June Mark Fiebrandt JTEM Operations Research Analyst

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "June Mark Fiebrandt JTEM Operations Research Analyst"

Transcription

1 June 2010 Mark Fiebrandt JTEM Operations Research Analyst

2 Abstract This tutorial provides background, overview, and status of efforts to produce an overarching process for utilizing a JMT for test and evaluation of systems in a joint environment. This includes a process to decompose JMTs to testable measures that will measure the impact of the system on joint capabilities and warfighter effects. Special emphasis is placed on the methods and processes used for JMT decomposition, demonstrating that JMTs, combined with measures and architectural products, will provide the foundation for a quantifiable operational context and an effective evaluation strategy. Additionally, the case will be made that reusable measures at the mission and task level will standardize and accelerate planning, providing benefit to all end users. Presentation of a use case will illustrate how an initial set of measures was decomposed for the Joint Close Air Support and Joint Personnel Recovery mission threads. The tutorial will also provide the way ahead for making the JMT decomposition to measures process and initial JMT measures available to end users. 2

3 Agenda 1. Joint Environment Requirements 2. Joint Threads 3. Joint Thread Framework 4. Joint Thread Tier 1 Development a) Step 1 Development b) Step 2 Development 5. Joint Thread Tier 2 Development x

4 Agenda x Joint Environment Requirements

5 Joint Environment (JME) Joint Environment (JOE): The environment of land, sea, and/or airspace within which a joint force commander employs capabilities to execute assigned missions. (JCIDS Manual, Jul 2009) Joint Environment (JME): A subset of the joint operational environment composed of force and non-force entities; conditions, circumstances and influences within which forces employ capabilities to execute joint tasks to meet a specific mission objective. (JCIDS Manual, Jul 2009) 6

6 Joint Environment (JME) Relation to Joint Thread Development Joint Environment (JME): A subset of the joint operational environment composed of force and non-force entities; conditions, circumstances and influences within which forces employ capabilities to execute joint tasks to meet a specific mission objective. (JCIDS Manual) Independent variables (test factors) SoS configurations System attributes DOTMLPF Conditions: - Environment & Threat Varied across test trials Constants s Functions Constant across test trials Dependent variables measures measures System/SoS Attribute measures Measure changes across test trials A joint mission thread (JMT) is an operational and technical description of the end to end set of activities and systems that accomplish the execution of a joint mission. (CJCSI E) 7

7 Agenda x Joint Threads

8 Why Joint Threads Focuses the community on needed warfighting capability Provides the tester with a blueprint for the needed test environment Test Architecture, /Metrics, Systems, Forces, TTPs, Nets, Info Exchange, Instrumentation Provides the joint operational context for a System-of- Systems JMTs required to provide operational context for Joint Analysis, Assessments, Training, Experiments, T&E and M&S BUT Jointly validated, fully documented JMTs don t exist!

9 JMT Development Products Tier 1: JMT generic data description totally JMT: AV-1(High Level), OV-1, OV-2, OV-4, OV-5a, reusable architecture-based info sets SV-1,, High-Level Executable Architecture (EA) & IV Tier 2: JMT Strands : (Additional) AV-1 (Specific), OV-2, OV-3, OV-4, OV-5b, OV-6c, SV-1, SV-3, SV-5s, SV-6, SV-10c, SvcV-3, SvcV-5, Baseline EA, or documents that show: Node/System Pairing Message Order Distributions Timings Decision processes System attributes System Functionality (IAW JCSFL) Information Exchange Requirements (IERs) Message composition Interoperability Matrix Data Exchange Requirements (DERs) System Capabilities JMT Strand Tier 2 information represents specific documentation required to answer a particular question or solve a problem. JMT Strands are unique JMT segments that will have specific actors for each node, might use a Service-specific set of TTPs or CONOPS, may be AOR-specific or use a unique set of systems and apps all subset of Tier 1 information (OV-5, SV-1, etc.). Tool suite will include S-CAE, Architecture-Driven Analysis (ADA) EAs, augmented by: Joint Doctrine Education and Training Electronic Information System (JDEIS) Joint Common System Function List (JCSFL) Joint Style Guide (Army s Joint Test Threads +)

10 JFCOM s Joint Thread (JMT) Proposed Initial List Initial JMT List Counter IED Joint Close Air Support (JCAS) Air and Missile Defense Joint Personnel Recovery (JPR) CND/CNA/CNE EW/EA CWMD Global Force Management Medical Evacuation Joint Suppression of Air Enemy Defense (JSEAD) Joint Fires Time Sensitive Targeting Anti Air Warfare Interdiction Counter Mine Mine Operations Counter Drug Amphibious Assault Tactical Airlift PSYOP Maritime Interception Defensive Countermeasures Military Deception Non Combat Evacuation Non-Lethal Attack Joint Context to Clarify Joint Requirements & Improve Interoperability and Integration Joint Close Air Support Source: JFCOM J89 JMT Development located at > AKO Home > Joint Thread Architectures & Testing Working Group > Joint Thread Architectures & Testing Working

11 Agenda x Joint Thread Framework

12 JCIDS Joint Capability Definition Capability: The ability to achieve a desired effect under specified standards and conditions through combinations of means and ways across DOTMLPF to perform a set of tasks to execute a specified course of action Ref. - CJCSI G, Mar 2009 Desired Effects to achieve Set of s Combinations of Means and Ways to perform The ability of: means and ways under specified standards and conditions to perform a set of tasks in order to achieve desired effects 13

13 Joint Capability Definition Impact on Standards & Conditions Desired Effect The ability to achieve a desired effect under specified standards and conditions through combinations of means and ways across DOTMLPF to perform a set of tasks to execute a specified course of action Means & Ways s

14 WHAT Joint Capability Definition Impact on WHEN & WHERE Standards & Conditions WHY Desired Effect The ability to achieve a desired effect under specified standards and conditions through combinations of means and ways across DOTMLPF to perform a set of tasks to execute a specified course of action WHO & HOW Means & Ways s

15 WHAT Joint Capability Definition Impact on Standards = measures + criteria WHEN & WHERE Standards & Conditions Conditions = environment + threat + Joint WHY Desired Effect The ability to achieve a desired effect under specified standards and conditions through combinations of means and ways across DOTMLPF to perform a set of tasks to execute a specified course of action WHO & HOW Means & Ways possess functions s

16 WHAT Joint Capability Definition Impact on Standards = measures + criteria WHEN & WHERE Standards & Conditions Conditions = environment + threat + Joint WHY Desired Effect The ability to achieve a desired effect under specified standards and conditions through combinations of means and ways across DOTMLPF to perform a set of tasks to execute a specified course of action WHO & HOW Means & Ways possess functions s

17 Reference Model What Why Desired Effects Performance Non-Materiel Materiel Who How Who How well / Attributes Functions SoS How functional Set of Conditions Threat Environment Joint Capability System Functions System SoS/System Attributes to cause to perform possess Activities Effects Functions Performer Standards evaluated by 18

18 Functional Requirements and Requirements and JMT Definition Examples Measure military effect (mission accomplishment)* Warfighter Requirements Desired effect Isolate the adversary : (1) Enemy accessibility to C2 (2) Blue systems operability Measure military effect (task performance) Warfighter Performance Requirements Activity CAS employment : (1) Employments where achieved desired target damage (2) Employments where information exchanges were timely SoS Measure SoS functionality SoS Functional Requirements SoS Parameter Services interoperability : (1) Services functional over time (2) User access to services System Measure System functionality System Functional Requirements System Parameter Suitability : (1) System reliability (2) System supportability *Source: DOT&E memo dtd 6Jan2010, Reporting of OT&E Results 19

19 Purpose The JMT are intended to evaluate causality of applying military capabilities to achieve mission desired effects.

20 Agenda x Joint Thread Development

21 JMT Tier 1 Decomposition WHEN & WHERE Tier 1 assess mission effects and task performance of generic operational nodes in a joint mission Standards & Conditions WHY Decomposition = Desired Effects Attributes The ability to achieve a desired effect under specified standards and conditions through combinations of means and ways across DOTMLPF to perform a set of tasks to execute a specified course of action WHO & HOW Means & Ways Nodes Decomposition WHAT = Sub-tasks Attributes

22 JMT Tier 1 Decomposition Desired Effects Matrix 1 Attributes Matrix 2 Nodes OV-1 Matrix 3 s Matrix 4 Attributes Matrix 7 s & Activities Decomposition Matrix 8 Joint/Service Lists Matrix 5 Joint/Service List Matrix 6

23 Agenda x Joint Thread Development STEP 1

24 JMT Tier 1 Decomposition Desired Effects Matrix 1 Attributes Matrix 2 Nodes OV-1 Matrix 3 s Matrix 4 Attributes Matrix 7 s & Activities Decomposition Matrix 8 Joint/Service Lists Matrix 5 Joint/Service List Matrix 6

25 Step 1: Decomposition Desired Effects Attributes 1. : The task, together with the purpose, that clearly indicates the action to be taken and the reason therefore. (JP 1-02) 2. Statement: A mission describes the organization s essential task (or tasks) and purpose a clear statement of the action to be taken and the reason for doing so. (UJTL Manual Aug 2008) Short sentence or paragraph that describes the organization's essential task (or tasks) and purpose-a clear statement of the action to be taken and the reason for doing so. (JP 5-0) statement contains the elements of who, what, when, where, and why, but seldom specifies how. (JP 5-0) Example: Conduct an integrated joint close air support with a common and standardized doctrine, organization, training, materiel and facilities that will be interoperable and effective in a joint mission environment. (JP 5-0) 3. objectives: (JP 5-0) The mission is then further defined with objectives, that are: The clearly defined, decisive, and attainable goal toward which every operation is directed. The specific target of the action taken (for example, a definite terrain feature, the seizure or holding of which is essential to the commander s plan, or an enemy force or capability without regard to terrain features). Examples: (1) To delay, disrupt, destroy, or degrade enemy operational forces or critical tasks and facilities (including command, control, and intelligence (C2I) targets), (2) To affect the enemy's will to fight

26 Step 1: Decomposition Desired Effects Attributes Sources of Information: JMT All View 1 (AV-1) Joint Doctrine Analytic Agenda OPLANs/CONOPS Example: : Joint Personnel Recovery statement: Prevent, plan, prepare, execute, and adapt military, diplomatic, and civil efforts to conduct Joint Personnel Recovery for isolated personnel who are separated (as an individual or group) from their unit while participating in a USsponsored military activity or mission and who are, or may be, in a situation where they must survive, evade, resist, or escape in order to recover and reintegrate those isolated personnel into their organization. (Source: JP3-50) Objectives: (Source: JPR JMT) Protect the force Enable military missions Defeat adversary attempts to exploit a known asymmetric vulnerability

27 Step 1: Decomposition Desired Effects Attributes Definition - Desired Effects: The Joint Operation Planning Process, discusses the use of desired and undesired effects in joint operation planning as a way to clarify the relationship between objectives and tasks. (JP 5-0) Effects describe system behavior in the operational environment desired effects are the conditions related to achieving objectives; and tasks direct friendly action. (CBA Guide v3) Examples: (1) Threat forces destroyed or neutralized in JOA (2) Enemy unwillingness to fight Sources of Information: JMT All View 1 (AV-1) Joint Doctrine Analytic Agenda OPLANs/CONOPS

28 Step 1: Decomposition Desired Effects Attributes Guidelines: Follow the JMT All View 1 (AV-1) Use other sources as needed (Joint Doctrine, Analytic Agenda, OPLANs/CONOPS) Ensure the effects describe system behavior in the operational environment Map to mission objectives Ask the question, If I can achieve this desired effect, then I will have helped to accomplish my mission objective? Example: (For Joint Personnel Recovery JMT) Desired Effects: (Source: JP 3-50, pg ix) Return isolated personnel to duty Sustain morale Increase operational performance Deny adversary the opportunity to influence our military strategy and national will by exploiting the intelligence and propaganda value of isolated personnel

29 Step 1: Decomposition Desired Effects Attributes Matrix 1

30 Step 1: Decomposition Desired Effects Attributes Definition - Attributes: An attribute is defined as a quantitative or qualitative characteristic of an element or its actions At the mission level, the focus is on describing actions When appropriate, SWarF prioritized attributes associated with relevant JCAs should be used. Sources of Information: JMT All View 1 (AV-1) Joint Doctrine Analytic Agenda OPLANs/CONOPS

31 Step 1: Decomposition Desired Effects Attributes Guidelines: Start with mission desired effect Pick out modifying language that characterizes the activity Match this language with a measureable attribute (SWarF, other attribute lists) Should be at least one attribute for each desired effect Example: (For Joint Personnel Recovery JMT) Desired Effects: Return isolated personnel to duty (Source: JP 3-50, pg ix) Before recovered isolated personnel can be returned to duty they must be medically cleared, complete a SERE/intelligence debrief, and have some form of decompression

32 Step 1: Decomposition Desired Effects Attributes Example (continued): (For Joint Personnel Recovery JMT) Desired Effects: Return isolated personnel to duty (Source: JP 3-50, pg ix) What are the characteristics for this Desired Effect? Returned Medically cleared Debriefed Decompressed What are the possible attribute(s) for this Desired Effect? Completed? Must complete recovery Readiness? Must be ready for duty

33 Step 1: Decomposition Desired Effects Attributes Matrix 2

34 Step 1: Decomposition Desired Effects Attributes Definition - : measures are intended to measure effects. The data used for evaluation are appropriately called measures of effectiveness, because they measure the military effect (mission accomplishment) that comes from the use of the system in its expected environment. (DOT&E memo, dated Jan 06, 2010) Sources of Information: JMT All View 1 (AV-1) Joint Doctrine Analytic Agenda OPLANs/CONOPS

35 Step 1: Decomposition Desired Effects Attributes Guidelines: Start with mission attribute definition Keep measures simple. Write according to guidelines in UJTL Manual Determine the scale (time, length, quality, etc) Should be at least one measure for each attribute Example: (For Joint Personnel Recovery JMT) Desired Effects: Return isolated personnel to duty (Source: JP 3-50, pg ix) Attribute: Readiness Readiness is a state of preparedness of forces or weapon system or systems to meet a mission or to engage in military operations

36 Step 1: Decomposition Desired Effects Attributes Example (continued): (For Joint Personnel Recovery JMT) Desired Effects: Return isolated personnel to duty (Source: JP 3-50, pg ix) Attribute: Readiness What are the characteristics for this Attribute? Trained personnel Material condition Supplies Number of units (personnel) available What are the possible measures for this Attribute? Percent Of JPR missions where key personnel where properly trained Percent Of JPR missions where adequate resources where available Readiness is based on adequate and trained personnel, material condition, supplies/reserves of support system and ammunition, numbers of units available, etc (DAU Glossary, 13th Edition Nov 2009)

37 Step 1: Decomposition Desired Effects Attributes Matrix 3

38 Agenda x Joint Thread Development STEP 2

39 JMT Tier 1 Decomposition Desired Effects Matrix 1 Attributes Matrix 2 Nodes OV-1 Matrix 3 s Matrix 4 Attributes Matrix 7 s & Activities Decomposition Matrix 8 Joint/Service Lists Matrix 5 Joint/Service List Matrix 6

40 Step 2: Decomposition Nodes Activities * Joint/Service Lists List *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Definition Nodes: Attributes The operational nodes are those key functional nodes required to perform the mission Key nodes should be shown in the OV-1 Each operational node is provided a functional title that is not system specific Example: An operational node may be shown as a - strike aircraft. Identifying the node as a F/A-18, would be incorrect for a Tier 1 JMT Sources of Information: JMT View 1 (OV-1) Guidelines: Use the JMT View 1 (OV-1) Ensure the operational nodes are generic and not system specific Organizational names are OK if it is a joint organization that will not differ in the JMT Tier 2s

41 Step 2: Decomposition Nodes Activities * Joint/Service Lists List Statement *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Prevent, plan, prepare, execute, and adapt military, diplomatic, and civil efforts to conduct Joint Personnel Recovery for isolated personnel who are separated (as an individual or group) from their unit while participating in a US-sponsored military activity or mission and who are, or may be, in a situation where they must survive, evade, resist, or escape in order to recover and reintegrate those isolated personnel into their organization. Objectives Protect the force Enable military missions Attributes Defeat adversary attempts to exploit a known asymmetric vulnerability Desired Effects Return isolated personnel to duty Sustain morale Increase operational performance Deny adversary the opportunity to influence our military strategy and national will by exploiting the intelligence and propaganda value of isolated personnel to help achieve Adapt Execute Plan Prepare Prevent s Provides the ability to perform

42 Nodes *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Definition Activities: Activities * Joint/Service Lists Attributes List A task is an action or activity. When we discuss activities, we are really referring to tasks. (Note: DoDAF 2.0 uses the term activities ) s can be decomposed to multiple levels as needed Sub-tasks Sub-sub-tasks First level of tasks should be found in the OV-1 Step 2: Decomposition OV-2 Search Team Matrix 4 4. Execute Sources of Information: First level of tasks should be found in the OV-1 Lower level task decomposition should be in OV-2s and OV-5s PRCC 3. Plan 4. Execute 5. Adapt JPRC 1. Prevent 2. Prepare 3. Plan 4. Execute 5. Adapt DPMO 4. Execute BCD 4. Execute

43 Step 2: Decomposition Nodes *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Activities * Joint/Service Lists Attributes List Matrix 4 Guidelines: Use the JMT Views OV-2 and OV-5 Use other sources as needed Use operational nodes, not system specific Map subordinate tasks as needed. Stop when all sub-tasks have same nodes Sub-tasks Sub-sub-tasks Example: Use the Execute - Locate sub-task

44 Step 2: Decomposition Nodes Activities * Joint/Service Lists List *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Matrix 4 Attributes

45 Nodes *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Definition Joint/Service Lists: Activities * Joint/Service Lists Attributes List Universal Joint List (UJTL) is a documented list of joint tasks Service task lists also exist from each Service that documents Service specific tasks. Note: Air Force no longer maintains a task list Sources of Information: Step 2: Decomposition Matrix 5 Joint Doctrine, Education, & Training Electronic Information System Joint and Service task lists provide an authoritative source for existing task descriptions and measures

46 Step 2: Decomposition Nodes *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Guidelines: Activities * Joint/Service Lists Attributes List Matrix 5 Example: Start with the primary joint task that the JMT is based on (ex. JPR JMT is based on TA 6.2: Execute Personnel Recovery Operations). Determine which supporting joint and service tasks listed in the primary joint task can be mapped to sub-tasks in the JMT. Focus mostly on operational and tactical tasks, as strategic national and strategic theater tasks will probably not help in identifying JMT task measures Consider supporting tasks listed in other relevant joint tasks as possible tasks to include in the matrix. When in doubt on listing a task, do it. It may produce good measures Execute Locate sub-task

47 Step 2: Decomposition Nodes Activities * Joint/Service Lists List *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Matrix 5 Attributes

48 Step 2: Decomposition Nodes Activities * Joint/Service Lists List *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Definition Joint/Service List : Attributes Matrix 6 Joint and Service Lists provide measures for each task Joint/Service List measures support task measure decomposition, but are not assumed to be complete and sufficient The intent is to identify and list those task measures for possible use in the JMT Sources of Information: Joint Doctrine, Education, & Training Electronic Information System Joint and Service task list measures can provide a basis for development of the JMT task measures

49 Step 2: Decomposition Nodes Activities * Joint/Service Lists List *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Guidelines: Attributes Matrix 6 List measures documented in each Joint and Service task identified in matrix 5 Eliminate duplicates when they exist, but maintain mapping to relevant tasks Example: Execute Locate sub-task

50 Step 2: Decomposition Nodes Activities * Joint/Service Lists List *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Matrix 6 Attributes

51 Step 2: Decomposition Nodes Activities * Joint/Service Lists List *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Definition - Attributes: An attribute is defined as a quantitative or qualitative characteristic of an element or its actions At the task level, the focus is still on describing actions When appropriate, SWarF prioritized attributes associated with relevant JCAs should be used Sources of Information: JMT All View 1 (AV-1) and Views (OVs) Joint Doctrine Analytic Agenda OPLANs/CONOPS Joint/Service Lists (Matrix 5) Attributes Matrix 7

52 Step 2: Decomposition Nodes Activities * Joint/Service Lists List *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Guidelines: Attributes Matrix 7 Every task has multiple dimensions of performance that can be observed and the criteria to specify an acceptable level of performance for each dimension. At a minimum, most tasks can be measured in terms of the time required to initiate or to complete a task (i.e. response time), the rate at which progress is being made (e.g., rate of movement), an overall level of completion or success (e.g., of fires to target) in terms of power (e.g., engagement range), lethality (e.g., rate transmitted). Key dimensions of task performance should be found in the commander s guidance and concept of operations. Source: UJTL Manual, Appendix B, Enclosure B, page 4 Some Common Attributes Timeliness: The time required to initiate or to complete a task (i.e. response time) Effectiveness: The rate at which progress is being made in a task(e.g., rate of movement) Completion: An overall level of completion or success with a task(e.g., of fires to target) in terms of power (e.g., engagement range) Lethality: The rate of kill in a task (e.g., P k ) Accuracy: The degree of precision in a task

53 Step 2: Decomposition Nodes Activities * Joint/Service Lists List *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Guidelines: Attributes Matrix 7 Review warfighter requirements for task performance attributes. Review related Joint and Service tasks listed in Matrix 6 for relevant attributes. Consider the commonly used task attributes. Develop task descriptions from JMT products and joint doctrine. Use to identify potential task attributes. Ask the question, Does the task need to be (insert the attribute)? to verify if the attribute is appropriate to evaluating the task. Ensure there are at least one attribute for each task. Attributes mapped to sub-tasks should also map to the parent task. Example: Execute Locate- Execute Search Plan sub-task Attributes Attributes System/SoS Attributes Development Flow

54 Step 2: Decomposition Example: (For Joint Personnel Recovery JMT) 4.0 Locate s 4.1 Execute Search Plan: Determine the location and status of the isolated personnel (precisely find; fast response) 4.2 Verify/Fuse Location: Verify and fuse isolated personnel s location information to provide accurate and reliable coordinates for refining recovery plans. Goal is for latest, most reliable location information. 4.3 Authenticate IP: Authenticate isolated personnel using ISOPREP data and other methods 4.4 Share Location: Use available information to refine isolated personnel s location with reliable and accurate information What are the characteristics for the sub-task: 4.1 Execute Search Plan? Accuracy Of executing the search plan Timeliness In executing the search plan Goodness In how well conducted the search plan What are the characteristics for the task: 4.0 Locate? Accuracy Of information provided Timeliness In performing the task to provide IP location Goodness In providing the IP information Information Reliability Of the IP information Completeness Of the IP information Matrix 7

55 Step 2: Decomposition Nodes Activities * Joint/Service Lists List *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Matrix 7 Attributes

56 Step 2: Decomposition Nodes Activities * Joint/Service Lists List *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Matrix 8 Attributes Definition - : Each task will have measures associated with it that will evaluate an attribute measures should provide the basis for meeting warfighter requirements for performing tasks These measures will be referred to as Sources of Information: JMT All View 1 (AV-1) and Views (OVs) Joint Doctrine Analytic Agenda OPLANs/CONOPS Joint/Service List (Matrix 6)

57 Step 2: Decomposition Nodes Activities * Joint/Service Lists List *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Guidelines: Matrix 8 Attributes Write measures utilizing the general guidance provided in UJTL Manual. Use established measures from task lists only when appropriate. There should be at least one measure identified for each attribute. Determine a scale and description for each measure. may span numerous level of tasks; ex. A measure of timeliness for a sub-task may also require a measure of timeliness for the parent task. A short list of measures is often better than a long list of measures. Example: (For Joint Personnel Recovery JMT) Execute Locate Execute Search Plan sub-task

58 Step 2: Decomposition Example: (Execute Locate Execute Search Plan sub-task) 4.0 Locate s 4.1 Execute Search Plan: Determine the location and status of the isolated personnel (precisely find; fast response) 4.2 Verify/Fuse Location: Verify and fuse isolated personnel s location information to provide accurate and reliable coordinates for refining recovery plans. Goal is for latest, most reliable location information. 4.3 Authenticate IP: Authenticate isolated personnel using ISOPREP data and other methods 4.4 Share Location: Use available information to refine isolated personnel s location with reliable and accurate information What are possible measures for this sub-task: 4.1 Execute Search Plan? Accuracy: Percent - Of instances where search was executed according to plan Timeliness: Time - To commence search from time tasked Time To locate IP Goodness: Percent Of instances where IP was located What are possible measures for the task: 4.0 Locate? Accuracy: Percent - Of instances where shared info = ground truth Matrix 8 Timeliness: Time To execute Locate task when resulted in accurate info Percent Of instances where able to locate IP within given time (Source:TA 6.2) Goodness: Percent Of instances where IP was located Info Reliability: Percent Of instances where improved/maintained info reliability Completeness: Percent Of instances where shared info was complete

59 Step 2: Decomposition Nodes Activities * Joint/Service Lists List *Note: For identifying relevant tasks. See Joint/Service List description Matrix 8 Attributes

60 JMT Tier 1 Decomposition Desired Effects Matrix 1 Attributes Matrix 2 Nodes OV-1 Matrix 3 s Matrix 4 Attributes Matrix 7 s & Activities Decomposition Matrix 8 Joint/Service Lists Matrix 5 Joint/Service List Matrix 6

61 JMT Tier 1 Decomposition Impact on System Testing - Example Joint Thread: Joint Personnel Recovery System under Test: F/A-18 Node: Search Aircraft Relevant s: 4.0 Locate 4.1 Execute Search Plan 4.2 Verify/Fuse location Relevant : Matrix 8 measures Relevant : Matrix 3 measures

62 Agenda x Joint Thread Development Tier 2

63 JMT Tier 2 Decomposition WHEN & WHERE Tier 2 assess System & SoS functionality within Standards a specific JMT Tier 2 strand and its & impact on mission Conditions effects and task performance WHY Decomposition = Desired Effects Attributes The ability to achieve a desired effect under specified standards and conditions through combinations of means and ways across DOTMLPF to perform a set of tasks to execute a specified course of action Decomposition WHAT = Sub-tasks Attributes WHO & HOW Convert Means & Ways Nodes to specified Systems that establishes a SoS configuration

64 JMT Tier 2 Decomposition

65 Linked slides

66 Battlespace Awareness ISR Comprehensive Persistent Survivable Integrated Timely Credible Adaptable Innovative C2 Interoperability Understanding Timeliness Accessibility Simplicity Completeness Agility Accuracy Relevance Robustness Trust Environment Comprehensive Timely Integrated Persistent Credible Survivable Adaptable Innovative Information Transport Enterprise Services Net-centric Net Management Information Assurance Accessible Accessible Accessible Security Capacity Interoperable Dynamic Available Accurate Survivable Flexible Timely Timely Timely Agile Accurate Throughput Reliable Integrated Visible Expeditionary Accurate Maintainable Responsive Latency Relevant Complete Controllable Deployment & Distribution Visibility Scalable Reconfigurable Complete Responsive Robust Supply Responsivene ss Maintain Logistics Logistics Services Contract Support Engineering Sustainability Responsiveness Responsiveness Effective Reliability Sustainability Responsiveness Attainability Attainability Expeditionary Velocity Flexibility Attainability Sustainability Flexibility Agile/Tailorable Precision Survivability Flexibility Flexibility Survivability Networked Capacity Attainability Economy Economy Sustainability Integrated Economy Survivability Survivable Simplicity Precise Simplicity Simplicity Simplicity Economy SwarF Prioritized List of Attributes (Source: JCIDS Appendix A, Enclosure A) Enduring/ Persistence

67 Back-up Charts 68

68 Joint 1. : The task, together with the purpose, that clearly indicates the action to be taken and the reason therefore. (JP 1-02) 2. Statement: A mission describes the organization s essential task (or tasks) and purpose a clear statement of the action to be taken and the reason for doing so. (UJTL Manual Aug 2008) Short sentence or paragraph that describes the organization's essential task (or tasks) and purpose-a clear statement of the action to be taken and the reason for doing so. (JP 5-0) statement contains the elements of who, what, when, where, and why, but seldom specifies how. (JP 5-0) Example: Conduct an integrated joint close air support with a common and standardized doctrine, organization, training, materiel and facilities that will be interoperable and effective in a joint mission environment. (JP 5-0) 3. objectives: (JP 5-0) The mission is then further defined with objectives, that are: The clearly defined, decisive, and attainable goal toward which every operation is directed. The specific target of the action taken (for example, a definite terrain feature, the seizure or holding of which is essential to the commander s plan, or an enemy force or capability without regard to terrain features). Examples: (1) To delay, disrupt, destroy, or degrade enemy operational forces or critical tasks and facilities (including command, control, and intelligence (C2I) targets), (2) To affect the enemy's will to fight 4. Desired Effects: The Joint Operation Planning Process, discusses the use of desired and undesired effects in joint operation planning as a way to clarify the relationship between objectives and tasks. (JP 5-0) effects describe system behavior in the operational environment desired effects are the conditions related to achieving objectives; and tasks direct friendly action. (CBA Guide v3) Examples: (1) Threat forces destroyed or neutralized in JOA (2) Enemy unwillingness to fight 69

69 Joint 1. : MOEs assess changes in system behavior, capability, or operational environment. They measure the attainment of an end state, achievement of an objective, or creation of an effect; they do not measure task performance. (JP 5-0) Examples: (1) Percent of enemy forces destroyed, delayed, disrupted, or degraded, (2) Percent of enemy forces that desert or surrender 2. : A task is an action or activity (derived from an analysis of the mission and concept of operations) assigned to an individual or organization to provide a capability. (UJTL Manual, Aug 2008) MOPs assess friendly actions that is tied to measuring task accomplishment. (JP 1-02) Generally quantitative, but also can apply qualitative attributes to task accomplishment. (JP 5-0) MOPs are used in most aspects of combat assessment, since it typically seeks specific, quantitative data or a direct observation of an event to determine accomplishment of tactical tasks. But MOPs have relevance for noncombat operations as well (e.g., tons of relief supplies delivered or noncombatants evacuated). (JP 5-0) MOPs also can be used to measure operational and strategic tasks, but the type of measurement may not be as precise or as easy to observe. (JP 5-0) Examples: (1) Time to get ordnance on target after initiating air-to-surface attack request (2) Number targets attacked IAW requests for fires 70

70 Terms of Reference Activity: An Activity is work, specific to a single organization, weapon system, or individual, that transforms inputs into outputs or changes their state. (DoDAF 2.0) Attribute: A quantitative or qualitative characteristic of an element or its actions. (CJCSI G) Capability: The ability to achieve a desired effect under specified standards and conditions through combinations of means and ways across DOTMLPF to perform a set of tasks to execute a specified course of action (CJCSI G, Mar 2009) Condition: (1) Those variables of an operational environment or situation in which a unit, system, or individual is expected to operate and may affect performance. (UJTL Manual), (2) The sample of adversaries and operating conditions the scenario (Capability-Based Assessment User s Guide v3 dated Mar 2009) Criterion: The minimum acceptable level of performance associated with a particular measure of [task] performance. It is often expressed as hours, days, percent, occurrences, minutes, miles, or some other command-stated measure. (UJTL Manual Aug 2008) Effect [ Desired]: (JP 1-02) (1) The physical or behavioral state of a system that results from an action, a set of actions, or another effect, (2) The result, outcome, or consequence of an action, (3) A change to a condition, behavior, or degree of freedom 71

71 Terms of Reference Function [System/] : The action for which a person or thing is specially designed, fitted, used or intended to accomplish or execute. (DoDAF 2.0) Joint Environment : A subset of the joint operational environment composed of force and nonforce entities; conditions, circumstances and influences within which forces employ capabilities to execute joint tasks to meet a specific mission objective. (TSSG) Joint Thread: An operational and technical description of the end to end set of activities and systems that accomplish the execution of a joint mission. (CJCSI E) KPP/KSA/CTP: Attributes/parameters of a system that are considered critical (JCIDS) Means: (1) Forces, units, equipment, and resources (TOR for JCA reassessment), (2) Solutions represent means, or resources that can be employed (Capability-Based Assessment User s Guide v3 dated Mar 2009), (3) Means are based on DOTMLPF organization, materiel, personnel, & facility resources Measure: A parameter that provides the basis for describing varying levels of accomplishment. (UJTL Manual Aug 2008) Measure of Effectiveness []: A criterion used to assess changes in system behavior, capability, or operational environment that is tied to measuring the attainment of an end state, achievement of an objective, or creation of an effect (JP 1-02) 72

72 Terms of Reference Measure of Performance []: A criterion used to assess friendly actions that is tied to measuring task accomplishment. (JP 1-02) Measure of System/SoS Attribute: A parameter that describes varying levels of attributes. (CTM) : The task, together with the purpose, that clearly indicates the action to be taken and the reason therefore. (JP 1-02) Node: An element of a system that represents a person, place, or physical thing. (JP 1-02) : An action or activity (derived from an analysis of the mission and concept of operations) assigned to an individual or organization to provide a capability. (UJTL Manual Aug 2008) Note: This term and its definition to be included in JP 1-02 Standard: A standard provides a way of expressing the acceptable proficiency that a joint organization or force must perform under a specified set of conditions. A standard consists of one or more measures for a task and a criterion for each measure. (UJTL Manual Aug 2008) System: A functionally, physically, and/or behaviorally related group of regularly interacting or interdependent elements; that group of elements forming a unified whole. (JP 1-02) Ways: (1) Doctrine, tactics, techniques, and procedures, competencies, and concepts (TOR for JCA reassessment), (2) Functions [are] considered ways (Capability-Based Assessment User s Guide v3 dated Mar 2009), (3) Ways are based on DOTMLPF doctrine, training, and leadership. 73

Net-Ready Key Performance Parameter (NR-KPP) Implementation Guidebook

Net-Ready Key Performance Parameter (NR-KPP) Implementation Guidebook Net-Ready Key Performance Parameter (NR-KPP) Implementation Guidebook Version 1.0 1 October 2009 Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development, and Acquisition) Chief Systems Engineer Department

More information

ITEA Live, Virtual, Constructive Conference Paper

ITEA Live, Virtual, Constructive Conference Paper ITEA Live, Virtual, Constructive Conference Paper Recommendations Regarding Initial Guidelines for the Minimum Requirements Necessary for System Representations Used in the Joint Mission Environment (JME

More information

Interoperability Developmental Test & Evaluation Guidance

Interoperability Developmental Test & Evaluation Guidance Developmental Test & Evaluation Guidance May 2017 DT&E Initiative Team BLUF DT&E Guidance Include interoperability as part of overall DT&E strategy, developed early Outline DT&E activities in the TEMP

More information

Enterprise Architecture as an Essential Tool Supporting Army Transformation. Fernando Mezquita

Enterprise Architecture as an Essential Tool Supporting Army Transformation. Fernando Mezquita Enterprise Architecture as an Essential Tool Supporting Army Transformation Fernando Mezquita There are two ways of spreading light: to be the candle or the mirror that reflects it. Edith Wharton, 1862-1937

More information

U.S. Army Evaluation Center. Mission Based T&E. NDIA 26 th T&E Conference. 4 March 10

U.S. Army Evaluation Center. Mission Based T&E. NDIA 26 th T&E Conference. 4 March 10 U.S. Army Evaluation Center Mission Based T&E NDIA 26 th T&E Conference 4 March 10 2 Purpose To provide a refresher of the MBT&E methodology. To show how ATEC is moving forward with implementation of the

More information

CONTENT GUIDE FOR THE NET-READY KPP. a. Usage. All IS will follow the NR KPP development process in accordance with this guide and reference jjjj.

CONTENT GUIDE FOR THE NET-READY KPP. a. Usage. All IS will follow the NR KPP development process in accordance with this guide and reference jjjj. APPENDIX E TO ENCLOSURE D CONTENT GUIDE FOR THE NET-READY KPP 1. Overview a. Usage. All IS will follow the NR KPP development process in accordance with this guide and reference jjjj. (1) This applies

More information

Advancing Weapons Capabilities in Multi-Domain Environments

Advancing Weapons Capabilities in Multi-Domain Environments Advancing Weapons Capabilities in Multi-Domain Environments March 28, 2017 Presented to: PSAR 2017 Presented by: RADM Mark Darrah PEO(U&W) NAVAIR Public Release 2017-201 Distribution Statement A - "Approved

More information

Requirements Driven Test Design:

Requirements Driven Test Design: Requirements Driven Test Design: Quickly Aligning to the Third Offset Strategy Melanie DiAntonio Air Academy Associates mdiantonio@airacad.com (757) 338-1191 Requirements Driven Test Design: Quickly Aligning

More information

Integrated Architecture-Based Portfolio Investment Strategies

Integrated Architecture-Based Portfolio Investment Strategies Integrated Architecture-Based Portfolio Investment Strategies 2005 10th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium The Future of C2 Assessment, Tools, and Metrics, #343 June 13,

More information

Mission-Level Systems Engineering

Mission-Level Systems Engineering 6 th Annual DoD Enterprise Architecture Conference Mission-Level Systems Engineering Mr. Ricardo Cabrera ASN (RD&A) CHSENG Hampton, VA 13 Apr 2011 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release;

More information

An Enhanced Analysis of Alternatives (AoA)

An Enhanced Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) An Enhanced Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) A Mission-Oriented, Evaluation-Based Framework for Defense Test & Evaluation Highlighting Emerging Roles for Systems Engineering in Defense Decision Making Abstract

More information

Systems Engineering for the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Tutorial for the 9 th NDIA Systems Engineering Conference

Systems Engineering for the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Tutorial for the 9 th NDIA Systems Engineering Conference Systems Engineering for the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Tutorial for the 9 th NDIA Systems Engineering Conference Agenda and Presenters Introduction to JCIDS Chris Ryder

More information

TOPIC DESCRIPTION SUPPLEMENT for the SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SURVEY DESCRIPTION

TOPIC DESCRIPTION SUPPLEMENT for the SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SURVEY DESCRIPTION 1 2 Objectives of Systems Engineering 3 4 5 6 7 8 DoD Policies, Regulations, & Guidance on Systems Engineering Roles of Systems Engineering in an Acquisition Program Who performs on an Acquisition Program

More information

Scoping Framework: Scoping Projects for Easier Cost Estimating

Scoping Framework: Scoping Projects for Easier Cost Estimating Scoping Framework: Scoping Projects for Easier Cost Estimating Darrin DeReus, Ph.D. Air Force Cost Support Project Manager Senior Cost Analyst 25 July 2014 Purpose Show a current project Discuss the current

More information

Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Implications to End-to-End Assessment

Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Implications to End-to-End Assessment Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Implications to End-to-End Assessment Brian Eleazer Brian Hall Robert Kohout Joint Systems Integration Center U.S. Joint Forces Command 757-203-4421 / 4453 / 7598 John.eleazer@jsic.jfcom.mil

More information

Framework for Future Alliance Operations (FFAO) Workshop - Out Brief

Framework for Future Alliance Operations (FFAO) Workshop - Out Brief Framework for Future Alliance Operations (FFAO) Workshop - Out Brief Originating Office Rome, Italy 28 30 March 2017 1 Agenda Overview Syndicate Presentations Exit Survey Closing Comments Close-out Administrative

More information

Sense and Respond Logistics Capability And Operation Iraqi Freedom

Sense and Respond Logistics Capability And Operation Iraqi Freedom Sense and Respond Logistics Capability And Operation Iraqi Freedom Sense and Respond Logistics Capability (SRLC) Logistics capability that enables faster combat operations by sensing materiel needs and

More information

The Evolution of the Headquarters Effectiveness Assessment Tool (HEAT) and Its Applications to Joint Experimentation

The Evolution of the Headquarters Effectiveness Assessment Tool (HEAT) and Its Applications to Joint Experimentation Technical Paper SUBMITTED TO: 6 th INTERNATIONAL COMMAND AND CONTROL RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY SYSMPOSIUM Department of Defense Cooperative C4ISR Research Program (CCRP) Paper Title: The Evolution of the

More information

MODELING OF LOGISTICS IN COMPUTER ASSISTED EXERCISES

MODELING OF LOGISTICS IN COMPUTER ASSISTED EXERCISES Sławomir BYŁEŃ MODELING OF LOGISTICS IN COMPUTER ASSISTED EXERCISES Abstract: A command post exercise, supported by a computer simulation, is one of the primary training tools available to the Polish Armed

More information

The Measures Handbook

The Measures Handbook The Measures Handbook A Practical Guide for Developing and Analyzing Measures in the Capabilities-Based Assessment, pre-materiel Development Decision Analysis, and Analysis of Alternatives 6 August 2014

More information

A Quantitative Model Driven Comparison of Command Approaches in an Adversarial Process Model

A Quantitative Model Driven Comparison of Command Approaches in an Adversarial Process Model A Quantitative Model Driven Comparison of Command Approaches in an Adversarial Process Model 12TH ICCRTS Adapting C2 to the 21st Century Authors: Robert Regal, Rebecca Reed, Matt Largent PhD Organization:

More information

Dr. Fatma Dandashi October, 2003

Dr. Fatma Dandashi October, 2003 Systems Technical Operational DoD Architecture Framework Overview Dr. Fatma Dandashi October, 2003 Outline Policy and Guidance on Architecture History of the Framework Framework Definitions and Purpose

More information

12 TH ICCRTS. Adapting C2 to the 21 st Century. Operational Assessment of Effects Based Strategies

12 TH ICCRTS. Adapting C2 to the 21 st Century. Operational Assessment of Effects Based Strategies 12 TH ICCRTS Adapting C2 to the 21 st Century Operational Assessment of Effects Based Strategies Proposed approaches to measurement Assessment in Effects Based Operations Tools for Effects Based Assessment

More information

Architecture Based Analysis of System ility Synergies and Conflicts

Architecture Based Analysis of System ility Synergies and Conflicts Architecture Based Analysis of System ility Synergies and Conflicts Barry Boehm, Jo Ann Lane, USC Kevin Sullivan, U. Virginia NDIA Systems Engineering Conference October 30, 2013 10 30 2013 1 Outline Critical

More information

Architecture Modeling Approach for Net-Centric Enterprise Services

Architecture Modeling Approach for Net-Centric Enterprise Services Architecture Modeling Approach for Net-Centric Enterprise s (C4ISR/C2 Architecture Track, Paper #60) Yun-Tung Lau, Ph.D.*, Michelle TJ King (SAIC) Walter J. Okon and David Kye (DISA/NE) June, 2005 NCES

More information

Commander s Handbook for Assessment Planning and Execution

Commander s Handbook for Assessment Planning and Execution Commander s Handbook for Assessment Planning and Execution Version 1.0 Joint Staff, J-7 Joint and Coalition Warfighting Suffolk, Virginia 9 September 2011 DEPUTY DIRECTOR, J-7 JOINT STAFF JOINT AND COALITION

More information

Systems Characterization: An Approach to Modernizing Disparate Legacy Systems

Systems Characterization: An Approach to Modernizing Disparate Legacy Systems Systems Characterization: An Approach to Modernizing Disparate Legacy Systems Jane Orsulak Julie Kent April 30, 2015 Copyright 2015 Raytheon Company. All rights reserved. Customer Success Is Our Mission

More information

Systems Engineering Forum

Systems Engineering Forum The 16th Annual National Systems Engineering Forum Sponsored by the National Defense Industrial Association Systems Engineering Division October 30, 2013 An Integrating Framework for Supporting Systems

More information

A UAV MISSION HIERARCHY C. E. NEHME M.L. CUMMINGS J. W. CRANDALL

A UAV MISSION HIERARCHY C. E. NEHME M.L. CUMMINGS J. W. CRANDALL A UAV MISSION HIERARCHY C. E. NEHME M.L. CUMMINGS J. W. CRANDALL MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY* PREPARED FOR CHARLES RIVER ANALYTICS HAL2006-09 DEC, 2006 \ http://halab.mit.edu e-mail: halab@mit.edu

More information

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation 73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation 712CD For office use only 41205 21-23 June 2005, at US Military Academy, West Point, NY Please complete this form 712CD as your cover

More information

NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT SUPPORT TOOL (NIMCAST) SELF-ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT 6

NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT SUPPORT TOOL (NIMCAST) SELF-ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT 6 NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT SUPPORT TOOL (NIMCAST) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT SUPPORT TOOL (NIMCAST)

More information

..._ I Page lof 13 ~ LOG200 Intermediate Acquisition Logistics lesson 2.6- Evaluate Product Support Capabilities- Metrics. Welcome to Metrics

..._ I Page lof 13 ~ LOG200 Intermediate Acquisition Logistics lesson 2.6- Evaluate Product Support Capabilities- Metrics. Welcome to Metrics lesson 2.6- Evaluate Product Support Capabilities- Metrics RESOURCES I PRIMT I HELP Welcome to Metrics This lesson addresses the development of system sustainment metrics that will be used in the evaluation

More information

Applying Executable Architectures to Support Dynamic Analysis of C2 Systems

Applying Executable Architectures to Support Dynamic Analysis of C2 Systems 2004 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium The Power of Information Age Concepts and Technologies Applying Architectures to Support Dynamic Analysis of C2 Systems C2 Assessment & Tools,

More information

Department of the Navy. Enterprise Architecture Federation Pilot Initiative. Final Report

Department of the Navy. Enterprise Architecture Federation Pilot Initiative. Final Report Department of the Navy Enterprise Architecture Federation Pilot Initiative Final Report Version 1.0 May 2008 Version History Version Publication Date Author Description of Change 1.0 31 December 2007 DON

More information

Operational Requirements Document (ORD)

Operational Requirements Document (ORD) Operational Requirements Document (ORD) A. Purpose This Appendix sets the requirements and establishes procedures for preparation of an Operational Requirements Document (ORD). It also prescribes procedures

More information

Request for Solutions: Air Defense Artillery Long-Term Evolution Orientation Device Amendment 1 April 12 th, 2018

Request for Solutions: Air Defense Artillery Long-Term Evolution Orientation Device Amendment 1 April 12 th, 2018 1. Purpose Request for Solutions: Air Defense Artillery Long-Term Evolution Orientation Device Amendment 1 April 12 th, 2018 This Request for Solutions is issued to identify a unique solution for an Air

More information

An Enhanced Analysis of Alternatives (AoA)

An Enhanced Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) An Enhanced Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) A Mission-Oriented, Evaluation-Based Framework for Defense Test Evaluation NDIA March 2-5. 2009 Vince Roske Institute for Defense Analyses vroske@ida.org 703

More information

Future Logistics Enterprise

Future Logistics Enterprise Future Logistics Enterprise A year ago in the Spectrum, Mr. Alex Smirnow and I summarized the Department of Defense efforts to define a future logistics architecture, driven by operational needs and requirements.

More information

Quantifying the FBCF and Energy Key Performance Parameter

Quantifying the FBCF and Energy Key Performance Parameter Helping Clients Succeed Quantifying the FBCF and Energy Key Performance Parameter Richard Goffi NDIA E2S2 Denver, CO June 14, 2010 Congress has directed that energy performance be baked in to force planning,

More information

Making Stability Operations Less Complex While Improving Interoperability

Making Stability Operations Less Complex While Improving Interoperability Making Stability Operations Less Complex While Improving Interoperability 13th ICCRTS: C2 for Complex Endeavors Paper 168 Mr. Erik Chaum Naval Undersea Warfare Center (401) 832-6915 ChaumE@npt.NUWC.Navy.mil

More information

Architecture-Based Concept Evaluation in Support of JCIDS

Architecture-Based Concept Evaluation in Support of JCIDS Air Force Institute of Technology Architecture-Based Concept Evaluation in Support of JCIDS Dave Jacques, Ph.D. John Colombi, Ph.D. NDIA 10th Annual Systems Engineering Conference 22-25 Oct 07 1 Architecture

More information

Capability Brief. Slide Alban Station Blvd Suite B-258 Springfield, VA Main: Fax:

Capability Brief. Slide Alban Station Blvd Suite B-258 Springfield, VA Main: Fax: Capability Brief. Slide 1 Who we are? Knowledge Capital Associates, LLC (KCA) is a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) founded in 2009 to uncover, harness, and apply knowledge and expertise

More information

Operational Logistics On Demand

Operational Logistics On Demand Operational Logistics On Demand Charles Largay IBM Global Services September 24th, 2003 Enterprise Integration 2002 IBM Corporation On-Demand is a benefit to DOD if it leads to doing following better:

More information

VIEWPOINT MORE RESILIENT POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT) THROUGH OPEN ARCHITECTURE AND ANALYTICS

VIEWPOINT MORE RESILIENT POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT) THROUGH OPEN ARCHITECTURE AND ANALYTICS VIEWPOINT MORE RESILIENT POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT) THROUGH OPEN ARCHITECTURE AND ANALYTICS MORE RESILIENT POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT) THROUGH OPEN ARCHITECTURE AND ANALYTICS

More information

Designing Optimal Organizational Structures for Combat Information Centers in the Next Generation of Navy Ships

Designing Optimal Organizational Structures for Combat Information Centers in the Next Generation of Navy Ships Designing Optimal Organizational Structures for Combat Information Centers in the Next Generation of Navy Ships Michael J. Paley* Yuri N. Levchuk Daniel Serfaty Jean MacMillan Aptima, Inc. 600 West Cummings

More information

S&T/IR&D to Support Development Planning. NDIA 16 th Annual Systems Engineering Conference 30 October John Lohse NDIA DPWG Chair (520)

S&T/IR&D to Support Development Planning. NDIA 16 th Annual Systems Engineering Conference 30 October John Lohse NDIA DPWG Chair (520) NDIA Development Planning Working Group Update: Improving the Integration of Government and Industry S&T/IR&D to Support Development Planning NDIA 16 th Annual Systems Engineering Conference 30 October

More information

Request for Solutions: High Energy Laser (HEL) Flexible Prototype. 11 December 2018

Request for Solutions: High Energy Laser (HEL) Flexible Prototype. 11 December 2018 Request for Solutions: High Energy Laser (HEL) Flexible Prototype 11 December 2018 1.0 Purpose The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC) seeks a prototype groundbased Laser Weapon System (LWS)

More information

Collaborative, Predictive, Responsive Analysis and Production

Collaborative, Predictive, Responsive Analysis and Production Collaborative, Predictive, Responsive Analysis and Production IMAGERY IMAGERY INTELLIGENCE GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE OUR PEOPLE THE NSG Technology and Capabilities The National System

More information

Modeling Cognition in the DoD Architecture Framework for Early Concept Development

Modeling Cognition in the DoD Architecture Framework for Early Concept Development Air Force Institute of Technology Modeling Cognition in the DoD Architecture Framework for Early Concept Development John Colombi, PhD John.colombi@afit.edu NDIA 11 th Systems Engineering Conference 20-23

More information

One of the most important activities in the Production and Deployment phase is Test and

One of the most important activities in the Production and Deployment phase is Test and 1 One of the most important activities in the Production and Deployment phase is Test and Evaluation. And, as HSI practitioners, you should be right in the middle of these activities. iti You need to verify

More information

Project Report Template (Sem 1)

Project Report Template (Sem 1) 1. Introduction & Problem Statement Project Report Template (Sem 1)

More information

Software Systems Technology Conference

Software Systems Technology Conference Capabilities Composition Software Systems Technology Conference 22 April 2009 Mr. Terry Simpson Space & Naval Warfare Systems Center Atlantic terry.simpson@navy.mil (843) 218 5630 DSN 312 588 5630 Agenda

More information

Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP)

Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) A. Purpose The Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) is the basic top-level planning document for Test and Evaluation (T&E) related activities for major acquisition

More information

Net-Centric Information Management

Net-Centric Information Management Net-Centric Information Management Dr. Scott Renner sar@mitre.org 13 June 2005 2003 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved Net-Centric Warfare Seamless interoperability The network is only the beginning!

More information

Implementation of the Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) Engineering Body of Knowledge (BoK)

Implementation of the Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) Engineering Body of Knowledge (BoK) Implementation of the Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) Engineering Body of Knowledge (BoK) Andrew Monje Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering 20th Annual NDIA Systems

More information

Range Sustainment Enterprise Range Information Systems: Building the Foundation for a DoD Range Enterprise. March 2006

Range Sustainment Enterprise Range Information Systems: Building the Foundation for a DoD Range Enterprise. March 2006 Range Sustainment Enterprise Range Information Systems: Building the Foundation for a DoD Range Enterprise March 2006 Agenda The Range Information Enterprise Initiative Context Vision Enterprise Analysis

More information

Continuity of Operations (COOP) Multi-Year Strategy and Program Management Plan Template Guide

Continuity of Operations (COOP) Multi-Year Strategy and Program Management Plan Template Guide Continuity of Operations (COOP) Multi-Year Strategy and Program Management Plan Template Guide Federal Emergency Management Agency 500 C ST, SW Washington, D.C. 20472 FEMA GUIDE INSTRUCTIONS This guide

More information

Applying Semantic Technology to Early Stage Defense Capability Planning Analysis Based on JCIDS Artifacts

Applying Semantic Technology to Early Stage Defense Capability Planning Analysis Based on JCIDS Artifacts Applying Semantic Technology to Early Stage Defense Capability Planning Analysis Based on JCIDS Artifacts Allen Moulton amoulton@mit.edu Sociotechnical Systems Research Center 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge,

More information

DoD Hazmat Business Process Reengineering: Environment, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH) Transformation

DoD Hazmat Business Process Reengineering: Environment, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH) Transformation DoD Hazmat Business Process Reengineering: Environment, Safety Occupational Health (ESOH) Transformation Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations Environment ODUSD(I&E) Business

More information

Decision Support for Robotic and Autonomous Systems

Decision Support for Robotic and Autonomous Systems Decision Support for Robotic and Autonomous Systems 1. Introduction The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, due to great expenditures by commercial firms and military research, brings promise

More information

JAMES MPHAHLELA THABA ABSTRACT

JAMES MPHAHLELA THABA ABSTRACT TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT FOR MILITARY CAPABILITY BASED ACQUISITION JAMES MPHAHLELA THABA Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Defence Peace Safety and Security, South Africa Jthaba@csir.co.za ABSTRACT

More information

International System Safety Training Symposium

International System Safety Training Symposium International Safety Training Symposium Functional Hazard Analysis (FHA) Tutorial 5 August 2014 Mr. Adam Scharl NSWCDD, 540-653-7940 adam.scharl@navy.mil Mr. Kevin Stottlar NSWCDD, 540-653-7301 kevin.stottlar@navy.mil

More information

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Work in this project is performed by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL), Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Work in this project is performed by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL), Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied Research COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014 FY

More information

Transforming Logistics Through Performance-Based Logistics

Transforming Logistics Through Performance-Based Logistics Transforming Logistics Through Performance-Based Logistics AFEI EXPO 23 September 2003 Jerry Beck Office of Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Logistics Plans & Programs) Amateurs talk about

More information

The Forgotten -Ilities. James D. Willis, Jr. SPEC Innovations Balls Ford Road Suite 230 Manassas VA 20109

The Forgotten -Ilities. James D. Willis, Jr. SPEC Innovations Balls Ford Road Suite 230 Manassas VA 20109 The Forgotten -Ilities James D. Willis, Jr. SPEC Innovations 10440 Balls Ford Road Suite 230 Manassas VA 20109 Topics What is an -Ility? How might we organize -Ilities? How Should Systems Engineers View

More information

IBG GSA Schedule. IBG's GSA Schedule 70 contract number is: GS-35F-0546W

IBG GSA Schedule. IBG's GSA Schedule 70 contract number is: GS-35F-0546W IBG GSA Schedule IBG's GSA Schedule 70 contract number is: GS-35F-0546W Labor Categories Biometric Engineer -- $161.70 Biometric Engineer II -- $162.93 Biometric Engineer III -- $190.86 Biometric Architect

More information

Downloaded from

Downloaded from Naval Systems of Systems Systems Engineering Guidebook Volume I Prepared by the Office of the ASN (RDA) Chief Systems Engineer 6 November 2006 i. Foreword The Naval Systems of Systems Systems Engineering

More information

System Security Engineering and Program Protection Case Study for the Materiel Solution Analysis Phase Tutorial Exercises

System Security Engineering and Program Protection Case Study for the Materiel Solution Analysis Phase Tutorial Exercises System Security Engineering and Program Protection Case Study for the Materiel Solution Analysis Phase Tutorial Exercises Melinda Reed Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering

More information

NGB-J6/CIO CNGBI DISTRIBUTION: A 13 August 2012 NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU (NGB) JOINT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

NGB-J6/CIO CNGBI DISTRIBUTION: A 13 August 2012 NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU (NGB) JOINT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT CHIEF NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU INSTRUCTION NGB-J6/CIO CNGBI 6000.01 DISTRIBUTION: A NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU (NGB) JOINT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT Reference(s): See Enclosure C. 1. Purpose.

More information

T&E of Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Opportunities of Evaluating Trust Don Strausberger. Georgia Tech Research Institute March 2017

T&E of Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Opportunities of Evaluating Trust Don Strausberger. Georgia Tech Research Institute March 2017 T&E of Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Opportunities of Evaluating Trust Don Strausberger Georgia Tech Research Institute March 2017 Ongoing Autonomy Science & Technology Programs (1 of 3) Domains Ongoing

More information

MANAGING SUPPLY CHAIN RISKSTO DOD SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS Thomas Barth, Michelle Albert, and Elizabeth McDaniel

MANAGING SUPPLY CHAIN RISKSTO DOD SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS Thomas Barth, Michelle Albert, and Elizabeth McDaniel MANAGING SUPPLY CHAIN RISKSTO DOD SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS Thomas Barth, Michelle Albert, and Elizabeth McDaniel The Problem Global supply chains are vulnerable to attack or manipulation. If an adversary compromises

More information

Dr Craig Smith & Herlinde Franklin Concepts Team MBDA

Dr Craig Smith & Herlinde Franklin Concepts Team MBDA Dr Craig Smith & Herlinde Franklin Concepts Team MBDA Presentation at Defence Research Conference 24 th March 2010 Ref.: Page 1-4/9/10 Scope of Presentation Background Cooperative Weapons principles Example

More information

Mission-based Test and Evaluation Modeling and Simulation for Mission TAB Review Based Test and Evaluation (MBT&E) Presented by: Beth Ward

Mission-based Test and Evaluation Modeling and Simulation for Mission TAB Review Based Test and Evaluation (MBT&E) Presented by: Beth Ward U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command Mission-based Test and Evaluation Modeling and Simulation for Mission- 2010 TAB Review Based Test and Evaluation (MBT&E) Presented by: Beth Ward

More information

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS CIVIL-MILITARY OPERATIONS SCHOOL WEAPONS TRAINING BATTALION TRAINING COMMAND 2300 LOUIS ROAD (C478) QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5036 STUDENT OUTLINE STABILITY ASSESSMENT

More information

DoD Architecture Framework

DoD Architecture Framework wreath stars Text DoD Architecture Framework Version 2.03 Volume 1: Overview and Concepts Manager s Guide NORMATIVE 07 December 2012 i ii This page left intentionally blank Executive Summary The Department

More information

Joint Logistics Strategic Plan

Joint Logistics Strategic Plan Joint Logistics Strategic Plan 2010 2014 1 Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response,

More information

ECONOMIC BENEFITS ANALYSIS

ECONOMIC BENEFITS ANALYSIS www.caskllc.com The Other-Side of Cost ECONOMIC BENEFITS ANALYSIS By: Paul Gvoth 2013 Cask LLC. All rights reserved. The Cask name and logo are registered trademarks. All content contained in this document

More information

DOD INSTRUCTION BUSINESS SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS AND ACQUISITION

DOD INSTRUCTION BUSINESS SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS AND ACQUISITION DOD INSTRUCTION 5000.75 BUSINESS SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS AND ACQUISITION Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Effective: February 2, 2017 Change

More information

The Role of T&E in the Requirements Process for System of Systems

The Role of T&E in the Requirements Process for System of Systems The Role of T&E in the Requirements Process for System of Systems Walter C. Reel Test Engineer NSWCDD - W33 walter.reel@navy.mil http://www.ctc.com/learnaboutctc/sosce.cfm 1 The Problem Charlie Chaplin

More information

The Future of C2. Command and Control Information Management Strategy (CIMS) provided by an Information Integration Framework.

The Future of C2. Command and Control Information Management Strategy (CIMS) provided by an Information Integration Framework. 10 th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium The Future of C2 Command and Control Information Management Strategy (CIMS) provided by an Information Integration Framework C2

More information

Combat Simulation Techniques for Analysis of Future Battlefield Digitisation

Combat Simulation Techniques for Analysis of Future Battlefield Digitisation Combat Simulation Techniques for Analysis of Future Battlefield Digitisation Duncan Tailby; Rebecca Cause; Colin Stanford Land Operations Division, DSTO duncan.tailby@dsto.defence.gov.au rebecca.cause@dsto.defence.gov.au

More information

Human Behavior in the Infantry Warrior Simulation (IWARS)

Human Behavior in the Infantry Warrior Simulation (IWARS) Human Behavior in the Infantry Warrior Simulation (IWARS) Applications of BRIMS Alicia Borgman General Dynamics Information Technology Objectives IWARS Overview HBR in IWARS Future HBR Development Directions

More information

Forging the Center of Gravity. Major Troy E. Mitchell

Forging the Center of Gravity. Major Troy E. Mitchell Forging the Center of Gravity Major Troy E. Mitchell 413 White Columns Way Wilmington, North Carolina 28411 mitchelltroye@gmail.com A. A. Milne 1 Within military planning courses, doctrine teaches Dr.

More information

Supporting a Multinational BCT Commander

Supporting a Multinational BCT Commander Soldiers from Delta Troop, 1st Squadron, 91st Cavalry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade, conduct a mission brief on April 17, 2016, before a logistics resupply mission during exercise Saber Junction 16

More information

The Information Technology (IT) Box A Primer

The Information Technology (IT) Box A Primer The Information Technology (IT) Box A Primer Sources: CJCSI 5123.01H, 31 Aug 2018 JCIDS Manual, 31 Aug 2018 Patrick Wills Dean, Defense Systems Management College Defense Acquisition University work: 703-805-4563

More information

The Forgotten -ilities Balls Ford Road Balls Ford Road Manassas VA Manassas VA 20109

The Forgotten -ilities Balls Ford Road Balls Ford Road Manassas VA Manassas VA 20109 The Forgotten -ilities James D. Willis, Jr. Dr. Steven Dam SPEC Innovations SPEC Innovations 10440 Balls Ford Road 10440 Balls Ford Road Manassas VA 20109 Manassas VA 20109 Topics What is an -Ility? How

More information

Executable Architectures for Modeling Command and Control Processes (C2 Modeling and Simulation Track)

Executable Architectures for Modeling Command and Control Processes (C2 Modeling and Simulation Track) A Paper submitted to the 2006 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium "The State of the Art and the State of the Practice" Executable Architectures for Modeling Command and Control Processes

More information

FEATURES. 12 Army Sustainment

FEATURES. 12 Army Sustainment FEATURES 12 Army Sustainment Additive manufacturing employs computer-aided design and manufacturing capabilities to create objects through layer-by-layer printing. (Photo by Amanda Dunford) By Capt. MuShawn

More information

Think Enterprise: Delivering Culture Change. Mr. Bob Fecteau US Army INSCOM CIO

Think Enterprise: Delivering Culture Change. Mr. Bob Fecteau US Army INSCOM CIO This Briefing is UNCLASSIFIED This Briefing is UNCLASSIFIED Think Enterprise: Delivering Culture Change Presented to: Enterprise Integration Expo 23 September 2003 Mr. Bob Fecteau US Army INSCOM CIO 703-428-4613

More information

LtGen Gary Hughey Deputy Commander

LtGen Gary Hughey Deputy Commander USTRANSCOM United States Transportation Comm LtGen Gary Hughey Deputy Commer USTRANSCOM One Team One Fight First in, last out, always there 24/7 ops for America Everyday! Single Process with a Single Purpose

More information

Using System-of-Systems Simulation Modeling and Analysis to Measure Energy KPP Impacts for Brigade Combat Team Missions

Using System-of-Systems Simulation Modeling and Analysis to Measure Energy KPP Impacts for Brigade Combat Team Missions Using System-of-Systems Simulation Modeling and Analysis to Measure Energy KPP Impacts for Brigade Combat Team Missions June 2010 Kimberly M. Welch Sandia National Laboratories Jessica Kerper Sandia National

More information

Development, Validation and Implementation Considerations of a Decision Support System for Unmanned & Autonomous System of Systems Test & Evaluation

Development, Validation and Implementation Considerations of a Decision Support System for Unmanned & Autonomous System of Systems Test & Evaluation Development, Validation and Implementation Considerations of a Decision Support System for Unmanned & Autonomous System of Systems Test & Evaluation Test Week 2010 Kris Cowart, Maj, USAF Ricardo Valerdi,

More information

(JCTD Title & Acronym) FY

(JCTD Title & Acronym) FY Sample CDB Briefing (JCTD Title & Acronym) FY Candidate Decision Review (CDR) (Date) Participants COCOM Sponsor: (organization) Oversight Executive: (name) Operational Manager: (organization & name) Technical

More information

Model Path Analysis as a Basis for Evaluating Command and Control (C2) Workflow

Model Path Analysis as a Basis for Evaluating Command and Control (C2) Workflow 14 th Annual ICCRTS June 15 17, 2009 Model Path Analysis as a Basis for Evaluating Command and Control (C2) Workflow Paul North Dave Glock Bill Reiske Steve Forsythe Maritime Operations Center Vision &

More information

A Real-Time Community-of-Interest (COI) Framework for Command-and- Control Applications

A Real-Time Community-of-Interest (COI) Framework for Command-and- Control Applications A Real-Time Community-of-Interest (COI) Framework for Command-and- Control Applications Ray Paul Department of Defense Washington, DC raymond.paul@osd.mil 5/22/2004 1 Agenda Requirements of COIs COI architecture

More information

1 October 2017 Automatic Information Technology (AIT) & In-Transit Visibility (ITV) 101

1 October 2017 Automatic Information Technology (AIT) & In-Transit Visibility (ITV) 101 1 October 2017 Automatic Information Technology (AIT) & In-Transit Visibility (ITV) 101 Together, we deliver. 1 USTRANSCOM Component Commands Unified Commands SDDC JECC Gen. Darren W. McDew Commander,

More information

Current State of Capability-based System of Systems Engineering in Korea Ministry of National Defense

Current State of Capability-based System of Systems Engineering in Korea Ministry of National Defense Current State of Capability-based System of Systems Engineering in Korea Ministry of National Defense Jae-Hong Ahn 1, Yeunseung Ryu 2 and Doo-Kwon Baik 3 1 Agency for Defense Development, Korea koreaseman@daum.net

More information

AeroVironment, Inc. Unmanned Aircraft Systems Overview. Background

AeroVironment, Inc. Unmanned Aircraft Systems Overview. Background AeroVironment, Inc. Unmanned Aircraft Systems Overview Background AeroVironment ( AV ) is a technology company with a 40-year history of practical innovation in the fields of unmanned aircraft systems

More information

Lessons Learned. Applying Architecture. to the. Acquisition of. Air Force. Command and Control Systems

Lessons Learned. Applying Architecture. to the. Acquisition of. Air Force. Command and Control Systems Lessons Learned in Applying Architecture to the Acquisition of Air Force Command and Control Systems Murray E. Daniels AF Electronic Systems Center Chief Architect The MITRE Corp. Burlington Rd, Bedford

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM SECNAV INSTRUCTION 4101.3A DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1 000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-1000 SECNAVINST 4101.3A ASN (EI&E) From: Subj: Ref: Encl: Secretary of the Navy DEPARTMENT

More information