Implementing a programmatic approach The REVISED FIP results framework Guido Geissler, CIF Administrative Unit

Transcription

1 Implementing a programmatic approach The REVISED FIP results framework Guido Geissler, CIF Administrative Unit

2 FIP results framework - Simplification FIP results framework approved June 11 - Impact level indicators: 8 Outcome level indicators: 11 Project/program indicators: 13 Total: 32 Living document Learning-by-doing Investment Plans Brazil Burkina Faso DR Congo Ghana Indonesia Lao PDR Mexico Peru REVISED FIP results framework October Impact level indicators: 3 Outcome level indicators: 9 Project/program indicators: 0 Total: 12 FIP pilot countries meeting/ MDB working group

3 Global - CIF Final Outcome (15-20 yrs) Forest Investment Program (FIP) Logic Model Improved low carbon, climate resilient development Country - Transformative Impact (10-15 yrs) Core objectives: Co-benefit objectives : Reduced/avoided GHG emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and enhanced forest carbon stocks Reduced poverty Reduced biodiversity loss Increased resilience of forest ecosystems Country - FIP Program Outcomes (5-10 yrs) Sustainable management of forests and forest landscapes to address drivers of deforestation and forest degradation An institutional and legal/regulatory framework that supports sustainable management of forests and protects rights of local communities and indigenous peoples Local communities and indigenous peoples capacity strengthened to access information and participate in decision making Project/ Program - FIP Indicative Outcomes & Outputs (2-7 yrs) Project/ Program FIP indicative activities (1-7 yrs) Tons of CO 2 sequestered / emissions avoided in project/program area Hectares of protected forest in project/program area Investments outside the forest sector Hectares of forest restored/afforested in program area Government institutions provided with capacity building support to improve management of forest resources Investments in sustainable management of forests, including protection Number of people in targeted forest communities with increased monetary or non-monetary benefits from forest resources Reforms in forest policy, legislation or other regulations Institutional capacity, forest governance and information FIP Inputs New & additional resources supplementing existing ODA flows REDD+ or equivalent forest strategies (incl. identification of drivers of deforestation and forest degradation)

4 Global - CIF Final Outcome (15-20 yrs) Improved low carbon, climate resilient development Country - Transformative Impact (10-15 yrs) Core objective: Reduced GHG emissions from deforestation and forest degradation; enhancement of forest carbon stocks Co-benefit objective: Reduced poverty through improved quality of life of forest dependant indigenous peoples and forest communities Co-benefit objective: Reduced biodiversity loss and increased resilience of forest ecosystems to climate variability and change Country - FIP Catalytic Replication Outcomes (5-10 yrs) Increased direct management of forest resources by local communities and indigenous peoples Reduced deforestation and forest degradation and enhanced conservation Improved enabling environment for REDD + and sustainable management of forests Access to predictable and adequate financial resources, incl. results-based incentives for REDD+ and sustainable management of forests Regional level: Replication of FIP learning in non-fip countries Project/ Program - FIP Outputs & Outcomes (2-7 yrs) Project/ Program - FIP Activities (1-7 yrs) Sustainable management of forests and forest landscapes to address drivers of deforestation and forest degradation Reduced pressure on forest and its ecosystems An institutional and legal/regulatory framework that supports sustainable management of forests and protects the rights of local communities and indigenous peoples Empowered local communities and indigenous peoples and protection of their rights Increased capacity to address direct and underlying drivers of deforestation and forest degradation (as identified in national REDD+ strategies or equivalents ) Investments outside the forest sector Investments in sustainable management of forests, including protection Institutional capacity, forest governance and information CIF Program New & additional resources for REDD+ implementation Leveraging Increased other public & private sources of financing / investment Integration of learning by development actors active in REDD+ Knowledge Management Learning about piloting & implementation captured & shared across projects and programs FIP Inputs New & additional resources supplementing existing ODA flows REDD+ or equivalent forest strategies (incl. identification of drivers of deforestation and forest degradation)

5 Linking projects/programs with FIP objectives The revised results framework requires that projects/programs submitted for Sub-Committee approval clearly articulate how the outputs will contribute to a FIP outcome (results chain)... include a DRAFT results frameworks at the program/project level with a set of concise output indicators

6 M&E Reports M&E system magic triangle Evidence based decision making An M&E report is an opportunity for implementers to inform themselves & others (stakeholders, partners, donors, etc.) on the progress, problems, difficulties encountered, success & lessons learned during implementation of programs and activities An M&E reports is a communication tool to present M&E results by presenting raw data & information as knowledge Key message: FIP M&E is primarily a management tool for the country to make informed decisions concerning the transformational process public accountability and learning

7 FIP results reporting framework FIP Design Document Approved FIP Results Framework ANNUAL report FIP operational report CIF independent evaluation Endorsed Investment Plan (IP) IP results framework IP implementation progress report Country program evaluations Approved projects/programs Project/program results framework Project/program implementation progress report Project/ Program evaluations Planning Monitoring Reporting Evaluation

8 Implementing a programmatic approach OBJECTIVE: Reporting progress in implementing the Investment Plan Reduced/avoided GHG emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and enhanced forest carbon stocks Country in the lead of reporting: Dialogue among development partners broad based ownership Consolidate/coordinate project/program output information sharing lessons Key message: FIP pilot country is the central reporting unit to the FIP Sub- Committee

9 FIP M&E Reports Phase 1: Establish baselines for FIP indicators Phase 2: Portfolio development reporting Phase 3: Results reporting Implementation status of the Investment Plan (outputs, outcomes, co-benefits) Key accomplishments/lessons Key issues / challenges Plans for next reporting period Key message: BASELINES AND TARGETS need to be established by April 2013

10 Implementing a programmatic approach - CONCLUSION Strategic management of the transformation process FIP pilot countries need to develop their own theory of change Coherent M&E system FIP indicators need to be part of the national M&E system with clear assigned organizational roles and responsibilities Facilitation convening power to bring together various stakeholders on a regular basis (at least once a year) to discuss progress and share lessons Capacity human and technical capacity to consolidate data and prepare reports

11 Implementing a programmatic approach CONCLUSION FIP pilot country is the central reporting unit to the FIP Sub- Committee FIP M&E is primarily a management tool for the country to make decisions concerning the transformational process public accountability and learning BASELINES AND TARGETS need to be established by April 2013 Don t forget the E in M&E Countries need to take the lead in the evaluation process this requires evaluation capacity at the national level

12 Managing for Results working together Thank you! Contact: Guido Geissler