IEEE-SA P2020. Kick-Off Meeting. 20 September 2016, AutoWorld, Brussels, Belgium

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "IEEE-SA P2020. Kick-Off Meeting. 20 September 2016, AutoWorld, Brussels, Belgium"

Maude Jemima Carpenter
6 years ago
Views:

1 IEEE-SA P2020 Kick-Off Meeting 20 September 2016, AutoWorld, Brussels, Belgium

2 Agenda Call to Order & Introductions Robert Stead Scope and Purpose of Working Group Robert Stead IEEE Patent Policy Michael Kipness Approval of Working Group P&Ps Robert Stead and Michael Kipness Appointment of Officers Robert Stead Technical Discussion Sven Fleck Adjourn

3 Introductions Robert Stead, Sense Media Group Benjamin May, AMX13 Sven Fleck, SmartSurv Patrick Denny, Valeo Vision Systems Michael Kipness, IEEE-SA CPIQ WG members

4 Affiliation Declarations Name Job title Declaration of which entity is supporting your participation in this working group (company, individual or other organisation)

5 PAR Summary Sponsoring Society and Committee: IEEE Vehicular Technology Society/Intelligent Transportation Systems (VT/ITS) PAR link: Project information: Contact Information for IEEE-SA Liaison Name: Michael Kipness Address: Phone: Contact Information for Standards Representative Name: Thomas Kurihara Address:

6 Scope of PAR This standard addresses the fundamental attributes that contribute to image and quality for automotive Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) applications, as well as identifying existing metrics and other useful information relating to these attributes. It defines a standardized suite of objective and subjective test methods for measuring automotive camera image quality attributes, and it specifies tools and test methods to facilitate standards-based communication and comparison among OEM and Tier 1 system integrators and component vendors regarding automotive ADAS image quality.

7 Purpose of the PAR Purpose: This standard specifies methods and metrics for measuring and testing automotive image quality to ensure consistency and create cross-industry reference points. Need for the Project: Cameras are being used in greater numbers in automotive applications. Most of these systems have been developed independently, with no standardised calibration or measurement of image quality. Consumers have no standard reference point when using camera enabled systems, and OEM/Tier 1 developers cannot compare camera systems side by side. Stakeholders for the Standard: Automotive OEMs, Automotive Tier 1 suppliers, image processing software and hardware companies, optics companies, sensor manufacturers, safety certification

8 Today s Meeting and General Expectations See Q4 & Q7 on survey for details Define standard terminology, test methods and KPIs Industry collaboration across supply chain Increase knowledge transfer and harmonisation Define scope, roles and responsibilities Meet the other participants Establish sub-groups and objectives

9 IEEE Patent Policy MK slides

10 P2020 Policies and Procedures Review of document Q&A

11 Appointment of P2020 Officers Chair Vice Chair Secretary Treasurer Robert Stead Dr. Sven Fleck Benjamin May Prof. Patrick Denny

12 Technical Discussion Review of survey results Response to proposed work packages New packages proposed Draft Outline review and feedback Establishment of work packages Include / exclude in P2020 Proposal and nomination of work package leaders Goals of work package group

13 Example of work packet aims Definitions of relevant terms Review of existing relevant standards Review of existing relevant technical studies Definition of proposed standard test / method / KPI / measurement Objective measurement outcomes

14 Next meetings? Teleconference 6 weeks? Finalise work packet teams with balanced representation Present proposed draft outline for work packet Complete definition of terms Propose and confirm outstanding work packet leaders Face to Face 6 months? Present review of relevant standards and studies???

15 IEEE-SA Project 2020 Subproject Summary M. Kipness, R. Stead, S. Fleck, B. May, P. Denny

16 Agenda Questionnaire Feedback Discussion of Project Proposals Expectations Locations Next Steps Lets make a motion... for the agenda of course.

17 IEEE P2020 AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEM IMAGE QUALITY ROBERT STEAD (CHAIR), DR. SVEN FLECK (VICE CHAIR), BENJAMIN MAY (SECRETARY), PROF. DR. PATRICK DENNY (TREASURER) Q1 SUGGESTED IMAGE QUALITY WORK PACKAGES Q4 WHAT DO YOU EXPECT MOST FROM P2020? Q2 IMAGE QUALITY WORK PACKAGES ADDITIONAL PROPOSALS Q3 LEADING A SUB-GROUP Q5/6 P2020 MEETINGS [EVERY N WEEKS]?1.WEB, 2.FACE TO FACE

18 IEEE P2020 AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEM IMAGE QUALITY ROBERT STEAD (CHAIR), DR. SVEN FLECK (VICE CHAIR), BENJAMIN MAY (SECRETARY), PROF. DR. PATRICK DENNY (TREASURER) Q7 EXPECTATION OF P2020 CONFERENCE Q9 CONTACT INFORMATION Q8 BEST LOCATION FOR THE NEXT FACE-TO-FACE MEETING?

19 Questionaire Feedback Q1-3: Working Groups, Additional Proposals, Leaders of Sub Groups Q4: Expectations Q5&6: Meeting Cadence Q7: Expectation of Meeting Q8: Location for F2F meeting Q9: Contact Information IEEE P2020 AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEM IMAGE QUALITY Q1 SUGGESTED IMAGE QUALITY WORK PACKAGES Q2 IMAGE QUALITY WORK PACKAGES ADDITIONAL PROPOSALS ROBERT STEAD (CHAIR), DR. SVEN FLECK (VICE CHAIR), BENJAMIN MAY (SECRETARY), PROF. DR. PATRICK DENNY (TREASURER) Q4 WHAT DO YOU EXPECT MOST FROM P2020? Q3 LEADING A SUB-GROUP Q5/6 P2020 MEETINGS [EVERY N WEEKS]?1.WEB, 2.FACE TO FACE

20 Topic Summary [proj #1] LED flicker standards [proj #2.X] IQ for viewing [proj #3.X] IQ for computer vision [proj #4] Camera system interface standards [proj #5] IQ safety standards beyond ISO26262 [proj #6] Mapping P2020 standards -> SAE levels [proj #7] Customer perception quality standards [proj #8] Video quality [proj #9] Calibration quality standards [proj #10] IQ requirements/specification standards Initial proposals additional proposals

21 Topic Summary

22 Project Goal - [proj #1] LED flicker standards Harmonization of different settings as this reduces impact on image and machine vision functions such as: vehicle illumination street illumination traffic sign control

23 [proj #2.X] IQ for viewing Two subprojects proposed: [proj #2.1] IQ for viewing - component level KPI standards and test setups [proj #2.2] IQ for viewing - system level KPI standards and test setups

24 [proj #3.X] IQ for computer vision Two subprojects proposed: [proj #3.1] IQ for computer vision - component level KPI standards and test setups [proj #3.2] IQ for computer vision - system level KPI standards and test setups

25 [proj #4] Camera system interface standards especially to measurement systems including: firmware requirements "ONVIF for automotive"

26 [proj #5] IQ safety standards beyond ISO26262 Potential extension of ISO26262 for image quality due to new applications for viewing systems in automotive

27 [proj #6] Mapping P2020 standards -> SAE levels minimum image quality requirements for each SAE level Link to autonomous driving

28 [proj #7] Customer perception quality standards End customer studies and correlation with defined system-level standards (e.g. proj #2.2)

29 [proj #8] Video quality framerate, jitter, lag, etc. motion related issues (artefacts, motion blur, rolling shutter, etc.) video coding standards and tools

30 [proj #9] Calibration quality standards KPI standards for intrinsic + extrinsic calibration component and system calibration plant and online calibration in the field

31 [proj #10] IQ requirements/specification standards standardization of variables, terms and system descriptions

Class KPI-driven development Harmonization of Expectations Convergence of Viewing and Processing

32 Q4: What to Expect? Automotive specific requirements Unified Testing EU H2020 projects Industry Exchange Best In Class KPI-driven development Harmonization of Expectations Convergence of Viewing and Processing Deep learning Terminology harmonization End-to-end automotive system description Automotive lighting standardization (on- & offboard) IQ Standardization Viewing and Perception

33 Q5&6: Meeting Cadence Mean for Webmeeting: Mean for F2F Meeting: Every 7.5 weeks Every 20 weeks

34 Q8: LOCATION Where next?

35 Q8: LOCATION Where next?

36 Next Steps Organization of Sub Group meetings Define Future milestones of Sub Groups Introduction of Sub Group priorities and their respective leaders Beer and Fun

37 Key Contacts P2020 Officers Chair Vice Chair Secretary Treasurer Robert Stead Dr. Sven Fleck Benjamin May Prof. Patrick Denny

C-Roads Platform Terms of Reference

C-Roads Platform Terms of Reference Dissemination level: C-Roads Platform internal Author: AustriaTech Status: Final Index 1 Purpose... 3 2 Governance Structure... 4 3 C-Roads Steering... 6 3.1 Tasks and