The simplification measures for EMAS companies in Europe and in Germany
|
|
- Elvin Cross
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The simplification measures for EMAS companies in Europe and in Germany 1
2 Sommario 1 Introduction to the case study Motivation of case-study Background Methodology Description of survey sample The simplification measure Description of the measure Description of the characteristics of the sector within the region Analysis Analysis of the level of application of a measure Analysis of Adopters benefits Environmental benefit analysis Analysis of the achieved results at the macro level Satisfaction analysis
3 1 Introduction to the case study Germany is undoubtedly the most important European countries for supporting to uptake the adoption of EMAS scheme among companies.. The EMAS registered companies in Germany are more than 1.300; the main sectors of these companies are Services (NACE code 90) (9%), Manufacture of chemicals and chemical product (around 8% - NACE code 20), Waste collection, treatment and disposal activities; materials recovery (around 7%-NACE code 38 ) Accommodation (around 4% NACE code 55). Many companies also operate in metals field, mechanic and automotive field and others. In these years, many initiatives were carried out at regional and national level to remove the typical drawbacks affecting EMAS adoption. For instance, there are 100 simplification measures for EMAS and ISO companies in Germany: 30 measures are implemented at national level by Federal Government and 70 measures are implemented at Lander level by the regional Authorities. One relevant example is the Federal Law selected for the case study is Ordinance of 24 June 2002, Enacting and Amending Ordinances, under Immission Control and Waste Law. The Ordinance aims to define a set of simplification measures and regulatory relief to simplify the administrative procedures concerning the environmental management (such as permit and monitoring activity) of companies. This Law reduced the commitment of firms in the administrative procedure and in the monitoring activities provided in other previous regulations. Because of Germany is the main European country for number of EMAS companies and number of simplification measures and incentives, this case study aim to investigate the level of knowledge and satisfaction concerning the simplification measures adopted in Germany. Furthermore, we compare the level and effect of EMAS adoption as well as the perception about the existing simplification measures between German companies and EMAS companies from other European countries (except Italy). 1.1 Motivation of the case-study As we above mentioned Germany is undoubtedly the most important European countries for supporting to uptake the adoption of EMAS scheme among companies. Since the first EMAS regulation, Germany has always recognized EMAS as an important instruments for companies to improve environmental performance. Data on EMAS registration highlight that Germany was always the first countries for number of registered organization and site, even if in the last years, Italy and Spain have achieved good results. 3
4 Figure 1 EMAS organization and sites This commitment is deduced also by considering the number of simplification measures adopted in Germany. Starting from 1996 the German Authorities implemented over 100 simplified measures to support the dissemination the EMAS and ISO certification and to award the companies The main type of measure is the reduction of reporting and monitoring requirements (17%) and public procurement (17%). The national Authority implemented also measures aiming to reduce inspections information requested for issuing an environmental permit. An important example of these initiatives is the Ordinance of 24 June 2002, Enacting and Amending Ordinances, under Immission Control and Waste Law. The Ordinance was adopted by the Federal Government and focused on environmental management of the productive companies. It promotes simplification measures to simplify permitting procedures and frequency of monitoring activities on emission and hazardous incidents. 4
5 1.2 Background The relevance of simplification measures for companies with environmental certification was already in the first studies and research focusing on the EMAS and ISO companies. For instance Morrow and Rondinelli (2002) 1 have investigated the main reasons of EMS adoption. By citing the results of a survey carried out by German Federal Environmental Agency, they confirm that EMAS or ISO companies perceive benefits and experience positive impacts from implementing environmental management systems and among these benefits there are the regulatory reliefs. A study carried out by the Multi-State Working Group on 50 private and public facilities that developed EMS as pilot projects in the United States, found that 89% of the publicly-traded corporations and 67% of the privately-owned businesses adopted EMS because they were mandated or encouraged to do so by their parent organizations (UNC-ELI, 2001). Companies in the sample reported strong motivations for adopting an EMS arising from expectations of improving regulatory compliance or achieving regulatory benefits. In one of the few large-scale surveys of companies adopting EMS and pollution prevention practices, Florida and Davidson (2001) 2 asked executives of 214 manufacturing companies in Pennsylvania what motivated them to do so. They found that the strongest motivator was the commitment to environmental improvement (91.9%), followed by the opportunity to attain corporate goals and objectives (88.7%), economic benefits and improved business performance (87.1%), State and federal regulatory climate and other regulatory benefits (85.5% and 83.9) and improved community relations (85.5%). 1.3 Methodology The methodology to assess the level of EMAS adoption, its benefit and drawbacks, mainly on the existing simplification measures, is based on a questionnaire survey among the EMAS registered companies operating in Germany and in Europe. The aim of the methodology is to obtain the perception of companies on EMAS scheme and on the role of simplification measures in the EMAS adoption. The following steps can be identified: i) identification of EMAS company list; ii) questionnaire design; iii) data collection; iv) data analysis. The first step was to identify the European EMAS companies in order to define the statistical population of the survey by analyzing the official EMAS register available on DG environment web site. Since our focus are industrial companies we excluded public authorities from the scope of the survey. The exclusion is justified by the fact that public authorities usually do not carry out 1 D. Morrow and D. Rondinelli (2002) Adopting Corporate Environmental Management Systems:Motivations and Results of ISO and EMAS Certification European Management Journal Vol. 20, No. 2, pp , April Florida, R. and Davidson, D. (2001) Gaining from green management: Environmental management systems inside and outside the factory. California Management Review 43(3),
6 activities that are in the scope of the simplification measures. Moreover, they are mainly the promoter of simplification measures in the regulation, so the survey could generate confusion in the responder of public authorities. Moreover, we excluded also Italian organization since they are involved in a ad-hoc survey. Starting from the European database of EMAS companies, that contains data about 4518 registered organizations (July 2012)3, companies were selected and a statistical population of 3154 firms was identified. The survey was carried out by using the e-tool Survey Monkey, a software for on line interviews. The questionnaire is composed by 6 sections and 29 questions included personal data of respondents. The first section concerns the organization details and general information on clients, competitors and economic performance. The second section aims to evaluate the level of implementation of EMS requirements. The third section, composed by two questions, aim to assess the environmental performances of companies. The fourth section deals with investments in the last three years. The main sections of the questionnaire are the section 5 and 6 that concern the simplification measures by assessing the level of knowledge and the usefulness of the measures adopted, the incentives and hindrances for EMAS adoption. The questionnaire was also translated in Spanish and Portuguese by two project partners: IAT and Chamber of Commerce of Valencia that promoted the survey among all EMAS companies operating in these two countries by and phone call. All EMAS companies of the selected sample received the questionnaire by ; the first was sent on 8th September 2012 and several reminders were sent until 15th November Description of the survey sample The number of respondents to the survey is 137 companies but only 97 questionnaires contain information that can be processed. Many companies have started to fill in the questionnaire, but they have included only few information that did not allow to make the questionnaires usable. The table 1 shows the geographical distribution of EMAS companies composing our statistical population and how many companies have filled in the questionnaire. In absolute value, the main response rate was achieved among Spanish companies (here, it was important the supporting role conducted by IAT), followed by Germany (15), Austria (12) and Denmark (11). Only one questionnaire came from Finland, Lithuania and Poland. 3 Data source: 6
7 Table 1 Number of EMAS companies contacted and number of respondents for European Member States Country EMAS companies contacted Respondents Austria Bulgarian 2 1 Belgium 39 3 Czech Republic 24 5 Denmark Finland 6 1 France 24 3 Germany Greece 43 3 Ireland 4 2 Lithuania 9 1 Malta 2 1 Norway 4 2 Poland 29 1 Portugal 60 7 Spain United Kingdom 46 7 TOTAL Response rates range from approximately 1% to 50%, with a weighted mean of almost 3,2% (see figure 2). With respect to previous industrial surveys undertaken in the environmental area, this result is low for an survey. For instance, in a review of 183 studies based on business surveys published in academic journals Paxson 4 reports an average response rate of 21%. The response rate is particularly low regarding Germany (around 1%), the country with the highest number of EMAS registrations; few companies participated in the survey respect to number of 4 Paxson MC. Response Rates for 183 Studies. Working Paper Washington State University (1992).Washington State University 7
8 registration in this country (1260 in the manufacturing field). Many other surveys on EMAS realized in Germany have achieved a low level of participation; for instance a survey to judge this new instrument of European environmental policy (Freimann and Schwedes) 5 has obtained a participation around 1% of German EMAS sites. Figure 2: Response rate for European countries The companies involved in the survey are classified in three categories according to their age: i) less than 50 years old, ii) age between 50 and 100 years, iii) more than 100 years old. The age of the interviewed firms is mainly less than 50 years old (71%); 20% of the sample has been founded after the Second World War and only 9 companies (9%) is more than 100 years old (see figure 3). The 5 J.Freimann and R. Schwedes EMAS experiences in German companies: a survey on empirical studies Eco- Management and Auditing Eco-Mgmt. Aud. 7, (2000) 8
9 oldest companies involved in the survey are located in Germany (4) in Austria (3), Spain (2) an France (1), while the majority of young companies is located in Spain (17) and Denmark (8). Figure 3 Age of companies Regarding the organizations size, following the definition of Recommendation 2003/361/EC6, the survey sample was classified in 4 categories according to the number of full-time employees operating in the companies. It can be noted that the sample is mostly composed of medium organizations, employing from 50 to 250 employees (53%). The small firms are 24% of the sample and the large firms are 24%. In the category of small companies 9 can be classifies as micro because employ less than 10 people. 6 The Recommendation 2003/361/EC at article 2 of the Annex defines the category of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Small enterprise is made up of enterprises which employ fewer than 250 persons and which have an annual turnover not exceeding EUR 50 million, and/or an annual balance sheet total not exceeding EUR 43 million. In the SMEs category the Recommendation defines the micro firms as an enterprise which employs fewer than 50 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 10 million. 9
10 Figure 4 Dimension of respondents for number of employees In order to characterize a company in the market arena, several questions were set to investigate, for instance, the position along supply chain, number of competitors, market scope, etc. The first question investigates the position along the supply chain i.e. the phase of the product or service life-cycle in which they operate. The distance from the final consumer is certainly relevant to determine the motivation of adopting EMAS and, in some cases, the satisfaction towards enhancing measure implemented by policy makers. For the 40% of organizations the primary customer is final consumer/ end users, especially for Spanish, German and Danish companies, while 32% of the sample operate in a business-tobusiness market, selling their products to other manufacturing firms; 22% of the organizations provides own products to wholesalers or retailers. Just the 4% of interviewed companies sell own product/service to a facility within the same company (multisite or multinational corporations). By analyzing the German respondents, it emerged that for 7 companies the main client is final consumers and for other 6 is other facilities within the same company. 10
11 Figure 5 Primary customers Another characteristic of the sample organisations that can be emphasised, refers the features of the market in which a company competes such as geographical dimension and number of competitors. About geographical dimension, four categories were identified: local, national, European, international. The 42% of respondents affirms that their most important market is the national one, while the 30% mainly operates at international level. The local market is the main geographical reference for product from the 16% of firms. German companies operate especially at international level (7) and European level (5); Danish and Spanish respondents selected especially the local level. 11
12 Figure 6 Geographical scope of the market To measure the level of market competition, we asked how many competitors a company has with regards to own main commercial product. A respondent could choose selecting the following options: less than 5 competitors; from 5 to 10 and more than 10 competitors. Most of the respondents (47%) operates in a competitive market mainly in Spain, Germany and Austria. This confirms that EMAS is still viewed as an instrument can improve a firm s competitiveness. Figure 7 Level of competition To success in a competitive market, a company can strategically focus on different approach. It can apply a price competition or stress the quality of the product, it can invest on its reputation or construct strong relation with along its supply chain. In detail, we analyzed the competitive variable commonly used by the firm to promote its products on the market. 12
13 The results confirms that EMAS company mainly focus on product quality (very important for the 93% of the respondents); for the 68% of respondents organization s reputation is a very important competitive variable. Less than half of respondents considers price (mainly firms operating in UK, Czech Republic and Spain) and relation with suppliers as a key competitive variable. Reputation is very important for 10 German companies involved in the survey and for many enterprises operating in Denmark and Austria. The relationship with suppliers is very important only for 6 German companies, while the others considered this variable moderately or not important. Figure 8 Competitive variables The last question of the first section aim to evaluate the firm s economic performance during the last three years (How would you evaluate the economic performance of your organization during the last three years?). The questionnaire suggests 5 options based on the assessment of firm s revenues: i) revenues were so low that we had major losses; ii) revenues were not enough to cover costs; iii) revenues were enough to break even; iv) revenues were enough to have some profit; v) revenues were well above costs. The results confirms that for majority of EMAS firms the revenues were enough to have some profit (46%) only for the 1% the revenues were so low that we had major losses. For the German respondents 5 firms confirmed that the revenues were well above costs and for 6 enterprises were enough to have some profit. Figure 9Competitive variables Evaluation of economic performances of firms 13
14 14
15 2 The simplification measure 2.1 Description of the measure As we above mentioned, this case studies does not focus on a specific simplification measures but aim to investigate the level of knowledge and satisfaction concerning the simplification measures adopted in Germany and in Europe. However, in this paragraph we intend to describe the main contents of one of the most important German simplification measure. The Ordinance of 24 June 2002, Enacting and Amending Ordinances, under Immission Control and Waste Law is one of main legislative measure to support EMAS adoption. As it can be deduced by reading the title, the Ordinance modifies existing environmental laws, such as the Authorization Procedure Ordinance published in Federal Law Gazette 1992 I p. 100, including several benefits for EMAS organizations, in the following fields: waste management and controls (section 1, 2,4 and 5); emissions of volatile organic compounds (section 3); waste recovery (section 6). In detail, the Ordinance provides for the exemption from the air emission control and hazardous incident officers for EMAS firms (section 1 article 3); furthermore, Annual reports pursuant by Act for Promoting Closed Substance Cycle Waste Management and Ensuring Environmentally Compatible Waste Disposal shall not be required if equivalent information emerges from the environmental audit report and operational emission control. Concerning air emission monitoring the competent authority should not require measurements until after expiration of a longer period than three years in the case of EMAS facilities; the competent authority should,moreover, allow the operator of an EMAS facility to perform measurements using its own personnel (If the personnel is qualified). This simplification is provided for other monitoring activities and for different types of plant (as firing plants, incineration plants for waste and others). At the article 7 the Ordinance provides simplification in the reporting activities with the competent authority. Still, the competent authority should extend by one year in each case the intervals for measurements on EMAS companies provided for the emissions of highly volatile halogenated organic compounds (article 8). The Ordinance valorizes also the environmental statement as a tool to inform and disseminate the environmental performance of EMAS firm among local stakeholder and Public Authorities. The section2 deals with another important field of simplification measures such as to support EMAS firms I permit renewal by using information included in the environmental statement or audit report. Specific simplification measures concerning the transfer and storage of motor gasoline and the end-of-life vehicle, are provided for in the section 3 and 4. 15
16 2.2 Description of the characteristics of the sector within the region This case study does not focus on a specific sector or region but analyzes the effectiveness of simplification EMAS for all EMAS registered organizations in Germany and Europe. In EU; the number of EMAS registrations accounts, in the first semester of organizations (figure 10). Germany continues to be the country with the highest number of registrations and the corporate environmental management is on the rise. Nearly companies and organizations have decided to either the European EMAS system or the international standard ISO or one of the many offered to introduce environmental management approaches in use. In Germany, there are currently 16 of these approaches. Many of these, infra EMAS and ISO approaches, addressed mostly in small and medium enterprises 7. In Germany the EMAS organizations are 1838 (September 2012), 40% of the European EMAS registrations. This result can be connected with different strategy for EMAS dissemination implemented in Germany at different territorial level; the main reason for the high number of EMAS registrations in this country can be the presence of simplification measures and incentives adopted at federal and regional level to incentive the EMAS adoption. The German federal states also have a number of environmental management approaches that may not reach the high level of EMAS but are tailored to the needs of certain industries and so help to identify potential for initial savings. They also provide an opportunity to introduce a comprehensive environmental management system step by step and then achieve EMAS. Figure 10 Evolution of EMAS registration 7 UGA, German EMAS Advisory Board, Creating Added Value with EMAS,
17 3 Analysis 3.1 Analysis of the level of application of a measure The survey investigated the level of application of simplification measures in Germany and Europe. Two questions was set to analyze the level of application of measures: the first question investigate the level of knowledge of simplification measures among EMAS companies ( Are you aware of any regional or national regulation simplification for EMAS registered companies? ); the second question intends to quantify how many EMAS organizations have beneficed of simplification measures ( Has your organization ever benefited from simplification since registration? ). The following figures shows the level of awareness on existing simplification measures for EMAS organization in Europe and in Germany. Considering all respondents, 55% of them knows the simplification measures included in the applicable regional or national regulation. This percentage is significantly higher in Germany where the 87% of firms of the sample has a good knowledge of the existing simplifications measures. Good performance emerges also among Austrian organizations, while firms from Spain, Denmark and UK have a level of awareness in line with the average data (50%). On the contrary, a scarce awareness emerge in particular among firms from Czech Republic and Portugal. Figure 11 Level of awareness on existing simplification for EMAS registered companies among European (green) and German (blue) respondents As a consequence of a not full knowledge of the existing simplification, the percentage of firms that has benefited of simplifications is quite low (27%), while in Germany almost 2 EMAS firms of 3 have benefited of at least one simplifications. 17
18 Figure 12 Enterprises that benefited of simplification since registration among European respondents There are several types of simplification measures that policy makers can introduce in their legislation. Among the 14 types of measures identified in the questionnaire, respondents have selected 76 measures, 21 measures were selected by German firms. The main measures used by interviewed companies is Reduction of inspections (25% in Europe) and Self declaration in the procedure of extension of a permission (10%). The result emerged at European level are the same of at German level. In this country the main simplification measures used by EMAS firms are the Reduction of inspections (47%), Self declaration in the procedure of extension of a permission (20%) and Self declaration in the procedure of achieving a permission (20%). Few companies in Europe used measures such as Fast track permit (only one companies in Denmark) or Extension of permit period (only two companies one in Germany and one in Greece). Table 1 Simplification measures used by respondents EU GER EU GER (% on total of measures in UE) (%on total of measures in Germany) Type of measure Self declaration in the procedure of extension of a permission Self declaration in the procedure of achieving a permission % 20% 6 3 6% 20% Reduction of inspections % 47% Dispensation from Administrative Fines 3-3% 0% Extension of permit period 2 1 2% 7% Fast track permits 1-1% 0% 18
19 Modification in the aim of application Information required for permits Reduced reporting and monitoring requirements Reduction of technical reports to the competent body Reduction financial guarantee required for specific activities Advantages in the execution of contracts to supply and / or work with the Public Administration 2-2% 0% 3 1 3% 7% 9-9% 0% 4 1 4% 7% 3 1 3% 7% 5 2 5% 13% Tax Reduction 4 2 4% 13% TOTAL Analysis of Adopters benefits One of the main purposes of the simplification measures for EMAS registered organization is to allow them to achieve resources savings both in terms of human and economic resources. We asked to EMAS organizations What are the advantages due to simplification since your EMAS registration?. The respondents had to select the level of agreement according to the following types of benefits: i) cost reduction; ii) time savings; iii) better relations with competent authorities; iv) stronger motivation to maintain certification; v) other. The following figure show the results emerging among the European respondents: the 52% confirmed (strongly agree) that simplification measures allow to reach relevant time saving employees time; reduction of cost is considered a benefits by 36% (strongly agree) and 54% (agree) of responders. Regarding the remaining options, the answers are equally distributed on the poles: better relations with competent authorities is considered a relevant benefit by 28% of respondents while the24% disagrees with this statement; the same percentage (18%) strongly agrees and disagrees with the statement that simplification measures determine a stronger motivation to maintain certification. By focusing on German respondents, it emerged that the level of agreement is significantly higher than firms from other countries about the improvement of relation with competent authorities. On the opposite, cost reduction is less considered as a benefit achieved by using simplification measures. 19
20 Figure 13 Advantages due to simplification - European and German respondents By benefiting from simplification measures a firm, as highlighted above, could achieve significant savings that could be used for environmental investment. The survey s results found that environmental investments are not changed for the 48% of European respondents (64%) for German firms) while they are increased or significantly increased for the 34% of European EMAS firms and for 21% of German firms. Finally, the investments decreased for the 18% of European respondents and for the 14% of German respondents. 20
21 Figure 14 Organization s investments in the last three years for European and German respondents Since simplification measures can generate significant savings that could be partially use to improve the effectiveness of environmental management system, we compare the answers to the question on environmental investments between firms have benefited to simplification measures (27%) and those did not (64%). The information emerging from the figure below is twofold: from the one hand, we cannot affirm that firms that have benefited to simplifications increase investments more than firms that have not benefited; on the other hand they reduced investment less than firms that have not benefited. Figure 15 Investments for companies that beneficed of simplification or not (European respondents) 21
22 3.3 Environmental benefit analysis Continuous improvement of environmental performance is one of the main aim of an environmental management system. The use of simplification measures does not have a direct effect on environmental performance but, by generating resource savings, this could be used to improve the effectiveness of the management system. In the literature several research have investigated the effect of EMAS adoption on environmental performance (Daddi et al. 2011; Iraldo et al. 2009) 8. For instance, a recent research compared the environmental performance of firms in Latvia before and after the EMAS registration (Tambovceva, 2010) 9 ; another research, by focusing on the environmental performances of German EMAS and ISO firms (Freimann and Schwedes, 2000) 10 found that the implementation of an environmental management system also leads to cost savings and corporate benefits. Furthermore, some research focused on specific industrial sector, for instance Fürst and Oberhofer (2011) 11 carried out a survey on the costs, methods and operating experience of environmental management in the respective companies. Only 43% of 259 participating companies described themselves as environmentally active. Especially larger companies carried out environmental management due to the awareness of its growing importance in the future, image improvement and the distinction from the competitors. In order to measure the environmental improvements generated by EMAS adoption, according to Arimura et. al (2008) we used the following question: With reference to the production unit, what is the environmental improvement attained in the following environmental aspects after implementing EMAS?.The environmental aspects provided in the questions are: energy efficiency; efficiency of the materials; water consumption; waste production; biodiversity; air emissions ; wastewater discharge. At European level (Figure 14), the most relevant improvement are obtained in waste production (40% of respondents declared to have obtained high improvement and 31% declared to have obtained good performance) and in energy efficiency (34% high and 42% good improvement). All respondents from Austria and Denmark declared high and good environmental improvement concerning energy efficiency while the Spanish and English firms achieved high and good results in water consumption. The main benefits concerning the air emission are achieved by English and Danish companies. 8 T. Daddi, M. Magistrelli, M. Frey and F. Iraldo (2011). Do environmental management systems improve environmental performance? Empirical evidence from Italian companies. Environment, Development, Sustainability, Volume 13, Number 5, Pages Iraldo F, Testa F and Frey M (2009), Is an environmental management system able to influence environmental and competitive? The case of the eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) in the European union, Journal of Cleaner Production 17 (2009): pp Tatjana Tambovceva, Assessment model of environmental management: a case study of construction enterprises in Latvia, Economics and Management, , Jurgen Freimann and Roswitha Schwedes, EMAS experiences in German companies: a survey on empirical studies Eco-Management and Auditing, 2000, 7, Elmar Fürst and Peter Oberhofer Environmental management: a brick in the wall of sustainable management - transport for hire or reward and own-account transport on trial,2011 Volume 13 Issue 3 22
23 Figure 16 Environmental improvement for European respondents By focusing on the German respondents, the results show that German firms are more capable to get high improvement on resource efficiency than firms from other countries. Figure 9 Environmental improvement for German respondents 23
24 Concerning the respondents that benefited to simplifications the distribution of answers are quite similar to respondents that did not benefit, except for improvement on energy efficiency performance. Figure 18Environmental improvement for respondents that have benefited and for enterprises that did not benefit of simplification at European level To verify the effectiveness of the environmental management system, we considered the four key elements composing the EMS according to Deming Cycle (Plan Do Check Act): Planning of environmental related activities; Training activities and involvement of employees in environmental matters; Implementation activities of management of environmental issues (including build up and emergency response); Measurements, surveillance and internal control. For each of these aspects composing the environmental management system, the questionnaire proposed three questions that the respondents could evaluate by using the following alternatives: 24
25 not implemented; poor implementation; implementation was started but not completed; good implementation; good implementation of the initiatives and positive evaluation of their effectiveness. Regarding the planning of environmental related activities the assessment is composed by 3 aspects (Figure 19): The environmental policy was effectively disseminated to all employees by 60% of European respondents and by 67% of German respondents; Based on the policy, setting measurable objectives and targets related to the environment was positively implemented by 63% of European respondents and by 67% of German respondents; Initiatives aiming to gather opinions and suggestions coming from the employees as regards the environment was successfully implemented by 25% of European respondents (40% declared also to have a good implementation ) and by 40% of German respondents. Figure 19 Planning activities for European and German respondents By comparing the answers between the respondents that benefited to simplifications and those that did not benefit, a significant difference only emerged on the actions to effectively disseminate the environmental policy. 25
26 Figure 20 Planning activities for respondents that have or not benefited of simplifications Regarding training activities and involvement of employees in environmental matters, the following aspects were taken into account (Figure 22): Incentives to implement the principles and procedures related to environmental protection are offered to employees: 66% of European respondents and 29% of German respondents affirmed to have effectively implemented this kind of initiatives; Project teams coming from different company departments are in charge of solving specific environmental issues: 71% of European respondents and 29% of German respondents affirmed to have effectively implemented this kind of initiatives There is a formalized system to detect any training needs in the environmental field: 65% of European respondents and 36% of German respondents affirmed to have effectively implemented this kind of system. 26
27 Figure 2110 Training activities and the involvement of employees (European and German respondents) No significant difference emerged by comparing the answers between the respondents that benefited to simplifications and those that did not benefit. Figure 11 Training activities and the involvement of employees for respondents that have or not benefited of simplifications Regarding the activities to manage environmental issues, the following initiatives were considered: 65% of European respondents and 43% of German respondents have successfully implemented specific operating instructions for the management of environmental issues; 70% of European respondents and 57% of German respondents have effectively implemented one or more procedures to detect and deal with potential emergency situations; 27
28 66% of European respondents and 43% of German respondents declared to fully re-examine and update emergency response procedures; Figure 23 Management of environmental issues for European and German respondents By comparing the answers between the respondents that benefited to simplifications and they that did not benefit, it seems that not beneficiaries have implemented more deeply actions to manage their environmental aspects. Figure 24 Management of environmental issues for respondents that have or not benefited of simplifications 28
29 Regarding the activities of measuring, monitoring and internal control, the following results emerged: Formal systems to measure the performance in order to detect the degree of achievement of the targets were successfully implemented by 70% of European respondents and by 80% of German respondents; 73% of European respondents and 53% of German respondents have effectively implemented actions to register and investigate non compliance and preventive actions. Moreover, 75% of European respondents and 80% of German respondents constantly and effectively scheduled internal audits to verify the correct implementation of instructions/procedures and the compliance with applicable legal requirements related to the environment. Figure 25 Activities for measurements, surveillance and internal control for European and German respondents By comparing the answers between the respondents that benefited to simplifications and they that did not benefit, it seems that not beneficiaries have implemented more deeply actions to monitor their environmental aspects. Figure 26 Activities for measurements, surveillance and internal control for respondents that have or not benefited of simplifications 29
30 To investigate how EMAS firms monitor their environmental performance, we asked how many performance indicators are used for assessing their environmental aspects. The following alternatives were provided in the questionnaire: only 1 indicator (poorly monitored); 2-3 indicators (sufficiently monitored); over 3 indicators (deeply monitored). Waste production, energy efficiency and wastewater discharge are the most monitored environmental aspect since approximately half of respondents declared to have implemented over three key performance indicators. Few European EMAS firms declared to monitor biodiversity (30% of them selected the answer not applicable ) and efficiency of materials (23% selected the answer not applicable ). For the German respondents, also air emission is deeply monitored by 62% of them while the attention on the environmental aspects biodiversity and efficiency of materials is higher than firms from other European countries. Figure 12 Environmental aspects monitored by European EMAS firms 30
31 Figure 28 Environmental aspects monitored by German EMAS companies 3.4 Analysis of the achieved results at the macro level This paragraph describes the role of simplification measures as incentive for the EMAS adoption and provide useful insights on how the simplification can be a tool to disseminate formal EMS. Several studies have explored the motivations of firms to adopt a certified EMS. These empirical analyses mainly focused on large multinational corporations in the United States and Europe. For instance, Strachan et al. (2003) reviewed the literature on environmental management system motivation and found that an EMS can provide numerous benefits to organizations such as third party assurance and recognition, market access, regulatory relief, improved investor confidence, and enhanced public image and community relations. Furthermore, Morrow (2002), conducted a survey on the motivations of EMAS or ISO adoption by interviewing 5 energy companies; he found that strong motivations for adopting an EMS arising from expectations of improving regulatory compliance or achieving regulatory benefits. The following figure shows, at European and German level, the distribution of answers to the question whether the regulatory simplification was one of the main motivation to adopt EMAS. It is important to underline that m any companies did not answer to this question (74% of European respondents and 60% of German respondents). Only the 3% of European respondents considers the simplifications the main motivation to implement an EMS comply with EMAS; while for the 13% of European and German respondents the simplification is one reason among others. Figure 29 Simplification as a motivation for EMAS adoption (EU and German respondents) 31
32 As a consequence a high number of not answers emerged also for the question on the comparison between regulatory simplification and other aspects as relevant motivation for EMAS adoption, In fact, only the 10% of European respondents and 33% of German respondents, considered the regulatory simplifications as, at least, an important motivation compared with other motivations to adopt EMAS. Figure 13 Importance of simplification compared to the other motivation of EMAS adoption (EU and German respondents) 32
33 3.5 Satisfaction analysis This section investigates the level of satisfaction of EMAS organization towards the existing simplification measures and which new regulatory simplification they wish to have in the legislation. The first element of analysis concerns the difficulties encountered by firms to try to take advantage from the simplification measures. The main difficulties emerging from the survey concern the clarity with which a measure is explained (77% of agreement), the level of communication of the measures (74% of respondents declared at least to agree) t and the delays in the knowledge of the measures (77% of respondents declared at least to agree). Similar results emerged by focusing just on German respondents. Figure 14 Difficulties encountered trying to take advantage of simplification (EU respondents) Figure 15 Difficulties encountered trying to take advantage of simplification (German respondents) 33
34 Regarding suggestions and proposals for new simplification measures, the 27% of European respondents would like to have further tax reductions and the 17% of them wish to have longer duration of environmental permits authorization. The 15% selected also renewal of the authorization by self-certification and reduction of technical reports. Among the German respondents the main suggestion concerns the reduction of technical reports (21%), further tax reductions, reduction of mandatory internal monitoring and longer duration of environmental permits (18%). Figure 25 Suggestions for new simplification measures for European and German respondents Regarding the communication tools and actions to disseminate the existence of simplification measures, there is a similarity of opinions between German respondents and those from other countries. The most preferred tools were periodic update by EMAS competent bodies, dissemination by environmental verifiers, seminaries and conferences. 34
35 Figure 166 Tools for disseminating knowledge on existing simplification measures (EU respondents) The last aspects investigated in the survey concern the role of stakeholders in influencing EMAS organizations to implement environmental actions and which are hindrances and difficulties encountered by firms to implement EMAS requirements. Regarding the first issue, at the European level the stakeholder categories considered as very important are public authorities (44%) and consumers (53%). The categories evaluated as not important are especially trade unions (48%), industries or trade associations (42%) and banks (40%). The German respondents, instead, gave much importance to environmental groups (36%), neighborhood groups (36%), public authorities (36%) and consumers (36%). 35
36 Figure 27 Stakeholders influencing the organization s choice concerning the environmental actions (EU respondents) Figure 28 Stakeholders influencing the organization s choice concerning the environmental actions (German respondents) Regarding the second aspect, the main problems encountered by organization to implement EMAS refers to comply with its requirements (42%) and the high cost of implementation (39%). Other aspects considered as moderately important are especially the personnel involving (52%) and the difficulties in attaining a steady improvement of the environmental performance (47%). The German respondents identified as main difficulties the difficulties deriving from the functioning of the EMAS scheme (45%) and high costs of implementation (45%). 36
37 Figure 17 Hindrances and difficulties encountered by firms implementing EMAS (European respondents) Figure 18 Hindrances and difficulties encountered by firms implementing EMAS (German respondents) 37
Deliverable 3.2 Overview of existing experiences: case studies on simplification measures adopted
Deliverable 3.2 Overview of existing experiences: case studies on simplification measures adopted 1 2 Table of content Introduction... 3 Objectives... 4 Methodology... 4 Cross-Case Study Analysis... 7
More informationEMAS, a premium environmental management tools for organisations Benefits for public authorities
EMAS, a premium environmental management tools for organisations Benefits for public authorities Content 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4 What is EMAS? How can Member States benefit from EMAS? What is the added value
More informationPerformance of Rural Development Programmes of the period - Your Voice
Performance of Rural Development Programmes of the 2007-2013 period - Your Voice Fields marked with * are mandatory. Introduction The Commission will use the information gathered through this survey together
More information«FRAMEWORK OF ACTIONS FOR THE LIFELONG DEVELOPMENT OF COMPETENCIES AND QUALIFICATIONS» Evaluation report
«FRAMEWORK OF ACTIONS FOR THE LIFELONG DEVELOPMENT OF COMPETENCIES AND QUALIFICATIONS» Evaluation report 2006 Foreword In March 2002, the European social partners adopted a framework of actions for the
More informationThe Fourth Community Innovation Survey (CIS IV)
The Fourth Community Innovation Survey (CIS IV) THE HARMONISED SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE The Fourth Community Innovation Survey (Final Version: October 20 2004) This survey collects information about product
More informationGUIDANCE TOOL for the EMAS-based regulation & regulatory relief (Draft Version)
GUIDANCE TOOL for the EMAS-based regulation & regulatory relief (Draft Version) 30 th September 2014 1 INDEX 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 2. BACKGROUND... 5 3. EMAS REGULATION (EC) NO 1221/2009... 9 4. BRAVE PROJECT:
More informationPublic consultation on non-binding guidelines on methodology for reporting non-financial information
Public consultation on non-binding guidelines on methodology for reporting non-financial information Fields marked with are mandatory. Introduction The Directive 2014/95/EU on disclosure of non-financial
More informationInstruments of environmental policy
Instruments of environmental policy Instruments of environmental policies are related to methods, environmental legislation and administrative procedures developed with a view to reduce negative impacts
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Health systems, medical products and innovation Medicines: policy, authorisation and monitoring PHARM 723 PHARMACEUTICAL COMMITTEE 18 October
More informationThe Community Innovation Survey 2010
The Community Innovation Survey 2010 (CIS 2010) THE HARMONISED SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE The Community Innovation Survey 2010 FINAL VERSION July 9, 2010 This survey collects information on your enterprise s
More informationThe European Commission s strategy on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) : achievements, shortcomings and future challenges
The European Commission s strategy on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) 2011-2014: achievements, shortcomings and future challenges Fields marked with * are mandatory. 1 Introduction - Background and
More informationCostas G. Theofylaktos
IENE Workshop: Energy and Geopolitics Roundtable Cogeneration Observatory and Dissemination Europe - CODE2 ROADMAP FOR COGENERATION OF HEAT & POWER FOR BULGARIA Costas G. Theofylaktos BoD of HACHP-Team
More informationEED ARTICLE 8. Best practices in Member States implementation of the Energy Efficiency Directive Article 8 PRELIMINARY RESULTS
EED ARTICLE 8 Best practices in Member States implementation of the Energy Efficiency Directive Article 8 PRELIMINARY RESULTS EU Sustainable Energy Week - Policy Conference - 17 June 2015 Anke BREMS DNV
More informationVacancy Notice. 1. The job (7)
09.11.2015 1(7) Vacancy Notice The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) is launching this call for expressions of interest in order to establish a reserve list for the following temporary agent profile: Reference
More informationREACH. Main concerns resulting from the implementation of REACH. Within the Aerospace Defence and Security business VERSION 1.5
REACH Main concerns resulting from the implementation of REACH Within the Aerospace Defence and Security business VERSION 1.5 This final document - version 1.5 issued on 16 May 2014 Cancels and replaces
More informationFlash Eurobarometer 426. SMEs, Resource Efficiency and Green Markets
SMEs, Resource Efficiency and Green Markets Fieldwork Publication December 2015 Survey requested by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs
More informationRegional study about the identification of regulatory relief/promotional incentives best practices to promote EMAS Region Austria
Regional study about the identification of regulatory relief/promotional incentives best practices to promote Region Austria Document carried out by PP 6: Environment Agency Austria Vienna, 29 th of June
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 6.10.2005 COM(2005)473 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on the appropriateness of establishing rules on
More informationRegional study about the identification of regulatory relief/promotional incentives best practices to promoteemas
Regional study about the identification of regulatory relief/promotional incentives best practices to promoteemas Region [insert here the name of the country/region] Document carried out by PP 3: Scuola
More informationINNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: ITS PERCEPTION IN AND IMPACT ON BUSINESS
Flash Eurobarometer 343 INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: ITS PERCEPTION IN AND IMPACT ON BUSINESS SUMMARY Fieldwork: February-March 2012 Publication: June 2012 This survey has been requested by the European
More informationThe European Commission s strategy on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) : achievements, shortcomings and future challenges
The European Commission s strategy on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) 2011-2014: achievements, shortcomings and future challenges Fields marked with are mandatory. 1 Introduction - Background and
More informationVocational Education and Training (VET) Systems: Role of the Social Partners
Austria Belgium Cyprus Czech Republic Cooperative partnership between associations of employers and of employees has a long tradition in Austria. Social partnership is based on the principle of voluntarism.
More informationESF Ex-Post evaluation
ESF 2007-2013 Ex-Post evaluation Fields marked with * are mandatory. Open public consultation Questionnaire Please consult the background document as it provides useful information on the European Social
More informationEU Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) Article 8
EU Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) Article 8 Insert then choose Picture select your picture. Right click your picture and Send to back. May 2015 Agenda Introduction Overview of EED and European Implementation
More informationVACANCY NOTICE FOR THE POST OF PROJECT OFFICER CONSUMERS. (Ref.: EAHC/CA/IV/2011/001) THE EXECUTIVE AGENCY FOR HEALTH AND CONSUMERS
EXECUTIVE AGENCY FOR HEALTH AND CONSUMERS Administration Unit Human Resources Cell VACANCY NOTICE FOR THE POST OF PROJECT OFFICER CONSUMERS (Ref.: EAHC/CA/IV/2011/001) The Executive Agency for Health and
More informationModernising and simplifying the CAP
Modernising and simplifying the CAP Summary of the results of the public consultation Client: European Commission - DG AGRI Brussels, 7 July 2017 Table of contents 1 Introduction 9 2 Methodology 11 2.1
More informationEMAS KEY BENEFITS FOR ORGANISATIONS AND AUTHORITIES
EMAS KEY BENEFITS FOR ORGANISATIONS AND AUTHORITIES EMAS SCHEME IN SLOVENIA Ljubljana 14 September 2017 Agenda What is EMAS EMAS and ISO 14001 EMAS benefits for organisations and authorities Outlook toward
More informationto ensure that the public is properly informed about the state of the environment.
Contribution ID: 3d857566-b12a-41a3-b91d-7d9a03167ba4 Date: 20/10/2017 16:24:00 Public consultation to support the evaluation of the European Environment Agency (EEA) and its European Environment Information
More informationComposition of the European Parliament
C 227 E/132 Official Journal of the European Union P6_TA(2007)0429 Composition of the European Parliament European Parliament resolution of 11 October 2007 on the composition of Parliament (2007/2169(INI))
More informationPRICE SETTING IN THE ELECTRICITY MARKETS WITHIN THE EU SINGLE MARKET
PRICE SETTING IN THE ELECTRICITY MARKETS WITHIN THE EU SINGLE MARKET A report to the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy of the European Parliament February, 2006 Outline Characteristics of the
More informationRequirements of EED Article 8 and implementation experiences and challenges from different countries
Requirements of EED Article 8 and implementation experiences and challenges from different countries Marco Matteini, Laura Barbier UNIDO Department of Energy Old Tbilisi Hotel, 5-6 June 2018 Tbilisi, Georgia
More informationFuel cells & hydrogen research and innovation in Horizon 2020
Fuel cells & hydrogen research and innovation in Horizon 2020 Hydrogen is one of the few near-zero-emissions energy carriers that could play an important part of the future EU low-carbon energy and transport
More informationDeliverable 3.3 Analysis of actual and potential opportunities to include measures supporting EMAS adoption at national and regional level
Deliverable 3.3 Analysis of actual and potential opportunities to include measures supporting EMAS adoption at national and regional level INDEX SUMMARY DELIVERABLE AIMS METHODOLOGY CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS
More informationCAP CONTEXT INDICATORS
CAP CONTEXT INDICATORS 2014-2020 24. AGRICULTURAL TRAINING OF FARM MANAGERS 2017 update CONTEXT INDICATOR 24: AGRICULTURAL TRAINING OF FARM MANAGERS Learning by doing is still the main form of for the
More informationQuantifying the opportunity European Market Sizing Study for ETSA (June 2014)
Quantifying the opportunity European Market Sizing Study for ETSA (June 2014) NB: Deloitte has not audited data transmitted by ETSA members, and cannot guarantee the accuracy of the data provided 1 1.
More informationPublic consultation on enhanced cooperation between Public Employment Services (PES)
Public consultation on enhanced cooperation between Public Employment Services (PES) Fields marked with * are mandatory. Introduction The European Network of Public Employment Services (PES Network) was
More informationMandatory inspection of sprayers in Europe, chances for the dealers! Jaco Kole SPISE Working Group
Mandatory inspection of sprayers in Europe, chances for the dealers! Jaco Kole SPISE Working Group Contents: What is SPISE Mandatory inspections of sprayers in Europe Current situation in Europe Chances
More informationQualification Procedures for the Construction Industry in Europe: General Overview, 2010
Austria No No ficial (ANKO). Belgium Yes for public a) ; voluntary for private. Bulgaria Yes Private and public bodies, clients. Cyprus Yes, for both public and private works. Not existing. 1. The Treasury
More informationReview of the SME Definition
Contribution ID: 07cbcf0b-3d9b-4b9f-acc4-c2c38bb26e44 Date: 04/05/2018 12:28:03 Review of the SME Definition Fields marked with * are mandatory. Introduction The European Commission is reviewing how micro,
More informationOfficial Journal L 124, 23/05/1996 P
Council Directive 96/26/EC of 29 April 1996 on admission to the occupation of road haulage operator and road passenger transport operator and mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence
More informationThis document is a preview generated by EVS
TECHNICAL REPORT RAPPORT TECHNIQUE TECHNISCHER BERICHT CEN/CLC/ETSI TR 101 552 March 2014 ICS 03.100.10, 13.180, 33.020, 35.020 English version Guidance for the application of conformity assessment to
More informationEnvironmental Awareness Training
Environmental Awareness Training Objective Fulfil training requirements of ISO 14001 Adequate training & knowledge for current & future business activities All Associates within implementation scheme Increased
More informationANALYSING THE SUCCESS DRIVERS OF EMAS IN SELECTED MEMBER STATES
ANALYSING THE SUCCESS DRIVERS OF EMAS IN SELECTED MEMBER STATES KEY LEARNINGS The way EMAS is administered in Germany reflects the country s overall legal and administrative framework. This constellation,
More informationEMAS: European Eco-Management and Audit Scheme and its practical application in EU and Slovak republic
EMAS: European Eco-Management and Audit Scheme and its practical application in EU and Slovak republic Ing. Mariana Dubravská, PhD. Department of Economy and Economic Sciences Faculty of Management University
More informationQUESTIONNAIRE FOR FIRMS. INNOVATION-BASED STRATEGIES FOR GLOBALIZATION Questionnaire for SECTOR NAME (COUNTRY NAME)
VR Questionnaire Insert logo of partner institution here QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FIRMS INNOVATION-BASED STRATEGIES FOR GLOBALIZATION Questionnaire for SECTOR NAME (COUNTRY NAME) Person that makes the interview
More informationTowards EMAS Action Plan
Towards EMAS Action Plan Italy Document carried out by PP 3: Sant Anna School of Advanced Studies Pisa, Italy 1 st version: December 27 th, 2018 Last version: March 8 th, 2019 1 INDEX INTRODUCTION... 3
More informationUKAS Supplement for the Accreditation of Environmental Verifiers for EMAS (the EU Eco Management and Audit Scheme Regulation 1221/2009)
CIS 11 Edition 1 September 2016 UKAS Supplement for the Accreditation of Environmental Verifiers for EMAS (the EU Eco Management and Audit Scheme Regulation 1221/2009) CIS 11 / Edition: 1 Page 1 of 7 Contents
More informationImplementation of the 2014 procurement directives across EU Member States
23568714.1 Implementation of the 2014 procurement directives across EU Member States June 2016 CONTENTS THE 2014 EU PROCUREMENT DIRECTIVES 1 Public Contracts Directive (2014/24/EU) 1 Utilities Contracts
More informationGenesis of the F-Gas Regulation
Genesis of the F-Gas Regulation ECSLA Fall Conference October 16-17,2012 Madrid Genesis of the F-Gas Regulation 2000-2000 First working group on F-gases set up by the Commission NL recommends to adapt
More informationTHE RENEWABLE ENERGY CONTRACTOR MARKET IN EUROPE THE POWER INDEX
THE RENEWABLE ENERGY CONTRACTOR MARKET IN EUROPE THE POWER INDEX There are 1.2 million jobs in renewable energy across the European Union In the European energy market, the shift towards renewables is
More information7324/18 GDLC/LP/JU/ik 1 DGB 1B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 20 March 2018 (OR. en) 7324/18 AGRI 143 OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS From: Presidency On: 19 March 2018 To: Delegations Subject: Communication on "The Future of Food and
More informationPublic consultation on the revision of the.eu regulation
Public consultation on the revision of the.eu regulation Fields marked with * are mandatory. Objective of the public consultation 1 The purpose of this consultation is to collect views on the performance
More informationIncreasing Effectiveness of Publicly Funded Innovation and Competitiveness Programs Based on IMP³rove the European Approach to Better Innovation
Increasing Effectiveness of Publicly Funded Innovation and Competitiveness Programs Based on IMP³rove the European Approach to Better Innovation Management Support Services 2015 1 Introduction 3 2 Overview
More informationRules for Ship Recycling Management System Certification
Rules for Ship Recycling Management System Certification Effective from July 1 st 2009 RINA Società per azioni Via Corsica, 12-16128 Genova - Italy Tel.: +39 01053851 - Fax: +39 0105351000 www.rina.org
More informationATTITUDES OF EUROPEANS TOWARDS AIR QUALITY
Flash Eurobarometer ATTITUDES OF EUROPEANS TOWARDS AIR QUALITY REPORT Fieldwork: September 2012 Publication: January 2013 This survey has been requested by the European Commission, Directorate-General
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union L 153/9
14.6.2007 Official Journal of the European Union L 153/9 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 653/2007 of 13 June 2007 on the use of a common European format for safety certificates and application documents
More informationEnergy Taxation Directive
Contribution ID: 8dd99ce2-bb2e-492b-9612-d1cf4cffdfa3 Date: 04/06/2018 15:29:35 Energy Taxation Directive Fields marked with * are mandatory. Introduction Directive 2003/96/EC has been in force since 2004.
More informationPublic Consultation On the Review of Annexes I and II of the Groundwater Directive
Public Consultation On the Review of Annexes I and II of the Groundwater Directive This document does not represent an official position of the European Commission. It is a tool to explore the views of
More information4th Quality Conference (4QC) Impact Assessment Study. Agenda
4th Quality Conference (4QC) Impact Assessment Study Rui Sousa, PhD Catholic University of Portugal Lisbon, 15 November 2007 Agenda Background to the study Model underlying questionnaire Survey methodology
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 10 November 2016 (OR. en)
Conseil UE Council of the European Union Brussels, 10 November 2016 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2016/0186 (COD) 13660/16 LIMITE NOTE CULT 101 AELE 77 EEE 41 CODEC 1506 From: Permanent Representatives
More informationPN 1880 Consignment of Excisable Products from EU Member States for Commercial Purposes
PN 1880 Consignment of Excisable Products from EU Member States for Commercial Purposes 1. Who Should Read This Leaflet? Persons, other than authorised warehousekeepers, who intend to acquire excisable
More informationELEVENTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE. Montreal, 22 September to 3 October 2003
18/9/03 English, French, Russian and Spanish only * ELEVENTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE Montreal, 22 September to 3 October 2003 Agenda Item 6: Aeronautical navigation issues GNSS LEGAL FRAMEWORK CONTRACTUAL
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Review of greening after one year
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 22.6.2016 SWD(2016) 218 final PART 3/6 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Review of greening after one year EN EN Annex 2 Initial results of the implementation of green direct
More informationResponse to DG Environment s Stakeholder consultation on the political options for the revision of the WEEE directive
June 6 th 2008 Response to DG Environment s Stakeholder consultation on the political options for the revision of the WEEE directive Dear Madam, Dear Sir, The American Chamber of Commerce to the European
More informationENERGY AUDITS (AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS) UNDER THE EED
ENERGY AUDITS (AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS) UNDER THE EED Energy Efficiency Coordination Group Energy Community Vienna, 28 June 2017 Claudia Canevari Deputy Head of Unit European Commission DG ENERGY
More informationCFI SUBMISSION FORM I. CS4 AFUAS: Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace Support Service (AFUAS)
14-110062-I CS4 AFUAS: Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace Support Service (AFUAS) This CFI Submission Form has been produced to enable to evaluate the compliance with the set requirements of the applicants
More informationANNEXES. to the COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 23.7.2014 COM(2014) 520 final ANNEXES 1 to 3 ANNEXES to the COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Energy Efficiency and its contribution
More informationResponse charts for 'Quality Framework for Traineeships'
Response charts for 'Quality Framework for Traineeships' Current search: Query definition All data requested Result pages There are 694 responses matching your criteria of a total of 694 records in the
More informationState of play of energy efficiency investment and financing scheme Czech Republic
State of play of energy efficiency investment and financing scheme Czech Republic Vladimír Sochor Director of Department on Energy Efficiency and Savings Ministry of Industry and Trade Financing Energy
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. accompanying the. Proposal for a
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, SEC(2008) 2121 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT accompanying the Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the voluntary
More informationInformation on the Member States requirement for the nomination of a pharmacovigilane (PhV) contact person at national level
19 July 2017 EMA/INS/PhV/445316/2017 Committees and Inspections Information on the Member s requirement for the nomination of a pharmacovigilane (PhV) contact person at national level Based on Pharmacovigilance
More informationRetail Choice in Electricity: What Have We Learned in 20 Years?
Retail Choice in Electricity: What Have We Learned in 20 Years? Mathew Morey & Laurence Kirsch Christensen Associates Energy Consulting www.caenergy.com March 7, 2016 Presentation Outline Summary Status
More informationPublic consultation addressing the interface between chemical, product and waste legislation
Public consultation addressing the interface between chemical, product and waste legislation The Commission's Communication on the implementation of the circular economy package: options to address the
More informationTargeted stakeholder consultation regarding trends and prospects of jobs and working conditions in transport (For non-enterprises)
Targeted stakeholder consultation regarding trends and prospects of jobs and working conditions in transport (For non-enterprises) Fields marked with are mandatory. 1 Questions to identify the organisation
More informationEnglish Version EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
EUROPEAN STANDARD NORME EUROPÉENNE EUROPÄISCHE NORM EN ISO 16228 February 2018 ICS 21.060.01 English Version Fasteners - Types of inspection documents (ISO 16228:2017) Fixations - Types de documents de
More informationDONOR ASSISTANCE DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT TO CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATION GUIDELINES SERIES ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT
DONOR ASSISTANCE TO CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT IN ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATION GUIDELINES SERIES ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT THE ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND
More informationVACANCY AT THE JOINT SECRETARIAT. Project Finance Manager September 2017
VACANCY AT THE JOINT SECRETARIAT Project Finance Manager September 2017 1. Background The Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE (Interreg CE) Programme is one of the 15 transnational programmes established in the framework
More informationMeta Informations PUBLICATION OF DATA
Response statistics for Public consultation on the initiative "Reforming the internal market for industrial products" from Commission Work Programme 2013 Status : Active Start date : 2013-01-22 End date
More informationRoadmap to 2025 Well-Functioning Retail Energy Markets
Roadmap to 2025 Well-Functioning Retail Energy Markets Ref: C17-SC-59-04-02 9 February 2018 Council of European Energy Regulators asbl Cours Saint-Michel 30a, Box F 1040 Brussels, Belgium Arrondissement
More informationCutting Red Tape The Member State point of view. Presentation by Hilde Van de Velde Bruges March 2010
Cutting Red Tape The Member State point of view Presentation by Hilde Van de Velde Bruges March 2010 The Action Programme created a momentum for reducing administrative burdens and inspired MS to launch
More information(c) The terms of the agreement are set out in the Annex to this Note Verbale.
Note Verbale No EDD/2018/001 Her Britannic Majesty's Foreign and Commonwealth Office presents its compliments to the Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and has the
More informationEuropean Establishment Survey on Working Time and Work-Life Balance
European Establishment Survey on Working Time and Work-Life Balance Kasia Jurczak Research Officer 21 st June 2007, Bucharest 10/07/2007 1 General Information Survey of working time arrangements and work-life
More informationIMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE 33 and ARTICLE 41 OF DIRECTIVE 2009/73/EC regarding Gas Storage
IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE 33 and ARTICLE 41 OF DIRECTIVE 2009/73/EC regarding Gas Storage CEER Monitoring Report 09 July 2012 Council of European Energy Regulators ASBL 28 rue le Titien, 1000 Bruxelles
More informationISO Introduction
ISO14000 - Introduction After the success of the ISO9000 series of quality standards, the International Standards Organization published a comprehensive set of standards for environmental management. This
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 9.11.2004 COM(2004) 745 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ON INCENTIVES FOR EMAS REGISTERED ORGANISATIONS {SEC(2004)1375}
More informationRe-Assessing the Barriers to Accessing and Using Spatial Data for EIA and SEA Studies
Environmental monitoring in Europe: SEIS-BASIS 1 Joint Research Centre (JRC) Re-Assessing the Barriers to Accessing and Using Spatial Data for EIA and SEA Studies Lara Pavanello and Robin S. Smith SDI
More informationD2.6 EU Summary Report documenting the collected information on recommendations for EPC markets
D2.6 EU Summary Report documenting the collected EU-wide Transparense project This document has been conducted within the framework of project Transparense Increasing Transparency of Energy Service Markets
More informationPublic consultation on non binding guidelines on methodology for reporting non financial information
Case Id: 1d5a329e 0c80 419e 86a0 67c62d86aa1b Date: 15/04/2016 09:21:19 Public consultation on non binding guidelines on methodology for reporting non financial information Fields marked with are mandatory.
More informationEU Policy on Waste-to-Energy
EU Policy on Waste-to-Energy an overview ISWA Beacon Conference 25-26 October 2007, Malmö, Sweden Dr. Ella Stengler CEWEP - Managing Director Waste-to-Energy in Europe in 2005 Waste-to-Energy Plants in
More informationPublic consultation addressing the interface between chemical, product and waste legislation
Public consultation addressing the interface between chemical, product and waste legislation The Commission's Communication on the implementation of the circular economy package: options to address the
More informationSimplified administration and management of the organic farming legislation
Chapter 11 Simplified administration and management of the organic farming legislation 11.1 Introduction Evaluation Question 6 To what extent has the current legislative framework for organic farming contributed
More informationFixing Directors' Remuneration in Europe. Governance, Regulation and Disclosure
Fixing Directors' Remuneration in Europe Governance, Regulation and Disclosure Prof. Guido Ferrarini Dr. Maria Cristina Ungureanu University of Genoa Roundtable on Directors Remuneration European Commission,
More informationRelating to the transnational hiring-out of workers in the framework of the provision of services
FORM FOR USE (OPTIONAL) BY THE REQUESTING ADMINISTRATION I. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Relating to the transnational hiring-out of workers in the framework of the provision of services Pursuant to Article
More informationConsultation on the Review of Directive 2012/27/EU on Energy Efficiency
Case Id: 6bb20ac8-9018-4974-8993-f60df3af751c Date: 27/01/2016 12:23:44 Consultation on the Review of Directive 2012/27/EU on Energy Efficiency Fields marked with * are mandatory. Introduction This consultation
More information12. Waste and material flows
1 Environmental signals 22 12. Waste and material flows policy issue indicator assessment decoupling resource use from economic activity decoupling waste generation from economic activity reducing generation
More informationEnergy Efficiency Perspectives and Priorities Vleva EUSEW, 24 June 2014
Efficiency Perspectives and Priorities Vleva EUSEW, 24 June 2014 Eva Hoos European Commission Directorate-General for Efficiency Unit 1. Implementation 2. Financing 3. Next steps: 2030 Outline 1. Implementation
More informationThe Energy Efficiency Watch Survey
The Energy Efficiency Watch Survey Christiane Egger OÖ Energiesparverband christiane.egger@esv.or.at, www.esv-en.at www.energy-efficiency-watch.org The Energy Efficiency Watch 2 Project: Reality check
More informationCorporate Responsibility Practices Survey 2013
www.pwc.com/mt Corporate Responsibility Practices Survey 2013 A survey about sustainability practices of companies in Malta carried out in Q1 2013. June 2013 The PwC Corporate Resposibility Practices Survey
More informationAttitudes of Europeans towards resource efficiency. Analytical report
Flash Eurobarometer 316 The Gallup Organization Flash Eurobarometer European Commission Attitudes of Europeans towards resource efficiency Analytical report Fieldwork: January 2011 Publication: March 2011
More informationECC-Net statistics 1 regarding e-commerce
ECC-Net statistics 1 regarding e-commerce 2012-2013 The European Consumer Centre Network The European Consumer Centre Network (ECC-Net) consists of 30 centres based in each EU Member State, Norway and
More information