Implications for Online Distribution of Brands in Europe
|
|
- Norman Stevenson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Day After Coty: Implications for Online Distribution of Brands in Europe On December 7, 2017, 24 hours after the EU Court of Justice (CoJ) handed over the eagerly awaited Coty judgment, Steptoe hosted the first roundtable discussion on the implications of the CoJ ruling for the future of online distribution of luxury and other branded goods in Europe. The panel was moderated by Steptoe Partners Yves Botteman and Jean-Nicolas Maillard and included: A video recording of the debate is also available online. The Panel Ms. Emma Trogen, Legal Director, Cosmetics Europe Mr. Stefan Krawczyk, Associate General Counsel & Head of Government Relations International, ebay Mr. Jakob Kucharczyk, Vice President, Competition & EU Regulatory Policy, Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) Ms. Julie Bousin, Lawyer at the Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs, acting for the French Government before the EU Court of Justice in the Coty case Steptoe Moderators Yves Botteman Partner ybotteman@steptoe.com Jean-Nicolas Maillard Partner jmaillard@steptoe.com 1
2 The Coty Case in a Nutshell Coty Inc., a US-based perfume manufacturer, amended its selective distribution agreement with a view to preventing its retailers from reselling the contract products through online marketplaces, such as Amazon. A German authorized reseller, Parfumerie Akzente, did not agree with this limitation and engaged in the resale of the Coty products through the Amazon.de website. In a reference for preliminary ruling relating to the compatibility of this clause with EU competition law, the CoJ ruled that: First, selective distribution systems intended to protect the luxury image of a brand are compatible with EU competition law, provided that the qualitative criteria for selective distribution (i) are related to the properties of the product, (ii) are applied consistently and uniformly without discrimination across the system and (iii) are not disproportionate. Second, as part of such selective distribution systems, luxury brand owners may prohibit authorized distributors from using third party platforms for the online sale of the contract goods, provided that this restriction is proportionate to the objective of protecting the aura of luxury around the branded product Third, marketplace bans imposed by luxury suppliers do not amount to hardcore restrictions of competition within the meaning of the VBER. In particular, such bans do not amount to an absolute ban against online sales (à la Pierre Fabre) nor a limitation as to the customer group to whom the reseller may sell the luxury goods. 1. First Reactions of the Panelists The moderators shared the first reactions from a number of key stakeholders. Coty published a short, but enthusiastic press release; similarly, the European Commission (EC) welcomed the judgment, insofar as it provides more legal certainty and should ensure uniform enforcement across the EU internal market. Contrasting with these reactions, Andreas Mundt, President of the German Bundeskartellamt, noted that the Coty judgment does not affect its decisional practice, which is focused on branded, as opposed to luxury goods. Unsurprisingly, the brand owners side of the panel warmly welcomed the judgment as very satisfying, noting that it was fully in line with the positions they advocated before the CoJ. They noted that the judges endorsed the ban on account, among others, that the third-party platforms logos are discernible and could be a source of confusion to consumers. They also praised the CoJ for clarifying the scope of the Pierre Fabre judgment to confine it to absolute online sales bans. Equally unsurprisingly, platforms representatives showed more circumspection as to the practical implications of the judgment. More specifically: The judgment validates marketplace bans only insofar as they apply to luxury goods. As a result, the impact of the judgment on marketplaces business model would be limited since they primarily resell mass market products, where the debate is arguably still open. Coty deprives resellers from an important online sales channel as they do not have the technical skills and financial means to develop online retail spaces to sell cross-border or through mobile apps. They took issue with a couple of specific points in the judgment, namely: the creation of a quasipresumption that online marketplaces cannot protect the luxury image of a product, and the lack of in -depth discussion on the proportionality of a marketplace ban, in particular since less onerous alternatives to such bans were available. 2
3 2. What Does Luxury Mean? While the scope of the CoJ judgment appears to be strictly limited to luxury goods, the concept of luxury is not as such defined in the judgment. The CoJ reiterates, however, that luxury must be assessed not only by reference to the material characteristics of a given product or service, but also in view of the allure and prestigious image which bestows on them an aura of luxury. All panelists agreed that this definition of luxury is ambiguous and expect that the concept will trigger more debates, and probably more legal disputes. The brand owners side of the panel somewhat minimized the impact of the judgment on this front, noting that the questions referred to the CoJ by the referring court focused on luxury goods. This explains why the definition of luxury was not debated at the hearing and why the judgment does not provide practical guidance with regards to other branded goods. For the platforms side, however, the ambiguity of the concept of luxury is one of the main issues raised by the judgment. The CoJ gives a glimpse of what it considers as luxury goods, when noting that the Pierre Fabre products, only distributed in pharmacies in accordance with selective distribution agreements, are not luxury products, but merely cosmetic and hygiene goods. This is a confusing remark: the CoJ here seems to somehow depart from the aura approach it advocated in the judgment to adopt a product-based approach. This exemplifies how blurry the dividing line between luxury and nonluxury goods can be and prefigures the debates to come. Owing to this ambiguity, they anticipate that certain brand owners may be tempted to stamp their fastmoving consumer goods as luxury for the sole purpose of imposing a marketplace ban to their online distributors. While large online marketplaces have not taken issue with selective distribution systems imposing platform bans for luxury products, they see more difficulties in the situation where platform bans are imposed, sometimes even outside of a selective distribution system, with regards to nonluxury goods. A Steptoe comment: what constitutes luxury is expected to be a sticking point going forward. This said, in the third question put before the Court, the CoJ arguably means that a marketplace ban, irrespective of the luxury character of the contract products, should not be viewed as a hardcore restriction of competition under the Vertical Restraints exemption rules; in particular, whether or not the product qualifies as luxury, the ban limits neither passive sales nor the customer groups to whom resellers may sell the contract products. While this may well be an accurate interpretation of the judgment, reading between the lines, the Bundeskartellamt may have a different take on the treatment to be reserved to marketplace bans affecting other branded products, in particular, by prosecuting them as restrictions by object. 3
4 3. Ban Justified by Absence of Contractual Link Between Supplier and Marketplace The CoJ justifies the proportionality of the marketplace ban based on the absence of direct contractual relationship between Coty and third-party platforms. According to the CoJ, the absence of such exclusive association between the supplier and the marketplace is an obstacle for Coty to ensure that the online marketplace complies with the qualitative criteria agreed between Coty and the authorized distributor. On the brand owners side, the need for a direct contractual relationship between brand owners and distributors was a central point of advocacy: selective distribution is precisely about creating a relationship of trust with a chosen partner. The recognition of this need by the CoJ was therefore seen as a positive development. Incidentally, and while the CoJ does not make this point (contrary to Advocate General Wahl), the brand owners side noted that establishing a direct contractual relationship is also the best way to guarantee that distributors do not resell the products on marketplaces that feature counterfeit goods. The platforms representatives strongly disagreed. For them, the lack of direct contractual relationship is a false issue. A less onerous alternative to a platform ban would be for brand owners to subject the distribution of products through marketplaces to pre-defined criteria. This solution would enable brand owners to terminate the selective distribution agreement if the authorized distributor were to sell the products through marketplaces or in a fashion that does not meet the selective criteria (e.g. marketplaces that include counterfeit goods). The moderators then asked what would happen if a brand owner appoints an online marketplace as authorized distributor or has itself created a boutique on such a marketplace, and, at the same time, seeks to restrict authorized resellers from using this same online marketplace. The platforms representatives confirmed that this is a common scenario. The EC dealt with this issue in the final report of the e- commerce sector inquiry in a rather satisfying way, by noting that brand owners who appoint an online marketplace as authorized distributor should be particularly careful when restricting other authorized distributors. They also insisted that marketplaces are increasingly innovating to ensure that resellers can comply with the qualitative requirements imposed by brand owners (e.g. own reseller shops that reflect the look and feel of a brand or dedicated brand showrooms). A Steptoe comment: in putting the emphasis on the need for a direct contractual relationship between brand owners and distributors, the CoJ may have overlooked the complexity of certain tripartite relationships between brands, distributors and platforms. This may raise further issues in the near future. 4
5 4. Towards Diverging Approaches at National Level? The moderators noted a risk of diverging national approaches in view of the apparent contrasting reactions among European competition authorities: the EC welcomed the judgment, while the Bundeskartellamnt issued a more cautious statement, indicating that the Coty judgment did not impact its current enforcement agenda, which may mean that they still intend to prohibit certain marketplace bans as restrictions by object. The platforms representatives shared the same concern. They noted that luxury carries different meanings across Member States. Similarly, marketplaces market penetration rates vary significantly throughout Europe. According to the EC e-commerce sector inquiry, 62% of German retailers use marketplaces, as opposed to only 13% in Italy and 4% in Belgium. Therefore, in practice, a marketplace ban is likely to be much more impactful in Germany than in Belgium. Finally, in response to a question from the audience, the moderators noted that an EC intervention may be warranted in order to ensure that EU Member States adopt a consistent approach in relation to marketplace bans. In this regard, the EC should probably act sooner rather than later to avoid a Booking.com situation, which could preclude the EC from acting in view of pre-existing and ongoing enforcement at national level. Such intervention could take several forms, including: the review of the vertical guidelines; the filing of amicus curiae briefs before national courts dealing with platform bans; or, perhaps, the launch of individual investigations. A Steptoe comment: divergent approaches have in fact already materialized. This is the case, for instance, in relation to sport shoes. In a recent judgment, the District Court of Amsterdam ruled that sports good manufacturer Nike had a luxury image, and therefore was allowed to impose a ban on non -authorized platforms to its selective distributor in order to protect this image. By contrast, in France and Germany, the national competition authorities compelled Asics and Adidas, Nike s competitors, to remove marketplace ban clauses. 5
EU Competition Webinar Series (Part II) Keeping Distributors in Check in the Online Space
EU Competition Webinar Series (Part II) Keeping Distributors in Check in the Online Space June 29, 2017 This presentation is informational and is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal
More informationWhich limitations regarding the internet can be imposed on the members of a selective network? The Coty judgment of the European Court of Justice
Which limitations regarding the internet can be imposed on the members of a selective network? The Coty judgment of the European Court of Justice Ginevra Bruzzone IDI Conference 2018 Florence, 8-9 June
More informationOnline distribution: New horizons
Online distribution: New horizons Jan Jeram, White & Case Slovenian Competition Day, September 2018 The opinions expressed in this presentation are personal to the author and do not necessarily represent
More informationSelective distribution and resale bans on internet
Selective distribution and resale bans on internet 7 December 2017 Index Index... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 2 BACKGROUND... 2 ANALYSIS... 3 1. Compatibility with Article 101.1 of the TFEU of selective distribution
More informationSelective distribution after Coty and the interplay of the geo-blocking regulation with competition law
Selective distribution after Coty and the interplay of the geo-blocking regulation with competition law Fabian Kaiser DG Competition, Digital Single Market Task Force The views expressed are purely personal
More information1. INTRODUCTION 2. PRESENTATION OF THE FÉDÉRATION. 6 April 2017
CONTRIBUTION OF FÉDÉRATION FRANÇAISE DE LA COUTURE, DU PRÊT-À- PORTER DES COUTURIERS ET DES CRÉATEURS DE MODE TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION S PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE E-COMMERCE SECTOR INQUIRY 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationIPPT , CJEU, Coty v Parfumerie Akzente. Court of Justice EU, 6 December 2017, Coty v Parfumerie Akzente
Court of Justice EU, 6 December 2017, Coty v Parfumerie Akzente restriction of customers, within the meaning of Article 4(b) of that regulation, or a restriction of passive sales to end users, within the
More informationE-commerce and EU competition law
E-commerce and EU competition law Szilvia SZEKELY DG Competition, Digital Single Market Task Force The views expressed are purely personal and do not necessarily represent an official position of the European
More informationCNMI CONTRIBUTION TO THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION S PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE E-COMMERCE SECTOR INQUIRY
CNMI CONTRIBUTION TO THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION S PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE E-COMMERCE SECTOR INQUIRY 1. BACKGROUND On 6 May 2015, the European Commission ( Commission ) launched
More informationE-Commerce of Healthcare Products in the EU
E-Commerce of Healthcare Products in the EU Dr. Ann-Christin Richter, LL.M. (Durham) Basel, 19 May 2017 Introduction (I) Growing importance of online sales (goods and services) Online sales turnover in
More informationONLINE DISTRIBUTION & COMPETITION LAW UNINE, 16 NOVEMBER 2016
ONLINE DISTRIBUTION & COMPETITION LAW UNINE, 16 NOVEMBER 2016 BRICK AND MORTAR VS ONLINE DISTRIBUTION Distribution channels and distribution agreement Restriction of online sales Ban on internet sales
More informationAmCham EU comments on the European Commission s Preliminary Report on the E-Commerce Sector Inquiry
AmCham EU comments on the European Commission s Preliminary Report on the E-Commerce Sector Inquiry Promoting e-commerce across the EU - fostering free and open competition while protecting innovation
More informationMARKETPLACE BANS HAVE SPARKED
Antitrust, Vol. 32, No. 3, Summer 2018. 2018 by the American Bar Association. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated
More informationCompetition issues in Online Retailing
China / EU Competition Week Beijing, 12 March 2014 Competition issues in Online Retailing Josep M. CARPI BADIA Deputy Head of Unit COMP/E2 (Antitrust: Consumer Goods, Basic Industries and Manufacturing)
More informationCompetition policy and e-commerce: Learning from the sector inquiry and decisional practice. The role of the EU Commission and NCAs
Competition policy and e-commerce: Learning from the sector inquiry and decisional practice. The role of the EU Commission and NCAs Introduction Prof. Dr. Heike Schweitzer, LL.M. (Yale) Freie Universität
More informationSelective Distribution and its Role in Brand Reputation, Choice and Competition
Selective Distribution and its Role in Brand Reputation, Choice and Competition Symposium on Trends in Retail Competition Oxford, 9 June 2017 Dr. Robert Schulz, BSH Hausgeräte B S H H O M E A P P L I A
More informationBSH Position Paper regarding Preliminary Report on E-Commerce Sector Inquiry
B S H H A U S G E R Ä T E G M B H Munich, 25 November 2016 BSH Position Paper regarding Preliminary Report on E-Commerce Sector Inquiry 1. Executive Summary The BSH Home Appliances Group ( BSH ) places
More informationMost Favored Nation Clauses: Is It the End of the Road?
Most Favored Nation Clauses: Is It the End of the Road? Webinar co-hosted by Steptoe & Oxera Consulting 25 October 2017 Today s webinar agenda What are MFNs? Why are the European authorities concerned?
More informationAMWAY S RESPONSE TO THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE E-COMMERCE SECTOR INQUIRY
AMWAY S RESPONSE TO THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE E-COMMERCE SECTOR INQUIRY November 18, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Amway welcomes the European Commission s publication
More information14th EU-China Competition Week: Analytical framework for investigating non-price vertical agreements
14th EU-China Competition Week: Analytical framework for investigating non-price vertical agreements François Renard 24 March 2017 Shenzhen Allen & Overy 2017 Key issues related to Non-Price Vertical Restraints
More informationCompetition Law. Newsletter. July Recent developments in EU and Greek. Competition Law
Competition Law Newsletter July 2017 Recent developments in EU and Greek Competition Law Recent developments in EU and Greek Competition Law Introduction On the 17 th of July, the Hellenic Competition
More informationProfessor Richard Whish Helsinki 11 October 2018
Professor Richard Whish Helsinki 11 October 2018 OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION VERTICAL AGREEMENTS THE COMMISSION S E-COMMERCE SECTOR INQUIRY RECENT CASES ON VERTICAL AGREEMENTS IN THE EU EXCESSIVE PRICING IS
More information15th Annual ACE Conference 2017
15th Annual ACE Conference 2017 1 Asics: Restraints on Retailers Internet Sales in a Selective Distribution System Madrid, 17 November 2017 The views expressed are those of the presenter and do not necessarily
More informationCASE NOTE JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE, 13 OCTOBER 2011, PIERRE FABRE DERMO-COSMÉTIQUE SAS
CASE NOTE JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE, 13 OCTOBER 2011, PIERRE FABRE DERMO-COSMÉTIQUE SAS, C-439/09 CONCERNING ANOTHER RESTRICTION BY OBJECT ON INTERNET SALES BAN Dr. iur. Verena Klappstein,
More informationOnline retail in the new VRBE State of play and perspectives
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE, MINING AND COMMODITIES TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION PHARMACEUTICALS AND LIFE SCIENCES Online retail in the new VRBE State of play and perspectives Mélanie
More informationReports on the e-commerce sector inquiry and modern forms of distribution in the internet age
CLPD SYMPOSIUM : THE E-COMMERCE SECTORY INQUIRY Reports on the e-commerce sector inquiry and modern forms of distribution in the internet age Kristina Nordlander & Pola Karolczyk Sidley Austin * 1. Introduction
More informationCPI Antitrust Chronicle May 2015 (1)
CPI Antitrust Chronicle May 2015 (1) Most Favored Nation Clauses: A French Perspective on the Booking.com Case Olivier Billard & Pierre Honoré Bredin Prat www.competitionpolicyinternational.com Competition
More informationCOMPETITION LAW: SELECTIVE DISTRIBUTION AND ONLINE SALES
COMPETITION LAW: SELECTIVE DISTRIBUTION AND ONLINE SALES WHERE ARE WE HEADING? For more information on the Antitrust Alliance and contact information, please visit the website: www.antitrust-alliance.org.
More informationInternet Sales and Contractual Restrictions of Competition Law Lessons learnt from the EU e- Commerce Sector Inquiry
Internet Sales and Contractual Restrictions of Competition Law Lessons learnt from the EU e- Commerce Sector Inquiry Some examples Nespresso.gr (499) Delonghi Nespresso Lattissimo Pro Statistics on e-commerce
More informationthe European Commission publishes final report on the e-commerce sector inquiry.
May 2017 the European Commission publishes final report on the e-commerce sector inquiry. Executive Summary On 10 May 2017, the European Commission ("Commission") published its much anticipated Final Report
More informationVertical Agreements: A New Priority in Antitrust Enforcement. Vertical restraints and the on-line world
Vertical Agreements: A New Priority in Antitrust Enforcement Vertical restraints and the on-line world Rom March 6, 2014 Marcel Balz Bundeskartellamt General Policy Division Short outlook 2 Reasons for
More informationAssonime contribution to the Commission Consultation. on the Preliminary Report on the E-Commerce Sector Inquiry
Assonime contribution to the Commission Consultation on the Preliminary Report on the E-Commerce Sector Inquiry 1. Importance of the Sector Inquiry We commend the Commission for the decision to include
More informationCorinne Khayat UGGC Avocats Paris UIA Valence (2015)
Corinne Khayat UGGC Avocats Paris UIA Valence (2015) Why selective distribution for the fashion industry? 2 An attempt to define «fashion» «Fashion» is commonly defined as a distinctive and often habitual
More informationCase summary 27 May 2014
Case summary 27 May 2014 Call for refusal to supply by WALA Heilmittel GmbH, Bad Boll/Eckwälden Sector: Ref.: Natural cosmetics B2-52/14 Date of decision: 6 May 2014 On 6 May 2014, the Bundeskartellamt
More informationSelective distribution networks and parallel imports within EU countries
Selective distribution networks and parallel imports within EU countries Maurizio Iorio, Attorney at Law The aim of this article is to answer the following question: can a producer or a national exclusive
More informationJOINT WORKING PARTY OF THE BARS AND LAW SOCIETIES OF THE UNITED KINGDOM ON COMPETITION LAW (JWP)
JOINT WORKING PARTY OF THE BARS AND LAW SOCIETIES OF THE UNITED KINGDOM ON COMPETITION LAW (JWP) COMMENTS ON THE COMMISSION PROPOSAL FOR A REVISED BLOCK EXEMPTION AND GUIDELINES ON VERTICAL AGREEMENTS
More informationVertical restraints, digital marketplaces, and enforcement tools
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Johannes Laitenberger Director-General for Competition, European Commission Vertical restraints, digital marketplaces, and enforcement tools ICN Annual Conference 2018 New Delhi, 22
More informationVertical Agreements and the Internet: An economic assessment
CCR - Competition Competence Report Spring 2014/1 Vertical Agreements and the Internet: An economic assessment Why is it important to ask a competition economist, with which school of thought he is affiliated?
More informationThe A-Soft Case (Online Distribution): An European and German Perspective
The A-Soft Case (Online Distribution): Colloque internationale : L application du droit de la concurrence dans le secteur numérique Jeudi 17 novembre 2016 Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense Prof.
More informationchapter 14 ioannis apostolakis 1
chapter 14 SELECTIVE DISTRIBUTION AND ONLINE SALES AFTER THE PIERRE FABRE DECISION OF THE CJEU ioannis apostolakis 1 SUMMARY The treatment of vertical restraints under Article 101 TFEU by the European
More informationLegal evaluation and practical approach for the assessment of vertical restraints
Legal evaluation and practical approach for the assessment of vertical restraints Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato 6 March 2014 Vito Auricchio Matteo Padellaro Table of contents Resale
More informationEU Competition Law and E-Commerce: Love-hate relationship?
EU Competition Law and E-Commerce: Love-hate relationship? Giorgio Monti 22 August 2015 Three themes 1. What does EU competition law have to say with regard to the way e-commerce is developing? 2. How
More informationTERRITORIAL VERTICAL RESTRAINTS UNDER EU LAW
TERRITORIAL VERTICAL RESTRAINTS UNDER EU LAW Konstantina Strouvali European Commission DG Competition, Unit A1 Antitrust case support and policy 14th EU China Competition Week Shenzhen, 24 March 2017 Background
More informationABA Antitrust Section Joint Conduct Committee E-Bulletin
The New EU Competition Rules Regarding Vertical Restraints and the Proposed Revision of the Rules Regarding Horizontal Cooperation Agreements Filippo Amato and Marcus Pollard Jones Day Brussels (Belgium)
More informationVertical restraints on online sales
CCR - Competition Competence Report Spring 2013/2 Vertical restraints on online sales The sale of branded goods over the internet increases. Brand manufacturers try to impose vertical restraints on those
More informationCompetition Policy Enforcement in the Retailing Industry. Valérie Meunier Autorité de la concurrence
Competition Policy Enforcement in the Retailing Industry Valérie Meunier Autorité de la concurrence Outline I. Groceries sector II. Specialised and selective distribution networks III.E-commerce 2 I. Groceries
More informationOnline Vertical Restraints: divergence of competition policy
July 2017 Online Vertical Restraints: divergence of competition policy Fiona Scott Morton, Yale University CRESSE Online commerce is often good for competition Brown, J. R. and A. Goolsbee (2002). Does
More informationVertical Restraints: The Proposed Amendments to the Block Exemption Regulation And Guidelines
Vertical Restraints: The Proposed Amendments to the Block Exemption Regulation And Guidelines Henriette Tielemans htielemans@cov.com + 32 2 549 52 52 David Hull dhull@cov.com + 32 2 549 52 35 Miranda Cole
More informationCOMMENTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTION INSTITUTE ON THE PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE E-COMMERCE SECTOR INQUIRY
International Distribution Institute COMMENTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTION INSTITUTE ON THE PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE E-COMMERCE SECTOR INQUIRY The International Distribution Institute deals since
More informationVertical Agreements: New Competition Rules for the Next Decade
Antitrust Vertical Agreements: New Competition Rules for the Next Decade Magdalena Brenning-Louko, Andrei Gurin, Luc Peeperkorn and Katja Viertiö ( 1 ) Introduction ( 1 ) On 20 April 2010 the Commission
More informationCOMMENTS ON THE REVIEW OF COMPETITION RULES FOR THE DISTRIBUTION SECTOR
COMMENTS ON THE REVIEW OF COMPETITION RULES FOR THE DISTRIBUTION SECTOR Contributors: Luca Toffoletti (Partner and head of antitrust practice Milan Office); Bernard O Connor (Partner - Brussels Office);
More informationAugust THE APPOINTMENT OF THE AUDITOR AND THE DURATION OF THE AUDIT ENGAGEMENT: Striving for a Workable Single Market in the EU
Federation of European Accountants Fédération des Experts comptables Européens Briefing Paper Standing for trust and integrity August 2014 THE APPOINTMENT OF THE AUDITOR AND THE DURATION OF THE AUDIT ENGAGEMENT:
More informationEU Competition Webinar Series (Part I) Achieving A Successful Product Launch
EU Competition Webinar Series (Part I) Achieving A Successful Product Launch 23 May 2017 Copyright 2017 Steptoe & Johnson LLP PRESENTATION OF TODAY S PANEL AND TOPIC 2 Today s Panel Yves Botteman Partner
More information2. Facebook is a US American company. Why does the Bundeskartellamt have competence to investigate in this case?
19 December 2017 Background information on the Facebook proceeding 1. What is an abuse of dominance proceeding? Antitrust enforcement is largely based on three tools. One is the prosecution of cartel agreements
More informationVERTICAL RESTRAINTS IN ELECTRONIC COMMERCE: AN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE
Lear Competition Note VERTICAL RESTRAINTS IN ELECTRONIC COMMERCE: AN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE May 2013 In the past decades the internet has become a very active distribution channel, bringing benefits to consumers
More informationCOMMISSION PRELIMINARY REPORT
COMMISSION PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE E-COMMERCE SECTOR INQUIRY - PRELIMINARY OPINION OF INDEPENDENT RETAIL EUROPE - 9 NOVEMBER 2016 2 PRELIMINARY COMMENTS OF INDEPENDENT RETAIL EUROPE ON THE COMMISSION
More informationEDPB publishes draft Guidelines on territorial scope of the GDPR
EDPB publishes draft Guidelines on territorial scope of the GDPR The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) has published the eagerly awaited Guidelines 3/2018 on the territorial scope of the GDPR (Article
More informationPublic Interest Regimes in the European Union differences and similarities in approach. Final Report of the EU Merger Working Group 10 March 2016
Public Interest Regimes in the European Union differences and similarities in approach Final Report of the EU Merger Working Group 10 March 2016 Introduction 1. The EU Merger Working Group (EUMWG) decided
More informationContribution to the Preliminary Report on the E-commerce Sector Inquiry
EU Registration number: 62379572263-63 Contribution to the Preliminary Report on the E-commerce Sector Inquiry INTRODUCTION The Comité Colbert, the association gathering luxury houses and cultural institutions
More informationDO Ahold. RĒ HT stakeholder input; comments regarding review block exemption regulation and guidelines on vertical restraints.
DO Ahold European Commission Directorate-General for Competition Antitrust Registry Ref.: HT.l 171 - stakeholder input 1049 Bruxelles / Brussel BELGIQUE / BELGIË ROYAL AHOLD Corporate Executive Board Peter
More informationCase T-19/92. Groupement d'achat Edouard Leclerc v Commission of the European Communities
Case T-19/92 Groupement d'achat Edouard Leclerc v Commission of the European Communities (Selective distribution system Luxury cosmetic products) Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber,
More informationBRIEF POLICY. Competition Policy and E-Commerce after the EU Commission Sector Inquiry: What Comes Next? Abstract. Issue 2017/08 April 2017
Issue 2017/08 April 2017 POLICY BRIEF Competition Policy and E-Commerce after the EU Commission Sector Inquiry: What Comes Next? Marco Botta & Maria Luisa Stasi, ENTraNCE Abstract On 3 March 2017, the
More information4/13/2018. Evolving Standards on Resale Price Maintenance, Tying and Other Vertical Restraints. Program Overview
Evolving Standards on Resale Price Maintenance, Tying and Other Vertical Restraints Practising Law Institute: Developments in Antirust Law & Regulation 2018 Craig G. Falls 2018 Dechert LLP Program Overview
More informationTaming the Tech Titans Competition Law and Digital Markets in Germany
Taming the Tech Titans Competition Law and Digital Markets in Germany Outline 1. Introduction 2. Anticompetitive agreements in digital markets 3. Abuse of dominance in digital markets 4. Merger control
More informationA S Watson Europe response to the Commission's review of the Block Exemption Regulation and Guidelines on vertical restraints
Register of interest representatives identification number: 3779891566-57 A S Watson Europe response to the Commission's review of the Block Exemption Regulation and Guidelines on vertical restraints I.
More informationSelective Distribution Competition law issues which must be addressed in a selective distribution agreement
Selective Distribution Competition law issues which must be addressed in a selective distribution agreement Fabio Bortolotti BBMPartners - BUFFA, BORTOLOTTI & MATHIS Gerhard Fussenegger bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte
More informationTechnology, Media and Telecommunications Webinar. E-commerce & E-collusion: Hipster Antitrust or Real Risk? Global Antitrust & Competition
Technology, Media and Telecommunications Webinar Global Antitrust & Competition E-commerce & E-collusion: Hipster Antitrust or Real Risk? 4 September 2018 Presenters Helen Brown + 44 20 7919 1876 Helen.Brown@bakermckenzie.com
More informationMAIN THEME FRIDAY 6 JUNE 2008 DISTRIBUTION AND INTERNET. The Impact of Internet on Agency, Distributorship and Franchising Agreements
MAIN THEME FRIDAY 6 JUNE 2008 DISTRIBUTION AND INTERNET The Impact of Internet on Agency, Distributorship and Franchising Agreements The main tools used at present for organizing a distribution network
More informationPUBLIC CONSULTATION ON GEO-BLOCKING AND OTHER GEOGRAPHICALLY-BASED RESTRICTIONS WHEN SHOPPING AND ACCESSING INFORMATION IN THE EU
The Consumer Voice in Europe PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON GEO-BLOCKING AND OTHER GEOGRAPHICALLY-BASED RESTRICTIONS WHEN SHOPPING AND ACCESSING INFORMATION IN THE EU Summary of BEUC s response Contact: Agustín
More informationINTERNATIONAL DIGITAL PUBLISHING FORUM ANTITRUST COMPLIANCE POLICY AND GUIDELINES
INTERNATIONAL DIGITAL PUBLISHING FORUM ANTITRUST COMPLIANCE POLICY AND GUIDELINES It is the policy of the International Digital Publishing Forum ("IDPF" or "the Forum") to comply with all antitrust and
More informationMEMORANDUM FROM THE FRENCH AUTHORITIES
Paris, 10 November 2016 MEMORANDUM FROM THE FRENCH AUTHORITIES Re: free flow of data between economic stakeholders The European Commission has begun laying the groundwork for integrating the free flow
More informationThe FEBEA s comments on the European Commission. electronic commerce Issues Paper. ( Opportunities in Online Goods and Services: Issues Paper )
The FEBEA s comments on the European Commission electronic commerce Issues Paper ( Opportunities in Online Goods and Services: Issues Paper ) These are the initial comments by the members of the FEBEA
More informationThe e-commerce sector inquiry
The e-commerce sector inquiry American-Hellenic Chamber of Commerce & Hellenic Competition Commission Athens, 23 February 2017 Rosario Rende Granata* DG Competition, DSM Taskforce *The views expressed
More informationE-commerce. Traditional grocery retailers online. Pure play ecommerce retailers. the (new) rules of the (new) game?
E-commerce Traditional grocery retailers online Pure play ecommerce retailers the (new) rules of the (new) game? Today E-Commerce: How can brand manufacturers prepare and adapt? An example: Amazon disrupting
More informationWorkshop on Protecting Consumers in Peer Platform Markets. Agenda
Committee on Consumer Policy Workshop on Protecting Consumers in Peer Platform Markets Agenda 8 November 2017, 14:00-18:00 OECD Conference Centre Introduction Peer-to-peer transactions have long played
More informationImplications of the EC s guidelines on. Pat Treacy Partner, Bristows
Implications of the EC s guidelines on vertical agreements Pat Treacy Partner, Bristows Agenda Introduction (1) Buyer power thresholds (2) Internet sales: passive and active selling (3) Pricing, territorial
More informationVertical restraints An economist s perspective
Vertical restraints An economist s perspective Prof. Dr. Georg Götz Justus Liebig University Giessen European Competition Day 2018 Vienna, 24 September 2018 Starting point Restrictions by object vs. the
More informationIndependent Regulators Group Rail. IRG Rail
IRG-Rail (15) 6 Independent Regulators Group Rail IRG Rail Position Paper on the new proposals concerning governance and the award of public service contracts with a strong focus on the role of the regulatory
More informationImplications of E-commerce for Competition Policy - Note by Germany
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development DAF/COMP/WD(2018)57 DIRECTORATE FOR FINANCIAL AND ENTERPRISE AFFAIRS COMPETITION COMMITTEE English - Or. English 28 May 2018 Implications of E-commerce
More informationUpdated Policies and Procedures FAQ
Updated Policies and Procedures FAQ We re updating the global Policies and These updates have been published and will take effect on August 1, 2018. On July 2, the updated version can be found in Virtual
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 4.6.2012 SWD(2012) 136 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN
More informationStatement pursuant to the revision of the Vertical Group Exemption Regulation (EC) no. 2790/99 and its Guidelines
Statement pursuant to the revision of the Vertical Group Exemption Regulation (EC) no. 2790/99 and its Guidelines 2 A. Organisation and contacts The EDL (Association of European Distribution Lawyers) is
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Communities
L 203/30 1.8.2002 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle
More informationOnline Marketplace Bans: Mapping the Landscape under the -commerce Sector Inquiry
Online Marketplace Bans: Mapping the Landscape under the -commerce Sector Inquiry Vyron Anastasiadis The recent outburst of Internet selling has led several suppliers to amend their selective distribution
More informationa) Certain issues would be better dealt with in national law than at Community level:
R E P U B L I C O F H U N G A R Y MINISTRY OF JUSTICE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE H-1055 Budapest, Kossuth tér 4. Tel: (+36-1) 441-3743, Fax: (+36-1) 441-3742 Reference: Response to the Consultation paper
More informationStronger NCAs Procedures, Powers, Prospects
21 st Annual EU Competition Law and Policy Workshop Stronger NCAs Procedures, Powers, Prospects ORGANIZED BY PHILIP LOWE, MEL MARQUIS and GIORGIO MONTI Conclusions 1. The Workshop welcomed a presentation
More informationEUROPEAN TRAVEL RETAIL CONFEDERATION REPRESENTING DUTY FREE AND TRAVEL RETAIL IN EUROPE. Espace Voyageur
Espace Voyageur The duty free and travel retail industry is a unique market that caters to the international traveller. The European duty free and travel retail industry generated 10.2 billion in sales
More informationQuestions concerning the sale of new motor vehicles
Frequently Asked Questions During the transition period 1 provided for in Article 10 of Regulation 1400/2002, the Commission received a number of questions relating to the application of the Regulation.
More informationThe CPI Antitrust Journal June 2010 (2)
The CPI Antitrust Journal June 2010 (2) Internet Sales and the New EU Rules on Vertical Restraints Filippo Amato Jones Day www.competitionpolicyinternational.com Competition Policy International, Inc.
More informationCommittee on Industry, Research and Energy Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 28.2.2017 2016/2276(INI) DRAFT REPORT on online platforms and the digital
More informationGuidance on who needs to notify
Guidance on who needs to notify Application and Scope of the Regulations for Video On Demand (VOD) services Edition 3.1 Originally published 19 October 2010 Re-published 21 March 2011 ATVOD Guidance on
More informationACEA response to the Commission evaluation report on the operation of Regulation EC 1400/2002 concerning motor vehicle distribution and servicing
ACEA response to the Commission evaluation report on the operation of Regulation EC 1400/2002 concerning motor vehicle distribution and servicing This is the response of the European Automobile Manufacturers
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER
EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 22 January 2010 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER INTERPRETATIVE NOTE ON DIRECTIVE 2009/72/EC CONCERNING COMMON RULES FOR THE INTERNAL MARKET IN ELECTRICITY AND DIRECTIVE
More informationGAMES WORKSHOP S 2013 AUTHORIZED DISTRIBUTOR POLICY
GAMES WORKSHOP S 2013 AUTHORIZED DISTRIBUTOR POLICY EFFECTIVE: June 15, 2013 ISSUED BY: GAMES WORKSHOP RETAIL, INC. ( GAMES WORKSHOP ) SUMMARY Only distributors who are authorized to do so by GAMES WORKSHOP
More informationImplications of E-commerce for Competition Policy - Note by France
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development DAF/COMP/WD(2018)58 DIRECTORATE FOR FINANCIAL AND ENTERPRISE AFFAIRS COMPETITION COMMITTEE English - Or. French 5 June 2018 Implications of E-commerce
More informationImplications of E-commerce for Competition Policy - Note by Romania
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development DAF/COMP/WD(2018)40 DIRECTORATE FOR FINANCIAL AND ENTERPRISE AFFAIRS COMPETITION COMMITTEE English - Or. English 23 May 2018 Implications of E-commerce
More informationProposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2017) XXX draft Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 2009/73/EC concerning common rules for the internal market
More informationResponse to the Questionnaire on Contract Rules for Online Purchases of Digital Content and Tangible Goods
Response to the Questionnaire on Contract Rules for Online Purchases of Digital Content and Tangible Goods ZVEI Zentralverband Elektrotechnik- und Elektronikindustrie e. V. German Electrical and Electronic
More informationRebates: Formalism, Effects and the Real World
1 CPI s Europe Column Presents: Rebates: Formalism, Effects and the Real World By Lia Vitzilaiou (Lambadarios Law Firm) June 2016 1. Introduction 1. Rebates by dominant undertakings are a controversial
More informationReview. Opinion of Advocate General in Google Adwords trade mark infringement reference. Commercial & Dispute Resolution
September 2009 Review Commercial & Dispute Resolution Opinion of Advocate General in Google Adwords trade mark infringement reference Advocate General Poiares Maduro has given his opinion in the three
More information