DECISION MEMO. Kelly s Pond / NFSR 204 Hazard Tree Removal. USDA Forest Service Sam Houston National Forest Montgomery County, Texas
|
|
- Antony Skinner
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DECISION MEMO Kelly s Pond / NFSR 204 Hazard Tree Removal USDA Forest Service Sam Houston National Forest Montgomery County, Texas Decision I have decided to remove approximately 500 hazard trees in and around Kelly s Pond Recreation Area, in Compartments 34 and 35. In addition, I have decided to remove about 500 hazard trees along National Forest System Roads (NFSR) 204 and 215, in Compartments 21, 28 and These areas are located in Montgomery County about 11 miles west of New Waverly (see attached map). Hazard trees are trees that are dead, dying or leaning over roads or campsites, posing a hazard to the public. The recent drought conditions have resulted in mature pine tree mortality along the mile-long NFSR 271 that leads into Kelly s Pond, as well as in and around the areas used for camping/picnicking within the recreation area, covering approximately 60 acres. On NFSRs 204 and 215, the hazard trees are located within 150 feet of either side of the road, covering about 80 acres. The hazard trees present a possible health and safety risk for visitors to this popular dispersed camping area and shall be removed in accordance with the 1996 Revised Land Management Plan for the National Forests and Grasslands in Texas (the Plan). The tree removal will also help to alleviate potential fuel loading issues. Trees would be removed by using a commercial timber sale. Between 5 and 10 percent of the dead trees would be left standing and/or cut and left to provide additional habitat for various wildlife species, some moved to strategic locations to block vehicle traffic. Kelly s Pond serves as a dispersed camping area, picnic area, and Multi-Use Trailhead. In addition, hunter camps lie scattered along NRSR 271. The recreation area and NFSR 271 have been closed until the safety hazards can be corrected. NFSR 204 and NFSR 215 are busy roads used by forest visitors, as well as residents of neighborhoods bordering the Sam Houston National Forest. Kelly s Pond Recreation Area lies on flat to gently rolling slopes typical of the West Gulf Coastal Plain. Loblolly and shortleaf pine with scattered, mixed hardwoods dominate the overstory vegetation. The Plan allocates this Kelly s Pond Recreation Area to Management Area 9b, Minimally Developed Recreation Sites. This project falls within the Plan s guidance for operation and maintenance in the Minimally Developed Recreation Sites Management Area. The Plan allocates the areas along NFSRs 204, 215, and 271 to Management Area 2, Redcockaded Woodpecker Emphasis, which has a secondary management emphasis on dispersed recreation use. This project falls within the Plan s guidance for facilities (and road) maintenance in MA-2 as well. Kelly s Pond / NFSR 204 Hazard Tree Removal DM Page 1
2 Also within the project area, Management Area 4, as defined in the Plan, is streamside management zones that incorporate riparian and other areas in and adjacent to intermittent and perennial streams (the Plan pages ). Streamside management zones are buffered with a 50-foot primary zone and a variable secondary zone. No heavy equipment will be allowed within either the primary zone. Heavy equipment could be used in the secondary zone, only if authorized by a Forest Service sales administrator and on a case-by-case basis to remove hazard trees (the Plan, page 158). This project is categorically excluded from documentation in an environmental assessment (EA) or an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the following reasons: Past projects which are similar to the proposed action have had no significant effects on the quality of the human environment, directly, indirectly, or cumulatively. No extraordinary circumstances exist that might cause the action to have significant effects on the human environment. This proposal is consistent with and similar to the categories of action which may be excluded from documentation in an EA or EIS as described in 36 CFR (e) (13). I have considered the best available science in making this decision. The project record demonstrates a thorough review of relevant scientific information, consideration of responsible opposing views, and the acknowledgment of incomplete or unavailable information, scientific uncertainty, and risk. I have considered the effect of this project on climate change, as well as the effect of climate change on this project. Any resulting greenhouse gas emission would not be measurable on a global scale. Design Criteria Soil and Water Quality Tree removal would be restricted during inoperable conditions. The district timber sale administrator would monitor conditions and promptly shut down timber sales when erosion and soil compaction will be unacceptable. Where possible, use dead trees to block illegal user-created roads. To protect water quality, ephemeral streams have been identified and excluded from the hazard tree removal area. These streams will have a minimum 33-foot equipment exclusion zone delineated on the ground. No equipment will be allowed in the zone unless approved by the Forest Service. If other ephemeral streams that require protection are discovered during on-the-ground implementation of project activities, they will be protected according to FW-218. Scenic Resources Within 200 feet of FM 1375; National Forest System Roads 204, 215, and 271; the Lone Star Hiking Trail; and the Multi-Use Trail, marking and felling of trees will be directed away from the edges where this can be accomplished safely. Visible slash within the 200-foot zone, from trees that are cut, will be removed, chipped, or lopped to lie within two feet of the ground. Log landings shall be located out of sight of travelways where possible. If an existing log landing, within sight of the travelway, is still visible it may be used. Kelly s Pond / NFSR 204 Hazard Tree Removal DM Page 2
3 Favor flowering and other visually attractive vegetation to enhance variety when leaving vegetation. Feather the edge of openings by retaining mid and understory trees in a foot zone. Public Involvement On May 29, 2012 I mailed a scoping letter, requesting input, to over 60 individuals, organizations, and agencies that in the past have shown interest in district planning. The letter outlined the proposed action and asked for public comment. I received one response to scoping which included comments and recommendations about the project. I have reviewed this response and considered it in making my decision. The key recommendation has been incorporated into the project, on page 1, in the second paragraph. Internal information revealed that no extraordinary circumstances exist that might cause this action to have significant effects on the quality of the human environment. Findings Required by Other Laws This project is consistent with the management direction, including standards and guidelines, in the Plan). This direction is summarized as follows: The proposed tree removal will conform with the forest-wide standards and guidelines for Travel and Access Management (the Plan, p. 61), Recreation Management (the Plan, p. 73), and with standards and guidelines for MA-9b (the Plan, p. 272) and MA-2 (the Plan, p. 105). The actions of this decision are consistent with direction for Management Area 9b Minimally Developed Recreation Sites (the Plan, pp ) and Management Area 2 Red-cockaded Woodpecker Emphasis (the Plan, pp ). In accordance with FSM and , and regulations set forth in Section 7 (a) of the Endangered Species Act, a Biological Evaluation (BE) was prepared to evaluate the effects of planned activities on Federally listed and proposed threatened and endangered (T&E) species, and Region 8 Forest Service (R8 FS) sensitive species. The Biological Evaluation dated June 29, 2012, states that the proposed project is not likely to adversely affect any federally listed Threatened or Endangered species, and may impact individuals but is not likely to cause a trend to federal listing or loss of viability of any R8 FS sensitive species. I expect the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to concur with this determination. In accordance with the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA), Executive Order 13007, the American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA), and others, archaeological inventory reports were prepared to evaluate the effects of this project on heritage resources. The reports determined that the proposed actions will not adversely affect any historic properties. The State Historic Preservation Office concurred with this determination on June 18, Consultation has also been conducted with the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas and the Caddo Nation of Oklahoma and identified no concerns. Kelly s Pond / NFSR 204 Hazard Tree Removal DM Page 3
4 No known cultural resource sites will be affected by the proposed activity. Implementation Date If no appeals are filed within the 45-day time period, implementation of this decision may begin on, but not before, the 5 th business day following the close of the appeal period (36 CFR 215.9(a)) If an appeal is filed within the 45-day period, implementation of this decision may begin on, but not before, the 15 th business day following the date of the last appeal disposition (36 CFR (b)). Administrative Review and Appeal Opportunities In accordance with 36 CFR 215 and the judicial ruling in Sequoia ForestKeeper v. Tidwell, this decision is subject to notice, comment, and appeal. Individuals or organizations who submitted comments or otherwise expressed interest in this action by the close of the comment period specified in 36 CFR 215, have the right to appeal this decision. The notice of appeal must meet the appeal content requirements at 36 CFR The appeal must be filed (regular mail, fax, , hand-delivery, or express delivery) with the Appeal Deciding Officer, Mark Van Every, Forest Supervisor, 2221 N. Raguet St., Lufkin, Texas 75904, fax (936) The office business hours for those submitting hand-delivered appeals are 8 a.m. through 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. Electronic appeals must be submitted in a format such as an message, plain text (.txt), rich text format (.rtf), or Word (.doc) to [appealssouthern-texas@fs.fed.us]. In cases where no identifiable name is attached to an electronic message, a verification of identity will be required. A scanned signature is one way to provide verification. Appeals, including attachments, must be filed within 45 days from the publication date of the legal notice of decision in the Conroe Courier, the newspaper of record. Attachments received after the 45 day appeal period will not be considered. The publication date in the Conroe Courier is the exclusive means for calculating the time to file an appeal. Those wishing to appeal this decision should not rely upon dates or timeframe information provided by any other source. Kelly s Pond / NFSR 204 Hazard Tree Removal DM Page 4
5 Contact Person For additional information concerning this decision, contact Cheryl Prewitt at the USDA Forest Service, Sam Houston Ranger District, 394 FM 1375 West, New Waverly, TX 77358, or phone at (409) Signature and Date Responsible Official Warren L. Oja District Ranger 394 FM 1375 West New Waverly, TX Date The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C or call (800) (voice) or (202) (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Kelly s Pond / NFSR 204 Hazard Tree Removal DM Page 5
DECISION MEMO SFA EXPERIMENTAL FOREST HERBACEOUS POND RESTORATION AUGUST, 2009 ANGELINA/SABINE RANGER DISTRICT ANGELINA NATIONAL FOREST
402 C B B DECISION MEMO SFA EXPERIMENTAL FOREST HERBACEOUS POND RESTORATION AUGUST, 2009 ANGELINA/SABINE RANGER DISTRICT ANGELINA NATIONAL FOREST NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS USDA FOREST SERVICE, REGION 8
More informationDECISION MEMO. Steve Simpson and Associates, Inc. Simpson #114 & #116 Gas Well Project Compartment 106
DECISION MEMO Steve Simpson and Associates, Inc. Simpson #114 & #116 Gas Well Project Compartment 106 USDA FOREST SERVICE REGION 8 NATIONAL FORESTS AND GRASSLANDS IN TEXAS SABINE NATIONAL FOREST ANGELINA/SABINE
More informationDecision Memo Tongass National Forest. Wrangell Ranger District. Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010
Decision Memo Tongass National Forest Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010 Decision It is my decision to authorize pre-commercial thinning (PCT) on approximately 7,500 acres of overstocked young-growth forest
More informationPROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project
PROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project The USDA Forest Service is proposing to release and prune living apple trees in the Manchester Ranger District,
More informationDECISION MEMO. Bull Bear 1H-18 Oil and Gas Pipeline
DECISION MEMO Bull Bear 1H-18 Oil and Gas Pipeline USDA, Forest Service Cibola National Forest, Black Kettle National Grasslands Roger Mills County, Oklahoma BACKGROUND: Laredo Petroleum, Inc., in order
More informationEnvironmental Assessment
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service May2016 Environmental Assessment Boy Scouts of America Camp Strake Project Sam Houston National Forest, National Forests and Grasslands in Texas San
More informationPRELIMINARY DECISION MEMO
PRELIMINARY DECISION MEMO Snoqualmie Christmas Tree Project USDA Forest Service Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Snoqualmie Ranger District King County, Washington Proposed Action, Purpose and Need
More informationDECISION MEMO. Non-Commercial Thinning on the Ocala National Forest (PALS project # 39238)
Decision DECISION MEMO Non-Commercial Thinning on the Ocala National Forest (PALS project # 39238) USDA Forest Service Ocala National Forest Lake, Marion, and Putnam County, Florida Based on the analysis
More informationDECISION NOTICE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI)
DECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI) FOR CASA LOMA RECREATION RESIDENCE PERMIT RENEWAL U.S. FOREST SERVICE CIBOLA NATIONAL FOREST SANDIA RANGER DISTRICT BERNALILLO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
More informationDECISION MEMO. East Fork Blacktail Trail Reroute
Page 1 of 6 DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County Background The East Fork Blacktail Trail #6069 is a mainline trail in the Snowcrest Mountains. The Two Meadows Trail
More informationPublic Rock Collection
Public Rock Collection Eagle-Holy Cross Ranger District, White River national Forest Eagle County, Colorado T7S, R80W, Section 18 & T6S, R84W, Section 16 Comments Welcome The Eagle-Holy Cross Ranger District
More informationProposed Action: In response to resource specialist concerns raised during internal scoping, the following restrictions will apply:
DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Inyan Kara Riders Motorcycle Enduro Event Rocky Mountain Region Thunder Basin National Grassland Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests Douglas Ranger District April 2011
More informationOn/Off periods Improvements Grazing System. 2 fence segments. 1 water development, 2 cattle guards
DECISION NOTICE HENRY CREEK AND SWAMP CREEK RANGE ALLOTMENT MANAGEMENT PLANS REVISION U.S. FOREST SERVICE PLAINS/THOMPSON FALLS RANGER DISTRICT LOLO NATIONAL FOREST SANDERS COUNTY, MONTANA DECISION Based
More informationDECISION MEMO Divide Creek Barrier Enhancement
Page 1 of 7 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Butte Ranger District Silver Bow County, Montana T. 2 N., R. 9 W., Section 32 The North Fork of Divide Creek is approximately 4 miles west of the
More informationDecision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact
Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Gold Lake Bog Research Natural Area Boundary Adjustment and Nonsignificant Forest Plan Amendment #53 USDA Forest Service Middle Fork Ranger District,
More informationDECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF No SIGNIFICANT IMPACT HOPKINS FIRE SALVAGE
DECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF No SIGNIFICANT IMPACT HOPKINS FIRE SALVAGE DECISION U.S. FOREST SERVICE OCALA NATIONAL FOREST SEMINOLE RANGER DISTRICT MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA Based upon my review of the
More informationSupervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA
Supervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA 24019 540-265-5100 www.fs.fed.us/r8/gwj James River Ranger District Glenwood-Pedlar Ranger District 810A East Madison Avenue 27 Ranger Lane Covington,
More informationProposed Action for Motorized Travel Management on the North Kaibab Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Proposed Action for Motorized Travel Management on the North Kaibab Ranger District Kaibab National Forest March 2010 The U.S. Department of Agriculture
More informationCivil Rights Impact Analysis for Sault Ste. Marie Conveyance/Raco Construction Project
Civil Rights Impact Analysis for Sault Ste. Marie Conveyance/Raco Construction Project Introduction This document contains information about the Hiawatha National Forest (HNF) proposal to sell the Sault
More informationLocally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group. Mark Habiger NRCS
Locally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group Mark Habiger NRCS 1 What Is Locally Led Conservation? Community Stakeholders 1. Assessing their natural resource conservation needs 2. Setting community
More informationTelegraph Forest Management Project
Telegraph Forest Management Project Black Hills National Forest Northern Hills Ranger District Lawrence and Pennington Counties, South Dakota Proposed Action and Request for Comments March 2008 Table of
More informationCHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Monongahela National Forest Greenbrier Ranger District Box 67 Bartow, WV 24920 304-456-3335 CHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT USDA Forest
More informationNorth Carolina, 2010
North Carolina, Introduction Mark J. Brown and Barry D. New North Carolina s first annualized forest survey was completed in and results were published in e-science Update SRS 029. There were 5,800 ground
More informationDecision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service June 2011 Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Vail Ski Area Forest Health Project Holy Cross Ranger District, White River National
More informationHuron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Huron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647 989-826-3252 (Voice) 989-826-6073 (Fax) Dial 711 for relay service
More informationLogo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information Highway 35 Agriculture
Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information United States Forest Mt. Hood National Forest Hood River Ranger District Department of Service 6780 Highway 35 Agriculture Mt.
More informationSmall Project Proposal
Combined Scoping and Notice and Comment Document Small Project Proposal USDA Forest Service Fishlake National Forest Beaver Ranger District Sevier County, Utah The purpose of this document is to inform
More informationSCOPING STATEMENT OF THE PROPOSED ACTION FOR THE
SCOPING STATEMENT OF THE PROPOSED ACTION FOR THE PANGUITCH LAKE COURTESY DOCK INSTALLATION PROJECT U.S. FOREST SERVICE DIXIE NATIONAL FOREST CEDAR CITY RANGER DISTRICT GARFIELD COUNTY, UTAH PROJECT BACKGROUND
More informationCOUNTY, OREGON T20 S R14E SECTIONS 25 AND 36; T20S R15E SECTIONS 19-34; AND T21S R15E SECTIONS 3-9 AND
PINE MOUNTAIN SAGE GROUSE HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT Bend/ Fort Rock Ranger District Deschutes National Forest DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON T20 S R14E SECTIONS 25 AND 36; T20S R15E SECTIONS 19-34; AND T21S
More informationCommercial Harvest of Spruce Tips
United States Department of Agriculture Commercial Harvest of Spruce Tips Forest Service Alaska Region Tongass National Forest Sitka Ranger District R10-MB-790 April 2015 The U.S. Department of Agriculture
More informationRECORD OF DECISION BATTLE PARK C&H ALLOTMENTS FOR LIVESTOCK GRAZING ON THE AND MISTY MOON S&G. United States Department of Agriculture.
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Bighorn National Forest RECORD OF DECISION FOR LIVESTOCK GRAZING ON THE BATTLE PARK C&H AND MISTY MOON S&G ALLOTMENTS September
More informationForest Service Highway 28 West Boyce, LA / United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Kisatchie National Forest Calcasieu Ranger District 9912 Highway 28 West Boyce, LA 71409 318/793-9427 ` File Code: 1950 Date: July 1, 2016 Dear Friend
More informationDecision Memo USDA Forest Service Lookout Mountain Ranger District, Ochoco National Forest Crook County, Oregon Canyon Creek and Reservoir Allotments
Decision Memo USDA Forest Service Lookout Mountain Ranger District, Ochoco National Forest Crook County, Oregon Canyon Creek and Reservoir Allotments Background The Canyon Creek and Reservoir Allotments
More informationDECISION NOTICE & FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OUTFITTER GUIDE MOTORIZED TOURS SPECIAL USE PERMIT ISSUANCES
Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant 1 Impact for the Outfitter Guide Motorized Tours DECISION NOTICE & FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OUTFITTER GUIDE MOTORIZED TOURS SPECIAL USE PERMIT ISSUANCES
More informationInvasive Dandelion Removal in the Alpine Zone. Decision Memo. White Mountain National Forest, NH and ME
United States Department of Agriculture Invasive Dandelion Removal in the Alpine Zone White Mountain National Forest, NH and ME Decision Memo For Information Contact: Dan Sperduto Supervisor s Office 71
More informationDear Interested Party,
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Medicine Bow Routt National Forests and Thunder Basin National Grassland Parks Ranger District 100 Main Street, PO Box 158 Walden, CO 80480-0158 970-723-2700
More informationDECISION MEMO. USDA Forest Service. Butte District Silver Bow County T4N, R8W, Section 36
Page 1 of 5 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Butte District Silver Bow County T4N, R8W, Section 36 Northwestern Energy operates utility systems and facilities on federal lands under a Master
More informationDecision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact
Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Indigo and Middle Fork Willamette Enhancement Project USDA Forest Service Middle Fork Ranger District Willamette National Forest Lane County, Oregon
More informationEnvironmental Assessment
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service November 2009 Environmental Assessment Paintrock Lakes Area Recreation Sites Redevelopment Project Medicine Wheel / Paintrock Ranger District, Bighorn
More informationForest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station August 22 Forest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest Larry T. DeBlander About the author Larry T. DeBlander
More informationNational Best Management Practices Monitoring Summary Report
United States Department of Agriculture National Best Management Practices Monitoring Summary Report Fiscal Year 2013 Forest Service FS-1042 January 2015 United States Department of Agriculture Forest
More informationNRCS Conservation Programs Update
NRCS Conservation Programs Update Opportunities for Fruit and Vegetable Growers Chad Cochrane Resource Conservationist USDA-NRCS Fruit and Vegetable Farms Fruit and Vegetable Farms Focus on Resource Concerns
More informationManchester Ranger District. Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service February 2009 Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project Decision Memo USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region Green Mountain
More informationEffects of All-Terrain Vehicles on Forested Lands and Grasslands
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service National Technology & Development Program Recreation Management 0823 1811 SDTDC December 2008 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration
More informationCATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS Developed Recreation/Trails, Wilderness & Roadless Jasper Mountain Priest Lake Ranger District Idaho Panhandle National Forest Description of the
More informationProposed Action Report Big Creek WBP Enhancement Project
Proposed Action Report Big Creek WBP Enhancement Project USDA Forest Service Cascade Ranger District Boise National Forest Valley County, Idaho July 2013 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION The encroachment
More informationScenery Report Salmon Reforestation Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service May 12, 2014 Scenery Report Salmon/Scott River Ranger District, Klamath National Forest Siskiyou County, California For Information Contact: Bob Talley
More informationDRAFT DECISION MEMO. Auk Auk /Black Diamond (Trail 44) Re-route
DRAFT DECISION MEMO Auk Auk /Black Diamond (Trail 44) Re-route USDA Forest Service Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District Colusa County, California I. Background Trail 44 is a major Off-
More informationConger Rock Harvesting Project
Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Conger Rock Harvesting Project Aspen-Sopris Ranger District White River National Forest Gunnison County, Colorado T11S, R88W, Section 21 and 22 Decision
More informationTRENDS IN DELAWARE S FORESTS
United States Department of Agriculture TRENDS IN DELAWARE S FORESTS Forest Service Northeastern Research Station NE-INF-150-02 Delaware Department of Agriculture Forest Service DELAWARE FORESTS Forests
More informationDECISION MEMO. Aurora New Horizons Project
Page 1 of 7 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County In 2005 a decision covering approximately the same proposal was analyzed and a Decision Memo was signed.
More informationBoulder Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Boulder Ranger District 2140 Yarmouth Avenue Boulder, CO 80301-1615 Voice: (303) 541-2500 Web: www.fs.usda.gov/arp Fax: (303) 541-2515 File Code:
More informationOUTREACH NOTICE 2018 TEMPORARY POSITIONS BEAVERHEAD-DEERLODGE NATIONAL FOREST HOW TO APPLY: RECREATION POSITIONS BEING HIRED:
OUTREACH NOTICE 2018 TEMPORARY POSITIONS BEAVERHEAD-DEERLODGE NATIONAL FOREST The Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest will be filling multiple temporary (seasonal) positions for the upcoming 2018 field
More informationBackground. Purpose and Need. Proposal. Mitigation and Design Features
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest Madison Ranger District 5 Forest Service Rd Ennis, MT 59729 406 682-4253 File Code: 1950 Date: November 20, 2013
More informationUnited States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service
Jericho Winter, USDA NRCS Resource Soil Scientist Jeremy Baker, Rural Conservationist, East Multnomah SWCD Kim Galland, Multnomah Co. District Conservationist United States Department of Agriculture Natural
More informationBUDGET BASICS TRAINING TOPIC: DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS. Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)
BUDGET BASICS TRAINING TOPIC: DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) Acknowledgment Statement 2 You understand and acknowledge that: the training you are about to take does
More informationDECISION MEMO. West Fork Blacktail Deer Creek Hardened Crossing
Page 1 of 6 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County T12S, R4W, Section 30 The project is in the Gravelly Landscape, Snowcrest Recommended Wilderness Management
More informationDECISION MEMO Besson Special Use Permit Ottawa National Forest
I DECISION DECISION MEMO Besson Special Use Permit Ottawa National Forest T49N R37W Section 19, 30 Houghton County; T49N R38W Sections 24,25 Ontonagon County Forest Roads 1157, 1157-G, and spur road in
More informationFARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service FARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions Conserving Natural Resources on Colorado s Privately Owned Farmland Farm Bill
More informationFINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OWL CREEK GRAVEL PIT EXPANSION U.S. FOREST SERVICE
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OWL CREEK GRAVEL PIT EXPANSION U.S. FOREST SERVICE OURAY RANGER DISTRICT OURAY COUNTY, COLORADO BACKGROUND The Owl Creek Gravel Pit, also known as the Spruce Ridge Pit,
More informationWest Branch LeClerc Creek Watershed Restoration Project Environmental Assessment
West Branch LeClerc Creek Watershed Restoration Project Environmental Assessment Decision Notice, Finding of No Significant Impact, and Response to Public Comments April 2015 USDA Forest Service Colville
More informationScoping Document. Precious Minerals Mining and Refining Corporation East Walker Clay Mine Expansion Project Lyon County, Nevada
Scoping Document Precious Minerals Mining and Refining Corporation East Walker Clay Mine Expansion Project Lyon County, Nevada United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service USDA Forest Service
More informationCorn Objective Yield Survey Data,
Washington, D.C. Corn Objective Yield Survey Data, 1992-2006 Released May 18, 2007, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on call Ty Kalaus
More informationUpper Applegate Road Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service March 2008 Environmental Assessment Upper Applegate Road Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project Siskiyou Mountains Ranger District Rogue River-Siskiyou
More informationFor the property described as: Property Owner: Name. Phone Number. Mailing Address. City. Report Year:
Timber Management Plan For the property described as: Property Owner: Name Phone Number Mailing Address City State Zip Report Year: (This template is provided to assist Cherokee County land owners who
More informationDraft Decision Notice Maroon Bells - Snowmass Wilderness Overnight Visitor Use Management Plan
Draft Decision Notice Maroon Bells - Snowmass Wilderness Overnight Visitor Use Management Plan USDA Forest Service Aspen-Sopris Ranger District, White River National Forest Gunnison Ranger District, Grand
More informationYankee Hill Fuel Treatment Project Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact
Yankee Hill Fuel Treatment Project Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact USDA Forest Service Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests And Pawnee National Grassland Clear Creek Ranger District
More informationSeasonal High Tunnels. Conservation Benefits Interim Practice Standard Financial Assistance Guidance
Seasonal High Tunnels Conservation Benefits Interim Practice Standard Financial Assistance Guidance Financial Assistance Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Today s Focus Conservation Benefits
More informationForest Stewardship Management Plan
Forest Stewardship Management Plan James Starr, Forest Management 06/2003 Forest Stewardship Management Plans Plans must identify and describe actions to protect, manage, maintain and enhance relevant
More informationSlash mats (figure 1) are used to help reduce impacts
Fire United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Technology & Development Program May 2008 5100 0851 2312 MTDC Removing Slash Mats James Scott Groenier, Project Leader Slash mats (figure 1)
More informationSugarbush Valley House Lift Replacement Project
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Eastern Region Sugarbush Valley House Lift Replacement Project Decision Memo March 2014 Green Mountain National Forest Rochester Ranger District Town
More informationThe project will be conducted in partnership with the Nez Perce Tribe.
DECISION MEMO Tributary to Brushy Fork Culvert Replacements Private Land USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Powell Ranger District Nez Perce Clearwater National Forests Idaho County, Idaho I. Decision
More informationDECISION MEMO CATARACT CREEK-MOUNTAIN MEADOW PLAN OF OPERATIONS
Page 1 of 8 DECISION MEMO CATARACT CREEK-MOUNTAIN MEADOW PLAN OF OPERATIONS USDA Forest Service Madison Ranger District Madison County, Montana T2S, R3W, sections 16 & 21 Background Moen Excavation of
More informationBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest Madison Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest Madison Ranger District 5 Forest Service Road Ennis, MT 59729 406 682-4253 File Code: 1950 Date: April 4, 2012
More information3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance 3-13.1 Short-term Uses and Long-term Productivity NEPA requires consideration of the relationship
More informationDust Bowl and USDA - NRCS. Kim Wright USDA-NRCS Program Liaison Bryan, Texas
Dust Bowl and USDA - NRCS Kim Wright USDA-NRCS Program Liaison Bryan, Texas Who is the NRCS? The Natural Resources Conservation Service is a Federal agency that works in partnership with the American people
More informationRocky Mountain Regional Office
Forest Service File Code: 1570 Route To: Rocky Mountain Regional Office 740 Simms Street Golden, CO 80401-4702 Voice: 303-275-5350 TDD: 303-275-5367 Date: June 13, 2013 Subject: To: Recommendation Memorandum
More informationEfficiency and Conservation in Agricultural Water Use
Efficiency and Conservation in Agricultural Water Use Scott D. Edwards Assistant State Conservationist for Programs, June 10, 2017 As the Nation s largest water user, agriculture accounts for about 80
More informationDraft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (DN/FONSI)
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service January 2016 Draft Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact (DN/FONSI) Rock Creek Vegetation and Fuels Healthy Forest Restoration Act
More informationSAN LUIS VALLEY PUBLIC LANDS CENTER
Decision Notice And Finding of No Significant Impact Watershed and Fisheries Conservation Treatments SAN LUIS VALLEY PUBLIC LANDS CENTER USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Public Lands Center Rio
More informationNRCS Standards and Criteria for Dead Animal Composting
Helping People Help the Land NRCS Standards and Criteria for Dead Animal Composting Matthew Robert, PE Agricultural Engineer Champaign, Illinois www.il.nrcs.usda.gov Matthew.Robert@il.usda.gov Following
More informationThe 2014 Farm Bill. Texas Watershed Coordinators Roundtable Waco, Texas July 31, 2014
The 2014 Farm Bill Texas Watershed Coordinators Roundtable Waco, Texas July 31, 2014 Differences Between the 2008 and 2014 Farm Bill Conservation Programs 2 Reauthorizes Programs from the 2008 Farm Bill
More informationDECISION MEMO. Fall Creek Trail Reroute
DECISION MEMO Fall Creek Trail Reroute USDA Forest Service Willamette National Forest Middle Fork Ranger District Lane County, OR Township 18S, Range 3E, Section 21, Willamette Meridian DECISION It is
More informationDECISION MEMO IDAHO DREAM PLAN OF OPERATIONS
Page 1 of 7 BACKGROUND DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Dillon Ranger District Beaverhead County The project area is included in the Ermont Mining District in T5S R11W Section 36 and T6S R11W Section
More informationEnvironmental Assessment
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Stanislaus National Forest Pedro Flat Campground (27121) Environmental Assessment Stanislaus National Forest Summit Ranger District Tuolumne County,
More informationFile Code: 1950 Date: March 22, 2011
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Mt. Hood National Forest Barlow Ranger District 780 NE Court Street Dufur, OR 97021 541-467-2291 FAX 541-467-2271 File Code: 1950 Date: March 22,
More informationOHV-Sand Camping Project
Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact Siuslaw National Forest South Zone District Lane, Douglas, and Coos Counties, Oregon January 2005 Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official:
More informationLivestock Watering Systems. Mark Green Lead Resource Conservationist USDA-NRCS Springfield, MO
Livestock Watering Systems Mark Green Lead Resource Conservationist USDA-NRCS Springfield, MO 1 Water is generally the MOST Limiting Factor in Grazing Distribution and Maintaining Flexibility of a Grazing
More informationDraft Record of Decision
Final Environmental Impact Statement USDA Forest Service Medicine Bow Routt National Forests Thunder Basin NG Yampa Ranger District Grand and Routt Counties, Colorado Introduction... 1 Background... 2
More informationNational Forests in North Carolina Pisgah National Forest Grandfather Ranger District
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service National Forests in North Carolina Pisgah National Forest Grandfather Ranger District 109 E Lawing Dr Nebo, NC 28761-9827 828-652-2144 File Code:
More informationForest Stewardship Program National Standards and Guidelines
Forest Stewardship Program National Standards and Guidelines Second Edition September 2005 USDA Forest Service State & Private Forestry Cooperative Forestry Forest Stewardship Program National Standards
More informationPreliminary Decision Memo 2015 Recreation Residence Projects Odell Lake
2015 Recreation Residence Projects Odell Lake USDA Forest Service Crescent Ranger District, Deschutes National Forest Klamath County, Oregon Background The Crescent Ranger District maintains 66 recreation
More informationDecision Memo. National Ecological Observatory Network Long Term Research Project
National Ecological Observatory Network Long Term Research Project USDA, Forest Service National Forests in Alabama Talladega National Forest Oakmulgee District Bibb and Hale County, Alabama Summary I
More informationWater Talk Series
Kansas Water Talk Series - 2017 Joel A. Willhoft, NRCS Resource Conservationist 785.624.3127 joel.willhoft@ks.usda.gov NRCS Conservation Programs NRCS provides eligible producers financial assistance to
More informationProject Name: Gerber Stew Stewardship Contract CX Log #: OR-014 CX Chase Mtn./ Upper Bear Valley Plantation Thinnings
Decision Memorandum on Action and for Application of: Categorical Exclusion 516 DM2, Appendix 1, 1.12 Hazardous Fuel Reduction (PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION) Project Name: Gerber
More informationEnvironmental Assessment for Road Diobsud Road Repairs
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region Environmental Assessment for Road Diobsud Road Repairs Contents Chapter 1 purpose of and need for action... 3 Introduction...
More informationA Comparison of Two Estimates of Standard Error for a Ratio-of-Means Estimator for a Mapped-Plot Sample Design in Southeast Alaska
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Research Note PNW-RN-532 June 2002 A Comparison of Two Estimates of Standard Error for a Ratio-of-Means Estimator
More informationDecision Memo Young Stand Density Management and Conifer Pruning
Decision Memo 2012-2016 Young Stand Density Management and Conifer Pruning USDA Forest Service Willamette National Forest, Middle Fork Ranger District Lane and Douglas Counties, Oregon Background The purpose
More informationIntroduction. Methodology for Analysis
1 Medicine Lake Caldera Vegetation Treatment Project Scenic Report Prepared by: /s/gary Kedish Natural Resources Specialist for: Big Valley and Doublehead Ranger Districts Modoc National Forest February
More informationParadise and Watson Creek Headcut Treatment Project (see map on next page)
Paradise and Watson Creek Headcut Treatment Project (see map on next page) T 34 S, R 15 E, Sections 11, 13 and 14 The purpose of the project would be to stabilize the stream channel by treating headcuts
More information