Adopting the Eurocodes:

Transcription

1 Adopting the Eurocodes: Why, When and How? TSB Public Lecture Wednesday, 6 th August 2014 Professor David A Nethercot Tan Swan BEng Endowed Professor 1

2 IStructE View of Structural Eurocodes The Structural Eurocodes are the most wide-ranging change to codification of Structural Design ever experienced in the UK. They are in many ways the most technically advanced suite of structural design codes anywhere in the world. 2

3 Structural Eurocodes 1973, UK (Denmark and Ireland) sign the Treaty of Rome Removal of barriers to free movement of goods and services within the EEC National Standards for construction works seen as one such barrier Elimination of National Standards for Structural Engineering Work commenced on common standards for use within all member countries Cover all aspects of structural design and execution 3

4 Current Position 40 years on 10 Structural Eurocodes Cover all materials, including Geotechnics, as well as Basis of Design, Loading and Seismic 58 parts Thousands of pages Now implemented throughout Europe 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9

10 10

11 11

12 The Structural Eurocodes - Scope The structural Eurocodes are EN 1990 Basis of structural design EN 1991 Actions on structures EN 1992 Design of concrete structures EN 1993 Design of steel structures EN 1994 Design of composite steel and concrete structures EN 1995 Design of timber structures EN 1996 Design of masonry structures EN 1997 Geotechnical design EN 1998 Design of structures for earthquake resistance EN 1999 Design of aluminium structures 12

13 Development European Commission Project teams (1975) Considerable variability in scope and style CEN (European body responsible for Standardisation) CEN TC 250 overall responsibility (1989) New Project teams ENV and EN Input from National Standards Organisations Limited use in practice of ENVs National Application Documents Gulliotine 13

14 Particular Features No duplication of material Efficient in theory Inconvenient to refer to different sections when conducting a single task Even more so if moving across several documents e.g. composite bridge Navigation through and between documents 14

15 Axis System Follows that used by computer software xx - along the member yy - axis of the cross-section zz - axis for the cross section 15

16 Language Equivalent meaning in several European languages Actions and Loads 16

17 Arrangement Similar sequence in documents Grouped by task not by need i.e. shear checks not beam design Scope to repackage 17

18 Code not Textbook English speaking Mainland Europe guidance, procedure principles 18

19 What does adoption mean for countries outside the EU? Switzerland, Norway... Malaysia, Hong Kong, Singapore... USA, China, Australia... 19

20 Role of Structural Codes Codes don t provide imagination, concepts and flair Codes don t replace personnel experience, knowledge and understanding Therefore use them wisely and creatively, not in an unthinking and prescriptive fashion 20

21 Assist in ensuring the integrity of structural designs and thence the production of safe structures Modus Operandus varies e.g. Italy vs UK Invoked in contracts, insurance etc Questionable value of designed according to the Code 21

22 1975 Commission of the European Community Common design criteria Common understanding Facilitate exchanges Facilitate marketing Common basis for R & D Increase competitiveness 22

23 BS0 A Standard for Standards 6 aims of Standardisation i. To simplify the growing variety of products and procedures ii. To improve communications iii. To promote overall economy iv. To ensure safety v. To protect consumer and community interests vi. To eliminate trade barriers Obvious potential for conflict 23

24 Dr Flint chairman Part 3 of BS5400 writing in 1980 Designers have different priorities. Many plead for simplicity in a Code both for speed of application and to enable it to be used by Engineers with limited experience. Some expect rules to be both simple and all embracing. Others expect that they should refer to fundamental knowledge when designing major bridges and want freedom for experienced designers to work beyond the scope of a Code. Those competing for worldwide markets require the Code to produce the most economical bridges. Simplicity of design rules and economy in the material content of a bridge are incompatible for other than simple structures. Researchers desire a code to be technically perfect and comprehensive, making use of the most recent research results. 24

25 Use of Codes Part of the portfolio of assistance available to the structural designer: Manufacturers literature Design guides Software Textbooks Worked examples Substantial infrastructure supporting the use of a (major) code 25

26 Codes Supplement Product Standards Manufacturers Literature Designer Design Guides Textbooks Software Manuals Worked Examples Amplify Simplify Education, Experience and Understanding 26

27 Transition The onset of new or revised regulations invariably heralds a trying period of the unfortunate people who have to work such regulations. This applies both to those who have to comply with, and those who have to administer, such regulations. 27

28 Transition Costs 2500M - UK Steel Construction Industry 200M - Total Design Costs 100M - Fraction directly Code related 10M - Efficiency loss? - Consequence of misapplication failure 28

29 Item Cost of purchasing 1 set of Structural Eurocodes including National Annexes (estimate) 2,750 Cost of buying guidance documents (assumed) 1,000 Cost of updating software (assumed) 20,000 Attendance at technical seminars (assume 3 days per person) Cost of seminars (assume 150 net each seminar) = 16 x Cost of attendance = 16 x 3 x 7.5 x 50 Familiarisation with codes in the office (assume 12 man-days for each person) = 16 x 12 x 7.5 x 50 Alterations to standard in house specification documents (allow 14 documents at an average of 1 man-day each ) = 14 x 7.5 x 50 Loss of productivity during first year of change (assume average annual billing (productive time) = 1600 and 10% loss of productivity) = 1600 x 16 x 0.1 x 50 7,200 18,000 72,500 5, ,000 Total 254,700 Note: The cost rate is based on costs averaged over all staff, from junior technician to director/partner and is not intended to include an element of profit. 29

30 Why adopt Comprehensive and up to date coverage Widespread adoption throughout Europe and possibly beyond Supporting infrastructure will migrate to Eurocode basis Clients and Insurers likely to specify Basis for Technical Education (in Europe) 30

31 Supporting Infrastructure General information on available resources Simplified and/or more limited presentations of the Code Rules Explanatory texts aimed at experienced Engineers unfamiliar with the particular provisions of the Codes. Supplementary material expanding on Code provisions and/or making their use easier Text-books giving background and explanation of how the provisions should be used Illustrative worked examples Computer software Short courses for practicing Engineers Teaching materials aimed at undergraduate students 31

32 Eurocode Expert 32

33 Structural Codes 33

34 IStructE Manuals Thomas Telford s Designer s Guide to

35 35

36 NCCI Non Contradictory Complimentary Information Provides amplification and explanation Fills (some) gaps User friendly 36

37 Appraisal Suite of Structural Eurocodes represent a major technical resource They are already implemented in virtually all European countries, with substantial interest from outside Europe They aren t perfect; to be used effectively they require the supporting infrastructure to be in place Adopting (or adapting and adopting) represents a major task requiring planning and resourcing Events are moving quickly; the situation is much changed from 5 years ago 37

38 Background to the study IStructE approached by ODPM in December 2003 National Strategy for Eurocodes Committee formed Chairman Professor David Nethercot, President IStructE Work commenced, 1 February 2004 Report submitted to ODPM, 30 April

39 39

40 40

41 41

42 APPRAISAL Only a part of the designer s available material Balance competitive and comprehensive vs ease of use Facilitate not restrict assist and guide vs prevent Need to sell the benefits All estimates of production time will be exceeded 42

43 Conclusion 1 The Structural Eurocodes are: Comprehensive in their coverage Written in a consistent style across the different parts A reflection of the most up to date knowledge 43

44 Conclusion 2 The Structural Eurocodes are not: Easy to use A continuation of the style of earlier National Codes 44

45 Conclusion 3 Adopting the Structural Eurocodes requires: A planned approach Realisation that resources will be needed Recognition of the importance of supporting material Appreciation of the scale of the task 45