Improving Transparency and Predictability of Quarantine and Inspection Services

Transcription

1 Improving Transparency and Predictability of Quarantine and Inspection Services Experience and current status of the Plant Quarantine authorities in Japan Motoi SAKAMURA Kobe Plant Protection Station Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) JAPAN Expert Group Meeting on Modernizing the GASI of Mongolia towards an Efficient Trading Environment in North-East Asia 4-5 JULY 2012, Ulaan Baatar, Mongolia 1

2 1. International rules to be considered when applying plant quarantine measures The WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement) -Basic provisions to be followed for application of SPS measures - Basic rights/obligations (Article 2), Harmonization (Art.3), Risk based measures (Art. 5), Transparency(Art.7, SPS notification system based on the annex B) The International Plant Protection Convention (FAO) - Developing the International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPMs) Technical or procedural guidance for establishing or applying PQ measures 2

3 2. Transparency of PQ regulation and measures Means to communicate with business entity and the general public (experiences of NPPO of Japan) Plant quarantine measures, in its nature, conflicts in the views between: - interception of pest incursion in order to protect crops and nature from damages by pests and - facilitation of distribution and traffics The SPS agreement/the IPPC deal with this contradictory point in well-balanced manner for: - ensuring member countries to take plant quarantine measures, as their sovereign right, while - requesting measures that should be scientifically sound and the least restrictive to trade 3

4 2-2. Transparency of PQ regulation and measures Accountability of the NPPOs NPPOsshould keep good communication with the industry and the general publics on: - the duties/responsibilities of the NPPO and role of stakeholders in PQ regulation - plant quarantine policy - rational of regulatory measures being taken - choices the way to go forward 4

5 3. Domestic Schemes to perform transparency and predictability Public hearing meeting Legally required procedure when introducing or revising legislation Public comment through a website For collection of comments through documentary procedures Risk communication meeting - to share views on general policy and specific measures to be introduced or revised, with stakeholders (grower, trader, broker, transporter, consumer, academic people etc.) - Discussion among stakeholders is effective to share functions, responsibilities of NPPOs and stakeholders - Result of the discussion should be open to access to the publics through gazette or website. Public relations - to obtain better understanding, cooperation and public awareness to PQ activities - to promote good practices of trading/agriculture What should or should not do to protect agricultural and forest production from pest invasion with minimizing trade restriction. 5

6 4. Information sharing with stakeholders and the general publics Information should be provided that have stakeholders and the general publics known how they will be affected by introduction of the measures. Information or actions to be provided includes: - PQ legislative/administrative/operational systems - procedures,criteria and standards of inspection, result of pest identification detected - PQ requirements of importing country when export - procurement of qualified staff, facilities, equipment and another resource and infrastructure necessary to perform PQ activities And preferably: - Pest status in the world, risk of those invasion and damages - PQ measures to interrupt or ease those hazard with scientific rational - etc. 6

7 (Appendix1) International information sharing SPS Notification system Based on WTO/SPS Agreement Notification to member countries of SPS measures which are intended to be introduced or revised and might affect trade. Except in urgent circumstances, Members shall provide interested members a reasonable period of time to submit comment, that is, a 60-day comment and to allow a reasonable interval of 6 months between the publication of these regulations and its entry into force. Members discuss the comments upon request, and take the comments and the result of the discussion into account. Japan SPS Notification WTO Secretariat WTO members (155Countries) Inquiries,Comments 7

8 (Appendix2) Domestic information sharing Stakeholders involvement and participation in developing phytosanitary measures Circulation of draft measures for comment Meeting to review and exchange views with other related authorities, stakeholders and academic peoples opportunity for comment to the daft for better understanding and public awareness on the draft 8

9 (Appendix3) Domestic information sharing Stakeholders involvement and participation in reviewing phytosanitary regulations Draft proposal New Approach Legally required by the Plant Protection Law Proposal The relevant regulations are amended 9