Transforming Planning and Scheduling at BP Whiting

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Transforming Planning and Scheduling at BP Whiting"

Lorena Walton
6 years ago
Views:

1 Transforming Planning and Scheduling at BP Whiting How NetPoint is Improving Schedule Quality and Engaging Stakeholders in New Ways Tuesday January 21, 2014 By Kaveh Dabiran, LEED AP 1

Case Study CLIENT BP Whiting Refinery (Whiting, IN) PURPOSE Demonstrate the important role NetPoint and GPM have played in improving the overall Planning & Scheduling function at the BP Whiting

2 Case Study CLIENT BP Whiting Refinery (Whiting, IN) PURPOSE Demonstrate the important role NetPoint and GPM have played in improving the overall Planning & Scheduling function at the BP Whiting Refinery Communicate the way in which these departmental improvements have positively impacted the execution of capital projects at the refinery Abstract The first large scale refining operation began in the mid 1800 s. With the evolving technology in the oil and gas industry over the last 150+ years, there emerged a need to develop and execute more complex projects to ensure these facilities remained competitive. More importantly, the aging infrastructure posed a significant risk to operations. Given these two critical variables, oil refining capital budgets have grown exponentially into the hundreds of millions of dollars per year. With this growth comes greater risk to the stakeholders in these corporations, and a need to address these risks through effective project controls. Unfortunately the project management discipline (scheduling in particular) has not experienced the same growth as the infrastructure they service. This case study will profile the planning/scheduling environment at the BP Whiting Refinery and identify the varying ways NetPoint is being leveraged in the existing P6 centric structure to improve the overall planning effort and stakeholder involvement. 2

CHICAGO Client Facts BP WHITING Built in 1889

1875 mi2) Production: 400K+ barrels/day crude

5M jet) 5th largest refinery in the US 700

3 CHICAGO Client Facts BP WHITING Built in 1889 on 234 acres of land Located in Whiting, IN (pop 5,000) ~20 miles south of downtown Chicago Area: 1400 acres ( mi2) Production: 400K+ barrels/day crude 7.5M gal/day of gasoline (1.5M jet) 5th largest refinery in the US craftsmen onsite daily WRMP Expansion ~$3.8 Billion Average yearly capital spend ~$275M 3 3

4 PMA s Involvement Engaged by BP to provide initial review of WPT Planning/Scheduling practice Involvement at BP Whiting 22 months Staff of 3 full time planning/scheduling consultants (and growing!) 4

5 Organizational Change What prompted BP to do a deep dive into their existing Project Controls practices? Difficulty delivering projects on schedule Missed Annual Spending Targets Difficulty delivering projects under budget THE NEED TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT! 5

Controls Environment Time & Material NTE Contracts +

discussions No Liquidated Damage penalties tied to project

constructor participation) Wrong people in the wrong seats

6 Controls Environment Time & Material NTE Contracts + rolling wave engineering Minimal Change Order entitlement discussions No Liquidated Damage penalties tied to project milestones Baseline schedule meaningless to Contractors (no constructor participation) Wrong people in the wrong seats Contractor s belief the client has the ability to absorb any cost 6

7 Project Services Organization BP Whiting operates under a balanced matrix organization *PMBOK Fourth Edition 7

WPT Planning/Scheduling Breakdown 9 Total Planner/Schedulers, range of ~8 25 projects, ~500 2000 activities, 1 Mo 3 Yrs Operate under a P6 Enterprise Portfolio System (on Citrix Server) Each

8 WPT Planning/Scheduling Breakdown 9 Total Planner/Schedulers, range of ~8 25 projects, ~ activities, 1 Mo 3 Yrs Operate under a P6 Enterprise Portfolio System (on Citrix Server) Each Planner/Scheduler has read/write access (with appropriate database limitations) Project templates that establish a Level 1 WBS, required project/activity codes, and reporting LOE s Contractors NOT allowed in the database, all schedules developed/maintained by WPT Schedulers (JE Schedulers) Importing of Schedules NOT allowed (with exception of NetPoint) Schedules updated every two weeks Resources reconciled every month 8

stages on development) Forecasted annual capital expenditure for the next 5 years

9 The Projects We Service Average ~$275M annual expenditure on WPT capital projects (excluding WRMP) Approximately active projects in the database (at various stages on development) Forecasted annual capital expenditure for the next 5 years of $400M/year Majority of projects are revamp construction on LIVE operating units. 9

project will be developed, tracked, monitored, and delivered on time.

10 Who is our client? Provide the business BP with the assurance that we ve undergone all planning avenues to ensure project will be developed, tracked, monitored, and delivered on time. This includes project performance reporting. Provide the WPT with a sound project schedule to allow team decision makers to proactively adjust the plan to ensure efficient project execution. 10

11 Planning & Scheduling at Whiting Why do we do it? I ve executed projects here longer than you ve been alive. I don t need a schedule A schedule is just a check in the box for project funding I just don t have time to read through all 70 pages of this schedule This isn t my schedule It s the schedulers Produces a complete & well documented plan Proves to the business we re ready to start execution Communication tool for all stakeholders all the way down to the laborer in the field Forces coordination and planning of resources Ensures the team is aligned with the Project Execution Plan Allows for early identification of issues and risks to the project Supports cashflow forecasting 11

12 BP Capital Value Process (CVP) Align with Business Finalize project scope, cost, and schedule Make sure it works Appraise Select Define Execute Operate Compile, Evaluate, and Select an Option Project Funded Build & Commission Detailed Engineering 12

13 Required Schedule Detail Appraise Select Define Execute Appraise L3 L1 L1 L1 Select L3 L1 L1 Define L3 L3 /L2 Execute L3 13

14 The Big Picture Submission of a resource loaded EPC Schedule is required at every stage gate Before entering each stage, scope, schedule, and estimate reviewed Upon approval, this sanctioned schedule becomes the commitment to the business WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT? Key Project Performance Indicators are measured against this baseline Labor resources from sanctioned schedule are used for high level capital program planning as well as monthly cost forecasting Consent Decree projects (EPA) THE SCHEDULE NEEDS TO BE ACCURATE 14

15 The Problem What are the main road blocks to becoming a better department? Culture Negative perception by other functional groups Below average performance & work product Internal Stakeholder involvement in scheduling effort minimal Contractor involvement in scheduling effort minimal Planner/Scheduler involvement in Project minimal Communication & Collaboration 15

16 The Problem (drilled down) Where is the communication gap? Work product = Form of communication Schedules difficult to understand by non schedulers P6 schedules too detailed too many activities P6 layouts all over the place. Work Breakdown Structure inconsistent Field crafts have no interest in a detailed schedule Contractors view scheduling as a desk job administrative function schedules don t apply to them P6 review/markup/update process not collaborative Impacts to project milestones not easily understood by all Schedulers not invited to key project meetings We re not speaking the same language! We re making time commitments without buy in from all stakeholders! 16

17 The New Problem How do we get stakeholders more engaged in the process? OPTION 1 Force P6 Schedules on all key input holders OPTION 2 Present the information in a new way 17

18 "If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail. Abraham Maslow 18

19 The NetPoint era how did it all begin? Wallpaper PERT markup session 19

20 The First NetPoint Schedule 20

21 The Spread of NetPoint Equipment Planning 21

22 The Spread of NetPoint Summary Schedules With project complexity and size increasing, NetPoint schedules were developed and used as a Level 2 Summary Schedules for executive leadership. 22

23 The Spread of NetPoint Engineering Better communication with Engineering (JE Houston) 23

24 The Spread of NetPoint Cashflow Analysis Resource loaded NetPoint schedules were created for programs with yearly cashflow constraints. What if analysis was conducted to organize the work in a fashion that produced the most output. 24

25 The Spread of NetPoint Field Involvement Trades started taking ownership of the schedule Schedules posted in the field 25

26 The Spread of NetPoint Field Involvement 26

27 The Spread of NetPoint Lean Planning Last Planner System production planning system aimed at producing predictable uninterrupted workflow in the field. 27

28 The Spread of NetPoint Lean Planning Pull Planning Meeting 28

29 The Spread of NetPoint Lean Planning Pull Planning Meeting 29

30 The Spread of NetPoint Lean Planning Output 30

31 The Spread of NetPoint Obstacles Additional Work: In some cases, there is a need to develop and track multiple schedules. Focus: The project team may start to focus more on the NetPoint schedule rather than the detailed P6 schedule of record in the database. Blurred lines of responsibility: Non schedulers have shown interest in NetPoint. Some schedulers see this as a threat to their role. 31

Transformation of the Process o o o o o o Increased participation of leadership in schedule development The role of the Planner/Scheduler as a key project member reinstated New input holders

32 Transformation of the Process o o o o o o Increased participation of leadership in schedule development The role of the Planner/Scheduler as a key project member reinstated New input holders inserting themselves into the process (Operations) Field Crafts (Last Planners) pushing for interim planning sessions Contractor commitments agreed to by all on the spot Better functioning teams Better Schedules Improved Communication Improved perception of Planning/Scheduling 32

33 Transformation of the business Cost 2012 monthly cash flow within 5% of projections, better forecasting of annual capital program expenditures Estimating Increased communication within project team produces better information to project estimators Scheduling 17% improvement on Schedule Performance Index (SPI) Project Engineering More Construction input = more confidence in IFC package requests Project Management More confidence in plan allows for better decision making Project Team Culture of collaboration dominant over isolation (working in silos) Executive Leadership Scheduling data presented in more tangible format. More faith in work product. Set the industry benchmark! 33

34 What s Next? Moving the Ship Forward NetRisk By the end of 2014, perform SRA internally on all mid cap projects Lean Planning Utilize NetPoint live in Pull Planning sessions continue to support Lean Training Provide formal training (NPT & GPM) to project teams Reporting Develop customized schedule reports directly from NetPoint 34

35 Questions? PRESENTED BY: Kaveh Dabiran, LEED AP Associate 35

GETTING STARTED WITH LEAN CONSTRUCTION. A guide for project teams

GETTING STARTED WITH LEAN CONSTRUCTION A guide for project teams HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT Outlined in this guide are foundational steps for helping project teams improve the predictability and profitability