nuclear plants under construction Tokyo Electric Power Co. produces 27%
More informationSafety Classification of Mechanical Components for Fusion Application
Safety Classification of Mechanical Components for Fusion Application 13 rd International Symposium on Fusion Nuclear Technology 25-29 September 2017, Kyoto, Japan Oral Session 1-2: Nuclear System Design
More informationA detailed description of a naval reactor is classified for national security reasons; however, a general description can be provided.
Safety of U.S. Nuclear Powered Warships U.S. Nuclear Powered Warships (NPWs) have safely operated for more than 50 years without experiencing any reactor accident or any release of radioactivity that hurt
More informationFormat and Content of the Safety Analysis Report for Nuclear Power Plants - Application Set -
Format and Content of the Safety Analysis Report for Nuclear Power Plants - Application Set - 2013 Contents 1. Overview 2. Chapters and Content of a SAR Chapter 1 General Information Chapter 2, 3, 4, Chapter
More informationOPG Proprietary Report
N/A R001 2 of 121 Table of Contents Page List of Tables and Figures... 5 Revision Summary... 6 Executive Summary... 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 9 1.1 Objectives... 10 1.2 Scope... 10 1.3 Organization of Summary...
More informationApplication of Technologies in CANDU Reactors to Prevent/Mitigate the Consequences of a Severe Accidents
Application of Technologies in CANDU Reactors to Prevent/Mitigate the Consequences of a Severe Accidents Lovell Gilbert Section Manager/Technical Advisor, Reactor Safety Engineering Bruce Power IAEA International
More informationNew Safety Standards (SA) Outline (Draft) For Public Comment
Provisional Translation (Feb.7,2013 Rev.0) February 6, 2013 New Safety Standards (SA) Outline (Draft) For Public Comment 0 February 6, 2013 New Safety Standards (SA) Outline (Draft) Table of Contents Foreword
More information6-9. June 2017, Paks Gábor Volent director of safety and security. Severe accident management at Paks NPP
6-9. June 2017, Paks Gábor Volent director of safety and security Severe accident management at Paks NPP The MVM Paks Nuclear Power Plant the only nuclear power plant in Hungary belongs to the MVM Hungarian
More informationPROPOSAL OF A DRY STORAGE INSTALLATION IN ANGRA NPP FOR SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL
2009 International Nuclear Atlantic Conference - INAC 2009 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, September27 to October 2, 2009 ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE ENERGIA NUCLEAR - ABEN ISBN: 978-85-99141-03-8 PROPOSAL OF
More informationWestinghouse Small Modular Reactor. Passive Safety System Response to Postulated Events
Westinghouse Small Modular Reactor Passive Safety System Response to Postulated Events Matthew C. Smith Dr. Richard F. Wright Westinghouse Electric Company Westinghouse Electric Company 600 Cranberry Woods
More informationSafety enhancement of NPPs in China after Fukushima Accident
Safety enhancement of NPPs in China after Fukushima Accident CHAI Guohan 29 June 2015, Brussels National Nuclear Safety Administration, P. R. China Current Development of Nuclear Power Mid of year 2015
More information