Advances in Civil and Environmental Engineering
|
|
- Job Hutchinson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ACEE Volume 02(1), Advances in Civil and Environmental Engineering ISSN copyright Jacee.us official website. SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF X-BRACED FRAMES WITH SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS M. Mahmoudi *, A. Havaran Department of Civil Engineering, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran. * Corresponding author, Tel: +98 (212) , Fax: +98 (212) m.mahmoudi@srttu.edu Abstract Shape memory alloys (SMA) are novel materials that have high elastic strain, so they can be used as materials to improve the seismic performance of structures. The purpose of this paper is to compare seismic behavior of ordinary X-braced frames (XO), with SMA X-braced one, called (XS). As the current paper takes into account the effect of SMA on the ordinary X-braced frames response modification factor, several frames with similar dimensions but various heights are designed based on the Iranian code of practice. For this purpose, initially, SMA material has been used at the end of the X-braces and subsequently the seismic behavior of two kind of bracing are evaluated and their response modification factor are compared based on non-linear incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). The response modification factor for (XO) and (XS) frames have been obtained 10 and 11.7, respectively. The results reveal that the use of SMA as a part of X-braced frames can reduce frames' residual displacement significantly. Keywords: X-braced frame, Shape Memory Alloy (SMA), SMA X-braced, Increment Dynamic Analysis (IDA), Response modification factor (R). 1. Introduction The earthquake is a phenomenon that releases high amount of energy in a short time through the earth. In the early of twentieth century, structural engineers became conscious of potential hazard induced by strong earthquakes. Structures designed to resist moderate and frequently occurring earthquakes must have sufficient stiffness and strength to control deflection and prevent any possible collapse (Maheri and Akbari, 2003), With regard to the lateral load resistance in steel frames, the
2 moment resisting frame (MRF) and the concentrically braced frame (CBF) were the two common frames applied. Although MRF possesses fine ductility owing to flexural yielding beam elements yet it suffers from limited stiffness, due to buckling of the diagonal brace (Mofid and Lotfollahi, 2006). On the other hand, CBF benefits from acceptable stiffness yet it suffers from inadequate ductility due to buckling of the diagonal brace (Asgarian and Moradi, 2011). Since the inelastic behavior of X-braced frames subjected to lateral loads is forcefully dependent on the behavior of bracing members, to eliminate this deficiency, concept of SMA can apply to the connection of braces to beam-column to improve their behavior. The current paper is an attempt to apply energy adsorbent SMA materials into the ordinary X-braced frames in order to increasing their seismic behavior such as response modification factors, ductility factors, decreasing permanent displacement and inter-story drift of the structure compared to ordinary braced frames (Asgarian and Moradi, 2011). To this purpose twenty frames, designed according to Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of building and AISC89 (AISC, 1989), with and without SMA materials. Subsequently, their seismic performances have been evaluated through non-linear Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) and linear dynamic analysis. Small parts of the structure like active links, it does not affect the total cost of the structures to a great extent. 2. Shape Memory Alloys concept Buehler and Wiley developed a series of nickel-titanium alloys in the 1960s with a composition of 53 to 57% nickel by weight that showed an unusual effect: severely deformed specimens of the alloys, with residual strain of 8-15%, regained their original shape after a thermal cycle. This effect became known as the shape-memory effect and the alloys exhibiting it were named shape-memory alloys (SMAs). It was later found that at sufficiently high temperatures such materials also possess the property of super elasticity, that is, the ability of recovering large deformations during mechanical loading-unloading cycles performed at constant temperature (Fugazza, 2003). SMAs have no lifetime limits such as problem of maintenance or substitution, even after several strong earthquakes. Recentering capability, high fatigue resistance, and the recovery of strains are among the characteristics that have made SMAs an effective material for seismic applications (Dolce et al., 2003; Dolce and Cardone, 2001; Des Roches et al., 2004). SMAs have two crystal structures. The predominant crystal structure or phase in a polycrystalline metal depends on both temperature and external stress. The high temperature phase is called austenite, whiles the low temperature phase is called martensite (Song et 2
3 al., 2006; Janke et al., 2006). The specific macroscopic behavior of SMA is closely linked to transformations between the two phases. The shape memory effect (SME) and superelastic effect (SE) are known as two unique properties of SMAs. At relatively high temperatures a SMA is in its austenitic state. It undergoes a transformation to its martensitic state when cooled. The austenite phase is characterized by a cubic crystal structure, while the martensite phase has a monoclinic (orthorombic) crystal structure (Fugazza, 2003). The former property is the capacity to regain the original shape by heating and the latter is related to the ability of recovering large deformations after remove the external load (Fugazza, 2005). In the stress-free state, SMA is defined in four transformation temperatures: M s and Mf during cooling and A s and A f during heating. The former two (with M s > M f ) indicate the temperatures at which the transformation from the austenite (also named as parent phase) into martensite respectively starts and finishes, while the latter two (with A s < A f ) are the temperatures at which the inverse transformation (also named as reverse phase) starts and finishes (Fugazza, 2003). When a unidirectional stress is applied to an austenitic specimen (Figure. 1), at a temperature less than M f, austenite transforms into martensite, upon unloading, a large residual strain remains. However, by heating above A f, martensite transforms into austenite and the specimen recovers its initial undeformed shape (Fugazza, 2003). When the material re-transforms into twinned martensite. This phenomenon is generally named as shape-memory effect. Figure. 1 Shape-memory effect (AISC, 1989). When a unidirectional stress is applied to an austenitic specimen Figure. 2, at a temperature greater than A f, there is a critical value whereupon a transformation from austenite to martensite occurs. 3
4 Figure. 2 Superelastic effect (AISC, 1989). As deformation proceeds in isothermal conditions, the stress remains almost constant until the material is fully transformed (Fugazza, 2003). Further straining causes the elastic loading of the martensite. Upon unloading, since martensite is unstable without stress at temperature greater than A f, a reverse transformation takes place, but at a lower stress level than during loading so that a hysteretic effect is produced. If the material temperature is greater than A f, the strain attained during loading is completely and spontaneously recovered at the end of unloading. This remarkable process gives rise to an energy absorption capacity with zero residual strain, which is termed super elasticity (or pseudo elasticity). If the material temperature is less than A f, only a part of stress-induced martensite retransforms into austenite. A residual strain is then found at the end of unloading, which can be recovered by heating above A f. This phenomenon is generally referred to as partial super elasticity (Fugazza, 2003). Up to now many applications have been proved for SMA materials due to their unique properties and many experimental and numerical studies have been done for their seismic performances. A number of the past studies have presented a review of the SMA properties and the applications of SMA technology in civil engineering (Song et al., 2006, Fugazza, 2005). However, more experimental and numerical studies are needed to find out a suitable performance of SMA devices and to develop seismic design criterion for these new materials. 3. Models of frames Figure. 3, presents the Geometry of the Ordinary X-bracing 3-story frame. In the present study, the framing system has been taken equal to 5m length and 3m height. The number of frame stories are chosen at five levels i.e. 3-story, 5-story, 7- story, 10- story and 12-story level. In this article two types 4
5 of X-braced frames have been exploited: The ordinary X-braced frames called "XO" and X- braced frames with SMA bracing systems called "XS". In cases XS, The braces are replaced with superelastic SMA segments connected to the frame. Figure. 4, shows the detail of the XS-frame. Figure. 3 Geometry of the 3-story frame. (a) Plan of the structures. (b) Brace configurations Figure. 4 Configuration of XS-frame cases. 4. Loading and design The gravity loads include dead and live loads of 600kg/m2 and 200kg/m2 respectively. Eq. 1 calculates the equivalent static lateral seismic loads assuming that the response modification factor R for the knee-bracing system is 7. ABI V CW C (1) R Where V represents the base shear, A is the design base acceleration ratio (for very high seismic zone=0.35g), B is response factor of building (depending on the fundamental period T), and I the importance factor of building (depending on its performance, taken equal to 1.0 in this paper), And A B called the design spectral acceleration (Figure. 5) (BHRC, 2005; Naeemi and Bozorg, 2009). All of the frames are designed according to the AISC89 allowable stress design (AISC, 1989). Table 1 summarizes the size of members in frames. As observed, the buildings contain H-shaped columns, I- shaped beams, and box braces. The columns, beams and braces were made of st37. The beam column joints were assumed to be pinned at both ends, in this way, the earthquake lateral forces are carried 5
6 only by the vertical braces system; however the gravity loads are sustained mainly by the beams and columns (Asgarian and Shokrgozar, 2009). Figure. 5 Variation of spectral acceleration with period of structure. 5. Modeling and design of superelastic SMA braces In this article, for presenting the superelastic behavior of the SMA braces a constitutive model proposed by Fugazza (Fugazza, 2003) was chosen. Figure. 6 shows the necessary parameters to construct the model. These parameters include the austenite to martensite starting stress ( AS s ), the SA austenite to martensite finishing stress ( ), the martensite to austenite starting stress ( ), the AS f SMA austenite finishing stress ( ), modulus of elasticity for austenite and martensite phases ( E ) and SA f the superelastic plateau strain length ( L ). The necessary material parameters obtained from typical uniaxial cyclic tests on wires carried out by (Des Roches et al., 2004). Table 2 provides the mechanical properties of the superelastic SMA braces. s Figure. 6 Superelastic stress-strain relationship of SMA member needed for the model (Fugazza, D., 2003) More details of the model s formulation and the integration technique can be found in the work by (Fugazza 2003). In present study for designing cross section and length of the SMA braces, they should be determined in such a way that two frame cases XO and XS be comparable. For this reason, 6
7 superelastic SMA braces were designed to provide the same allowable strength, (F y in AISC89) and the same axial stiffness (K) as XO-braces. So, the XO- frames and XS-frames will have the same natural period (note that, the mass of the corresponding XO-frames and XS-frames were assumed equal), the following relations were achieved according to these considerations. For verifying the numerical simulation of SMA with experimental data Figure. 7 shows the comparison of the responses of the Numerical superelastic model with experimental data under cyclic axial load pattern (Figure. 8) (Ikeda et al., 2004; Mishra, 2006) respectively. A SMA F f A (2) steel Alowable steel y y AS AS s s L SMA SMA SMA SMA SMA E A E A L steel steel K 26 e A steel (3) Cross section area, SMA A and element length of superelastic SMA braces can be calculated through these equations. It was also assumed that the SMA elements are made of a number of large diameter superelastic bars able to undergo compressive loads without buckling. Figure. 7 Stress-strain hysteresis loops for experimental (Mishra SK., 2006) and Numerical data subjected to the axial load pattern shown in Figure. 8. Figure. 8 Axial load pattern applied the Numerical superelastic model and experimental data (Mishra SK., 2006). 7
8 6. Definition of response modification factor Elastic analysis of structures under earthquake could create base shear force and stress which are noticeably larger than real structural response. The structure is capable of absorbing a lot of earthquake energy and resisting when it enters the inelastic range of deformation (Naeemi and Bozorg, 2009). In forced-based seismic design procedures, the response modification factor (FEMA, 1997) is utilized to reduce the linear elastic response spectra from the inelastic response spectra. In other words, response modification factor is the ratio of the strength required to maintain elastic to inelastic design strength of the structure. The behavior factor, R (shown in Eq. 4), accounts for the inherent ductility and overstrength of a structure as well as the difference in the level of stresses considered in its design (UBC, 1997). As shown in Fig. 9, the real nonlinear behavior is usually idealized by a bilinear elastoperfectly plastic relation (Uang, 1991). Figure. 9 General structure response (Uang, 1991). Yield force and yield displacement of the structure are represented by V y and Δ y, respectively. In this figure V e (V max ) correspond to the elastic response strength of the structure. The maximum base shear in an elasto-perfectly behavior is V y. It is generally expressed in the following form taking into account the above three components (Miri et al., 2009). R R.R.Y (4) s where R represents ductility-dependent component also known as ductility reduction factor, R s the overstrength factor, and Y the allowable stress factor (Miri et al., 2009). The ratio of maximum base shear considering elastic behavior V e to maximum base shear in elasto perfectly behavior V y demonstrated in Eq. 5 is called ductility reduction factor. R V V e y (5) 8
9 The overstrength factor shown in Eq. 6 is defined as the ratio of maximum base shear in actual behavior V y to first significant yield strength in structure V d. R V y s (6) Vs The overstrength factor demonstrated in Eq. 6 is based on the use of nominal material and other factors. Representing this overstrength factor by R so, the actual overstrength factor R s which can be utilized to formulate R should take into account the beneficial contribution of some other effects: Rs RS0FF F n. (7) In this equation, F 1 accounts for the difference between actual static yield strength and nominal static yield strength. For structural steel, a statistical study shows that the value of F 1 may be taken as 1.05 (Uang, 1991). Parameter F 2 might be applied to consider the augmentation in the yield stress as a result of strain rate effect during an earthquake excitation. A value of 1.1, a 10% increase to account for the strain rate effect, could be used. In this article the steel type st37 was used for all structural members. Parameters F 1 and F 2 equal to 1.05 and 1.1 were considered taking into as material overstrength factor. Other parameters can also be included when reliable data is available. These are included to the parameters such as nonstructural component contributions, variation of lateral force profile. To design for allowable stress method, the design codes decrease design loads from V s to V w. This decrease is done in Eq. 8. Y V s (8) V w This paper utilizes the design base shear V w, instead of V s. So the allowable stress factor Y becomes unity and the overstrength factor is defined as: R V y s (9) Vw 7. Modeling the structure in OpenSees software The computational model of the structures was developed using the modeling capabilities of the software framework of OpenSees (Mazzoni et al., 2007). This software is finite element software which has been specifically designed in performance systems of soil and structure under earthquake. For modeling of the members in nonlinear range of deformation, following assumptions were made. For the dynamic analysis, story masses were placed in the story levels considering rigid diaphragms action. For the modeling of braces, nonlinear beam and columns element with the materials behavior of Steel01 were exploited. Figure. 10 demonstrates the idealized elasto-plastic behavior of steel material. 9
10 Compressive and tensional yield stresses were taken equal to steel yield. The used section for each member is the uniaxial section. The strain hardening of 2% was assumed for the member behavior in inelastic range of deformation (Figure. 10). For linear and non-linear dynamic analysis a damping coefficient of 5% was assumed. For prediction of linear and nonlinear buckling of columns, both element usual stiffness matrix and element geometric stiffness matrix were considered. An initial mid span imperfection of 1/1000 for all braces was considered to predict linear buckling. An Uniaxial section and nonlinear Beam Column element was considered for plastification of element over the cross section and member length for linear and nonlinear buckling prediction. For considering geometric nonlinearities, the simplified P- stiffness matrix is considered. Figure. 10 Steel 01 Material for nonlinear elements (FEMA, 2000). To verify the results, some numerical analyses were carried out by another software (SAP2000 software) and subsequently the results obtained from the two modeling were compared. Roof displacements of the frames were utilized to compare the results. The results give weight to the accuracy of the modeling. It implies that the roof displacements obtained are approximately the same in both modeling. For example, Figure. 11 shows the time history of chichi ground motion for the top floor displacement of XO and XS 3-story frames. 01 Figure. 11 Time history of top floor displacement of KO and KE frames (3-story frames subjected to chichi ground motion).
11 8. Determination of response modification factor In this article, two factors R s and R μ have been calculated as follows: 8.1. Overstrength factor (Rs) To calculate V y, the Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of the models subjected to strong ground motions was carried out. In these analysis the records of Tabas, Northridge and Chichi earthquake (Table 3) were used. These records were selected based on the Iranian Standard Code No. 2800s criteria. The response spectra and the design spectrum are shown in Fig 5. Nonlinear dynamic response of frames is evaluated for a set of predefined ground motions that are systematically scaled to increasing intensities until one of following failure criteria is established. The maximum nonlinear base shear of this time history is the inelastic base shear of structure (Mwafy, 2002). Finally the material overstrength factor of was considered for actual overstrength factor. The failure criteria are defined by following two levels: (i) The relative floor displacement: The maximum limitation of the relative story displacement was selected based on the Iranian Standard Code No. 2800: (a) For frames with the fundamental period less than 0.7 sec: M < 0.025H (10) (b) For frames with the fundamental period more than 0.7 sec: M < 0.02H. (11) In which H is the story height. (ii) Reaching the life safety structural performance: Generally, the component behavior induced by nonlinear load-deformation relations is defined by a series of straight line segments suggested by FEMA-273, Figure. 12. The nonlinear dynamic analysis was stopped and the last scaled earthquake base shear will be selected as the one reaching to life safety structural performance level as well as the nonlinear behavior of elements as suggested by FEMA
12 Figure. 12 Generalized force-deformation relation for steel elements (FEMA 1997) Rμ Calculation To calculate Rμ, linear and nonlinear dynamic analyses were carried out. The nonlinear base shear Vy was calculated utilizing incremental nonlinear dynamic analysis as well as trials on of earthquake time histories as aforementioned. Subsequently, the maximum linear base shear Ve was computed through linear dynamic analysis of the structure under the same time history; and ultimately the ductility reduction factor was evaluated. 9. Results The time history of Northridge ground motion for the top floor displacement of XO and XS 3-story frames is showed in Figure. 13. The ground acceleration () is scaled to 0.35g, based on Standard No The peak roof displacements for the XO and XS braced frame are approximately 33 mm and 35 mm, respectively, But by the comparison of the values of residual roof displacement in Figure. 13, the use of SMA braces results in approximately no residual roof displacement, while the XO braced frame have 3.9 mm of residual displacement. 02 Figure. 13 Time history of top floor displacement of ordinary and SMA 3-story frames subjected to Northridge ground motion
13 Besides, Figures show the values of residual roof displacement for the considered frames and the three aforementioned ground motion records. The Permanent roof displacement for the XS frames is less than that for XO frames. This result specifies the advantage of use of SMA braces in reducing the residual displacement of the top floor. As well as the residual roof displacement, the maximum inter-story drift, can be considered to study the seismic performance of structures subjecting to dynamic loads Figure. 17 and 18 show the comparison of nonlinear dynamic analysis for 3, 5, 7, 10 and 12 story of XO with XE frames in term of the maximum inter-story drift subjected to scaled ground acceleration (). The result indicated that the average value of maximum inter-story drift is smaller for the buildings taller up to 16%. In the Table 4 the ultimate base shear Vy and maximum acceleration from nonlinear dynamic analysis under Tabas, Northridge and Chichi events for XO and XS frames are shown. Figure. 14 Permanent roof displacement for the XO and XS frames subjected to Tabas ground motion. Figure. 15 Permanent roof displacement for the XO and XS frames subjected to Northridge ground motion. 03
14 Figure. 16 Permanent roof displacement for the XO and XS frames subjected to Chichi ground motion. Figure. 17 Maximum inter-story drift for the XO and XS braced frames subjected to scaled ground motions ((a) Tabas, (b) Northridge, and (c) Chichi). Table 5, provides maximum elastic base shear, Ve, resulted from linear dynamic analysis under above-mentioned time histories. In the Table 6, overstrength factor, ductility factor and response modification factor of XO and XS Specimens are shown. It can be observed that the overstrength factors, ductility factors and response modification factors in XS frames are greater than XO frames. In the other hand these parameters increase as the height of building decrease. Response modification factor for different Specimens was calculated statistically as follow: 1. For XO bracing system R=10, Rµ = For XS bracing system R=11.7, Rµ =
15 Figure. 18 Average of the maximum inter-story drift for the XO and XS braced frames subjected to scaled ground motions. Figure. 19 Number of story- overstrength factor. Figure. 20 Number of story- ductility factor. Figure. 21 Number of story- response modification factor. The Comparison of overstrength, ductility factor and response modification factors for difference type of bracing are shown in Figures It can be seen that ductility factor of XS specimens is greater than ductility factor of XO specimens in all frames and this parameter decreases as the number of story increases. Although overstrength factor of frames don t change significantly in 7, 10 and 12 story frames but this parameter decreases in 3 and 5 story frames up to 41%. Ductility factor and overstrength factor gradually stables in the high story. For all type of bracing the response modification factor decreases as the height of building increases (Figure. 21). 05
16 (MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (MPa) M. Mahmoudi et al. Journal of Advances in Civil and Environmental Engineering, Volume 02(1), Conclusion In this article, Shape Memory Alloy material (SMA) was used as a part of X-braced frames. The result of the study is best summarized as follows: 1. Use of SMA as a part of X-braced frames, can decrease the residual displacement significantly. 2. With comparison of results, the response modification factors increase 17% in XS specimens. 3. The obtained overstrength factor for XO and XS specimens are, 6.96 and 6 respectively. 4. Response modification factor for XO and XS specimens are suggested as, 10 and 11.7 respectively. Table. 1 The member sizes for specimens. Number of Story Beam Mid Column Side Column Diagonal elements Similar Story Dimensions Similar Story Dimensions Similar Story Dimensions Similar Story Dimensions 1,2,3 IPE270 1 IPB180 1,2,3 IPB100 1 Box100x100x ,3 IPB Box90x90x Box80x80x10 1,2,3,4,5 IPE270 1 IPB240 1,2 IPB120 1 Box120x120x IPB220 3,4,5 IPB100 2,3,4 Box100x100x IPB Box80x80x ,5 IPB All stories IPE270 1 IPB320 1,2,3,4 IPB140 1,2,3,4 Box120x120x ,3 IPB260 5,6,7 IPB100 5 Box100x100x ,5,6,7 IPB Box90x90x Box80x80x10 All stories IPE270 1 IPB500 1,2 IPB160 1 Box120x120x IPB450 3,4,5,6 IPB140 2 Box120x120x IPB360 7,8,9,10 IPB120 3,4,5,6 Box120x120x ,5 IPB ,8 Box100x100x ,7,8 IPB Box90x90x ,10 IPB Box80x80x10 All stories IPE270 1 IPB650 1 IPB180 1 Box120x120x IPB550 2,3,4 IPB160 2,3 Box120x120x ,4,5,6 IPB450 5,6,7 IPB140 4,5,6,7,8 Box120x120x ,8 IPB280 8,9,10,11,12 IPB120 9,10 Box100x100x ,10 IPB Box90x90x ,12 IPB Box80x80x10 Table. 2 Mechanical properties of SMA (Fugazza, D., 2003). Quantity E SMA AS s AS f SA s SA f L )%( Value
17 Table. 3 Ground motion data. Record Date Station Data Source Site conditions Distance (Km) Magnitude Chi-Chi, Taiwan 20/09/1999 TCU095 CWB USGS (B) M ( 7.6 ) Northridge 17/1/1994 Santa Monica City Hall CDMG USGS (B) 27.6 M ( 6.7 ) Tabas 16/09/1978 Dayhook - CWB (B) 17.0 M ( 7.4 ) Duration (Sec) Table. 4 Nonlinear maximum Base Shear and for XO and XS under Tabas, Northridge and Chichi ground motion. No. Story XO XS Tabas Northridge chichi AVG Tabas Northridge chichi AVG V y V y V y V y V y V y V y V y Table. 5 linear maximum Base Shear and for XO and XS under Tabas, Northridge and Chichi ground motion. No. Story XO XS Tabas Northridge chichi AVG Tabas Northridge chichi AVG V e V e V e V e V e V e V e V e Table. 6 Minimum Overstrength factors, Ductility factors and Response modification factors of XO and XS. No. Story Rs Rµ R XO XS XO XS XO XS References American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), Manual of Steel Construction, Chicago. Asgarian, B. and Moradi, S., Seismic response of steel braced frames with shape memory alloy braces, Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 67, Asgarian, B. and Shokrgozar, H.R., BRBF response modification factor, Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 65,
18 BHRC., Iranian code of practice for seismic resistance design of buildings: Standard no (3rd edition) Building and Housing Research Center. Des Roches, R. McCormick, J. and Delemont, M., Cyclic properties of superelastic shape memory alloy wires and bars, Journal of the Structural Engineering. 130, Dolce, M. Cardone, D. and Marnetto, R., Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shapememory alloys, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 29, Dolce, M. and Cardone, D., Mechanical behavior of shape memory alloys for seismic applications, 2: austenite NiTi wires subjected to tension, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 43, Federal Emergency Management Agency, NEHRP provisions for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Rep FEMA 273 and 274, Washington DC. Federal Emergency Management Agency, NEHRP provisions for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Rep FEMA- 356, Washington DC. Fugazza, D., Shape memory alloy devices in earthquake engineering: mechanical properties, constitutive modeling and numerical simulations, Master s thesis. Pavia (Italy): European school for advanced studies in reduction of seismic risk. Fugazza, D., Use of Shape-Memory Alloy Devices in EarthquakeEngineering: Mechanical Properties, Advanced Constitutive Modelling and Structural Applications, Doctor of Philosophy Degree in EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING s thesis, Pavia (Italy): European school for advanced studies in reduction of seismic risk, 1-2. Ikeda, T. Nae, FA. and Naito, H., Constitutive model of shape memory alloys for unidirectional loading considering inner hysteresis loops, Smart Materials and Structures. 13, International Conference of Building Officials, Uniform Building Code, Whittier, California. Janke, L. Czaderski, C. and Motavalli, J. Ruth, M., Applications of shape memory alloys in civil engineering structures overview, limits and new ideas, Materials and Structures. 38, Maheri, M.R. and Akbari, R., Seismic behaviour factor, R, for steel X-braced and knee-braced RC buildings, Engineering Structures. 25, Mazzoni,S. and McKenna, F., OpenSees command language manual, version Pacific earthquake engineering research center. Mishra, SK., Modeling shape memory alloys with applications to seismic design of structural systems, M.Sc. dissertation, Department of civil, structural and environmental engineering state university of New York at Buffalo. Miri, M. Zare, A. and Abbas zadeh, H., Seismic behavior of steel frames investigation with knee brace based on pushover analysis, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 50, Mofid, M. and Lotfollahi, M., On the characteristics of new ductile knee bracing systems, Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 62, Mwafy, AM. and Elnashai, AS., Calibration of force reduction factors of RC buildings, Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 22, Naeemi, M. and Bozorg, M, Seismic Performance of Knee Braced Frame, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 50,
19 Song,G. and Li HN, Ma N., Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures, Engineering Structures. 28, Uang, CM., Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd factor for building seismic provision, Journal of Structure Engineering. 117,
Response Modification Factor of Dual Moment-resistant Frame with Buckling Restrained Brace (BRB)
Response Modification Factor of Dual Moment-resistant Frame with Buckling Restrained Brace (BRB) Gh. Abdollahzadeh Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Babol Noshirvani Technology University,
More informationTitle. Author(s)ARDESHIR DEYLAMI; MOSTAFA FEGHHI. Issue Date Doc URL. Type. Note. File Information IRREGULARITY IN HEIGHT
Title THE COMPARISON OF THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF BRBF AN IRREGULARITY IN HEIGHT Author(s)ARDESHIR DEYLAMI; MOSTAFA FEGHHI Issue Date 2013-09-12 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/54342 Type proceedings
More informationSeismic Assessment of Innovative Hybrid Bracing System Equipped with Shape Memory Alloy
Seismic Assessment of Innovative Hybrid Bracing System Equipped with Shape Memory Alloy A. Jalaeefar & B. Asgarian Civil Engineering faculty, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Iran SUMMARY: The usage
More informationSEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF STEEL PIPE SUPPORT STRUCTURES
10NCEE Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering July 21-25, 2014 Anchorage, Alaska SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF STEEL PIPE SUPPORT STRUCTURES
More informationSeismic Control Of Structures Using Shape Memory Alloys
Seismic Control Of Structures Using Shape Memory Alloys Gopika Shaji S 1, Manju P.M 2 1 ( Department of Civil Engineering, SNGCE, Kadayiruppu, India) 2 (Department of Civil Engineering, SNGCE, Kadayiruppu,
More informationEvaluation of Response Reduction Factor and Ductility Factor of RC Braced Frame
12 JOURNAL OF MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING STRUCTURES 2 (215) 12 129 Research Paper Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor and Ductility Factor of RC Braced Frame Kruti Tamboli, J. A. Amin * Department of
More informationAcademia Arena 2014;6(1) Seismic performance evaluation of steel knee-braced moment frames
Seismic performance evaluation of steel knee-braced moment frames Bahman Farokhi 1, Alireza Bazvand 2 1 Student, ph.d of civil engineering, university of malayer, iran (corresponding Author) Abstract:
More informationTHE STUDY OF THE OVER STRENGTH FACTOR OF STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALLS BY FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
THE STUDY OF THE OVER STRENGTH FACTOR OF STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALLS BY FINITE ELEMENT METHOD Mahin Abdollahzadeh 1, *Arman Kabiri 1 and Ramin Amjadi 2 1 Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University,
More informationEvaluation the Overstrength of Concentrically Steel Bracing Frame Systems Considering Members Post-buckling strength
Evaluation the Overstrength of Concentrically Steel Bracing Frame Systems Considering Members Post-buckling strength Mussa Mahmoudi 1 and Mahdi Zaree 2 1. Assistant Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering,
More informationEVALUATION OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE FACTORS FOR CHEVRON BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES
EALUATION OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE FACTORS FOR CHERON BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES M.B. Bozkurt 1, Y.O. Özkılıç 2 and C. Topkaya 3 1 Res. Assist. Dr., Civil Eng. Department, Manisa Celal Bayar University,
More informationSEISMIC ANALYSIS OF STEEL MRF WITH SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY EQUIPPED BRACES
Int. J. Chem. Sci.: 14(S1), 2016, 211-219 ISSN 0972-768X www.sadgurupublications.com SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF STEEL MRF WITH SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY EQUIPPED BRACES B. ANAGHA * and S. ELAVENIL School of Mechanical
More informationRESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016
RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016 SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF MODULAR STEEL FRAMES EQUIPPED WITH SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY BRACES Papia Sultana PhD Candidate, Western University, Canada Maged A. Youssef Professor,
More informationEffect of Standard No Rules for Moment Resisting Frames on the Elastic and Inelastic Behavior of Dual Steel Systems
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 7, No. 6, 2017, 2139-2146 2139 Effect of Standard No. 2800 Rules for Moment Resisting Frames on the Elastic and Inelastic Behavior of Dual Steel
More informationResponse Modification Factor of Coupled Steel Shear Walls
Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 46(1): 15 26, June 2013 ISSN: 2322 2093 Response Modification Factor of Coupled Steel Shear Walls Abdollahzadeh, G. 1* and Malekzadeh, H. 2 1 Assistant Professor,
More informationComparison between Seismic Behavior of Suspended Zipper Braced Frames and Various EBF Systems
Comparison between Seismic Behavior of Suspended Zipper Braced Frames and Various EBF Systems A. Niknam 1, A. Sharfaei 2 1- Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Faculty, University of Science & Technology,
More informationStudy on Response Modification Factor for Stiffened Steel Shear Wall Systems
Study on Response Modification Factor for Stiffened Steel Shear Wall Systems A. Bakhshi & J. Aslani Civil Eng. Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran Blank line 11 pt SUMMARY: Design
More informationApplication of Shape Memory Alloys in Seismic Control of Steel Structures
Advances in Materials Science and Applications Jun. 3, Vol. Iss., PP. 66-7 Application of Shape Memory Alloys in Seismic Control of Steel Structures Mehdi Ghassemieh *, Amir Kari School of Civil Engineering,
More informationAn Investigation on Bracing Configuration Effects on Behavior of Diagonally Braced Frames
An Investigation on Bracing Configuration Effects on Behavior of Diagonally Braced Frames P. Shademan Heidari, H. Kayhani, R. Ahmady Jazany ABSTRACT This study aims at evaluating the effects of different
More informationGeometric Parameters and Behavior Factor of Knee-Braced Steel Frames Using Nonlinear Static Pushover (NSP) Analyses
Modern Applied Science; Vol. 10, No. 11; 2016 ISSN 1913-1844 E-ISSN 1913-1852 Published by anadian enter of Science and Education Geometric Parameters and Behavior Factor of Knee-Braced Steel Frames Using
More informationUPGRADING THE DUCTILITY AND SEISMIC BEHAVIOR FACTOR OF ORDINARY RC FRAMES USING FIBER COMPOSITE SHEETS
CD04-001 UPGRADING THE DUCTILITY AND SEISMIC BEHAVIOR FACTOR OF ORDINARY RC FRAMES USING FIBER COMPOSITE SHEETS A. Niroomandi 1, A. Maheri 2 1 Seismic Retrofitting Center, Shiraz University, Iran 2 Faculty
More informationCOMPARISON OF LOW-RISE STEEL CHEVRON AND SUSPENDED ZIPPER BRACED FRAMES
Eighth International Conference on ADVANCES IN STEEL STRUCTURES Lisbon, Portugal, July -4, 15 COMPARISON OF LOW-RISE STEEL CHEVRON AND SUSPENDED ZIPPER BRACED FRAMES Yigit Ozcelik*, Afsin Saritas** and
More informationBehavior of Zipper Braced Frame (ZBF) compared with other Concentrically Braced Frame (CBF)
Research Article International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology ISSN 2277-4106 2013 INPRESSCO. All Rights Reserved. Available at http://inpressco.com/category/ijcet Behavior of Zipper Braced
More informationComparison of Chevron and Suspended Zipper Braced Steel Frames
9 th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, 27-30 September 2010 Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey Comparison of Chevron and Suspended Zipper Braced Steel Frames A. Y. Ozcelik
More informationSHAKE TABLE TESTS OF RC FRAME WITH SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY BRACING BARS
4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering Taipei, Taiwan October 12-13, 2006 Paper No. 90 SHAKE TABLE TESTS OF RC FRAME WITH SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY BRACING BARS Wen-I Liao 1 and Y. L. Mo 2 ABSTRACT
More informationInelastic Torsional Response of Steel Concentrically Braced Frames
Inelastic Torsional Response of Steel Concentrically Braced Frames R. Comlek, B. Akbas & O. Umut Gebze Institute of Technology, Gebze-Kocaeli, Turkey J. Shen & N. Sutchiewcharn Illinois Institute of Technology,
More informationThe Effect of Frame Geometry on the Seismic Response of Self-Centering Concentrically- Braced Frames
International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering 6 212 The Effect of Frame Geometry on the Seismic Response of Self-Centering Concentrically- Braced Frames David A. Roke and M. R. Hasan Abstract
More informationAssessment of Response Modification Factor of Open Steel Platform Structures Subjected to Seismic Loads
Assessment of Response Modification Factor of Open Steel Platform Structures Subjected to Seismic Loads Yasser S. Salem (&), Lisa Wang, and Germaine Aziz Civil Engineering Department, Cal Poly Pomona,
More informationSeismic assessment of an existing hospital
International Students Conference of Civil Engineering, ISCCE 2012, 10-11 May 2012, Epoka University, Tirana, Albania Seismic assessment of an existing hospital Egla Luca Department of Civil Engineering,
More informationEvaluation of Seismic Response Modification Factors for RCC Frames by Non Linear Analysis
Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Architecture and Civil Engineering (AARCV 2012), 21 st 2 rd June 2012 22 Evaluation of Seismic Response Modification Factors for RCC Frames by Non
More informationWire-rope Bracing System with Central Cylinder,
Wire-rope Bracing System with Central Cylinder, element Finite Element based application Based Application N. Fanaie & S. Aghajani Khajeh Nasiroddin Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran SUMMARY:
More informationNLTHA and Pushover Analysis for Steel Frames with Flag-shaped Hysteretic Braces
NLTHA and Pushover Analysis for Steel Frames with Flag-shaped Hysteretic Braces J.B. McInerney University of Cambridge, UK J.C. Wilson McMaster University, Canada SUMMARY: In this study, non-linear time
More informationApplication of Viscous Dampers in Seismic Rehabilitation of Steel Moment Resisting Frames
MATEC Web of Conferences 67, 5 (6) DOI:.5/ matecconf/6675 SMAE 6 Application of Viscous Dampers in Seismic Rehabilitation of Steel Moment Resisting Frames Mohammad Hossein Saghafi,a, Seyed Amin Eldin Movehedin,b
More informationRESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016
RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF THREE-STORY SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY REINFORCED CONCRETE WALLS Emad A. Abraik Ph.D. Candidate, Western University, Canada Maged A. Youssef Professor,
More informationPerformance-based plastic design of a high rise moment resisting frame with friction dampers
Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures X Performance-based plastic design of a high rise moment resisting frame with friction dampers C. S. Patil, V. B. Patil & S. B. Kharmale B. V. B. College of
More informationSTUDY ON RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTOR OF CONCENTRICALLY BRACED STEEL FRAMES
STUDY ON RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTOR OF CONCENTRICALLY BRACED STEEL FRAMES Chaitanya CVK 1, Pavan Kumar Ch 2, V.Venkatesh 3 1,2,3 Assistant Professor,Department of Civil Engineering, Sphoorthy Engineering
More informationSeismic Behavior of Composite Shear Wall Systems and Application of Smart Structures Technology
Steel Structures 7 (2007) 69-75 www.ijoss.org Seismic Behavior of Composite Shear Wall Systems and Application of Smart Structures Technology Qiuhong Zhao 1 and Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl 2, * 1 Assistant
More informationTHE EFFECTS OF HEIGHT AND LENGTH OF LINK BEAM ON RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTORS OF ECCENTRICALLY BRACED STEEL FRAMES
ISSN: 2345-319 CEE esearch in Civil and Environmental Engineering www.jrcee.com esearch in Civil and Environmental Engineering 213 1 (1) 41-53 THE EFFECTS OF HEIGHT AND LENGTH OF LINK BEAM ON ESPONSE MODIFICATION
More informationInelastic Deformation Demands of Non-Ductile Reinforced Concrete Frames Strengthened with Buckling-Restrained Braces
Proceedings of the Tenth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering Building an Earthquake-Resilient Pacific 6-8 November 2015, Sydney, Australia Inelastic Deformation Demands of Non-Ductile Reinforced
More informationStudy on the Seismic Performance of the Buckling- Restrained Braced Frames
Vol. 101, No. 8; August 2012, 320-330 NATIONALPARK-FORSCHUNG IN DER SCHWEIZ (Switzerland Research Park Journal) http://www.naukpub.com Study on the Seismic Performance of the Buckling- Restrained Braced
More informationSeismic Performance and Design of Linked Column Frame System (LCF)
Seismic Performance and Design of Linked Column Frame System (LCF) M. Malakoutian & J.W. Berman Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA P. Dusicka
More informationComparative Study and Seismic Analysis of a Multistorey Steel Building
IJSTE - International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering Volume 3 Issue 06 December 2016 ISSN (online): 2349-784X Comparative Study and Seismic Analysis of a Multistorey Steel Building Shubham
More informationProgressive Collapse Assessment of RC Structures under Instantaneous and Gradual Removal of Columns
Progressive Collapse Assessment of RC Structures under Instantaneous and Gradual Removal of Columns A.R. Rahai, M. Banazadeh, M.R. Seify Asghshahr & H. Kazem Department of Civil Engineering, Amirkabir
More informationSimi Aboobacker 1 and Nisha Varghese 2
Numerical Simulation of Special Concentrically Braced Frame Structure using OpenSEES Simi Aboobacker 1 and Nisha Varghese 2 PG Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Vidya Academy of Science and Technology,
More informationSeismic Evaluation of the Historic East-Memorial Building Retrofitted with Friction Dampers, Ottawa, Canada
Seismic Evaluation of the Historic East-Memorial Building Retrofitted with Friction Dampers, Ottawa, Canada S. Jabbour & D.J. Carson Parsons Brinckerhoff Halsall Inc. SUMMARY: A seismic evaluation under
More informationInitial cost and seismic vulnerability functions for buildings with energy-dissipating devices
Safety and Security Engineering 161 Initial cost and seismic vulnerability functions for buildings with energy-dissipating devices J. García-Pérez, M. Zenteno & O. Díaz Instituto de Ingeniería, Mecánica
More informationApplication of Pushover Analysis for Evaluating Seismic Performance of RC Building
Application of Pushover Analysis for Evaluating Seismic Performance of RC Building Riza Ainul Hakim* MSc Student in Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah, KSA Mohammed
More informationCOMPARISON OF PERFOMANCE OF THIN STEEL SHEAR WALLS AND CONCENTRIC BRACES BY CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD
COMPARISON OF PERFOMANCE OF THIN STEEL SHEAR WALLS AND CONCENTRIC BRACES BY CAPACITY SPECTRUM METHOD ABSTRACT : M. Ghalehnovi 1,M. Miri 2 and H.Hemati 3 1 Assistant Professor, Sistan and Baluchestan University,
More informationEvaluation of Seismic Behavior of Buckling Restrained Braced Frames as Dual System in Combination with Special Moment Resisting Frames
Evaluation of Seismic Behavior of Buckling Restrained Braced Frames as Dual System in Combination with Special Moment Resisting Frames A. Mehdipanah, S.R. Mirghaderi & S.A. Razavi Faculty of Civil Engineering,
More informationDEFLECTION AMPLIFICATION FACTORS FOR DUCTILE BRACED FRAMES
DEFLECTION AMPLIFICATION FACTORS FOR DUCTILE BRACED FRAMES Brandon K. Thompson 1 and Paul W. Richards 2 1 Graduate Student Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University,
More informationDESIGN OF FRAMES WITH BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES FEMA P695 based Evaluation of a Eurocode 8 Conforming Design Procedure
EUROSTEEL 2014, September 10-12, 2014, Naples, Italy DESIGN OF FRAMES WITH BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES FEMA P695 based Evaluation of a Eurocode 8 Conforming Design Procedure Ádám Zsarnóczay a, Tamás Balogh
More informationREHABILITATION OF RC BUILDINGS USING STRUCTURAL WALLS
REHABILITATION OF RC BUILDINGS USING STRUCTURAL WALLS Ahmed GHOBARAH 1 And Maged YOUSSEF 2 SUMMARY A developed macroscopic model is applied to the analysis of an example structure to demonstrate the use
More informationCapacity Design Procedure Evaluation for Buckling Restrained Braced Frames with Incremental Dynamic Analysis
Capacity Design Procedure Evaluation for Buckling Restrained Braced Frames with Incremental Dynamic Analysis Á. Zsarnóczay, L.G. Vigh Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary SUMMARY: The
More informationAn Investigation on the Pushover Analysis Based Methods for Compensating the P-Delta Effects
International Journal of Structural and Civil Engineering Research Vol. 7, No., ebruary 8 An Investigation on the Pushover Analysis Based Methods for Compensating the P-Delta Effects Parsa Heydarpour and
More informationSeismic Assessment of an RC Building Using Pushover Analysis
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 4, No. 3, 014, 631-635 631 Seismic Assessment of an RC Building Using Pushover Analysis Riza Ainul Hakim ainul7@yahoo.com Mohammed Sohaib Alama sohaib.alama@hotmail.com
More informationEVALUATION OF NONLINEAR STATIC PROCEDURES FOR SEISMIC DESIGN OF BUILDINGS
EVALUATION OF NONLINEAR STATIC PROCEDURES FOR SEISMIC DESIGN OF BUILDINGS By H.S. Lew 1 and Sashi K. Kunnath Presented at the rd Joint Meeting of the UJNR Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects ABSTRACT This
More informationA Comparative Study on Non-Linear Analysis of Frame with and without Structural Wall System
A Comparative Study on Non-Linear Analysis of Frame with and without Structural Wall System Dr.Binu Sukumar #1, A.Hemamathi *2, S.Kokila #3 C.Hanish #4 #1 Professor &Head, Department of Civil Engineering,
More informationEngr. Thaung Htut Aung M. Eng. Asian Institute of Technology Deputy Project Director, AIT Consulting
Engr. Thaung Htut Aung M. Eng. Asian Institute of Technology Deputy Project Director, AIT Consulting Selection of Structural systems Load paths Materials Approximate sizing of members Primary mechanisms
More informationINVESTIGATION ON NONLINEAR ANALYSIS OF EXISTING BUILDING AND INTRODUCING SEISMIC RETROFITTING OUTLINES WITH CASE STUDY
13 th World onference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.., anada August 1-6, 4 Paper No. 356 INVESTIGATION ON NONLINEAR ANALYSIS OF EXISTING BUILDING AND INTRODUING SEISMI RETROFITTING OUTLINES WITH
More informationA BASE ISOLATION DEVICE WITH BARS IN SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS
A BASE ISOLATION DEVICE WITH BARS IN SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS Fabio Casciati*, Lucia Faravelli* and Karim Hamdaoui* *University of Pavia Department of Structural Mechanics, via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia Italy
More informationSeismic Steel Design 12/9/2012
Chapter 8 Design of Seismic-Resistant Steel Building Structures: A Brief Overview SEISMIC STEEL DESIGN IN CANADA and the USA Instructor: Dr. Carlos E. Ventura, P.Eng. Department of Civil Engineering The
More informationCOMPARATIVE STUDY ON SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF SPECIAL CONCENTRIC BRACED FRAMES WITH ECCENTRIC BRACED FRAMES
This paper has not been DEST reviewed COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF SPECIAL CONCENTRIC BRACED FRAMES WITH ECCENTRIC BRACED FRAMES Mohsen Tehranizade 1, Touraj Taghikhani 2, Mahdi Kioumarsi 3,
More informationProceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Environmental and Geological Science and Engineering
Modeling of Hysteretic Damper in Three-Story Steel Frame Subjected to Earthquake Load Mohammad Saeed Masoomi 1, Siti Aminah Osman 1, and Shahed Shojaeipour 2 Department Civil and Structural Engineering
More informationExploring the Implication of Multi-plastic Hinge Design Concept of Structural Walls in Dual Systems
Exploring the Implication of Multi-plastic Hinge Design Concept of Structural Walls in Dual Systems N. Samadzadegan School of Civil Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran M. Khanmohammadi School of Civil
More informationSeismic Response of Simply Supported Deck Bridges with Auxiliary Superelastic Devices
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Engineering 14 (211) 2315 2322 The Twelfth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction Seismic Response of Simply Supported
More informationResearch Article Special Issue
Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences Research Article Special Issue ISSN 111-9867 Available online at http://www.jfas.info HYSTERESIS BEHAVIOR OF SEISMIC ISOLATORS IN EARTHQUAKES NEAR A FAULT IN
More informationEVALUATION OF RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTOR OF RC FRAMED BUILDINGS BY PUSHOVER ANALYSIS
EVALUATION OF RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTOR OF RC FRAMED BUILDINGS BY PUSHOVER ANALYSIS 1 VENKATA RAMANA R. L., 2 INGLE R. K. 1 M.Tech. Student, 2 Professor, Department of Applied Mechanics, VNIT, Nagpur,
More informationConcept improvement of behavior of X-Bracing systems by using Easy-Going Steel
Concept improvement of behavior of X-Bracing systems by using Easy-Going Steel S. Sabouri-Ghomi 1 and P. Ebadi 2 1 Associate Prof., Dept. of Structural Engineering, haje Nasir Toosi University of Technology,
More informationNonlinear Pushover Analysis of Steel Frame Structure Dahal, Purna P., Graduate Student Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Steel Frame Structure Dahal, Purna P., Graduate Student Southern Illinois University, Carbondale Abstract: The applicability of the SAP2000 software for the nonlinear pushover
More informationALUMINIUM SHEAR-LINK FOR SEISMIC ENERGY DISSIPATION
ALUMINIUM SHEAR-LINK FOR SEISMIC ENERGY DISSIPATION Durgesh C RAI 1 And Benjamin J WALLACE SUMMARY An aluminium shear-link is developed for earthquake resistant structures. It is just an I-shaped beam
More informationSeismic Behavior of Zipper Braced Frames; A Review
2013, TextRoad Publication ISSN 2090-4304 Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research www.textroad.com Seismic Behavior of Zipper Braced Frames; A Review Nasim Irani Sarand 1*, Abdolrahim Jalali 2,
More informationPRELIMANARY INVESTIGATION OF SMA-BASED RECENTERING BEAM- COLUMN CONNECTION
PRELIMANARY INVESTIGATION OF SMA-BASED RECENTERING BEAM- COLUMN CONNECTION M.S. Speicher 1, R. DesRoches 2, and R.T. Leon 3 1 Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute
More informationA Comparison of Basic Pushover Methods
International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES) ISSN (Online) 2319-183X, (Print) 2319-1821 Volume 2, Issue 5(May 2013), PP. 14-19 A Comparison of Basic Pushover Methods N.K. Manjula 1,
More informationLIGHTLY DAMPED MOMENT RESISTING STEEL FRAMES
ABSTRACT : LIGHTLY DAMPED MOMENT RESISTING STEEL FRAMES Ozgur Atlayan and Finley A. Charney Graduate Student, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 46, USA Email:
More informationDuctility and Ultimate Strength of Eccentric Braced Frame
2011 International Conference on Advanced Materials Engineering IPCSIT vol.15 (2011) (2011) IACSIT Press, Singapore Ductility and Ultimate Strength of Eccentric Braced Frame Seyed Hamid Hashemi + Assistant
More informationConcept of Earthquake Resistant Design
Concept of Earthquake Resistant Design Sudhir K Jain Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar November 2012 1 Bhuj Earthquake of 2001 Magnitude 7.7, ~13,805 persons dead Peak ground acceleration ~0.60g
More informationHYBRID MOMENT RESISTING STEEL FRAMES
HYBRID MOMENT RESISTING STEEL FRAMES Finley A. Charney 1 and Ozgur Atlayan 2 1 Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 2461, USA 2 Graduate
More informationPERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS OF R.C.C. FRAMES
PERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS OF R.C.C. FRAMES Mrugesh D. Shah M.E Structure student, B.V.M Engineering College Atul N. Desai Associate professor. B.V.M Engineering College Sumant B Patel Associate Professor,
More informationEFFECTS OF STRONG-MOTION DURATION ON THE RESPONSE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME BUILDINGS ABSTRACT
Proceedings of the 9th U.S. National and 1th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering Compte Rendu de la 9ième Conférence Nationale Américaine et 1ième Conférence Canadienne de Génie Parasismique
More informationSeismic design of braced frame gusset plate connections
Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures V 105 Seismic design of braced frame gusset plate connections C. W. Roeder, D. E. Lehman, A. Christopolus, I. Gunnarson, S. Johnson & J. H. Yoo Department of
More informationPERFORMANCE-BASED PLASTIC DESIGN AND ENERGY-BASED EVALUATION OF SEISMIC RESISTANT RC MOMENT FRAME
Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol., No., pp. - () PERFORMANCE-BASED PLASTIC DESIGN AND ENERGY-BASED EVALUATION OF SEISMIC RESISTANT RC MOMENT FRAME Wen-Cheng Liao and Subhash C. Goel Key words:
More informationSEISMIC ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES CONSIDERING DUCTILITY EFFECTS
SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES CONSIDERING DUCTILITY EFFECTS Hima Elizabeth Koshy 1 and Remya V 2 1,2 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Mount Zion College of Engineering,
More informationDual earthquake resistant frames
Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures VII 165 Dual earthquake resistant frames T. L. Sophocleous & M. C. Phocas Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Cyprus, Cyprus Abstract
More informationNON-LINEAR STATIC PUSHOVER ANALYSIS FOR MULTI-STORED BUILDING BY USING ETABS
NON-LINEAR STATIC PUSHOVER ANALYSIS FOR MULTI-STORED BUILDING BY USING ETABS Polupalli Victor Paul 1, K Sampath Kumar 2 1 PG Student, Dept of Civil Engineering, Nova College of Engineering & Technology,
More informationANALYSIS OF HYSTERESIS BEHAVIOR OF EXTENDED END-PLATE CONNECTIONS WITH SUPERELASTIC SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY BOLTS
ANALYSIS OF HYSTERESIS BEHAVIOR OF EXTENDED END-PLATE CONNECTIONS WITH SUPERELASTIC SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY BOLTS Aleena Charly 1, Anseena Basheer 2 1P.G.Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Cochin Institute
More informationDISPLACEMENT-BASED SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING NON- DUCTILE STEEL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 757 DISPLACEMENT-BASED SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING NON- DUCTILE STEEL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES
More informationNonlinear Behavior and Dissipated Energy of Knee Braced Frames Based on Cyclic Analysis
International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Development Issue 3, Vol.5 (September 213) Nonlinear Behavior and Dissipated Energy of Knee Braced Frames Based on Cyclic Analysis Sed-Y. Jamalvandi
More informationEgyptian Code Seismic Load Design Provisions for Moment Resisting Frames
Egyptian Code Seismic Load Design Provisions for Moment Resisting Frames Ahmed Hossameldin Hanafy 1, Mohammed Darwish 1,2(&), and Moustafa Baraka 1 1 German University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt mdarwish@aucegypt.edu
More informationInternational Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development. Assessment Of Response Reduction Factor For Asymmetric RC Frame Building
Scientific Journal of Impact Factor(SJIF): 3.13 e-issn(o): 238-7 p-issn(p): 238-66 International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development Volume 2,Issue 6, June -215 Assessment Of Response
More informationVERIFICATION OF A REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMN COMPUTER MODEL UNDER UNIAXIAL AND BIAXIAL BENDING LOADING CONDITIONS
Konferensi Nasional Teknik Sipil 4 (KoNTekS 4) Sanur-Bali, 2-3 Juni 2010 VERIFICATION OF A REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMN COMPUTER MODEL UNDER UNIAXIAL AND BIAXIAL BENDING LOADING CONDITIONS Jimmy Chandra
More informationSEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF MULTISTOREY STEEL FRAMES WITH STRAIN HARDENING FRICTION DAMPERS
THE PUBLISHING HOUSE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY, Series A, OF THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY Volume 15, Number 2/2014, pp. 174 181 SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF MULTISTOREY STEEL FRAMES WITH STRAIN HARDENING FRICTION
More informationNON LINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS OF DUAL RC FRAME STRUCTURE
NON LINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS OF DUAL RC FRAME STRUCTURE Sauhardra Ojha 1,Arunendra Mishra 2 Mohd Firoj 3,Dr.K.Narayan 4 1,2,3 P.G.student of Civil Engineering department, Institute of Engineering and Technology
More informationctbuh.org/papers CTBUH Recommendations for the Seismic Design of High-Rise Buildings
ctbuh.org/papers Title: Author: Subject: CTBUH Recommendations for the Seismic Design of High-Rise Buildings Michael Willford, Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat Structural Engineering Publication
More informationFagà, Bianco, Bolognini, and Nascimbene 3rd fib International Congress
COMPARISON BETWEEN NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL CYCLIC RESPONSE OF ALTERNATIVE COLUMN TO FOUNDATION CONNECTIONS OF REINFORCED CONCRETEC PRECAST STRUCTURES Ettore Fagà, Dr, EUCENTRE, Pavia, Italy Lorenzo
More informationPerformance based Displacement Limits for Reinforced Concrete Columns under Flexure
Performance based Displacement Limits for Reinforced Concrete Columns under Flexure Ahmet Yakut, Taylan Solmaz Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Middle East Technical University, Ankara,Turkey SUMMARY:
More informationNonlinear behavior Of RBS connections in steel moment frames
icccbe 2010 Nottingham University Press Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering W Tizani (Editor) Nonlinear behavior Of RBS connections in steel moment
More informationNONLINEAR PERFORMANCE OF A TEN-STORY REINFORCED CONCRETE SPECIAL MOMENT RESISTING FRAME (SMRF)
NONLINEAR PERFORMANCE OF A TEN-STORY REINFORCED CONCRETE SPECIAL MOMENT RESISTING FRAME (SMRF) Houssam Mohammad Agha, Li Yingmin, Oday Asal Salih and A ssim Al-Jbori Doctoral Candidate, College of Civil
More informationEFFECTS OF COLUMN CAPACITY ON THE SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MID-RISE STRONG-COLUMN-WEAK-BEAM MOMENT FRAMES
EFFECTS OF COLUMN CAPACITY ON THE SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MID-RISE STRONG-COLUMN-WEAK-BEAM MOMENT FRAMES Nattapat WONGPAKDEE and Sutat LEELATAVIWAT ABSTRACT The strong-column-weak-beam (SCWB) design philosophy
More informationPerformance Based Plastic Design of Concentrically Braced Frame attuned with Indian Standard code and its Seismic Performance Evaluation
168 JOURNAL OF MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING STRUCTURES 2 (2015) 168 179 Research Paper Performance Based Plastic Design of Concentrically Braced Frame attuned with Indian Standard code and its Seismic Performance
More informationEvaluation Of Response Modification Factor For Moment Resisting Frames
Kalpa Publications in Civil Engineering Volume 1, 2017, Pages 118 123 ICRISET2017. International Conference on Research and Innovations in Science, Engineering &Technology. Selected papers in Civil Engineering
More informationA Two-Ring Energy Dissipating Device with Similar Behaviors in Tension and Compression to Create Buckling Resistant Braces
A Two-Ring Energy Dissipating Device with Similar Behaviors in Tension and Compression to Create Buckling Resistant Braces M. Hosseini International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES),
More information