Table of Contents. Sustainability Management Plan

Transcription

1

2 Table of Contents Compliance Matrix... 4 Glossary Introduction Purpose Scope Background Policy, Objectives and Targets....5 Plan structure Interactions with other management plans Legal and other requirements Legislation Project compliance requirements Guidelines Leadership and collaboration Our team Sustainability Advisor Collaboration with TfNSW Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia Independent Sustainability Professional Sustainability management system Governance Training, awareness and knowledge sharing Sustainability Data Capture and Reporting Review, auditing and continual improvement IS rating for Design and As-Built Key sustainability aspects Climate change resilience Water efficiency Waste and materials reduction Community benefit Pollution control Sustainable procurement and supply chain Temporary site facilities Workforce development and industry participation... 5 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page of 4

3 5.9 Green travel plan Carbon and Energy Management Plan Overview and objectives Greenhouse gas reporting standards Scope of modelling and monitoring program Carbon and energy targets Carbon and energy management strategies and initiatives Monitoring and reporting Materials Management Plan Overview and Objectives Materials footprint Mitigation of impacts associated with materials use Waste minimisation and reuse... 6 Part B Systems and tools Appendix A Environment and Sustainability Policy Statement... Appendix B Excerpt from TSE Combined Audit Schedule... Appendix C TSE ISCA Weightings Assessment (planning phase)... 3 Appendix D EOI questionnaires... 4 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 3 of 4

4 Compliance Matrix Clause Detail Document Reference Scope of Work and Technical Criteria Appendix E.6 6(d) The Sustainability Plan must, as a minimum, address and detail: (i) the sustainability management team structure, including key personnel, authority and roles of key personnel, lines of responsibility and communication, resourcing for each role in terms of full-time equivalents, minimum skill levels of each role and interfaces with the overall project organisation structure; Section 3.0 (ii) a sustainability policy statement Section.4 and Appendix A (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) strategies for mitigation of risks associated with climate change and extreme weather events; strategies for resource management and selection of materials to minimise environmental impacts; sustainability initiatives to be implemented during the performance of the TSE Contractor s Activities and milestones for key sustainability initiatives; processes and methodologies for tracking the identification and implementation of sustainability initiatives; processes and methodologies for embedding sustainability initiatives into design, procurement and processes; processes and methodologies for assurance, monitoring auditing, corrective action, continuous improvement and reporting on sustainability performance; processes and methodologies for verifying and assuring the accuracy of sustainability performance data; a description of the overall approach to the identification of opportunities to reduce carbon emissions, energy use and embodied lifecycle impacts of the TSE Contractor s Activities; Section 5. Section 5.3 Section 4.0 and Element Sustainability targets Part B Systems and tools Section 4.. and 5.6 Section 4.4 and Element 4 Auditing, review and improvement Section and Element 3 Monitoring, modelling and reporting Section 6.0 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 4 of 4

5 Clause Detail Document Reference (xi) (xii) (xiii) (xiv) processes and methodologies for ensuring that Design and As Built rating score of least 65 under the Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia Infrastructure Sustainability Rating Tool version. for the design and of the Project Works and Temporary Works will be achieved; an Infrastructure Sustainability Rating Tool Scorecard which indicates the credits and levels which will be targeted for achievement for the Design and As Built IS Rating; processes and procedures for undertaking climate change risk assessments; processes and procedures for the identification and implementation of climate change adaption measures; Section 4.0 Section 4.5 and Appendix C Section 5. Section 5. (xv) the approach to sustainable procurement including: Section 5.6 A. the processes and environmental and social criteria that will be used for the selection of Subcontractors; B. how the TSE Contractor will ensure that Subcontractors and suppliers comply with sustainability requirements; C. how the TSE Contractor will ensure that any materials and equipment procured from a developing county have been sourced from suppliers which comply with local regulations and do not contravene internally accepted human rights standards. (xvi) an outline of the systems that will be used to support sustainability management; and Section 4.5. (xvii) interfaces with other Project Plans Section.6 (e) (f) The Sustainability Plan must for each of the sustainability targets identified in Appendix A.7 of the SWTC identify how each of the sustainability targets will be met. The Sustainability Plan must also include, as sub-plans, a separate Carbon and Energy Management Plan, Waste Management and Recycling Plan, and Materials Management Plan. Element Sustainability targets Carbon and Energy Management Plan (Section 6.0) Materials Management Plan (Section 7.0) Construction Waste and Recycling Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 5 of 4

6 Clause Detail Document Reference TPW-EM-PLN- 000) (g) The Carbon and Energy Management Plan must address the requirements of the CEMF, and detail: Section 6.0 (i) (ii) (iii) strategies and initiatives that will be implemented to minimise the carbon emissions associated with the of the Project Works and Temporary Works; energy efficiency strategies and initiatives that will be implemented to minimise energy use associated with the of the Project Works and Temporary Works estimated carbon emissions, incorporating direct and indirect emissions associated with electricity and fuel consumption, on-site process emissions and embodied emissions for all concrete and steel used in the of the Project Works and Temporary Works. Estimated emissions must include separate subtotals for Scope emissions, Scope emissions and Scope 3 emissions. The TfNSW Carbon Estimation and Reporting Tool (CERT) may be used to develop the estimate; Section 6.5 Section 6.5 Section 6.3 (iv) the carbon emission reduction targets Section 6.4 (v) estimates of the quantities of electricity and fuel which will be used in the of the Project Works and Temporary Works, determined using energy modelling, including electrical energy consumption, fuel consumption, on-site renewable energy generation; and renewable energy sourced from the main electricity grid; Section 6.3 (vi) the electricity and fuel consumption reduction targets; and Section 6.4 (vii) processes and methodologies for monitoring, auditing and the taking of corrective action. Section 4.4 and Element 4 Auditing, review and improvement (h) The Waste Management and Recycling Plan must address the requirements of the CEMF and: (i) identify quantities of waste that will be recycled, beneficially re-used or disposed of; (ii) demonstrate how the quantities identified for recycling or beneficial reuse have been maximised; and (iii) describe how the waste recycling targets identified in the will be met. Refer to the Construction Waste and Recycling Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN- 000) SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 6 of 4

7 Clause Detail Document Reference (i) The Materials Management Plan must address the requirements of the Transport for NSW Sydney Metro Construction Environmental Management Framework, and detail: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) the sustainable procurement policy which will be implemented for the TSE Contractor s Activities; the relevant requirements of the City & Southwest Environment and Sustainability Policy and the City & Southwest Sustainability Strategy the materials mitigation measures as detailed in any project Planning Approvals; the responsibilities of key project personnel with respect to the implementation of the Materials Management Plan; measures which will be implemented for the TSE Contractor s Activities to: A. minimise the quantities of materials which will be required; B. minimise the environmental impact of the materials which will be used; C. maximise the use of recycled materials; the estimated materials footprint for the of the Project Works and Temporary Works, calculated using the Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia Materials Calculator Section 7.0 Part B Systems and tools Part B Systems and tools Section 3.0 Section 7.0 Section 7.0 Note: Relevant Planning Approval Conditions, Revised Environmental Mitigation Measures (REMMs), elements of TfNSW s Construction Environmental Management Framework, and other requirements from the Scope of Works and Technical Criteria (SWTC) are addressed in Part B of this Plan. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 7 of 4

8 Glossary Term/ acronym CEMF CEMP CERT DP&E EIS EMS GHG GREP ISCA JHCPBG NGERS POEO Act Project Project Planning Approval REMM Spoil SWTC TBM TfNSW TSE Works Definition Construction Environmental Management Framework (Appendix B of the Submissions and Preferred Infrastructure Report) Construction Environmental Management Plan TfNSW Carbon Estimate and Reporting Tool NSW Department of Planning and Environment Sydney Metro City & Southwest, Chatswood to Sydenham Environmental Impact Statement, May 06 Environmental Management System Greenhouse gas Government Resource Efficiency Policy Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia John Holland CPB Ghella National Greenhouse Emissions Rating Scheme Protection of the Environment Operations Act 997 (NSW) Sydney Metro City & Southwest Critical State Significant Infrastructure Sydney Metro & Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham Infrastructure Approval dated 9 January 07 (Application no. SSI 5_7400) Revised Environmental Mitigation Measures (Chapter of the Submissions and Preferred Infrastructure Report). All material generated by excavation into the ground including the excavation of station boxes and tunnels Scope of Work and Technical Criteria Tunnel Boring Machine Transport for New South Wales Tunnels and Station Civil Works for the Sydney Metro City & Southwest Project SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 8 of 4

9 PART A - OVERVIEW.0 Introduction. Purpose The purpose of this (this Plan) is to describe how John Holland CPB Ghella (JHCPBG) will consider and apply the principles of ecologically sustainable development during delivery of the Tunnel and Station Excavation Works (TSE Works) package of the Sydney Metro City & Southwest Project (the Project). In doing so, this Plan addresses the relevant requirements of TfNSW's Construction Environmental Management Framework (CEMF), the Revised Environmental Mitigation Measures (REMMs), the Project Planning Approval, applicable legislation, and contractual requirements, including the TSE Project Deed and Scope of Work and Technical Criteria (SWTC). JHCPBG is designing and constructing the TSE Works package of the Project for Transport for NSW (TfNSW), who is delivering the Project on behalf of the NSW Government. This Plan sets out the structure and function of TSE Works sustainability management system and details how JHCPBG will work collaboratively with TfNSW to enhance sustainability outcomes during delivery of the TSE Works package. Through cross-functional commitment and collaboration, and a focus on innovative thinking, JHCPBG strives to achieve tangible sustainability outcomes during delivery of the TSE Works that will leave a positive legacy. As permitted under SWTC Appendix E.6 Clause (b), this Plan includes the Carbon and Energy Management Plan, the Materials Management Plan, and the Green Travel Plan. The Construction Waste and Recycling Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN- 000) is a separate aspect specific sub-plan to the Construction Environmental Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0000). The Workforce Development and Industry Participation Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-HR-PLN-0044) is a separate plan prepared and managed by JHCPBG s People and Culture Team.. Scope As set out in the Construction Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-CN-PLN-00035), the TSE Works scope is limited to site establishment, and excavation of station boxes and tunnels between Chatswood and Marrickville. In addition to the TSE Works, TfNSW has divided the Project into numerous additional contract packages. Completed sections of the TSE Works, including established worksites, will be progressively handed over to TfNSW to enable commencement of rail systems fit-out works. JHCPBG was awarded the TSE Works contract on June 07. The TSE Works design schedule shows design continuing until early 09, with design packages being progressively finalised. Site establishment works commenced in October 07 following issue of the TSE Works Environment Protection Licence (EPL) on 8 September 07. Construction (as defined in the Project Planning Approval) commenced in January 08 following Construction Approval being granted by the Department of Planning and Environment on December 08. Construction is scheduled to continue until mid-0, when the final portion of the TSE Works is scheduled to be handed over to TfNSW. This timeline is illustrated in Figure. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 9 of 4

10 PART A - OVERVIEW Figure : TSE Works indicative project timeline With regards to demolition works, this Plan only applies to those demolition works carried out by JHCPBG, and not the works completed under the two Demolition Contracts that novated to JHCPBG following award of the TSE Project Deed. As per Schedule E3 of Schedule A6 of the Project Deed, TfNSW retained responsibility for the sustainability requirements in the Project Planning Approval under these two Novated Demolition Contracts. While this Plan has been developed to consider a wide range of risks and opportunities presented by the Project as a whole, it must be recognised that value for money and compliance with the technical requirements of the SWTC remain core objectives for TfNSW, the Project, and TSE Works. JHCPBG is therefore not able to influence sustainability outcomes that conflict with other technical requirements such as durability and those outside the scope of the TSE Works. To this end, the JHCPBG Approvals, Environment and Sustainability, and Design and Construction teams have worked collaboratively with TfNSW in formulating the TSE Works to comprehensively address the specified sustainability initiatives..3 Background Sustainability is an emerging, fluid and dynamic concept, which is of increasing importance to efficient, effective, and responsible businesses. One of the earliest definitions of sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs (Our Common Future, United Nations WCED, 987). The sustainability model is holistic and cannot be approached as an add-on initiative, requiring an integrated approach that needs to be part of the whole-of-project lifecycle. As such, this Plan will apply to design, initial planning and procurement, throughout, and through to handover of the TSE Works to TfNSW. The EIS highlighted that, for the Sydney Metro City & Southwest Project, sustainability means building public transport for current and future generations that optimises environmental, social and sustainability outcomes, transit service quality and cost effectiveness. The EIS included a sustainability policy and an initial Sydney Metro City & Southwest sustainability strategy, providing a response to relevant government regulations and policies, and setting out specific objectives and initiatives to be integrated into the project planning and design, procurement, and operational stages of the project. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 0 of 4

11 PART A - OVERVIEW These initiatives and targets have been further refined by TfNSW and are documented in the Sydney Metro City & Southwest Sustainability Strategy (07-04) (SMCSW Sustainability Strategy). This strategy has been prepared by TfNSW in line with Condition E7 of the Project Planning Approval. JHCPBG is required under the Project Deed to comply with this strategy and provide information to TfNSW regarding the implementation of this strategy during the TSE Works. This strategy establishes a clear and ground-breaking sustainability vision, building on and reinforcing the industry benchmarks for other projects that TfNSW established in successfully delivering the Sydney Metro Northwest Project. Figure illustrates the framework of the SMCSW Sustainability Strategy. This Plan has been developed to align with the objectives of the SMCSW Sustainability Strategy, with Section 4.0 describing how JHCPBG will address those objectives that are relevant to the TSE Works. Figure : TfNSW s sustainability framework, as per Figure 4 of the Sydney Metro City & Southwest Strategy (07-04) SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page of 4

12 PART A - OVERVIEW.4 Policy, Objectives and Targets JHCPBG's Environment and Sustainability Policy Statement sets out the principles for delivering the TSE Works to maximise environmental, social, and economic benefits, while minimising impacts (see Appendix A). This policy It has a strong focus on continual improvement, industry uplift, and leaving a lasting positive legacy. JHCPBG s Environment and Sustainability Policy was established at tender and has been endorsed by the TSE Project Director. It will remain applicable throughout the lifecycle of the TSE Works. The policy was updated in October 08 to make minor edits and to replace reference to the British Standard for Sustainable Procurement, BS: 8903: Principles and Framework for Procuring Sustainably, with the ISO 0400:07 Sustainable Procurement Guide. To ensure successful implementation of the TSE Environment and Sustainability Policy, JHCPBG has established sustainability objectives and targets that embed our Policy commitments. These objectives and targets have been set in line with the requirements and targets of SWTC Appendix A.7, the SMCSW Sustainability Strategy, and the ISCA IS Rating Tool Version.. The key sustainability objectives for the TSE Works are: Maximise efficiencies to reduce our footprint, in relation to energy, water, materials, and waste Mitigate pollution and avoid environmental harm in accordance with TSE Works environmental requirements Protect, promote and enhance heritage values through appropriate design, planning, and management controls Achieve net positive benefits for the environment and community and leave a positive legacy Contribute to industry uplift by building an engaged, diverse, and highly skilled workforce Drive sustainable procurement processes and influence subcontractors and suppliers to adopt sustainable practices and initiatives Demonstrate industry leading sustainability performance in line with the TSE Works vision of Staying Ahead of the Game, by driving innovation, encouraging critical thinking and building on a culture of continual improvement The sustainability targets adopted for the TSE Works are embedded in section of SWTC Appendix A.7. These sustainability targets are listed in Part B Element of this Plan, which also includes detail on how JHCPBG aims to address and deliver on these targets. Our focus has been on setting achievable objectives and targets to not only minimise the negative impact of the TSE Works, but achieve net positive benefits and ensure continual improvement. These objectives and targets will efforts of the JHCPBG team in delivering the TSE Works and ensure the Project has a lasting positive legacy for individuals, the industry and communities. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page of 4

13 PART A - OVERVIEW.5 Plan structure This Plan is structured as follows: PART A OVERVIEW Section.0: An introduction to the Plan, the TSE Works, objectives and targets, and interrelationships to other plans and management documents Section.0: Legal and other requirements Section 3.0: Leadership and collaboration, outlining roles and responsibilities for sustainability management Section 4.0: Details of the TSE Works sustainability management system Section 5.0: Key sustainability aspects and associated management strategies for the TSE Works Section 6.0: TSE Works Carbon and Energy Management Plan Section 7.0: TSE Works Materials Management Plan PART B IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Element Sustainability targets Element Training Element 3 Monitoring, modelling and reporting Element 4 Auditing, review and improvement Element 5 Project specific requirements.6 Interactions with other management plans APPENDICES Appendix A Environment and Sustainability Policy Statement Appendix C Excerpt from TSE Combined Audit Schedule Appendix C TSE ISCA Weightings Assessment Appendix D EOI questionnaires This Plan is part of a suite of management plans and sub-plans that form a detailed, cohesive and consistent framework for managing all aspects of the TSE Works. It has the following interrelationships with other management plans and documents: The Construction Environmental Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN- 0000) sets out governance, monitoring, reporting, auditing and corrective action processes applicable to sustainability The Design Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-DN-PLN-00030) sets out the design management process including detailing the value engineering process which will be utilised to ensure that all requirements including sustainability requirements are embedded in the design SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 3 of 4

14 PART A - OVERVIEW Risk Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-GN-PLN-0000) sets out the risk management approach and procedures to be applied to the TSE delivery. The Quality Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-QA-PLN-00005) outlines reporting and auditing requirements for the TSE Works. The Community Communications Strategy (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-SH-PLN-00040) sets out the framework for community and stakeholder liaison and engagement for the TSE Works. The Procurement Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PR-PLN-0065) details how JHCPBG will manage procurement and tender processes during the TSE Works. Management of waste will be in accordance with the Construction Waste Management and Recycling Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-000), and the Spoil Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0009) sets out the spoil management and reuse strategy to be adopted for the TSE Works The Construction Soil, Water and Groundwater Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-0004) details strategies to be applied to minimise water usage, manage soil and contamination, surface water and groundwater and maximise water reuse during the TSE Works. Flood modelling has been undertaken to develop the design of the temporary and permanent works and documented in the Stormwater and Flooding Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-DN-PLN-0003) Construction Heritage Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0005) details management strategies to minimise impacts on Aboriginal and historic heritage items and archaeology Construction Flora and Fauna Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN- 0006) details management strategies to minimise impacts on flora and fauna Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN- 000) details assessment protocols and management strategies for minimising noise and vibration including ground borne vibration Construction Air Quality Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0008) details management strategies to minimise dust and emissions from plant and equipment during Visual Amenity Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0000) describes how JHCPBG will minimise and manage impacts on visual amenity and applies Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design principles Security and Crime Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-GN-PLN-0008) which sets out security and crime management measures to be implemented across the TSE Worksites TfNSW will develop an Implementation Plan outlining the program and methodology for utilising the ISCA IS Rating Tool across the Project. Upon its release, JHCPBG will review this Plan to ensure consistency with the Project-wide ISCA Implementation Plan. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 4 of 4

15 PART A - OVERVIEW.0 Legal and other requirements. Legislation The key legislation relevant to sustainability management includes: Protection of the Environment Administration Act 99 (PEA Act) Protection of the Environment Operations Act 997 (POEO Act) National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (NGER) Act 007 (Cth) Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 999 (Cth) The requirements of the PEA Act are discussed below. Refer to the Construction Environmental Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0000) for further details of the relevant legislation. The principles of Ecologically Sustainable Development are outlined in the Protection of the Environment Administration Act 99 (PEA Act). Ecologically sustainable development (ESD) is development that improves the total quality of life, both now and in the future, in a way that maintains the ecological processes on which life depends. The principles of ESD have been an integral consideration throughout the development of the Project. The PEA Act recognises that ESD requires the effective integration of economic, social and environmental considerations in decision-making processes. There are four main principles supporting the achievement of ESD: Precautionary principle The precautionary principle deals with certainty in decisionmaking. It provides that where there is a threat of serious or irreversible environmental damage, the absence of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason to postpone measures to prevent environmental degradation. The EIS as a whole identified no threat of serious or irreversible environmental damage Inter-and intra-generational equity Inter-generational equity is the concept of fairness between people of different generations. In this context, it refers to the need to minimise the passing on of economic, social and environmental costs to future generations. Intragenerational equity is the concept of fairness between people of the same generation. It is also called social equity and refers to the need for fairness in the distribution of economic, social and environmental costs and benefits. Once it begins operating, the Project will deliver inter-and intra-generational equity by: - Enhancing access and cohesion between north and south eastern Sydney - Enhancing social equity by improving access for the disabled, elderly, and for parents with young children - Providing a positive public transport legacy for future generations. Conservation of biological diversity and ecological integrity - The twin principles of biodiversity conservation and ecological integrity have been a consideration during the course of the design and planning process with a view to identifying, avoiding, minimising and mitigating impacts during. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 5 of 4

16 PART A - OVERVIEW Improved valuation and pricing of environmental resources - The principle of internalising environmental costs into decision making requires consideration of all environmental resources which may be affected by a project, including air, water, land and living things. Placing a reliable monetary value on the residual, environmental and social effects of the project presents a number of challenges. Nonetheless, a range of environmental impacts and associated costs have been considered in the economic appraisal included in the EIS including air pollution, greenhouse gases, noise pollution and water pollution.. Project compliance requirements Compliance requirements relating to the content of this are summarised in the Compliance Matrix at the beginning of this Plan. Additional sustainability compliance requirements from the Scope of Works and Technical Criteria (SWTC), Project Planning Approval, and Revised Environmental Management Measures (REMMs), are addressed in Part B of this Plan..3 Guidelines Table outlines guidelines and standards relating to the management of sustainability, to be considered as part of the TSE Works. Table : Sustainability guidelines and standards Document Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (ISCA) Infrastructure Sustainability Technical Manual Version., May 06 ISCA IS Materials Calculator Guideline Version., June 07 Carbon Estimate and Reporting Tool Manual Version, November 07 National Greenhouse Accounts Factors, July 08 Relevance to the TSE Works The application of the ISCA IS Technical Manual Version. is to align Projects and associated contract packages with best practice performance in relation to sustainability for infrastructure projects. The IS Materials Calculator evaluates environmental impacts in relation to use of materials on infrastructure projects and assets and is used to address the requirements of the TSE Works Materials Management Plan (Section 7.0) and ISCA credit Mat-. Application of the IS Materials Calculator to the TSE Works will be undertaken in accordance with this guideline. Use of the TfNSW Carbon Estimate and Reporting Tool (CERT) for data capture and reporting is required by a number of requirements in the TSE Works SWTC. All TSE Works requirements that necessitate the use of CERT will be addressed in accordance with these guidelines. The National Greenhouse Accounts Factors document sets out greenhouse gas emissions factors for use in calculating emissions. The emissions factors have been estimated by the Department of the Environment and Energy using the Australian Greenhouse Emissions Information System (AGEIS). SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 6 of 4

17 PART A - OVERVIEW 3.0 Leadership and collaboration 3. Our team The integrated nature of sustainability management means sustainability performance must be a shared responsibility across the TSE Works project team. An overview of the roles and responsibilities of key JHCPBG personnel with respect to sustainability management on the TSE Works is provided in Table. It is noted that the, under the leadership of the Approvals, Environment and Sustainability, and with expert advice from the Sustainability Advisor, will perform the role of Sustainability as set out in Schedule A8 of the Project Deed. Table : Role and responsibility of key JHCPBG personnel with respect to sustainability management on the TSE Works Position Responsibility Project Director Managing delivery of the TSE Works including overseeing implementation of sustainability initiatives Act as Contractor s Representative Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Oversee development and implementation of all sustainability initiatives for the TSE Works Development and implementation of the Sustainability Management Plan Be engaged full-time during the delivery of the TSE Works Sustainability Advisor Assist in the development and implementation of the Be engaged to contribute a minimum average of one () day per week to the TSE Works Sustainability Graduate/ Coordinator Assist in the implementation of the Sustainability Management Plan Be engaged full-time during the delivery of the TSE Works Commercial Ensure relevant sustainability requirements are considered in procuring materials and services Design Team Ensure relevant sustainability requirements are addressed in design development Workforce Development and Industry Participation Develop and implement strategies to achieve the TSE Works workforce targets Senior Stakeholder and Community Relations Construction Director, Construction s and delegates Communicate sustainability initiatives to the surrounding community Manage the delivery of the process in relation to sustainability across all worksites, in conjunction with the Project Sustainability SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 7 of 4

18 PART A - OVERVIEW Position Project Environment Environment coordinators Project s Project Engineers Responsibility Provide data to the for sustainability reporting Ensure relevant sustainability requirements are reflected in subcontracts Participate in the review of sustainability performance and other relevant sustainability meetings and programs Assurance Oversee development and implementation of project risk and opportunity management system, including capture of sustainability risks and opportunities Ensure relevant sustainability requirements are addressed in project quality processes The detailed roles, responsibilities and authorities of JHCBPG's Approvals, Environment and Sustainability team, including specialist consultants, are provided in the Construction Environmental Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0000). 3. Sustainability Advisor The will be supported and mentored by a Sustainability Advisor. The TSE Sustainability Advisor role is being performed by Fin Robertson, Director of Sustainable Asset Strategies. Fin will provide sustainability strategy advice throughout the delivery of the TSE Works and assist with the collection, interpretation and submission of data required to achieve ISCA IS ratings. With over 8 years experience in the sustainability field, covering an extensive portfolio of transport infrastructure projects, Fin specialises in developing strategies to deliver sustainable outcomes. Fin is focused on providing practical project solutions through the knowledgeable management of project deliverables. 3.3 Collaboration with TfNSW JHCPBG will work collaboratively with TfNSW to achieve best-for-project outcomes that benefit the broader community. We understand that for positive outcomes to be achieved with a lasting legacy, it is imperative that a strong working relationship is maintained throughout the TSE Works. JHCPBG also knows that early collaboration with follow-on Contractors is imperative to ensure the overall success of the Project. TfNSW will establish and lead a quarterly contractor sustainability forum to facilitate knowledge sharing and collaboration between sustainability leads across the various packages of the Sydney Metro program. 3.4 Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia JHCPBG has registered the TSE Works with the Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia (ISCA) and is applying the ISCA IS Rating Tool version. to the TSE Works in collaboration with TfNSW and ISCA, to achieve the ratings specified in the Project Deed and SWTC Appendix A.7 (Section 4.). The TSE Works has been assigned an ISCA Case to provide guidance and assistance to JHCPBG during preparation of the project IS Rating. JHCPBG will hold regular progress meetings with the TSE Works ISCA Case and TfNSW to discuss rating development. Further detail about the TSE Works ISCA Rating process is provided in Section 4.5. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 8 of 4

19 PART A - OVERVIEW 3.5 Independent Sustainability Professional An independent Sustainability Professional (ISP) has been assigned to the TSE Works in line with ISCA credit Man-3. The ISP reviews, audits, and reports on TSE sustainability performance. Their role is to suggest areas for improvement to the to ensure continual improvement and to meet the requirements stated in ISCA s IS Tool Man-4 credit. The ISP role for the TSE Works is being fulfilled by Simon Hooper, Sustainability & Environment Tasmania in John Holland s VIC/SA/TAS & NZ region. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 9 of 4

20 PART A - OVERVIEW 4.0 Sustainability management system 4. Governance 4.. Making best practice standard practice Sustainability considers social, economic, and environmental performance over short, medium, and long-term timeframes. The earlier in the feasibility appraisal, design development, and environmental assessment process that sustainability principles are considered, the greater the opportunity to achieve a more sustainable long-term solution, at a lower total cost. Sustainability principles have been assessed and considered by TfNSW as part of the EIS, SPIR, and during development of the TSE Works SWTC requirements. The TSE Works sustainability policy, objectives, and targets are set out in Section.4. JHCPBG has developed its management systems to ensure focus is maintained on sustainability principles throughout the TSE Works lifecycle, but especially during planning and design phases. JHCPBG acknowledges that there are many ways that sustainability can be applied to projects. A clear, flexible and adaptable high-level process to guide the incorporation of sustainability is required for the TSE Works. Figure 3 outlines how sustainability principles and requirements will be integrated throughout the lifecycle of the TSE Works. Planning Define Sustainability for thetse Works Identify targets and management framework Develop Design Hold Value Engineering Workshops for the TSE Works Reconcile competing or conflicting targets and project requirments Document selected intiatives in relevant design lots Construction Ensure sustainabiility initiatives and reporting are incorporated into relevant sub-contracts Integrate sustainability awareness and intitiatives into inductions Ensure sustainability metrics and monitoring systems are integrated into the TSE systems Continual Review Assess performance against targets Implement knowledge sharing acticvities based on key finding Figure 3: Integration of sustainability principles throughout the lifecycle of the TSE Works 4.. Embedding sustainability into the design development process Design typically contributes about 5% of overall delivery costs but determines around 80% of the actual outcomes. This indicates that the ability to influence the constructed outcome is heavily weighted towards the design phase. The TSE Sustainability Team will work closely SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 0 of 4

21 PART A - OVERVIEW with the Design Team to ensure that sustainability requirements and initiatives are embedded and implemented in design development. The Approvals, Environment and Sustainability and will meet regularly with the Design Team and relevant design leads to discuss and document initiatives implemented in design that have sustainability implications and benefits. These will be recorded in the TSE Works Value Engineering and Sustainability Opportunity Register (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-REG-06067). This register is further discussed in Section 4..3 of this Plan. In addition, all design reports will include detail on environment and sustainability considerations and compliance. The TSE Works design will be developed in three phases to allow adequate opportunity to both optimise the design effort through collaboration and coordination, and to optimise design quality and integrity through review: Developed Concept Design (DCD) Substantial Detailed Design (SDD) Final Design (FD) Assured for Construction (AFC) This is described in the TSE Design Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-DN-PLN ) Sustainability risk and opportunity management Sustainability risks and opportunities associated with the delivery of the TSE Works project are captured in the Project Wide Risk Register (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PM-REG-0600)). This is in line with JHCPBG s risk management system, documented in the TSE Risk Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PM-PLN-0000). Further, sustainability opportunities identified during the design process are documented in the Value Engineering and Sustainability Opportunity Register (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM- REG-06067). This register is used to document and assess sustainability initiatives identified in design, in relation to environmental, social, and economic risks and opportunities. Capture of data in this register will be a collaborative process, involving input from representatives across relevant functional areas. Relevant sustainability risks and opportunities identified through this process will be carried into the Project Wide Risk Register (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PM-REG-0600). JHCPBG has also established a process for capturing sustainability initiatives and opportunities identified during the phase of the TSE Works, through completion of the Sustainability Initiatives Reporting Form (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-FRM-00480). Site teams and functional areas are encouraged to complete this form monthly to report on any initiatives they ve considered or implemented that have sustainability benefits. The form can be completed collaboratively or by individuals. Initiatives reported through this process are captured by the Sustainability Team on Oris-SharePoint in the Sustainability Initiatives and Opportunities Register. Relevant opportunities will be carried into the Project Wide Risk Register (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PM-REG-0600). SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page of 4

22 PART A - OVERVIEW 4. Training, awareness and knowledge sharing JHCPBG recognises the importance of training, education, and knowledge sharing to achieving sustainable outcomes on projects and across the broader industry. As sustainable is still considered an emerging, fluid and dynamic concept, it s important for projects and organisations to continually share learnings, successes, and ideas so the that opportunities for sustainable outcomes can continue to be considered and achieved. The below provides an overview of JHCPBG s approach to sustainability training, awareness raising, and knowledge sharing. 4.. Education and training JHCPBG provides training and education on sustainability management aspects of the TSE Works through the following: TSE Project Induction the project induction includes a sustainability component to ensure all personnel inducted onto the project have an understanding of sustainability and its requirements. This will also assist in ensuring a one-team approach across functional areas towards a high standard of sustainability performance. This component of the induction will be delivered by the or appropriate delegated personnel. TSE Game Plan training All JHCPBG staff members engaged on the TSE Works will be required to attend Game Plan training in addition to attending Project Induction. This training equips new staff members with a base level of information on how the TSE Works will be delivered, with functional leads providing an overview of key risks, compliance requirements and expectations as detailed in their respective Management Plans. The Game Plan training includes a specific module on sustainability management for TSE. Sustainability toolbox talks and workshops toolbox talks targeted around relevant sustainability initiatives and ideas generation will be rolled out across the TSE worksites to communicate key messages, reinforce requirements, and seek feedback. ISCA Infrastructure Sustainability Accredited Professional Training (ISAP) Relevant TSE Works project staff will be encouraged to complete ISCA s ISAP training, particularly personnel within the Environment and Sustainability Team, and other relevant functional areas. 4.. Reward and recognition There are a number of opportunities for TSE works staff and workforce to be recognised for their achievements on the project, including in relation to sustainability performance and initiatives. These include: The Staying Ahead of the Game Awards the Awards will be made to recognise individuals and the teams whose work puts into action the JHCPBG s vision and values. The awards will be set up to celebrate outstanding leadership, commitment and work ethic which all contribute to the successful delivery of the TSE Works. All staff, workforce and subcontractor personnel can nominate individuals or teams that they feel are worthy of recognition across the whole team. The project newsletter (Tunnel Times) and internal television program (Tunnel Vision) publicises the winners and the nominees. There are two awards presented each month: SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page of 4

23 PART A - OVERVIEW - Project Directors Award (Staff); and - Jim Adams Award (Workforce). On the Spot Awards program Monthly awards given to project staff to provide real time recognition of behaviours and achievements that promote the Project s Vision and Values. Awards are handed out by the project Senior Leadership Team Knowledge sharing JHCPBG is committed to enhancing sustainability culture and raising awareness about sustainability principles and initiatives throughout the TSE Works and beyond. As such, JHCPBG will ensure knowledge sharing is carried out regularly and throughout the duration of the TSE works, internally with the JHCPBG project team, with parent companies, and with key stakeholders and the wider infrastructure industry. This will ensure that lessons learnt are implemented across the TSE Worksites, assist in contributing to knowledge and capacity building, and assist in a larger market shift towards sustainable infrastructure. Knowledge sharing processes are iterative and evolve as the project progresses. Some key examples of knowledge sharing initiatives to be adopted by JHCPBG are detailed in Table 3. Table 3: Examples of JHCPBG sustainability knowledge sharing initiatives Audience Internal (JHCPBG) Parent organisations Knowledge sharing initiatives Tunnel Times (TSE Works newsletter) - an internal monthly newsletter will be used to communicate with all staff and workforce across the TSE Worksites. It will feature stories on key milestones, site progress updates, and corporate messages and initiatives from safety, environment, sustainability, quality, human resource, and community teams. It will also feature a message each month from the TSE Works Project Director. This helps to reinforce the Staying Head of the Game vision and values which drive the required behaviours on the project and celebrates the One Team culture and achievements on the project. Tunnel Vision internal television program JHCPBG prepare a regular (usually weekly) television program that provides the project team with an update on status of work across the project. The program is also used to share safety and environment messages, good news stories, and details of competitions and fundraising initiatives. It is prepared by the project team for the project team and is broadcast across the TSE Worksites and accessible via Oris-SharePoint. JHCPBG Health, Safety, Environment, Quality and Community Meeting - A fortnightly meeting is attended by the Construction Director, Construction s, Project s, Superintendents and Functional s including the Approvals, Environment and Sustainability. The objective of this meeting is to discuss actions, incidents, complaints and non-conformances, share lessons learnt and prevent reoccurrence at all worksites. The CPB IS Network - The will participate in the CPB IS Network, which has been developed as a forum for information sharing and to provide IS rating support. Where relevant, the project will share updates, lessons learnt, key achievements and challenges with the network to facilitate learning, knowledge sharing and capability building across CPB IS project SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 3 of 4

24 PART A - OVERVIEW Audience Key stakeholders Wider industry Knowledge sharing initiatives teams. Minutes from the network are provided as documentation following every teleconference along with contact and networking details for all current IS projects. This network will be facilitated by the CPB Group Energy & Sustainability. John Holland (JH) Sustainability Operations Networking Group (SONG) The will participate in this JH networking group, which, as with the CPB IS Network, has been developed as a forum for information sharing and to provide IS rating support. This networking group is carried out and documented in a similar manner to the CPB IS Network. TfNSW Sustainability Forum as set out in Section 3.3, TfNSW will establish and lead a bimonthly Sustainability Forum. Sustainability managers from each major delivery package for the Sydney Metro City and Southwest will attend and participate in the sustainability forum to ensure knowledge sharing and collaboration. The forum will also be attended by the ISCA Case and TfNSW representatives. Sustainability achievements will be communicated to the local community using a range of different media, including newsletters, community open days, and the Project Website. Subcontractor and supplier training JHCPBG will provide opportunities to TSE subcontractors and suppliers to increase their understanding of sustainability in (see Section ). Industry Conferences and Workshops The Approvals, Environment and Sustainability, and/or other relevant personnel may present on sustainability initiatives and lessons learnt at relevant industry conferences. Case Studies JHCPBG may work collaboratively with TfNSW and regulatory agencies to prepare case studies to document specific sustainability initiatives and lessons learnt. These case studies should be published on the internet to allow knowledge to be shared across the industry. 4.3 Sustainability Data Capture and Reporting To monitor the consumption of resources (including energy, water and materials) and the generation of waste, JHCPBG has established and will implement a monthly monitoring program, where data will be collected from various sources across the TSE Works, collated and reported as per TSE Works and parent company reporting requirements. JHCPBG s sustainability reporting requirements are outlined in Part B, Element 3 Monitoring, modelling and reporting. Table 4 lists the categories and types of data that JHCPBG collect to meet TSE Works reporting requirements. Table 4: Categories and types of sustainability data captured for reporting purposes Category Type Electricity usage Non-renewable Renewable SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 4 of 4

25 PART A - OVERVIEW Category Fuel Type Used for: Mobile plant Stationary plant On road vehicles Lubricants and solvents Oil Grease Solvents Fuel types tracked: Diesel Biodiesel (5%) Biodiesel (other blend) Unleaded petrol Petrol (ethanol blends) LPG Water Potable i.e. drinking water, fire hydrant Non-potable i.e. water from sediment basin, water treatment plant, water from excavations Materials Concrete Steel Wood Aggregate Asphalt Piping Etc. Waste Sent to landfill Recycled Treated Waste classifications tracked: General solid waste Construction and demolition waste Office waste Restricted Waste Asbestos Waste Hazardous Waste Other waste (e.g. liquid waste) JHCPBG has developed a robust data capture and reporting process utilising the TSE Works Oris-SharePoint system. Use of this system has simplified the process for gathering and analysing sustainability data, which is typically complex due to due to the multitude of data sources that need to be captured and examined. The TSE Works comprises twelve separate worksites and many subcontractors (currently over 40 subcontractors have been flagged for reporting), resulting in large quantities of data being collected, collated, analysed, and reported. The reporting system used on TSE was built in response to these challenges, as well as lessons learnt from previous projects, including the Sydney Metro Northwest TSC Works. Environment and sustainability data capture processes tend to rely on multiple software systems and often involve double-handling of data. This can be inefficient and may result in increased errors in captured data. It also presents challenges when integrating and analysing SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 5 of 4

26 PART A - OVERVIEW data for reporting. One of the main challenges in this space is managing subcontractor reporting. These issues can be further complicated on joint venture projects where parent company management systems are often amalgamated, and software is mixed and matched based on the preferences of the joint venture team. The system developed by JHCPBG for TSE responds to these challenges and is effectively a one-stop-shop for data capture and analysis. JHCPBG s sustainability data capture and reporting process is summarised in the Sustainability Data Capture and Reporting Procedure (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-MPR-00307). The below provides a description of this process Sustainability data capture All sustainability data from JHCPBG and its subcontractors is entered into SharePoint using an electronic form, and the data is stored as a database. This includes resource usage and waste data, as outlined in Table 4. Subcontractors are required to report sustainability data on a monthly basis and one month in lag. This is detailed in the Subcontractor Pack and is a requirement of their TSE Works subcontract. Subcontractors are provided with Oris- SharePoint accounts that allow them to enter their reporting data straight into the system. JHCPBG data comes primarily from invoices and tracking registers. Invoices are provided by Site Administrators to the Environment and Sustainability Team and are entered into SharePoint using the electronic form. Waste and spoil tracking information is collated in accordance with the reporting categories required by TfNSW s Sustainability Reporting Form and entered into SharePoint Data analysis Data entered into the Oris-SharePoint system is linked to the TSE Works Environment and Sustainability Reporting Register (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-REG-06095), a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet used to analyse the data. This register is automatically updated as new data is entered into the SharePoint system. The register sets out sustainability data by month to facilitate monthly sustainability reporting requirements (see Section 4.3.4). The system has also been established to automatically calculate and populate data for the various reporting processes JHCPBG must complete. This includes the TfNSW monthly sustainability report, NGERS reporting through John Holland, and parent company reporting to CPB. The automatic calculations have been achieved using set formulas, which amalgamate and distribute data in line with the different requirements and categories used in each reporting process. This prevents the need to enter data into multiple systems and removes the risk of errors associated with double handling of data. This system has allowed for increased efficiency, reliability and validity of the sustainability data collection process, and enables us to easily: Track data collected from across the TSE Worksites and reported by subcontractors Review and validate data, including the ability to pin point potential errors Collate reported data to fulfil client and parent company reporting requirements Maintain direct control over the system with the ability to edit and correct data as needed, ensuring all data required to meet TSE reporting requirements is captured. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 6 of 4

27 PART A - OVERVIEW Data verification and validation One of greatest benefits of JHCPBG s sustainability data capture system is the increased reliability of the data collected, and the ability to quickly and easily review and validate these data. As noted above, the TSE Works comprises twelve separate worksites and many subcontractors (currently over 40 subcontractors have been flagged for reporting), resulting in large quantities of data being collected, collated, analysed, and reported. The use of the electronic reporting form and centralised reporting system simplifies this process. The completeness, quality and reliability of data is maximised because: Online entry of data directly into the reporting system minimises the risk of errors as it eliminates double-handling associated with transposing written information The system allows the user to view all data entered by specific entities at specific times, clearly highlighting where data is missing and where follow up is required Use of set formulas to collate and calculate data for various reporting outputs creates a consistent, automated method that reduces the risk of human error. Despite the abovementioned efficiencies and assurances, there is still a level of risk associated with errors in data capture and analysis. These risks are outlined in Table 5, along with mitigation measures adopted by JHCPBG to reduce the level of risk Table 5: Risks and mitigation measures associated with TSE sustainability data reliability and validity Reporting entity JHCPBG Data error risk Input error when entering data from an invoice or register into the online Oris- SharePoint reporting form Mitigation strategies Verifying data by double checking data entered into the online reporting system before hitting submit High risk or complex data entered (such as waste data) is reviewed by the Project Sustainability Attaching a copy of the associated data source (e.g. invoice or register file) to the online reporting form Undertaking quarterly spot checks of data entered into the system, checking entered data against the attached data source. Where errors are found, the number and frequency of checks conducted will be increased. All data entry into the system for JHCPBG is undertaken by the Environment and Sustainability Team. This ensures the person inputting the data understands the purpose and process and is able to interrogate the data in line with their understanding of sustainability principles and reporting requirements. Independent review of data capture system and processes by suitably qualified person in line with ISCA credit Ene- SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 7 of 4

28 PART A - OVERVIEW Reporting entity Subcontractor/ supplier Data error risk Calculation errors when amalgamating and analysing reported data Data is missed for a certain period Input errors by subcontractors Mitigation strategies All data reported into Oris-SharePoint is linked to a centralised Excel spreadsheet, which is automatically updated Fixed formulas are established within the centralised spreadsheet that perform calculations with the reported data for entry into reporting outputs (e.g. calculation of recycling percentages, carbon emissions calculations, etc.) Formulas reviewed initially to ensure they are correct and are then fixed to allow consistency of data calculations. Review involves double checking elements of the formulas and reviewing outputs to check they are meaningful and anticipated based on the activities being carried out on site. The latter step can be made easier by visualising the data graphically to clearly observe trends and judge whether these are in line with the program of works and are comparable to data from previous similar projects. Independent review of data capture system and processes by suitably qualified person in line with ISCA credit Ene- Centralised reporting spreadsheet is set up to show all data types entered across all reporting periods in a matrix. This allows the user to view data entered and easily recognise where data is missing from a particular source for a particular reporting period. Where data is missing, this can be followed up with the associated JHCPBG Site Team. The TSE report spreadsheet is directly linked to the online reporting system and is automatically updated to include new data entered into the system. This allows for live tracking of data. Independent review of data capture system and processes by suitably qualified person in line with ISCA credit Ene- Checking data entered by subcontractors to ensure it is in the correct unit of measurement. This can be achieved by comparing against data reported for previous months of between subcontractors undertaking similar works. Having a central point of contact with each subcontractor to make it easier to follow up regarding data inconsistencies or errors Viewing data entered graphically to identify where there are outliers or inconsistencies in SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 8 of 4

29 PART A - OVERVIEW Reporting entity Data error risk Data is missed for a certain period Subcontractors refusing to complete monthly reporting Mitigation strategies trends. These can be further investigate by interrogating individual data points to identify data that falls outside of a range expected based on the activities being carried out by the subcontractor and comparing against similar subcontractor data. Conducting quarterly reviews of data entered by subcontractors delivering high materiality work packages (see Section 5.6), and assessing data entered against information provided as part of claims (e.g. fuel dockets). Independent review of data capture system and processes by suitably qualified person in line with ISCA credit Ene- Subcontractor Monthly Environment and Sustainability Reporting Guidance (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-MAN ) provided to subcontractors to guide them on how to use the online reporting form. Centralised reporting spreadsheet is set up to show all data entered by each subcontractor across all reporting periods in a matrix. This allows the user to view data entered and easily recognise where data is missing from a particular subcontractor for a particular reporting period. Where data is missing, this can be followed up with the associated subcontractor. Having a central point of contact with each subcontractor to make it easier to follow up regarding absence of data. The requirement for completing monthly reporting has been included in the Subcontractor Pack, which is part of the contract document. As such, the subcontractor is commercially obligated to carry out reporting as required by JHCPBG. Issuing commercial notices or withholding subcontractor payment if the subcontractor is refusing to report sustainability data Reporting requirements JHCPBG are required to report on sustainability data through the following channels: Monthly sustainability reporting to TfNSW JHCPBG is required to provide a monthly sustainability report to TfNSW, including provision of sustainability data. Data is provided using the TfNSW Sustainability Reporting form. Sustainability data is reported with a lag of one month to allow adequate time for accurate data collection, e.g. invoice receipt and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 9 of 4

30 PART A - OVERVIEW processing. Delays in invoicing will likely impact reporting. Where accurate reporting data is not available at the time of reporting and accurate estimates are possible, such estimates will be used and data then reconciled in the following report month. Quarterly NGERS reporting to John Holland JHCPBG is required to report sustainability data to John Holland to fulfil reporting requirements under the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Scheme (NGERS). John Holland uses Project Pack Web (PPW) to carry out NGERS reporting, and JHCPBG has established a system to bulk-import data collected in SharePoint into PPW. This has allowed JHCPBG to set up an all-in-one project reporting system, while still being able to easily satisfy parent company reporting requirements. Annual reporting JHCPBG will prepare an annual report for each financial year over which the TSE Works is carried out. This report will provide a summary of sustainability performance on the TSE Works and may facilitate senior management and stakeholder review of such performance. CERT reporting The SWTC requires JHCPBG to use TfNSW s Carbon Estimate and Reporting Tool (CERT) to estimate the TSE Works greenhouse gas footprint during design and report on actual emissions during. Further detail about CERT reporting requirements are provided in Section 6.6 of this Plan. ISCA ratings submissions As outlined in Section 4.5, JHCPBG is required to obtain an ISCA rating for the TSE Works for the Design and As-Built phases. Sustainability data captured by JHCPBG will be used to support preparation of the TSE Works ISCA rating submissions TfNSW Air Emission Data Collection Workbook (9TP-FT-439) The SWTC requires JHCPBG to complete this workbook at the start of the TSE Works and then annually. The workbook aims to provide information on the performance of mobile non-road diesel equipment used by delivery contractors against US EPA, EU, or equivalent emissions standards. 4.4 Review, auditing and continual improvement 4.4. Sustainability performance review Sustainability performance will be reviewed monthly with the JHCPBG Senior Leadership Team (SLT) and reported in the monthly sustainability report. In addition, sustainability performance will be reviewed formally each year by the SLT and documented in an annual sustainability performance report. This review and reporting regime is in line with the requirements of ISCA credit Man Sustainability audits JHCPBG s sustainability auditing process is outlined in Part B Element 4 Auditing, review and improvement. JHCPBG s sustainability management system will be independently audited at least annually during of the TSE Works. Further to this, JHCPBG will meet auditing requirements of the Further to this, audits and reviews will be carried out in line with the requirements of the ISCA IS Rating Tool version., including: Independent Sustainability Professional (ISP) reviews under credit Man-3 Organisational structure, and roles and responsibilities SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 30 of 4

31 PART A - OVERVIEW Environment and sustainability audits, including independent and internal, under credit Man-4 Inspection and auditing Auditing of the TSE Works carbon and energy modelling and monitoring processes for credit Ene- Energy and carbon monitoring and reduction Six monthly waste to destination audits required under credit Was- Waste management Timing of sustainability audits, including those required to meet the requirements of the ISCA IS Rating, is detailed in the TSE Combined Audit Schedule (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PM- SCH-08003), and excerpt of which is provided in Appendix B Sustainability inspections Sustainability compliance monitoring onsite will be undertaken using two types of sustainability inspections, which will be carried out throughout the delivery of the TSE Works. These inspections are:. Weekly environment and sustainability inspections, which will be carried out by personnel in the TSE Environment and Sustainability Team using the Environment and Sustainability Inspection Field Form (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-FRM ). This process is detailed in the CEMP. The sustainability component of the inspection will focus on initiatives to reduce both environmental and social impacts, and where required actions may be raised to address any issues identified.. Detailed sustainability inspections, which are predominately carried out by the Sustainability Team to assess the implementation of sustainability initiatives and compliance with sustainability requirements at the TSE Worksites. These inspections are recorded using the Detailed Sustainability Inspection Form (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM- FRM-00477). The form also allows for raising actions to target areas for improvement to work towards meeting sustainability requirements and targets. Sustainability inspections and associated actions raised are recorded and closed out in Project Pack Web. This sustainability inspection regimes has been developed in line with the requirements of ISCA credit Man review JHCPBG will develop, amend and update this throughout the duration of the TSE Works, and at least annually. As part of this process, the following aspects will be considered: New elements of the Project Works and Temporary Works not covered by the existing Sustainability Plan; and Changes in sequencing or methodology Updates to this Plan and/or associated plans may also occur in response to corrective actions raised in response to audits or inspections. Procedures for corrective actions are addressed in the CEMP. The key aim of sustainability audit processes is to share information and capture lessons learnt. The Combined Audit Schedule (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PM- SCH-08003) includes all sustainability audits including ISCA review and auditing requirements, as per Part B Element.3 of the CEMP. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 3 of 4

32 PART A - OVERVIEW 4.5 IS rating for Design and As-Built JHCPBG has entered into a ratings agreement with ISCA to obtain an Infrastructure Sustainability rating for the TSE Works. In accordance with SWTC Appendix A.7 Clause (d), TfNSW will pay the registration fee. Through implementation of the IS process, JHCPBG is helping to ensure that best practice becomes standard practice, industry-wide. JHCPBG will track progress towards obtaining ISCA ratings for Design and As-Built using the TSE Works SharePoint system. The rating process is completed in the following phases, as illustrated in Figure 4:. Weightings assessment highlights the materiality of rating credits in the context of the project. An initial Weightings Assessment has been completed for the TSE Works by TfNSW and will be reviewed by JHCPBG as design is developed (see Appendix C). It will be updated by JHCPBG as necessary and submitted to ISCA for verification prior to submission of the TSE Works IS Design Rating submission.. Base Case Proposal sets out the project scope and boundaries, and proposes business as usual (BAU) assumptions to be used in resource use modelling for ISCA credits Ene-, Wat-, Wat-, and Mat-. The Base Case Proposal is to be prepared by JHCPBG and verified by ISCA for reference in the project IS rating. 3. Design rating self-assessment, independent verification and certification 4. As-Built rating self-assessment, independent verification and certification. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 3 of 4

33 PART A - OVERVIEW Figure 4: Indicative ISCA Process flow chart SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 33 of 4

34 PART A - OVERVIEW 4.5. IS Rating target In line with the requirements of Condition E7 of the Project Planning Approval and the SWTC Appendix A.7, JHCPBG is targeting an ISCA rating score of 65 for Design and As Built. This aligns with the Excellent rating level. Despite this, JHCPBG has developed this sustainability management system to maximise its ISCA rating score and seeks to emulate the performance exhibited on the Sydney Metro Northwest TSC Works, which achieved a Design rating of 83 and an As Built rating of Functional responsibilities for ISCA credits By its nature, the implementation of sustainability strategies on an infrastructure project requires participation by key representatives from all functional areas across the project. This is particularly true for the development of an ISCA design submission, which covers myriad project aspects and requires input from personnel across the project team. Table 6 outlines the key functional areas that the Sustainability Team may need to collaborate with to address the requirements of the rating categories in the ISCA IS Rating Tool version.. Table 6: Functional area input required for completion of ISCA rating submission Theme Categories TSE functional area input Management & Governance Management Systems Procurement & Purchasing Climate Change Adaptation Quality Team Environment Team Senior Leadership Team Commercial Team Procurement Design Team Flood Design Lead Interface Team Using Resources Energy & Carbon Design Team Construction Team Plant Finance and Admin Team Emissions, Pollution & Waste Water Materials Discharges to Air, Land & Water Land Construction Team Plant Utilities Lead Environment Team Finance and Admin Team Design Team Construction Team Finance and Admin Team Environment Team Design Team Construction Team Design Team SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 34 of 4

35 PART A - OVERVIEW Theme Categories TSE functional area input Environment Team Waste Environment Team Construction Team Spoil Ecology Ecology Environment Team People & Place Community Health, Wellbeing & Safety Heritage Stakeholder Participation Urban & Landscape Design Stakeholder and Community Relations Team Safety Team Environment Team Stakeholder and Community Relations Team Stakeholder and Community Relations Team Interface Team JHCPBG is seeking to scope out this category on the basis that the TSE Works has no permanent urban design or landscaping elements, consistent with the approach adopted on the Sydney Metro Northwest TSC Works. Innovation Innovation Input may be required from across the entire TSE Works project team, dependent upon the nature of innovations proposed Mandatory ISCA rating credits In addition to attaining a minimum IS Rating score of 65, sections (f) and (h) of the TSE Works SWTC Appendix A.7 require that JHCPBG attains a specified rating level for a number of key ISCA rating credits as part of its Design and As Built ratings. Table 7 details those ISCA credits that have been prescribed as mandatory in the SWTC, and the associated achievement level required to be met. Cross references are included in the table to those sections of this Plan that detail JHCPBG s sustainability management strategies that contribute to achieving these ISCA credits. Table 7: Mandatory ISCA rating credits, as specified in SWTC Appendix A.7 Rating Credit Required achievement level Cross reference Design Ene- Level, demonstrating a greenhouse gas emissions reduction of 0% below a base case footprint. Section 6.0 Ene- Level, to fully investigate opportunities for use of renewable energy. Section 6.0 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 35 of 4

36 PART A - OVERVIEW Rating Credit Required achievement level Cross reference Wat- Wat- Mat- Level, demonstrating a reduction in water use of 0% compared to a base case footprint. Level, demonstrating that at least 33% of water used is from non-potable sources. Level, demonstrating a 5% reduction in materials lifecycle impacts compared to a base case footprint. Section 5. Section 5. Section 7.0 Pro- Level Section 5.6 Pro- Level 3 Section 5.6 As Built Ene- Level, demonstrating a greenhouse gas emissions reduction of 0% below a base case footprint. Section 6.0 Ene- Wat- Wat- Mat- Level, to fully investigate opportunities for use of renewable energy. Level, demonstrating a reduction in water use of 0% compared to a base case footprint. Level, demonstrating that at least 33% of water used is from non-potable sources. Level, demonstrating a 5% reduction in materials lifecycle impacts compared to a base case footprint. Section 6.0 Section 5. Section 5. Section 7.0 Pro- Level Section 5.6 Pro- Level 3 Section 5.6 Pro-3 Level 3 Section 5.6 Pro-4 Level Section 5.6 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 36 of 4

37 PART A - OVERVIEW 5.0 Key sustainability aspects 5. Climate change resilience JHCPBG will undertake a climate change risk review in line with the guidance and requirements in TfNSW's Climate Change Risk Assessment Guideline 06 and the Climate Change Adaptation category in the ISCA IS Rating Tool version. Technical Manual. This risk analysis will involve review of the Sydney Metro City & Southwest Climate Resilience Report, prepared by TfNSW in August 06 based on the Project s Reference Design. Climate-based risks identified have been considered at early concept design and are being addressed in the development of detailed design. A multidisciplinary review will be carried out of the risks relevant to the TSE Works package. The risk review process will be carried out collaboratively with key JHCPBG personnel, including the Design Team. This will be undertaken during design development to ensure all other relevant risks are identified and considered. As a function of this climate risk and adaptation process, any risk identified as 'extreme' and 'high', and 5% of risks identified as medium, using AS/NZS ISO 3000 Risk management principles and guidelines, will be treated. Previous adaptation measures incorporated into TfNSW's concept design will be tracked. The resultant report will include discussion on modelling conducted and mitigation measures implemented to address those climate change risks identified as relevant to the TSE Works scope. Initial review identifies that the majority of the climate change risks relevant to the TSE Works are related to flood management. Flooding has been addressed for the TSE Works design and in the following documents: Stormwater and Flooding Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-DN-PLN-00003) Flooding and Hydrology Report (SMCSWTSE-JAB-TPW-DR-RPT-05000) Marrickville Earthworks and Drainage Flood Modelling (SMCSWTSE-JAB-DSY-DR- RPT-05000) 5. Water efficiency 5.. Water balance A water balance estimation has been carried out as part of early design development and planning. The water balance was generated by analysing the TSE Works water needs to identify opportunities for potable water replacement with non-potable water and for minimising water needs, with the goal to understand those aspects of the system that have high materiality. The TSE Works water demand is illustrated in Figure 5 and detailed in Table 8. From this it is apparent that the areas of water usage are for station box dust suppression and slurry management, followed by grout plant operations and tunnel TBM cooling. Table 8 also highlights those aspects of the TSE Works where potable water can be replaced with water from non-potable sources (e.g. reused water treated by onsite water treatment plants, rainwater, or water recycling/recirculation). It is estimated that 40% of the TSE Works water needs could be sourced from non-potable sources, and the greatest opportunity for non-potable water replacement aligns with those two activities with the highest water demand: station box dust suppression and slurry SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 37 of 4

38 PART A - OVERVIEW management, and tunnel TBM cooling. Given the magnitude of these components, other elements such as rainwater harvesting and reuse of water used in concrete production operations, are dwarfed in comparison when modelled. A replacement of potable water with non-potable water of 40% achieves Level. for ISCA credit Wat- (which is scored on a sliding scale). TSE Water Demand AB grout plant 9% Precast (curing) 0% Precast (batch plant) % Site maintenance 7% Civil (site establishment) 5% Amenities (tunnel) % Tunnel dust suppression (inc. washboxes) and slurry management 8% Amenities (above ground) % Tunnel TBM cooling 9% Station box dust suppression (inc. washboxes) and slurry management 38% Figure 5: TSE Works water demand summary chart The estimations in Table 8 have also been presented as a waterfall chart in Figure 6. This chart highlights a reduction in water needs of about 5%, which aligns with Level 3 for ISCA credit Wat-. JHCPBG adopts an integrated approach with design teams to incorporate sustainability requirements in design packages. Through this process, opportunities to reduce potable water consumption and maximise water reuse are being identified, some examples of which are detailed in Section 5... This approach to managing water on site will drive a more holistic understanding of water demands and potential sources and provides opportunities to find ways to minimise water use across the TSE Works. The water balance will be further refined following completion of detailed design to reflect updates to the scope of the TSE Works and any refinements in methodology that influence water use and reuse. During the process, potable water will be metered and a tracking system applied for use of non-potable sources, e.g. recycled water reused within TSE worksites to enable tracking of performance against the revised water balance estimates. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 38 of 4

39 PART A - OVERVIEW Table 8: Indicative TSE Water Balance summary Below Ground Construction Above Ground Construction Demand Water source Detailed Water Breakdown Water demand (kl) % Potable (kl) % Non-potable (kl) - recycled water and rainwater % Tunnel dust suppression (inc. washboxes) and slurry management 07,309 8% 9,586 7% 4,73 % Station box dust suppression (inc. washboxes) and slurry management 58,94 38% 430,77 3% 98,5 7% Tunnel TBM cooling 67,466 9%,675 0% 64,79 9% Amenities (tunnel) 9,454 % 9,454 % 0 0% Civil (site establishment) 75,600 5% 60,480 4% 5,0 % Site maintenance 95,400 7% 6,500 % 5,300 0% Precast (batch plant) 33,57 % 6,8 % 6,705 0% Precast (curing) 5,088 0% 5,088 0% 0 0% AB grout plant 70,000 9% 70,000 9% 0 0% Amenities (above ground) 7,556 % 7,556 % 0 0% Total water,40,34 00% 946,8 67% 399,600 8% Total possible non-potable water use (inc. re-use) 967,389 Non-Potable Proposed 390,068 40% Potable only demand (due to WHS and functional requirements) 409,408 Total water sourced from potable mains,00,55 60% SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 39 of 4

40 PART A - OVERVIEW Figure 6: Preliminary TSE Works water balance illustrating potable water reduction and replacement SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 40 of 4

41 PART A - OVERVIEW 5.. Water use minimisation and reuse The following water use minimisation and reuse measures will be implemented: Use water-efficient fixtures and fittings to reduce water usage from the demand side and increase self-sufficiency from non-potable water supplies. Site amenities will be fitted out with water-efficient fixtures and fittings in the showers, basins and waterless urinals, where practicable. External water fittings, such as hoses in wash-down areas, will be fitted with trigger nozzles. Procurement of recycled water (non-potable) as a substitute for potable water has been thoroughly investigated and no viable sources identified. This also involved contacting the Discovery Point Water Treatment facility to ascertain quality, availability and vicinity to the TSE Works sites. The requirement to transport large quantities by road over a significant distance and availability constraints have meant this option does not offer a practical alternative and no further investigations will take place. TBM cooling water will be recirculated via ground-level cooling stations. In maintaining a closed loop cooling system, we can achieve a large reduction in potable water use. Construction water (surface and ground water) will be reused on site, where practicable, for management activities in preference to off-site discharge (i.e. dust suppression). Reuse a minimum of 80% of concrete production operation water into concrete production at on-site or off-site batching plants for all concrete used on the TSE Works. 5.3 Waste and materials reduction The TSE Works Materials Management Plan, detailed in Section 7.0 of this Plan, outlines JHCPBG s approach to utilising sustainably sourced materials and identifying and implementing materials reduction strategies. The waste minimisation and management strategy to be adopted during the TSE Works is detailed in the Construction Waste and Recycling Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-000). JHCPBG will conduct audits of waste receival sites in line with the requirements of ISCA credit Was- Waste management. This includes auditing of waste generated by JHCPBG during delivery of the TSE Works to its final destination. Audits will be conducted 6-monthly from commencement of and receival sites will be selected for auditing based on the significant waste streams being generated by JHCPBG at the time. 5.4 Community benefit JHCPBG's Community Communication Strategy (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-SH-PLN-046) outlines the extensive measures we will use to directly reduce the impacts of on our stakeholders. These include communication, alternative respite offers and other mitigations. The Strategy also describes the important function of building a broader understanding of how the Sydney Metro will support the sustainable growth of Sydney. JHCPBG will support the education and community awareness programs through site visits, open days, local newsletters, media events and any other coverage of the TSE Works, as well as providing photography, video and time-lapse footage for use in communications to a wide range of community groups. JHCPBG s Workforce Development and Industry Participation Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-HR-PLN-0044) provides detailed information on many initiatives that will leave a SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 4 of 4

42 PART A - OVERVIEW long-term community benefit in building industry capability, including growing the representation and skills of disadvantaged groups. Community benefit initiatives outlined in Targets 8 and 9 in Element Sustainability Targets are targeted at disadvantaged communities and groups most affected by the TSE Works. These initiatives may include: Public art commissioning at Marrickville and Waterloo (subject to stakeholder agreement), preferably by local artists, which can provide a three-fold benefit in improving amenity and activating community spaces, deterring vandalism, and providing income to local artists. This is in line with JHCPBG s motivation to leave a positive legacy by investing in community life while constructing the TSE Works. Subject to TfNSW approval, JHCPBG will engage with Inner West Council to identify opportunities to develop the talents of local street artists with the aim of using street art on site hoardings and structures. JHCPBG will provide resource support packages for 0 disadvantaged local students to provide books and tools to undertake -related training or education. The Blues Point community, which receives no direct benefit from the Sydney Metro once it opens, temporarily loses the use of some public space during the works. The heritage of the local area will be the focus of a permanent heritage interpretation to benefit future users of the rehabilitated Blues Point Reserve. Two day care centres located near the works will be offered new herb gardens. JHCPBG will continue its long-term commitment to major fundraising by its staff, workforce and Subcontractors for the benefit of Bear Cottage; a charity that supports NSW children with life-limiting illnesses and their families. The TSE Works will work closely with the Senior Stakeholder and Community Relations to work towards implementing these and other community initiatives identified during delivery of the TSE Works. 5.5 Pollution control Building on our award-winning performance on Sydney Metro Northwest, we have developed an Environment Management System (EMS) using the same frameworks in the CEMP. We have successfully implemented and continually improved this EMS on many projects, including the TSC Works and the Glenfield to Leppington Rail Line. JHCPBG will achieve the values and percentages identified in Element Sustainability Targets though the following initiatives: Minimise potential for water pollution through development and implementation of proactive site-specific erosion, sedimentation and water management strategies Minimise dust and vehicle emissions through: - Use of recycled water to suppress dust - Use of excavators and mobile cranes that comply with USEPA Tier 4 exhaust emissions standards, if onsite for more than three months and if practicable Minimise noise and vibration impacts through: SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 4 of 4

43 PART A - OVERVIEW - Proactive and proven approach to modelling noise and vibration impacts to select the optimum suite of mitigation measures - Independent peer review of noise and vibration models - Proactive community consultation and comprehensive complaints management Light pollution reduction via hoarding around compounds and inward facing spotlights Use low volatile organic compounds (VOC) adhesives and sealants and low emission formaldehyde composite wood products Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) to be sourced from suppliers or manufacturers that comply with the Green Building Council of Australia's Best Practice Guidelines for PVC in the Built Environment All surface coatings will comply with Australian Paint Approval Scheme (APAS) Volatile Organic Compounds Limits. 5.6 Sustainable procurement and supply chain 5.6. Overview Sustainable procurement involves an organisation using its purchasing power to achieve environmental and social benefits, and at the same time reducing costs. It is JHCPBG s intention to influence standard procurement practices and procedures to ensure compliance with the Project Deed, SWTC and the International Guidance Standard ISO 0400:07 Sustainable Procurement Guidance. The International Guidance Standard states that sustainable procurement represents an opportunity to provide more value to the organisation by improving productivity, assessing value and performance, enabling communication between purchasers, suppliers and all stakeholders, and by encouraging innovation. JHCPBG s procurement process broadly follows the process detailed in Figure 7 (below). JHCPBG initially adopted the British Standard for Sustainable Procurement BS: 8903: Principles and Framework for Procuring Sustainably to formulate a framework for the TSE Works, as this was the most comprehensive standard available at the time the project systems were being developed. This framework provides project stakeholders a guide to how sustainable practices, and associated risks and opportunities, will be considered in the context of the scope of works and what process will be put in place to manage these risks and opportunities. In light of the release of the International Guidance Standard on Sustainable Procurement in 07, JHCPBG has reviewed its sustainable procurement framework and processes and has found these to be generally in accordance with the new standard. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 43 of 4

44 PART A - OVERVIEW Figure 7: Sustainable procurement process overview 5.6. Procurement process To ensure a sustainable supply chain and procurement practices we will adopt the fundamental principles of fairness, openness, non-discrimination and competition. We will incorporate practices such as risk management and supplier engagement, using BS8903 Principles and Framework for Procuring Sustainably as a benchmark Materiality Materiality in procurement is the relative consideration of a procurement package for its anticipated impact on the projects Key Performance Indicators or targets. For the TSE Works KPI s and targets have been identified and agreed during the package tendering process and have been documented in this Plan. The key steps identified to move towards a more sustainable procurement process are detailed in Table 9. Table 9: Steps towards more sustainable procurement process Activity How Sustainable Procurement may be Achieved Early contractor engagement Suppliers will be engaged during project tendering phase to identify not only the markets ability to meet certain requirements but also bring innovation to the project and address any long lead times associated with unusual specifications or services. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 44 of 4

45 PART A - OVERVIEW Activity Review key contracting and procurement decision-making against The TfNSW Sustainability requirements (as agreed during Package tendering process) and highlevel TSE Works risks. Effective targets and objectives are identified, and reporting is established. Employment of a skilled procurement and contract management team with substantial experience in sustainable procurement, contract management and contract administration. Establish robust and wellunderstood procurement processes and ensure that there is an agreed approach for the TSE Works Development of good communication between the project team and contractors so any issues arising under contracts are identified and addressed early. How Sustainable Procurement may be Achieved For major procurement decisions, a check against the scope of works and specification as outlined in the Project Deed and SWTC and the Sydney Metro Sustainability Strategy will be undertaken to provide alignment on sustainable procurement (i.e. back-to-back requirements with subcontractors). Evaluation criteria for contracts will reflect JHCPBG s objectives beyond simple economic benefits such as environmental and social benefit to achieve alignment through supply chain and contracts. Focus on value for money processes to ensure information identification and capture. This also provides transparency and efficient flow of information to the project leadership team and other key stakeholders. Suppliers must be made aware of the TSE Works targets in terms of sustainable design and intent and strategy and targets. These objectives and targets must be passed onto the relevant suppliers and reporting structure put in place that reflects these. This saves time and effort and results in fewer errors in the procurement and administration process. It increases the probability of the Joint venture achieving its agreed targets and value for money outcomes. This allows for a smoother and efficient procurement process and clarity of the contract tendering, letting, administration, monitoring and payment processes. This promotes relationship building, information exchange and allows early identification of issues that can be addressed before they become major problems Procurement schedule A Procurement Schedule (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-CO-SCH-080) forms part of the Master Program of the Project. This is a live document and central to the management of the timely delivery of all goods and services for JHCPBG. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 45 of 4

46 PART A - OVERVIEW This Procurement Schedule initially forecasts when packages will reach various stages from completion of design documentation through to executed agreements. As the TSE Works progresses it becomes an historical document recording progress against the forecast. The procurement team will use the schedule to ensure that all parties in the development of specifications, work packages and tendering documentation can be effectively co-ordinated, allowing time for engagement with the supply chain, such as through and early contractor involvement (ECI) approach. The schedule is designed to provide a level of detail for each package including content, stages of the letting procedure, type of agreement to be entered into, tenderer identities, etc. This schedule has also been used to document where the scope of works of a particular package is deemed likely to have an impact on the overall achievement of the sustainability targets Subcontractor selection process An overview of the procurement process that will be implemented on the TSE Works is detailed in Figure 8. As part of the process detail in Figure 8 the following will be applied in procuring all supplier agreements and subcontracts: A Subcontractor Requirements Pack Environment and Sustainability (SMCSWTSE- JCG-TPW-EM-APP-00509) will be included in all tender requests to set out sustainability and workforce targets The Expression of Interest form (EOI) will request documentation and responses from the supplier/ subcontractor. This information will be analysed and used in the tender analysis process. Pre-award tender interview questionnaire will request additional information based on the responses provided in the EOI form. Environment, sustainability and workforce criteria will be used in selecting Subcontractors and suppliers Key sustainability and workforce requirements will be written into contracts where relevant. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 46 of 4

47 PART A - OVERVIEW START PROCUREMENT SCHEDULE Identify Works Packages for Tender EOI PROPOSAL FORM COMPLETED and EOI DOCUMENTS ISSUED Compilation of Potential Tenderers for the EOI list EOI Documents: Scope of works Conditions of EOI EOI Questionnaire EOI REVIEW Review of EOI submissions and update to EOI Register/ Panel TENDER DOCUMENTATION ISSUED Scope of works including: Pricing particulars Conditions of tender Stat declaration Tender submission Tender questionnaire Subcontractor Pack Draft Contract Terms & Conditions CONDITIONS OF TENDER AND FINAL REVIEW OF ALL TENDER DOCUMENTATION SCOPE OF WORKS AND PRICING PARTICULARS COMPLETED SUBCONTRACTOR PROPOSAL FORM COMPLETED Potential tenderers selected from the EOI register/ panel TENDER OPENING FORM AND ANALYSIS COMPLETED TENDER INTERVIEW (if required) REVIEW TENDER SUBMISSIONS/ CLARRIFICATIONS TENDER ANALYSIS REVISED (if required) CONTRACT EXECUTION AWARD PACKAGE Issue Contract to successful Tenderer CLIENT APPROVAL (if required) TENDER RECOMMENDATION COMPLETED TENDER OPENING FORM AND ANALYSIS COMPLETED UNSUCCESSFUL TENDERERS Notice issued to unsuccessful tenderers CONTRACT COMMITMENT PRE-START MEETING COMPLETED Construction Phase Starts Figure 8: Procurement process overview SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 47 of 4

48 PART A - OVERVIEW Subcontractor and supplier selection will be based on the quality of tender documentation received from the supplier against a set list of documents. Criteria will be utilised for the particular purchase requirement, with selection criteria addressing the business needs, including specification; purchase cost and can cover any sustainability requirements deemed significant to the specific scope of works including lifecycle costs. Selective identification of subcontracts with a high degree of materiality (high impact) to the JHCPBG sustainability program will be used to ensure that those contracts with the most influence are prioritised. High impact suppliers and service providers are identified in relation to the package of works being delivered with regards to work package value and level of environmental and social risk associated with the works. Regarding package value, work packages are considered if they fall within the top 90% of subcontract spend. Environmental and social risks associated with work packages are considered in line with the risks identified in the Project Wide Risk Register (PWRR). Work packages that have been identified as high impact include: Spoil haulage Concrete and shotcrete supply TBM supply Precast batch plant operations and concrete supply Acoustic shed supply and Plant supply, including water treatment plant, overhead cranes, and road headers Demolition works Barging works Piling Once identified the factors most commonly used will include, but not be limited to: Ability to supply (including lead times, track record) Quality of supply (including quality assurance) Fit to requirements Sustainability performance (including social and responsible sourcing initiatives) Service levels Financial stability Price Existing contractual relationship Other opportunities that the supplier may be aware which could lead to service or supply innovation. Selection of subcontractors and suppliers will include assessment against environment, sustainability and workforce criteria. This information is captured early in the procurement SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 48 of 4

49 PART A - OVERVIEW process during the expression of interest (EOI) phase. This phase acts as a prequalification process, where subcontractors and suppliers are required to complete multidisciplinary questionnaires as part of their EOI submissions, which cover relevant sustainability issues to the TSE Works. This process is further outlined in the Subcontractor Environment and Sustainability Requirements Pack (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-APP-00509). Indicative questionnaires used to assess subcontractors and suppliers on sustainability aspects relevant to the TSE Works is provided in Appendix D. EOI reviews are carried out by representatives from the Environment and Sustainability Team, including the Project Sustainability. Reviews are conducted in SharePoint, with environment and sustainability reviews also tracked in the TSE Works Environmental and Sustainability EOI Review Register (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-REG-068) Local resources and Industry Network Capability (ICN) JHCPBG will seek to promote and ensure full, fair and reasonable opportunity is provided to Australian businesses to supply goods and services to a project. This will include use of the Industry Capability Network (ICN) to advertise all procurement opportunities. This should achieve economic benefits associated with shorter supply chains and will strengthen the capacity of local suppliers. JHCPBG will also actively engage with Aboriginal enterprises using the Supply Nation network The procurement team will also seek to promote local content by analysing the local supplier market and checking compatibility of local components and equipment with technical specifications using such tools as the ICN. All materials will typically be sourced from single suppliers according to the following principles: Maximisation of local content Project requirements, including reliability of delivery, quality and program Competitiveness Industrial practicalities International compliance with local regulations and human rights standards Human rights issues, such as modern slavery, are gaining traction locally and around the world in the industry. For example, in early 07 the Australian government conducted an enquiry into an Australian Modern Slavery Act, based on the United Kingdom s Modern Slavery Act 05. Such legislation would lead to stringent reporting requirements for large companies on their supply chains. JHCPBG will assess compliance with local regulations and human rights standards for proposed supply contracts with a value over $5m where the proposed supplier undertakes some manufacturing in a developing country (as defined using the Australian Government s list). For identified packages JHCPBG will include: Questions on local compliance and human rights standards have been inserted into the tender questionnaire (Appendix D) covering: - Adoption of the International Labour Organisations Fundamental Conventions and commitment to the UN Global Compact principles SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 49 of 4

50 PART A - OVERVIEW - Local regulations and compliance - Internal and external assurance processes Ensure the environment and sustainability team is involved in the tender assessment process and that a person from the prospective company is interviewed on the answers provided, the Social Accountability SA 8000:04 standard will be used to guide the assessment and the equivalent of Social Fingerprint level 4 must be confirmed through the questionnaire and interview process Adopt compliance with local regulations and human rights as a pass/fail criteria in tender assessment. If satisfactory answers cannot be provided during tender the contract will not be awarded Adopt relevant clauses in subcontracts This approach sets a very low threshold for triggering the process application and does not rely on third party risk assessments to further refine high risk in terms of locality or industry (which could be biased, of limited scope or out of date). It also sets a very high compliance standard, with the use of pass/fail criteria sending the message to the industry that noncompliance is not acceptable Supply Chain Sustainability School Provide sustainability training to high impact category goods and services using the Supply Chain School online portal. This approach means the training legacy will extend beyond the TSE Works and across the industry. High impact goods and services are identified as having a potentially high environmental or social impact (see Section ) Tender evaluation and recommendation Once all tender responses are received, JHCPBG will analyse and document the details of each submission. The analysis will consider each offer from an overall technical, timeframe and commercial viewpoint, as well as from the financial aspect. The Contracts will coordinate with the respective design and staff to analyse and assess tenders in accordance with the Procurement Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-PR-PLN-0065) and Subcontractor Requirements Pack (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-CR- RPT-09500). Analysis results will be tabulated in a Tender Analysis sheet and processed for tender selection. This process has been modified to ensure that the analysis will provide a quantified approach to capturing the relative performance of suppliers against the project sustainability requirements. Once JHCPBG has analysed each tender response, selected subcontractors may be invited to attend an interview to discuss: Price Capability and historical performance Technical content including ability to meet any sustainability performance targets deemed to be impacted by the procurement package Aspects of the tender offer which differ from the requirements, where applicable. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 50 of 4

51 PART A - OVERVIEW The Subcontractor Tender Interview Questionnaire will be used as the interview template and will include responses from the subcontractor. Discussions at these interviews should be with the procurement team (or delegate) and area managers and/or the Contracts, as appropriate. When a subcontractor accepts all JHCPBG s terms and conditions, this interview is not necessary, at the discretion of the Contracts Performance monitoring As detailed in the Construction Environmental Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW- EM-PLN-0000) an audit program will be established. Inspections will also be undertaken in accordance with the Construction Environmental Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN Audit and inspections will include offsite inspection of fabricators, equipment and material suppliers premises. Auditors will be trained and be independent of the area audited. Management system audits may also be requested and arranged at any time by the JHCPBG. Audits will be documented and provided to personnel responsible for the particular area audited and reported to the relevant manager. Non-conformances arising from an audit, corrective action will be managed in accordance with the Construction Environmental Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0000). External compliance audits and surveillance of the management systems may be undertaken by external stakeholders or as required under the Project approval conditions for the relevant management system functions (quality, safety or environment). When notified by any external party of an impending audit, facilities and attendance by key personnel will be provided and arranged with the parties concerned Rewarding Sustainability Performance of Suppliers and Subcontractors Once suppliers and subcontractors have been engaged JHCPBG will reward the sustainability performance of suppliers and subcontractors through: Involvement in the Subcontractor Forums Considering their sustainability performance in the assessment of additional tender packages for the TSE Works Considering any sustainability innovations identified by subcontractors or suppliers. If these innovations are adopted the subcontractor or supplier may be incentivised. Considering sustainability performance in After Action Improvement Review which aim to capture lessons learnt and are shared with Parent Companies to assist in improving future performance on other relevant projects. 5.7 Temporary site facilities The design of temporary site facilities will incorporate energy efficiency initiatives, where reasonable and feasible. The following preferred specifications will be provided to suppliers: Energy efficient lighting and appliances, including new electrical equipment requiring market average star ratings Building fabric (high insulation R value) Natural day lighting and ventilation SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 5 of 4

52 PART A - OVERVIEW Water efficient fittings and rainwater capture, primarily to feed toilet flushing or similar non-potable uses Low ozone depleting potential and global warming potential heating ventilation and air conditioning systems Bicycle storage facilities, showers and change room facilities Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles Photovoltaic systems will be used on portable traffic management systems requiring power. The above does not apply where existing building and structures are used for temporary site facilities. If the specification cannot be met with existing stock, a simple cost benefit/payback on the outstanding item(s) will be undertaken to assess its ability to provide value for money within the life of the TSE Works. A strategy will be developed for temporary site facilities considering; lifecycle cost analysis, overshadowing and reuse of modular systems. This strategy will involve conducting a feasibility assessment for the installation of sustainability initiative such as renewable energy installations and rainwater harvesting and reuse solutions. Based on the strategy's findings, such initiatives will be implemented where practicable. The outcomes of the sustainable temporary site facilities strategy development will be reported separately. JHCPBG will monitor the establishment of temporary site facilities and the incorporation of sustainable aspects through site inspections (see Section 4.4.3). 5.8 Workforce development and industry participation The TSE Works Workforce Development and Industry Participation Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-HR-PLN-0044) has been developed in line with the TfNSW Workforce Development and Industry Participation Strategy. JHCPBG will be piloting the IS rating version.0 Workforce Sustainability category as part of ISCA s IS Innovation Challenges (IC-). 5.9 Green travel plan The location of the sites allows us to take advantage of very good public transport options and to encourage active transport participation. The Marrickville precast segment and dive site is one location where the promotion of ride sharing is feasible and likely, based on previous project experience, due to the structured nature of the segment factory operations. We will use a series of surveys to ascertain the travel habits of our workers in early and post promotion of green transport options. These surveys will then allow us to promote the best form of transport for each site and to provide relevant information for each site. This may include walking and cycling maps, public transport information in an easy to understand handout or identifying private car parking operations near the sites. Results of these surveys will be presented in a report. Sustainable travel options for each worksite are summarised in Table 0. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 5 of 4

53 PART A OVERVIEW Table 0 Sustainable transport options TSE Worksite Chatswood Limited car parking Footpaths generally in the area with signalised pedestrian crossings Crows Nest Limited car parking Footpaths generally in the area with signalised pedestrian crossings Victoria Cross Limited car parking Footpaths generally in the area with signalised pedestrian crossings Blues Point Limited car parking Footpaths generally in the area with pedestrian refuge islands Barangaroo Limited car parking Due to the ongoing, changes to footpaths occur constantly CBD Sites No car parking available Footpaths surrounding all sites with signalised pedestrian crossings Waterloo Limited car parking Footpaths and signalised pedestrian crossings available Marrickville Car parking available Footpaths surrounding site. Signalised crossing across Bedwin/ Edgeware Road with introduction of new traffic lights Low to moderate difficulty cycle lanes in surrounding area Low to moderate difficulty cycle lanes available Moderate to high difficulty cycle lanes available High difficulty cycle lane available Low difficulty cycle lanes available Segregated cycle lanes available in the CBD Low to moderate difficulty cycle lanes available Few cycle ways exist in this area, however, there is a shared use path which links to Sydenham Rd and train station Bus and train services at Chatswood Interchange Bus on Pacific Highway and train services at St Leonards (800 m) Numerous bus services and North Sydney train station McMahons Point ferry and bus services to North Sydney and the train station Bus services to Watsons Bay, CBD and 800 m to Wynyard Station. Ferry at Darling Harbour is km Walking distance to buses, trains, ferries and light rail services 800 m to Redfern Station and. km to Green Square. Bus services to south, west, east and north within walking distance St Peters train station is. km and Sydenham Station is 800 m SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 53 of 4

54 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS 6.0 Carbon and Energy Management Plan 6. Overview and objectives JHCPBG is committed to reducing energy use and carbon emissions during of the TSE Works. The Sydney Metro Sustainability Strategy objectives regarding carbon and energy that relate to the TSE Works scope are: Reduce energy use and carbon emissions during Support innovation and cost-effective approaches to energy efficiency, lowcarbon/renewable energy sources, and energy procurement. The following section of this Plan outlines the TSE Works Carbon and Energy Management Plan, outlining management strategies and initiatives and addressing modelling and reporting requirements. JHCPBG has adopted the energy management hierarchy detailed in the Sydney Metro Sustainability Strategy (refer to Figure 8 of the SMCSW Sustainability Strategy), which targets elimination, efficiency, low carbon sources and finally offsetting. This approach has been introduced early in the design development process and will be revisited at each of the key delivery phases to ensure any new opportunities to improve energy performance are investigated. 6. Greenhouse gas reporting standards Carbon and energy monitoring and reporting for the TSE Works will be undertaken in accordance with the following standards: Australian National Greenhouse Accounts Factors (Department of Environment and Energy, 07) Greenhouse Gas Protocol A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (World Business Council for Sustainable Development 0) ISO, 006. ISO Greenhouse gases Part : Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. 6.3 Scope of modelling and monitoring program This Plan has been developed in response to TfNSW s Sydney Metro City & Southwest Sustainability Strategy and is applicable to the TSE Works component of the Project. As set out in the Construction Environment Management Plan, the scope of the TSE Works is limited to the design and of tunnels and underground station excavation, station structures at Barangaroo, cross passages and associated civil works from Chatswood to Sydenham. The TSE Works is the only component of the Sydney Metro City & Southwest Project that JHCPBG is required to assess with regards to carbon and energy footprint. Completed sections of the TSE Works, including established worksites, will be progressively handed over to TfNSW to enable follow-on contractors to commence rail systems fit out. No operational aspects are required to be assessed as part of TSE Works carbon and energy modelling as the TSE Works scope has no operational footprint. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 54 of 4

55 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS Carbon and energy modelling and reporting will be undertaken using TfNSW s Carbon Estimate and Reporting Tool (CERT) in accordance with the CERT Guidelines. These guidelines require that reporting using CERT is carried out against set milestones as follows: System Design Review (SDR) stage or equivalent design stage (~0% design) Critical Design Review (CDR) stage or equivalent design stage (00% design) Six-monthly during the six-monthly periods run from January to 30 June and from July to 3 December. The non-linear nature of the TSE Works design and delivery process results in design occurring in parallel with (see Figure for an indicative timeline of the TSE Works). This creates a level of complexity with regards to undertaking carbon and energy modelling and reporting at these specified gates. The CERT reporting carried out by JHCPBG at tender based on the TSE reference design aligns with the SDR stage (~0% design). The CDR stage of CERT will be completed upon completion of final design in late Carbon and energy targets The TSE Works SWTC sets out sustainability targets, which are detailed in Part B Element Sustainability targets. These include targets relating to carbon and energy management aspects of the TSE Works, namely Target 3 through to Target 7. The targets include maximum quantities of fuel and electricity use, and greenhouse gas emissions reduction, which were calculated based on early concept design. Given the current unresolved scope of the TSE Works, these targets will likely need to be revised once the scope is confirmed. JHCPBG has prepared an estimate of Scope, Scope and Scope 3 carbon emissions associated with delivery of the TSE Works. This estimate was calculated using TfNSW s Carbon Estimate and Reporting Tool (CERT) based on concept design (i.e. aligning with the Critical Design Review (CDR) phase in the CERT tool). As part of this process, JHCPBG has also estimated carbon emissions associated with a base case scenario, or baseline, against the TSE Works scope. The results of these emissions calculations are illustrated in Figure 9. This carbon footprint estimation incorporates direct and indirect emissions associated with electricity and fuel consumption, on-site process emissions, and embodied emissions for all concrete and steel used in of the TSE Works. By aligning the estimation of emissions with inputs, the reporting and review process will be combined in a single reporting process that also meets the requirements of the NGER Act 007. The carbon emission baseline value for the TSE Works was determined using Reference Design information provided by TfNSW, in conjunction with a number assumptions made surrounding business as usual inputs, such as types of materials used, likely distance for materials to travel to worksites, and methodologies. These assumptions relied upon the use of early design options, recognised industry benchmarks, or previous project experience. Once a carbon emission baseline was established, estimates were made for the carbon emissions associated with the JHCPBG Tender Design for the TSE Works, to be used as carbon emission reduction targets. These estimates used the Reference Design as a theoretical basis, against which energy efficiency optimisation could be measured. Figure 9 presents the results of the carbon emission reduction target development. The pie chart illustrates the breakdown of forecast carbon emissions into Scope, and 3, based on SDR. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 55 of 4

56 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS As part of the Final Design processes, a further breakdown of demand and supply will provide a better idea of performance and assist in the monitoring and review process that will continue throughout the life of the TSE Works. As such, the estimate of carbon emissions associated with the TSE Works will need to be revised following completion of Final Design for all TSE Works packages. This revision will need to take into consideration additions to the TSE scope of works, some of which are only commencing design and others are still being clarified. 33,400 Emissions tcoe 6,876 Figure 9: Breakdown and total carbon emission reduction for Critical Design Review (CDR) 6.5 Carbon and energy management strategies and initiatives The carbon and energy management strategies and initiatives that will be implemented as part of the TSE Works include: Reduce or eliminate energy use through removal of unnecessary work activities. Use prefabricated assets where possible e.g. reuse of batching facility to reduce transport greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with multiple trips to site to supply products and materials. Large mass haul items such as tunnel segments will be produced on site, significantly reducing carbon emissions associated with transportation Use energy efficient equipment. The methodology uses a range of energy efficient systems, including variable speed drive, power factor correction, efficient fans, pumps, conveyors, compressors, cooling systems and energy efficient lighting in site compound and tunnelling areas. These have been shown to deliver a whole-of-life benefit through reduced energy use Use energy efficient site accommodation where practicable. Site accommodation will be fitted out with T8 or LED lighting, and energy efficient fixtures such as packaged split systems where practicable Use of alternative fuels. B5 Biofuel will be used for on-site refuelling of plant where warranties do not preclude. Plant procurement will prioritise the use of plant which does not preclude B5 from use SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 56 of 4

57 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS Use new and regularly serviced equipment and plant on site to reduce the GHG emissions associated with their operation. The Environment and Sustainability Subcontractor Pack will indicate a preference for new plant and equipment ( 4 years old) on site. The widespread application of B5 fuel will also require a rigorous maintenance schedule to ensure carbon efficiencies are not lost through overall plant inefficiency Implement an idling reduction policy for plant and equipment. The policy will be specified in the Air Quality Management Plan to ensure plant and equipment is turned off when not in use for extended periods of time Purchase Green power for 5% of total electricity needs of the TSE Works to reduce the carbon associated with off-site energy generation Implement a targeted carbon and energy education program: - Toolbox talks promoting sustainable thinking and providing information on sustainability targets, initiatives, shared responsibility and ongoing performance updates - Use Green Transport surveys to collect information on how people travel to and from work while educating participants on how they may reduce their carbon footprint. Survey findings (Section 5.8). - Use electrical plant and equipment where practicable. Heavy equipment that can be operated electronically instead of through diesel power, has been identified and preferred as part of the planning process. This has resulted in a lower reliance on diesel-powered heavy plant. This includes critical items such as the tunnel boring machines (TBMs), road headers, shotcrete rigs and plant used to install mesh as part of the tunnel lining process. While diesel power is needed to relocate these plant items, they operate electronically when in place Implement low carbon transport strategies to minimise fuel use by optimising the transport of people and materials through: - Reducing transport needs by first reducing materials required - Promoting a Green Travel Plan for employees (see above) - Reducing materials haulage and adopting low carbon transport methods for materials such as use of barges to transport TBMs across Sydney Harbour in place of road transport. It should also be noted that the scope of works excludes any electrical infrastructure to be installed as part of the delivered asset. As such no energy efficiency or elimination initiatives could have been included as part of the TSE works as they have been procured outside of JHCPBG scope. JHCPBG will continue to seek and identify strategies and initiatives that minimise the greenhouse gas footprint of the TSE Works throughout detailed design development and. Initiatives will be captured in the TSE Works Value Engineering and Sustainability Opportunity Register (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-REG-06067) and considered as part of carbon and energy reporting processes (see Section 6.6 and Element 3 Monitoring, modelling and reporting). SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 57 of 4

58 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS 6.6 Monitoring and reporting Refer to Section 4.3 of this Plan details JHCPBG s sustainability monitoring and reporting system. Key reporting requirements are described in Section 4.3.4, including monthly reporting to TfNSW and CERT reporting requirements (Section 6.3). Fuel, electricity and materials usage data captured as part of this process will be used to calculate actual carbon emissions associated with delivery of the TSE Works. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 58 of 4

59 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS 7.0 Materials Management Plan 7. Overview and Objectives The TSE Works will place a significant demand on a range of resources, including both primary and secondary materials that have undergone some degree offsite processing. This demand has the potential to create a resource depletion risk. To manage this risk, JHCPBG will adopt the following materials and waste management hierarchy during the TSE Works: Avoid, Reduce, Re-use, Recycle. Additional consideration will be applied for product and material stewardship, which considers both social and environmental impacts of those primary resources that must be used e.g. sustainably sourced timber that supports good forestry practices. The Sydney Metro Sustainability Strategy objectives regarding materials management that relate to the TSE Works scope are: Minimise waste through the Project lifecycle Reduce materials consumption Consider embodied impacts in materials selection Use recycled materials and recycle and reuse materials onsite, where possible Maximise beneficial reuse of spoil The following outlines JHCPBG s approach to sustainably manage materials used during delivery of the TSE Works. 7. Materials footprint The ISCA Materials Calculator has been used to estimate the materials footprint for the TSE Works as part of early design development. The results of this assessment are presented in Table and Figure 0. Table : Preliminary TSE Works materials footprint Scenario GHG (tco-e) IS EnviroPoints Base case 87,900 54,03 Actual case 57,6 43,680 Reductions 30,784 8,4 This reduction is illustrated in Figure, demonstrating that JHCPBG will achieve significant improvements in resource efficiency as shown in the materials (Scope 3 emissions). SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 59 of 4

60 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS Figure 0: Materials calculator output for TSE Works preliminary materials footprint analysis Figure : Preliminary estimate of materials footprint reduction SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 60 of 4

61 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS 7.3 Mitigation of impacts associated with materials use In order to achieve a materials footprint reduction, JHCPBG will implement the following initiatives. These initiatives aim to minimise quantities of materials required, minimise environmental impact of materials used, and/or maximise use of recycled materials, and include: Reuse of major steelwork components from the TSE Works including cross passage ramps, lintels, sills and jambs Reuse of the steelwork components within the TSE Works, e.g. under harbour cross passages will reuse steelwork from Chatswood Use of recycled or reused steel where possible. Sourcing reinforcing steel (rebar and mesh) from suppliers who use electric arc furnaces which adopt energy-reducing processes such as Polymer Injection Technology (PIT), to reduce the embodied energy per unit. Suppliers will need to be members of the World Steel Association (WSA) Climate Assessment Program (CAP) Reduce the volume of steel and concrete, including using high grades of steel reenforcement enabling the reduction in total steel volume JHCPBG s proposal for smaller cross passages would reduce concrete and steel use has been taken up as part of the value engineering process and is captured in the Value Engineering and Sustainability Opportunity Register (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-REG ). Provide for asset reuse. This approach removes and/or minimises the need to procure various items of equipment through reuse of existing plant and facilities from the TSE Works. This includes reusing equipment from the North West Rail TSE Package (Kellyville precast facility) and an investigation of the use of TBMs from that project. The use of only one TBM for the harbour crossing saves about 500t of fabricated steel Use standardised modular methods. Segment design for constructed tunnels will use standardised segments broken into a number of types to provide for geological and technical requirements along the alignment. This will not only generate efficiencies in the batching plant fabrication but lead directly to efficiency gains in the batching process itself. We will also investigate reusing segment moulds from the TSE Works Implement the Forest Certification Scheme (FSC) procurement policy. Sourcing timber from FSC sources certified suppliers or, where it can be shown it is impractical to source timber using the FSC scheme, timber will be sourced from Forestry Corporation NSW managed schemes which can provide Chain of Custody using PEFC certification Reuse of formwork. If materials used on site can be reused without diminished performance or easily repurposed without the need for off-site treatment or processing, they will be used as a preference in of TSE works e.g. formwork and dunnage from the TSE Works Cement replacement There is a full range of cement mixes proposed for use on the TSE Works, all of which will require trial mixing and performance testing before their use. They include: - 3MPa concrete will be used for all temporary concrete SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 6 of 4

62 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS - 40MPa concrete is an SWTC-nominated minimum strength for all permanent concrete - 50MPa concrete will be used for all precast tunnel lining segments The initial aim will be to reduce the overall quantity of cementitious material and then replace a maximum percentage of the Portland Cement with either fly ash or slag in line with the SWTC requirements. Laboratory and Field trials of concrete mixes will determine the final level of fly ash or slag in the mix. 7.4 Waste minimisation and reuse Waste minimisation, reuse and recycling practices will be implemented in accordance with the waste hierarchy, further details of which can be found in the Construction Waste and Recycling Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-000). The strategy adopted will: Ensure the highest percentage of demolition and waste is reused or recycled, we will engage with contractors that align with our commitment to waste management and diversion. Waste management targets will be specified in relevant subcontracts. Where practicable post-consumer, post-industrial recycled material or waste materials, including crushed glass, recycled aggregate, tyre-derived aggregate and recycled materials for noise attenuation devices will be used. Recycled hardstand materials will be used for temporary works, if possible, and existing hardstand areas will be maintained for use and improved where necessary. Spoil reuse opportunities will be sought and maximised, targeting 00% reuse of reusable spoil generated during delivery of the TSE Works. This may involve seeking Resource Recovery Exemptions and is addressed in the Spoil Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0009). SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 6 of 4

63 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS Part B Systems and tools Part B of this Plan explains how sustainability requirements and targets will be met during the TSE Works. Compliance with all elements of these systems and tools is required at all times to minimise the likelihood of causing unauthorised environmental harm and maximise the uptake of opportunities to reduce environmental impact. Part B contains the following: Environmental Elements and Expectations: These describe what is required of the TSE Works in order to implement the objectives of JHCPBG s Environment and Sustainability Policy Statement: - Element Key aspects for managing this function in delivering the TSE Works - Intent A one-line statement describing the overall purpose of the Element - Expectation The outcomes achieved as part of each Element. Requirements: These are the specific actions performed in order to demonstrate compliance with the Elements and Expectations. Responsibility and Key Contributor: This information is included to ensure absolute clarity as to those people responsible for achieving compliance with the stated Expectation, as well as those that will need to assist/contribute to achieving compliance. Deliverables: This column of the table lists the tangible outcomes to be produced in order to demonstrate compliance with the environmental Elements and Expectations SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 63 of 4

64 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS Element Sustainability targets All staff, employees and subcontractors will actively strive to achieve the sustainability targets for the TSE Works How is the target calculated?* How will JHCPBG meet the expectation? Responsible Key contributor Deliverables. Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia IS Technical Manual and IS Rating Tool Version., 03 Design score of at least 65. Assessment of the TSE Works against of ISCA s IS Rating Tool version. and application of the ISCA Scorecard Also see Targets 7,, and 9 which establish levels to be achieved for specific IS Credits. JHCPBG will meet this expectation through: Previous knowledge and expertise in obtaining leading IS ratings for Design and As-Built Knowledge sharing through experiences on other projects Gap analysis to identify where knowledge and application of ISCA can be improved Ensuring ISCA requirements are imbedded in decision-making through the design process Project Director Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Completed IS Scorecard Completed IS Credit Summary forms Evidence files Preparation of meaningful and concise evidence to address relevant ISCA credits Ongoing evaluation to ensure that ISCA requirements are being fulfilled.. Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia IS Technical Manual and IS Rating Tool Version., 03 As built score of at least 65. Assessment of the TSE Works against of ISCA s IS Rating Tool version. and application of the ISCA Scorecard Refer to Targets. Refer to Target and Section 4.5. Refer to Target Refer to Target SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 64 of 4

65 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS How is the target calculated?* How will JHCPBG meet the expectation? Responsible Key contributor Deliverables 3. A maximum of 80,000,000 kwh of electricity will be used in the TSE Contractor s Activities. Through quantifying reductions associated with elimination, efficiencies and substitution initiatives that have been identified. JHCPBG will meet this expectation through: Elimination: - Construction methodologies that reduce or remove work scope, thus reducing resource use - JHCPBG will achieve a reduction in Scope 3 emissions through avoided transmission loss associated with energy reductions achieved on site Construction s Data captured in SharePoint and presented in monthly client reports (see Section 4.3) Completed IS Credit Summary forms Efficiency: - Variable speed drives, power factor correction and purchase of efficient equipment - Efficient site accommodation i.e. LED lighting, replace equipment with more efficient models at end of life, insulation, shading systems, air conditioning units Substitution use of on-site renewable energy systems photovoltaic where practicable (Section 6.5) 4. A maximum of 4,38 kl of fuel will be used in the TSE Contractor s Activities. JHCPBG has identified that the TfNSW Reference Design estimate does not include all fuel types required to construct the project. This means a reduction against the The calculated reduction in fuel use will be achieved by: Elimination: - Construction methodologies that reduce or remove work scope, thus reducing resource use Design Team Construction s Plant Data captured in SharePoint and presented in monthly client reports (see Section 4.3) SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 65 of 4

66 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS How is the target calculated?* How will JHCPBG meet the expectation? Responsible Key contributor Deliverables TfNSW Reference Design estimate is therefore not achievable. To address this issue, we have calculated a base case estimate and identified a number of initiatives to achieve a reduction in line with the ISCA Ene, Level requirements, which can only be achieved with significant fuel reduction. - Reduced fuel burn associated with the movement and haulage of materials Efficiency: - Use of hybrid excavators, where reasonable and feasible - Identification, training and implementation of efficient practices - Fuel efficient procurement and maintenance policy for plant Substitution: - Use of biofuel, where practicable - Use of electric vehicles in place of combustion engines, where practicable - Transferring generator loads onto mains electricity to benefit improved carbon intensity (Section 6.5). Completed IS Credit Summary forms 5. At least a 0% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from the project baseline greenhouse gas footprint, to be determined using the Transport for NSW s Carbon Estimate and Reporting Tool (CERT). Based on early design detail JHCPBG has input data into the CERT tool against those fields populated by the TfNSW Reference Design and achieved greater than 0% reduction. JHCPBG will meet this expectation through a mix of Scope and initiatives (it is noted that the CERT tool does not offer a full representation of Scope 3 emissions) which are detailed in Targets 3 and 4 above and in Section 6.5. Design Team Construction s Submission of TfNSW Carbon Estimation and Reporting Tool (CERT) SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 66 of 4

67 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS How is the target calculated?* How will JHCPBG meet the expectation? Responsible Key contributor Deliverables 6. At least 5% of the electricity needs of the TSE Contractor s Activities are offset by purchasing carbon credits or renewable energy. JHCPBG will purchase Green Power to meet the Sydney Metro Sustainability Strategy Energy Management Hierarchy JHCPBG will meet this expectation through the purchase of 5% accredited Green Power through the main electricity supplier to ensure the tariff is applied to the total demand (Section 6.5). Commercial Extract from the electricity supply contract 7. Achieve Infrastructure Sustainability rating scheme v. level for credit Ene- 'Energy and carbon monitoring and reduction target' demonstrating a greenhouse gas emissions reduction of 0% below a base case footprint. Greenhouse gas footprint analysis to assess actual emission generated during the TSE Works against the base case footprint using CERT Greenhouse gas emissions modelling will be carried out using TfNSW s Carbon Estimate and Reporting Tool (CERT) in line with the Carbon Estimate and Reporting Tool Guidelines. Data inputs and estimates required for modelling of greenhouse gas footprint will be provided by JHCPBG s design, and environmental teams. Relevant data is forecast as part of project management, planning and costing processes. Sustainability data will be monitored and captured during in line with the processes described in Section 4.3 and Part B Element 3 Monitoring, modelling and reporting. Refer also to Targets 3 and 4. Design Team Construction s Plant Project Environment Data captured in SharePoint and presented in monthly client reports (see Section 4.3) Greenhouse gas footprint analysis using CERT Completed IS Credit Summary forms 8. Implement at least two initiatives which will provide tangible benefits to local community groups within the period of completion of the TSE Contractor s Activities. Communities in the same local government area as JHCPBG will meet this expectation through implementation of initiatives such as: Project Director Community Communication SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 67 of 4

68 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS How is the target calculated?* How will JHCPBG meet the expectation? Responsible Key contributor Deliverables the TSE Contractor s Activities; prioritising those most impacted by the works where possible. Also see Target 9. Commissioning public art in the form of five professional (3m x m) murals, preferably by local artists, with a heritage theme in Marrickville and Waterloo Providing learning equipment for the Alexandria Park Community School Providing labour and materials to build herb gardens in two local day care centres. Refer to Section 5.4. Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Senior Stakeholder and Community Relations Strategy (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-SH-PLN ) Council and community consultation records Photography 9. Implement at least two initiatives which will provide tangible benefits to the broader local community beyond the period of completion of the TSE Contractor s Activities. Tangible community benefits must be real and quantifiable, and may include such initiatives as: Fundraising or donation of materials and labour to benefit local groups Education and knowledgesharing initiatives to benefit local groups. Also see Target 8. JHCPBG will meet this expectation through: Commissioning a permanent heritage interpretation panel for Blues Point reflecting the importance of the area to Sydney's early transport and any potential finds made during heritage investigations of the site Providing resource support packages for 0 disadvantaged local students to provide books and tools to undertake -related training or education Supporting fundraising by employees and Subcontractors for the benefit of Bear Cottage, a hospice for NSW children with life-limiting illnesses (Section 5.4). Project Director Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Senior Stakeholder and Community Relations Community Communication Strategy (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-SH-PLN ) Council and community consultation records Photographs of completed panel Fundraising records SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 68 of 4

69 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS How is the target calculated?* How will JHCPBG meet the expectation? Responsible Key contributor Deliverables 0. Reuse at least 80% of concrete production operation water into concrete production at onsite or offsite batching plants for all concrete used in the TSE Contractor s Activities. This will be quantified through analysis of reports provided by concrete suppliers and the precast facility batch plant. JHCPBG will meet this expectation through: Capturing, treating and reusing wastewater from the JHCPBG precast facility Prospective tenderers being required to provide details of how they intend to meet this target, as part of the tendering process for the supply of concrete manufactured off site (Section 5.). Commercial Construction s Project Environment Monthly client report. Achieve Infrastructure Sustainability rating scheme v. level for credit Wat- 'Water use monitoring and reduction', demonstrating a reduction in water use of 0% compared to a base case footprint. Through quantifying the adjacent elimination and efficiency initiatives, Wat- level will be achieved. No operational water uses have been incorporated as the TSE Works does not include any operational use of water. JHCPBG will meet this expectation through: Elimination methodologies that reduce or remove work scope, thus reducing resource use Efficiency: - Installation of smart meters on key processes to help identify leakage, excessive use and areas where potential reductions can be made - Segment production curing process will be designed to minimise potable water use (Section 5.). Plant Construction s This Plan Completed IS Credit Summary forms Evidence files Monitoring reports SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 69 of 4

70 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS How is the target calculated?* How will JHCPBG meet the expectation? Responsible Key contributor Deliverables. Achieve Infrastructure Sustainability rating scheme v. level for credit Wat- 'Replace potable water', demonstrating that at least 33% of water used is from non-potable sources. Through quantifying the adjacent initiatives, Wat- level will be achieved where this does not also result in any significant negative environmental, social or economic impacts. JHCPBG will meet this expectation through: Reuse of water captured from the conveyor wash-box system TBM cooling water will be reused through the system and replenished with potable water only as required On-site capture of rainwater for use i.e. wash-down, flushing toilets, dust suppression Construction s This Plan Completed IS Credit Summary forms Evidence files Monitoring reports On-site capture of treated water for dust suppression Use recycled water in premix concrete types (Section 5.). 3. A maximum of,07,000 kilolitres of water from the potable water main will be used in the TSE Contractor s Activities. Through quantifying the initiatives detailed in Targets and. Refer to Targets and and Section 5.. Construction s This Plan Monitoring reports 4. A maximum of 385,000 of kilolitres of water from sources other than the potable water main will be used in the TSE Contractor s Activities. Refer to Target 3. JHCPBG will meet this expectation through the initiatives detailed in Target and Section 5.. Construction s This Plan Monitoring reports SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 70 of 4

71 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS How is the target calculated?* How will JHCPBG meet the expectation? Responsible Key contributor Deliverables percentage of water used in the TSE Contractor s Activities will be sourced from non-potable sources. Refer to Target 3. JHCPBG will meet this expectation through the initiatives detailed in Target and Section 5.. Construction s This Plan Monitoring reports 6. Note Used. 7. Between 5 percent and 67 percent of Portland cement will be replaced by supplementary cementitious material for each concrete type used for the TSE Contractor s Activities (based on compressive strength MPa). Concrete use data will be captured during delivery of the TSE Works as part of the TSE Works sustainability data capture and reporting system (see Section 4.3). This data will be used to determine the percentage of Portland cement replacement. There is a full range of cement mixes proposed for use on the TSE Works, all of which will require trial mixing and performance testing before their use. They include: 3 MPa concrete will be used for all temporary concrete 40 MPa concrete is an SWTC-nominated minimum strength for all permanent concrete 50 MPa concrete will be used for all precast tunnel lining segments The initial aim will be to reduce the overall quantity of cementitious material and then replace a maximum percentage of the Portland Cement with either fly ash or slag in line with the SWTC requirements. Laboratory and Field trials of concrete mixes will determine the final level of fly ash or slag in the mix. Design Team Materials Management Plan (Section 7.0) Monitoring reports SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 7 of 4

72 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS How is the target calculated?* How will JHCPBG meet the expectation? Responsible Key contributor Deliverables 8. At least 60% of all reinforcing steel is produced using energy-reducing processes in its manufacture. Certified under the Australian Certification Authority for the Reinforcing and Structural Steels or equivalent JHCPBG will meet this expectation through: Sourcing of reinforcing steel (rebar and mesh) from suppliers using electric arc furnaces which adopt energy reducing processes such as Polymer Injection Technology (PIT), to reduce the embodied energy per unit Commercial Materials Management Plan (Section 7.0) Sourcing of reinforcing steel (rebar and mesh) from suppliers that are members of the World Steel Association (WSA) Climate Assessment Program (CAP) (Section 5.3). 9. Achieve Infrastructure Sustainability rating scheme v. level for credit Mat- 'Materials footprint measurement and reduction', demonstrating a 5% reduction in materials lifecycle impacts compared to a base case footprint. Through quantifying the adjacent initiatives, Mat- level will be achieved. JHCPBG will meet this expectation through: Elimination - Construction methodologies that reduce or remove work scope, thus reducing resource use Reuse - Where materials used on site can be reused without diminished performance or easily repurposed without the need for offsite treatment or processing. These materials will be used in preference to new materials in of TSE Works e.g. formwork and dunnage from TSC Works Design Team Carbon and Energy Management Plan (Section 6.0) Completed IS Credit Summary forms Evidence files Monitoring reports Substitution see Target 7 and Sections 5.3 and 7.0 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 7 of 4

73 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS How is the target calculated?* How will JHCPBG meet the expectation? Responsible Key contributor Deliverables 0. 00% of all timber products used in the Project Works and Temporary Works are from either re-used timber, post-consumer recycled timber, from Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) or Program for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) certified timber suppliers within Australia. Waste Classification Guidelines, Part : Classifying Waste (NSW EPA November 04). JHCPBG will meet this expectation through: Reuse of materials e.g. dunnage from TSC Works, thereby reducing the need to source new timber for some uses Sourcing timber from FSC-certified suppliers or, where it can be demonstrated it is impractical to source timber using the FSC scheme, timber will be sourced from the Forestry Corporation NSWmanaged schemes which can provide Chain of Custody from using PEFC certification (Section 5.3). Construction s Materials Management Plan (Section 7.0) Evidence files. At least 95% of inert and non-hazardous and demolition waste, excluding spoil, is recycled or alternatively beneficially reused. Waste Classification Guidelines, Part : Classifying Waste (NSW EPA November 04). JHCPBG will meet this expectation through: Previous knowledge associated with quantifying waste streams and quantities from similar projects Excellent working relationships with waste recovery service providers to maximise recycling and reduce waste to landfill Understanding that due to an increase in the number of infrastructure projects in NSW, waste recovery service providers are investing in technologies to increase the percentage of recoverable waste from exiting waste streams and also working towards making nonprofitable waste streams profitable Project Director Construction s Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Project Environment Construction Waste and Recycling Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN- 000) Monitoring reports SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 73 of 4

74 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS How is the target calculated?* How will JHCPBG meet the expectation? Responsible Key contributor Deliverables Requiring waste service providers during the tender process to identify how they will work with us to achieve the minimum recycling target (Section 5.6). At least 60% of office waste is recycled or alternatively beneficially reused. Waste Classification Guidelines, Part : Classifying Waste (NSW EPA November 04) JHCPBG will meet this expectation through: Onboarding process where employees will be inducted on requirements to maximise office recycling Clearly signed and strategically placed recycling bins with informative recycling posters in communal kitchen and rest areas Toolboxing cleaning staff on maximising office recycling and reporting back on problem areas, to ensure we can address any issues and provide targeted training An office waste audit will be used to determine the physical make-up of the office waste stream. This will identify waste that can be recycled through existing waste streams or requires targeted systems to maximise recycling (Section 5.3) Project Director Construction s Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Project Environment Construction Waste and Recycling Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN- 000) Monitoring reports 3. 00% of reusable spoil is beneficially reused in accordance with the spoil reuse hierarchy identified in the Environmental Documents and is not disposed to landfill. Does not include contaminated spoil (VENM and ENM only). Refer to the Spoil Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN- 0009). JHCBPG is also investigating the use of project-specific resource exceptions in collaboration with the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) to allow inert waste streams including slurry TBM spoil and water Project Director Construction s Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Spoil Management Plan (SMCSWTSE- JCG-TPW-EN-PLN- 0009) Monitoring reports SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 74 of 4

75 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS How is the target calculated?* How will JHCPBG meet the expectation? Responsible Key contributor Deliverables treatment plant filter cake to be reused rather than go to landfill and increase total beneficial reuse. Project Environment 4. Zero major pollution incidents. The Construction Environment Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-0000) includes this target. Incident classification will be set out in the Emergency Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-PM-PLN-0008). Building on the excellent environmental performance of the TSC Works, we will roll out a set of risk-based environmental procedures across the TSE Works. They will be tailored to address the specific requirements of the Infrastructure Approval and the Environmental Protection Licence (EPL). Refer to the Construction Environmental Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0000). Project Director Construction s Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Project Environment Monitoring reports *Given the current unresolved scope of the TSE Works, these targets will need to be revised once the full scope of the TSE Contractor s Activities is confirmed. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 75 of 4

76 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS Element Training All staff, employees and subcontractors will actively drive continuous improvement in the sustainability performance of the TSE Works Expectations How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Deliverables. All personnel have completed an induction containing relevant environmental information before they are authorised to work on the Project The sustainability component of the TSE induction and Game Plan training will include information on: What sustainability means on the TSE Works An overview of sustainability targets and strategies for the TSE Works An overview of the ISCA process An overview of innovation, and request for participants to identify ideas Workforce and Industry Participation Environment Coordinators Induction presentation. Targeted training is provided to relevant personnel Targeted sustainability training needs will be identified throughout the TSE Works. Training to be provided includes: ISCA IS Rating Tool training Supply Chain School (subcontractors) Workforce and Industry Participation Project budget Attendance records Course notes.3 Toolbox talks are used to reinforce key management requirements and lessons learnt Toolbox talks will be held regularly during site establishment and. They will reinforce and reiterate information from inductions, including sustainability initiatives, targets, and lessons learnt. Site Supervisor Environment Coordinators Toolbox records SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 76 of 4

77 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS Element 3 Monitoring, modelling and reporting All staff, employees and subcontractors will actively drive complaint sustainability performance of the TSE Works Expectations How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Deliverables 3. Worksites are regularly inspected to ensure the implementation of sustainability management requirements and initiative Implementation of sustainability initiatives will be inspected as part of regular environment and sustainability inspections and documented using the TSE Works Environment and Sustainability Inspection Field Form (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-FRM ) and the Detailed Sustainability Inspection Form (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-FRM-00477). This process is described in Section of this Plan. Project Environment Environment Coordinators Superintendents Site Supervisors Environment Inspection Reports Site Diary entries 3. Modelling and monitoring will be carried out to support development and tracking of TSE Works sustainability targets, and the TSE Works ISCA submissions JHCPBG will model and monitor energy, water, and materials usage, and associated carbon emissions, for the TSE Works. Modelling will be carried out considering the TSE Works Design, methodology, and forecasting data to estimate resource and materials usage requirements for completing these works. This data will also be used to develop a base case against which TSE performance can be compared. Modelling undertaken would require review where: New elements of the Project Works and Temporary Works are introduced, not covered by previous modelling Sustainability Advisor Sustainability Coordinator CERT updates Water balance ISCA Materials Calculator ISCA Design Rating submission ISCA As Built Rating submission Changes in sequencing or methodology are proposed. Monitoring against SWTC and ISCA As Built requirements will be carried out using the TSE Works SharePoint data capture and reporting system (Section 4.3). SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 77 of 4

78 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS Expectations How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Deliverables 3.3 Sustainability reporting Sustainability reporting requirements are detailed in Section 4.3, and include: Monthly sustainability reporting to TfNSW, including tracking performance against the TSE Works sustainability targets Quarterly NGERS reporting to John Holland Annual sustainability performance reporting, in line with ISCA credit Man-5 (see Section 4.3.4) Sustainability Coordinator Sustainability Advisor Monthly and annual reports CERT updates Air Emission Data Collection Workbook updates ISCA Design Rating submission ISCA As Built Rating submission CERT reporting (see also Section 6.3 and 6.6) TfNSW Air Emission Data Collection Workbook (9TP- FT-439) ISCA ratings submissions 3.4 Compliance monitoring Sustainability progress meetings to be held regularly with TfNSW. Approvals, Environment & Sustainability Meeting minutes Regular progress meetings will also be held with ISCA to discuss the progress of the TSE Works ISCA ratings submissions. TfNSW will be invited to attend these meetings. Sustainability Coordinator SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 78 of 4

79 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS Element 4 Auditing, review and improvement We will continually improve our sustainability systems and sustainability performance by monitoring and reviewing their effectiveness Expectations How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Deliverables 4. Audits are undertaken to ensure compliance with the requirements of this Plan Procedures for corrective actions are addressed in the Construction Environmental Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0000). Audits will be performed in accordance with the CEMP and updates would be made to this Plan and/or associated documents or procedures if required. Project Environment Environmental Coordinators Approvals, Environment & Sustainability Audit reports Corrective Action Reports 4. All nonconformances are reported and actioned Where a non-conformance is raised as part of an audit or an incident or complaint investigation the audit, incident or complaint report may be used to close out the nonconformance and it is not necessary to raise a separate nonconformance reporting process. Corrective and Preventative Actions may also be raised in accordance with the Construction Environmental Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN- 0000). Approvals, Environment & Sustainability Project Environment Environmental Coordinators Audit reports Corrective Action Reports 4.3 Management Plan review JHCPBG will review and update (as required) the throughout the duration of the TSE Works, and at least annually, taking into consideration: New elements of the Project Works and Temporary Works not covered by the existing Plan Approvals, Environment & Sustainability Manage Sustainability Advisor Revised Sustainability Management Plan Changes in sequencing or methodology SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 79 of 4

80 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS Expectations How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Deliverables 4.4 Senior management review of sustainability performance Sustainability performance will be reviewed formally by the TSE Senior Leadership Team (SLT) (see Section 4.4.). Any actions arising from the senior management review would be captured and close out using Project Pack Web. Approvals, Environment & Sustainability TSE Senior Leadership Team Annual sustainability performance report SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 80 of 4

81 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS Element 5 Project specific requirements Construction Environmental Management Framework No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing.3 Transport for NSW (TfNSW) has developed an Environment and Sustainability Policy (Appendix A) for the Sydney Metro Delivery Office (SMDO). Principal Contractors will be required to undertake their works in accordance with this policy. Sections.3 and.4 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and 3. (e) The Principal Contractor s Sustainability Plan and its sub plans will capture governance and design requirements as well as social sustainability initiatives by the Sydney Metro Sustainability Strategies. Sections 4., 5.4, and 5.8 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor 3. (a) Principal Contractors are required to prepare and implement a (SMP) relevant to the scale and nature of their scope of works. The SMP shall comprise of a main SMP document and issue-specific sub-plans. This Plan Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor 3. (b) Depending on the scope and scale of the works, TfNSW may decide to streamline the SMP and sub-plan requirements. As a minimum the SMP will address and detail: SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 8 of 4

82 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing (i) The requirements of the relevant planning approval documentation, any relevant conditions of all other permits and licences, the Contractor s corporate EMS, the sustainability provisions of the contract documentation, and this Construction Environmental Management Framework; Part B Systems and tools Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and (ii) The sustainability management team structure, including key personnel authority and roles of key personnel, lines of responsibility and communication, minimum skill levels of each role and interfaces with the overall project organisation structure; Section 3.0 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and (iii) A sustainability policy statement and strategies for adaptation to climate change, resource management (including energy, water and waste), workforce development, procurement and biodiversity enhancement; Section.4 and Appendix A Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and (iv) Sustainability initiatives to be implemented during the project; Section 4.0 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 8 of 4

83 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing (v) How sustainability initiatives will be identified and implemented; Section 4.0 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor (vi) The processes and methodologies for assurance, monitoring, auditing, corrective action, continuous improvement and reporting on sustainability performance; Sections 4.3 and 4.4, and Element 3 Monitoring, modelling and reporting and Element 4 Auditing, review and improvement Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and (vii) The processes and methodologies which will be used to achieve the required scores under rating systems identified in contract documents; Section 4.5 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor (viii) The processes and procedures for undertaking climate change risk assessments; Section 5. Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 83 of 4

84 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Sustainability Advisor Timing (ix) The processes and procedures for the identification and implementation of climate change adaption measures; Section 5. Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor (x) The approach to sustainable procurement including: The processes and procedures that will be used to provide environmental and social improvement; Section 5.6 Sustainability Coordinator Construction The processes and environmental and social criteria that will be used for the selection of Subcontractors; Contracts The processes that will be used to ensure ethical sourcing of labour and materials; Where equipment, materials or labour are procured from locations outside Australia, the processes that will be used to ensure human rights impacts and risks are identified and mitigated; and Interfaces with other Project Plans. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 84 of 4

85 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing 3. (c) Depending on the scope of the works, the SMP will also include, as a separate sub-plans: (i) A Construction Workforce Development Plan; Workforce Development Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-HR-PLN-0044) Workforce Development and Industry Participation Pre- (ii) A Construction Carbon and Energy Management Plan; Section 6.0 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- Sustainability Advisor (iii) A Materials Management Plan; and Section 7.0 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- (iv) A Waste Management & Recycling Plan. Construction Waste and Recycling Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-000) Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- Project Environment SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 85 of 4

86 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing 3. (a) The following carbon and energy management objectives will apply to : (i) Reduce energy use and carbon emissions during ; (ii) Support innovative and cost effective approaches to energy efficiency, low carbon / renewable energy sources and energy procurement; and Section 6. Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and (iii) Design to reduce energy use and carbon emissions during operations. 3. (a) Principal Contractors will develop and implement a Carbon and Energy Management Plan that will include, as a minimum: Section 6.0 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and (i) The carbon and energy mitigation measures as detailed in the environmental approval documentation; (ii) The relevant requirements of the Sydney Metro Environment and Sustainability Policy and the Sydney Metro Sustainability Strategy; Sustainability Advisor (iii) The responsibilities of key project personnel with respect to the implementation of the plan; (iv) The low carbon strategies and initiatives that will be implemented to minimise the carbon emissions associated with ; (v) The energy efficiency strategies and initiatives that will be implemented to minimise energy use associated with ; SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 86 of 4

87 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? (vi) Carbon emission estimates determined using a carbon footprint assessment undertaken in accordance with ISO 4064-, ISO4064- and ISO that incorporates direct and indirect emissions associated with ; and (vii) Compliance record generation and management. Responsible Key Contributor Timing 3.(b) Reporting of carbon and energy will be undertaken throughout the works in accordance with the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 007. Section 6.6 and Element 3 Monitoring, modelling and reporting Sustainability Coordinator Construction Contracts 3.(c) The Contractors would be required to retain appropriate records and prepare carbon footprint assessments (inclusive of Scope, and 3 emissions) at various stages of. Section 6.6, 5.6 and Element 3 Monitoring, modelling and reporting Sustainability Coordinator Construction Contracts 4.(a) The following materials management objectives would apply to the of the project: (i) Reduce material use throughout the project lifecycle; (ii) Consider embodied impacts in materials selection; (iii) Use recycled materials; Section 7.0 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and (iv) Recycle and reuse materials onsite; and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 87 of 4

88 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? (v) Influence subcontractors and materials suppliers to adopt sustainability objectives in their works and procurement. Responsible Key Contributor Timing 4.(a) Principal Contractors will be required to develop and implement a Sustainable Procurement Policy that will include as a minimum: (i) The materials mitigation measures as detailed in the environmental approval documentation; (ii) The relevant requirements of the City & Southwest Environment and Sustainability Policy and the City & Southwest Sustainability Strategy; Section 5.6 and Appendix A Subcontractor Requirements Pack (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-CR-RPT-09500) Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- (iii) The responsibilities of key project personnel with respect to the implementation of the policy; (iv) Compliance record generation and management; (v) Ethical sourcing of materials; and (vi) Local sourcing. 4.(b) The Contractors will be required to retain records detailing the consideration of sustainability in the procurement of all materials. Section 5.6 and Element 3 Monitoring, modelling and reporting Sustainability Coordinator Construction Contracts SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 88 of 4

89 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS Project Planning Approval No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing E7 The proponent must seek to achieve a best practice level of performance for the CSSI using market leading sustainability ratings tools (including a minimum Design and As-Built rating score of 65 using the Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia infrastructure rating tool, or an equivalent level of performance using a demonstrated equivalent rating tool). Section 4.5 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Design and E7 The Proponent must prepare a Sustainability Strategy to be submitted to the Secretary within six (6) months of the date of this approval, or within another timeframe agreed with the Secretary, which must be implemented throughout design, and operation of the CSSI. The Sustainability Strategy must include: (a) details of the sustainability objectives and targets for the design, delivery and operation of the CSSI; (b) details of the sustainability initiatives which will be investigated and / or implemented; and (c) a description of how the strategy will be implemented for the CSSI. The requirement to develop a Sustainability Strategy is held by TfNSW. JHCPBG has developed the TSE Sustainability Management Plan in line with this Strategy (see Sections. and.4). Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Design and E73 Opportunities to reduce operational greenhouse gas emissions must be investigated during detailed design. The sustainability initiatives identified must be implemented, reviewed and updated regularly Requirement held by TfNSW outside the scope of the TSE Works N/A N/A SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 89 of 4

90 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? throughout design development and, and annually during operation. Responsible Key Contributor Timing E74 The Proponent must fully offset the greenhouse gas emissions associated with consumption of electricity during operation of the CSSI. Requirement held by TfNSW outside the scope of the TSE Works N/A N/A E06 Waste generated during and operation is to be dealt with in accordance with the following priorities: (a) waste generation is to be avoided and where avoidance is not reasonably practicable, waste generation is to be reduced; (b) where avoiding or reducing waste is not possible, waste is to be re-used, recycled, or recovered; and (c) where re-using, recycling or recovering waste is not possible, waste is to be treated or disposed of. Construction Waste and Recycling Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-000 Construction Waste and Recycling Management Plan) Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Project Environment During SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 90 of 4

91 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS Revised Environmental Management Measures No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing T Construction sites would be managed to minimise staff parking on surrounding streets. The following measures would be implemented: Encouraging staff to use public or active transport Encouraging ride sharing Provision of alternative parking locations and shuttle bus transfers where feasible and reasonable. Section 5.8 Construction Traffic Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EN-PLN-0003) Traffic Construction s Interface Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Construction Transport for NSW would work with local councils to minimise adverse impacts of on parking and other kerbside use in local streets, such as loading zones, bus zones, taxi zones and coach zones. WM 00 per cent of spoil that can be reused would be beneficially reused in accordance with the project spoil reuse hierarchy. Spoil Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EN-PLN-0009) Spoil Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and WM3 A recycling target of at least 90 per cent would be adopted for the project. Construction Waste Management and Recycling Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-000) Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Project Environment Pre- and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 9 of 4

92 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing WM4 Construction waste would be minimised be accurately calculating materials brought to the site and limiting materials packaging. Construction Waste Management and Recycling Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-000) Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Project Environment Pre- and SUS Sustainability initiatives would be incorporated into the detailed design and of the project to support the achievement of the project sustainability objectives. Section 4.. and 4..3 Design Team Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Design SUS A best practice level of performance would be achieved using market leading sustainability rating tools during design and. Section 4.5 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Design and Sustainability Advisor SUS3 A workforce development and industry participation strategy would be developed and implemented during. Workforce Development and Industry Participation Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-HR-PLN-0044) Workforce Development and Industry Participation Pre- and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 9 of 4

93 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing SUS4 Climate change risk treatments would be incorporated into the detailed design of the project including: Ensuring that adequate flood modelling is carried out and integrated with design Section 5. Stormwater and Flooding Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-DN-PLN-00003) Design Team Arcadis BG&E JV Design Flooding and Hydrology Report (SMCSWTSE- JAB-TPW-DR-RPT ) Marrickville Earthworks and Drainage Flood Modelling (SMCSWTSE- JAB-DSY-DR-RPT ) Testing the sensitivity of air-conditioning systems to increased temperatures, and identify potential additional capacity of air-conditioning systems that may be required within the life of the project, with a view to safeguarding space if required N/A outside scope of TSE Works N/A N/A Testing the sensitivity of ventilation systems to increased temperatures and provide adequate capacity. N/A- outside scope of TSE Works N/A N/A SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 93 of 4

94 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing SUS5 An iterative process of greenhouse gas assessments and design refinements would be carried out during detailed design and to identify opportunities to minimise greenhouse gas emissions. Performance would be measured in terms of a percentage reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from a defined reference footprint. Section 6.5 and Element 3 Monitoring, modelling and reporting Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Design Team Construction s Design and Sustainability Advisor SUS6 5 per cent of the greenhouse gas emissions associated with consumption of electricity during would be offset. Section 6.5 and Element Sustainability targets Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Design and Sustainability Advisor Scope of Work and Technical Criteria No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing 6.9 (a) All temporary site facilities, including site sheds and the temporary site facilities provided for the Principal and the Independent Certifier, must be as-new and must be maintained in excellent condition. Site facilities, including site sheds, must be established Section 5.7 Construction s Design and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 94 of 4

95 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? at locations and positions that minimise the impact on adjoining properties and residents. All facilities utilised for the purpose of the TSE Contractor's Activities must be sited, constructed and maintained in good condition to meet the requirements of relevant Authorities. (b) Subject to section 6.9(c) below, the TSE Contractor must ensure all site facilities incorporate: (i) energy efficient design features, and best practice energy efficient lighting solutions, light fittings and electrical appliances; (ii) high performance thermal insulation in all walls, ceilings and floors that optimise thermal performance; (iii) natural daylighting; (iv) natural ventilation; (v) water efficient fixtures, fittings and controls; (vi) air conditioning refrigerants with low or zero global warming potential; (vii) bicycle storage facilities, showers and changing room facilities; and (viii) Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles. (c) Where the TSE Contractor is using existing building and structures for Temporary Site Facilities then the Responsible Key Contributor Sustainability Advisor Timing SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 95 of 4

96 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? requirements of sections 6.9(b)(i) to 6.9(b)(viii) may be excluded at the relevant site. (d) The TSE Contractor must ensure that all new waterusing appliances, shower heads, taps and toilets have at least the average Water Efficiency Labelling Scheme (WELS) star rating by product type. (e) The TSE Contractor must ensure that all new electrical equipment has at least the market average star rating. In categories where no star ratings are available, electrical equipment must be recognised as high efficiency either by being ENERGY STAR accredited, in a high efficiency band under Australian Standards or being above-average efficiency of Greenhouse and Energy Minimum Standards (GEMS) registered products. Responsible Key Contributor Timing SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 96 of 4

97 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS Scope of Work and Technical Criteria Appendix E.5 No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing (b) The TSE Contractor must report on mobile non-road diesel plant and equipment engine conformity with relevant United States Environmental Protection, European Union or equivalent emission standards and the fitting of any exhaust after-treatment devices. Reporting must be completed and provided to the Principal s Representative within month of the date of the deed and subsequently annually using TfNSW s Air Emission Data Collection Workbook (9TP-FT-439). Section and Part B Element 3 Monitoring, modelling and reporting Plant Sustainability Advisor Design and Scope of Work and Technical Criteria Appendix E.6 No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing 6 (c) Further to the requirements of clause 9.4 of the deed, the TSE Contractor must undertake the ongoing development, amendment and updating of the Sustainability Plan throughout the duration of the TSE Contractor's Activities including to take into account: Section 4.4 Sustainability Advisor Pre- and (i) (ii) new elements of the Project Works and Temporary Works not covered by the existing Sustainability Plan; and changes in sequencing or methodology. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 97 of 4

98 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS Scope of Work and Technical Criteria Appendix A.7 No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing (a) The TSE Contractor must ensure that sustainability is addressed throughout the performance of the TSE Contractor s Activities and that sustainability is embedded into the design and of the Project Works and the Temporary Works. This Plan Section 4.0 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Design Team Construction s Design and Sustainability Advisor (b) The TSE Contractor must comply with, carry out and fulfil the requirements of and the commitments in the Sydney Metro City & Southwest Sustainability Strategy, including the requirements and commitments relating to targets and initiatives, but only to the extent that they relate to the scope and extent of the Project Works, the Temporary Works and the TSE Contractor s Activities. Section. Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and (c) The TSE Contractor must enter into a ratings agreement with the Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia to obtain an Infrastructure Sustainability rating for the TSE Contractor s Activities, in consultation with the Principal s Representative. Section 4.5 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 98 of 4

99 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing (d) The Principal will register the TSE Contractor s Activities with the Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia to obtain an Infrastructure Sustainability rating and pay the registration fee. Section 4.5 (Fee paid by TfNSW) Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- (e) The TSE Contractor must achieve a certified design rating score of at least 65 points, using the Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia Infrastructure Sustainability rating tool version. Design and As Built for the design of the Project Works and Temporary Works. Section 4.5 and Element Sustainability targets Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Design and (f) In achieving the design rating, the TSE Contractor must, as a minimum, achieve the following levels using the Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia Infrastructure Sustainability rating scheme version.: (i) Level for credit Ene- 'Energy and carbon monitoring and reduction target' demonstrating a greenhouse gas emissions reduction of 0% below a base case footprint; (ii) Level for credit Ene- Use of renewable energy' to fully investigate opportunities for use of renewable energy; (iii) Level for credit Wat- 'Water use monitoring and reduction', demonstrating a reduction in water use of 0% compared to a base case footprint; (iv) Level for credit Wat- 'Replace potable water', demonstrating that at least 33% of water used is from non-potable sources; Section 4.5 and Element Sustainability targets Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Design and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 99 of 4

100 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? (v) Level for credit Mat- 'Materials footprint measurement and reduction', demonstrating a 5% reduction in materials lifecycle impacts compared to a base case footprint; (vi) Level for credit Pro- Commitment to sustainable procurement ; and (vii) Level 3 for credit Pro- Identification of suppliers. Responsible Key Contributor Timing (g) The TSE Contractor must achieve a certified as built rating score of at least 65 points, using the Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia Infrastructure Sustainability rating tool version. Design and As Built for the of the Project Works and Temporary Works. Section 4.5 and Element Sustainability targets Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Design and (h) In achieving the as built rating, the TSE Contractor must, as a minimum, achieve the following levels using the Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia Infrastructure Sustainability rating scheme version.: (viii) Level for credit Ene- 'Energy and carbon monitoring and reduction target' demonstrating a greenhouse gas emissions reduction of 0% below a base case footprint; (ix) Level for credit Ene- Use of renewable energy' to fully investigate opportunities for use of renewable energy; (x) Level for credit Wat- 'Water use monitoring and reduction', demonstrating a reduction in water use of 0% compared to a base case footprint; Section 4.5 and Element Sustainability targets Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Design and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 00 of 4

101 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? (iv) Level for credit Wat- 'Replace potable water', demonstrating that at least 33% of water used is from non-potable sources; (v) Level for credit Mat- 'Materials footprint measurement and reduction', demonstrating a 5% reduction in materials lifecycle impacts compared to a base case footprint; (vi) Level for credit Pro- Commitment to sustainable procurement ; (vii) Level 3 for credit Pro- Identification of suppliers ; (viii) Level 3 for credit Pro-3 Supplier evaluation and contract award ; and (ix) Level for credit Pro-4 Managing supplier performance. Responsible Key Contributor Timing (l) The Infrastructure Sustainability rating scores must be independently verified in accordance with the Infrastructure Sustainability rating process described in the Infrastructure Sustainability rating scheme which is administered by the Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia. Section 4.5 and Element Sustainability targets Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and (j) The TSE Contractor must participate in the development of a ratings implementation plan which will describe how the Infrastructure Sustainability ratings will be achieved. Section 4.5 and Element Sustainability targets Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 0 of 4

102 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing (k) The sustainability requirements in this Appendix A.7 will not apply to the Demolition Works and the sustainability requirements in the novated Demolition Contracts will remain applicable. Section. N/A N/A 3 (a) The TSE Contractor must identify and implement governance initiatives. Section 4.5. Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor 3 (b) The TSE Contractor must develop, implement and maintain governance structures, processes and systems that ensure integration and implementation of all sustainability considerations, initiatives and reporting. Section 4.5. Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor 3 (c) Sustainability objectives and requirements for the Sydney Metro City & Southwest project must be allowed for and addressed in: (i) design briefings for all personnel involved in the preparation of Design Documentation; (ii) processes for the development of Design Documentation; and Section 4.5. Design Team Construction s Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 0 of 4

103 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? (iii) site inductions for all of the TSE Contractor's personnel and Subcontractor personnel engaged in the TSE Contractor s Activities. Responsible Key Contributor Timing 3 (d) The TSE Contractor must participate in Sustainability Forums which will be hosted by the Principal s Representative on a regular (at least monthly) basis. The TSE Contractor is expected to participate by presenting progress updates, sustainability performance information and sustainability lessons learned. Section 3.3 Pre- and 4 (a) The TSE Contractor must identify and implement initiatives that ensure the Project Works and Temporary Works are resilient to the effects of climate change. Section 5. Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor 4 (b) The TSE Contractor must undertake climate change risk assessments in respect to the Project Works and the Temporary Works in accordance with the guidance and requirements included in the TfNSW Climate Risk Assessment Guidelines 06 (9TP-SD-08/.0) and the Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia IS Technical Manual and IS Rating Tool Version., 03 Climate Change Adaptation chapter. Section 5. Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and 4 (c) The TSE Contractor must identify and implement all necessary adaptation measures that comprehensively address risks rated using AS/NZS ISO 3000 Risk Section 5. Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 03 of 4

104 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? management Principles and guidelines as extreme and high. Responsible Key Contributor Sustainability Advisor Timing 4 (d) The TSE Contractor must implement measures to mitigate all extreme and high climate change risks and a minimum of 5 percent of medium climate change risks in respect to the Project Works and Temporary Works. Section 5. Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor 4 (e) The TSE Contractor must ensure that the climate change projections and guidance which underpin the TSE Contractor s climate change risk assessment are the most recent available and are consistent with industry best practice including the Sydney Metro City & Southwest Technical Services - Climate Resilience Report Reference Design (NWRLSRT-PBA-SRT-SU- REP-0000). Section 5. Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and 5 (a) The TSE Contractor must identify and implement low carbon and energy efficiency strategies and initiatives that minimise carbon emissions, energy use and embodied lifecycle impacts associated with the design and of the Project Works and Temporary Works. Section 6.5 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 04 of 4

105 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing 5 (b) The TSE Contractor must undertake greenhouse gas (GHG) assessment and reporting which covers the Contractors Activities, Project Works and Temporary Works, in accordance with the requirements of Transport for NSW s Carbon Estimate and Reporting Tool (CERT). Reporting associated with the use of the CERT must be provided to the Principal s Representative. Section 6.6 Sustainability Coordinator Pre- and 5 (c) The TSE Contractor must undertake energy modelling that incorporates electrical energy consumption and fuel consumption as well as any on-site renewable energy generation and renewable energy sourced from the main electricity grid for the of the Project Works and Temporary Works. The energy modelling must be used to establish a baseline against which the benefits of energy efficiency initiatives can be measured. Section 6.3 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and 5 (d) The TSE Contractor must reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 0% from the project baseline greenhouse gas footprint, to be determined using the TfNSW Carbon Estimation and Reporting Tool (CERT). Section 6.4 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor 5 (e) The TSE Contractor must incorporate energy efficiency into all aspects of the Project Works, the Temporary Works and the TSE Contractor s Activities, including Section 6.5 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 05 of 4

106 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? reducing fuel usage associated with the TSE Contractor s Activities. Responsible Key Contributor Sustainability Advisor Timing 5 (f) The TSE Contractor must minimise carbon emissions using: (i) energy consumption avoidance, reduction, and energy efficiency strategies; (ii) low carbon transportation options; (iii) alternate fuels; and Section 6.5 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and (iv) feasible onsite sources of renewable energy generation. 5 (g) The TSE Contractor must incentivise public and shared transport use and develop and implement green travel plans for the TSE Contractor's personnel and Subcontractor s personnel engaged in the TSE Contractor s Activities. Section 5.8 Construction Traffic Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EN-PLN-0003) Traffic Construction s Interface Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Construction 5 (h) The TSE Contractor must identify and implement feasible opportunities for using onsite sources of renewable energy. Sections 5.7, 6.5 and Element Sustainability targets Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 06 of 4

107 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing 5 (i) The TSE Contractor must ensure that, as a minimum, 5% of the electricity needs of the TSE Contractor s Activities is offset through either one or a combination of the following: (i) purchase of Australian carbon offsets credits; and/or (ii) purchase of renewable energy from an Australian Government accredited renewable energy supplier. Section 6.5 and Element Sustainability targets Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and 5 (j) The TSE Contractor must ensure that all vehicles, plant and equipment, including tunnelling equipment and tunnel ventilation systems, are: Section 6.5 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and (i) selected and operated for optimum energy efficiency; (ii) not left idling when not in use; Sustainability Advisor (iii) fitted with catalytic convertors, diesel particulate filters or equivalent devices where reasonable and feasible; and (iv) well maintained and serviced in accordance with relevant equipment maintenance documentation to reduce emissions due to poor engine performance. 5 (k) The TSE Contractor must use a minimum 5% bio diesel mix for all diesel powered plant and equipment and a minimum 0% blended ethanol mix for all petrol powered plant and equipment where practicable. Section 6.5 and Element Sustainability targets Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 07 of 4

108 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Sustainability Advisor Timing 6 (a) The TSE Contractor must identify and implement initiatives that enhance community benefits. Section 5.4 Senior Stakeholder and Communications Pre- and 6 (b) The TSE Contractor must implement at least two initiatives which will provide tangible benefits to local community groups during the period. Section 5.4 and Element Sustainability targets Senior Stakeholder and Communications Pre- and 6 (c) The TSE Contractor must implement at least two initiatives which will provide tangible benefits to the broader local community beyond the period. Section 5.4 and Element Sustainability targets Senior Stakeholder and Communications Pre- and 6 (d) For the purposes of this section 6 the local community comprises communities in the same local government area as the TSE Contractor s Activities, prioritising communities most impacted by the TSE Contractor s Activities where possible. Section 5.4 and Element Sustainability targets Senior Stakeholder and Communications Pre- and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 08 of 4

109 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing 6 (e) The TSE Contractor must develop and implement safety initiatives in accordance with the principles of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) to reduce the likelihood of crime being committed within and around the Construction Site. Visual Amenity Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-0000) Design Team Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Safety Pre-Construction and Construction 6 (f) The TSE Contractor must ensure that Temporary Works that are visible to or accessible to the public are graffiti resistant, and vandal resistant. Visual Amenity Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-0000) Design Team Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre-Construction and Construction Safety 6 (g) The TSE Contractor must consult with and incorporate the requirements of stakeholders and the community in the design and of the Temporary Works. Section 5.4, 5.7 and Element Sustainability targets Senior Stakeholder and Communications Pre- and 6 (h) The TSE Contractor must develop a digital model that visually demonstrates the progress of the Project Works and Temporary Works over time in consultation with the Principal s Representative. Community Communication Strategy (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-SH-PLN-046) 7 (a) The TSE Contractor must minimise total water consumption and potable water consumption by: (i) using water efficient controls, fixtures and fittings; Section 5. Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and (ii) collecting, treating and reusing water; SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 09 of 4

110 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? (iii) using recycled water or treated water; (iv) harvesting and reusing rainwater; (v) using water from recycled water networks where reasonable and feasible; and (vi) collecting, treating and reusing groundwater and stormwater. Responsible Key Contributor Sustainability Advisor Timing 7 (b) The TSE Contractor must undertake a water balance study that identifies the sources, uses and estimated quantities of potable and non-potable water which will be created and used in the performance of the TSE Contractor s Activities. The water balance study must identify opportunities to reduce water demand and use non-potable water instead of potable water. Section 5. Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and 7 (c) The TSE Contractor must not use potable water as a substitute for non-potable water where on-site or local sources of non-potable water are suitable for the TSE Contractor s Activities and are available. Section 5. Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor 7 (d) The TSE Contractor must reuse a minimum of 80% of concrete production operation water into concrete production at onsite or offsite batching plants for all concrete used on the project. Suspended solids content must be controlled such that the water density is less Section 5. Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 0 of 4

111 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? than.0 g/ml and the suspended solids content does not exceed 5,000 ppm. Responsible Key Contributor Sustainability Advisor Timing 8. (a) The TSE Contractor must identify and implement waste minimisation initiatives and material selection strategies to minimise the embodied carbon and lifecycle impacts of waste and materials associated with the of the Project Works and Temporary Works. Sections 5.3 and 7.0 Construction Waste and Recycling Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-000) Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Project Environment Pre- and 8. (b) The TSE Contractor must reduce materials use through materials avoidance and reduction strategies and minimise materials volumes through design refinement, planning and methods. Section 5.3 Construction s Sustainability Advisor Pre- and 8. (c) The TSE Contractor must minimise embodied carbon and lifecycle impacts by, where practicable, using: (i) blended cement that contains waste industrial products such as fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag; Section 5.3 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and (ii) low carbon concrete; Sustainability Advisor (iii) recycled steel, including in concrete reinforcing; and (iv) low embodied carbon material for any tunnel annular grouting. SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page of 4

112 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing 8. (d) Concrete used in the Project Works and Temporary Works must meet the requirements set out in Table 8.: Table 8.: Maximum cementitious content Design Concrete Characteristic Compressive Strength Up to and including 0 MPa Up to and including 5 MPa Up to and including 3 MPa Up to and including 49 MPa 50MPa and above Maximum Cementitious Content (weight in kg per cubic metre of concrete) (550 in harbour zone) Section 5.3 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and 8. (e) The Maximum Cementitious Content in table 8. above, is inclusive of general purpose cement, fly ash and slag. Section 5.3 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor 8. (f) The cement content in all concrete, excepting shotcrete, used in the Project Works and Temporary Works shall contain fly ash or ground granulated blast furnace slag in compliance with the following requirements: Section 5.3 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page of 4

113 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? (i) for concrete elements that are nominally thicker than 600 mm, excluding local discrete thickening, and where the design water/cementitious ratio is less than 0.40, the cementitious content must contain at least 5% fly ash or 50% slag; (ii) for concrete elements less than or equal to 600 mm in thickness, the cementitious content must contain at least 5% fly ash or 40% slag; (iii) concrete elements that have a fly ash content which is greater than or equal to 50% of the total cementitious content or a slag content which is greater than or equal to 70% of the total cementitious content must where practicable receive a minimum of 7 days of continuous moist curing after casting; and (iv) as part of concrete mix design trials, the TSE Contractor shall demonstrate that cement replacement with fly ash or slag has been maximised within the various technical constraints such as availability of product, strength gain and control of temperature. Responsible Key Contributor Sustainability Advisor Timing 8. (g) The TSE Contractor must use post-consumer, postindustrial recycled material or waste materials, including crushed glass, recycled aggregate, tyre derived aggregate, and recycled materials for any noise attenuation devices where practicable. Section 5.3 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 3 of 4

114 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing 8. (h) The TSE Contractor must use reusable formwork and reuse and demolition waste where practicable. Section 5.3 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor 8. (i) The TSE Contractor must source 00% of all timber products used in the Project Works and Temporary Works from either re-used timber, post-consumer recycled timber or from Forestry Stewardship Council (FSC) or Programme for Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) certified timber suppliers within Australia. Section 5.3 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Sustainability Advisor Pre- and 8. (j) The TSE Contractor must use low Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) sealants and adhesives and low emission formaldehyde composite wood products in the Project Works and the Temporary Works Section 5.3 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor 8. (k) All surface coatings used by the TSE Contractor must comply with the Australian Paint Approval Scheme (APAS) Volatile Organic Compounds Limits where fit for purpose. Section 5.3 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 4 of 4

115 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Sustainability Advisor Timing 8. (l) The TSE Contractor must avoid the production of hazardous waste. Construction Waste Management and Recycling Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-000) Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Project Environment Pre- and 8. (m) TSE Contractor must ensure that all: (i) concrete used in the of the Project Works and the Temporary Work is supplied by members of the Cement Concrete and Aggregate Association of Australia (CCAA) or a similar international association or organisation; Section 7.0 Construction s Procurement Pre- and (ii) steel used in the of the Project Works and the Temporary Work is supplied by suppliers that are certified under the Australasian Certification Authority for Reinforcing and Structural Steels (ACRS) or a demonstrated equivalent approved association or organisation; (iii) steel used in the of the Project Works and the Temporary Work is sourced from steelmakers that are current member of the Worldsteel Climate Action Programme; (iv) fabricated structural steel products should be specified in accordance with AS 53 Fabrication and Erection of Steelwork and certified through the National Structural Steelwork Compliance Scheme; SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 5 of 4

116 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? (v) at least 60% of all reinforcing steel is produced using energy-reducing processes in its manufacture (measured by average mass by steelmaker annually); and (vi) PVC used in the of the Project Works and the Temporary Work is supplied by suppliers that demonstrate compliance with the Green Building Council of Australia Best Practice Guidelines for PVC in the Built Environment. Responsible Key Contributor Timing 8. (n) The percentage of steel sourced from Australian manufacturers as a percentage of the total must be recorded and reported to the Principal s Representative. Section 7.0 Construction s Contracts Pre- and 8. (a) The TSE Contractor must ensure that at least 95% of inert and non-hazardous and demolition waste, excluding spoil, and at least 60% of office waste is recycled or alternatively beneficially reused. Construction Waste and Recycling Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-000) N/A N/A 8. (b) The TSE Contractor must negotiate and implement packaging take-back arrangements with suppliers. Construction Waste and Recycling Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-000) N/A N/A 8. (c) The TSE Contractor must select compostable or reusable temporary erosion control devices where practicable. Construction Soil, Water and Groundwater Management Plan N/A N/A SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 6 of 4

117 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-0004) Responsible Key Contributor Timing 8. (d) The TSE Contractor must provide recycling facilities within the Construction Site where practicable. Construction Waste and Recycling Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-000) N/A N/A 8. (e) The TSE Contractor must identify and implement opportunities for recycling and reuse of non-putrescible general solid wastes (other than and demolition waste and office waste). Construction Waste and Recycling Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-000) N/A N/A 8.3 (a) The TSE Contractor must identify and implement initiatives to both reduce spoil quantities which will be generated during the performance of the TSE Contractor s Activities and maximise the beneficial reuse of spoil. Spoil Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-0009) N/A N/A 8.3 (b) The TSE Contractor must ensure that 00% of reusable spoil is beneficially reused in accordance with the spoil reuse hierarchy identified in the Environmental Documents and is not disposed to landfill. Spoil Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-0009) N/A N/A 8.3 (c) The TSE Contractor must ensure that the environmental and social impacts of spoil transfer and reuse are effectively managed and minimised. Spoil Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-0009) N/A N/A 9 (a) The TSE Contractor must identify and implement pollution control initiatives and target zero major pollution incidents. Section 5.5 Construction Environmental Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 7 of 4

118 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Management Plan (SMCSWTSE-JCG- TPW-EM-PLN-0000) Responsible Key Contributor Project Environment Timing 9 (b) The TSE Contractor must, where practicable, ensure that all excavators and mobile cranes used for the TSE Contractors Activities, which are onsite for more than three months, comply with comply with United States Environmental Protection Agency Tier 4 exhaust emission standards. Section 6.5 Plant and Equipment Pre- and 0 (a) The TSE Contractor must identify and implement sustainable procurement initiatives that provide environmental and social improvement. Section 5.6 Contracts Pre- and Sustainability Advisor Approvals, Environment and Sustainability 0 (b) The TSE Contractor must develop, implement and maintain a sustainable procurement policy and processes that comply with the requirements of BS 8903 Principles and framework for procuring sustainably Guide. Embedded in TSE Works Environment and Sustainability Policy (Appendix A) See also Section 5.6 Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Pre- and Sustainability Advisor SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 8 of 4

119 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? Responsible Key Contributor Timing 0 (c) The TSE Contractor must ensure that its Subcontractors and suppliers comply with the sustainability requirements set out in this Appendix A.7. Section 5.6 Contracts Pre- and 0 (d) The TSE Contractor must ensure sustainability training is provided to high impact suppliers. High impact suppliers are defined as suppliers of materials, equipment or services which have potentially significant environmental, social or socio-economic impacts. Section 5.6 Contracts Sustainability Advisor Pre- and 0 (e) The TSE Contractor must use a risk based approach to ensure that where high impact materials are sourced from a developing country, the supplier's operations are in compliance with local regulations and do not contravene internationally accepted human rights standards (through compliance with the International Labour Organization's Fundamental Conventions and commitment to the UN Global Compact principles). Sections 5.6 and 7.0 Contracts Sustainability Advisor Pre- and (a) The TSE Contractor must install and use rainwater harvesting and reuse solutions at temporary site facilities including, but not limited to pre-cast facilities, acoustic sheds and temporary accommodation buildings. Section 5. and 5.7 Construction s Site establishment (b) The TSE Contractor must develop a strategy for the installation of temporary renewable energy installations at temporary site facilities and Temporary Works, considering: Sections 5.7 and 6.5 Sustainability Advisor During design and SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 9 of 4

120 PART B SYSTEMS AND TOOLS No. Requirement How will JHCPBG meet the Expectation? (i) life cycle cost analysis; (ii) overshadowing; and (iii) reuse of modular systems. Responsible Key Contributor Approvals, Environment and Sustainability Timing (c) The TSE Contractor must implement renewable energy installations, where practicable. Sections 5.7 and 6.5 During design and Sustainability Advisor Approvals, Environment and Sustainability (a) The TSE Contractor must, as a minimum, achieve the sustainability targets identified in Table.. Element Sustainability targets During design and Sustainability Advisor Approvals, Environment and Sustainability SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 0 of 4

121 APPENDICES Appendix A Environment and Sustainability Policy Statement SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page of 4

122 APPENDICES Appendix B Excerpt from TSE Combined Audit Schedule SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page of 4

123 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PM-SCH TSE Combined Audit Schedule (excerpt) Audit ID Auditee Function Location Audit Scope Type Project Phase Timing/ Frequency Qty Jul-7 Aug-7 Sep-7 Oct-7 Nov-7 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 TSE-04 TSE Contractor Env & Sust Process On Site Independent audit - Sustainability Management Plan (including materials, carbon and energy, green travel) Design & Construction Annually (as confirmed by TfNSW) Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Design Quarterly 5 P Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Construction 6 monthly 7 Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 External review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Design Once during Design phase P Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 Internal review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Construction 3 per year Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Design Prior to ISCA Design rating submission Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Construction Prior to ISCA As Built rating submission Was- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA Off Site ISCA Was- Auditing to final waste destination Construction 6 Monthly 7 KEY P C R X Programmed Complete Rescheduled Cancelled Page of 9

124 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PM-SCH TSE Combined Audit Schedule (excerpt) Dec-7 Jan-8 Feb-8 Mar-8 Apr-8 Audit Timing/ ID Auditee Function Location Audit Scope Project Phase Qty Type Frequency W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 TSE-04 TSE Contractor Env & Sust Process On Site Independent audit - Sustainability Management Plan (including materials, carbon and energy, green travel) Design & Construction Annually (as confirmed by TfNSW) P Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Design Quarterly 5 P P Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Construction 6 monthly 7 P Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 External review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Design Once during Design phase Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 Internal review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Construction 3 per year P Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Design Prior to ISCA Design rating submission Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Construction Prior to ISCA As Built rating submission Was- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA Off Site ISCA Was- Auditing to final waste destination Construction 6 Monthly 7 KEY P C R X Programmed Complete Rescheduled Cancelled Page of 9

125 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PM-SCH TSE Combined Audit Schedule (excerpt) May-8 Jun-8 Jul-8 Aug-8 Sep-8 Audit Timing/ ID Auditee Function Location Audit Scope Project Phase Qty Type Frequency W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 TSE-04 TSE Contractor Env & Sust Process On Site Independent audit - Sustainability Management Plan (including materials, carbon and energy, green travel) Design & Construction Annually (as confirmed by TfNSW) Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Design Quarterly 5 P P Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Construction 6 monthly 7 P Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 External review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Design Once during Design phase Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 Internal review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Construction 3 per year P P Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Design Prior to ISCA Design rating submission Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Construction Prior to ISCA As Built rating submission Was- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA Off Site ISCA Was- Auditing to final waste destination Construction 6 Monthly 7 P KEY P C R X Programmed Complete Rescheduled Cancelled Page 3 of 9

126 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PM-SCH TSE Combined Audit Schedule (excerpt) Oct-8 Nov-8 Dec-8 Jan-9 Feb-9 Audit Timing/ ID Auditee Function Location Audit Scope Project Phase Qty Type Frequency W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 TSE-04 TSE Contractor Env & Sust Process On Site Independent audit - Sustainability Management Plan (including materials, carbon and energy, green travel) Design & Construction Annually (as confirmed by TfNSW) Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Design Quarterly 5 Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Construction 6 monthly 7 Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 External review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Design Once during Design phase Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 Internal review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Construction 3 per year P Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Design Prior to ISCA Design rating submission P Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Construction Prior to ISCA As Built rating submission Was- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA Off Site ISCA Was- Auditing to final waste destination Construction 6 Monthly 7 P KEY P C R X Programmed Complete Rescheduled Cancelled Page 4 of 9

127 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PM-SCH TSE Combined Audit Schedule (excerpt) Mar-9 Apr-9 May-9 Jun-9 Jul-9 Audit Timing/ ID Auditee Function Location Audit Scope Project Phase Qty Type Frequency W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 TSE-04 TSE Contractor Env & Sust Process On Site Independent audit - Sustainability Management Plan (including materials, carbon and energy, green travel) Design & Construction Annually (as confirmed by TfNSW) Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Design Quarterly 5 Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Construction 6 monthly 7 P Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 External review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Design Once during Design phase Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 Internal review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Construction 3 per year P P Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Design Prior to ISCA Design rating submission Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Construction Prior to ISCA As Built rating submission Was- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA Off Site ISCA Was- Auditing to final waste destination Construction 6 Monthly 7 P KEY P C R X Programmed Complete Rescheduled Cancelled Page 5 of 9

128 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PM-SCH TSE Combined Audit Schedule (excerpt) Aug-9 Sep-9 Oct-9 Nov-9 Dec-9 Audit Timing/ ID Auditee Function Location Audit Scope Project Phase Qty Type Frequency W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 TSE-04 TSE Contractor Env & Sust Process On Site Independent audit - Sustainability Management Plan (including materials, carbon and energy, green travel) Design & Construction Annually (as confirmed by TfNSW) Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Design Quarterly 5 Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Construction 6 monthly 7 P Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 External review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Design Once during Design phase Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 Internal review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Construction 3 per year P Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Design Prior to ISCA Design rating submission Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Construction Prior to ISCA As Built rating submission Was- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA Off Site ISCA Was- Auditing to final waste destination Construction 6 Monthly 7 P KEY P C R X Programmed Complete Rescheduled Cancelled Page 6 of 9

129 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PM-SCH TSE Combined Audit Schedule (excerpt) Jan-0 Feb-0 Mar-0 Apr-0 May-0 Audit Timing/ ID Auditee Function Location Audit Scope Project Phase Qty Type Frequency W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 TSE-04 TSE Contractor Env & Sust Process On Site Independent audit - Sustainability Management Plan (including materials, carbon and energy, green travel) Design & Construction Annually (as confirmed by TfNSW) Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Design Quarterly 5 Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Construction 6 monthly 7 P Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 External review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Design Once during Design phase Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 Internal review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Construction 3 per year P P Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Design Prior to ISCA Design rating submission Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Construction Prior to ISCA As Built rating submission Was- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA Off Site ISCA Was- Auditing to final waste destination Construction 6 Monthly 7 KEY P C R X Programmed Complete Rescheduled Cancelled Page 7 of 9

130 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PM-SCH TSE Combined Audit Schedule (excerpt) Jun-0 Jul-0 Aug-0 Sep-0 Oct-0 Audit Timing/ ID Auditee Function Location Audit Scope Project Phase Qty Type Frequency W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 TSE-04 TSE Contractor Env & Sust Process On Site Independent audit - Sustainability Management Plan (including materials, carbon and energy, green travel) Design & Construction Annually (as confirmed by TfNSW) Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Design Quarterly 5 Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Construction 6 monthly 7 P Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 External review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Design Once during Design phase Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 Internal review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Construction 3 per year P P Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Design Prior to ISCA Design rating submission Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Construction Prior to ISCA As Built rating submission Was- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA Off Site ISCA Was- Auditing to final waste destination Construction 6 Monthly 7 P KEY P C R X Programmed Complete Rescheduled Cancelled Page 8 of 9

131 SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PM-SCH TSE Combined Audit Schedule (excerpt) Nov-0 Dec-0 Audit Timing/ ID Auditee Function Location Audit Scope Project Phase Qty Type Frequency W W W3 W4 W W W3 W4 TSE-04 TSE Contractor Env & Sust Process On Site Independent audit - Sustainability Management Plan (including materials, carbon and energy, green travel) Design & Construction Annually (as confirmed by TfNSW) Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Design Quarterly 5 Man-3 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-3 Independent sustainability review Construction 6 monthly 7 Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 External review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Design Once during Design phase Man-4 TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Man-4 Internal review/audit of environment and sustainability management system Construction 3 per year Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Design Prior to ISCA Design rating submission Ene- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA On Site ISCA Ene- (refer to Sustainability Management Plan audit) Construction Prior to ISCA As Built rating submission Was- TSE Contractor Env & Sust ISCA Off Site ISCA Was- Auditing to final waste destination Construction 6 Monthly 7 P KEY P C R X Programmed Complete Rescheduled Cancelled Page 9 of 9

132 APPENDICES Appendix C TSE ISCA Weightings Assessment (planning phase) SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 3 of 4

133 Design Project or Assest Input Infrastructure Sustainability Weightings Assessment Enter details Name of Infrastructure Project/Asset: Tunnels and Station Excavation Rating Type: Design * Address of Infrastructure Project/Asset: Sydney Metro City & Southwest City/Suburb: Sydney Postcode: 000 State: NSW Registrant (organisation): Assessor (person): Proponent/Client: Designer: Main Constructor: Operator: Other key consultants: Sydney Metro Suzanna Remmerswaal Sydney Metro PB AECOM Joint Venture TBC TBC TBC Local Planning Authority: Description of project/asset: City of Sydney Tunnels and Station Excavation Construction/Maintenance Methodology: D&C Project start date: 08 Design completion date: 00 Construction practical completion date: 0 Total delivery cost (design and ): 5,000,000,000 Annual operating : Materiality Assessment Date: 6/6/6 Team involved in Materiality Assessment: (Name, role, stakeholders represented) Suzanna Remmerswaal David Fox Jo Haggerty Stuart Hodgson

134 Design Weighting Assessment Version:. Infrastructure Sustainability Weightings Rating type: As Built Release date: 06/04/06 Assessment All Q's answered? Yes Original release date: 06/04/06 No. Cat Credit Credit Name Credit and Category Aims Question Question Question 3 Mat Score Default Alt Mat Score Justification Final Mat Score Points Category / Credits Final Points Category / Credits Evidence Required Evidence Supplied Man Man- Sustainability leadership and To integrate sustainability into NA NA NA No commitment management systems and approach. Man- Risk and opportunity management This has been assigned a default Man-3 Organisational structure, roles materiality score of and responsibilities Man-4 Inspection and auditing Man-5 Reporting and review Man-6 Knowledge sharing.5.5 Man-7 Decision-making To assess the requirements for No NA NA incorporating sustainability aspects into decision making. Pro Pro- Commitment to sustainable To integrate sustainability into NA NA NA No procurement procurement systems. Pro- Identification of suppliers.40.9 Pro-3 Supplier evaluation and contract This has been assigned a default award materiality score of. Pro-4 Managing supplier performance Cli Cli- Climate change risk assessment To assess climate change risks and Long (>50 Yes NA Design life requirement for climate change years) Location map showing proximity to Cli- Adaptation options adaptation measures natural hazards 4 Ene Ene- Energy and carbon monitoring and reduction To understand the potential for minimising energy use from non Rail (electric) Yes NA Description of project/asset Construction/maintenance Ene- Renewable energy renewable sources and GHG emissions methodology across the infrastructure lifecycle. 5 Wat Wat- Water use monitoring and To understand the potential for No Yes Yes 3 Note for TSE only reduction minimising water use from potable In terms of Wat- Replace potable water sources across the infrastructure operation of methodology 6 Mat Mat- Materials footprint measurement and reduction To identify the lifecycle environmental impacts of materials throughout the High (>50%) Low (<0%) NA infrastructure lifecycle. Mat- Environmentally labelled products and supply chains Description of project/asset Construction/maintenance Construction/maintenance methodology 7 Dis Dis- Receiving Water Quality To identify impacts on local receiving water quality across project/asset's lifecycle. 8 Dis- Noise To identify noise impacts across project/asset's lifecycle. 9 Dis-3 Vibration To identify vibration impacts across project/asset's lifecycle. Yes Yes Yes 3 Confirm receiving water bodies Rail (electric) Environmental licence Risk register Location map showing receiving waters Yes Adjacent Construction/maintenance methodology Location map showing noise receivers Yes Adjacent NA Construction/maintenance methodology Location map showing vibration receivers

135 Design Weighting Assessment 0 Dis-4 Air Quality To identify air quality impacts across project/asset's lifecycle. Rail (electric) Yes Yes (urban).65.7 Location map showing surrounding population density Dis-5 Light Pollution To identify impacts across project/asset's lifecycle. Rail (electric) Yes Adjacent 3 TSE may involve night works, but not likely to be above ground Construction/maintenance methodology Location map showing light receivers Lan Lan- Previous Land Use To identify land that has previously been developed and where it can be reused. This has been assigned a default materiality score of. NA NA NA No 3 Lan- Conservation of on-site resources To identify where soil resources can be conserved. Yes NA NA Construction/maintenance methodology 4 Lan-3 Contamination and remediation To assess contamination risks and Present NA NA Contamination at.3.9 Contamination study perform sustainable remediation. and low Waterloo most significant 5 Lan-4 Flooding To identify risks from flooding. Yes Yes NA Flood maps Location map showing potential flood impacts 6 Was Was- Waste management To identify the potential for sustainable waste management plans and practices. High (>50%) Low (<0%) Yes Construction/maintenance methodology Was- Diversion from landfill No 7 Was-3 De/ Disassembly/ To understand the potential for design Long (>50 High No Scope out? De statement Adaptability and planning for de, disassembly and adaptability of infrastructure in the future. years) (>50%) 8 Eco Eco- Ecoloigcal value To identify impacts to local ecological Low Distant NA Map showing footprint Eco- Habitat connectivity value and habitat connectivity. (<0%) (>00m) and ecological habitat 9 Hea Hea- Community health and wellbeing To identify the potential for making a positive contribution to community health and wellbeing. NA NA NA No This has been assigned a default materiality score of. 0 Hea- Crime prevention To assess the impact to design and Yes NA NA practice in response to the likelihood of crime. Her Her- Heritage assessment and To assess the management and Yes (or Yes NA 4 Heritage items Location map showing heritage management monitoring of impacts on heritage. unknown) above tunnelling including value Her- Monitoring and management of works heritage Sta Sta- Stakeholder engagement To assess the level of risk atributed to Yes NA NA Stakeholder analysis strategy the engagement, and consideration of Sta- Level of engagement stakeholders and their concerns, in the Sta-3 Effective communication context of the project/asset operation Sta-4 Addressing community concerns and maintenance Urb Urb- Urban design To identify the potential for adoption of Rail Yes NA 3 Very little Description of project/asset Urb- Implementation best practice urban design principles. (electric) (urban) permanent works NA Inn Inn- Innovation Bonus credit This has been assigned a default materiality score of. NA NA NA No

136 Design Weightings Chart Infrastructure Sustainability Weightings Assessment Charts Category Weightings Default Final Man Pro Cli Ene Wat Mat Dis Lan Was Eco Hea Her Sta Urb Inn Credit Weightings Default Final 4 0 Points Category Weightings - Default Category Weightings - Final 5% 4% 9% % % 5% 7% 3% 9% 9% % 9% % 4% 5% % 4% 0% % 4% % 7% 7% 4% 7% % 6% 3% 8% 9% Man Pro Cli Ene Wat Mat Dis Lan Was Eco Hea Her Sta Urb Inn Man Pro Cli Ene Wat Mat Dis Lan Was Eco Hea Her Sta Urb Inn Infrastructure Sustainability Rating Tool (Version.0) 9/0/0

137 Sustainability leadership and commitment Organisational structure, roles and responsibilities Organisational structure, roles and responsibilities Inspection and auditing Inspection and auditing Inspection and auditing Inspection and auditing Inspection and auditing Inspection and auditing Reporting and review Knowledge sharing Knowledge sharing Decision-making Decision-making Decision-making Decision-making Decision-making Design Scorecard Assessor progress tracking Assessment Round One Verification Round One Assessment Round Two Verification Round Two Cost - Benefit Tracking Infrastructure Sustainability Scorecard Level Materiality Score Points per level Score possible Target credit? Target level Target score Owner (name/team) Status % Complete Categ ory Credit Title Criteria Man Man- There are commitments to mitigating negative Sustainability leadership and commitment Completed s Man % Man--- environmental, social and economic impacts Man Man- These commitments are embedded into sustainability ## Sustainability leadership and commitment Man--- objectives and/or targets Man Man- Sustainability leadership and commitment The requirements for Level are achieved Man--- Sustainability Man- Man Man- leadership and The sustainability objectives and/or targets are reflected 8 0 Sustainability leadership and Man--- commitment in project contracts Sustainability leadership and commitment Man Man- 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Man--3-0 Man Man- 3 The sustainability commitments go beyond mitigating 0 3 negative impacts to restorative actions (ie net positive Man--3- benefits for society and the environment) Sustainability leadership and commitment Man Man- 3 The sustainability commitments are publicly stated Man Man Man- Risk and opportunity management Environmental, social and economic risks are assessed < Select > s 0 0% Man--- Risk and opportunity management Man Man- Risk and The risk assessment is updated at least annually Man--- Man- Man Man- opportunity Risk and opportunity The requirements for Level are achieved Man--- management Man Man- Environmental, social and economic opportunities are 0 Risk and opportunity management Man--- also assessed Man Man-3 A member(s) of the senior management team has Organisational structure, roles and responsibilities < Select > s 0 0% Man-3-- central responsibility for managing sustainability Man Man-3 A principal participant in the team is an IS Accredited 0 Organisational Professional whose role is to provide sustainability Man-3-- Man Man An independent sustainability professional is engaged to Man-3-- monitor and review sustainability performance Man- structure, roles advice Man-3 3 and Organisational structure, roles and responsibilities The requirements for Level are achieved Man-3-- Man-3 Actions General notes Level assessed Score assessed Rulings used Evidence Notes on evidence Level verified Verification meeting Level verified Score verified Level assessed Score assessed Rulings used Evidence Notes on evidence Case manager comments Verifier comments Level verified Verifier comments Level verified Verification meeting Level verified Score verified Initiative name Cost description Cost ($) Benefit description Benefit ($) Man Man-4 Internal environmental inspections of site management are undertaken at least weekly during s < Select > 0% Man Man Man Man Man-4 Man-4 Man- Man-4 4 Inspection and auditing Environmental audits of the management system are conducted. At least one external review or audit is conducted during design. During at least four environmental audits are conducted per year where at least one is external. Internal sustainability inspections of site management are undertaken at least weekly during Man-4-- Man-4--3 Man-4-- Man Man Management Systems Man-4 Man-4 Sustainability audits of the management system are conducted. At least one external review or audit is conducted during design. During at least four sustainability audits are conducted per year where at least one is external. Reporting and review to senior management Man Man-5 The sustainability report includes sustainability objectives and/or targets and identifies areas for improvement Reporting and review annually by senior management Man Man-5 Man- Reporting and review and The requirements for Level are achieved Man 5 Man-5 review Sustainability performance is reported at least quarterly Reporting and review to senior management Man Man-5 Reporting and review 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Man Man-5 Reporting and review 3 Sustainability performance is reported annually publicly < Select > s 0% Man Reporting and review Man participation Sustainability knowledge is shared within the project < Select > s 0% Man Knowledge sharing Man-4-- Man-4--3 Man-5-- Man-5--3 Man-5-- Man-5-- Man-5-3- Man-5-3- Man Man-6 Knowledge sharing The requirements for Level are achieved Man-6-- Man Man Man-6 Sustainability knowledge is shared beyond project boundaries to parent organisations and/or other key Man-6-- stakeholders. Man- Knowledge Man-6 Sustainability knowledge is shared from outside the Knowledge 6 sharing Man-6--3 project/asset onto the project. Man Man-6 Knowledge sharing 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Man-6-3- Man Man-6 3 Sustainability knowledge is shared beyond project and Man-6-3- Knowledge sharing 3 key stakeholder boundaries to the wider industry. Man Man-6 3 Sustainability knowledge sharing includes 'lessons learnt (that had negative consequences) as well as Man 'good practices'. Man Man-7 For significant issues, decision making is characterised s by: Considering options including business as usual and < Select > 0% Man proven approaches taken in comparable situations Man Man-7 And evaluating options primarily on the basis of financial aspects but considering environmental, social and Man-7-- economic aspects qualitatively through risk assessment, constraint analysis or other non-scored means Decision-making of infrastructure asset Man Man-7 For significant issues, decision making is characterised by: Considering options including business as usual and Decision-making proven approaches taken in comparable situations Man Man-7 And evaluating options by considering environmental, 7 social and economic aspects through the use of multicriteria analysis or other scored means; Man Man-7 And evaluating options based on the forecast useful life Decision-making of infrastructure asset Man Man-7 3 For significant issues, decision making is characterised by: Considering options including business as usual, nonasset, technical limits and an option that specifically aim to address sustainability aspects; Man-7--3 Man-7-- Man-7-- Man-7--3 Man-7-3-

138 Decision-making Decision-making Commitment to sustainable procurement Identification of suppliers Supplier evaluation and contract award Managing supplier performance Climate change risk assessment Climate change risk assessment Climate change risk assessment Climate change risk assessment Adaptation options Adaptation options Adaptation options Adaptation options Energy and carbon monitoring and reduction Energy and carbon monitoring and reduction Use of renewable energy Water use monitoring and reduction Replace potable water Design Scorecard Procurement and Purchasing Climate Change Adapation Energy and Carbon -3 scaled Water Pro Pro- aspects Pro Pro- Pro Man Man-7 And evaluating options by considering environmental, 3 social and economic aspects through incorporating their Man-7-3- value into cost-benefit analysis or other quantified means; Man Man-7 3 And evaluating options based on the forecast useful life of infrastructure asset and using social rates of return for Man discounting There is a commitment to require environmental to be considered in the procurement process < Select > s 0% Pro Commitment to sustainable procurement There is a commitment to require sustainability aspects Pro--- Commitment to sustainable procurement to be considered in the procurement process Commitment to Commitment to procurement Pro- 3 Requirements of Level are achieved Pro--3- sustainable Pro- procurement 3 The sustainable procurement commitments are publicly Pro--3- Pro Commitment to sustainable procurement 3 stated Pro Pro- 3 Sustainable procurement commitments are embedded Pro--3-3 into sustainability objectives and/or targets Pro Pro- of their Pro Pro Pro-3 aspects Pro Pro Pro-4 Potential suppliers requested to provide details environmental policy and its implementation < Select > s 0% Pro Identification of suppliers Pro- Potential suppliers requested to provide details of their Identification of suppliers Pro--- Pro- sustainability policy and its implementation Identification of Identification of Pro- 3 Requirements for Level are achieved Pro--3- suppliers Pro Pro Pro- 3 Engagement with potential suppliers is undertaken to 3 explain sustainability requirements and expectations, Pro--3- and to help stimulate innovation in relation to sustainability through the procurement process. Supplier evaluation considers environmenta through use of qualitative criteria < Select > s 0% Pro Supplier evaluation and contract award Pro Pro-3 Supplier evaluation considers sustainability aspects Supplier evaluation and contract award Pro-3-- through use of qualitative criteria. Supplier Pro-3 Supplier contracts incorporate sustainability objectives Supplier evaluation and contract award and Pro contract award and/or targets Pro Pro-3 Supplier evaluation and contract award 3 Requirements for Level are achieved Pro-3-3- Pro Pro-3 3 Supplier evaluation considers sustainability aspects through use of multi-criteria analysis or other scored Pro-3-3- means. Suppliers have environmental objectives and/or targets < Select > s 0% Pro Managing supplier performance Pro Pro-4 Supplier environmental performance is monitored for the duration of contracts, against the objectives and/or Pro-4-- targets. Managing supplier performance Pro Pro-4 Requirements for Level are achieved Pro-4-- Managing Pro Pro-4 Managing supplier performance Suppliers have sustainability objectives and/or targets. Pro performance Pro Pro-4 Poor sustainability performance or non-compliance is Managing supplier performance Pro-4--3 actively managed Managing supplier performance Pro Pro-4 3 Requirements for Level are achieved Pro-4-3- Pro Pro-4 Contract managers work with suppliers to identify any Managing supplier performance 3 Pro-4-3- emerging or new sustainability opportunities Managing supplier performance Pro Pro-4 3 Success is encouraged and rewarded Pro Cli Cli- A readily available climate change projection is identified s and adopted for the asset region over the forecast useful < Select > 0% Cli life of the asset Cli Cli- Direct climate change risks to the asset over the forecast Climate change risk assessment Cli--- useful life are identified and assessed Climate change risk assessment Cli Cli- The requirements of Level are achieved Cli--- Cli Cli- A number of readily available climate change projections are identified and adopted for the asset Cli--- region over the forecast useful life of the asset Cli Cli- Climate change The climate change risk assessment also considered Cli- Climate change risk Cli---3 risk assessment indirect climate change risks to the asset Cli Cli- A multi-disciplinary team participated in identifying Climate change risk assessment Cli---4 climate change risks and issues Climate change risk assessment Cli Cli- 3 The requirements of Level are achieved Cli--3- Cli Cli- 3 Modelling is undertaken to characterise the likely impacts of the projected climate change for all High and Cli--3-3 Extreme priority climate change risks Cli Cli- 3 A comprehensive set of affected external stakeholders participated in identifying climate change risks and Cli--3-3 issues Cli Cli- Adaptation options to treat all extreme and high priority s climate change risks are identified, assessed and On track 0% Cli appropriate measures implemented Cli Cli- After treatment there are no extreme priority residual Adaptation options Cli--- climate change risks Cli Cli- Adaptation options The requirements of Level are achieved Cli--- Cli Cli- Adaptation options to treat 5-50% of all medium priority climate change risks are identified, assessed and Cli--- Adaptation Cli- options appropriate measures implemented Adaptation options Cli Cli- 3 The requirements of Level are achieved Cli--3- Cli Cli- 3 The optimal scale and timing of options is addressed (which may be triggered by when a specific climate Cli--3- threshold is likely to be achieved) Cli Cli- 3 Adaptation options to treat at least 50% of all medium priority climate change risks are identified, assessed and appropriate measures implemented Cli Cli- 3 After treatment there are no high priority residual climate Adaptation options Cli--3-4 change risks Ene Ene- Monitoring and modelling of energy use and GHG s emissions, and actions taken to reduce them is < Select > 0% Ene undertaken, covering at least Scope, Scope and Energy and land clearing across the infrastructure lifecycle Ene Ene- carbon 3 Energy and carbon and reduction The requirements for Level are achieved Ene--3- monitoring and Ene Ene- reduction 3 Monitoring and modelling demonstrates a reduction in GHG emissions compared to a base case footprint. Ene--3- For every reduction up to 30% for Level 3, fractions of Levels may be achieved on a sliding scale. achieved on a sliding scale. Wat Wat- Water use monitoring and reduction Monitoring and modelling of water use, is undertaken < Select > s 0% Wat Ene Ene- Opportunities for use of renewable energy are fully Use of renewable energy < Select > s 0% Ene investigated Use of Use of energy Ene Ene- 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Ene--3- renewable Ene Ene- energy 3 For every substitution of energy from renewable sources 3 up to 40% for Level 3, fractions of Levels may be Ene--3- Wat Wat Water use monitoring and reduction Wat- Water use 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Wat- Wat- monitoring and 3 Monitoring and modelling demonstrates a reduction in reduction water use compared to a base case footprint. Wat--3- Wat--3- For every reduction up to 0% for Level 3, fractions of Levels may be achieved on a sliding scale. Wat Wat- 3 Monitoring and modelling demonstrates that some s Replace potable proportion of total water use is from non-potable sources (substituting for potable) < Select > Wat- water -3-3 scaled 0-3 scaled Fractions of Levels may be achieved on a sliding scale up to 00% for Level 3. 0% Wat

139 Materials footprint measurement and reduction Materials footprint measurement and reduction Receiving water quality Receiving water quality Receiving water quality Receiving water quality Receiving water quality Noise Noise Noise Noise Noise Vibration Vibration Vibration Vibration Vibration Air quality Air quality Air quality Light pollution Light pollution Previous land use Conservation of on site resources Design Scorecard Materials Discharges to Air, Land and Water Dis Dis-3 Dis Measures to mitigate vibration during and 3 operation have been identified and implemented < Select > s 0% Dis Vibration Dis Dis-3 Monitoring of vibration is undertaken at appropriate intervals and in response to complaints during Dis-3-- and operation Dis Dis-3 Vibration The requirements for Level are achieved Dis-3-- Dis Dis-3 For, modelling and monitoring demonstrates no exceedences of vibration goals for Dis-3-- structural damage to buildings and structures. Dis Dis-3 Vibration For operation, modelling and monitoring demonstrates no recurring or major exceedences of vibration goals for Dis-3--3 human comfort criteria Dis Dis-3 No physical damage has been caused to any buildings or structures by vibration caused by or Dis-3--4 operation Dis Dis-3 Vibration 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Dis-3-3- Dis Dis-3 3 For operation, modelling and monitoring demonstrates no exceedences of vibration goals for human comfort Dis-3-3- criteria Dis Dis-4 Measures to minimise adverse impacts to local air s quality during and operation have been < Select > 0% Dis identified and implemented Dis Dis-4 Monitoring of air emissions and/or air quality is undertaken at appropriate intervals and in response to Dis-4-- complaints during and operation Dis-4 Air quality Dis-4 Air quality The requirements for Level are achieved Dis-4-- Dis Dis-4 Monitoring and modelling demonstrates no recurring or major exceedences of air emission or air quality goals Dis Dis-4 Air quality 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Dis-4-3- Dis Dis-4 3 Monitoring and modelling demonstrates no exceedences Air quality Dis-4-3- of air emission or air quality goals Measures to prevent light spill during have been identified and implemented < Select > s 0% Dis Light pollution Dis Dis-5 The lighting design for operation prevents horizontal light spill through compliance with the numerical limits for Dis-5-- obtrusive light in Tables. and. of AS48. Dis Lan Dis-5 Lan- Mat Mat- Mat value have an ISCA Mat Dis Dis- has an ISCA approved Mat- have an ISCA Mat Mat- Monitoring and modelling of materials lifecycle impacts s is undertaken using the Materials Calculator (or other suitable Lifecycle Assessment technique) across the < Select > 0% Mat Materials infrastructure lifecycle Mat Mat- Materials footprint measurement and reduction 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Mat--3- Mat Mat- measurement 3 Monitoring and modelling demonstrates a reduction in and reduction materials lifecycle impacts compared to a base case footprint. Mat--3- For every reduction up to 30% for Level 3, fractions of Levels may be achieved on a sliding scale. Environmentally labelled products and supply chains One material/product Environmentally environmental label < Select > s 0% Mat Mat- labelled 3-9% of materials/products by Environmentally labelled supply chains products and approved environmental label. Mat--- Environmentally labelled products and supply chains approved environmental label. supply chains 3 >9% of materials/products by value Mat--3- Dis Dis- Measures to minimise adverse impacts to receiving s water environmental values during and < Select > 0% Dis operation have been identified and implemented. Dis Dis- Monitoring of water discharges and receiving waters is undertaken at appropriate intervals and at times of Dis--- discharge during and operation Dis Dis- Receiving water quality The requirements for Level are achieved Dis--- Dis Dis- Monitoring and modelling of water discharges and Dis- receiving waters demonstrates no adverse impact on Dis--- Receiving water quality local receiving water environmental values. Dis Dis- The infrastructure does not increase peak stormwater flows for rainfall events of up to a.5 year ARI event Dis---3 discharge Dis Dis- Receiving water quality 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Dis--3- Dis Dis- 3 Opportunities to improve local receiving water quality 3 and/or provide environmental flows have been identified Dis--3- and implemented Dis Dis- 3 Monitoring and modelling demonstrates improvement of Receiving water quality Dis--3-3 local receiving water environmental values Measures to mitigate noise during and 4 operation have been identified and implemented < Select > s 0% Dis Noise Dis Dis- Monitoring of noise is undertaken at appropriate intervals and in response to complaints during and Dis--- operation Dis Dis- Noise The requirements for Level are achieved Dis--- Dis Dis- For, modelling and monitoring demonstrates no recurring or major divergences from Dis--- the noise management process in ISCA approved noise guidelines Dis Dis- Noise For operation, modelling and monitoring and monitoring demonstrates no recurring or major exeedences of Dis---3 noise goals Dis Dis- Noise 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Dis--3- Dis Dis- 3 For, modelling and monitoring demonstrates no divergence from the noise Dis--3-3 management process in ISCA approved noise guidelines Dis Dis- 3 For operation, modelling and monitoring and monitoring Dis--3-3 demonstrates no exeedences of noise goals. Lan- Light pollution Previous land use -3 scaled Scaled The lighting design for operation prevents upward light spill by ensuring that, relative to its particular mounting orientation, 95% (by number) of external public lighting luminaires within the project boundary have an Upward Light Ratio less than 5% (for roads and public spaces this must be less than 3% in accordance with AS58). 0 to >75% of the land used for the project is previously disturbed. Fractions of Levels may be achieved on a sliding scale up to >75% use of previously disturbed land for Level < Select > s 0% Lan Lan Lan- Conservation of topsoils and subsoil has been Conservation of on site resources < Select > s 0% Lan considered Conservation of on site resources Lan Lan- The requirements for Level are achieved Lan--- Lan Lan- All subsoil and topsoil impacted by the project is separated and protected from degradation, erosion or Lan--- Conservation of Lan- mixing with fill or waste on site Lan Lan- 95% of all topsoil (by volume) retains its productivity and Conservation resources of on site Lan---3 is beneficially re-used on or nearby to the project Conservation of on site resources Lan Lan- 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Lan--3- Dis-4-- Dis-5--3

140 Conservation of on site resources Contamination and remediation Contamination and remediation Contamination and remediation Flooding design Flooding design Waste management Waste management Diversion from landfill Diversion from landfill Diversion from landfill De/ Disassembly/ Adaptability De/ Disassembly/ Adaptability Ecological value Habitat connectivity Habitat connectivity Community health and well-being Community health and well-being Community health and well-being Community health and well-being Design Scorecard Land Lan Lan Lan-4 The run-off, flood risk, and potential increased flood risk elsewhere as a result of the project have all been assessed over their expected working life, in line with the requirements of 'Flood plain management in Australia: best practice principles and guidelines' and appropriate flood resilience measures have been included in the design so that there is no increase in flood risk The run-off, flood risk, and potential increased flood risk elsewhere as a result of the project have all been assessed over their expected working life, in line with the requirements of 'Flood plain management in Australia: best practice principles and guidelines' and appropriate flood resilience measures have been included in the design so that there is a significant decrease in flood risk < Select > s 0% Lan Waste Was Was- Diversion from landfill 40 to 60% by volume of office waste Was---3 Was Was- 3 All of the following targets for landfill diversion have been achieved or bettered: Was--3-00% by volume of spoil Was Was- Diversion from landfill 3 >90% by volume of inert and non-hazardous waste Was--3- Was Was- Diversion from landfill 3 >60% by volume of office waste material Was--3-3 Was Was-3 De/ Disassembly/ Adaptability A de plan is developed based on good practice Was Was-3 De/ Disassembly/ Adaptability 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Was Was Was-3 Flooding design De/ Disassembly/ Adaptability 3 The de plan is reviewed and updated. Reviews should consider changes to technology and infrastructure planning 3 0 to 50% by value of components or pre-fabricated units used can be easily separated on disassembly/ de into material types suitable for recycling or reuse. For every increment of deconstructability up to 50% for Level 3, fractions of Levels may be achieved on a sliding scale. -3 scaled Lan Lan- 3 Opportunities to improve topsoil productivity of previously disturbed areas have been identified and incorporated Lan--3- into the project Lan Lan-3 Site assessment follows the recommended approach in s Schedule A 'Recommended general process for assessment of site contamination' of National < Select > 0% Lan Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 999 Lan Lan-3 Remediation options are identified and selected using a Contamination and remediation Lan-3-- sustainability hierarchy Lan Lan Contamination and remediation Lan-3 The requirements for Level are achieved Lan- Contamination Lan-3 3 and remediation Sustainability appraisal of remediation options is undertaken against the sustainability indicators in Table Lan-3-- Lan-3-- of 'A Framework for Assessing the Sustainability of Soil and Groundwater Remediation' Lan Lan-3 Contamination and remediation 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Lan-3-3- Lan Lan The effectiveness and durability of the remedial solution, and maintenance and monitoring, have been considered Lan-3-3- over the lifetime of the infrastructure and beyond Lan- Lan-4 4 Was Was- Predictions for waste quantities and types have been Waste management < Select > s 0% Was developed for and operation Was Was- Measures to minimise waste during and Waste management Was--- operation have been identified and implemented Was Was- Monitoring of all wastes is undertaken during Waste management Was---3 and operation Was Was- Waste Waste The requirements for Level are achieved Was--- management Was Was- Waste monitoring and management has been managed, reviewed or audited by a suitably qualified Was--- professional Was Was- Waste handling and disposal/recycling all the way to final destination has been audited at appropriate Was---3 intervals Was Was- All of the following targets for landfill diversion have s been achieved or bettered: < Select > 0% Was to <80% by volume of spoil Was Was- Diversion from landfill 5 to <50% by volume of inert and non-hazardous waste Was--- Diversion from landfill Was to <40% by volume of office waste Was Was- All of the following targets for landfill diversion have Was- been achieved or bettered: Was--- Diversion from 80 to 00% by volume of spoil landfill Diversion from landfill 50 to 90% by volume of inert and non-hazardous waste Was--- Was- Was-3 3 Ecological value Eco Eco- Ecological value The ecological value of the infrastructure site is maintained Eco Eco- Eco- 3 The ecological value of infrastructure site is enhanced Ecological value by 0 to 0%. Fractions of Levels may be achieved on a sliding scale up to 0% for Level scaled < Select > s 0% Was < Select > s 0% Eco Lan-4-- Was-3-3- Was-3-3- Was Eco--3- Ecology Well-being and Safety Hea Hea Hea- Eco Eco- habitat There is a low or moderate degree of existing connectivity identified and this is maintained Habitat connectivity Eco Eco- There is a low or moderate degree of existing habitat connectivity identified and this is enhanced OR There is a high degree of existing habitat connectivity Eco- Habitat identified and this is maintained connectivity Eco Eco- 3 There is a low or moderate degree of existing habitat connectivity identified and this is enhanced (no 3 offsetting) OR There is a high degree of existing habitat connectivity identified and this is maintained (no offsetting) Hea Hea- Measures to positively contribute to community health and wellbeing for one priority issues have been identified and implemented Hea Hea- Measures to positively contribute to community health and wellbeing for two priority issues have been identified and implemented Hea- Hea- Community health and wellbeing Monitoring of community health and wellbeing indicators related to the priority issues is undertaken at appropriate intervals during and operation of the asset. 3 Measures to positively contribute to community health and wellbeing for three priority issues have been identified and implemented < Select > s 0% Eco Eco--- Eco--3- s < Select > 0% Hea Hea--- Hea--- Hea--3-

141 Community health and well-being Crime prevention Heritage assessment and management Heritage assessment and management Stakeholder engagement strategy Stakeholder engagement strategy Level of engagement Level of engagement Level of engagement Effective communication Effective communication Effective communication Addressing community concerns Urban design Implementation Implementation Design Scorecard Community Health, Well Hea Hea- 3 Monitoring of community health and wellbeing indicators related to the priority issues is undertaken at appropriate intervals during and operation of the asset and demonstrates improvement of relevant indicators. Heritage Sta Sta- Negotiable issues are identified and the level of participation on these issues is at least 'involve' or higher Level of Sta- engagement on the IAP spectrum Sta Sta- Level of engagement Stakeholders are informed about non-negotiable issues Stakeholder Participation Sta Sta- 3 Negotiable issues are identified and the level of participation on these issues is at least 'collaborate' or 3 higher on the IAP spectrum Sta Sta- 3 Stakeholders are informed about non-negotiable issues Level of engagement Sta Sta-3 Sta Sta-3 This has been verified by: Sta Sta-3 Sta-3 The community has been provided with information that: - was provided in a timely manner - supported community participation - was meaningful and relevant - was accessible - internal management/reviews/audits OR - community feedback with 65-80% support The community has been provided with information that: - was provided in a timely manner - supported community participation - was meaningful and relevant - was accessible Urban and Landscape Design Her Her- Her Her- Sta Sta- stakeholder engagement strategy is Hea Hea- The likelihood of crime has been reduced through s implementing appropriate CPTED guidelines in design, < Select > 0% Hea and operation Hea- Crime Crime Hea- All tunnels or underpasses have end-to-end visibility Hea--- prevention Crime prevention Hea- The requirements for level are achieved Hea--- Hea Hea Hea Hea- Temporary diversions and lighting are Crime prevention Hea--- designed to meet CPTED guidance Community and Community heritage values have been identified through Heritage assessment and management < Select > s 0% Her consultation and integrated into studies Her Her- Measures to minimise adverse impacts to heritage during and operation have been identified Her--- and implemented Her Her- Heritage assessment and management The requirements for Level are achieved Her--- Her Her- Community and key stakeholders have participated in Heritage Heritage assessment and management Her--- Herassessment and the heritage studies Her Her- management Heritage values beyond those listed in government registers have been identified, considered and Her---3 addressed Her Her- Heritage has been interpreted to promote local heritage Heritage assessment and management Her---4 values Her Her- Heritage assessment and management 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Her--3- Her Her- 3 Opportunities have been identified and implemented to Heritage assessment and management Her--3- enhance heritage values. Monitoring of heritage is undertaken at appropriate intervals during and operation < Select > s 0% Her Monitoring and management of heritage Her Her- Monitoring and management of heritage The requirements for Level are achieved Her--- Her Her- Monitoring and Monitoring and modelling demonstrates maintenance of Her--- Monitoring and management of heritage management of heritage values Her Her- Monitoring heritage and management of heritage 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Her--3- Her Her- 3 Monitoring and modelling demonstrates enhancements Monitoring and management of heritage Her--3- to heritage values A comprehensive developed < Select > s 0% Sta Stakeholder engagement strategy Sta Sta- Stakeholder engagement strategy The requirements for Level are achieved Sta--- Sta Sta- The strategy is implemented and formal monitoring, Sta--- Stakeholder engagement strategy evaluation and corrective action is undertaken Sta Sta- The community is informed of the draft strategy and Stakeholder Sta- engagement provided an opportunity to give feedback. Community strategy feedback is documented and used to guide completion of the final strategy Sta---3 Stakeholder engagement strategy Sta Sta- 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Sta--3- Sta Sta- 3 Stakeholders, including the community, have input to the 3 strategy by way of a facilitated workshop(s) Sta--3- OR The strategy is independently reviewed. Sta Sta- Negotiable issues are identified and the level of s participation on these issues is at least 'consult' or higher < Select > 0% Sta on the IAP spectrum Sta Sta- Level of engagement Stakeholders are informed about non-negotiable issues Sta--- Sta Sta-3 This has been verified by: - independent reviews/audits OR - community feedback with >80% support Sta Sta-4 The community believe their concerns have been Addressing community concerns considered and addressed Sta Sta-4 This has been verified by: - internal management/reviews/audits Addressing OR Sta-4 community - community feedback with 65-80% support. Sta Sta-4 concerns The community believe their concerns have been Addressing community concerns considered and addressed Sta Sta-4 This has been verified by: - independent reviews/audits OR - community feedback with >80% support. Urb- Urban design 3 Urb Urb- An urban and landscape design plan is developed and implemented that includes the following:. Site analysis; Urb- Effective communication Urban design. Vision and objectives for the infrastructure; 3. Site planning; and 4. Strategies that respond to: a. the relevant People and Place principles outlined in the Australian Urban Design Protocol (AUDP) or b. other ISCA approved guidelines < Select > s 0% Sta < Select > s 0% Sta < Select > s 0% Urb Urb Urb- Urban design The requirements for Level are achieved Urb--- Urb Urb- The urban and landscape design plan has been Urban design Urb--- internally reviewed Urb Urb- Urban design 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Urb--3- Urb Urb- 3 The urban and landscape design plan has been Urban design Urb--3- independently reviewed Urb Urb- Urban and landscape designs are constructed and s ongoing management is incorporated into urban design < Select > 0% Urb and landscape management plans Urb- Urb- Implementation The requirements for Level are achieved Urb Urb--- Urb urban and landscape design plan and achieves a high Urb--- Urb- The infrastructure is managed in accordance with the degree of compliance. Hea--3- Sta--- Sta--- Sta--3- Sta--3- Sta-3-- Sta-4--

142 Innovation Design Scorecard Inn Innovation Inn- Inn- Innovation 0 An innovation submission can be awarded up to 0 points as follows: - Up to 0 initiatives can be submitted. - Each verified initiative will be awarded one point unless it is an Australian st (3 pts), World st (5 pts), or indicated otherwise elsewhere. - Each initiative must meet one or more of the following five criteria: innovative technology or process market transformation 3 improving on credit benchmarks 4 innovation challenge 5 global sustainability < Select > s 0% Inn

143 Design Credit Summary Infrastructure Sustainability Scorecard Credit Summary Project: Tunnels Location: Sydney Rating Type: Design Category Credit Materiality Score Score Possible Target Level Target Score Management Systems Man- Sustainability leadership and commitment 0.95 / Man- Risk and opportunity management 0.95 / 0.95 Man-3 Organisational structure, roles and responsibilities 0.95 / 0.95 Man-4 Inspection and auditing 0.95 / 0.95 Man-5 Reporting and review 0.95 / Man-6 Knowledge sharing.5 /3.43 Man-7 Decision-making 3.0 /3.03 Sub-total Procurement and Purchasing Pro- Commitment to sustainable procurement.9 / Pro- Identification of suppliers.9 / Pro-3 Supplier evaluation and contract award - /3 - Pro-4 Managing supplier performance - /3 - Sub-total Climate Change Adaptation Cli- Climate change risk assessment /3 3.8 Cli- Adaptation options /3 3.8 Sub-total Energy and Carbon Ene- Energy and carbon monitoring and reduction 3.89 / Ene- Use of renewable energy 3.5 /3 0.7 Sub-total Water Wat- Water use monitoring and reduction / Wat- Replace potable water /3.9 Sub-total Materials Mat- Materials footprint measurement and reduction / Mat- Environmentally labelled products and supply chains 3 - /3 - Sub-total Discharges to Air, Land & Water Dis- Receiving water quality /3.7 Dis- Noise /3 3.0 Dis-3 Vibration /3.7 Dis-4 Air quality.7 /3.5 Dis-5 Light pollution 0.95 / 0.95 Sub-total Land Lan- Previous land use.39 3/3.39 Lan- Conservation of on site resources 0.95 /3 0.3 Lan-3 Contamination and remediation.9 /3.7 Lan-4 Flooding design 3.5 /.07 Sub-total Waste Was- Waste management.9 /.9 Was- Diversion from landfill - /3 - Was-3 De/ Disassembly/ Adaptability - /3 - Sub-total.9.9 Ecology Eco- Ecological value 0 - /3 - Eco- Habitat connectivity 0 - /3 - Sub-total - - Community Health, Well-being and Safety Hea- Community health and well-being.39 /3.59 Hea- Crime prevention.39 /.39 Sub-total Heritage Her- Heritage assessment and management /3 3.8 Her- Monitoring and management of heritage 4 - /3 - Sub-total Stakeholder Participation Sta- Stakeholder engagement strategy 3.79 / Sta- Level of engagement 3.79 /3.9 Sta-3 Effective communication 3.79 / 0.89 Sta-4 Addressing community concerns / - Sub-total Urban and Landscape Design Urb- Urban design 3.8 3/3 3.8 Urb- Implementation - / - Sub-total Innovation Inn- Innovation 0.00 /0.00 Sub-total Grand-total Score Rating 67 EXCELLENT Infrastructure Sustainability Rating Tool (Version.0)

144 Design Charts Infrastructure Sustainability Scorecard Charts Project: Tunnels and Station Excavation Location: Sydney Rating Type: Design Category Scores Category Weight Target Assessed R Assessed R Verified R Points Man Pro Cli Ene Wat Mat Dis Lan Was Eco Hea Her Sta Urb Inn Credit Scores Points Available Target Assessed R Assessed R Verified R 4 0 Points Man-Man-Man-3Man-4Man-5Man-6Man-7 Pro- Pro- Pro-3 Pro-4 Cli- Cli- Ene- Ene- Wat- Wat- Mat- Mat- Dis- Dis- Dis-3 Dis-4 Dis-5 Lan- Lan- Lan-3 Lan-4 Was-Was-Was-3 Eco- Eco- Hea- Hea- Her- Her- Sta- Sta- Sta-3 Sta-4 Urb- Urb- Inn- Infrastructure Sustainability Rating Tool (Version.0) 9/0/0

145 As Built Project or Assest Input Infrastructure Sustainability Weightings Assessment Enter details Name of Infrastructure Project/Asset: Tunnels and Station Excavation Rating Type: As Built * Address of Infrastructure Project/Asset: Sydney Metro City & Southwest City/Suburb: Sydney Postcode: 000 State: NSW Registrant (organisation): Assessor (person): Proponent/Client: Designer: Main Constructor: Operator: Other key consultants: Sydney Metro Suzanna Remmerswaal Sydney Metro PB AECOM Joint Venture TBC TBC TBC Local Planning Authority: Description of project/asset: City of Sydney Tunnels and Station Excavation Construction/Maintenance Methodology: D&C Project start date: 08 Design completion date: 00 Construction practical completion date: 0 Total delivery cost (design and ): 5,000,000,000 Annual operating : Materiality Assessment Date: 6/6/6 Team involved in Materiality Assessment: (Name, role, stakeholders represented) Suzanna Remmerswaal David Fox Jo Haggerty Stuart Hodgson

146 As Built Weighting Assessment Version:. Infrastructure Sustainability Weightings Rating type: As Built Release date: 06/04/06 Assessment All Q's answered? Yes Original release date: 06/04/06 No. Cat Credit Credit Name Credit and Category Aims Question Question Question 3 Mat Score Default Alt Mat Score Justification Final Mat Score Points Category / Credits Final Points Category / Credits Evidence Required Evidence Supplied Man Man- Sustainability leadership and To integrate sustainability into NA NA NA No commitment management systems and approach. Man- Risk and opportunity management This has been assigned a default Man-3 Organisational structure, roles materiality score of and responsibilities Man-4 Inspection and auditing Man-5 Reporting and review Man-6 Knowledge sharing.5.90 Man-7 Decision-making To assess the requirements for No NA NA incorporating sustainability aspects into decision making. Pro Pro- Commitment to sustainable To integrate sustainability into NA NA NA No procurement procurement systems. Pro- Identification of suppliers.5.06 Pro-3 Supplier evaluation and contract This has been assigned a default.5.06 award materiality score of. Pro-4 Managing supplier performance Cli Cli- Climate change risk assessment To assess climate change risks and Long (>50 Yes NA Design life requirement for climate change years) Location map showing proximity to Cli- Adaptation options adaptation measures natural hazards 4 Ene Ene- Energy and carbon monitoring and reduction To understand the potential for minimising energy use from non Rail (electric) Yes NA Description of project/asset Construction/maintenance Ene- Renewable energy renewable sources and GHG emissions methodology across the infrastructure lifecycle. 5 Wat Wat- Water use monitoring and To understand the potential for No Yes Yes 3 Note for TSE only reduction minimising water use from potable In terms of Wat- Replace potable water sources across the infrastructure operation of methodology 6 Mat Mat- Materials footprint measurement and reduction To identify the lifecycle environmental impacts of materials throughout the High (>50%) Low (<0%) NA infrastructure lifecycle. Mat- Environmentally labelled products and supply chains Description of project/asset Construction/maintenance Construction/maintenance methodology 7 Dis Dis- Receiving Water Quality To identify impacts on local receiving water quality across project/asset's lifecycle. 8 Dis- Noise To identify noise impacts across project/asset's lifecycle. 9 Dis-3 Vibration To identify vibration impacts across project/asset's lifecycle. Yes Yes Yes 3 Confirm receiving water bodies Rail (electric) Environmental licence Risk register Location map showing receiving waters Yes Adjacent Construction/maintenance methodology Location map showing noise receivers Yes Adjacent NA Construction/maintenance methodology Location map showing vibration receivers

147 As Built Weighting Assessment 0 Dis-4 Air Quality To identify air quality impacts across project/asset's lifecycle. Rail (electric) Yes Yes (urban).38.0 Location map showing surrounding population density Dis-5 Light Pollution To identify impacts across project/asset's lifecycle. Rail (electric) Yes Adjacent 3 TSE may involve night works, but not likely to be above ground Construction/maintenance methodology Location map showing light receivers Lan Lan- Previous Land Use To identify land that has previously been developed and where it can be reused. This has been assigned a default materiality score of. NA NA NA No 3 Lan- Conservation of on-site resources To identify where soil resources can be conserved. Yes NA NA Construction/maintenance methodology 4 Lan-3 Contamination and remediation To assess contamination risks and Present NA NA Contamination at Contamination study perform sustainable remediation. and low Waterloo most significant 5 Lan-4 Flooding To identify risks from flooding. Yes Yes NA Flood maps Location map showing potential flood impacts 6 Was Was- Waste management To identify the potential for sustainable waste management plans and practices. High (>50%) Low (<0%) Yes Construction/maintenance methodology Was- Diversion from landfill No 7 Was-3 De/ Disassembly/ To understand the potential for design Long (>50 High No Scope out? De statement Adaptability and planning for de, disassembly and adaptability of infrastructure in the future. years) (>50%) 8 Eco Eco- Ecoloigcal value To identify impacts to local ecological Low Distant NA Map showing footprint Eco- Habitat connectivity value and habitat connectivity. (<0%) (>00m) and ecological habitat 9 Hea Hea- Community health and wellbeing To identify the potential for making a positive contribution to community health and wellbeing. NA NA NA No This has been assigned a default materiality score of. 0 Hea- Crime prevention To assess the impact to design and Yes NA NA.50. practice in response to the likelihood of crime. Her Her- Heritage assessment and To assess the management and Yes (or Yes NA 4 Heritage items Location map showing heritage management monitoring of impacts on heritage. unknown) above tunnelling including value Her- Monitoring and management of works heritage Sta Sta- Stakeholder engagement To assess the level of risk atributed to Yes NA NA Stakeholder analysis strategy the engagement, and consideration of Sta- Level of engagement stakeholders and their concerns, in the Sta-3 Effective communication context of the project/asset operation Sta-4 Addressing community concerns and maintenance Urb Urb- Urban design To identify the potential for adoption of Rail Yes NA 3 Very little Description of project/asset Urb- Implementation best practice urban design principles. (electric) (urban) permanent works NA Inn Inn- Innovation Bonus credit This has been assigned a default materiality score of. NA NA NA No

148 As Built Weightings Chart Infrastructure Sustainability Weightings Assessment Charts Category Weightings Default Final Man Pro Cli Ene Wat Mat Dis Lan Was Eco Hea Her Sta Urb Inn 0.00 Credit Weightings Default Final 0 8 Points Category Weightings - Default Category Weightings - Final 5% 5% 9% 9% 5% 5% 6% 4% 9% 8% 4% 7% 5% 5% 0% 6% 6% 9% 6% 6% 9% 8% 4% 0% 4% 6% % 8% 8% % Man Pro Cli Ene Wat Mat Dis Lan Was Eco Hea Her Sta Urb Inn Man Pro Cli Ene Wat Mat Dis Lan Was Eco Hea Her Sta Urb Inn Infrastructure Sustainability Rating Tool (Version.0) 9/0/0

149 Sustainability leadership and commitment Organisational structure, roles and responsibilities Organisational structure, roles and responsibilities Inspection and auditing Inspection and auditing Inspection and auditing Inspection and auditing Inspection and auditing Inspection and auditing Reporting and review Knowledge sharing Knowledge sharing Decision-making Decision-making Decision-making Decision-making Decision-making As Built Scorecard Assessor progress tracking Assessment Round One Verification Round One Assessment Round Two Verification Round Two Cost - Benefit Tracking Infrastructure Sustainability Scorecard Level Materiality Score Points per level Score possible Target credit? Target level Target score Owner (name/team) Status % Complete Categ ory Credit Title Criteria Man Man- There are commitments to mitigating negative Sustainability leadership and commitment Completed s Man % Man--- environmental, social and economic impacts Man Man- These commitments are embedded into sustainability ## Sustainability leadership and commitment Man--- objectives and/or targets Man Man- Sustainability leadership and commitment The requirements for Level are achieved Man--- Sustainability Man- Man Man- leadership and The sustainability objectives and/or targets are reflected 8 0 Sustainability leadership and Man--- commitment in project contracts Sustainability leadership and commitment Man Man- 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Man--3-0 Man Man- 3 The sustainability commitments go beyond mitigating 0 3 negative impacts to restorative actions (ie net positive Man--3- benefits for society and the environment) Sustainability leadership and commitment Man Man- 3 The sustainability commitments are publicly stated Man Man Man- Risk and opportunity management Environmental, social and economic risks are assessed < Select > s 0 0% Man--- Risk and opportunity management Man Man- Risk and The risk assessment is updated at least annually Man--- Man- Man Man- opportunity Risk and opportunity The requirements for Level are achieved Man--- management Man Man- Environmental, social and economic opportunities are 0 Risk and opportunity management Man--- also assessed Man Man-3 A member(s) of the senior management team has Organisational structure, roles and responsibilities < Select > s 0 0% Man-3-- central responsibility for managing sustainability Man Man-3 A principal participant in the team is an IS Accredited 0 Organisational Professional whose role is to provide sustainability Man-3-- Man Man An independent sustainability professional is engaged to Man-3-- monitor and review sustainability performance Man- structure, roles advice Man-3 3 and Organisational structure, roles and responsibilities The requirements for Level are achieved Man-3-- Man-3 Actions General notes Level assessed Score assessed Rulings used Evidence Notes on evidence Level verified Verification meeting Level verified Score verified Level assessed Score assessed Rulings used Evidence Notes on evidence Case manager comments Verifier comments Level verified Verifier comments Level verified Verification meeting Level verified Score verified Initiative name Cost description Cost ($) Benefit description Benefit ($) Man Man-4 Internal environmental inspections of site management are undertaken at least weekly during s < Select > 0% Man Man Man Man Man-4 Man-4 Man- Man-4 4 Inspection and auditing Environmental audits of the management system are conducted. At least one external review or audit is conducted during design. During at least four environmental audits are conducted per year where at least one is external. Internal sustainability inspections of site management are undertaken at least weekly during Man-4-- Man-4--3 Man-4-- Man Man Management Systems Man-4 Man-4 Sustainability audits of the management system are conducted. At least one external review or audit is conducted during design. During at least four sustainability audits are conducted per year where at least one is external. Reporting and review to senior management Man Man-5 The sustainability report includes sustainability objectives and/or targets and identifies areas for improvement Reporting and review annually by senior management Man Man-5 Man- Reporting and review and The requirements for Level are achieved Man 5 Man-5 review Sustainability performance is reported at least quarterly Reporting and review to senior management Man Man-5 Reporting and review 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Man Man-5 Reporting and review 3 Sustainability performance is reported annually publicly < Select > s 0% Man Reporting and review Man participation Sustainability knowledge is shared within the project < Select > s 0% Man Knowledge sharing Man-4-- Man-4--3 Man-5-- Man-5--3 Man-5-- Man-5-- Man-5-3- Man-5-3- Man Man-6 Knowledge sharing The requirements for Level are achieved Man-6-- Man Man Man-6 Sustainability knowledge is shared beyond project boundaries to parent organisations and/or other key Man-6-- stakeholders. Man- Knowledge Man-6 Sustainability knowledge is shared from outside the Knowledge 6 sharing Man-6--3 project/asset onto the project. Man Man-6 Knowledge sharing 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Man-6-3- Man Man-6 3 Sustainability knowledge is shared beyond project and Man-6-3- Knowledge sharing 3 key stakeholder boundaries to the wider industry. Man Man-6 3 Sustainability knowledge sharing includes 'lessons learnt (that had negative consequences) as well as Man 'good practices'. Man Man-7 For significant issues, decision making is characterised s by: Considering options including business as usual and < Select > 0% Man proven approaches taken in comparable situations Man Man-7 And evaluating options primarily on the basis of financial aspects but considering environmental, social and Man-7-- economic aspects qualitatively through risk assessment, constraint analysis or other non-scored means Decision-making of infrastructure asset Man Man-7 For significant issues, decision making is characterised by: Considering options including business as usual and Decision-making proven approaches taken in comparable situations Man Man-7 And evaluating options by considering environmental, 7 social and economic aspects through the use of multicriteria analysis or other scored means; Man Man-7 And evaluating options based on the forecast useful life Decision-making of infrastructure asset Man Man-7 3 For significant issues, decision making is characterised by: Considering options including business as usual, nonasset, technical limits and an option that specifically aim to address sustainability aspects; Man-7--3 Man-7-- Man-7-- Man-7--3 Man-7-3-

150 Decision-making Decision-making Commitment to sustainable procurement Identification of suppliers Supplier evaluation and contract award Managing supplier performance Climate change risk assessment Climate change risk assessment Climate change risk assessment Climate change risk assessment Adaptation options Adaptation options Adaptation options Adaptation options Energy and carbon monitoring and reduction Energy and carbon monitoring and reduction Use of renewable energy Water use monitoring and reduction Replace potable water As Built Scorecard Procurement and Purchasing Climate Change Adapation Energy and Carbon -3 scaled Water Pro Pro- aspects Pro Pro- Pro Man Man-7 And evaluating options by considering environmental, 3 social and economic aspects through incorporating their Man-7-3- value into cost-benefit analysis or other quantified means; Man Man-7 3 And evaluating options based on the forecast useful life of infrastructure asset and using social rates of return for Man discounting There is a commitment to require environmental to be considered in the procurement process < Select > s 0% Pro Commitment to sustainable procurement There is a commitment to require sustainability aspects Pro--- Commitment to sustainable procurement to be considered in the procurement process Commitment to Commitment to procurement Pro- 3 Requirements of Level are achieved Pro--3- sustainable Pro- procurement 3 The sustainable procurement commitments are publicly Pro--3- Pro Commitment to sustainable procurement 3 stated Pro Pro- 3 Sustainable procurement commitments are embedded Pro--3-3 into sustainability objectives and/or targets Pro Pro- of their Pro Pro Pro-3 aspects Pro Pro Pro-4 Potential suppliers requested to provide details environmental policy and its implementation < Select > s 0% Pro Identification of suppliers Pro- Potential suppliers requested to provide details of their Identification of suppliers Pro--- Pro- sustainability policy and its implementation Identification of Identification of Pro- 3 Requirements for Level are achieved Pro--3- suppliers Pro Pro Pro- 3 Engagement with potential suppliers is undertaken to 3 explain sustainability requirements and expectations, Pro--3- and to help stimulate innovation in relation to sustainability through the procurement process. Supplier evaluation considers environmenta through use of qualitative criteria < Select > s 0% Pro Supplier evaluation and contract award Pro Pro-3 Supplier evaluation considers sustainability aspects Supplier evaluation and contract award Pro-3-- through use of qualitative criteria. Supplier Pro-3 Supplier contracts incorporate sustainability objectives Supplier evaluation and contract award and Pro contract award and/or targets Pro Pro-3 Supplier evaluation and contract award 3 Requirements for Level are achieved Pro-3-3- Pro Pro-3 3 Supplier evaluation considers sustainability aspects through use of multi-criteria analysis or other scored Pro-3-3- means. Suppliers have environmental objectives and/or targets < Select > s 0% Pro Managing supplier performance Pro Pro-4 Supplier environmental performance is monitored for the duration of contracts, against the objectives and/or Pro-4-- targets. Managing supplier performance Pro Pro-4 Requirements for Level are achieved Pro-4-- Managing Pro Pro-4 Managing supplier performance Suppliers have sustainability objectives and/or targets. Pro performance Pro Pro-4 Poor sustainability performance or non-compliance is Managing supplier performance Pro-4--3 actively managed Managing supplier performance Pro Pro-4 3 Requirements for Level are achieved Pro-4-3- Pro Pro-4 Contract managers work with suppliers to identify any Managing supplier performance 3 Pro-4-3- emerging or new sustainability opportunities Managing supplier performance Pro Pro-4 3 Success is encouraged and rewarded Pro Cli Cli- A readily available climate change projection is identified s and adopted for the asset region over the forecast useful < Select > 0% Cli life of the asset Cli Cli- Direct climate change risks to the asset over the forecast Climate change risk assessment Cli--- useful life are identified and assessed Climate change risk assessment Cli Cli- The requirements of Level are achieved Cli--- Cli Cli- A number of readily available climate change projections are identified and adopted for the asset Cli--- region over the forecast useful life of the asset Cli Cli- Climate change The climate change risk assessment also considered Cli- Climate change risk Cli---3 risk assessment indirect climate change risks to the asset Cli Cli- A multi-disciplinary team participated in identifying Climate change risk assessment Cli---4 climate change risks and issues Climate change risk assessment Cli Cli- 3 The requirements of Level are achieved Cli--3- Cli Cli- 3 Modelling is undertaken to characterise the likely impacts of the projected climate change for all High and Cli--3-3 Extreme priority climate change risks Cli Cli- 3 A comprehensive set of affected external stakeholders participated in identifying climate change risks and Cli--3-3 issues Cli Cli- Adaptation options to treat all extreme and high priority s climate change risks are identified, assessed and On track 0% Cli appropriate measures implemented Cli Cli- After treatment there are no extreme priority residual Adaptation options Cli--- climate change risks Cli Cli- Adaptation options The requirements of Level are achieved Cli--- Cli Cli- Adaptation options to treat 5-50% of all medium priority climate change risks are identified, assessed and Cli--- Adaptation Cli- options appropriate measures implemented Adaptation options Cli Cli- 3 The requirements of Level are achieved Cli--3- Cli Cli- 3 The optimal scale and timing of options is addressed (which may be triggered by when a specific climate Cli--3- threshold is likely to be achieved) Cli Cli- 3 Adaptation options to treat at least 50% of all medium priority climate change risks are identified, assessed and appropriate measures implemented Cli Cli- 3 After treatment there are no high priority residual climate Adaptation options Cli--3-4 change risks Ene Ene- Monitoring and modelling of energy use and GHG s emissions, and actions taken to reduce them is < Select > 0% Ene undertaken, covering at least Scope, Scope and Energy and land clearing across the infrastructure lifecycle Ene Ene- carbon 3 Energy and carbon and reduction The requirements for Level are achieved Ene--3- monitoring and Ene Ene- reduction 3 Monitoring and modelling demonstrates a reduction in GHG emissions compared to a base case footprint. Ene--3- For every reduction up to 30% for Level 3, fractions of Levels may be achieved on a sliding scale. achieved on a sliding scale. Wat Wat- Water use monitoring and reduction Monitoring and modelling of water use, is undertaken < Select > s 0% Wat Ene Ene- Opportunities for use of renewable energy are fully Use of renewable energy < Select > s 0% Ene investigated Use of Use of energy Ene Ene- 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Ene--3- renewable Ene Ene- energy 3 For every substitution of energy from renewable sources 3 up to 40% for Level 3, fractions of Levels may be Ene--3- Wat Wat Water use monitoring and reduction Wat- Water use 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Wat- Wat- monitoring and 3 Monitoring and modelling demonstrates a reduction in reduction water use compared to a base case footprint. Wat--3- Wat--3- For every reduction up to 0% for Level 3, fractions of Levels may be achieved on a sliding scale. Wat Wat- 3 Monitoring and modelling demonstrates that some s Replace potable proportion of total water use is from non-potable sources (substituting for potable) < Select > Wat- water -3-3 scaled 0-3 scaled Fractions of Levels may be achieved on a sliding scale up to 00% for Level 3. 0% Wat

151 Materials footprint measurement and reduction Materials footprint measurement and reduction Receiving water quality Receiving water quality Receiving water quality Receiving water quality Receiving water quality Noise Noise Noise Noise Noise Vibration Vibration Vibration Vibration Vibration Air quality Air quality Air quality Light pollution Light pollution Previous land use Conservation of on site resources As Built Scorecard Materials Discharges to Air, Land and Water Dis Dis-3 Dis Measures to mitigate vibration during and 3 operation have been identified and implemented < Select > s 0% Dis Vibration Dis Dis-3 Monitoring of vibration is undertaken at appropriate intervals and in response to complaints during Dis-3-- and operation Dis Dis-3 Vibration The requirements for Level are achieved Dis-3-- Dis Dis-3 For, modelling and monitoring demonstrates no exceedences of vibration goals for Dis-3-- structural damage to buildings and structures. Dis Dis-3 Vibration For operation, modelling and monitoring demonstrates no recurring or major exceedences of vibration goals for Dis-3--3 human comfort criteria Dis Dis-3 No physical damage has been caused to any buildings or structures by vibration caused by or Dis-3--4 operation Dis Dis-3 Vibration 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Dis-3-3- Dis Dis-3 3 For operation, modelling and monitoring demonstrates no exceedences of vibration goals for human comfort Dis-3-3- criteria Dis Dis-4 Measures to minimise adverse impacts to local air s quality during and operation have been < Select > 0% Dis identified and implemented Dis Dis-4 Monitoring of air emissions and/or air quality is undertaken at appropriate intervals and in response to Dis-4-- complaints during and operation Dis-4 Air quality Dis-4 Air quality The requirements for Level are achieved Dis-4-- Dis Dis-4 Monitoring and modelling demonstrates no recurring or major exceedences of air emission or air quality goals Dis Dis-4 Air quality 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Dis-4-3- Dis Dis-4 3 Monitoring and modelling demonstrates no exceedences Air quality Dis-4-3- of air emission or air quality goals Measures to prevent light spill during have been identified and implemented < Select > s 0% Dis Light pollution Dis Dis-5 The lighting design for operation prevents horizontal light spill through compliance with the numerical limits for Dis-5-- obtrusive light in Tables. and. of AS48. Dis Lan Dis-5 Lan- Mat Mat- Mat value have an ISCA Mat Dis Dis- has an ISCA approved Mat- have an ISCA Mat Mat- Monitoring and modelling of materials lifecycle impacts s is undertaken using the Materials Calculator (or other suitable Lifecycle Assessment technique) across the < Select > 0% Mat Materials infrastructure lifecycle Mat Mat- Materials footprint measurement and reduction 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Mat--3- Mat Mat- measurement 3 Monitoring and modelling demonstrates a reduction in and reduction materials lifecycle impacts compared to a base case footprint. Mat--3- For every reduction up to 30% for Level 3, fractions of Levels may be achieved on a sliding scale. Environmentally labelled products and supply chains One material/product Environmentally environmental label < Select > s 0% Mat Mat- labelled 3-9% of materials/products by Environmentally labelled supply chains products and approved environmental label. Mat--- Environmentally labelled products and supply chains approved environmental label. supply chains 3 >9% of materials/products by value Mat--3- Dis Dis- Measures to minimise adverse impacts to receiving s water environmental values during and < Select > 0% Dis operation have been identified and implemented. Dis Dis- Monitoring of water discharges and receiving waters is undertaken at appropriate intervals and at times of Dis--- discharge during and operation Dis Dis- Receiving water quality The requirements for Level are achieved Dis--- Dis Dis- Monitoring and modelling of water discharges and Dis- receiving waters demonstrates no adverse impact on Dis--- Receiving water quality local receiving water environmental values. Dis Dis- The infrastructure does not increase peak stormwater flows for rainfall events of up to a.5 year ARI event Dis---3 discharge Dis Dis- Receiving water quality 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Dis--3- Dis Dis- 3 Opportunities to improve local receiving water quality 3 and/or provide environmental flows have been identified Dis--3- and implemented Dis Dis- 3 Monitoring and modelling demonstrates improvement of Receiving water quality Dis--3-3 local receiving water environmental values Measures to mitigate noise during and 4 operation have been identified and implemented < Select > s 0% Dis Noise Dis Dis- Monitoring of noise is undertaken at appropriate intervals and in response to complaints during and Dis--- operation Dis Dis- Noise The requirements for Level are achieved Dis--- Dis Dis- For, modelling and monitoring demonstrates no recurring or major divergences from Dis--- the noise management process in ISCA approved noise guidelines Dis Dis- Noise For operation, modelling and monitoring and monitoring demonstrates no recurring or major exeedences of Dis---3 noise goals Dis Dis- Noise 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Dis--3- Dis Dis- 3 For, modelling and monitoring demonstrates no divergence from the noise Dis--3-3 management process in ISCA approved noise guidelines Dis Dis- 3 For operation, modelling and monitoring and monitoring Dis--3-3 demonstrates no exeedences of noise goals. Lan- Light pollution Previous land use -3 scaled Scaled The lighting design for operation prevents upward light spill by ensuring that, relative to its particular mounting orientation, 95% (by number) of external public lighting luminaires within the project boundary have an Upward Light Ratio less than 5% (for roads and public spaces this must be less than 3% in accordance with AS58). 0 to >75% of the land used for the project is previously disturbed. Fractions of Levels may be achieved on a sliding scale up to >75% use of previously disturbed land for Level < Select > s 0% Lan Lan Lan- Conservation of topsoils and subsoil has been Conservation of on site resources < Select > s 0% Lan considered Conservation of on site resources Lan Lan- The requirements for Level are achieved Lan--- Lan Lan- All subsoil and topsoil impacted by the project is separated and protected from degradation, erosion or Lan--- Conservation of Lan- mixing with fill or waste on site Lan Lan- 95% of all topsoil (by volume) retains its productivity and Conservation resources of on site Lan---3 is beneficially re-used on or nearby to the project Conservation of on site resources Lan Lan- 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Lan--3- Dis-4-- Dis-5--3

152 Conservation of on site resources Contamination and remediation Contamination and remediation Contamination and remediation Flooding design Flooding design Waste management Waste management Diversion from landfill Diversion from landfill Diversion from landfill De/ Disassembly/ Adaptability De/ Disassembly/ Adaptability Ecological value Habitat connectivity Habitat connectivity Community health and well-being Community health and well-being Community health and well-being Community health and well-being As Built Scorecard Land Lan Lan Lan-4 The run-off, flood risk, and potential increased flood risk elsewhere as a result of the project have all been assessed over their expected working life, in line with the requirements of 'Flood plain management in Australia: best practice principles and guidelines' and appropriate flood resilience measures have been included in the design so that there is no increase in flood risk The run-off, flood risk, and potential increased flood risk elsewhere as a result of the project have all been assessed over their expected working life, in line with the requirements of 'Flood plain management in Australia: best practice principles and guidelines' and appropriate flood resilience measures have been included in the design so that there is a significant decrease in flood risk < Select > s 0% Lan Waste Was Was- Diversion from landfill 40 to 60% by volume of office waste Was---3 Was Was- 3 All of the following targets for landfill diversion have been achieved or bettered: Was--3-00% by volume of spoil Was Was- Diversion from landfill 3 >90% by volume of inert and non-hazardous waste Was--3- Was Was- Diversion from landfill 3 >60% by volume of office waste material Was--3-3 Was Was-3 De/ Disassembly/ Adaptability A de plan is developed based on good practice Was Was-3 De/ Disassembly/ Adaptability 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Was Was Was-3 Flooding design De/ Disassembly/ Adaptability 3 The de plan is reviewed and updated. Reviews should consider changes to technology and infrastructure planning 3 0 to 50% by value of components or pre-fabricated units used can be easily separated on disassembly/ de into material types suitable for recycling or reuse. For every increment of deconstructability up to 50% for Level 3, fractions of Levels may be achieved on a sliding scale. -3 scaled Lan Lan- 3 Opportunities to improve topsoil productivity of previously disturbed areas have been identified and incorporated Lan--3- into the project Lan Lan-3 Site assessment follows the recommended approach in s Schedule A 'Recommended general process for assessment of site contamination' of National < Select > 0% Lan Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 999 Lan Lan-3 Remediation options are identified and selected using a Contamination and remediation Lan-3-- sustainability hierarchy Lan Lan Contamination and remediation Lan-3 The requirements for Level are achieved Lan- Contamination Lan-3 3 and remediation Sustainability appraisal of remediation options is undertaken against the sustainability indicators in Table Lan-3-- Lan-3-- of 'A Framework for Assessing the Sustainability of Soil and Groundwater Remediation' Lan Lan-3 Contamination and remediation 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Lan-3-3- Lan Lan The effectiveness and durability of the remedial solution, and maintenance and monitoring, have been considered Lan-3-3- over the lifetime of the infrastructure and beyond Lan- Lan-4 4 Was Was- Predictions for waste quantities and types have been Waste management < Select > s 0% Was developed for and operation Was Was- Measures to minimise waste during and Waste management Was--- operation have been identified and implemented Was Was- Monitoring of all wastes is undertaken during Waste management Was---3 and operation Was Was- Waste Waste The requirements for Level are achieved Was--- management Was Was- Waste monitoring and management has been managed, reviewed or audited by a suitably qualified Was--- professional Was Was- Waste handling and disposal/recycling all the way to final destination has been audited at appropriate Was---3 intervals Was Was- All of the following targets for landfill diversion have s been achieved or bettered: < Select > 0% Was to <80% by volume of spoil Was Was- Diversion from landfill 5 to <50% by volume of inert and non-hazardous waste Was--- Diversion from landfill Was to <40% by volume of office waste Was Was- All of the following targets for landfill diversion have Was- been achieved or bettered: Was--- Diversion from 80 to 00% by volume of spoil landfill Diversion from landfill 50 to 90% by volume of inert and non-hazardous waste Was--- Was- Was-3 3 Ecological value Eco Eco- Ecological value The ecological value of the infrastructure site is maintained Eco Eco- Eco- 3 The ecological value of infrastructure site is enhanced Ecological value by 0 to 0%. Fractions of Levels may be achieved on a sliding scale up to 0% for Level scaled < Select > s 0% Was < Select > s 0% Eco Lan-4-- Was-3-3- Was-3-3- Was Eco--3- Ecology Well-being and Safety Hea Hea Hea- Eco Eco- habitat There is a low or moderate degree of existing connectivity identified and this is maintained Habitat connectivity Eco Eco- There is a low or moderate degree of existing habitat connectivity identified and this is enhanced OR There is a high degree of existing habitat connectivity Eco- Habitat identified and this is maintained connectivity Eco Eco- 3 There is a low or moderate degree of existing habitat connectivity identified and this is enhanced (no 3 offsetting) OR There is a high degree of existing habitat connectivity identified and this is maintained (no offsetting) Hea Hea- Measures to positively contribute to community health and wellbeing for one priority issues have been identified and implemented Hea Hea- Measures to positively contribute to community health and wellbeing for two priority issues have been identified and implemented Hea- Hea- Community health and wellbeing Monitoring of community health and wellbeing indicators related to the priority issues is undertaken at appropriate intervals during and operation of the asset. 3 Measures to positively contribute to community health and wellbeing for three priority issues have been identified and implemented < Select > s 0% Eco Eco--- Eco--3- s < Select > 0% Hea Hea--- Hea--- Hea--3-

153 Community health and well-being Crime prevention Heritage assessment and management Heritage assessment and management Stakeholder engagement strategy Stakeholder engagement strategy Level of engagement Level of engagement Level of engagement Effective communication Effective communication Effective communication Addressing community concerns Urban design Implementation Implementation As Built Scorecard Community Health, Well Hea Hea- 3 Monitoring of community health and wellbeing indicators related to the priority issues is undertaken at appropriate intervals during and operation of the asset and demonstrates improvement of relevant indicators. Heritage Sta Sta- Negotiable issues are identified and the level of participation on these issues is at least 'involve' or higher Level of Sta- engagement on the IAP spectrum Sta Sta- Level of engagement Stakeholders are informed about non-negotiable issues Stakeholder Participation Sta Sta- 3 Negotiable issues are identified and the level of participation on these issues is at least 'collaborate' or 3 higher on the IAP spectrum Sta Sta- 3 Stakeholders are informed about non-negotiable issues Level of engagement Sta Sta-3 Sta Sta-3 This has been verified by: Sta Sta-3 Sta-3 The community has been provided with information that: - was provided in a timely manner - supported community participation - was meaningful and relevant - was accessible - internal management/reviews/audits OR - community feedback with 65-80% support The community has been provided with information that: - was provided in a timely manner - supported community participation - was meaningful and relevant - was accessible Urban and Landscape Design Her Her- Her Her- Sta Sta- stakeholder engagement strategy is Hea Hea- The likelihood of crime has been reduced through s implementing appropriate CPTED guidelines in design,.06.. < Select > 0% Hea and operation Hea- Crime Crime Hea- All tunnels or underpasses have end-to-end visibility Hea--- prevention Crime prevention Hea- The requirements for level are achieved Hea--- Hea Hea Hea Hea- Temporary diversions and lighting are Crime prevention Hea--- designed to meet CPTED guidance Community and Community heritage values have been identified through Heritage assessment and management < Select > s 0% Her consultation and integrated into studies Her Her- Measures to minimise adverse impacts to heritage during and operation have been identified Her--- and implemented Her Her- Heritage assessment and management The requirements for Level are achieved Her--- Her Her- Community and key stakeholders have participated in Heritage Heritage assessment and management Her--- Herassessment and the heritage studies Her Her- management Heritage values beyond those listed in government registers have been identified, considered and Her---3 addressed Her Her- Heritage has been interpreted to promote local heritage Heritage assessment and management Her---4 values Her Her- Heritage assessment and management 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Her--3- Her Her- 3 Opportunities have been identified and implemented to Heritage assessment and management Her--3- enhance heritage values. Monitoring of heritage is undertaken at appropriate intervals during and operation < Select > s 0% Her Monitoring and management of heritage Her Her- Monitoring and management of heritage The requirements for Level are achieved Her--- Her Her- Monitoring and Monitoring and modelling demonstrates maintenance of Her--- Monitoring and management of heritage management of heritage values Her Her- Monitoring heritage and management of heritage 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Her--3- Her Her- 3 Monitoring and modelling demonstrates enhancements Monitoring and management of heritage Her--3- to heritage values A comprehensive developed < Select > s 0% Sta Stakeholder engagement strategy Sta Sta- Stakeholder engagement strategy The requirements for Level are achieved Sta--- Sta Sta- The strategy is implemented and formal monitoring, Sta--- Stakeholder engagement strategy evaluation and corrective action is undertaken Sta Sta- The community is informed of the draft strategy and Stakeholder Sta- engagement provided an opportunity to give feedback. Community strategy feedback is documented and used to guide completion of the final strategy Sta---3 Stakeholder engagement strategy Sta Sta- 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Sta--3- Sta Sta- 3 Stakeholders, including the community, have input to the 3 strategy by way of a facilitated workshop(s) Sta--3- OR The strategy is independently reviewed. Sta Sta- Negotiable issues are identified and the level of s participation on these issues is at least 'consult' or higher < Select > 0% Sta on the IAP spectrum Sta Sta- Level of engagement Stakeholders are informed about non-negotiable issues Sta--- Sta Sta-3 This has been verified by: - independent reviews/audits OR - community feedback with >80% support Sta Sta-4 The community believe their concerns have been Addressing community concerns considered and addressed Sta Sta-4 This has been verified by: - internal management/reviews/audits Addressing OR Sta-4 community - community feedback with 65-80% support. Sta Sta-4 concerns The community believe their concerns have been Addressing community concerns considered and addressed Sta Sta-4 This has been verified by: - independent reviews/audits OR - community feedback with >80% support. Urb- Urban design 3 Urb Urb- An urban and landscape design plan is developed and implemented that includes the following:. Site analysis; Urb- Effective communication Urban design. Vision and objectives for the infrastructure; 3. Site planning; and 4. Strategies that respond to: a. the relevant People and Place principles outlined in the Australian Urban Design Protocol (AUDP) or b. other ISCA approved guidelines < Select > s 0% Sta < Select > s 0% Sta < Select > s 0% Urb Urb Urb- Urban design The requirements for Level are achieved Urb--- Urb Urb- The urban and landscape design plan has been Urban design Urb--- internally reviewed Urb Urb- Urban design 3 The requirements for Level are achieved Urb--3- Urb Urb- 3 The urban and landscape design plan has been Urban design Urb--3- independently reviewed Urb Urb- Urban and landscape designs are constructed and s ongoing management is incorporated into urban design < Select > 0% Urb and landscape management plans Urb- Urb- Implementation The requirements for Level are achieved Urb Urb--- Urb urban and landscape design plan and achieves a high Urb--- Urb- The infrastructure is managed in accordance with the degree of compliance. Hea--3- Sta--- Sta--- Sta--3- Sta--3- Sta-3-- Sta-4--

154 Innovation As Built Scorecard Inn Innovation Inn- Inn- Innovation 0 An innovation submission can be awarded up to 0 points as follows: - Up to 0 initiatives can be submitted. - Each verified initiative will be awarded one point unless it is an Australian st (3 pts), World st (5 pts), or indicated otherwise elsewhere. - Each initiative must meet one or more of the following five criteria: innovative technology or process market transformation 3 improving on credit benchmarks 4 innovation challenge 5 global sustainability < Select > s 0% Inn

155 As Built Credit Summary Infrastructure Sustainability Scorecard Credit Summary Project: Tunnels Location: Sydney Rating Type: As Built Category Credit Materiality Score Score Possible Target Level Target Score Management Systems Man- Sustainability leadership and commitment 0.85 / Man- Risk and opportunity management 0.85 / 0.85 Man-3 Organisational structure, roles and responsibilities 0.85 / 0.85 Man-4 Inspection and auditing 0.85 / 0.85 Man-5 Reporting and review 0.85 / Man-6 Knowledge sharing.90 /3.7 Man-7 Decision-making.75 /3 0.9 Sub-total Procurement and Purchasing Pro- Commitment to sustainable procurement.06 / Pro- Identification of suppliers.06 / Pro-3 Supplier evaluation and contract award.06 / Pro-4 Managing supplier performance.06 / Sub-total 4.3. Climate Change Adaptation Cli- Climate change risk assessment /3.8 Cli- Adaptation options /3.8 Sub-total Energy and Carbon Ene- Energy and carbon monitoring and reduction 3.4 /3 7.6 Ene- Use of renewable energy 3.90 / Sub-total Water Wat- Water use monitoring and reduction /3 3.8 Wat- Replace potable water /3.06 Sub-total Materials Mat- Materials footprint measurement and reduction / Mat- Environmentally labelled products and supply chains 3.7 /3 0.4 Sub-total Discharges to Air, Land & Water Dis- Receiving water quality /3.0 Dis- Noise /3.68 Dis-3 Vibration /3.0 Dis-4 Air quality.0 /3.34 Dis-5 Light pollution 0.85 / 0.85 Sub-total Land Lan- Previous land use. 3/3. Lan- Conservation of on site resources 0.85 /3 0.8 Lan-3 Contamination and remediation.69 /3.3 Lan-4 Flooding design 3.90 / 0.95 Sub-total Waste Was- Waste management.69 /.69 Was- Diversion from landfill.96 /3.97 Was-3 De/ Disassembly/ Adaptability - /3 - Sub-total Ecology Eco- Ecological value 0 - /3 - Eco- Habitat connectivity 0 - /3 - Sub-total - - Community Health, Well-being and Safety Hea- Community health and well-being. /3.4 Hea- Crime prevention. /. Sub-total Heritage Her- Heritage assessment and management /3.8 Her- Monitoring and management of heritage /3.8 Sub-total Stakeholder Participation Sta- Stakeholder engagement strategy 3.59 / Sta- Level of engagement 3.59 /3.06 Sta-3 Effective communication 3.59 / 0.79 Sta-4 Addressing community concerns / - Sub-total Urban and Landscape Design Urb- Urban design / Urb- Implementation 0.85 / 0.85 Sub-total Innovation Inn- Innovation 0.00 /0.00 Sub-total Grand-total Score Rating 66 EXCELLENT Infrastructure Sustainability Rating Tool (Version.0)

156 As Built Charts Infrastructure Sustainability Scorecard Charts Project: Tunnels and Station Excavation Location: Sydney Rating Type: As Built Category Scores Category Weight Target Assessed R Assessed R Verified R 4 0 Points Man Pro Cli Ene Wat Mat Dis Lan Was Eco Hea Her Sta Urb Inn Credit Scores Points Available Target Assessed R Assessed R Verified R 0 8 Points Man-Man-Man-3Man-4Man-5Man-6Man-7 Pro- Pro- Pro-3 Pro-4 Cli- Cli- Ene- Ene- Wat- Wat- Mat- Mat- Dis- Dis- Dis-3 Dis-4 Dis-5 Lan- Lan- Lan-3 Lan-4 Was-Was-Was-3 Eco- Eco- Hea- Hea- Her- Her- Sta- Sta- Sta-3 Sta-4 Urb- Urb- Inn- Infrastructure Sustainability Rating Tool (Version.0) 9/0/0

157 APPENDICES Appendix D EOI questionnaires SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-EM-PLN-0003 page 4 of 4

158 ` Form EOI Document 6 EOI QUESTIONNAIRE 6. HEALTH AND SAFETY QUESTIONNAIRE The prospective tenderer must provide the following details (a brief summary will suffice): (a) Year: Provide the following statistics for the prospective tenderer s organisation for the last 3 years. Number of hours worked Number of Lost Time Injuries LTIFR Number of injuries where 0 or more days have been lost Permanent Disability or Fatality (if any, attach details to this questionnaire). Any notices / breaches from any safety authority please attach details (including any prohibition, improvement or penalty notices issued by SafeWork NSW) Details of any charges brought against your company or individuals by SafeWork NSW or ONRSR Details of any finalised prosecutions for breach of any Work Health and Safety laws (b) (c) Explain how your organisation demonstrates it s commitment to Safety and safety reporting Demonstrate how a safety culture will be instilled on the Project, and importantly, how this culture will be instilled in all subcontractors / suppliers (and any subcontractors engaged by the first subcontractor in a chain of subcontracts and any workers engaged by any of those subcontractors) and temporary workers entering the site. Please complete the questionnaire below. Item Question Subcontractor / Supplier Response/Comments. Does your company have a documented Health and Safety Policy? If YES, please attach a copy of the policy. Please give a brief overview of how this policy is communicated to workers and implemented. Does your company have a Safety Management System OR a documented Safety Management Plan including safety procedures? If YES to Safety Management System, does the system comply with Australian Standards Occupational health and safety management systems? And has your company s system been certified by a third party? Attach a copy of the current certificate (including Cert No. and Expiry Date) 3. Does your company agree to allow access for JHCPBG to complete an initial health and safety audit? 4. Do you agree that your company will participate in JHCPBGs Health and Safety program as required Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes / No Yes / No SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PR-FRM Form - EOI Document Page 7 of 36

159 ` Form EOI Document Item Question Subcontractor / Supplier Response/Comments (applicable to any company workers on site)? 5. What dedicated health and safety resource will be available, or provided by your company, to assist with health and safety compliance on the site? Provide names, job titles, qualifications and experience. 6 Please identify your company s gazetted workers compensation premium. Please identify under which industry has your company s gazetted rate been determined Is the premium subject to claims experience penalty / discount? What is the penalty / discount? Is your company willing to allow JHCPBG JV to verify the above with the insurer? 7. Does your company ensure that all workers, supervisors and managers are trained to perform the work required? If YES, attach details of health and safety training provided. 8 Does your company have a process which defines the process for the selection and / or assessment of supervisory resources? If YES, attach evidence. 9 How will your company comply with the plant safety requirements such as a) Operator competency b) Plant risk assessments c) Current maintenance history d) Daily Safety Check Log Books 0 Are senior site management and supervisory personnel required to conduct regular inspections and audits of the workplace? If YES please indicate frequency and attach a copy of your non-compliance reporting register Does your company have an injury management and return to work system in place? If YES, please provide a signed copy of the company rehabilitation policy. Does your company have a fitness for work policy that meets the requirements in Schedule 4 of Code for the Tendering and Performance of Building Work 06? If YES, attach a copy of the policy to this questionnaire. 3 Does your company have an Alcohol or Other Drugs Management program? Yes / No Yes / No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PR-FRM Form - EOI Document Page 8 of 36

160 ` Form EOI Document Item Question Subcontractor / Supplier Response/Comments If YES, attach a copy of the program to this questionnaire. 4 How will your company ensure consultation occurs on health and safety matters? 5 Are you proposing to use any vehicle with a GVM greater than 4.5 tonnes for the TSE works? If YES, are all the vehicles covered by NHVAS accreditation? Please provide a copy of the accreditation that covers the trucks you intend to use. Please confirm these vehicles are registered and that the drivers are appropriately licensed. COMPLETED BY: Yes/ No Name: Position: Signature: Date: JHCPBG OFFICE USE Comments: Overall Health and Safety Assessment (Compliant / Compliant but requires further information/ Not Compliant): Name: Position: Lead Safety or representative Signature: Date: SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PR-FRM Form - EOI Document Page 9 of 36

161 ` Form EOI Document 6. ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY Please complete the questionnaire below: Item Question Subcontractor / Supplier Response/Comments. Does your company have an environmental policy statement? If YES, please attach a copy of the policy. Please give a brief overview of how this policy is communicated to workers and implemented. Does your company have a sustainability policy statement? If YES, please attach a copy of the policy. Please give a brief overview of how this policy is communicated to workers and implemented. 3 Does your company have an ethical behaviour policy statement? If YES, please attach a copy of the policy. Please give a brief overview of how this policy is communicated to workers and implemented. If NO, please advise how you implement and monitor ethical behaviour within your company? 4 Does your company have an environmental management system? If YES is the system accredited by a 3 rd party? Please provide the certificate (including number, expiry date) When was the last time your system was audited? 5 If you answered NO to question 4 above, how are your activities managed, monitored and improved with regards to the environment? (please provide any relevant records) 6 Does your company agree to allow access for JHCPBG to complete an initial environment and sustainability audit? 7 How often will your senior management and supervisory personnel undertake environmental inspections and audits of your works scope with the specific intention of identifying environmental issues and improvement opportunities? JHCPBG may request evidence that these inspections and audits are being undertaken. 8 Has your company received any environmental prosecutions/convictions in the past 5 years? Has your company received any environmental infringements, notices, fines or orders from a regulator i.e. EPA or local council in the past five years? Other significant environmental incidents or potential legal action? If YES to any of the above please provide/ attached details of each one. 9 Has your company received any awards, commendations, compliments from previous clients or within the industry? If YES, please provide further detail Yes/ No (Note- if your sustainability policy is integrated with your environmental policy please advise) Yes/ No (Note- if your ethical behaviour policy is integrated with your environmental policy and/or sustainability policy please advise) Yes/ No Yes or No Yes/ No Date: Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes / No SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PR-FRM Form - EOI Document Page 0 of 36

162 ` Form EOI Document Item Question Subcontractor / Supplier Response/Comments 0 Confirm your awareness and understanding of, and compliance with the NSW Protection of the Environment Operations Act 997 Confirm your awareness and understanding of, and compliance with the NSW Environment Protection Authority s (EPA) Environmental Protection Licenses (EPL) The Subcontract Pack (Document No: SMCSTSE-JCG- TPW-CR-RPT-09500) identifies a number of sustainability targets that JHCPBG must achieve under the Head Contract. If required are you willing to work with JHCPBG to identify sustainability targets/ objectives relevant to your work scope and write these into your contract if successful. These targets will be discussed during the tender stage. It is noted that if sustainability targets/ objectives are agreed and written into your contract that JHCPBG will need to gather information from you in order to track performance against the targets/ objectives. 3 Is your company open to working with JHCPBG to identify ways to improve sustainability outcomes on the project? Has your company implemented processes to drive sustainable procurement? Is your company continually driving innovation to reduce social and environmental impacts? If YES, please provide further details or attach additional information. 4 Confirm your company will comply with any Waste, Energy, and Resource Use reporting associated with your works required by JHCPBG? (as per National Greenhouse & Energy Reporting requirements) It is noted that as part of the data capture process you will be required to participate in training to access JHCPBG s online system to submit monthly data. 5 Is your company willing to sign up and participate in free sustainability awareness training through the Supply Chain Sustainability School online portal as part of the tendering process, if required? 6 Who is responsible for managing environmental and sustainability aspects in your company? For supply contracts over $5Million and procured overseas: 7 Is you company willing to provide information on the following: Adoption of the International Labour Organisations Fundamental Conventions and commitment to the UN Global Compact principles Internal and external assurance processes. Is you company willing to respond to questions on adoption of compliance with local regulations and human rights? Yes / No Yes / No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/ No Yes/ No SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PR-FRM Form - EOI Document Page of 36

163 ` Form EOI Document Item Question Subcontractor / Supplier Response/Comments Yes/ No 8 If your company sources materials, products or fabricates products internationally are you aware of any incidents where they may have breached International Labour Standards? 9 Do you have any governance process in place to ensure those suppliers adhere to International Labour Standards? Completed by: Yes/ No Yes/ No Name: Position: Signature: Date: JHCPBG OFFICE USE Comments : Overall Environmental & Sustainability Assessment (Compliant / Compliant but requires further information/ Not Compliant): Name: Position: Approvals, Environmental & Sustainability or representative Signature: Date: SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PR-FRM Form - EOI Document Page of 36

164 ` Form EOI Document 6.3 WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AND EMPLOYEE RELATIONS Please complete the questionnaire below: Item Question Subcontractor / Supplier Response/Comments Please advise how you verify competencies (eg plant operator, trades, subcontractors etc) and what system you have in place to manage this information. Do you have a management statement of support for Aboriginal Participation? If NO, are you willing to work with JHCPBG under their statement of support? 3 Does your company implement initiatives to meet the Aboriginal Participation in Construction (August 06) policy? If YES, please provide details. If NO, would you we willing to work with JHCPBG to meet the requirements of this Policy? 4 What percentage of your current workforce: a) identify as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander? b) are females in non-traditional trades? c) are under 5? d) are apprentices and trainees? e) are participating in nationally recognised accredited training? JHCPBG have a number of targets that must be achieved under the Head Contract. If required are you willing to work with JHCPBG to identify targets relevant to your work scope and strategies for achieving these targets (if successful). These targets will be discussed during the tender stage. 5 The Subcontractor Pack (Document No SMCSTSE- JCG-TPW-CR-RPT-09500) identifies training which is required by TfNSW to be completed as part of the Sydney Metro Industry Curriculum (SMIC). Please confirm you have read the Subcontractor Pack and are prepared to support the level of training identified for your scope of works. JHCPBG notes that this will be further discussed during the Tender stage however please list any concerns you currently have with this approach. Completed by: Yes / No Yes / No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No a) b) c) d) e) Name: Position: Signature: Date: JHCPBG OFFICE USE Comments : SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PR-FRM Form - EOI Document Page 3 of 36

165 ` Form EOI Document Overall Training, Competency and Employee Relations Assessment (Compliant / Compliant but requires further information/ Not Compliant)): Name: Position: People and Culture or representative Signature: Date: SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PR-FRM Form - EOI Document Page 4 of 36

166 ` Form EOI Document 6.4 QUALITY AND ASSURANCE Please complete the questionnaire below: Item Question Subcontractor / Supplier Response/Comments Please advise the maturity of your Quality System tick one box: System independently certified compliant with AS900 and implemented for years. System documented to comply with AS900 and implemented for years, but not certified. System currently being documented and established to comply with AS900 No formal Quality system If you have ticked either the first or second boxes above has your Quality System been audited in the last 8 months by a 3 rd Party (either certification body, client)? If YES: Please state when and by whom. 3 Are you prepared to work under the JHCPBG Quality system, together with Inspection and Test Plans for the purpose of verifying the quality of your work and documenting compliance? If NO, please advise why and your proposed method of demonstrating compliance of your work. 4 Please detail your use of Inspection & Test Plans and identify other processes you use to ensure the quality of the work you deliver and demonstrate compliance? 5 Please provide details of how you would handle discrepancies, apparent mistakes and proposed changes in project drawings, specifications and/or control documents (eg Work Packs or ITP s). 6 Please provide detail of how you will ensure your team are always working with the current approved version of project documentation (produced yourself and/or received from JHGCPBG). 7 Please provide details (and recent examples) of how you manage instances where completed work is not in compliance with the subcontract requirements and project drawings, specifications and/or control documents. 8 Please provide details (and recent examples) of measures taken to improve the quality of your product and minimise waste due to repair/rework. 9 Please identify any test equipment that you propose to use that requires calibration and provide detail of how you will ensure this equipment is fit for purpose and within calibration. 0 Please identify the steps you will take to ensure the quality and compliance records for your works are verified correct and submitted progressively over the subcontract period. Yes / No Yes / No SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PR-FRM Form - EOI Document Page 5 of 36

167 ` Form EOI Document Item Question Subcontractor / Supplier Response/Comments Does your Company undertake Quality Audits of its internal processes and /or those of its subcontractors or suppliers? Does your Company agree to allow access for JHCPBG to complete an initial evaluation of any applicable off site facilities (or those of your proposed key subcontractors / suppliers) to be used to deliver the subcontracted works, prior to tender? 3 Does your Company agree to allow access for JHCPBG (possibly accompanied by TfNSW, the Independent Certifier or others, if required) to audit your processes and records (or those of your proposed key subcontractors / suppliers) during the subcontract term, to confirm ongoing compliance. COMPLETED BY: Name: Position: Signature: Date: JHCPBG OFFICE USE Comments : Overall Quality Assessment (Compliant / Compliant but requires further information/ Not Compliant): Name: Position: Assurance or representative Signature: Date: SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PR-FRM Form - EOI Document Page 6 of 36

168 ` Form EOI Document 6.5 COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT Please complete the questionnaire below: Item Question Subcontractor / Supplier Response/Comments. Does your organisation have a Community or Customer relations Policy? If YES- please provide a copy Does your organisation have a complaints management procedure? If YES- please provide a copy 3 Please describe any training you have undertaken to ensure your employees and subcontractors are aware of community obligations. This includes being courteous to members of the public and avoiding behaviours that would cause offence or a nuisance (eg parking on private property, or using bad language near homes) 4 Does your organisation agree to provide a point of contact to assist JHCPBG to investigate and manage any complaints that result from the actions of your employees or subcontractors. 5 Does your organisation understand it not permitted to make any media statements or release any information about the project to the public without prior approval. This includes media releases, photographs, website copy, social media such as Linkedin, and Facebook, or industry/ conference presentations. COMPLETED BY: Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Name: Position: Signature: Date: JHCPBG OFFICE USE Comments : Overall Community & Stakeholder Assessment (Compliant / Compliant but requires further information/ Not Compliant): Name: Position: Senior Stakeholder and Community Relations or representative Signature: Date: SMCSWTSE-JCG-TPW-PR-FRM Form - EOI Document Page 7 of 36