COMPLIANCE WITH EU ANNEX 15: VALIDATION AND QUALIFICATION
|
|
- Myra Cobb
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 COMPLIANCE WITH EU ANNEX 15: VALIDATION AND QUALIFICATION Paul L. Pluta, PhD Journal of Validation Technology Journal of GXP Compliance University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL USA
2 OBJECTIVES Review EU Annex 15 Validation and Qualification Consistency with other major guidances Identify common themes Discuss potential approaches Discuss compliance issues.
3 EU ANNEX 15 QUALIFICATION AND VALIDATION Principles and general Organizing and planning Documentation including VMP Equipment, utilities, facilities, and systems Stages of qualification and requalification Process validation Transportation Packaging and utilities Test methods Cleaning validation Change control
4 PRINCIPLES AND GENERAL Principle: Qualification and validation applicable to manufacture of medicinal products and active substances. GMP requirement Change management Consistency with ICH Q8, Q9, Q10, Q11 General: Quality risk management approach throughout lifecycle Documented justification
5 ORGANIZING AND PLANNING All qualification and validation should consider life cycle of facilities, equipment, utilities, process, and product Trained personnel Quality system and quality oversight VMP documentation Policy Organizational structure / roles / responsibilities Facilities, equipment, etc. Change control Qualification / validation strategy Quality risk management approach Data integrity
6 DOCUMENTATION INCLUDING VMP Good documentation practices Approved documents Validation protocols: critical systems, attributes, parameters, acceptance criteria Justified and documented changes to protocols during execution Results, reviews, conclusions Formal release to next stage of qualification and validation
7 EQUIPMENT, UTILITIES, FACILITIES, SYSTEMS, AND PACKAGING STAGES OF QUALIFICATION Stage identification: URS DQ FAT / SAT IQ OQ PQ
8 REQUALIFICATION Evaluate equipment, facilities, utilities, and systems at appropriate frequency Confirm state of control Justified time period Assess small changes over time.
9 PROCESS VALIDATION Thirty-two statements (plus sub-statements) ; 4+ pages General Concurrent validation Traditional process validation Continuous process verification Hybrid approach Ongoing process verification during lifecycle
10 GENERAL Applicable to all pharmaceutical dosage forms Robust product development process Traditional or continuous verification Retrospective validation not acceptable Bracketing acceptable multiple products Critical and non-critical parameters and attributes Underlying process knowledge.
11 CONCURRENT VALIDATION Strong benefit-risk ration for patient Documented and available to Qualified Person for certification.
12 TRADITIONAL PROCESS VALIDATION Number of batches based on quality risk management principles Three batches usual CPP, CQA, and acceptance criteria. Process validation protocol requirements.
13 CONTINUOUS PROCESS VERIFICATION QbD development Science-based control strategy PAT and multivariate SPC tools
14 HYBRID APPROACH Combination traditional and continuous process verification approaches.
15 ONGOING PROCESS VERIFICATION DURING LIFECYCLE State of control maintained throughout product lifecycle. Ongoing process verification. Document in product quality review.
16 VERIFICATION OF TRANSPORTATION Consistent with marketing authorization Defined routes Seasonal variation Risk assessment Variables Delays Failure of monitoring devices, others Continuous monitoring if necessary
17 VALIDATION OF PACKAGING Variation in equipment processing during primary packaging Primary and secondary packaging equipment should be qualified Qualification at minimum and maximum operating ranges for critical parameters.
18 QUALIFICATION OF UTILITIES Quality of steam, air, water, gases, etc. Seasonal variation Risk assessment.
19 Validated test methods TEST METHODS No product influence on microorganisms No influence of sanitizing agents on clean room surfaces.
20 CLEANING VALIDATION Fifteen individual statements Sources of variation should be identified Toxicological evaluation of residues Microbial considerations Recovery studies
21 DEFINITION Cleaning validation should be performed in order to confirm the effectiveness of any cleaning procedure for all product contact equipment. Simulating agents may be used with appropriate scientific justification. Where similar types of equipment are grouped together, a justification of the specific equipment selected for cleaning validation is expected. Simulation OK with justification Equivalent equipment OK with justification
22 VISUAL CLEANLINESS A visual check for cleanliness is an important part of the acceptance criteria for cleaning validation. It is not generally acceptable for this criterion alone to be used. Repeated cleaning and retesting until acceptable residue results are obtained is not considered an acceptable approach. Visual cleanliness alone is not acceptable No test until clean.
23 INCOMPLETE CLEANING VALIDATION It is recognised that a cleaning validation programme may take some time to complete and validation with verification after each batch may be required for some products, e.g., investigational medicinal products. There should be sufficient data from the verification to support a conclusion that the equipment is clean and available for further use. If cleaning validation not complete, must have sufficient data to use equipment.
24 AUTOMATED CLEANING EQUIPMENT Validation should consider the level of automation in the cleaning process. Where an automatic process is used, the specified normal operating range of the utilities and equipment should be validated. Automated equipment must be validated.
25 CLEANING VALIDATION VARIABLES For all cleaning processes an assessment should be performed to determine the variable factors which influence cleaning effectiveness and performance, e.g., operators, the level of detail in procedures such as rinsing times, etc. If variable factors have been identified, the worst case situations should be used as the basis for cleaning validation studies. Validate worst case variables.
26 RESIDUE CARRYOVER Limits for the carryover of product residues should be based on a toxicological evaluation. The justification for the selected limits should be documented in a risk assessment which includes all the supporting references. Limits should be established for the removal of any cleaning agents used. Acceptance criteria should consider the potential cumulative effect of multiple items of equipment in the process equipment train. Therapeutic macromolecules and peptides are known to degrade and denature when exposed to ph extremes and/or heat, and my become pharmacologically inactive. A toxicological evaluation may therefore not be applicable in these circumstances. If it is not feasible to test for specific residues, other representative parameters may be selected, e.g., total organic carbon (TOC) and conductivity). Toxicologic evaluation of residues required.
27 CLEANING VALIDATION MICROBIAL The risk presented by microbial and endotoxin contamination should be considered during the development of cleaning validation protocols. Consider microbial contamination as part of cleaning if necessary.
28 DIRTY AND CLEAN HOLD TIMES The influence of the time between manufacture and cleaning and the time between cleaning and use should be taken in account to define dirty and clean hold times for the cleaning process. Define dirty and clean hold times.
29 CAMPAIGNS Where campaign manufacture is carried out, the impact on the ease of cleaning at the end of a campaign should be considered and be maximum length of a campaign (in time and/or number of batches) should be the basis for cleaning validation exercises. Campaigns should consider worst case conditions.
30 CLEANING WORST-CASE MATRIX Where a worst case product approach is used as a cleaning validation model, a scientific rationale should be provided for the selection of the worst case product and the impact of new products to the site assessed. Criteria for determining the worst case may include solubility, cleanability, toxicity, and potency. Provide justification when using worst-case matrix.
31 SAMPLING LOCATIONS Cleaning validation protocols should specify or reference the locations to be sampled, the rationale for the selection of these locations and define the acceptance criteria. Sampling locations must be defined and justified.
32 SAMPLING AND RECOVERY Sampling should be carried out by swabbing and/or rinsing or by other means depending on the production equipment. The sampling materials and method should not influence the result. Recovery should be shown to be possible from all product contact materials sampled in the equipment with all the sampling methods used. Swab and rinse sampling OK. Recovery studies for all equipment materials.
33 REPEATABILITY The cleaning procedure should be performed an appropriate number of times based on risk assessment and meet the acceptance criteria in order to prove that the cleaning method is validated. Number of lots required based on risk assessment.
34 DEDICATED EQUIPMENT Where a cleaning process is ineffective or is not appropriate for some equipment, dedicated equipment of other appropriate measures should be used for each product as indicated in chapters 3 and 5 of EudraLex, Volume 4, Part I. Dedicated equipment considerations.
35 MANUAL CLEANING Where manual cleaning of equipment is performed, it is especially important that the effectiveness of the manual process should be confirmed at a justified frequency. Must revalidate manual cleaning processes at justified frequency.
36 CHANGE CONTROL Handle within Quality System Change marketing authorization if needed Quality Risk Management Post-change effectiveness
37 LIFECYCLE APPROACH TO PROCESS VALIDATION FDA, 2011 Definition: Collection and evaluation of data, from the process design stage throughout commercial production, which establishes scientific evidence that a process is capable of consistently delivering quality products. Process validation involves a series of activities over the lifecycle of the product and process. Three stages of activities: Stage 1 Process Design Development and scale-up activities Stage 2 Process Qualification Reproducible manufacturing Stage 3 Continued Process Verification Routine manufacturing STAGE 1 AND STAGE 3 EMPHASIS NEW PARADIGM ABOVE CONCEPTS APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCESSES, EFU, ETC. 37
38 STAGE 1: QUALITY BY DESIGN (QbD) Quality target product profile (QTTP) Critical quality attributes (CQA) Critical material attributes (CMA) Critical process parameters (CPP) Design space Scale-up and technology transfer Identify input variables Input variable control strategy Continuous improvement Other considerations: PAT, risk analysis DEVELOPMENT PROCESS DEFINED GLOBAL GUIDANCES 38
39 STAGE 2: DEMONSTRATION Process Performance Qualification (PPQ) Confirm the process design and development work Demonstrate that the commercial manufacturing process performs as expected. Based on sound science and experience. Higher level of testing and sampling. Process is reproducible and will consistently deliver quality products. 39
40 STAGE 3: MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE Assuming good development of the process, identification of potential variation, and control of same, the manufacturer must maintain the process under control over the product lifetime. Control must accommodate expected changes in materials, equipment, personnel, and other changes throughout the commercial life of the product based on risk analysis. 40
41 VALIDATION PHILOSOPHY Validation is confirmation. Acceptable (passing) results are expected. Validation is not R&D Final stage of development process Optimization Fine-tuning Debugging 41
42 VALIDATION HISTORY AND EVOLUTION 1978 GMP includes Validation Development VALIDATION Control Lifecycle approach UNDERSTANDING PQ MONITORING 42
43 APPLICATION AREAS LIFECYCLE APPROACH APPLICATION Processes: Manufacturing, cleaning, analytical, all processes Equipment processes: HVAC, water Equipment, facilities utilities, computers, Quality systems APROACH Design and understanding Demonstrate Monitor and maintain USE SAME APPROACH FOR ALL VALIDATION / QUALIFICATION 43
44 ICH GUIDANCES Q8: Pharmaceutical Development QbD Q9: Quality Risk management Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality System Q11: Development and Management of Drug Substances
45 SUMMARY EU ANNEX 15 VALIDATION AND QUALIFICATION Common themes of major guidances Development and understanding Lifecycle approach applications Quality risk management Maintain state of control -- post validation and post changes EU: Cleaning validation emphasis
46 PAUL L. PLUTA, PhD Editor-in-Chief Journal of Validation Technology Journal of GXP Compliance IVT / UBM Life Sciences / Advanstar Communications Associate Professor of Biopharmaceutics University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) College of Pharmacy Chicago, IL, USA Pharmaceutical industry experience: 30+ years Contact: ppluta@uic.edu
Annex Draft Annex
Anmerkung 1: Dieses Vergleichsdokument wurde nach bestem Wissen und Gewissen erstellt und ist rechtlich nicht bindend. Es gelten die von der EMA veröffentlichten Dokumente in der jeweiligen Form. Anmerkung
More informationISPE S GUIDES AND HOW THEY APPLY TO CLEANING AND CLEANING VALIDATION
ISPE S GUIDES AND HOW THEY APPLY TO CLEANING AND CLEANING VALIDATION Stephanie A. Wilkins, PE ISPE NORDIC CLEANING VALIDATION CONFERENCE 20 April 2016 Objectives > ISPE s Risk-MaPP Guide and its impact
More informationPMDA Perspective: Regulatory Updates on Process Validation Standard
CMC Strategy Forum Japan 2014 Tokyo, Japan, December 8-9, 2014 PMDA Perspective: Regulatory Updates on Validation Standard Kazunobu Oyama, PhD Office of Cellular and Tissue-based Products PMDA, Japan Disclaimer:
More informationThe long anticipated draft of the FDA s
This article provides an overview of the draft guidance, the key changes in relation to the 1987 guidance, and reviews its potential impact on the current industry approaches to science- and risk-based
More informationGuidelines for Process Validation of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms
Guidelines for Process Validation of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms Version 2.1 Date issued 21/02/2010 Date of implementation 21/05/2010 31 August 2010 Page 1 of 20 Guidelines for Process Validation of Pharmaceutical
More informationCleaning Validation in a Biologics Facility Case Study. CBE Pty Ltd
Cleaning Validation in a Biologics Facility Case Study CBE Pty Ltd This training program is copyright to CBE Pty Ltd and may not be modified, reproduced, sold, loaned, hired or traded in any form without
More informationCurrent Features of USFDA and EMA Process Validation Guidance
Human Journals Review Article April 2016 Vol.:6, Issue:1 All rights are reserved by Patwekar S.L et al. Current Features of USFDA and EMA Process Validation Guidance Keywords: Pharmaceutical validation,
More informationPROPOSAL FOR REVISION OF THE SUPPLEMENTARY GUIDELINES ON GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES: VALIDATION, APPENDIX 7:NON-STERILE PROCESS VALIDATION
1 Working document QAS/13.527/Rev.2 August 2014 RESTRICTED 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 PROPOSAL FOR REVISION OF THE SUPPLEMENTARY GUIDELINES ON GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES: VALIDATION, APPENDIX 7:NON-STERILE PROCESS
More informationINTERNATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACY ISSN Review Article
INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACY www.irjponline.com ISSN 2230 8407 Review Article INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PHARMACEUTICAL PROCESS VALIDATION: A REVIEW Pandita Rachna* 1, Rana A C
More informationTHE NEW QUALITY PARADIGM OPPORTUNITIES AND EXPECTATIONS IN ICH Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 DR. FRITZ ERNI
THE NEW QUALITY PARADIGM IN ICH Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 OPPORTUNITIES AND EXPECTATIONS DR. FRITZ ERNI FRITZ@ERNI.NET THE NEW PARADIGM OR QUALITY BY DESIGN Why do we need it! Some background Information The impact
More informationQbD and the New Process Validation Guidance
Page 1 of 6 Published on Pharmaceutical Processing (http://www.pharmpro.com) Home > QbD and the New Process Validation Guidance QbD and the New Process Validation Guidance Bikash Chatterjee and Wai Wong,
More informationOverview of Amgen s CQP Commissioning and Qualification Program Steve Wisniewski Principal Compliance Consultant, CAI Past Chairman ISPE C&Q COP
May 1-3, 2012 Javits Center New York, NY Introduction to ISPE GUIDE: SCIENCE AND RISK-BASED APPROACH FOR THE DELIVERY OF FACILITIES, SYSTEMS, AND EQUIPMENT & Overview of Amgen s CQP Commissioning and Qualification
More informationQbD Concepts Applied to Qualification and Transfer of Analytical Methods
QbD Concepts Applied to Qualification and Transfer of Analytical Methods CMC Strategy Forum Latin America - 2014 Patrick Swann Senior Director Technical Development QbD = Quality by Design QbD - A systematic
More informationThe Cleaning Validation Process
The Cleaning Validation Process The Scope of Cleaning Validation The Cleaning Validation Sequence Prerequisites Cleaning Validation Strategy, Plan, and Policy Sampling Recovery Studies Analytical Method
More informationA COMPARATIVE FRAMEWORK BETWEEN NEW PRODUCT & LEGACY PRODUCT PROCESS VALIDATION
A COMPARATIVE FRAMEWORK BETWEEN NEW PRODUCT & LEGACY PRODUCT PROCESS VALIDATION By Mark Mitchell, Principal Consultant, Process and Engineering, Pharmatech Associates, Inc. PHARMATECH WHITE PAPER.DOCX
More informationApplication of Quality by Design (QbD) in product development. James E. Polli September 16, 2015
Application of Quality by Design (QbD) in product development James E. Polli jpolli@rx.umaryland.edu September 16, 2015 Pharmaceutical Equivalence Same active ingredient(s) Same dosage form Same route
More informationCLEANING VALIDATION PROBLEMS GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE
CLEANING VALIDATION PROBLEMS GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE Paul L. Pluta, PhD Journal of Validation Technology and Journal of GXP Compliance University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) College of Pharmacy Chicago, IL,
More informationISPE Baseline Pharmaceutical Engineering Guide for New and Renovated Facilities Volume 2: Oral Solid Dosage Forms (Revision) Executive Summary
Reprinted from PHARMACEUTICAL ENGINEERING The Official Magazine of ISPE September/October 2008, Vol. 28 No. 5 This executive summary provides an overview of the second edition of the ISPE Baseline Guide:
More informationProcess Validation Guidelines. by Pramote Cholayudth Thai Industrial Pharmacist Association (TIPA)
Process Validation Guidelines by Pramote Cholayudth cpramote2000@yahoo.com Thai Industrial Pharmacist Association (TIPA) September 19, 2016 1 2 Process Validation References Hierarchy Law Regulatory Guidelines
More informationPrincipal approach to CPV :
Principal approach to CPV : Integration with Quality Systems & Operating Mechanisms J. Gampfer, Baxalta, Vienna Austria Baxalta Principal Approach to CPV J. Gampfer Page 1 Baxalta Principal Approach to
More informationBEAM ASPECTS OF COMPOUNDING PRODUCT DESIGN. Reinout C.A. Schellekens, PharmD, RHPh, QP. Head Clinical Drug Production and Development
- ASPECTS OF COMPOUNDING PRODUCT DESIGN Reinout C.A. Schellekens, PharmD, RHPh, QP Head Clinical Drug Production and Development Department of Hospital and Clinical Pharmacy University Medical Center Groningen,
More informationQbD (Quality by Design) Has industry benefited from this? WHITE PAPER.
WHITE PAPER www.makrocare.com/consulting There are many facets to engineering for a healthier world. It is important to understand what surrounds us today and look into what we believe will surround us
More informationImpacto de las Nuevas Tendencias Regulatorias en la Producción de Parenterales. Innovacion en Packaging Primario
Impacto de las Nuevas Tendencias Regulatorias en la Producción de Parenterales Innovacion en Packaging Primario 1 Contents Company Highlight What s Changing in Pharma Pharma Trends Harmonisation New Requirements
More informationMicrobiological Cleaning Method Validation
Microbiological Cleaning Method Validation The purpose of cleaning procedures should never be to reduce bioburden to an acceptable level! Fergus O Connell QA Manager Eurofins ams Laboratories www.eurofins.com
More informationCleaning Procedures. These guidelines are intended for Bulk Pharmaceutical Chemicals but almost every word applies to Drug Products
CLEANING DEVELOPMENT Cleaning Procedures as the FDA See It These guidelines are intended for Bulk Pharmaceutical Chemicals but almost every word applies to Drug Products BPC CLEANING (& Drug Products)
More informationGMP MANUAL Contents. Contents (1) 1 Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS) 2 Personnel
GMP MANUAL GMP MANUAL 1 Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS) 1.A Preface 1.B The road to a Pharmaceutical Quality System 1.C Introduction to the PQS 1.C.1 General requirements 1.C (1) 1.C.2 Documentation
More informationGuidance for Industry Process Validation: General Principles and Practices. F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd.
Guidance for Industry Process Validation: General Principles and Practices D M k T k Dr. Mark Tucker, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd. Disclosures I am currently a Senior Technical Advisor at F. Hoffman -La Roche.
More informationWHO guidelines on quality risk management
Annex 2 WHO guidelines on quality risk management 1. Introduction 62 1.1 Background and scope 62 1.2 Principles of quality risk management 64 2. Glossary 67 3. Quality risk management process 70 3.1 Initiating
More informationgmp revıew analysing international pharmaceutical regulations Annex 15: Qualification and Validation a significant new guidance
gmp revıew analysing international pharmaceutical regulations Annex 15: Qualification and Validation a significant new guidance FDA issues revised guidance for analytical method validation Auditing artwork
More informationQuality Implementation Working Group on Q8, Q9 and Q10 Questions & Answers
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE Quality Implementation Working Group on Q8, Q9 and Q10 & Current version dated June
More information22 January Division of Dockets Management (HFA 305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, rm Rockville, MD 20852
22 January 2009 Division of Dockets Management (HFA 305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 SUBMISSION OF COMMENTS, DOCKET NO. FDA-2008-D-0559 Dear Sir or Madam:
More informationPERFORMANCE QUALIFICATION PROTOCOL HVAC SYSTEM
Page 1 of 24 PERFORMANCE QUALIFICATION PROTOCOL FOR HVAC SYSTEM Signing of this Performance Qualification Protocol indicates agreement with the Validation Master Plan approach of the equipment. Further
More informationA holistic regulatory approach to accelerated CMC development
A holistic regulatory approach to accelerated CMC development Seán Barry Ph.D Pharmaceutical Assessor Health Products Regulatory Authority CMC Strategy Forum 2017 Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are
More informationCleaning Validation Summit 2016
May 23-24, 2016, Racquet Club of Philadelphia, PA Featured Speakers Include: Dushyant Varshney Dir. Manufacturing Assessment, Hospira Mariann Neverovitch Research Scientist at Bristol-Myers Squibb Michele
More informationSeamless Integration of ASTM E2500, Annex 15, FDA Process Validation Guideline and Chinese GMP in Large CapEx Project in China Daniel Nilsson
Seamless Integration of ASTM E2500, Annex 15, FDA Process Validation Guideline and Chinese GMP in Large CapEx Project in China Daniel Nilsson Senior Management Consultant Agenda Introduction A state-of
More informationICH guideline Q12 on technical and regulatory considerations for pharmaceutical product lifecycle management
1 2 3 14 December 2017 EMA/CHMP/ICH/804273/2017 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use 4 5 6 7 ICH guideline Q12 on technical and regulatory considerations for pharmaceutical product lifecycle
More informationTECHNICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT Q12
INTERNATIONAL CONCIL FOR HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE ICH HARMONISED GUIDELINE TECHNICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT LIFECYCLE
More informationFuture of Pharmaceutical Quality and the Path to Get There
Future of Pharmaceutical Quality and the Path to Get There Lawrence Yu, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research 3rd PQRI/FDA Conference on Advancing
More informationEquipment Qualification Ensure Fit for Intended Use. IVT Amsterdam Conference Mary Sexton. 19 Mar 2015
Equipment Qualification Ensure Fit for Intended Use IVT Amsterdam Conference Mary Sexton 19 Mar 2015 Equipment Qualification Ensure Fit for Intended Use 1. Types of Qualification 2. Validating Equipment
More informationEvolution of the CMC Review - ANDAs
Evolution of the CMC Review - ANDAs Susan Rosencrance, Ph.D. Director (Acting), Office of Lifecycle Drug Products Office of Pharmaceutical Quality FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research October 6,
More informationQUALIFICATION and VALIDATION Open Discussion Workshop QP Forum 21 st April 2016
QUALIFICATION and VALIDATION Open Discussion Workshop QP Forum 21 st April 2016 Representatives from cross section of companies were at this workshop namely: Abbott, Stiefel, Abbvie, Pfizer, Helsinn, BMS,
More informationProcess Validation Lifecycle Approach: A Return to Science
Process Validation Lifecycle Approach: A Return to Science Hal Baseman, ValSource LLC, PDA Chairman PDA & ISPE Joint New England Chapter Process Validation Event Sep 16, 2015 Woburn, MA Program Summary
More informationPAT & Risk-Based Initiatives: Implementation Issues PDA New England - 8 th Dec Cliff Campbell B.E., C.Eng. CC&A Ltd., Cork, Ireland
PAT & Risk-Based Initiatives: Implementation Issues PDA New England - 8 th Dec 2004 Cliff Campbell B.E., C.Eng. CC&A Ltd., Cork, Ireland cca@iol.ie 1 FDA Context 1) FDA 5-Part Strategic Plan Protect &
More informationEuropean Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical ISSN Sciences
ejbps, 2015, Volume 2, Issue 4,172-194. Review Article SJIF Impact Factor 2.062 Himanshu et al. European Journal of Biomedical AND Pharmaceutical sciences http://www.ejbps.com European Journal of Biomedical
More informationDemonstrating a High Degree of Assurance in Stage 2 of the Process Validation Lifecycle
Process Performance Qualification Demonstrating a High Degree of Assurance in Stage 2 of the Process Validation Lifecycle Wendy Zwolenski Lambert, CQM/OE, RAC CMC Strategy Forum January 28, 2013 aligns
More informationIdentifying and Controlling CPPs and CMAs
March 2018, BioPharm International Publication Identifying and Controlling CPPs and CMAs Thomas A. Little Ph.D. 2/22/2018 President/CEO Thomas A. Little Consulting, BioAssay Sciences 12401 N Wildflower
More informationINDUSTRIAL PROCESS VALIDATION OF TABLET DOSAGE FORM: A REVIEW
International Journal of Pharmacy Review & Research www.ijprr.com INDUSTRIAL PROCESS VALIDATION OF TABLET DOSAGE FORM: A REVIEW Vishal Sharma* and Nimrata Seth 1 Department of Pharmaceutics, Rayat Institute
More informationParadigm Shift in Comparability Assessment:
Paradigm Shift in Comparability Assessment: How Quality by Design (QbD) and Process Analytical Technology (PAT) can improve Structure-Activity Relationship (SAR) evaluation and its relevance to comparability
More informationRegional GMP Strengthening Workshop for Indian Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and State Regulators
Regional GMP Strengthening Workshop for Indian Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and State Regulators Focused on GMP in production of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients and Oral Solid Dosage Forms Organized
More informationIMPURITIES IN NEW DRUG PRODUCTS
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE ICH HARMONISED TRIPARTITE GUIDELINE IMPURITIES IN NEW DRUG PRODUCTS Recommended for
More informationPreparing Your Aseptic Processing Facility for an FDA Inspection. Valerie Welter, Director Quality Bayer HealthCare March 10, 2014
Preparing Your Aseptic Processing Facility for an FDA Inspection Valerie Welter, Director Quality Bayer HealthCare March 10, 2014 Agenda Regulatory Requirements Establishing your Approach Aseptic Controls
More informationHealth Products and Food Branch Inspectorate
OUR MANDATE: To promote good nutrition and informed use of drugs, food, medical devices and natural health products, and to maximize the safety and efficacy of drugs, food, natural health products, medical
More informationICH Q8/Q8(R)
Pharmaceutical Quality for the 21 st Century Temple University May 06, 2008 Joseph Famulare, Deputy Director FDA CDER Office of Compliance CDER Office of Compliance and the Critical Path Initiative Since
More informationCLEANING VALIDATION WITH RISK ASSESSMENT
CLEANING VALIDATION WITH RISK ASSESSMENT Bangkok, Thailand July 26 2017 Jairaj (Jai) Mehta, Consultant, Promoting the Quality of Medicines 2016. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Presentation Outline: Cleaning Validation
More informationAseptic Process Validation
Aseptic Process Validation IMB GMP Information Seminar 27 th September 2012 Gerard Sheridan, Inspector Date Insert on Master Slide Slide 1 Overview Guidance Best Practices Common Deficiencies Slide 2 Aseptic
More informationRisk-based Approach to Part 11 and GxP Compliance
Welcome to our E-Seminar: Risk-based Approach to Part 11 and GxP Compliance 1 Intro Common Discussion Q: Do I really need to do this? Possible Answers A: Of course! (QA) B: Who cares, I have work to do!
More informationConducting Supplier Audits: Ensure Validation Compliance
Conducting Supplier Audits: Ensure Validation Compliance Presented by: Gamal Amer, Ph. D. Principal Premier Compliance Services, Inc. All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission. 1 Outline Why
More informationHow to Identify Critical Quality Attributes and Critical Process Parameters
How to Identify Critical Quality Attributes and Critical Process Parameters Jennifer Maguire, Ph.D. Daniel Peng, Ph.D. Office of Process and Facility (OPF) OPQ/CDER/FDA FDA/PQRI 2 nd Conference North Bethesda,
More informationRegulatory expectations on impurities in drug substances - Pavia, October 2, Luisa Torchio Euticals SpA
Regulatory expectations on impurities in drug substances - Pavia, October 2, 2015 Luisa Torchio Euticals SpA An Impurity is defined as any substance or element present in a drug substance (DS) that is
More informationThe validation of biological Active Pharmaceutical
This article presents a procedure for the validation of biological API manufacturing processes. It details each step of the procedure for biological processes applications, and covers the regulatory requirements
More informationA Review article on Pharmaceutical Validation and Process Controls
ISSN: 2277-7695 CODEN Code: PIHNBQ ZDB-Number: 2663038-2 IC Journal No: 7725 Vol. 1 No. 7 2012 Online Available at www.thepharmajournal.com THE PHARMA INNOVATION A Review article on Pharmaceutical Validation
More informationRegulatory perspectives on CQAs, CPPs, and Risk Analyses for Combination Products.
Regulatory perspectives on CQAs, CPPs, and Risk Analyses for Combination Products. 3rd FDA/PQRI Conference on Advancing Product Quality March 22-24, 2017 TRACK #2 Achieving Drug Product Quality: Novel
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. EudraLex The Rules Governing Medicinal Products in the European Union
EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Consumer goods Pharmaceuticals Brussels, 25 October 2005 EudraLex The Rules Governing Medicinal Products in the European Union Volume 4 EU
More informationHeating, ventilation, and air system encompasses heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, which is integral component of
REVIEW ARTICLE Demand of pharmaceutical facility functionality: Validation and qualification of HVAC system Anamika Singh, Sapna Malviya, Anil Kharia Department of Quality Assurance of Modern Institute
More informationEfficient Validation Strategies and VMPs
FDA Medical Device Industry Coalition Efficient Validation Strategies and VMPs Anne Holland Wilson Agenda History and Recent Trends Why Validate 21 CFR 820.75 Process Validation Standards and Guidance
More informationApplication of Quality by Design in formulation and process Development
21 st EAFP Annual Conference, Quality Assurance in Pharmacy Education, May 14-16, 2015 Application of Quality by Design in formulation and process Development Stavros N. Politis, Pharmacist, MSc, PhD Laboratory
More informationQuality Systems. Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance. Advanced GMP Workshops 2017
Quality Systems Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance Advanced GMP Workshops 2017 Presented by Patrick Costello on November 2017 Principal Scientific Administrator Manufacturing & Quality Compliance An agency
More informationISO Part 1 and Part 2 Compliance Requirements. Cathriona O Neill
ISO 11607 Part 1 and Part 2 Compliance Requirements Cathriona O Neill I.S. EN 11607 Introduction ISO 11607 is the principal guidance document. Packaging for terminally sterilised medical devices - Part
More informationEnvironmental Monitoring of Aseptic Processing Areas - 1
Environmental Monitoring of Aseptic Processing Areas - 1 A war against an invisible enemy DCVMN - Víctor Maqueda - May 30, 31, June 1 2016 1 Training Course Agenda Overview of Environmental Monitoring
More informationAppropriate Control Strategies Eliminate the Need for Redundant Testing of Pharmaceutical Products
Date: April 23, 2012 Appropriate Control Strategies Eliminate the Need for Redundant Testing of Pharmaceutical Products Key Messages Importation quality control testing for pharmaceutical, biological/biotechnology
More informationCUSTOMER AND SUPPLIER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR 21 CFR 11 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT. 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ. (Frequently Asked Questions)
21 CFR Part 11 FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) Customer and Supplier Roles and Responsibilities for Assessment of METTLER TOLEDO STARe Software Version 16.00, including: - 21 CFR 11 Compliance software
More informationHot Topics in Drug Product Process Validation: A Reviewer s Perspective
Hot Topics in Drug Product Process Validation: A Reviewer s Perspective Colleen Thomas, Ph.D. Quality Assessment Lead (Acting) FDA/CDER/OPQ/OPF Division of Microbiology Assessment CASSS CMC Strategy Forum
More informationProcess validation in medical devices
Process validation in medical devices Fulfil requirements with expert regulatory guidance 1TÜV SÜD Contents INTRODUCTION 4 VALIDATION PLANNING 5 INSTALLATION QUALIFICATION 7 OPERATIONAL QUALIFICATION 9
More informationSetting Specifications for Biotech Products
Setting Specifications for Biotech Products Session 1: What to Control? Presentation by an EU Regulator Nanna Aaby Kruse, Senior Biological Assessor, member of BWP and BMWP WHAT TO CONTROL? Control of
More informationUSP Chapter 823 USP 32 (old) vs. USP 35 (new)
USP Chapter 823 USP 32 (old) vs. USP 35 (new) Sally W. Schwarz, MS, BCNP Research Associate Professor of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, MO Why USP Chapter ? FDA has
More informationWHO PUBLIC INSPECTION REPORT (WHOPIR) Finished Product Manufacturer. Mylan Nashik ( Sinnar in CRM) AND
SOP 408.4 Annex D 20, avenue Appia CH-1211 Geneva 27 Switzerland Tel central +41 22 791 2111 Fax central +41 22 791 3111 www.who.int WHO PUBLIC INSPECTION REPORT (WHOPIR) Finished Product Manufacturer
More informationValidation Requirements for Nutrition Products
DC1 Validation Requirements for Nutrition Products Supply Division Dimitris Catsoulacos Quality Assurance Specialist UNICEF Supply Division Nutrition Supplier Meeting 14-16 June 2017, Copenhagen Slide
More informationQuality Risk Management (ICH Q9): WHO Model for Sustainable Quality Medicines
Quality Risk Management (ICH Q9): WHO Model for Sustainable Quality Medicines Longe Sunday Anthony Head- Quality Assurance May & Baker Nigeria Plc. Pharmacentre, Ota, Nigeria eaglesconsult@gmail.com; Slonge@may-
More informationTrinity College Dublin QP Forum 2017 Tuesday 25 th April
Trinity College Dublin QP Forum 2017 Tuesday 25 th April HPRA QUESTIONS & ANSWERS 1. What is the approach being taken for audit of contamination control strategies as per chapters 3 & 5? What is the current
More informationA.1 Contents file 4 to 5 A.1 (1)
Contents file 4 to 5 Contents file 4 to 5 A Information Contents file 4 to 5 A.2 Index file 4 to 5 A.3 List of Abbreviations A.4 Glossary A.5 Adress-Register A.6 References B Japanese Regulations B.1 MHW
More informationManaging Quality in Pharmaceutical Industry Using Six Sigma. Edited by Mahmoud Farouk Moussa TQM, CSSBB, MBA
Managing Quality in Pharmaceutical Industry Using Six Sigma Edited by Mahmoud Farouk Moussa TQM, CSSBB, MBA Outlines Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Process and Drug Product Quality. Process Excellence Approach
More informationStrategic Implantation of PAT : FDA Perspective
Strategic Implantation of PAT : FDA Perspective Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. CDER, FDA MOHEB.NASR@FDA.HHS.GOV IFPAC 2008 Strategic Implantation of PAT Baltimore, MD January 27, 2008 Outline The Desired State -
More informationPROCESS VALIDATION: AN ESSENTIAL PROCESS IN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY
WORLD JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES Vijayasree et al. SJIF Impact Factor 6.647 Volume 6, Issue 3, 367-874 Review Article ISSN 2278 4357 PROCESS VALIDATION: AN ESSENTIAL PROCESS IN PHARMACEUTICAL
More informationProposed New USP General Chapter: The Analytical Procedure Lifecycle 1220
Page 1 of 9 STIMULI TO THE REVISION PROCESS Stimuli articles do not necessarily reflect the policies of the USPC or the USP Council of Experts Proposed New USP General Chapter: The Analytical Procedure
More informationValidation. An Easy to Understand Guide Validating Purified Water Systems
Validation Overview Validation Documentation Validation Activities Validation Mistakes Validation Protocols Test Selection Common Verifications When to test Test Layout and Content Validation Protocol
More informationReview Article Review on Quality by Designing for Metered Dose Inhaler Product Development Santosh R. Thorat * 1, Sarika M.
Scholars Academic Journal of Pharmacy (SAJP) Sch. Acad. J. Pharm., 2015; 4(6): 324-330 Scholars Academic and Scientific Publisher (An International Publisher for Academic and Scientific Resources) www.saspublisher.com
More informationLifecycle Management of Process Analytical Technology Procedures
Lifecycle Management of Process Analytical Technology Procedures IFPAC 2015 Marta Lichtig Senior Scientist in New Testing Technologies, ACS Member Contents General Comparison : PV guide to NIR model development
More informationThe ultimate specification for Audit Trails A simple guideline for the so called Audit Trail Review
The ultimate specification for Audit Trails A simple guideline for the so called Audit Trail Review What is exactly a GMP Audit Trail purpose, objective, types and implementation? What is an Audit Trail
More informationStrategies for Risk Based Validation of Laboratory Systems
Strategies for Risk Based Validation of Laboratory Systems Video Web Seminar September 23, 2004 Ludwig Huber E-mail: ludwig_huber@agilent.com Today s Agenda Background information: why risk assessment,
More informationRisk Management in Drug Product Manufacturing with Emphasis on Batch Documentation/Execution
Risk Management in Drug Product Manufacturing with Emphasis on Batch Documentation/Execution Manufacturing Breakout Session I Jack Pellett (Genentech) and Eleni Dokou (Vertex) What are typical lead-times
More informationQbD approach and Regulatory Challenges in Europe
QbD approach and Regulatory Challenges in Europe DIA 26th Annual EuroMeeting, Vienna 2014 Dr Peter Richardson Head of Quality, European Medicines Agency An agency of the European Union Disclaimer The views
More informationGood Automated Manufacturing Practices (GAMP)
Good Automated Manufacturing Practices (GAMP) Klaus Krause, Amgen ISPE/GAMP Americas Steering Committee ISPE San Francisco/Bay Area Chapter Meeting, October 7, 2004 Presentation Overview I. GAMP - Organization
More informationCMC Forum Europe, 2013
Lessons Learned from Two Case Studies in the FDA QbD Biotech Pilot CMC Forum Europe, 2013 Lynne Krummen, Ph.D. Global Head Roche Technical Regulatory, Biologics Global Lead, Roche QbD Core Team Case Study
More informationSupplier Oversight PQRI. September Steven Lynn, MS, CMQ/OE Vice President Global Quality Compliance Mylan
Supplier Oversight September 2014 PQRI Steven Lynn, MS, CMQ/OE Vice President Global Quality Compliance Mylan Agenda Mylan Background Setting the Stage with a Scenario Current State Thinking Supplier Qualification
More informationQbD implementation in Generic Industry: Overview and Case-Study
QbD implementation in Generic Industry: Overview and Case-Study Inna Ben-Anat, QbD Strategy Leader, Teva Pharmaceuticals IFPAC JAN 2013 R&D Three Core Components of QbD and Generic Industry: How Do They
More informationContinuous Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: CGMP, Process Validation, and Inspectional Considerations for Implementation
Continuous Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: CGMP, Process Validation, and Inspectional Considerations for Implementation Christina Capacci-Daniel, Ph.D. Consumer Safety Officer / Acting Quality Assessment
More informationEvolution of Quality Assessments Recent Trends in FDA Queries. Mike Saleh, Pfizer Inc.
Evolution of Quality Assessments Recent Trends in FDA Queries Mike Saleh, Pfizer Inc. Outline 1. Background 2. Assessment of Information Requests from Recent NDAs 3. Distribution of queries (by focus area)
More informationComputerised System Validation
Computerised System Validation Considerations for the Validation Lifecycle Paul Moody GMP Conference 12 th November 2014 Regulatory References EU GMP Annex 11 (2011) http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-4/annex11_01-2011_en.pdf
More informationCOMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)
European Medicines Agency Pre-authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 22 February 2006 EMEA/CHMP/BMWP/42832/2005 COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON SIMILAR
More information