Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) Engineering Update

Transcription

1 Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) Engineering Update Andrew Monje Deputy Director for Reliability and Maintainability Engineering Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering NAVSEA R&M Workshop NSWC Carderock, Bethesda MD May 22, 2012 May 2012 Page 1

2 Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 22 MAY REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED to TITLE AND SUBTITLE Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) Engineering Update 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering,Reliability and Maintainability Engineering,3030 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C167,Washington,DC, PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Presented at NAVSEA R&M Workshop May 22, 2012, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock, Bethesda MD 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 12 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

3 Purpose/Outline PURPOSE Provide an update of DoD Activities and Initiatives OUTLINE Policy Guidance and Standardization Workforce Development Summary May 2012 Page 2

4 Policy Reliability Analysis, Planning, Tracking and Reporting DoDI Impetus for Reliability Policy Directed by Dr. Carter in response to memo from DOT&E DASD(SE) to assess existing reliability policy and propose actions to improve effectiveness DoD Acquisition Policy (DoDI ) Does not adequately or uniformly consider R&M engineering activities throughout the acquisition process Fails to capture R&M planning in new or existing acquisition artifacts to inform acquisition decision making DTM (Approved 21 Mar 2011) Amplifies current DoDI by requiring PMs to perform reliability activities Institutionalizes planning and reporting timed to key acquisition activities May 2012 Page 3

5 Policy DTM Key Policy Attributes Mandates specific reliability planning in the SEP and TEMP: Submission of a RAM-Cost Rationale Report (SEP) Comprehensive R&M planning (SEP) Reliability Growth Curves (SEP and TEMP) Mandates identification of reliability contract requirements in the TDS and AS: Translation of AoA sustainment characteristics and Sustainment KPP thresholds into R&M design requirements and contract specifications Identification of systematic processes that the contractor will be required to use to demonstrate achievement of these design requirements Directs PMs and OTAs to assess the likelihood of reliability requirement achievement during IOTE and report this to the MDA at MS C Establishes specific reliability monitoring and reporting throughout the acquisition process as part of established technical reviews and assessments and in the DAES May 2012 Page 4

6 Policy Relationship to DoD Documents Integrating DTM-required engineering activities into DoD Policy Approved Outlines Systems Engineering Plan Technology Development Strategy and Acquisition Strategy Life Cycle Sustainment Plan Comments provided DoDI , Encl 2-9 (T&E) DoDI , Encl 2-7 (SE) DoDI , Encl 2-8 (LCS) In-Work DAES Growth Status TEMP DDT&E evaluating format Status: DAES Growth Status DTM Relationship to DoD Policy Documents Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Approved Comments provided In-work Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) Outline 20 Apr 11 DTM Mar 11* DoDI Encl (2-8) Life-cycle Sustainment DoDI Encl (2-7) Systems Engineering Technology Development Strategy/ Acquisition Strategy Sample Outline 20 Apri11 DoDI Encl (2-9) Test & Evaluation Life-Cycle Sustainment Plan Annotated Outline 15 Sep 11 * Extended to 31 Dec 2012 May 2012 Page 5

7 Guidance and Standardization Defense Acquisition Guidance (DAG) DAG Chapter 4, paragraph updated for fact of life changes Lower Level Implementation Guidance Developing R&M engineering guidance by phase and by program functional areas Services reviewed and commented on MSA and TD phases Services reviewing the EMD phase DoDI LIFE CYCLE ENTRY ICD M D D MS A Phase Tasks 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ENGINEERING TEST AND EVALUATION ICD ITR 2 R&M PLANS MSA PHASE R&M RQMTS ANALYSES TRADEOFF STUDIES AOA RAM-C REPORT SUMMARY 8 9 R&M ANALYSIS REPORTS R&M PLANS TD PHASE 10 INPUT TO TES PROCUREMENT MSA STUDY CONTRACTS 3 5 REVIEW STUDY CONTRACTS May 2012 Page 6

8 Guidance and Standardization Developed contracting language that considers program type and phase for cost-effective application of R&M engineering activities Service review synchronized with EMD phase Entrance criteria for standardization working group R&M Standards working group Priority will be given to standards that directly relate to R&M engineering activities required by the DTM Contracting language will define the standardization activity to contract for R&M Policy What needs to be done? What is available? What are the gaps? Where should solutions reside? Top Level DAG (i.e., Fact of Life) Lower Level Guidance Entry Criteria: Completed Service review of EMD lower level guidance Standards & DIDs Processes May 2012 Page 7

9 Workforce Development Key Terms Competency: OPM definition. an observable, measurable pattern of skills, knowledge, abilities, behaviors & other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully. Example: Employ the systems engineering processes to conduct and evaluate an Analysis of Alternatives for the selected concept from an systems engineering perspective. Sub-Competency: the decomposition of a competency into its more detailed set of skills, knowledge and abilities. Example: Develop an analysis of alternatives employing identification and analysis of alternatives, measures of effectiveness, cost, schedule, concepts of operations, and overall risk, including the sensitivity of each alternative to possible changes in key assumptions or variables. Learning Objective: clearly states the measurable performance the learner will be able to demonstrate at the conclusion of training, including conditions, and criteria of performance. Example: Explain the components of an Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) and identify the characteristics of a complete and well written AoA. May 2012 Page 8

10 Workforce Development Approach Policy Goal: Adequate numbers of trained R&M Engineering Personnel OSD FIPT DAU DTM Guidance Workforce Competency Development SPRDE SPRDE SPRDE SE/PSE SE/PSE Life SE/PSE Life Cycle Life Cycle Competency Cycle Approval Competency Structure Structure Learning Objectives Training Assets Trained Workforce Learning Validation OSD defines: Policy DTM guidance Workforce competencies SE Functional IPT (FIPT) reviews and validates updated workforce competency set Informational meetings with other FIPT functional leads (PM, Contracts, T&E, Logistics, BCEFM) DAU provides training material aligned to approved competency set to meet workforce needs R&M Workforce Development illustrates training development key products and process owners. May 2012 Page 9

11 Workforce Development R&M Competencies PM SE T&E Proc Advanced Intermediate Basic College Core R&M requirements Competencies are focused by program functional areas and span the acquisition life cycle Each competency is decomposed into 2-5 sub-competencies Developing Standard Skill Set focused on college, basic, intermediate, and advanced career levels for supplemental information Sub-competencies are then mapped to DAU courseware learning objectives Opportunities exist to partner with Services and academia to identify core R&M engineering training requirements. The R&M competency structure spans the acquisition life cycle and will address all levels of proficiency. May 2012 Page 10

12 Workforce Development SPRDE Competency Update Plan OSD FIPT DAU 2QFY 12 MSA, TD 3QFY 12 E&MD, P&D 4QFY 12 1QFY 13 DTM Guidance issued by phase R&M competency structure developed SE FIPT reviews and approvals O&S 2QFY 13 Associate to DAU learning objectives Address gaps in training Workforce assessment Define R&M tasks and competencies from DTM Implementation Guidance Coordinate workforce development strategy with SPRDE Functional Leadership Associate R&M competencies against DAU SPRDE courseware learning objectives Identify and address gaps for improvement within the DoD and Academia learning infrastructure Develop measures for determining and assessing workforce capability Schedule approach driven by issuance of DTM Guidance. May 2012 Page 11

13 Summary Services have reviewed and commented on MSA and TD phases competencies EMD phase and contracting language released to Services for review DTM Implementation Guidance serves as basis for R&M competency development Task driven by acquisition phase and program functional areas DTM mandates R&M engineering activities in the acquisition process and is driving an update to SPRDE workforce development May 2012 Page 12