April 8, Daniel P. Wolf Executive Secretary Minnesota Public Utilities Commission th Place East, Suite 350 St. Paul, Minnesota
|
|
- Rosamond Price
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 April 8, 2016 Daniel P. Wolf Executive Secretary Minnesota Public Utilities Commission th Place East, Suite 350 St. Paul, Minnesota RE: Comments on Notice Seeking Comment on Procedural Schedule, In the Matter of an Alternative Rate Design Stakeholder Process for Xcel Energy Docket No. E-002/M Dear Mr. Wolf: Fresh Energy and Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy (MCEA) submit these comments in response to the notice issued on February 16, 2016 by the Commission in the abovementioned docket. We appreciate the effort by Commissioners, staff, and other stakeholders to seek input on principles and objectives to guide rate design in Minnesota. We want to note the significant efforts we and other stakeholders have invested in the alternative rate design stakeholder work to date in this docket and in stakeholder discussions led by the Department. We also note that alternative rate designs, in particular time-varying rates, were identified in the recent Commission staff report on the stakeholder grid modernization workshops in Docket No Attachment 1 to these comments summarizes the series of comment periods, stakeholder meetings, and Commission hearings that have occurred in this docket and Xcel Energy s last rate case to date. Regarding the list of draft principles and objectives for alternative rate design Attachment A in the Commission s notice The draft principles and objectives accurately capture the goals of what rate design should achieve in Minnesota. In addition, the principles and objectives are inclusive of (but not limited to) the principles of rate design published by James Bonbright in his seminal and oft-cited work Principles of Public Utility Rates (see Attachment 2). The notice s proposed objective three states that rates should be equitable, generally based on costcausation principles and avoiding cross-subsidies, unless it is necessary to meet explicit state policy goals (emphasis added). While this objective is important, there are inherent cross subsidies in the current rate structures among customers in the same customer class. For example, the costs to connect and service a customer that lives in a large apartment complex are likely significantly smaller per customer than the costs to connect customers that live in single family homes in less populated areas of a utility s service territory. Short of applying a unique rate to every customer that accounts for every costs incurred by that customer, cross-subsidies at some level are unavoidable in the rate-making process. The Commission should be cautious of seeking to address one or several specific cross-subsidies at the risk of creating or exacerbating others.
2 Regarding the attached list of proposed initial rate design options Attachment B in the Commission s notice In general, the five proposed initial rate design options are appropriate at this time. Each rate design has been implemented and tested in utility service territories in other states, and some have already been used here in Minnesota. While some of the rate design options face significant implementation challenges for some utility service territories (for example, current and future metering infrastructure capabilities), these rate designs warrant further discussion and study as utility investments, Commission decisions in other dockets, and advancing technologies change the landscape for these designs. Revenue Decoupling Mechanisms Revenue decoupling mechanisms are generally not included in customer rate design discussions, and it is important to distinguish the difference between the intended outcomes of decoupling and rate design. In our August 7, 2015 comments in Docket no. E002/M , Fresh Energy and MCEA included the following table to clarify the different intentions: However, based on the principles and objectives presented in Attachment A of the Commission s notice, revenue decoupling is a viable policy for achieving objective 4 of maintaining revenue stability. At the same time, revenue decoupling preserves objective 5 regarding conservation and energy efficiency by implementing adjustments through a volumetric rate. The Commission should consider how revenue decoupling mechanisms complement the proposed alternative rate designs under discussion. Pilot Rate Design Projects In our December 1, 2015 Comments in this docket, Fresh Energy and MCEA recommended that the Commission direct Xcel Energy to develop a suite of time of use rate pilots that can help the utility, the Commission, and stakeholders assess the impact of these rates on customer s experiences and bills, energy conservation, and other rate design goals. 1 In those comments we also highlighted the robust time-of-use pilot that the Company proposed to the Commission in Docket no. E002/M The Company s initial pilot proposal in that document is attached to these comments in Attachment 3. As the Company s proposal in that docket shows, time-of-use rates can be designed and implemented in a variety of different ways that can impact customer behavior change outcomes. 1 Clean Energy Organizations (December 1, 2015). Comments. Docket no. E002/CI
3 In response to the Commission s December 18, 2015 Order in this docket, Xcel filed a compliance filing report on metering capabilities of the Company s current AMR meters and the functionalities of AMI meters. 2 We understand that the Company s current 2 period residential whole house time of use rate and the electric vehicle rate tariff use the Company s existing AMR meters. The Company s filing indicated a shortage of meters available for customers on these tariffs: A meter exchange is required for customers who choose to change from a total consumption tariff to a TOU tariff. Xcel Energy has a few hundred existing meters that could be used for commercial installations and almost non-existent stock for residential type applications. 3 We are concerned if there is indeed a shortage, as these meters are necessary for Commission-approved tariffs available to the whole residential customer class. Once any meter supply concerns are addressed, we understand that these same meters can be used for other 2 period time-of-use rate pilots that study the customer adoption, energy savings, and bill effects of an on-peak period shorter than the 12 hour period in the current time of use tariff. Building on the information submitted by Xcel in this docket on the current metering capabilities, we recommend that the Company develop new time-of-use rate proposals. Previous Rate Design Pilots Minnesota Power is currently engaging in a multi-faceted rate design pilot testing time-of-use and critical peak pricing rates with groups of customers in its service territory. The best lessons we can learn from these reports are potential impacts on peak load to reduce coincident system peak demand (objective 6) and customer understanding and satisfaction with the pilots (objective 7). Attachment 4 provides a preliminary report on Minnesota Power s time-of-use pilot as of March 6, 2014, as provided on the SmartGrid.gov website. 4 Similarly, Attachment 5 provides an update and requested adjustment on the utility s time-of-use pilot program, as well as preliminary results on the critical peak pricing pilot currently underway for a subset of Minnesota Power s residential customers. Low customer charges based on marginal costs, time-of-use rates, and revenue decoupling mechanisms best meet the principles and objectives in Attachment A Customer charges based on the marginal cost to serve one additional residential customer with very small use levels, with the remainder of the revenue difference made up in a higher volumetric rate, best meet the following objectives: Objective 2: Rates should be based on marginal costs. Customer charges based on marginal cost, not average or embedded costs, best meet this objective. 2 Compliance Filing from Xcel Energy (February 16, 2016). Xcel Energy Informational Metering Report. Docket No. E002/M Ibid. Page
4 Objective 3: Rates should be equitable, generally based on cost-causation principles and avoiding cross-subsidies, unless it is necessary to meet explicit state policy goals. As discussed above, cross-subsidies occur in all customer classes and are inevitable in a rate design that falls short of recovering every cost incurred by a customer from that customer. Customer charges based on marginal costs appropriately meet the cost-causation principles in this objective. Objective 5: Rates should encourage conservation and energy efficiency. Ensuring that a greater portion of a customer s bill is recovered through a volumetric rate preserves customers financial incentive to invest in energy efficiency and engage in conservation practices and behaviors. Objective 7: Rates should be stable, understandable, and provide customer choices. Low customer charges and subsequently higher volumetric charges ensure that customers pay directly for the energy they use, which is an understandable concept for many customers. Furthermore, this concept provides customers with choices regarding how they use their energy, and preserves the potential for customers to generate their own energy if they choose. Objective 8: Rates should encourage economically efficient decision-making. Ensuring that a greater portion of a customer s bill is recovered through a volumetric rate preserves the price signal to customers to use energy economically and avoid wasting energy. Time-of-use rates best meet the following objectives: Objective 6: Rates should reduce coincident system peak demand. Time-of-use rates that accurately align on-peak rates with coincident system peak demand sends the appropriate price signal to customers to reduce energy use at coincident peak times. Objective 9: Rates should be aligned with wholesale market prices that reflect the varying price of electricity throughout the day and year. Time-of-use rates that accurately reflect wholesale market prices for the utility in on-peak rates for customers will effectively achieve this objective. Revenue decoupling mechanisms best meet the following objective: Objective 4: Rates should allow a utility to recover its revenue requirement in a manner that maintains utility revenue stability, and minimizes year-to-year under- or over-collections. Decoupling provides revenue stability by ensuring that the utility recovers its Commissionapproved revenue requirement, no more and no less. Through regular adjustments on customer bills decoupling accounts for under- or over-collection of utility revenues in a given time period, with applicable caps to minimize fluctuations from year to year.
5 Policies to ensure low-income and other at-risk or medical needs customers can continue with alternative rate designs Minnesota currently has Low Income Home Energy Assistance Programs (LIHEAP) through state agencies and several investor-owned utilities in the state. These programs served an estimated 156,068 households in the state with heating assistance in fiscal year However, not all low-income customers who qualify for LIHEAP actually receive LIHEAP. As noted by Pam Marshall in Xcel Energy s previous rate case, roughly 25 percent of Xcel Energy s residential customers qualify for LIHEAP but only 5.57 percent of customers received LIHEAP assistance in One policy that may help low income customers who do not receive LIHEAP assistance is a lifeline rate that discounts the first very low-use block of energy used. Applying this to all residential customers will ensure that low-use customers will receive a discounted rate. 7 This also encourages customers above this block to use less, satisfying objective 5 regarding energy efficiency and conservation. Considerations for customers who have specific at-risk or medical needs are critical when determining the impacts of utility rates on customers. Rates should first be set to meet the broader objectives and principles proposed in the Commission s notice, then seek to offer exceptions and provisions to ensure that low-income and vulnerable customers receive affordable electric service. The scope of this proceeding should stay focused on residential customers While many of the principles and objectives laid out in the Commission notice could also apply to rates for industrial and commercial customers, there are significant differences in use patterns and customer diversity within the Commercial and Industrial customer classes that warrant additional discussion. Some rate structures in the commercial and industrial customer sectors, such as demand charges that are not coincident with the utility s peak demand, can serve as disincentives for companies to invest in energy efficiency, combined heat and power, and other on-site generation investments that may otherwise be cost effective under different rate formulas. However, we are concerned that opening the scope of this docket to include commercial and industrial customer rate designs will divert stakeholder resources from developing actionable pilots that move this discussion forward after stakeholders have already invested nearly two years of effort developing the record. Therefore, we recommend that the focus of this docket remain on rate designs for the residential customer class. Recommendations Fresh Energy and MCEA recommend that the Commission: Adopt the proposed principles and objectives for determining rate design in Minnesota, 5 LIHEAP Action Center. Minnesota results. 6 Direct Testimony of Pam Marshall. Docket no. E002/GR Filed June 5, Page The record provided by Pam Marshall and Roger Colton record in Xcel Energy s last rate case shows that the majority of low-income customers are low-use customers. Docket no. E002/GR
6 Find that the initial rate design options are appropriate for consideration at this time, and the Commission should include revenue decoupling mechanisms as a means to achieve objective 4, Find that low customer charges based on marginal costs, time-of-use rates, and revenue decoupling mechanisms best achieve the proposed principles and objectives, Evaluate LIHEAP, lifeline rates, and alternative rate design exemptions as appropriate policies for ensuring service at affordable costs for low-income, at-risk, and medical needs customers while offering alternative rate designs to the general residential customer class, and Keep the scope of the proceeding focused on the residential customer class at this time. We also recommend that the Commission direct Xcel Energy to develop a series of proposed time-of-use rate pilots designed to meet the adopted rate design principles and objectives. These pilots should test different time-of-use implementation strategies to: Determine the best application for Xcel Energy s residential customers, Address customer engagement needs to ensure customers are familiar with their rates, and Incorporate best practices from studies and reports from other states and utility experience in Minnesota. Please contact us at the information below with any questions. Sincerely, /s/ Will Nissen Will Nissen Director, Energy Performance Fresh Energy 408 Saint Peter Street, Suite 220 St. Paul, MN (651) nissen@fresh-energy.org /s/ Holly Lahd Holly Lahd Director, Energy Markets Fresh Energy 408 Saint Peter Street, Suite 220 St. Paul, MN (651) lahd@fresh-energy.org /s/ Hudson Kingston Hudson Kingston Staff Attorney Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy
7 26 East Exchange Street, Suite 206 St. Paul, MN (651)
Minneso Saint Paul, VIA. Wolf: Dear Mr. Sincerely, Staff Attorney
Minneso ota Center for Environ nmental Advocacy 26 East Exchange Street Suite 206 Saint Paul, MN 55101 1667 651.223.5969 December 21, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Mr. Daniel P. Wolf Executive Secretary Minnesota
More informationVIA E-DOCKET ELECTRONIC FILING April 15, 2015
Midwest Cogeneration Association P.O. Box 87374 Carol Stream, IL 60188 (630) 323-7909 midwestcogen@ameritech.net VIA E-DOCKET ELECTRONIC FILING April 15, 2015 Mr. Daniel Wolf Executive Secretary Minnesota
More informationImproving the way we price our network services. Consultation paper
Improving the way we price our network services Consultation paper October 2015 Table of Contents 1 Overview... 4 2 Background... 6 3 Purpose... 7 4 Network tariff strategy... 7 4.1 Network tariff reform
More informationSustainable impacts in the Midwest energy industry. AESP Midwest and Wisconsin Chapters April 11, 2018
Sustainable impacts in the Midwest energy industry AESP Midwest and Wisconsin Chapters April 11, 2018 MINNESOTA REGULATORY INNOVATIONS FOR 2020 AND BEYOND: From Business Model to Energy Efficiency Carl
More informationDocket Number E999/CI Request for Stakeholder Perspectives
November 18, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Mr. Daniel Wolf, Executive Secretary Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 121 7th Place East, Suite 350 St. Paul, MN 55101-2147 Re: Docket Number E999/CI- 15-556
More informationStrategic Direction for Eskom s Retail Tariffs 2011 onwards
Strategic Direction for Eskom s Retail Tariffs 2011 onwards Author & Presenter: Deon Conradie B Eng (Hons) University of Pretoria, MBL Unisa Senior Manager (Electricity Pricing), Eskom Co-author: S Salvoldi
More informationRocky Mountain Power Docket No Witness: Joelle R. Steward BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
Rocky Mountain Power Docket No. 13-035-184 Witness: Joelle R. Steward BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Direct Testimony of Joelle R. Steward Cost of Service
More informationDaniel P. Wolf Executive Secretary Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 121 7th Place E., Suite 350 St. Paul, MN 55101
November 16, 2018 Via Electronic Filing Daniel P. Wolf Executive Secretary Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 121 7th Place E., Suite 350 St. Paul, MN 55101 Re: Comments on Xcel Energy s 2019 VOS calculation
More informationDemand based network tariffs offering a new choice
Version 1.1 30 September 2015 Demand based network tariffs offering a new choice Consultation paper September 2015 Table of Contents 1 Overview... 5 2 Background... 7 3 Purpose... 8 4 Network tariff strategy...
More information..H;:jc 2iCT is i:,:2e
..H;:jc 2iCT is i:,:2e STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CONSUMER ENERGY ALLIANCE Docket No. DE 1 6-5 76 RE: ALTERNATIVE NET METERING DOCKET PREFILED TESTIMONY OF CONSUMER ENERGY
More informationHEARING EXHIBIT 200 ANSWER TESTIMONY OF HOWARD GELLER
ANSWER TESTIMONY OF HOWARD GELLER PROCEEDING A-0E IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO FOR AUTHORIZATION TO IMPLEMENT A REVENUE DECOUPLING ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM AS PART
More informationMinimum electricity feed-in tariffs to apply from 1 July 2018 draft decision
26 January 2018 By email: fitreview@esc.vic.gov.au Energy Division Essential Services Commission Victoria Level 37, 2 Lonsdale Street Melbourne Victoria 3000 Dear Commission, Minimum electricity feed-in
More informationNew technologies + old tariffs = Problem!
New technologies + old tariffs = Problem! Simon Coates Concept Consulting 8 March 2017 www.concept.co.nz The same technologies have dominated electricity for decades Centralised, economies of scale generation
More informationHow to Submit Your Question
Mike Ganley & Rich Larochelle CEO Web Conference June 2, 2010 How to Submit Your Question Step 1: Type in your question here. Step 2: Click on the Send button. Presenters Mike Ganley Director Strategic
More informationA Decoupling Foundation
A Decoupling Foundation Missouri PSC Workshop on Decoupling Presented by Richard Sedano September 17, 2015 The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT 05602 Phone: 802-223-8199
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Develop a Successor to Existing Net Energy Metering Tariffs Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 2827.1,
More informationInquiry into solar feed-in pricing in Queensland
15 April 2016 Mr Kim Wood, Principal Commissioner Solar Feed-In Pricing Inquiry Queensland Productivity Commission PO Box 12112 George St QLD 4003 Inquiry into solar feed-in pricing in Queensland Dear
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL SCHUETTE ATTORNEY GENERAL. April 16, 2012
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL P.O. BOX 30755 LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909 BILL SCHUETTE ATTORNEY GENERAL April 16, 2012 Ms. Mary Jo Kunkle Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission
More informationCustomer-Sited Resources and Utility Profits:
Customer-Sited Resources and Utility Profits: Aligning Incentives with Public Policy Goals Florida Public Service Commission 7 August 2008 Frederick Weston The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street,
More informationNARUC Town Hall. Nashville, TN July 23, 2016
Overview of Draft Manual on Distributed Energy Resources Compensation NARUC Town Hall Nashville, TN July 23, 2016 Chris Villarreal Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Chair, NARUC Staff Subcommittee
More informationPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY 2017 GENERAL RATE CASE PHASE II PREPARED TESTIMONY EXHIBIT (PG&E-1) VOLUME 1 REVENUE ALLOCATION AND RATE DESIGN
Application: 1-0- (U M) Exhibit No.: Date: June 0, 01 Witness(es): Various PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY 01 GENERAL RATE CASE PHASE II PREPARED TESTIMONY EXHIBIT VOLUME 1 REVENUE ALLOCATION AND RATE
More informationAGENDA DOCKET FORM. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive update on the rate structure analysis and provide direction.
AGENDA DOCKET FORM SUBJECT: RATE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS UPDATE Agenda Item No. Revised 11 Meeting Date: July 11, 2018 Resolution: No SUMMARY: Contra Costa Water District (District) is conducting a comprehensive
More information1800 M Street NW Suite 400S Washington DC 20036
1800 M Street NW Suite 400S Washington DC 20036 October 28, 2016 Hon. David J. Collins Executive Secretary to the Commission Maryland Public Service Commission 6 St. Paul Street Baltimore MD 21202 RE:
More informationMaking the Case for Energy Efficiency Policy Support: Results from the EPA / DOE Energy Efficiency Benefits Calculator
Making the Case for Energy Efficiency Policy Support: Results from the EPA / DOE Energy Efficiency Benefits Calculator Snuller Price, Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. Katrina Pielli and Stacy Angel,
More informationTariff Reform Working Group Meeting #2. 28 January 2015
Tariff Reform Working Group Meeting #2 28 January 2015 Agenda Meeting objectives Inform and seek feedback Recap Tariff reform principles Network pricing arrangements - rule change Revenue cap What makes
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ) FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL CHANGE IN ) DOCKET NO. -0-U RATES AND TARIFFS ) Direct
More informationBILL NO.: House Bill 163 Electricity Combined Heat and power Systems - Metering
STATE OF MARYLAND OFFICE OF PEOPLE S COUNSEL Paula M. Carmody, People s Counsel 6 St. Paul Street, Suite 2102 Baltimore, Maryland 21202 410-767-8150; 800-207-4055 www.opc.maryland.gov BILL NO.: House Bill
More informationNet Energy Metering (NEM) Strategy Recommendations a. NEM Export Adder
February 7, 2018 East Bay Community Energy 1111 Broadway, 3rd Floor Oakland, CA 94607 Via Email Submission to LDBPcomments@ebce.org Re: Comments on East Bay Community Energy s Draft Local Development Business
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
OCA Statement No. 1 BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Petition of PECO Energy Company for : Approval of its Smart Meter Technology : Docket No. M-2009-2123944 Procurement and Installation
More informationEnbridge Gas New Brunswick Cost of Service and Rate Design Testimony Prepared January 15, 2010
0 0 Enbridge Gas New Brunswick Cost of Service and Rate Design Testimony Prepared January, 0 Section - Introduction Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS. A. H. Edwin Overcast P. O. Box McDonough,
More informationCOUNCIL FINANCE COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY. SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION Residential Electric Time of Use (TOU) Pilot Study
COUNCIL FINANCE COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Staff: Lance Smith, Utilities Strategic Financial Director Randy Reuscher, Utilities Rate Analyst Justin Fields, Utilities Rate Analyst Date: January 23, 2017
More informationA Fixed Cost Recovery Mechanism Proposal
A Fixed Cost Recovery Mechanism Proposal DISTRICT XI HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL November 30, 2018 Fixed Cost Recovery Mechanisms: Background What is a Fixed Cost Recovery
More informationINTERVENOR REQUEST FORM
Intergovernmental Affairs The Public Utilities Board 400 330 Portage APPENDIX I INTERVENOR REQUEST FORM PAGE 1 OF 2 1. Application Re Hearing: Cost of Service Study Methodology Review 2. Name of Requesting
More informationAlberta Energy - Capacity Market Framework Engagement December 2017
Capacity Market Cost Allocation - Response Template The engagement is seeking stakeholder feedback on the questions below. Please submit your responses to these questions, and any additional input on this
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *
Page of BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO FOR AUTHORIZATION TO IMPLEMENT A REVENUE DECOUPLING
More informationRATE DESIGN IN A HIGH DER ENVIRONMENT
RATE DESIGN IN A HIGH DER ENVIRONMENT A Way Forward PRESENTED TO MEDSIS Rate Design Workshop PRESENTED BY Sanem Sergici, Ph.D. September 20, 2018 Copyright 2018 The Brattle Group, Inc. Agenda Searching
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *
Page of BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * RE: IN THE MATTER OF ADVICE LETTER NO. -ELECTRIC FILED BY PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TO REPLACE COLORADO PUC NO.
More informationDonna Williams, Contracting Officer, United States Department of Energy
To: Donna Williams, Contracting Officer, United States Department of Energy From: Rick Hornby, Bob Fagan, Bruce Biewald Date: May 6, 2009 Re: Notice of Intent for the Smart Grid Investment Grant Program
More informationOctober 17, Advice No Electric Tariff Filing Filed Electronically
October 17, 2018 Filed Via Web Portal Mr. Mark L. Johnson, Executive Director and Secretary Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission P.O. Box 47250 Olympia, WA 98504-7250 RE: Advice No. 2018-42
More informationENA WEBINAR DRAFT ELECTRICITY NETWORK TARIFF REFORM HANDBOOK
WEBINAR DRAFT ELECTRICITY NETWORK TARIFF REFORM HANDBOOK 27 APRIL 2016 PURPOSE OF THE WEBINAR To share contents of the Electricity Network Tariff Reform Handbook Draft for Consultation To discuss the draft
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF ITS CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE- ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE-ELECTRIC
More information100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd Saint Paul, Minnesota Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155
Minnesota House of Representatives Minnesota Senate 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 January 23,
More informationMidwest Cogeneration Association P.O. Box Carol Stream, IL (630)
Midwest Cogeneration Association P.O. Box 87374 Carol Stream, IL 60188 (630) 323-7909 info@cogeneration.org VIA e-filing September 30, 2013 Dr. Burl Haar, Executive Secretary Minnesota Public Utilities
More informationDoug Scott, Vice President of Strategic Initiatives, Great Plains Institute
Page1 To: Fr: RE: Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Doug Scott, Vice President of Strategic Initiatives, Great Plains Institute Summary of e21 Roundtable Meetings convened by the Great Plains Institute
More informationWelcome. Energy Solutions Conference February 20, Minnesota Case Study Cost-Effectiveness Practices. Adam Zoet Minnesota Department of Commerce
Midwest Welcome Energy Solutions Conference February 20, 2019 Minnesota Case Study Cost-Effectiveness Practices Adam Zoet Minnesota Department of Commerce 2/27/2019 1 Overview 1. Minnesota Background 2.
More informationRate Design: Basics and What s Possible
Rate Design: Basics and What s Possible Northeast Regional Meeting National Association of State Energy Officials April 12, 2018 Synapse Energy Economics Founded in 1996 by CEO Bruce Biewald Based in Cambridge,
More informationNational Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Regulatory Partnership Program
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Regulatory Partnership Program The Energy Regulation Board of Zambia (ERB) and the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) Third Activity Cost
More informationPREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF BETH MUSICH SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
Application No: Exhibit No.: Witness: A.-- Beth Musich ) In the Matter of the Application of San Diego Gas & ) Electric Company (U 0 G) and Southern California ) Gas Company (U 0 G) for Authority to Revise
More informationAmerican Public Power Association: Public Power Forward Initiative
American Public Power Association: Public Power Forward Initiative Paul Zummo Manager of Policy Research & Analysis American Public Power Association California Municipal Rates Group Los Angeles, CA April
More informationPENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HOUSE CONSUMER AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HOUSE CONSUMER AFFAIRS COMMITTEE HEARING - HOUSE BILL 107 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 26, 2017 (9:30 AM) HARRISBURG, PA TESTIMONY OF JOHN R. EVANS, SMALL BUSINESS ADVOCATE ELIZABETH
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Docket No. DG DIRECT TESTIMONY DAVID B. SIMEK AND GREGG H.
w C C IT Liberty Utilities STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Distribution Service Rate Case DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID B. SIMEK AND GREGG H. THERRIEN April, 0 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY
More informationSuperseding Sheet No. 152 REVISED SHEET NO. 152 Effective June 1, 2017 Effective January 1, 2018
Superseding Sheet No. 152 REVISED SHEET NO. 152 Effective June 1, 2017 Effective January 1, 2018 REVENUE BALANCING ACCOUNT ( RBA ) PROVISION Supplement To: Schedule R - Residential Service Schedule G -
More informationMassachusetts Grid Modernization
Massachusetts Grid Modernization Summary of Utility Proposals December 17, 2015 The Need for Modernization The energy system in Massachusetts is undergoing an unprecedented transition as disruptive, consumer-centric
More informationStakeholder Comments Template Review TAC Structure Straw Proposal
Stakeholder Comments Template Review TAC Structure Straw Proposal This template has been created for submission of stakeholder comments on the Review Transmission Access Charge (TAC) Structure Straw Proposal
More informationStakeholder Comments Template
Stakeholder Comments Template Submitted by Company Date Submitted Tony Zimmer tony.zimmer@ncpa.com 916-781-4229 Northern California Power Agency July 25, 2017 Please use this template to provide your written
More informationThe 1991 Legislature enacted the Mandates
State of Minnesota OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR Social Service Mandates Reform July 30, 1997 97-08 The 1991 Legislature enacted the Mandates Reform Law, authorizing county demonstration projects to
More informationPROJECT NO TX
PROJECT NO. 2008-TX060-0001 PROCEEDING TO CONSIDER AND DETERMINE WHETHER TO IMPLEMENT THE FEDERAL RATEMAKING STANDARDS FOR INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLANNING, RATE DESIGN MODIFICATIONS TO PROMOTE ENERGY EFFICIENCY
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VERIFIED APPLICATION
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO FOR APPROVAL OF A NUMBER OF STRATEGIC ISSUES RELATING TO ITS DSM PLAN,
More informationSTATE OF RHODE ISLAND PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ) IN RE: NATIONAL GRID GAS ) DOCKET NO APPLICATION TO IMPLEMENT NEW RATES ) )
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ) IN RE: NATIONAL GRID GAS ) DOCKET NO. 3943 APPLICATION TO IMPLEMENT NEW RATES ) ) REPLY BRIEF OF ENVIRONMENT NORTHEAST CONCERNING THE NATIONAL GRID DECOUPLING
More informationPERFORMANCE-BASED REGULATION
PERFORMANCE-BASED REGULATION Aligning utility incentives with policy objectives and customer benefits A 21 st Century Electricity System Issue Brief By Advanced Energy Economy September 2017 San Francisco
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking To Enhance the Role of Demand Response in Meeting the State s Resource Planning Needs and Operational Requirements.
More informationSolar Photovoltaic Volumetric Incentive Program 2015 Report to the Legislative Assembly
Solar Photovoltaic Volumetric Incentive Program 2015 Report to the Legislative Assembly Prepared by: Oregon Public Utility Commission January 1, 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 2 Background...
More informationRegulatory Workshop on Regional Electricity Trade and Market Development Hanoi, Vietnam
Regulatory Workshop on Regional Electricity Trade and Market Development Hanoi, Vietnam Pricing and Determining Cost Reflective Rates at National Level April 23, 2014 Historic Tariff Structure (Static)
More informationNatural Gas Energy Efficiency Programs in the Regulatory and Policy Environment: The National Perspective
Natural Gas Energy Efficiency Programs in the Regulatory and Policy Environment: The National Perspective Market Transformation Symposium Washington, DC March 30, 2009 Courtney K. Brown Public Policy Analyst
More informationQCOSS Energy Consumer Advocacy Project. QCOSS Submission to the QCA Interim Consultation Paper on Regulated Retail Electricity Prices for
QCOSS Energy Consumer Advocacy Project QCOSS Submission to the QCA Interim Consultation Paper on Regulated Retail Electricity Prices for 2013-14 19 October 2012 Introduction The Queensland Council of Social
More informationENERGY INDEPENDENCE AND SECURITY ACT OF 2007 New PURPA Standards (16-19) Management Policy Statement of Decatur County REMC
ENERGY INDEPENDENCE AND SECURITY ACT OF 2007 New PURPA Standards (16-19) Management Policy Statement of Decatur County REMC INTRODUCTION The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 proposes changes
More informationBEFORE THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF KANSAS DIRECT TESTIMONY DIANE MUNNS ON BEHALF OF ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND
BEFORE THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF KANSAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DIANE MUNNS ON BEHALF OF ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND DOCKET NO. -WSEE--RTS 0 0 I. INTRODUCTION Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME
More informationBEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION
BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR A HEARING TO DETERMINE THE FAIR VALUE OF THE UTILITY PROPERTY OF THE COMPANY FOR RATEMAKING
More informationProject Timeline Testimony of Southern California Edison Company
Application No.: Exhibit No.: Witnesses: R.12-06-013 SCE-130 B. Anderson R. Garwacki J. Lim A. Ramirez C. Sorooshian (U 338-E) Project Timeline Testimony of Southern California Edison Company Before the
More informationAlberta Energy Capacity Market Framework Engagement December 2017
Capacity Market Cost Allocation - Response Template The engagement is seeking stakeholder feedback on the questions below. Please submit your responses to these questions, and any additional input on this
More informationCounties Power Limited
Counties Power Limited Electricity Distribution Business Pricing Methodology Disclosure 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019 Pursuant to Electricity Information Disclosure Information for compliance with Part
More informationReview of Salt River Project s Proposed Residential Customer Generation Price Plan. Prepared for Salt River Project
Review of Salt River Project s Proposed Residential Customer Generation Price Plan Prepared for Salt River Project December 31, 2014 Project Team Amparo Nieto Vice President About NERA Economic Consulting
More informationEXPLORING THE UTILITY OF THE FUTURE IN PENNSYLVANIA
EXPLORING THE UTILITY OF THE FUTURE IN PENNSYLVANIA January, 2016 Proceedings Report EXPLORING THE UTILITY OF THE FUTURE IN PENNSYLVANIA January, 2016 KLEINMAN CENTER STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS In 2015, the
More informationComments of the Citizens Utility Board of Illinois on NARUC s Draft Manual on Distributed Energy Resources Compensation
September 2, 2016 Commissioner Travis Kavulla, President National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners 1101 Vermont Avenue, NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20005 Comments of the Citizens Utility
More informationCOMMENTS ON XCEL ENERGY S RENEWABLE*CONNECT PROPOSAL DOCKET
COMMENTS ON XCEL ENERGY S RENEWABLE*CONNECT PROPOSAL DOCKET 15-985 Advanced Energy Economy (AEE) applauds Xcel Energy ( Xcel ) for initiating an option allowing Minnesota customers to procure renewable
More informationElectricity Distribution Rate Design for Commercial & Industrial Customers
Electricity Distribution Rate Design for Commercial & Industrial Customers Consultations Fall 2017 Purpose Why Change Approach Potential Impact 2 Balancing OEB Objectives Connection & capacity Cost shifting
More informationNSPM Rate Design Pilot
NSPM Rate Design Pilot Stakeholder Meeting May 5, 2017 Agenda and Purpose Agenda Introduction of MN Pilot Development A. Liberkowski Concept and Goals Pilot Development Timeline MN Time of Use Rate Option
More informationFrom the Electricity Networks Association. Comment on the Electricity Authority s Sunk Costs Working Paper
From the Electricity Networks Association Comment on the Electricity Authority s Sunk Costs Working Paper 15 November 2013 The Electricity Networks Association makes this submission along with the explicit
More informationFor decades, electricity prices for larger commercial
Rates Use Great Caution in Design of Residential Demand Charges Jim Lazar For decades, electricity prices for larger commercial and industrial customers have included demand charges, which recover a portion
More informationSmart Grid Investment Grant Consumer Behavior Studies: Background and Current Efforts
Smart Grid Investment Grant Consumer Behavior Studies: Background and Current Efforts Peter Cappers Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory November 7, 2011 1 Background on Utility Industry: Metering and
More informationELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY
DRAFT Report ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY Navajo Tribal Utility Authority August 2007 DRAFT NAVAJO TRIBAL UTILITY AUTHORITY ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY Table of Contents
More informationCalifornia s Approach to Designing a Net Energy Metering (NEM) Tariff. Sara Kamins California Public Utilities Commission June 18, 2014
California s Approach to Designing a Net Energy Metering (NEM) Tariff 1 Sara Kamins California Public Utilities Commission June 18, 2014 2 California Presentation topics California s energy market and
More informationEnergy Department Report on Electricity Markets and Reliability
Quick Insights Energy Department Report on Electricity Markets and Reliability RESEARCH QUESTION What are the key findings and recommendations from the Staff Report to the Secretary on Electricity Markets
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Oversee ) the Resource Adequacy Program, Consider ) Program Refinements, and Establish Annual ) Rulemaking
More informationNEWFOUNDLAND BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES DATA RESPONSES TO THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE. Provide a copy of the report to the Board concerning Newfoundland
NEWFOUNDLAND BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES DATA RESPONSES TO THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE CA181 Provide a copy of the report to the Board concerning Newfoundland Power Company s Study of Innovative Approaches to
More informationThe Economic Challenge of Reduced Water Consumption
The Economic Challenge of Reduced Water Consumption Summary EurEau members support the objective to increase resource efficiency, in particular for water and energy use. Decreasing water consumption has
More informationCalifornia s Strategy for Achieving Energy Efficiency and Demand Response
California s Strategy for Achieving Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Dian M. Grueneich, Commissioner California Public Utilities Commission EPRI Summer Seminar Energy Action Plan CPUC, CEC and the
More informationTasNetworks Pricing Strategy. Pricing Reform Working Group meeting and interested parties 20 July 2018
TasNetworks Pricing Strategy Pricing Reform Working Group meeting and interested parties 20 July 2018 Agenda Introduction Where we are proposing to go Consumer engagement spectrum inform and engage/consult
More informationPAUL A. CENTOLELLA Vice President
PAUL A. CENTOLELLA Vice President Phone: (617) 425-8182 111 Huntington Avenue Mobile: (614) 530-3017 10 th Floor pcentolella@analyisgroup.com Boston, MA 02199 Mr. Centolella is an expert on energy economics,
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COMMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U39E) for Approval of Demand Response Programs, Pilots and Budgets for Program Years 2018-2022.
More information20 Nov IEEE Chapters Seminar Grid Energy Storage: Policies. John Martin, AESO
By John Martin, P. Eng., Senior Tariff and Special Projects Advisor Alberta Electric System Operator Alberta established the regulatory framework for its electric system when generators and loads were
More informationSales: Issues for the Solar Industry
Decoupling Utility Profits From Sales: Issues for the Solar Industry Presentation to Solar Electric Power Association March 27, 2008 Presented by Wayne Shirley The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State
More informationBEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION WEST PENN POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Thomas J.
West Penn Statement No. BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION WEST PENN POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. R-0- Direct Testimony of Thomas J. Dolezal List of Topics Addressed Cost of Service Studies
More informationRate Design & Decoupling Recent Experience in Wisconsin, U.S.A.
Rate Design & Decoupling Recent Experience in Wisconsin, U.S.A. Eric Callisto, Commissioner Public Service Commission of Wisconsin September 11, 2012 ERC/NARUC Conference Amman, Jordan Goals of Presentation
More informationPOWERNET LIMITED LINE PRICING METHODOLOGY
POWERNET LIMITED LINE PRICING METHODOLOGY FOR THE ELECTRICITY INVERCARGILL LIMITED NETWORK AS AT 1 APRIL 2018 THE ELECTRICITY INVERCARGILL LIMITED NETWORK AS AT 1 APRIL 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. GLOSSARY
More informationSENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY
SENATE BUDGET AND APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO SENATE, No. 2314 STATE OF NEW JERSEY DATED: APRIL 5, 2018 The Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee reports favorably Senate Bill No. 2314.
More informationA Principled Approach to Rate Design
30 JANUARY 2018 A Principled Approach to Rate Design Colorado Public Utilities Commission Commissioners Information Meeting Docket 17M-0204E John Shenot Senior Associate The Regulatory Assistance Project
More informationStakeholder Process: Commitment Cost Bidding Improvements. Summary of Submitted Comments
Stakeholder Process: Commitment Cost Bidding Improvements Attachment A Summary of Submitted Comments Two stakeholder initiatives are consolidated into one memo as both propose market improvements to ISO
More informationReview TAC Structure Revised Straw Proposal Stakeholder Meeting
Review TAC Structure Revised Straw Proposal Stakeholder Meeting April 11, 2018 Chris Devon, Market and Infrastructure Policy Agenda Time (PDT) Topic Presenter 10:00 10:10 am Welcome and introduction James
More information