Brian Williams Minnesota Department of Agriculture. Nutrient Efficiency and Management Conference February 15,2012 Morton, MN
|
|
- Deirdre Magdalen Atkinson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Brian Williams Minnesota Department of Agriculture Nutrient Efficiency and Management Conference February 15,2012 Morton, MN
2 Today s Topics Results from: Hwy 90 Drainage Demonstration Nutrient Management Initiative Program Verndale Wellhead Protection Demonstration Project
3 Hwy 90 Drainage Demonstration Water Quality and Nutrient Management Demonstration
4 Hwy 90 Drainage Project Goals Evaluate Best Management Practices effectiveness Evaluate water quality at field-scale Environmental Influences Compare to larger watershed Evaluate long term trends Evaluate economic outcomes for producers Education outreach
5 Hwy 90 Design N-2 N-1 S-2 S-1 80 Spacing Optimum Production (Fall N) 80 Spacing U of M Guidance Spring Applied N 50 Spacing U of M Guidance Spring Applied N 50 Spacing Optimum Production (Fall N)
6 Monitoring Equipment
7 Watershed N-2 Aggressive N-1 BMP Spring N U of M Rate S-2 BMP Spring N U of M Rate S-1 Aggressive Hwy 90 Nutrient Applications 2007 Corn (variable rate) Fall NH3 No N- Serve Spring Urea (uniform) Spring Urea (uniform) (variable rate) Fall 2008 Corn (variable rate) Fall NH3 w/n- Serve Spring Urea (uniform) Spring Urea (uniform) (variable 2009 SB 2010 Corn None Fall NH3 (100#) Spring AMS/Urea(26#) P & K (uniform) None Spring NH3 (75#) Spring AMS/Urea(26#) P&K 85-0 (variable) None Spring NH3 (75#) Spring AMS/Urea(26#) P&K 75-0 (variable) None Fall NH3 (100#) Spring 2011 SB 2012 Corn None Fall NH3 145#/A w/n- Serve (uniform) None Fall NH3 145#/A w/n- Serve (uniform) None Fall NH3 145#/A w/n- Serve (uniform) None Fall NH3 145#/A w/n-
8 yr. Avg. January Snow & 1.4 Precip February March April May June July August September October November December Total Below normal precipitation Above normal precipitation
9 Inches of Drainage by Watershed S-1--50' S-2--50' N-1--80' N-2--80'
10 Highway 90 Drainage 2011 Rain Events & Intensity Drainage Flow & Events
11 2010 Rainfall and Drainage Intense Rain Events in 2010
12 June 25, 2010 Rain Event 50 Spacings 80 Spacings
13 (mg/l) Corn Nitrate-N FWMC Corn Corn Recommended (BMP) 14.2 Aggressive Safe Drinking Water Standard
14 (lbs/acre) Nitrate-N Yield (Pounds of N Lost per Acre) Corn Corn Soy Corn Soybeans 40 Recommended (BMP) Aggressive
15 Pounds of N Lost per Inch of Drainage Average Recommended BMP Aggressive
16 (mg/l) Hwy 90 Total Phosphorous FWMC Recommended (BMP) Aggressive 0.30 MPCA Lake Standard
17 lbs/acre Total Phosphorous Yield (Pounds per Acre) 1.20 Recommended (BMP) Aggressive
18 Phosphorous Soil Test Results
19 Bushels per Acre Hwy 90 Corn Yields Average Yield Difference 19 Bushels per Acre Recommended (BMP) Aggressive
20 Hwy 90 Drainage--Net Return Comparison $200 $180 $160 $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $0 $97.00 $ $ $ Average Difference $54.66 per Acre $ $76.00 Recommended BMP Aggressive
21 Drainage Conclusions Normally 4-5 major drainage events per year Drainage flow normally ceases in early July Drainage flow influenced by crop stage, soil moisture, & intensity 75% of total runoff occurs over short period 35 days in 2007, 34 days in 2008, 48 days in 2009, 25 days in 2010 & 30 days in 2011 Majority of overall drainage has occurred after spring snowmelt-march, and June rain events.
22 Summary Hwy 90 Nitrate Losses 2.1 to 2.5 pounds of N are lost per inch of drainage. Nitrate concentrations were reduced by an average of 2 mg/l when spring applied at a reduced rate. N losses reduced by an average of 4.6 lbs. when spring applied at a 30 lb. reduced rate.
23 Summary Hwy 90 P Losses An additional 77# per acre of P were applied to the aggressive/max production watersheds compared to the BMP comparison plots. Higher P application comparisons resulted in an average increase of.09 mg/l (FWMC) or additional losses of.21 pounds of P per acre.
24 Economic Considerations Corn production years resulted in an average loss of 19 bushels per acre using BMP practices. using actual nutrient input costs and an average corn market price resulted in an average loss of $54 per acre. Today s Prices -19 bushel loss equals $114 per acre. ($6.01 Crop Insurance Price)
25 On-Farm Evaluation of Nitrogen and Phosphorous Nutrient Management
26 1,400 1,200 1,000 Relationship between Grain Corn Production, Acreage, and N Fertilizer Inputs Bushels Produced Planted Acres N Fertilizer Inputs (estimated) 0 Corn Acres (X10000) Est. Tons of N Fertilizer on Corn (X1,000) Bu. Produced (Millions)
27 Site Locations
28 Nutrient Management Initiative Design Either nitrogen or phosphorous site 2 Rates replicated 3X Minimize variables other than N or P No manure or alfalfa history Current soil test required High and very high testing phosphorous fields
29 Nutrient Management Initiative Design Nitrogen Guidance Treatment A (low rate) # per Acre corn following soybeans # per Acre corn following corn Treatment B (high rate) Maintain at least 30# rate separation Strip size minimum of 40 wide by minimum of 600 long can be larger Low N rate check= length Harvest 1 combine swath per strip Weigh wagon or yield monitor
30
31 Enrollment & Producer Agreement Farmer signs an EQIP contract with local USDA- NRCS Ag Center ($1340 payment) New Farmer completes Producer Agreement Contact information, crop consultant & anticipated applications Insure the sites are established correctly Farmer must work with a certified crop adviser validates cropping and harvest info. ($400 payment incentive) New
32 Reporting Information Farmer/Crop Consultant Responsibility Cropping Information July 1 st Harvest Information November 15 th MDA Responsibilities Checklist sent to NRCS county office confirming requirements met (mid December) Farmer and Crop Consultant receives individual site results (late December) Overall results tabulated and copies sent out to farmers, crop consultants, & NRCS staff (early to mid January)
33 2011 Nutrient Management Initiative Results Nitrogen Rate Comparison County Waseca Previous Crop Soybeans Soil Test Information Township Woodville History New Site Texture clay loam Tillage System Fall Chisel & Spring Tillage O.M.% 4 Irrigated Planting Date Row width Population Hybrid/Variety ph 6.3 No 5/6/ ,400 DeKalb DKC52-59 Buffer ph 6.7 Pesticide: Roundup + Callisto-Atrazine PhosBray ppm 14 Rate 32 oz oz+1# Phos Olsen ppm 0 Harvest Date 10/11/2011Comments: Pottasium ppm 113 Treatment A--(low rate)*(1) Total Plant Food Per Acre Economic Evaluation Report Nutrient Source Cost per ton Rate lbs./acre Application Date Timing/ Placement Applied on N Check N total lbs./a P2O5 total lbs./a K2O total lbs./a Sulfur Zinc $ /04/11 Pre-Plant Bnd No $ gallons 05/06/11 Starter Yes $ /05/10 Fall Brdcst Yes $ /05/10 Fall Brdcst Yes Nitrogen Stabilizer Used? No TPF/Acre Treatment B--(high rate)*(2) Total Plant Food Per Acre Nutrient Source Cost per ton Rate lbs./acre Application Date Timing/ Placement Applied on N Check N total lbs./a P2O5 total lbs./a K2O total lbs./a Sulfur Zinc $ /4/2011 Pre-Plant Bnd No $ gallons 5/6/2011 Starter Yes $ /5/2010 Fall Brdcst Yes $ /5/2010 Fall Brdcst Yes Nitrogen Stabilizer Used? No TPF/Acre Yield Results Weighing Method Weigh Wagon Strip Number Total N Harvested Length in Feet Row Width Inches # of Rows Harvested % Moisture Test Weight Harvest Weight Adjusted 15% Stalk Nitrate Results Yield Averages Check Check Ave Treatment A (low) Treatment B (high) Check Nitrogen Cost per lb. of actual N 0.32 *Based on farmers actual costs & predominant nitrogen source Nitrogen to Corn Price* Ratio 0.05 University of Mn. Rate Guidelines Corn price based on $6.22 per bushel--results from Marshall and Red Wing MN Cash Price average 11/1/10 to 11/1/11 Additional Cost for 30lbs. of N per acre $9.60 Yield Difference from Additional N bushels/acre or -$8.18 Net Return from Additional N per $6.22/bu ($17.78) Sent to Participating Farmer and Crop Consultant
34
35 Economic Response to Increased N Rates ($/Ac) 2011 Nutrient Management Results $200 $ Sites y = x R² = $100 Break Even 3.0 Bushels/A $50 $ ($50) ($100) Yield Response to Increased N Rates (Bu/Ac)
36 Economic Response to Increased N Rate ($/Ac) $200 $150 $ Nutrient Management Sites 177 Locations Break Even 3.95 Bushels/A y = x R² = $50 $ $50 -$100 Yield Response to Increased N Rate (Bu/Ac)
37 100% 80% 60% 40% Yield Advantage from Higher N Comparison 100% 100% 85% 80% 84% 78% 75% 79% 75% 60% 68% 66% 56% 43% 20% 0% Yr. Ave. Corn following Soybean Corn following Corn
38 Yield Response (bu/ac) Yield Response from Additional N 106 sites corn/soybean, Avg low N rate = 120 lb N/ac, Avg yield 189 bu./ac Avg high N rate = 156 lb N/ac, Avg yield 196 bu/ac 5 year avg. for applying extra N = 5.6 bu/ac
39 Yield Response (bu/ac) Yield Response from Additional N corn/corn, Avg low N rate = 159 lb N/ac, Avg yield 174 bu./ac Avg high N rate = 198 lb N/ac, Avg yield 179 bu/ac 5 year avg. for applying extra N = 3.7 bu/ac sites 6.1
40 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Economic Advantage from Higher N Comparison 56% 33% 78% 25% 58% 56% 40% 56% 50% 38% 32% 54% 55% Yr. Ave. Corn following Soybeans 177 Sites Corn following Corn 41%
41 Net Return ($/ac) Net Return from Additional N corn/soybean, $200 $150 Avg low N rate = 120 lb N/ac, Avg yield 189 bu./ac Avg high N rate = 156 lb N/ac, Avg yield 196 bu/ac $100 $50 $13.76 $4.16 $6.91 $7.24 $(6.59) $0 -$50 -$ year avg. for applying extra N = $5.10/ac
42 Net Return ($/ac) Net Return from Additional N corn/corn, $200 $150 Avg low N rate = 159 lb N/ac, Avg yield 174 bu./ac Avg high N rate = 198 lb N/ac, Avg yield 179 bu/ac $100 $50 $0 -$50 -$100 $(3.08) $20.08 $(5.82) $(3.52) $(0.45) year avg. for higher N comparisons=$1.44/ac
43 Basal Stalk Nitrate Test-Late Season N Evaluation BSNT Interpretation < 250=Deficient =Marginal =Optimal >2000+ Excessive
44 25% 20% 15% BSNT (Low Apps v.s. High Rates) 2011 soybean/corn 21% 19% 104 Samples 16% 13% 10% 9% 8% 8% 6% 5% 0% Excessive Optimum Marginal Low Low Rate Apps High Rate Apps
45 40% 30% BSNT (Low Apps v.s. High Apps) 2011 corn/corn 36% 31% 61 Samples 20% 10% 5% 8% 7% 5% 7% 2% 0% Excessive Optimum Marginal Low LowRate Apps High Rate Apps
46 N Test Basal Rate Moist. Wt. Yield Stalk Check Treatment A (low) Treatment B (high) v.s. 206 lbs. total N Spring applied NH3
47 Corn following Corn Fall DAP, Pot, ZN Starter Side Dress NH3 135 v.s. 165 total N Check Ave Treatment A (low) Treatment B (high)
48 Conclusions Higher yield does not always mean greater return from additional N SB/C 84% of sites had a yield advantage 55% of sites had an economic advantage C/C 66% of sites yield advantage 41% of sites had and economic advantage New genetics are becoming much more efficient SB/C pounds of N to produce bushel C/C pounds of N to produce a bushel Organic matter contribution Check strips many times 70% of overall yield. Increased emphasis on water quality. Must be more conscious about nutrient losses. Wellhead protection areas, impaired waters, Hypoxia
49 City of Verndale Wellhead Protection Area Project
50 Verndale Drinking Water Supply Management Area NMI test plots BMP test plots
51 Lysimeter Installation Bucket auger holes for lysimeters - 2 ft below trench Trench runs are 2-feet deep Hole at bottom of the trench (4 ft Total) Pushing lysimeter into hole and silica mix Mixing silica flour & coating ceramic tips Ready for PVC
52 Sample lines kept below ground surface out of way of farmer
53 NMI strips Long-term lysimeters installed
54 Verndale WHPA Lysimeter Install Private Producer Land: N Rate Trials/WQ Monitoring Illustration by Ryan Lemickson, MDA Nitrogen application rate comparison trials (NMI Program) Sample port Sample port
55 Cross section of nitrogen rates Illustration by Ryan Lemickson, MDA Sample port
56 Purging lysimeter water by hand pump ~ i.e. sampling Staff from MDA, MN Rural Water, and Wadena SWCD took turns sampling all summer and fall.
57 NO3-N (mg/l) 60 V5 SD Verndale Lysimeter NO3-N (mg/l), lb rate lb Rate 40 Zero N V10 SD 0 5/5 5/25 6/14 7/4 7/24 8/13 9/2 9/22 10/12 11/1 Date
58 Corn Yield Results Strip Number Total N Harvested Length in Feet Row Width Inches # of Row s Harvested % Moisture Test Weight Harvest Weight Adjusted 15% Stalk Nitrate Results Yield Averages Check Check Ave Treatment A (low) Treatment B (high) Check Nitrogen Cost per lb. of actual N 0.53 Nitrogen to Corn Price* Ratio 0.08 University of Mn. Rate Guidelines *Based on farmers actual costs & predominant nitrogen source Additional Cost for 30 lbs. of N per acre $15.90 Yield Difference from Additional N bushels/acre or -$10.80 Net Return from Additional N per $6.22/bu ($26.70)
59 Education Outreach Activities Fall Nutrient Newsletter Nutrient Conference Jackpot Junction Morton Feb15, 2012 Direct mailers to crop consultants & farmers Press Releases News articles Meetings Crop Consultants Farmers Dealers
60
Minnesota Nutrient Management Initiative. On-Farm Evaluation of Nitrogen and Phosphorous Nutrient Management
Minnesota Nutrient Management Initiative On-Farm Evaluation of Nitrogen and Phosphorous Nutrient Management Nutrient Management Initiative On Farm Evaluation Sponsored by USDA-NRCS in collaboration with
More informationSt. Peter Wellhead Protection
St. Peter Wellhead Protection Nitrogen Rate Results October 2003 A Demonstration Project Funded Through Section 319 of the Federal Clean Water Act Page 1 How much nitrogen should be applied to a corn crop
More informationSt. Peter Wellhead Protection
St. Peter Wellhead Protection Nitrogen Rate Results September 2003 A Demonstration Project Funded Through Section 319 of the Federal Clean Water Act Page 1 You farm and/or own land within the St. Peter
More informationRESEARCH. AFREC Research Projects. htm
RESEARCH AFREC Research Projects MDA Drainage Demonstration s http://www.mda.state.mn.us/chemicals/fertilizers/afrec. htm http://www.mda.state.mn.us/protecting/bmps/drainage demos.htm Advancing Improved
More informationFertilizer Placement Options Demonstration
Fertilizer Placement Options Demonstration -- UNL South Central Agricultural Laboratory -- Final Report, Jan. 21 Glen P. Slater Richard B. Ferguson Rationale Nebraska corn producers continually strive
More informationObjectives: Background:
Effects of Spring Incorporated Liquid Dairy Manure Versus Spring Surface Applications and the Role of Starter Fertilizer on Nitrogen Utilization, Residue Management and No-Till Corn Yields in Northeast
More informationTop Strip-Till Practices for Corn and Soybean
Top Strip-Till Practices for Corn and Soybean Tony J. Vyn Agronomy Department, Purdue University RTK-guided Strip Tillage for Corn after Soybean Berms after Soybean Harvest and Fall Strip-Till Berm Heights
More informationInstitute of Ag Professionals
Institute of Ag Professionals Proceedings of the 2014 Crop Pest Management Shortcourse & Minnesota Crop Production Retailers Association Trade Show www.extension.umn.edu/agprofessionals Do not reproduce
More informationPhosphorus: You have choices! Charles Shapiro Soil Scientist Crop Nutrition
Phosphorus: You have choices! Charles Shapiro Soil Scientist Crop Nutrition Ag PhD 3 4 From: Can I Cut Fertilizer Rates (January 2017), Brian Hefty How can I better invest my fertilizer
More informationReviewing Manure Management Plans - FAQ
Reviewing Manure Management Plans - FAQ Regional Division Feedlot Program Contents: Manure storage... 2 Field locations... 3 Nutrient management.. 5 Sensitive areas... 6 Checklist... 8 MPCA Area Offices
More informationFIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY
115 Personnel: Location: Supported By: J. G. Lauer, J.M. Gaska, K. D. Kohn, J.T. Hopf Arlington, WI HATCH FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Title: Tillage in Corn and Soybean Production Systems Experiment: 17Tillage
More informationSoil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility. Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE
Soil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE www.wardlab.com Purposes of Soil Quality Employ new & modified crop management systems Increase efficiency
More informationEnhancing Continuous Corn Production Under High Residue Conditions with Starter Fluid Fertilizer Combinations and Placement
Enhancing Continuous Corn Production Under High Residue Conditions with Starter Fluid Fertilizer Combinations and Placement Jeff Vetsch Univ. of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center 2011 Fluid
More informationLincoln County Verdi Township Spring Creek Watershed Survey
D:\fanmap\mda\verdi\data\report\report1.doc Date of last update 6/2/98 Printing date-1/11/02 Lincoln County Verdi Township Spring Creek Watershed Survey For additional information, contact: Denton Bruening
More informationCROP NUTRIENTS FOR EVER-INCREASING YIELDS ARE CURRENT FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS ADEQUATE?
CROP NUTRIENTS FOR EVER-INCREASING YIELDS ARE CURRENT FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS ADEQUATE? Gyles Randall Southern Research and Outreach Center University of Minnesota, Waseca, MN Crop yields, especially
More informationShould I be Concerned About High Soil Test Levels on my Farm?
Should I be Concerned About High Soil Test Levels on my Farm? Ohio Swine Symposium, February 11, 2015 Greg LaBarge, Field Specialist Agronomic Systems Ohio State University Extension labarge.1@osu.edu
More informationCorn Belt N Guidelines John A. Lamb University of Minnesota
Corn Belt N Guidelines John A. Lamb University of Minnesota Outline Where have we been? Where are we now? Where are we going? UM N Recs--Trends N Rec. Factors 1971 1986 1999 ---Lb N/acre--- C-C, OM (H),160
More informationSummary of Water Monitoring Data
Clay County Drainage Site Summary of Water Monitoring Data 2011 2015 Introduction The Red River Valley in northwestern Minnesota is experiencing an increase in the amount of agricultural subsurface drainage
More informationFinal Post Conference Report (Published April 19, 2012)
2011 Growing Season Final Post Conference Report (Published April 19, 2012) at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Agricultural Research & Development Center Near Mead, Nebraska For more information, call
More informationOptimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era
Optimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era Tony J. Vyn Agronomy Department, Purdue University Abstract Recent developments in biofuel demand and the rapid adoption of modern
More informationGyles Randall Soil Scientist & Professor (Emeritus) Univ. of Minnesota
Managing P & K for Corn and Soybeans Short and Long-term Decisions Gyles Randall Soil Scientist & Professor (Emeritus) Univ. of Minnesota AGVISE Seminar Series Jan. 6, 7 & 8, 2015 Currently, how do you
More informationCorn Responds Positively to Rate & Timing of Environmentally Smart Nitrogen (ESN) & Urea
Corn Responds Positively to Rate & Timing of Environmentally Smart Nitrogen (ESN) & Urea Cooperator: Smith Farm (Clay, Terry) Investigator: Dr. Morteza Mozaffari/Allen Davis Location: Greene County - Walcott
More informationFERTILIZER PLACEMENT OPTIONS FOR IRRIGATED NO-TILL CORN 2005 THE DAKOTA LAKES STAFF
FERTILIZER PLACEMENT OPTIONS FOR IRRIGATED NO-TILL CORN 2005 THE DAKOTA LAKES STAFF INTRODUCTION: Fertilizer placement and timing remains one of the most discussed factors in agriculture. Terms such as
More informationTillage Systems and Soil Conservation for Corn-on-Corn. Tony J. Vyn, assisted by colleagues, graduate students, technicians, and farmers
Tillage Systems and Soil Conservation for Corn-on-Corn Tony J. Vyn, assisted by colleagues, graduate students, technicians, and farmers Ratio of Corn to Soybean Acres (2005) Source: G. Shnitkey, Univ.
More informationA Partial Budget Approach to Economic Decisions: Key Biomass Contract Issues. Benefits Less Costs = Profitability. Benefits
2009 Kansas Wheat District Seminars A Decision Making Model for Cellulosic Biomass Contracts What to Consider with Cellulosic Biomass Harvest Daniel O Brien O & Troy Dumler Extension Agricultural Economists
More informationOptimizing rate of nitrogen for corn - how good can it be?
Optimizing rate of nitrogen for corn - how good can it be? James J. Camberato www.soilfertility.info jcambera@purdue.edu Objective of better N management Choose a combination of source, placement, timing,
More informationVariable Rate Starter Fertilization Based on Soil Attributes
Variable Rate Starter Fertilization Based on Soil Attributes Jeffrey Vetsch and Dr. Daniel Kaiser Univ. of Minnesota Fluid Fertilizer Forum, Scottsdale, AZ February, 15 and 16, 2016 Justification A fluid
More informationDiscovery Farms Minnesota N and P, what is happened in Farm Fields? Jerome Lensing January 9, 10, 11, 2018 AgVise Labs
Discovery Farms Minnesota N and P, what is happened in Farm Fields? Jerome Lensing January 9, 10, 11, 2018 AgVise Labs Jerome.lensing@hotmail.com Discovery Farms is a farmer led water quality research
More informationChapter 7.2. AFFIRM and Alberta MMP Software. learning objectives
AFFIRM and Alberta MMP Software learning objectives Identify information required to use the Alberta Farm Fertilizer Information and Recommendation Manager (AFFIRM). Identify information required to use
More informationOptimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era
Optimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era Tony J. Vyn Agronomy Department, Purdue University Abstract: Recent developments in biofuel demand and the rapid adoption of modern
More informationEVALUATION OF REDUCED APPLICATION RATES OF ACETOCHLOR TO REDUCE CONCENTRATION IN TILE DRAINAGE WATER
EVALUATION OF REDUCED APPLICATION RATES OF ACETOCHLOR TO REDUCE CONCENTRATION IN TILE DRAINAGE WATER Semi-annual Report #6 Covering the time period of July 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 Report prepared
More informationDraft Nitrogen Fertilizer Rule
Draft Nitrogen Fertilizer Rule Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division www.mda.state.mn.us/nfr Agenda Draft Nitrogen Fertilizer Rule Listening Session Background and Overview Dan Stoddard What are
More informationBest Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA
N Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA B E S T M A N AG E M E N T P R AC T I C E S F O R N I T R O G E N A P P L I C AT I O N Best Management Practices
More informationCENTRAL PLATTE NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT NITROGEN MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION TEST
CENTRAL PLATTE NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT NITROGEN MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION TEST NAME: CERT #: ADDRESS: CITY: Section A: The Nitrate Contamination Concern 1) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s
More informationVariable Rate Starter Fertilization Based on Soil Attributes
Variable Rate Starter Fertilization Based on Soil Attributes Jeffrey Vetsch and Dr. Daniel Kaiser University of Minnesota Annual Report, February 2015 Introduction Starter fertilizers containing phosphorus
More informationNitrate, Well Testing and Rules
Nitrate, Well Testing and Rules Where is all this heading? February 7, 2017 Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division Minnesota Department of Agriculture Outline Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Plan
More informationCorn Variety Trial 2012, Pershing County
Special Publication-13-02 Corn Variety Trial 2012, Pershing County Stephen S. Foster, UNCE Extension Educator, Pershing County Jay Davison, UNCE Alternative Crop/Forage Specialist Introduction Alfalfa
More informationNitrogen and Pesticide Use
On behalf of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, thank you for the Pomme de Terre 1W1P notification letter. We appreciate the invitation to submit water management issues and concerns. As a first
More informationSoil Nitrate Tests in Maryland PSNT and FSNT Heather Hutchinson September 12, 2013
Soil Nitrate Tests in Maryland PSNT and FSNT Heather Hutchinson September 12, 2013 What is the PSNT? a tool that helps you decide whether to apply sidedress nitrogen to corn measures amount of nitrate-nitrogen
More informationWestern Illinois University/ Allison Organic Research Farm Organic Dry Blended Fertilizer Study in Corn
Western Illinois University/ Allison Organic Research Farm Organic Dry Blended Fertilizer Study in Corn Joel Gruver and Andrew Clayton While most organic farmers use bulky and somewhat heterogeneous materials
More informationStrip-till Research Results: Rotation, Automatic Guidance, and Fertilizer Placement. Tony J. Vyn & Graduate Students, Colleagues & Farmers
Strip-till Research Results: Rotation, Automatic Guidance, and Fertilizer Placement Tony J. Vyn & Graduate Students, Colleagues & Farmers Berms after Soybean Harvest Berm Heights in Spring after Successful
More informationSulfur Use in Western MN, What We Know and What We Don t
Sulfur Use in Western MN, What We Know and What We Don t Daniel Kaiser Associate Professor Department of Soil, Water and Climate U of M Twin Cities 612-624-3482 dekaiser@umn.edu 2018 Agvise Soil Fertility
More informationThe Phosphorus Management Tool
The Phosphorus Management Tool Heather Hutchinson Nutrient Management Specialist June 18, 2013 Understanding Phosphorus Why are soils high in phosphorus? Why is phosphorus a problem? How is phosphorus
More informationCORN & SOYBEAN AGRONOMY UPDATES. Angela McClure December 2015
CORN & SOYBEAN AGRONOMY UPDATES Angela McClure December 2015 New Publications/Resources SP781; 2015 Grain Sorghum Quick Facts; printed and on utcrops.com How to submit a meeting for CCA points (John Wilson)
More informationUsing Cover Crops to Reduce Leaching. Losses of Nitrate
Using Cover Crops to Reduce Leaching USDA-ARS National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment Ames, Iowa Tom Kaspar, Ben Knutson, Keith Kohler, Kent Heikens, Dan Jaynes, Tim Parkin, Tom Moorman,
More informationSoil Fertility Briefs. Carrie Laboski & John Peters Soil Science Department University of Wisconsin-Madison
Soil Fertility Briefs Carrie Laboski & John Peters Soil Science Department University of Wisconsin-Madison Using the remote responders Push button corresponding to your answer When green light flashes
More informationUsing the Pre-Sidedress Soil Nitrate Test (PSNT)
Using the Pre-Sidedress Soil Nitrate Test (PSNT) What is the PSNT? a tool that helps you decide whether to apply sidedress nitrogen to corn measures amount of nitrate-nitrogen in soil just before rapid
More informationNitrogen Management Tools for Reducing Nitrogen losses in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
Nitrogen Management Tools for Reducing Nitrogen losses in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed John (Jack) Meisinger Soil Scientist, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD Adj. Assoc. Prof, Unv. Md, College Pk, MD Principles
More informationBased on these results, is switching to a soil applied insecticide a profitable decision?
AAE 320 Problem Set #1 Name: Due September 21, 2018 1) You plant 500 acres of corn every year. Because seed prices have gotten high, especially for the best biotech traits, you are considering reducing
More informationNitrogen Fertilization for Corn
Nitrogen Fertilization for Corn............................... John Heard CCA, Crops Recent corn yields higher and stable 2011-2015 4R Nutrient Stewardship Right rates Right sources Right placement Right
More informationFall Forage Mixture for Grass Finishing Livestock Late in the Fall
38 Livestock Salzer Principal Investigator Troy Salzer 3457 Sandy Lake Rd. Barnum, MN 55707 218-384-3511 salze003@umn.edu Carlton County Project Duration 2010 to 2012 Award Amount $10,000 Staff Contact
More information2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial ROW WIDTHS
2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial ROW WIDTHS Shaun Casteel, Extension Soybean Specialist, Purdue Agronomy scasteel@purdue.edu, 765.494.0895 OVERVIEW This protocol describes the design and conduct of on-farm,
More informationA Toolbox for Water Management. By Nick Schneider, Winnebago County Ag Agent and Doral Kemper
A Toolbox for Water Management By Nick Schneider, Winnebago County Ag Agent and Doral Kemper On-Farm Bioreactors by Madeline Fisher, Crops and Soils, Nov-Dec 2010 AKA: Denitrifying biofilter reactors Removes
More informationIrrigated Spring Wheat
Southern Idaho Fertilizer Guide Irrigated Spring Wheat Brad Brown, Jeffrey Stark, and Dale Westermann These fertilizer guidelines are based on relationships established between University of Idaho soil
More informationCost-Effective N Management Using Reduced Rates of Polymer Coated Urea in Corn
Cost-Effective N Management Using Reduced Rates of Polymer Coated Urea in Corn Kelly Nelson, Div. of Plant Sciences, Univ. of Missouri, Novelty, MO Peter Motavalli, Dept. of Soil, Environ., and Atmos.
More informationNitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana
Purdue University Department of Agronomy Applied Crop Research Update Updated March 2017 URL: http://www.kingcorn.org/news/timeless/nitrogenmgmt.pdf Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana Jim
More informationTo 4R or Not to 4R Is There an Option?
To 4R or Not to 4R Is There an Option? August 3, 2014 Setting the Stage for 4R Nutrient Stewardship in Ontario Phosphorus in the Great Lakes with the focus on the western basin of Lake Erie. Multiple Point
More informationAGRONOMY 375 EXAM II. November 7, There are 15 questions (plus a bonus question) worth a total of up to 100 points possible. Please be concise.
Name AGRONOMY 375 EXAM II November 7, 2008 There are 15 questions (plus a bonus question) worth a total of up to 100 points possible. Please be concise. 4 pts. 1. Please note two crop management strategies
More informationComparison of Phosphorus and Nitrogen Loss in Surface Runoff versus Tile Flow in Wisconsin Tile Drained Landscapes
Comparison of Phosphorus and Nitrogen Loss in Surface Runoff versus Tile Flow in Wisconsin Tile Drained Landscapes Eric Cooley Research Coordinator UW Discovery Farms What Are Discovery Farms? The Discovery
More informationNutrient Management in Crop Production
Nutrient Management in Crop Production Dr. John E. Sawyer Associate Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Focus On Agriculture Water Quality Hypoxia Pfiesteria piscicida Nitrate Tile Flow Sediment
More informationFIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY
126 FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Title: Corn response to XiteBio plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Experiment: 11Biologicals Year: 2016 Personnel: J. G. Lauer, K. D. Kohn, T. H. Diallo Trial ID: 6130 Location:
More information1. Potassium deficiency in corn and soybeans 1 2. Residue treatment in continuous no-till wheat systems 3
Number 61 December 15, 2006 1. Potassium deficiency in corn and soybeans 1 2. Residue treatment in continuous no-till wheat systems 3 1. Potassium deficiency in corn and soybeans We have been seeing a
More informationCover Crops and Nitrogen in Water
Cover Crops and Nitrogen in Water Minnesota Nutrient Management Conference Morton, MN February 9, 2016 USDA-ARS National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment Ames, Iowa Tom Kaspar Ben Knutson
More informationReduced Tillage Fertilizer Management. Bill Verbeten NWNY Dairy, Livestock, & Field Crops Team
Reduced Tillage Fertilizer Management Bill Verbeten NWNY Dairy, Livestock, & Field Crops Team 2 Take Home Points Fertilizer placement is the main tool to manage crop fertility in reduced tillage systems
More informationCORN & SOYBEAN AGRONOMIC UPDATES. Angela McClure December 2014
CORN & SOYBEAN AGRONOMIC UPDATES Angela McClure December 2014 2014 at a glance.. 880,000 acres corn harvested; 168 bu/a 1.58 million acres soybean harvested; 46 bu/a 475,00 acres wheat harvested; 66 bu/a
More informationResults from On-farm N Rate Response Trials. Larry G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science University of Wisconsin
Results from On-farm N Rate Response Trials Larry G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science University of Wisconsin Questions? Are N rate recommendations too low? High yield producers use higher rates. Are yields
More informationClovers.. 75 pounds of "N" per acre
Fertilizer Guideline by Don "Moe" Moeller, Sales Agronomist Much of the contained information is from the "WARDguide" NITROGEN. (N) Estimated amounts of Nitrogen available from past legume plants: Alfalfa..
More informationEffect of a rye cover crop and crop residue removal on corn nitrogen fertilization
2011 Integrated Crop Management Conference - Iowa State University 115 Effect of a rye cover crop and crop residue removal on corn nitrogen fertilization John E. Sawyer, professor, Agronomy, Iowa State
More information2017 Crop Demonstrations and Research Trials St. Francis County
2017 Crop Demonstrations and Research Trials St. Francis County St. Francis County Cooperative Extension Service Agent: Cody Griffin CEA- Staff Chair Cooperator: Chris Roberts Location: 35.1310760, -90.5648350
More informationOn-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota in 2010 and 2011 Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter
On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota in 2010 and 2011 Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Growers are continually striving to increase corn yield
More informationPurdue On-Farm Nitrogen Rate Trial Protocol
- 1 - Purdue On-Farm Nitrogen Rate Trial Protocol Bob Nielsen (rnielsen@purdue.edu, 765-494-4802) and Jim Camberato (jcambera@purdue.edu, 765-496-9338), Purdue Agronomy This protocol describes the design
More information2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial SEEDING RATES
2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial SEEDING RATES Shaun Casteel, Extension Soybean Specialist, Purdue Agronomy scasteel@purdue.edu, 765.494.0895 www.soybeanstation.org OVERVIEW This protocol describes the
More informationOn-Farm Corn and Soybean Fertilizer Demonstration Trials
On-Farm Corn and Soybean Fertilizer Demonstration Trials RFR-A1733 Jim Fawcett, extension field agronomist (retired) Andrew Weaver, Northwest Farm, ag specialist Jim Rogers, Armstrong Farm, ag specialist
More informationEvaluation of Grain Sorghum Hybrid Varieties in Dryland Farming Conditions in Nueces County
Evaluation of Grain Sorghum Hybrid Varieties in Dryland Farming Conditions in Nueces County Ordner Farms 2002 NUECES COUNTY Harvey L. Buehring and Michael W. Potter County Extension Agent-Ag., Demonstration
More informationBest Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTH-CENTRAL MINNESOTA
N Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTH-CENTRAL MINNESOTA B E S T M A N AG E M E N T P R AC T I C E S F O R N I T R O G E N A P P L I C AT I O N Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use
More informationAgronomic rate for biosolids application to cropland. Andy Bary Soil Scientist Crop & Soil Science Washington State University Puyallup
Agronomic rate for biosolids application to cropland Andy Bary Soil Scientist Crop & Soil Science Washington State University Puyallup PNW 511 On the web http://soils.puyallup.wsu.edu/biosolids/ NOTE:
More informationNitrates in Groundwater- Filtering Out the Facts. Bruce Montgomery
Nitrates in Groundwater- Filtering Out the Facts MN Agriculture and Nitrates Forum July 25, 2012 Rochester, Minnesota Bruce Montgomery MN Department of Agriculture Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Plan Review
More informationBEST PRACTICES FOR MANAGING NITROGEN IN NO-TILL
BEST PRACTICES FOR MANAGING NITROGEN IN NO-TILL Lloyd Murdock University of Kentucky January 11, 2012 ABSOLUTELY BEST PRACTICE FOR MOST CROPS AND PLACES 1. Split N with a portion early in life cycle and
More informationBetween a Rock and a. Hard Place. Corn Profitability
Corn Profitability Between a Rock and a Image source: http://www.thrivewithsimon.co.uk Hard Place RL (Bob) Nielsen Extension Corn Specialist Purdue Agronomy 765.494.4802 rnielsen@purdue.edu @PurdueCornGuy
More informationNUTRIENT MANAGEMENT (ac.) CODE 590
IG-590-1 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE INSTALLATION GUIDELINES NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT (ac.) CODE 590 GUIDELINES APPLICABLE FOR ALL PURPOSES Nutrient management activities shall
More informationTillage and Fertility Opportunities and Challenges. Dick Wolkowski Department of Soil Science UW-Madison
Tillage and Fertility Opportunities and Challenges Dick Wolkowski Department of Soil Science UW-Madison rpwolkow@wisc.edu Today s potpourri of issues Vertical tillage/subsoiling Crop residue management
More informationUtilizing farmers changed nitrogen application technologies to demonstrate improved nutrient management practices year 2
Final Report 215 Objectives and Hypothesis In year two, we continue working with farmers to obtain data on their nitrogen management changes. We looked at four N management systems, each impacting one
More informationPrecision Ag. Back to Basics
Precision Ag Back to Basics Nicole Rabe (Land Resource Specialist OMAFRA) Mike Wilson (CCA-ON, Advanced Agronomy Solutions Manager - Thompsons Limited) What is Precision Agriculture a management system
More informationIS FALL TILLAGE FOLLOWING SOYBEAN HARVEST NECESSARY? 1/
IS FALL TILLAGE FOLLOWING SOYBEAN HARVEST NECESSARY? / Introduction As growers look for opportunities to enhance profit margins, the need for fall tillage following soybean harvest is questioned. Although
More informationRecent trends in nitrogen fertilizer and water use in irrigated corn
Section B Recent trends in nitrogen fertilizer and water use in irrigated corn Water, nitrogen, and corn yields Water plays a crucial role in the life of plants. Of all the resources that plants need to
More informationCalculating Crop Nutrient Value From Irrigation Water Inputs: A Survey of Southeast Missouri Irrigation
University of Missouri Extension WQ278, Reviewed January 2009 Calculating Crop Nutrient Value From Irrigation Water Inputs: A Survey of Southeast Missouri Irrigation Paul Tracy and S.G. Hefner Department
More informationOn-Farm Comparison Results Mulliken
Years: 2001-2002, 2004-2010 Title: Profitability of Incorporating Lime Crop: Soybean/Corn Rotation NSFGPP Operator: Jerry, Dodge County Private Industry Cooperator: Jerry Objective: To determine & document
More informationKapil Arora, Carl Pederson, Dr. Matt Helmers, and Dr. Ramesh Kanwar. DATE SUBMITTED: October 23, INDUSTRY SUMMARY
TITLE: Evaluating Nutrient (nitrogen and ortho-phosphate) Export with Subsurface Drainage Water from Spring Applied Swine Manure to Soybean Planted Micro-watersheds - NPB #12-117 INVESTIGATORS: INSTITUTION:
More informationFIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY
51 Title: Personnel: Location: Supported By: UW Corn Trials - Private Silage J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn, and T. Diallo Chippewa Falls, WI AgReliant Genetics, LLC FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Experiment: 01STPrivate
More informationNutrient Management in Field Crops MSU Fertilizer Recommendations Crop*A*Syst 2015 Nutrient Management Training
Nutrient Management in Field Crops MSU Fertilizer Recommendations Crop*A*Syst 2015 Nutrient Management Training George Silva - silvag@msu.edu Eaton, Ingham, Barry and Livingston Counties 17 Essential Plant
More informationThe value of proper soil testing and use in precision Ag
The value of proper soil testing and use in precision Ag Dorivar Ruiz Diaz Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State University Overview Long term corn yield response and P removal with fertilizer placement. Soil
More informationEXAMPLE QUESTIONS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION EXAM
Department of Environmental Science and Technology EXAMPLE QUESTIONS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION EXAM NOTE: The following questions were developed based on several of the knowledge areas for the
More informationAgricultural Chemicals and Groundwater Protection
Economic Considerations of Nutrient Management BMPs Concern about nutrients from fertilizers and manure degrading water supplies has resulted in a search for nutrient management approaches that protect
More informationTOPDRESSING NITROGEN AS UAN NEAR THE BOOT GROWTH STAGE PI: Dr. Joel Ransom
TOPDRESSING NITROGEN AS UAN NEAR THE BOOT GROWTH STAGE PI: Dr. Joel Ransom INTRODUCTION Does it pay to add N in-season in wheat or do you stick with one application pre-plant? There is a stigma with growing
More informationPrecision Nitrogen Management of Corn
Precision Nitrogen Management of Corn Adaptive N management: Fine-tuning Nitrogen Management for Corn Field by field, year by year Quirine M. Ketterings, Patty Ristow, and Karl Czymmek Cornell University
More informationNNY Agricultural Development Program Project Report
NNY Agricultural Development Program 26-27 Project Report Precise Nitrogen Management for Corn Production Project Leader(s): Jeff Melkonian; Crop & Soil Sciences, Cornell University, Harold van Es. Crop
More informationTRI-STATE FERTILIZER UPDATE
TRI-STATE FERTILIZER UPDATE Steve Culman (and many, many others) Ohio State University School of Environment and Natural Resources culman.2@osu.edu soilfertility.osu.edu Tri-State Recommendations Originally
More informationResponse of DEKALB Brand Corn Products to Planting Population and Nitrogen Fertility
Response of DEKALB Brand Corn Products to Planting Population and Nitrogen Fertility 2017 Learning Center Demo Report Monsanto Learning Center at Scott, MS BACKGROUND This trial was conducted to measure
More informationStarter Fertilizer for Corn in Vermont
Starter Fertilizer for Corn in Vermont By Bill Jokela, Extension Soils Specialist, University of Vermont Extension The Basics of Starter Fertilizer What is starter fertilizer? Starter fertilizer refers
More informationPutting Research to Work on the Farm. Dr. Grant Mehring: Research Director Lauren Proulx: On-Farm Research Coordinator & Agronomist
Putting Research to Work on the Farm Update on the Network, 2016 Results, and 2017 Priority Areas Dr. Grant Mehring: Research Director Lauren Proulx: On-Farm Research Coordinator & Agronomist Twitter Pacific
More information