GUIDANCE FOR DELINEATING INVASIVE AQUATIC PLANTS FOR MANAGMEMENT
|
|
- Virginia Freeman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GUIDANCE FOR DELINEATING INVASIVE AQUATIC PLANTS FOR MANAGMEMENT Objectives 1. Delineating and qualifying boundaries of invasive aquatic plants for management purposes. 2. Collect additional information on the geographic locations, size (boundaries), and relative abundance of invasive aquatic plants for management purposes. 3. Identify native aquatic plants and their locations in proximity to invasive aquatic plants to inform management decisions including buffering treated areas. Introduction Delineating vegetation is critical for natural resource planning, management and protection. A map provides a physical representation of where plants occur. By classifying vegetation, selected properties of the plants (e.g. species identity or relative abundance) can be used to describe and differentiate areas for management purposes. For example, the map can depict areas where invasive plants occur and distinguish areas with native plants. There are multiple needs for data on aquatic plant beds or stands. The MN DNR Invasive Species Program, lake groups and local units of government are interested in mapping stands of invasive and native aquatic plants for management activities (e.g. Eurasian watermilfoil, curly-leaf pondweed flowering rush or starry stonewort control as well as native plant protection), assisting in rapid response planning, evaluating and tracking populations over time. An aquatic plant surveyor must delineate invasive aquatic plants before management actions are undertaken. If a contractor or lake group completes a delineation, some effort by the DNR to verify the results is required. Generally, large beds or stands of invasive vegetation should be mapped as contiguous areas for management (polygons) and isolated plant occurrences mapped as points. Aquatic plant definitions and classifications Delineation: a specific type of survey recognized by the MN DNR that is used to identify areas of vegetation either targeted for control or identified for protection. Polygon: a shape, usually drawn with GIS or GPS, which describes the area of a plant stand or bed to be controlled or protected/buffered from management activities. Waypoint: a sample point or survey point taken with a GPS unit where plant observations are recorded. Stand or Bed: an area of vegetation that is identified based on distinctiveness and uniformity. It is mapped or delineated as a polygon based on the target species presence and abundance. Treatment: management activities used to control an invasive plant species generally through mechanical, chemical or biological means. Note MN DNR permits are required in most instances. 1 P age
2 Target Plant: the plant species (invasive or native) identified as the primary concern for the delineation (e.g. for control or protection purposes). Associated Plants: plants that are observed in a bed or stand but are not dominant. Both native and invasive plant species should be noted during the delineation as well as their respective relative rake fullness or visual abundance (see definition for Relative Rake Fullness or Visual Abundance below). Plant Abundance via. Rake Sampling: an abundance ranking (0-3) based on the number of plants or percent plant coverage observed at a sampling point (waypoint). For invasive plant delineations these rankings are used to determine potential management areas for control purposes. MN DNR Invasive Species Program uses a quantitative ranking of 0-3 based on rake coverage. (See Table 1 below for clarification). Table 1. Quantitative ranking (0-3) used to estimate plant abundance based on rake coverage and/or visual observation. A zero (0) ranking indicates no target plants were retrieved or observed in a sample. Stand Density: an overall abundance ranking for a target species within a larger plant stand or bed. Stand density can be used as an assessment tool by comparing stand densities over time or before and after management. Equipment A checklist of recommended field equipment is provided in Appendix. Data can be recorded on paper forms or electronically. If there are historic maps of target invasive plants or previously controlled areas, surveyors should review them and make copies on waterproof paper (e.g., Rite-in-the-rain ) to bring in the field or input them into their GPS devices. 2 P age
3 If mapping with a hand-held or boat-mounted GPS unit (e.g. Garmin Map 76 or GPS Map 78), surveyors must collect a series of waypoints, boat tracks and notes to identify the plant species associated with each delineated plant bed or stand. Post-processing of data generally occurs with a desktop computer using a GIS mapping program such as ArcMap or Google Earth to create delineated polygons (i.e. treatment polygons, or native species beds or stands) from the boat tracks and waypoint observations. Processed data should be submitted to the DNR including GIS files and associated invasive/native plant data (as a tabular electronic spreadsheet) so that a map can be recreated if needed. Delineation timing and purpose A field delineation is simply the process of mapping the extent (edges) of invasive and native aquatic plant stands or beds. Surveys are best done under low to moderate wind conditions (< 20 km/h or 12 mi/h). Surveyors should time pre-treatment delineations when the target aquatic plant is actively growing and observable. The distribution and abundance of plants can change dramatically throughout the growing season and from year to year. For this reason, delineations are generally performed during the season in which management has been planned for the target plant. To schedule early season delineations (typically applies to curly-leaf pondweed), communication with lake residents/users can be helpful as they may have knowledge of when plants are present. To evaluate effectiveness of management efforts, a follow-up delineation can be performed after treatment or the subsequent year depending on the management strategy. Lastly, additional surveys, such as point-intercept surveys, may be appropriate to identify changes in a plant community over time and at a lakewide scale. The objective of a point-intercept survey is distinct from a delineation and these surveys are not ideal to identify areas for invasive plant control (i.e. delineate polygons). Conducting the delineation Delineation of a target plant occurs through field observations generally made via three methods. These methods are often combined during a delineation and include: visual observations, SONAR (fishfinder) observations, and thrown or spun rake observations. The ability to visually identify the boundaries of submersed plant stands varies with water clarity, depth, wind, plant height and plant cover. If water clarity is limited, a surveyor must use a sampling rake or other below-water sampling device to identify plants. A metal rake head attached to a rope can be thrown and dragged along the lake bottom, or a rake head attached to a long pole pushed to the lake bottom and spun (rotated). The surveyor then records each plant species collected on the rake and quantifies rake fullness to characterize relative plant abundance. SONAR can assist in below water plant observations but must be verified by a sampling rake. Delineation field process 3 P age
4 1. Pre-survey: gather previous year s delineation or polygons and upload this information on the GPS unit for reference. If helpful, review bathymetric maps (lake contours) to get an idea where submersed invasive plants may grow. 2. Record the track of the boat with the GPS receiver. 3. Beginning at one end of the first area to delineate, run transects (paths) perpendicular from shore lakeward, using a zig-zag pattern for narrow littoral zones (See Figure 2 below). Figure 1. Example of delineation process. Polygon indicates an invasive plant treatment area, solid black line indicates boat track, and waypoints indicate plant abundance observations. 4. Along the transect, take waypoints at regular intervals noting target and associated plant observations (see below Sampling Waypoints for more information). If the target area is narrow, make the intervals short and vice versa. NOTE: A general rule could be applied which allows for points to be spaced meters apart on small lakes ( acres), 35m on medium lakes ( acres) and 50m on large lakes (1000+ acres). Additionally, one hundred (100) waypoints is a general minimum number of survey points to be taken on a small waterbody. However, number of survey points will vary depending on the size of survey area, extent of infestation, and whether the stands are monocultures or are composed of a diverse mix of plant species. 4 P age
5 5. As sampling progresses to deeper depths, stop when the target plant is no longer observed. 6. Repeat this process until the entire littoral zone or targeted area has been surveyed. Postprocessing of collected data is then completed using GIS software to edit polygons and create a map. 7. As an option, surveyors can assign a qualitative stand density rating for each delineated plant stand based on the target plants (see Figure 6). Surveyors can sample random points within the stand by rake toss and use the average rake-collected relative abundance of the target plant (on a scale of 1-3) to characterize stand density. Sampling Waypoints: (At each sample point) 1. If visibility is adequate, record visual plant observations or use a sampling rake if inadequate or to verify plant species present. Use SONAR to assist in detecting plant presence, especially at deeper depths. Record and estimate the range in depths where target invasive plant occurs. 2. Record water depth at all sample points (if available). 3. Record an estimate of relative abundance of the target plant at each sample waypoint (use the abundance scale of 0-3 and see Table 1 for rake abundance clarification). 4. Record observations of native plants when present and their relative abundance (i.e. rake fullness). Early season native plants may be sparse, small and more difficult to detect. Note the presence and location of stands of floating leaf and emergent vegetation. 5. Other parameters or observations to consider: Water temperature: Record 1-3 observations of water temperature below surface at dispersed locations around the lake including GPS location and depth of temperature reading. Some observers record temperatures from different depths: surface, mid depth, and near lake bottom. Water clarity: record at least one observation and GPS location of Secchi disk transparency during survey at a lake depth that exceeds the Secchi observation. Other observations: it may be helpful to include the weather and conditions of your survey day. Additionally, any other notes that may be helpful to your delineation assessment. 5 P age
6 Figure 2. Example field data recording sheet for delineation surveys. 6 P age
7 Figure 3. Example field data recording sheet for delineation survey on Middle Cormorant Lake. Abundance ranking represented as 1-3, zeros (0) not listed. 7 P age
8 Figure 4. Example delineation map with proposed treatment polygons for Eurasian watermilfoil. Points courtesy of Anoka Conservation District. 8 P age
9 Figure 5. Example delineation map of Eurasian watermilfoil. Lake Josephine, Ramsey County, MN. 9 Page
10 Figure 6. Example map inset of delineated polygons of Eurasian watermilfoil with qualitative density ranking. 10 P age
11 APPENDIX Example Field Delineation Equipment List Clipboard Lake Access point / Map Data sheets on waterproof paper (Rite-in-the-rain ) or electronic data collection device Bathymetric map of lake Pencils Double sided rake on rope or metal garden rake with handle Plant ID books/ AIS identification sheets Polarized sunglasses Plastic bags/collection containers Sharpie marker Sorting trays for plants and invertebrates (white or light color) Hand lens Digital camera Depth Pole or SONAR fishfinder Boat / Canoe Life Jackets [1 each wearable (USCG Type 1, 2, 3, or 5) and 1 throwable (USCG Type IV)] GPS Unit with historical data/polygons uploaded Secchi disk 11 P age
Aquatic Plant Treatment Evaluation
Aquatic Plant Treatment Evaluation Purpose and Applicability This protocol is used to evaluate the results of herbicide application or any other manipulation (but from here on called a chemical application
More informationBIG CARNELIAN LAKE, WASHINGTON COUNTY: 2017 AQUATIC VEGETATION REPORT
BIG CARNELIAN LAKE, WASHINGTON COUNTY: 2017 AQUATIC VEGETATION REPORT Report by the Invasive Species Program Division of Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Lake: Big
More informationLAKE JOSEPHINE, RAMSEY COUNTY: 2017 AQUATIC VEGETATION REPORT
LAKE JOSEPHINE, RAMSEY COUNTY: 2017 AQUATIC VEGETATION REPORT Report by the Invasive Species Program Division of Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Lake: Josephine
More informationWilkinson Lake. Macrophyte and Biovolume Survey 8/11/17
Wilkinson Lake 8/11/17 This document contains two types of vegetation data collected on Wilkinson Lake. The first section details the methods and findings of a point intercept survey of macrophyte vegetation.
More informationLong Lake ( ) Aquatic Vegetation Survey
Long Lake (15-0057-00) Aquatic Vegetation Survey 22796 County Highway 6 Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 (218) 846-1465 www.rmbel.info Lake: Long Lake DOW Number: 15-0057-00 Date of inspection: 7/14/ 2015 County:
More informationMcMAHON LAKE, SCOTT COUNTY: 2017 AQUATIC VEGETATION REPORT
McMAHON LAKE, SCOTT COUNTY: 2017 AQUATIC VEGETATION REPORT Report by the Invasive Species Program Division of Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Lake: McMahon (DOW#
More informationAQUATIC VEGETATION SURVEY REPORT Year Two of Myriophyllum spicatum Management LAKE FAIRLEE Fairlee, West Fairlee & Thetford Vermont 2011
AQUATIC VEGETATION SURVEY REPORT Year Two of Myriophyllum spicatum Management LAKE FAIRLEE Fairlee, West Fairlee & Thetford Vermont 2011 SUBMITTED: NOVEMBER 3, 2011 BY: William E. Stevenson, President
More informationCharley Lake. Macrophyte and Biovolume Survey 8/04/17
Charley Lake 8/04/17 This document contains two types of vegetation data collected on Charley Lake. The first section details the methods and findings of a point intercept survey of macrophyte vegetation.
More informationHAM LAKE, ANOKA COUNTY: 2017 AQUATIC VEGETATION REPORT
HAM LAKE, ANOKA COUNTY: 2017 AQUATIC VEGETATION REPORT Report by the Invasive Species Program Division of Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Lake: Ham (DOW# 02005300)
More informationDNR Lake Vegetation Management Plan
DNR Lake Vegetation Management Plan Lake Sarah, Hennepin County (DOW# 27019100) Final LVMP with Signatures Date Signed: 3/27/2018 Expiration Date: 3/27/2023 Management Targets(s): Curly-leaf pondweed (CLP)
More informationLomond Lake ( ) Aquatic Vegetation Survey
Lomond Lake (15-0081-00) Aquatic Vegetation Survey 22796 County Highway 6 Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 (218) 846-1465 www.rmbel.info Lake: Lomond Lake DOW Number: 15-0081-00 Date of inspection: 7/13/ 2015 County:
More informationPine Lake ( ) Aquatic Vegetation Survey
Pine Lake (15-0149-00) Aquatic Vegetation Survey 22796 County Highway 6 Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 (218) 846-1465 www.rmbel.info Lake: Pine Lake DOW Number: 15-0149-00 Date of inspection: 6/30, 7/2/ 2015
More information2014 AQUATIC VEGETATION SURVEY
Cedar Lake, Scott County: 2014 AQUATIC VEGETATION SURVEY Report by the Invasive Species Program Division of Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Lake: Cedar Lake (DOW#70009100)
More information2015 Big Lake Aquatic Weed Control Program
2015 Big Lake Aquatic Weed Control Program Prepared for Big Lake LMD #1 Skagit County Public Works Mount Vernon, Washington Prepared by Northwest Aquatic Eco-Systems, Inc. 855 Trosper Road SW #108-313
More informationLake Campbell and Lake Erie 2015 Aquatic Plant Control Program
Lake Campbell and Lake Erie 2015 Aquatic Plant Control Program Prepared for: Lake Erie & Campbell LMD #3 Skagit County Public Works Mount Vernon, Washington Prepared by: Northwest Aquatic Eco-Systems 855
More information2016 Clear Lake Aquatic Weed Control Program
2016 Clear Lake Aquatic Weed Control Program Prepared for Clear Lake LMD #4 Skagit County Public Works Mount Vernon, Washington Prepared by Northwest Aquatic Eco-Systems, Inc. 855 Trosper Road SW #108-313
More informationBeaver Lake 2012 Aquatic Plant Control Program
Beaver Lake 2012 Aquatic Plant Control Program Prepared By Northwest Aquatic Eco-Systems 855 Trosper Road SW #108-313 Tumwater, WA 98512 360-357-3285 Pondweeds@comcast.net www.nwaquaticecosystems.com Project
More informationEurasian Watermilfoil in the Briggs Lake Chain: 2016
www. Osseo, M 55369i james@freshwatersci.com Eurasian Watermilfoil in the Briggs Lake Chain: 2016 Briggs Lake (#71-0146) Julia Lake (#71-0145) Rush Lake (#71-0147) Big Elk Lake (#71-0141) Summer Delineation
More informationPilot projects to control curly-leaf pondweed or Eurasian watermilfoil on a lake-wide or bay-wide basis for ecological benefits
Pilot projects to control curly-leaf pondweed or Eurasian watermilfoil on a lake-wide or bay-wide basis for ecological benefits Funds available from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Grant
More informationWebster Lake Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan Review & Update
Webster Lake Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan Review & Update Nathan W. Long VP Lake Management Services September 8, 2016 LARE Review State funds received from fee on boat registration Administered
More informationNew York State Federation of Lake Associations. New York Citizens Statewide Lake Assessment Program
New York State Federation of Lake Associations New York Citizens Statewide Lake Assessment Program AQUATIC VEGETATION SAMPLING 1. BACKGROUND Aquatic vegetation plays a critical role in lake ecosystems.
More informationWorking with partners to manage Invasive Aquatic Plants
Working with partners to manage Invasive Aquatic Plants By: Chip Welling Coordinator, Management of Invasive Aquatic Species MnDNR To: State of Water conference Alexandria Date: 2016 April 15 S-o-W_2016_Apr_15-CW.ppt
More informationPoint-Intercept Aquatic Plant Surveys for Bone Lake, Washington County, Minnesota
Bone Lake, Washington County, Minnesota, May 28, 2013 Point-Intercept Aquatic Plant Surveys for Bone Lake, Washington County, Minnesota Early Season Survey: May 28, 2013 Late Season Survey: September 13,
More information8 LITTLE CROSBY LAKE RESULTS
8 LITTLE CROSBY LAKE RESULTS 8.1 LITTLE CROSBY LAKE BACKGROUND Figure 8-1: View of the south shoreline of. is 8 acres with an average depth of 7 ft and a maximum depth of 34 ft. Little Crosby Lake is a
More informationWest Battle Lake Aquatic Vegetation, Point-Intercept Survey
West Battle Lake Aquatic Vegetation, Point-Intercept Survey A PROPOSAL TO: West Battle Lake Association October 7, 2016 22796 County Highway 6 Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 (218) 846-1465 www.rmbel.info Table
More informationCocolalla Lake Bathymetry Information and Proposal
April 17, 2014 Fred Vincent President Cocolalla Lake Association PO Box 133 Cocolalla, ID 83813 Subject: Cocolalla Lake Bathymetry Information and Proposal With respect to our recent communication regarding
More information2013 Milfoil Weevil Stocking and Survey at Dewart Lake, Kosciusko County, Indiana. The Dewart Lake Protective Association
2013 Milfoil Weevil Stocking and Survey at Dewart Lake, Kosciusko County, Indiana The Dewart Lake Protective Association Project No. 1639-3921 Date: November 8, 2013 1.0 Introduction Eurasian watermilfoil
More informationAquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Haas Lake, Scott County, Minnesota
Haas Lake, Scott County, Minnesota, 2017 Aquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Haas Lake, Scott County, Minnesota [Plant Survey Conducted August 29, 2017] Prepared for: Prior Lake-Spring Lake Watershed
More informationFish Trap Lake MORRISON COUNTY
Fish Trap Lake 49-0137-00 MORRISON COUNTY Aquatic Vegetation Point-intercept Survey Survey Date 5 17 18 Observers Emelia Hauck, Garrett Brossart Date of Report 6 27 18 Report Author Kaira Kamke, Moriya
More informationSustainable Lake Management Plan. Black Lake, Ramsey County, MN
Sustainable Lake Management Plan Black Lake, Ramsey County, MN Prepared by Kristine Jenson, Program Manager 2015 This page was left blank intentionally. BLACK LAKE SUSTAINABLE LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN - 2015
More information2016 Big Lake Aquatic Weed Control Program
2016 Big Lake Aquatic Weed Control Program Prepared for Big Lake LMD #1 Skagit County Public Works Mount Vernon, Washington Prepared by Northwest Aquatic Eco-Systems, Inc. 855 Trosper Road SW #108-313
More informationFish Lake; Echo Bay ( ) Aquatic Vegetation Survey
Fish Lake; Echo Bay (56-0768-00) Aquatic Vegetation Survey 22796 County Highway 6 Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 (218) 846-1465 www.rmbel.info Lake: Fish Lake; Echo Bay DOW Number: 56-0768-00 Date of inspection:
More informationShipshewana Lake Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan Lagrange County, Indiana
Shipshewana Lake Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan Lagrange County, Indiana 2006-2010 http://129.79.145.7/arcims/statewide%5fmxd/viewer.htm Prepared for: The Shipshewana Community Lake Improvement Association
More information2017 Aquatic Plant Survey: Duck Lake (WBIC# )
577 Creekside Lane Osseo, MN 5569 james@freshwatersci.com (65) 6-8696 07 Aquatic Plant Survey: Duck Lake (WBIC# 7-0069-00) Surveyed August, 07 Surveying, Analysis, and Reporting by: James A. Johnson Freshwater
More informationWest Battle Lake. Aquatic Vegetation Survey County Highway 6 Detroit Lakes, MN (218)
West Battle Lake Aquatic Vegetation Survey 2017 22796 County Highway 6 Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 (218) 846-1465 www.rmbel.info Lake: West Battle DOW Number: 56-0239-00 Date of inspection: June 26-29, 2017
More information2012 Lake Vegetation Summary Lake Sarah (Hennepin County)
2012 Lake Vegetation Summary Lake Sarah (Hennepin County) Introduction Lake Sarah is a 561 acre lake located near the town of Rockford in Hennepin County. It has a littoral area of 373 acres, and is dominated
More informationUse of automated technologies for the mapping and monitoring of ponds and lakes. Ray Valley Contour Innovations LLC
Use of automated technologies for the mapping and monitoring of ponds and lakes Ray Valley Contour Innovations LLC Mapping does not require an advanced degree anymore A 30-step process has been brought
More informationEcological Study to Measure the Effectiveness of Soft Sediment Dredging to Eradicate Invasive and Nuisance Species
Ecological Study to Measure the Effectiveness of Soft Sediment Dredging to Eradicate Invasive and Nuisance Species Upper Lake Yaphank, New York June 2015 Prepared for: Town of Brookhaven One Independence
More informationMonitoring and response following the discovery of starry stonewort (Nitellopsis obtusa) in Wisconsin
Monitoring and response following the discovery of starry stonewort (Nitellopsis obtusa) in Wisconsin Illinois Lake Management Association Conference March 22-24, 2018 Bloomington, IL Michelle Nault AIS
More informationEffectiveness of Temporary Carp Barriers for Promoting Wild Rice Growth in a Southern Bay of Upper Clam Lake
www.fixmylake.com 18029 83 rd Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55311 mail@freshwatersci.com (651) 336-8696 Effectiveness of Temporary Carp Barriers for Promoting Wild Rice Growth in a Southern Bay of Upper
More informationClear Lake and Apsey Lake
2013 Report of the Milfoil Solution Post Program Survey in Clear Lake and Apsey Lake Prepared for: The Town of Espanola, ON Prepared by: EnviroScience, Inc., 5070 Stow Road, Stow, Ohio 44224 (800) 940-4025
More informationShoreland Rules Revision Project Using GIS in North-Central Minnesota
Shoreland Rules Revision Project Using GIS in North-Central Minnesota Andrew J. Williquett Department of Resource Analysis, Saint Mary s University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55404 Keywords: GIS, docks,
More informationChristmas Lake Milfoil Weevil Stocking Program: Aquatic Plant Evaluation for 2012
Eurasian Watermilfoil in an Area Stocked with Weevils in Christmas Lake, 2012 Christmas Lake Milfoil Weevil Stocking Program: Aquatic Plant Evaluation for 2012 Survey Dates: Pre-Weevil Survey: May 23,
More informationLake Campbell and Lake Erie 2012 Aquatic Plant Control Program
Lake Campbell and Lake Erie 2012 Aquatic Plant Control Program Prepared By Northwest Aquatic Eco-Systems 855 Trosper Road SW #108-313 Tumwater, WA 98512 360-357-3285 Pondweeds@comcast.net www.nwaquaticecosystems.com
More informationPretty Lake Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan 2014 Update LaGrange County, Indiana
Pretty Lake Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan 2014 Update LaGrange County, Indiana Prepared for: The Pretty Lake Conservation Club C/O Mr. Rod Bergstedt 4545 S 890 E Wolcottville, IN 46795 March 1, 2015
More informationConsiderations for the Development of Aquatic Plant Survey Methods for Alaska
15 th Annual Invasive Species Workshop Considerations for the Development of Aquatic Plant Survey Methods for Alaska Cecil F. Rich and Suresh A. Sethi, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 E. Tudor Rd.,
More informationCLMP+ Report on Grass Lake (Anoka County) Lake ID# CLMP+ Data Summary
CLMP+ Report on Grass Lake (Anoka County) Lake ID# 02-0113-00 2012-2013 CLMP+ Data Summary October 2014 Authors Shannon Martin, MPCA Editing and graphic design Public Information Office Staff The (MPCA)
More informationFlowering Rush Delineation, Control, and Assessment for Forest Lake, Washington County, Minnesota, 2016
in Forest Lake, July, 2016, Control, and Assessment for Forest Lake, Washington County, Minnesota, 2016 : July 14 and 15, 2016 Herbicide Treatments on 36 acres: August 3 and 31, 2016 Assessment: September
More informationVegetation survey of South Lindstrom Lake ( ), Chisago County, Minnesota. Summer 2010
Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries Vegetation survey of South Lindstrom Lake (13-0028), Chisago County, Minnesota Summer 2010 Area Fisheries Supervisor
More informationSpokane River Project Aquatic Weed Management Program
Spokane River Project Aquatic Weed Management Program David Armes Terrestrial Resource Specialist (509) 495-2796 david.armes@avistacorp.com Aquatic Weeds, Why Should You Care? Invasive aquatic weeds degrade
More informationAquatic Plant Point-Intercept Surveys for Sea Lake, Scandia, Minnesota, 2016
Sea Lake, Scandia, Minnesota, June 20, 2015 Aquatic Plant Point-Intercept Surveys for Sea Lake, Scandia, Minnesota, 2016 [Plant Surveys Conducted: June 2 and August 23, 2016] Prepared for: Comfort Lake
More informationAquatic Vegetation of Green Lake Isanti County, Minnesota (DOW ) June 14-15, 2005
Aquatic Vegetation of Green Lake Isanti County, Minnesota (DOW 30-0136-00) June 14-15, 2005 Green Lake (DOW 30-0136-00) Isanti Co. June 15, 2005 Report by: Donna Perleberg Minnesota Department of Natural
More informationTreatment Report. Professional Lake Management (PLM) was awarded a contract to manage Flowering Rush within the Pelican River Watershed District.
Patrick Selter V.P. PLM Lake and Land Management 9/8/2008 Treatment Report Background Professional Lake Management (PLM) was awarded a contract to manage Flowering Rush within the Pelican River Watershed
More informationSuccessful Operational Use of Renovate OTF for Selective Control of Myriophyllum hll spicatum (Eurasian watermilfoil) in Three New York Lakes:
Successful Operational Use of Renovate OTF for Selective Control of Myriophyllum hll spicatum (Eurasian watermilfoil) in Three New York Lakes: Saratoga, Lamoka, Waneta Authors: Mark Heilman, Ph.D., SePRO
More informationONEIDA COUNTY LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT. Alva Lake. AIS Monitoring and Water Clarity Report of September 9, 2015
ONEIDA COUNTY LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT Alva Lake Page 1: AIS Monitoring and Water Clarity Report of September 9, 2015 Jean Hansen, County Conservationist Michele Sadauskas, AIS Coordinator
More informationLake Vegetation Management Plan
Variance Requested by Cooperator Variance Approved (see Section VI) Section I: Lake Information Name: Owasso DOW Number: 62005600 County: Ramsey Fisheries Area: East Metro Surface Acres: 393, MN DNR Littoral
More informationAquatic vegetation point intercept survey of Green Lake ( ), Isanti County, Minnesota. June 15, 2012
Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries Aquatic vegetation point intercept survey of Green Lake (30-0136), Isanti County, Minnesota June 15, 2012 Report
More informationONEIDA COUNTY LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT. Lake George. AIS Monitoring and Water Clarity Report of June 29, 2016
ONEIDA COUNTY LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT Lake George Page 1: AIS Monitoring and Water Clarity Report of June 29, 2016 Michele Sadauskas, County Conservationist Stephanie Boismenue, AIS Coordinator
More informationRelicensing Study 3.5.1
Relicensing Study 3.5.1 BASELINE INVENTORY OF WETLAND, RIPARIAN AND LITTORAL HABITAT IN THE TURNERS FALLS IMPOUNDMENT, AND ASSESSMENT OF OPERATIONAL IMPACTS ON SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES Initial Study Report
More information2014 Lamoka and Waneta Lakes Plant Community Response to the 2008 through 2014 Triclopyr Applications to Control Eurasian watermilfoil
2014 Lamoka and Waneta Lakes Plant Community Response to the 2008 through 2014 Triclopyr Applications to Control Eurasian watermilfoil Wolffia columbiana 0.6% Nymphaea odorata 3.1% 2.3% Potamogeton praelongus
More informationAquatic invasive species in inland lakes: Distribution, abundance, impact
Aquatic invasive species in inland lakes: Distribution, abundance, impact Jake Vander Zanden Gretchen Hansen Alex Latzka Center for Limnology University of Wisconsin Madison http://limnology.wisc.edu/personnel/jakevz/
More informationAmnicon & Dowling Lakes Aquatic Plant Management Planning Project
Amnicon & Dowling Lakes Aquatic Plant Management Planning Project Project Background Aquatic Invasive Species Education, Prevention and Planning Grant Application Submitted to WDNR in August 2011 Awarded
More informationLake Shirley 2013 Aquatic Vegetation Survey
Lake Shirley 2013 Project Report October 18, 2013 Prepared For: Lake Shirley Improvement Corporation SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION Geosyntec Consultants (Geosyntec) was contracted by the Lake Shirley Improvement
More informationVolunteers Keeping A Watchful Eye on the Health of Maine Lakes and Ponds for 39 Years!
Volunteers Keeping A Watchful Eye on the Health of Maine Lakes and Ponds for 39 Years! VLMP is the Largest Collector and Provider of Lake Data in the State of Maine 2009 608 volunteers collected water
More informationEvaluation of aquatic plant control via automated mechanical roller system
Evaluation of aquatic plant control via automated mechanical roller system T.L. Brandt 1 INTRODUCTION Canadarago Lake (N42 o 48.9, W75 o.4 ), 39 m (128ft) above sea level, is located in the towns of Exeter,
More informationAQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES PREVENTION
AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES PREVENTION 2016 Annual Report Chisago and Northern Washington Counties January 12, 2017 2016 Aquatic Invasive Species Prevention Chisago and Northern Washington County Contents
More informationFriends of Bolton Lakes 2016 Aquatic Plant Surveys
Friends of Bolton Lakes 2016 Aquatic Plant Surveys The Friends of Bolton Lakes conducted their annual aquatic plant surveys of Lower and Middle Bolton Lakes on July 20 and 21. The surveys were performed
More informationLAKE 11/1/2010. Clear
CLEAR LAKE SKAGIT COUNTY, 20100 11/1/2010 Clear Lake 2010 Aquatic Plant Management Report Clear Lake Skagit County, 2010 Clear Lake Skagit County, 2010 CLEAR LAKE 2010 AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT REPORT Introduction
More informationPortage Lake Hubbard County
Prepared in cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Lake ID: 9- Area: acres Watershed Area: 6,7 acres Ecoregion: Northern Lakes and Forests (NLF) Portage Lake Hubbard County
More informationGetting a handle on hybrids: assessing the distribution of hybrid watermilfoil
Getting a handle on hybrids: assessing the distribution of hybrid watermilfoil Raymond M. Newman Jasmine A. Eltawely Fisheries, Wildlife & Conservation Biology University of Minnesota Ryan A. Thum Plant
More informationClam Lakes (Lower & Upper), Burnett County Four-Phased Lake Management Planning Project Description
1 Clam Lakes (Lower & Upper), Burnett County Four-Phased Lake Management Planning Project Description Lake and Watershed Characteristics The Clam Lakes are a combined 1544 acres with Upper Clam Lake essentially
More informationUniversity of Rhode Island Cooperative Extension's Watershed Watch Aquatic Plant Survey Manual
University of Rhode Island Cooperative Extension's Watershed Watch Aquatic Plant Survey Manual I. Introduction Macrophytes: larger rooted aquatic plants. littoral zone: shallow areas where sufficient light
More informationMinnesota Department of Natural Resources. Aquatic Plant Management Program
Minnesota epartment of Natural Resources Aquatic Plant Management Program The Goal of the MN NR s Aquatic Plant Management Program-APM Protect & enhance Minnesota s aquatic resources, while allowing lakeshore
More informationTown of Barnstable Hydrilla Control Program: Long Pond, Mystic Lake & Middle Pond
Town of Barnstable 2014 Hydrilla Control Program: Long Pond, Mystic Lake & Middle Pond Hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) Management Program Activities Project Completion Report for 2014 Hydrilla Management
More informationKerr Lake Vegetation Survey. October November Report submitted by NC State University. Background
Kerr Lake Vegetation Survey October November 2011 Report submitted by NC State University Background Hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) is a non-native invasive submersed aquatic plant. This plant was first
More information* Horseshoe Lake. Fall 2017 Hybrid Water-milfoil High Density Area
Hybrid Eurasian X Northern water-milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum X Myriophyllum sibiricum) Fall Bed Mapping Survey Horseshoe Lake - WBIC: 2630100 Polk/Barron Counties, Wisconsin Hybrid Water-milfoil (C.
More informationUSING AQUATIC PLANT SURVEYS TO EVALUTE LAKE QUALITY
USING AQUATIC PLANT SURVEYS TO EVALUTE LAKE QUALITY Reesa Evans, Lake Specialist Certified Lake Manager Adams County Land & Water Conservation Department P.O. Box 287 Friendship, WI 53934 Water is an important
More informationJanuary 30, Ms. Joanna Bilotta, President Lake Shirley Improvement Corporation (LSIC) PO Box 567 Shirley, MA 01464
January 30, 2014 Ms. Joanna Bilotta, President Lake Shirley Improvement Corporation (LSIC) PO Box 567 Shirley, MA 01464 Re: 2013 Year End Report for the Aquatic Management Program at Lake Shirley Dear
More informationHadlock Pond, Washington Co., Lake Hadlock Association, Inc.
Hadlock Pond, Washington Co., Lake Hadlock Association, Inc. Lake Characteristics Watershed Characteristics Surface Area (ac/ha) Max Depth (ft/m) Mean Depth (ft/m) Retention Time (years) Water Class Dam
More informationAquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Forest Lake, Washington County, 2013
Example of Aquatic Plants sampled in July 2013 on Forest Lake Aquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Forest Lake, Washington County, 2013 Point-Intercept Aquatic Plant Survey: July 11 and 12, 2013 Prepared
More informationPosition Statement Lake Minnetonka Milfoil Control
Eurasian watermilfoil has been in Lake Minnetonka since 1987. In 1989, the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) initiated a harvesting program to cut and remove milfoil from critical areas of the
More informationSilver Lake Waushara County, Wisconsin 2016 AIS Aquatic Pesticide Application Report
Silver Lake Waushara County, Wisconsin 2016 AIS Aquatic Pesticide Application Report Initial Treatment Tracks 5/26/2016 Second Treatment Tracks 7/21/2016 Third Treatment Tracks 9/1/2016 Prepared By: www.cleanlakesmidwest.com
More informationAQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SAVANNAH DISTRICT WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS SOUTH CAROLINA AND GEORGIA
AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SAVANNAH DISTRICT WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS SOUTH CAROLINA AND GEORGIA Appendix A CY 2014 Update Annual Aquatic Plant Treatment Plan and Summary
More informationAquatic Plant Control
Thompson Lake 2015 Annual Nuisance Aquatic Plant Control Report Prepared for: Thompson Lake Improvement Board c/o Livingston County Drain Commissioner's Office 2300 E Grand River Ave. Suite 105 Howell,
More informationAquatic Plants in Lake Simcoe
Aquatic Plants in Lake Simcoe LSRCA Board of Directors October 28, 2016 Brian Ginn Limnologist, Certified Lake Manager Member of Conservation Ontario Aquatic Plants - Plants growing above / below / floating
More informationEast Okoboji Lake Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan. Curlyleaf Pondweed Control
East Okoboji Lake Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan Curlyleaf Pondweed Control What is Curlyleaf Pondweed? Non-native submersed, rooted aquatic plant Introduced in the mid 1800 s First found in Iowa
More informationRed Rock Lake: A Path Forward
University of Minnesota Morris Digital Well University of Minnesota Morris Digital Well Center for Small Towns 6-2016 Red Rock Lake: A Path Forward Colette Millard Student - University of Minnesota, Morris
More informationTruckee River Aquatic Invasive Plant Survey Results
Truckee River Aquatic Invasive Plant Survey Results Submitted by U.C. Davis, Tahoe Environmental Research Center Prepared by Katie Senft and Brant Allen Submitted August 1, 2016 Contact for questions and
More informationControl of Eurasian Water Milfoil & Large-scale Aquatic Herbicide Use Updated July 2006 Prepared by WDNR Lakes and Aquatic Plant Management Staff
Control of Eurasian Water Milfoil & Large-scale Aquatic Herbicide Use Updated July 2006 Prepared by WDNR Lakes and Aquatic Plant Management Staff Introduction The spread of aquatic invasive plants is a
More informationSURFACE WATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES
SURFACE WATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES Section 5 September 20, 2017 Status & Trend Networks Sampling Manual Carolyn Voyles WMS Project Manager Major Topics Determination of When / When Not to Collect Samples
More information2016 Data Report for Bruin Lake, Washtenaw County
Michigan Lakes Ours to Protect 1 Data Report for Bruin Lake, Washtenaw County Site ID: 8575.189788 N, 8.39387 W The CLMP is brought to you by: 1 About this report: This report is a summary of the data
More informationMayflower Lake Management Planning Committee UWSP Center for Watershed Science and Education Marathon County Wisconsin Department of Natural
Mayflower Lake Management Planning Committee UWSP Center for Watershed Science and Education Marathon County Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Reduces conflicts Addresses problems Allows for proactive
More information2018 Data Report for. Lotus Lake, Oakland County
Michigan Lakes Ours to Protect 218 Data Report for Lotus Lake, Oakland County 42.6941 N, 83.4244 W The CLMP is brought to you by: 1 About this report: This report is a summary of the data that have been
More information2017 Data Report for Perch Lake, Iron County
Michigan Lakes Ours to Protect 217 Data Report for Perch Lake, Iron County Site ID: 3646 46.361392 N, 88.658338 W The CLMP is brought to you by: 1 About this report: This report is a summary of the data
More informationPortage Lake CASS COUNTY
Portage Lake 11-0204-00 CASS COUNTY Summary Portage Lake is located near Bena, MN in Cass County. It covers 1,539 acres, which places it in the upper 10% of lakes in Minnesota in terms of size. Portage
More informationSURFACE WATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES
SURFACE WATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES Section 5 February 2017 Status & Trend Networks Sampling Manual Carolyn Voyles WMS Project Manager Major Topics Determination of When / When Not to Collect Samples Sample
More informationWeed Mapping in Ku-ring-gai Council
Current methods for mapping weed densities in bushland areas 23 May 2007 Evelyn Baker 1 Background Development of bushland weed assessment guidelines Qualitative assessment of the level of weeds in bushland
More informationSite Description. Supplies (* = optional)
Site Description Overview Regardless of the activities conducted at a site, the first visit to the monitoring plot, the site description must be completed, including identifying the plot boundaries, describing
More informationMETHODS PAPER: River Transect Sampling of Physical Attributes Downstream of the Mactaquac Generating Station
Mactaquac Aquatic Ecosystem Study Report Series 2015-014 METHODS PAPER: River Transect Sampling of Physical Attributes Downstream of the Mactaquac Generating Station Mark Gautreau, Ben Wallace, and Tommi
More informationMinnesota Stewardship Spatial Analysis Project Methodology and Analysis documentation January 28, 2008
Minnesota Stewardship Spatial Analysis Project Methodology and Analysis documentation January 28, 2008 Summary In the fall of 2004, Minnesota DNR and the U.S. Forest Service began working together to create
More information