BWR3 Mark I. Dr. John H. Bickel
|
|
- Posy Henderson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Beyond the Design Bases BWR3 Mark I Dr. John H. Bickel
2 BWR3, Mark I DBA Features: Electric di driven Mi Main Feedwater, Condensate Pumps 2 Diesels supply: 4kV power, 480V, 250VDC, 125VDC 2 Trains Electric Driven LPCI with 2 RHR Heat Exchangers Safety system designed for Large Design Bases LOCA LPCI also has Drywell and Suppression Pool Spray Function 2 Trains Electric Driven Core Spray Pumps Safety system designed for Large Design Bases LOCA 1 Train HPCI with suction from CST Safety system designed for Small/Medium LOCA Automatic Depressurization System Safety system designed for Small/Medium LOCA with HPCI failure 1 Train RCIC with suction from CST Non Safety system designed for heat removal when main condenser unavailable 2 Trains Control Rod Drive Hydraulic Pumps (~90 200gpm) 2
3 BWR3, Mark I Beyond DBA Features: 2 trains Manual SLCS capable of injecting Sodium Pentaborate Anticipated i t dtransients Without t Scram CST can be replenished with River water or Fire Truck to prolong HPCI, RCIC, CRD injection Security Diesel 480V power can be connected to Battery Chargers (pre staged cable spools with quick connect plugs) Alternate Makeup to Reactor via existing piping connections: RHR Service Water (from River) Diesel Driven Fire Pump (from River) B.5.b 5bPump (from River) 18 Hard Pipe Vent from Torus to Atmosphere (preferred) 18 Hard Pipe Vent from Drywell to Atmosphere (alternate) 18 equivalent to ~21 MWt decay heat removal (~decay heat after 1 hr) 3
4 BWR 3 with Mark I Containment (Courtesy of General Electric) Features: Engineered in 1960 s to address Large DBA LOCA Design Press: 56psig Ultimate Press. ~110psig HardPipeVent installed to vent Torus to atmosphere Limitations: Small, compact, containment volume requires N 2 inerting for DBA LOCA Credits DBA Large LOCA containment pressure to assure ECCS pump NPSH Not designed dfor severe accidents 4
5 Mark I Containment Under Construction 5
6 Upper Reactor Building Refueling 6
7 Upper Reactor Building Operating 7
8 8 Safety/Relief Valves (S/RVs) Features: Dual Action Mechanical spring loaded overpressure safety ft function DC/N 2 operated relief valve function (for automatic depressurization) 3/8 S/RVs used to rapidly depressurize RPV to allow core flooding. Limitations: Physically located in Drywell On loss of DC, or Press>75psig: relief mode is inoperable Electro pneumatic controller will likely fail if Drywell Temp. > 325 F 8
9 High Pressure Coolant Injection System: Features: Can inject at full system press. (1050psia) ~1.5x10 6 lbs/hr makeup capability Designed to mitigate small, medium LOCA Can be started locally, run without DC power Limitations: Needs RPV supply press. > 50psig Needs exhaust (Torus) press. <75psig DC power needed to remote start When Torus used as water source, Temperature < 200 F 9
10 High Pressure RCIC System : Features: Can inject at full system press. (1050psia) ~2x10 5 lbs/hr makeup capability (smaller than HPCI) Designed to provide makeup after shutdown when FW unavailable Can be started locally, run without DC power Limitations: Needs RPV supply press. > 50psig Needs exhaust (Torus) press. <75psig DC power needed to remote start When Torus used as water source, Temperature < 200 F 10
11 What RCIC Turbine Driven Pump Looks Like 11
12 Station Batteries Features: 2x 250V Batteries 2x 125V Batteries Typical Lead Acid storage cells Limitations: 250V Batteries deplete in 7 8 hrs without charging 125V Batteries deplete in hrs without charging Depletion defined as insufficient voltage to operate critical SOVs 12
13 Containment Vent for Beyond Design Bases Accidents Main Features: 1 from Suppression Pool and 1 from Drywell Redundant air operated butterfly valves (fail closed on loss of air) >56 psig rupture disk to prevent operation below design bases pressure Requires DC power, compressed air to operate 13
14 Loss of Feedwater with no Heat Removal Initially more severe than Loss of Offsite Power Reactor trip, MSIV closure is Delayed Rate of initial RPV Level Drop is Faster Steam Driven high pressure makeup sources (HPCI, RCIC) not Considered yet CRD Hydraulic makeup not considered yet AC/DC power available, compressed N 2 available Operators follow EOPs and depressurize at TAF reflooding with LPCI to achieve stable water levels Suppression Pool Cooling fails over long term Drywell Chillers, Containment Venting not considered 14
15 Loss of Feedwater with no Recovery, and Loss of HPCI, RCIC first 2 hrs. 15
16 Emergency Depressurization allows Low Pressure Coolant Injection to reflood core 16
17 At this point RPV level is restored and core cooling using injected LPCI flow fromtorus 17
18 BUT: without Torus cooling Containment Temperatures, Pressures will continually rise 18
19 Reclosure of S/RVs ~21.5hrs: causes RPV press. rise above LPCI pump pshutoff pressure 19
20 With no venting, core uncovers ~29hrs while pressure remains elevated at S/RV safety valve press. 20
21 Delayed Core Heatup starts at ~29.5hrs with Zr Water Reaction starting ~30.5hrs 21
22 Containment Failure Likely Occurs at 35 37hrs. Accompanied by H 2 burn of in reactor building 22
23 Consequences would be Large Delayed Release (~30% Core CsI) after Containment Failure 23
24 If unable to vent, how much makeup needed to keep core covered? Match boil off due to decay heat: W BOIL = Q DECAY (26hrs)/Δh Q DECAY (26hrs) = 3.88x10 7 BTU/hr Δh = h sat (1050psia) h CST (80F) ~ BTU/lbm W BOIL = (3.88x10 7 BTU/hr)/( BTU/lbm) = 34,000 lbm/hr or: = (567 lbm/min)(0.016ft 3 /lbm) = 9.07ft 3 /min Converting to gal/min, this is only: ~67.8 gpm Recall: CRD makeup flow to RPV is: gpm Running 1 electric CRD pump could easily keep the core covered for an indefinite periodof of time 24
25 Evaluation of Station AC Blackout Loss of offsite power causes: Loss of Feedwater. Loss of Recirculation Flow, MSIV closure, Reactor Trip, Recirc. Pump Seal Leakage likely Diesels fail, DC Batteries begin to discharge All AC powered equipment shuts down Feedwater and condensate pumps Drywell Coolers, room cooling LPCI, Core Spray, CRD pumps cannot be operated HPCI, RCIC potentially available provided RPV steam and DC available for starting, and until room temperatures > 150 F CST available as water source S/RVs potentially ill available to blow down if containment pressure <75 psig, and BOTH: DC power, compressed N 2 available Diesel Fire Pump (portable pumps) potentially available until out of fuel 25
26 HPCI, RCIC start on low level, RCIC throttled suction from CST, and run on local/manual l/ lwithout t DC power 26
27 RPV water level could be maintained until ~16.4 hrs when RCIC shuts down 27
28 RCIC runs until high discharge pressure trip S/RVs unavailable to depressurize and then use Fire Pump DC Power gone after ~7 8hrs, Drywell Temperatures too high ~11hrs 28
29 What is learned from all this: If there is no containment heat removal working, high pressure steam driven pumps will eventually shutdown on backpressure at ~16.4hrs Batteries (without chargers) will all be depleted by ~7 8hrs and unavailable to open S/RVs or containment vent valves. Drywell temperatures >325 F limit for S/RV operation at ~11.25hrs Containment pressure reaches >56psig for venting containment at ~17hrs but this is 10hrs after battery depletion Venting at this time could allow local manual restarting of RCIC pump in time to recover water level but there is no DC power In Station AC Blackout: containment venting needs to be performed earlier to preserve core cooling options. Maintaining core cooling is totally dependent d on DC power 29
30 Using these insights: Simulation studies then performed on how to successfully cope with prolonged SBO but also: Seismic SBO Seismic SBO differs from SBO: Offsite power recovery may require weeks vs. hours Possibly destroys CST (requiring i HPCI, RCIC CCsuction from Torus) This causes more rapid Torus Heatup Possibly destroys Diesel Fire Water makeup (buried piping, cast iron piping in buildings) Successful coping depends on: Gasoline powered portable DCbattery chargers (or Security Diesel ) Portable, Gasoline powered pumps Air compressor or bottled gas supply 30
31 Strategy: Break Rupture Disk below 56 psig using bottled gas cylinder and test connection 31
32 Use HPCI once, manually throttle RCIC to maintain RPV level until it stops 32
33 Vent Containment to hold pressure between psig 33
34 Initiate Manual Depressurization when Suppression Pool ~200 F (as in current EOPs) 34
35 After depressurization at ~8hrs core cooling can be provided by 100gpm portable pump 35
36 What is learned from all this: Achieving an indefinite coping time for Seismic SBO requires changing current BWR Severe Accident Management Guidelines Current guidance to use HPCI once and throttled RCIC works Alternate means will be needed for DC Battery charging ~ 5hrs Venting Containment is needed earlier (> 8hrs) to maintain lower Drywell Temperatures to operate S/RVs allowing emergency RPV depressurization Earlier venting requires defeating 56 psig rupture disk Emergency RPV depressurization ascurrently in EOPs will allow use of smaller portable pumps Successfully executing this strategy requires logistics of staged equipment and supply of consumables (fuel, compressed gas) 36
37 Supplemental 37
38 How Long Can NPP Cope Without Decay Heat Removal? Coping time is: time from when heat removal is lost to onset of severe core damage (available recovery time) Coping time considers: Physical inertia built into reactor design via water to core power ratio Effects of water makeup systems Effects of support features (DC power, HVAC) which enable water makeup systems 38
39 Simplified Decay Heat Model: 39
40 Behavior of RPV Level with RCIC: Assume pressure ~1050 psia, constant due to relief valve operation At constant pressure water mass loss is related to decay heat, thus: W = = LOSS (t) Q DECAY (t) / h fg 0.15Q o t / h fg (h fg = 640 BTU/lbm.) Assume core output initially at: Q o ~6.84x10 9 BTU/hr Assume when activated: RCIC injects: W RCIC (t) ~2.0x10 5 lbm./hr. Assume initial water mass above core: M CORE ~1.2x10 5 lbm. Behavior of water inventory governed by: dm dt M CORE CORE M CORE W RCIC W LOSS t Q ot ( t ) M CORE (0) ( WRCIC ) dt h 0.15Qo (0) W RCIC t t (0.714) h 0 fg fg 40
41 After water level recovers, RCIC will stop 41
42 Behavior of Water after RCIC stops: Assume RCIC can not be operated after 8hrs Pressure ~1050 psia and constant due to relief valve operation At constant pressure water mass loss still related to decay heat U2, U3 core output initially at: Q o ~8.13E+9 BTU/hr When RCIC stops: W RCIC (t) ~0.0 lbm./hr. Assume same initial water mass above core: M CORE ~ 1.2E+5 lbm. Behavior of water inventory governed by: dm CORE WLOSS dt M CORE M ( t ) CORE M CORE (8 hrs ) t 0.15Q ot ( h 0.15Qo (8 hrs ) ( t 8 hrs 0.714h fg 8 fg ) dt ) 42
43 Behavior of Water after RCIC stops: Slow steady boil off dictated dby decay heat curve 43
44 44
45 45
Fukushima Daiichi NPP Accident
Fukushima Daiichi NPP Accident Plant Design and Preliminary Observations K. Moriya and K. Sato Hitachi GE Nuclear Energy, Ltd. May 3, 2011 [Note] 1. The view expressed herein are not the official view
More informationFukushima Event PCTRAN Analysis. Dr. LI-Chi Cliff Po. Dr. LI-Chi Cliff Po. March 25, 2011
Fukushima Event PCTRAN Analysis Dr. LI-Chi Cliff Po Fukushima Event PCTRAN Analysis Dr. LI-Chi Cliff Po 1. Description of Event March 25, 2011 The earthquake caused instant loss of offsite power. The scale-9
More information* Science Applications International, Corporation
CORE DAMAGE FREQUENCY PERSPECTIVES FOR BWR 314 AND WESTINGHOUSE 4iLOOP PLANTS BASED ON IPE RESULTS Susan Dingman, Jeff LaChance, Allen Canip, Mary Drouin Sandia National Laboratories * Science Applications
More informationPSA Michael Powell, Roy Linthicum, Richard Haessler, Jeffrey Taylor
PSA-2017 Crediting the Use of a Rapidly Deployable Mobile to Recover from and Core Damage Events Caused by a Failure of the Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Michael Powell, Roy Linthicum, Richard Haessler,
More informationIsolation Condenser; water evaporation in the tank and steam into the air. Atmosphere (in Severe Accident Management, both P/S and M/S)
Loss of Ultimate Heat Sink ANS AESJ AESJ Fukushima Symposium, March h4, 2012 Hisashi Ninokata, Tokyo Institute of Technology Available ultimate heat sinks at 1F1~3 1F1 (Fukushima Dai ichi Unit 1) Sea water
More informationTEPCO s Nuclear Power Plants suffered from big earthquake of March 11,2011
TEPCO s Nuclear Power Plants suffered from big earthquake of March 11,2011 Follow up prepared at 4pm of March 23 in Japan Yoshiaki Oka Waseda university Recovery action is in progress. The presentation
More informationTEPCO s Nuclear Power Plants suffered from big earthquake of March 11,2011
TEPCO s Nuclear Power Plants suffered from big earthquake of March 11,2011 Follow up prepared at 4pm of March 23, revised 1pm of March 31 Yoshiaki Oka Waseda university Recovery action is in progress.
More informationAP1000 European 15. Accident Analysis Design Control Document
15.2 Decrease in Heat Removal by the Secondary System A number of transients and accidents that could result in a reduction of the capacity of the secondary system to remove heat generated in the reactor
More informationC. heating turbine exhaust steam above its saturation temperature. D. cooling turbine exhaust steam below its saturation temperature.
P74 (B2277) Condensate depression is the process of... A. removing condensate from turbine exhaust steam. B. spraying condensate into turbine exhaust steam. C. heating turbine exhaust steam above its saturation
More informationWestinghouse AP1000 Nuclear Power Plant
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 April 2011 Westinghouse AP1000 Nuclear Power Plant Coping with Station Blackout Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 April 2011 Westinghouse AP1000 Nuclear Power Plant
More informationThe Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident Tomomi Matsunaga Kansai Electric Power Company Cooperation with JEPIC (Japan an Electric Power Information Center) Nuclear Power Plants in Japan 2 1
More informationThe cause of RCIC shutdown in Unit 3
Attachment 3-5 The cause of RCIC shutdown in Unit 3 1. Outline of the incident and issues to be examined Unit 3 experienced a station blackout when it was hit by tsunami on March 11 th, 2011, following
More informationSevere Accident Progression Without Operator Action
DAA Technical Assessment Review of the Moderator Subcooling Requirements Model Severe Accident Progression Without Operator Action Facility: Darlington Classification: October 2015 Executive summary After
More informationStation Blackout Analysis for a 3-Loop Westinghouse PWR Reactor Using TRACE
The Egyptian Arab Journal of Nuclear Sciences and Applications Society of Nuclear Vol 50, 3, (229-239) 2017 Sciences and Applications ISSN 1110-0451 Web site: esnsa-eg.com (ESNSA) Station Blackout Analysis
More informationThe ESBWR an advanced Passive LWR
1 IAEA PC-Based Simulators Workshop Politecnico di Milano, 3-14 October 2011 The ES an advanced Passive LWR Prof. George Yadigaroglu, em. ETH-Zurich and ASCOMP yadi@ethz.ch 2 Removal of decay heat from
More informationRecommendations are based on validity of above assumptions.
RST Assessment offukushima Daiichi Units, UNIT ONE ASSUMPTIONS: (based on input from multiple data source: JAIF, NISA, TEPCO, & GEH) Core Status: Core is contained in the reactor pressure vessel, reactor
More informationDiverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX) Implementation Guide
NEI 12-06 Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX) Implementation Guide N U C L E A R E N E R G Y I N S T I T U T E REV. B1 SUITE 4001776 I STREET, NW 20006-3708 202.739.8000 WASHINGTON, DC ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
More informationSummary of the ABWR Key Features. Chapter2 Plant Overview 2-1. Safety Enhancement
Chapter2 Plant Overview The key design objectives for the ABWR were established during the development program. The key goals, all of which were achieved, are as follows: Design life of 60 years. Plant
More informationLessons Learned from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident and Consequent Safety Improvements
Hitachi Review Vol. 62 (2013), No. 1 75 Lessons Learned from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident and Consequent Safety Improvements Masayoshi Matsuura Kohei Hisamochi Shinichiro Sato Kumiaki
More informationFUKUSHIMA DAIICHI BWR REACTOR SPRAY AND FEED WATER SYSTEMS EVALUATION FOR EARLY FAILURE Dean Wilkie
FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI BWR REACTOR SPRAY AND FEED WATER SYSTEMS EVALUATION FOR EARLY FAILURE Dean Wilkie The BWR reactor vessel spray(core spray) and feed water spray systems are designed to inject water into
More informationWestinghouse Small Modular Reactor. Passive Safety System Response to Postulated Events
Westinghouse Small Modular Reactor Passive Safety System Response to Postulated Events Matthew C. Smith Dr. Richard F. Wright Westinghouse Electric Company Westinghouse Electric Company 600 Cranberry Woods
More informationCANDU Safety #14 - Loss of Heat Sink Dr. V.G. Snell Director Safety & Licensing
CANDU Safety #14 - Loss of Heat Sink Dr. V.G. Snell Director Safety & Licensing 24/05/01 CANDU Safety - #14 - Loss of Heat Sink.ppt Rev. 0 vgs 1 Steam and Feedwater System steam lines have isolation valves
More informationNSSS Design (Ex: PWR) Reactor Coolant System (RCS)
NSSS Design (Ex: PWR) Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Purpose: Remove energy from core Transport energy to S/G to convert to steam of desired pressure (and temperature if superheated) and moisture content
More informationPreliminary Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident for Advanced Nuclear Power Plant Technology Development
Preliminary Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Daiichi Accident for Advanced Nuclear Power Plant Technology Development A. Introduction The IAEA Report on Reactor and Spent Fuel Safety in the Light of
More informationAP1000 European 16. Technical Specifications Design Control Document
16.3 Investment Protection 16.3.1 Investment Protection Short-term Availability Controls The importance of nonsafety-related systems, structures and components in the AP1000 has been evaluated. The evaluation
More informationTEPCO s Nuclear Power Plants suffered from big earthquake of March 11,2011
TEPCO s Nuclear Power Plants suffered from big earthquake of March 11,2011 Follow up prepared at 4pm of March 23, revised April 13 Yoshiaki Oka Waseda university Recovery action is in progress. The presentation
More informationDevelopment of Medium-size ABWR Aiming at Diversification and Amount Control of Plant Investment
Development of Medium-size ABWR Aiming at Diversification and Amount Control of Plant Investment 136 Development of Medium-size ABWR Aiming at Diversification and Amount Control of Plant Investment Shoichiro
More informationNPP Simulators Workshop for Education - Passive PWR NPP & Simulator Overview
NPP Simulators Workshop for Education - Passive PWR NPP & Simulator Overview Wilson Lam (wilson@cti-simulation.com) CTI Simulation International Corp. www.cti-simulation.com Sponsored by IAEA Modified
More informationApplication of Technologies in CANDU Reactors to Prevent/Mitigate the Consequences of a Severe Accidents
Application of Technologies in CANDU Reactors to Prevent/Mitigate the Consequences of a Severe Accidents Lovell Gilbert Section Manager/Technical Advisor, Reactor Safety Engineering Bruce Power IAEA International
More informationFindings from the latest analyses using MAAP5
Attachment 3 Findings from the latest analyses using MAAP5 1. Latest analysis of Unit-1 by MAAP5.01 1.1. Plant conditions and event chronology Table 1-1 summarizes key plant conditions, while Table 1-2
More informationLecture 7 Heat Removal &
Containment Dr. V.G. Snell Nuclear Reactor Safety Course McMaster University Containment R4 vgs 1 Where We Are (still) Deterministic Requirements Experience Chapter 3 Chapter 1 Safety Goals Chapter 6 Probabilistic
More informationOutline of New Safety Standard (Design Basis) (DRAFT) For Public Comment
Provisional Translation (Feb.13,2013 Rev.0) February 6, 2013 Outline of New Safety Standard (Design Basis) (DRAFT) For Public Comment 0 February 6, 2013 Outline of New Safety Standard (Design Basis) (DRAFT)
More informationLessons Learned from Fukushima-Daiichi Accident (Safety Measures and PSA Utilization)
PSAM12 2013 Tokyo Lessons Learned from Fukushima-Daiichi Accident (Safety Measures and PSA Utilization) April 15, 2013 Akio Komori (Takafumi Anegewa) Tokyo Electric Power Company All Rights Reserved 2013The
More informationAnnex III of Technical Volume 1 UNIT 3 SEQUENCE OF EVENTS
Annex III of Technical Volume 1 Colour indication: after Auto/; 2011-03-11 14:46 00:00 min Earthquake occurred. Initiating external event. - 52:00 min 2011-03-11 14:47 01:00 min Reactor trip on seismic
More informationDeconstructing the Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima-Daiichi Plant: What Went Wrong and What are the Prospects of Recovery?
Deconstructing the Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima-Daiichi Plant: What Went Wrong and What are the Prospects of Recovery? Goldschmidt Conference 2011 Fukushima Review Session Prague, Czech Republic Edward
More informationExample Pressurized Water Reactor Defense-in-Depth Measures For GSI-191, PWR Sump Performance
Example Pressurized Water Reactor Defense-in-Depth Measures For GSI-191, PWR Sump Performance ATTACHMENT Introduction This paper describes a range of defense-in-depth measures that either currently exist
More informationCANDU Safety #6 - Heat Removal Dr. V.G. Snell Director Safety & Licensing
CANDU Safety #6 - Heat Removal Dr. V.G. Snell Director Safety & Licensing 24/05/01 CANDU Safety - #6 - Heat Removal.ppt Rev. 0 vgs 1 Overview the steam and feedwater system is similar in most respects
More informationFatigue Monitoring for Demonstrating
Fatigue Monitoring for Demonstrating Fatigue Design Basis Compliance Timothy J. Griesbach Structural Integrity Associates IAEA 2 nd International Symposium on Nuclear Power Plant Life Mgmt. 15-18 October,
More informationPlant Layout. Chapter Plant Layout and Arrangement 8-1
8 Chapter Plant Layout and Arrangement Plant Layout The ABWR Plant includes all buildings which are dedicated to housing systems and the equipment related to the nuclear system or controls access to this
More informationCRFA System B BASES
CRFA System B 3.7.2 APPLICABLE SAFETY ANALYSES LCO and 15 ( Refs. 3 and 4, respectively). The isolation mode of the CRFA System is assumed to operate following a DBA. The radiological doses to CRE occupants
More informationNew Safety Standards (SA) Outline (Draft) For Public Comment
Provisional Translation (Feb.7,2013 Rev.0) February 6, 2013 New Safety Standards (SA) Outline (Draft) For Public Comment 0 February 6, 2013 New Safety Standards (SA) Outline (Draft) Table of Contents Foreword
More informationLOCA analysis of high temperature reactor cooled and moderated by supercritical light water
GENES4/ANP23, Sep. 15-19, Kyoto, JAPAN Paper 116 LOCA analysis of high temperature reactor cooled and moderated by supercritical light water Yuki Ishiwatari 1*, Yoshiaki Oka 1 and Seiichi Koshizuka 1 1
More informationGE Hitachi's ABWR and ESBWR: safer, simpler, smarter
GE Hitachi's ABWR and ESBWR: safer, simpler, smarter OECD/NEA Workshop on innovations in water-cooled reactor technologies Issy-les-Moulineaux, Paris 11-12 February, 2015 David Powell Vice President Nuclear
More informationTHE FUKUSHIMA ACCIDENT: CAUSES, RESULTS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR EUROPE
THE FUKUSHIMA ACCIDENT: CAUSES, RESULTS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR EUROPE Steven C. Sholly, Senior Scientist Institute of Safety and Risk Sciences Department of Water, Atmosphere & Environment University of
More informationTOPIC: KNOWLEDGE: K1.01 [2.5/2.5]
KNOWLEDGE: K1.01 [2.5/2.5] P283 The transfer of heat from the reactor fuel pellets to the fuel cladding during normal plant operation is primarily accomplished via heat transfer. A. conduction B. convection
More informationFukushima Accident Summary(3) 2011-July-17, Ritsuo Yoshioka (Text in blue are Yoshioka s comments) 1) Earthquake and Tsunami
Fukushima Accident Summary(3) 2011-July-17, Ritsuo Yoshioka (Text in blue are Yoshioka s comments) 1) Earthquake and Tsunami 14:46 March 11th 2011 (Please see Summary-1 report for detail.) Tohoku Pacific
More informationAP1000 European 7. Instrumentation and Controls Design Control Document
7.5 Safety-Related Display Information 7.5.1 Introduction An analysis is conducted to identify the appropriate variables and to establish the appropriate design bases and qualification criteria for instrumentation
More informationBoiling Water Reactor Simulator with Passive Safety Systems
Boiling Water Reactor Simulator with Passive Safety Systems User Manual October 2009 2 INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, 2009 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Nuclear Power
More informationUNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C December 27, 2017
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 December 27, 2017 Mr. Bryan C. Hanson President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
More informationRecent Issues in Reactor Thermalhydraulics and Safety
Recent Issues in Reactor Thermalhydraulics and Safety Sanjoy Banerjee Distinguished Professor and Director, The Energy Institute The City College of New York, New York banerjee@che.ccny.cuny.edu June 2012,
More informationFukushima Dai-ichi. Short overview of 11 March 2011 accidents and considerations. 3 rd EMUG Meeting ENEA Bologna April 2011
Fukushima Dai-ichi Short overview of 11 March 2011 accidents and considerations Marco Sangiorgi - ENEA 3 rd EMUG Meeting ENEA Bologna 11-12 April 2011 NPPs affected by Earthquake NPPs affected by Earthquake
More informationSafety Enhancement of Nuclear Power Plant Post Fukushima. Kumiaki Moriya
International Conference on Nuclear Governance Post-Fukushima Marina Bay Sands, Singapore, 31 October 2013 Safety Enhancement of Nuclear Power Plant Post Fukushima October 31,2013 Kumiaki Moriya Hitachi-GE
More informationStatus report Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR)
Status report 100 - Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR) Overview Full name Acronym Reactor type Coolant Moderator Neutron spectrum Thermal capacity Gross Electrical capacity Design status
More informationDesign of the ESBWR reactor
Design of the ESBWR reactor Chris Maslak, Marketing Leader, New Units, GE Energy-Nuclear Anders Carlson, Sales Manager, Nordic Accounts, GE Energy-Nuclear Jaime Segarra, Global Sales Manager, Europe, GE
More informationACR Safety Systems Safety Support Systems Safety Assessment
ACR Safety Systems Safety Support Systems Safety Assessment By Massimo Bonechi, Safety & Licensing Manager ACR Development Project Presented to US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF LOW POWER SHUTDOWN LEVEL 1 PSA MODEL FOR WESTINGHOUSE TYPE REACTORS IN KOREA : OVERVIEW, RESULTS AND INSIGHTS
DEVELOPMENT OF LOW POWER SHUTDOWN LEVEL 1 PSA MODEL FOR WESTINGHOUSE TYPE REACTORS IN KOREA : OVERVIEW, RESULTS AND INSIGHTS Yong Suk LEE 1, Eden KIM 1,Gunhyo JUNG 1, Seok-won HWANG 2, Ho-jun JEON 2 1
More informationUK ABWR - NEW NPP DESIGN FOR UK
IAEA PLiM2017 [IAEA-CN-246-085] UK ABWR - NEW NPP DESIGN FOR UK 25-October-2017 Kazuhiro YOSHIKAWA Masaaki HAYASHI Yasuhiro MABUCHI Daisuke TANIGUCHI Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy, Ltd. Contents 1. Introduction
More informationSafety Assessment and Improvements in Indian Nuclear Power Plants
IAEA-CN-164-6S03 Safety Assessment and Improvements in Indian Nuclear Power Plants P.Krishna kumar, S.Hajela, P.K.Malhotra and S.G.Ghadge Directorate of Reactor Safety and Analysis, Nuclear Power Corporation
More informationIAEA-J4-TM TM for Evaluation of Design Safety
Canadian Nuclear Utility Principles for Beyond Design Basis Accidents IAEA-J4-TM-46463 TM for Evaluation of Design Safety Mark R Knutson P Eng. Director of Fukushima Projects Ontario Power Generation Overview
More informationNuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level
Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level Safety of Nuclear Power Plants Overview of the Nuclear Safety Features on the Power Plant
More informationNuclear Power Plant Safety Basics. Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level
Nuclear Power Plant Safety Basics Construction Principles and Safety Features on the Nuclear Power Plant Level Safety of Nuclear Power Plants Overview of the Nuclear Safety Features on the Power Plant
More informationSubject: ONR Interim Report -Japanese Earthquake and Tsunami: Implications to the UK Nuclear Industry- 18 May 2011
Westinghouse Electric Company 42 Eaton Avenue Buckshaw Village Chorley, Lancashire PR7 7NA United Kingdom FAO Mike Weightman HM Chief Inspector of Nuclear Installations Redgrave Court Merton Road Bootle
More informationGrid Stability and Safety Issues Associated With Nuclear Power Plants
Grid Stability and Safety Issues Associated With Nuclear Power Plants Dr. John H. Bickel, Ph.D. Workshop on International Grid Interconnection in Northeast Asia Beijing, China May 14-16, 2001 1 Items to
More informationThe 2011 Tohoku Pacific Earthquake and Current Status of Nuclear Power Stations
The 2011 Tohoku Pacific Earthquake and Current Status of Nuclear Power Stations March 31, 2011 Tokyo Electric Power Company Tohoku Pacific Ocean Earthquake Time: 2:46 pm on Fri, March 11, 2011. Place:
More informationA Study of Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accidents by the Viewpoint of PSA
A Study of Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accidents by the Viewpoint of PSA Takeshi MATSUOKA (*) Utsunomiya University, 7-1-2 Yoto, Utsunomiya city, Tochigi pref. Japan 321-8585 mats@cc.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp
More informationTHE ROLE OF PASSIVE SYSTEMS IN ENHANCING SAFETY AND PREVENTING ACCIDENTS IN ADVANCED REACTORS
THE ROLE OF PASSIVE SYSTEMS IN ENHANCING SAFETY AND PREVENTING ACCIDENTS IN ADVANCED REACTORS M. Aziz Nuclear and radiological regulatory authority Cairo, Egypt moustafaaaai@yahoo.com Abstract Most of
More informationIV. Occurrence and Development of the Accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations
IV. Occurrence and Development of the Accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations 1. Outline of Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations (1) Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear
More informationSafety Aspects of SMRs: A PRA Perspective
Safety Aspects of SMRs: A PRA Perspective Mohammad Modarres Minta Martin Professor of Engineering Director, Reliability Engineering Program Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Maryland,
More informationSevere Accident in Fukushima Dai ichi Nuclear Power Plant and Lessons Learned. October 14 th, 2015
Severe Accident in Fukushima Dai ichi Nuclear Power Plant and Lessons Learned October 14 th, 2015 Akira Yamaguchi University of Tokyo, JAPAN E mail: yamaguchi@n.t.u tokyo.ac.jp 1 The Beginning The first
More informationDesign Safety Improvements at Swiss BWRs after Fukushima
Design Safety Improvements at Swiss BWRs after Fukushima IAEA Technical Meeting on Evaluation of NPP Safety Design in the Aftermath of the Fukushima - Daiichi Accident IAEA Technical Meeting, Vienna 26-29
More informationStatus report 97 - Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR)
Status report 97 - Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR) Overview Full name Acronym Reactor type Coolant Moderator Neutron spectrum Thermal capacity Gross Electrical capacity Design status Designers Advanced
More informationPresentation Outline. Basic Reactor Physics and Boiling Water Design Sequence of Events Consequences and Mitigation Conclusions and Lessons Learned
Response of the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Plant to the March 11, 2011 Earthquake in Japan Dr. George Flanagan Oak Ridge National Laboratory Presented to the EERI/NEC Meeting April 12, 2012 Presentation
More informationAP1000 The PWR Revisited
IAEA-CN-164-3S05 AP1000 The PWR Revisited Paolo Gaio Westinghouse Electric Company gaiop@westinghouse.com Abstract. For nearly two decades, Westinghouse has pursued an improved pressurized water reactor
More informationStation Blackout and Nuclear Safety
Station Blackout and Nuclear Safety Andrija Volkanovski, Andrej Prošek Jožef Stefan Institute Jamova cesta 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Andrija.Volkanovski@ijs.si, Andrej.Prosek@ijs.si ABSTRACT The
More informationComprehensive Safety Assessment for Kashiwazaki Kariwa NPS
Comprehensive Safety Assessment for Kashiwazaki Kariwa NPS International Experts Meeting on Reactor and Spent Fuel Safety in the Light of the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant IAEA,
More informationStatus report 98 - Advanced Boiling Water Reactor II (ABWR-II)
Status report 98 - Advanced Boiling Water Reactor II (ABWR-II) Overview Full name Acronym Reactor type Coolant Moderator Neutron spectrum Thermal capacity Gross Electrical capacity Design status Designers
More informationChemical Engineering 693R
Chemical Engineering 693R Reactor Design and Analysis Lecture 11 Nuclear Safety Spiritual Thought 2 2 Kings 6:16 And he answered, Fear not: for they that be with us are more than they that be with them.
More informationLessons Learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident and Responses in New Regulatory Requirements
International Experts Meeting on Severe Accident Management in the Light of the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, Vienna, Austria March 17, 2014 Lessons Learned from the Fukushima
More informationSMR/1848-T21b. Course on Natural Circulation Phenomena and Modelling in Water-Cooled Nuclear Reactors June 2007
SMR/1848-T21b Course on Natural Circulation Phenomena and Modelling in Water-Cooled Nuclear Reactors 25-29 June 2007 T21b - Selected Examples of Natural Circulation for Small Break LOCA and Som Severe
More informationI have now made my own analysis of the Fukushima incident and its relevance to the UK's new nuclear build.
From: John Busby Sent: 09 April 2011 12:08 Subject: The Fukushima incident To: ONR From: John Busby Subject: The Fukushima incident I have now made my own analysis of the Fukushima incident and its relevance
More informationABWR, ESBWR and PRISM. Craig Sawyer Chuck Boardman March 26, 2015
ABWR, ESBWR and PRISM Craig Sawyer Chuck Boardman March 26, 2015 Current Nuclear Products of GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GEH) Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR) Developed jointly by GE, Hitachi and Toshiba
More informationA STRONGLY COUPLED REACTOR CORE ISOLATION COOLING SYSTEM MODEL FOR EXTENDED STATION BLACK-OUT ANALYSES
A STRONGLY COUPLED REACTOR CORE ISOLATION COOLING SYSTEM MODEL FOR EXTENDED STATION BLACK-OUT ANALYSES Haihua Zhao, Ling Zou, Hongbin Zhang, and Richard Martineau Idaho National Laboratory PO BOX 1625,
More informationAnnex I of Technical Volume 1 UNIT 1 SEQUENCE OF EVENTS
Annex I of Technical Volume 1 Colour indication: Main Core Cooling Power/station auxiliary Confinement Reactivity 2011-03-11 14:46 00:00 (min) Occurrence of earthquake. M9.0 Initiating external. 51:00
More informationPost Fukushima actions in India. Mukesh Singhal, Chief Engineer, Reactor Safety & Analysis Directorate NPCIL
Post Fukushima actions in India Mukesh Singhal, Chief Engineer, Reactor Safety & Analysis Directorate NPCIL 14 th Meeting of IAEA-TWG on advance technologies, IAEA, Vienna, June 18-20, 2013 Presentation
More informationACR-1000: ENHANCED RESPONSE TO SEVERE ACCIDENTS
ACR-1000: ENHANCED RESPONSE TO SEVERE ACCIDENTS Popov, N.K., Santamaura, P., Shapiro, H. and Snell, V.G Atomic Energy of Canada Limited 2251 Speakman Drive, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5K 1B2 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationJoint ICTP-IAEA Essential Knowledge Workshop on Deterministic Safety Analysis and Engineering Aspects Important to Safety. Trieste,12-23 October 2015
Joint ICTP- Essential Knowledge Workshop on Deterministic Safety Analysis and Engineering Aspects Important to Safety Trieste,12-23 October 2015 Safety classification of structures, systems and components
More informationEffect of Nuclear Reactor Accidents on Modern Nuclear Power Plant Design Eric P. Loewen, Ph.D. Past President American Nuclear Society
Effect of Nuclear Reactor Accidents on Modern Nuclear Power Plant Design Eric P. Loewen, Ph.D. Past President American Nuclear Society April 22, 2013 United States Naval Academy Who? Esquire Magazine,
More informationEPR: Steam Generator Tube Rupture analysis in Finland and in France
EPR: Steam Generator Tube Rupture analysis in Finland and in France S. ISRAEL Institut de Radioprotection et de Sureté Nucléaire BP 17 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France Abstract: Different requirements
More informationApplication of MELCOR at GRS Regarding Spent Fuel Pool Analyses and Assessment of SAMG Procedures
Application of MELCOR at GRS Regarding Spent Fuel Pool Analyses and Assessment of SAMG Procedures 7 th Meeting of the European MELCOR User Group March 17, 2015 TRACTEBEL Engineering, Brussels, Belgium
More informationUK ABWR Generic Design Assessment Generic PCSR Chapter 9 : General Description of the Unit (Facility)
Form10/00 Document ID Document Number Revision Number : : : GA91-9101-0101-09000 SE-GD-0136 C Generic Design Assessment Generic PCSR Chapter 9 : General Description of the Unit (Facility) Hitachi-GE Nuclear
More informationAccident Management Guidance for Spent Fuel Pools and Shutdown Conditions
Accident Management Guidance for Spent Fuel Pools and Shutdown Conditions Roy Harter RLH Global Services rlharter@aol.com SAMG-D course, IAEA, Vienna, Austria 19-23 October 2015 IAEA Safety Guide NS-G-2.15
More informationPreliminary Precursor Analysis
Preliminary Precursor Analysis Accident[o P' Sequence g I -i I c o Nce Regu.lato.ry R esa i Indian Point, Unit 2 Manual reactor trip following steam generator tube failure Event Date 02/15/2000 LER 247/00-001
More informationEXTENDED LOSS OF AC POWER (ELAP) ANALYSIS OF KUOSHENG BWR/6 USING MELCOR2.1/SNAP
EXTENDED LOSS OF AC POWER (ELAP) ANALYSIS OF KUOSHENG BWR/6 USING MELCOR2.1/SNAP Yu Chiang 1, Yu-Ting Ku 1, Jong-Rong Wang 2, Shao-Wen Chen 1, Wen-Sheng Hsu 3, Sheng-Shun Wang 4, Jing Chang 1, Chunkuan
More informationModeling and Analysis of In-Vessel Melt Retention and Ex-Vessel Corium Cooling in the U. S.
Modeling and Analysis of In-Vessel Melt Retention and Ex-Vessel Corium Cooling in the U. S. E. L. Fuller, S. Basu, and H. Esmaili Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research United States Nuclear Regulatory
More informationWork Exercises and Case Studies to Write Safety Evaluation Report
Work Exercises and Case Studies to Write Safety Evaluation Report 2013 Contents Considerations for Writing SER Guideline for Case Study Examples of SAR and Regulatory Review Guide Review Exercise Attachment
More informationFukushima-Daiichi - a radiochemical view of the evolving situation in Summer 2011.
Fukushima-Daiichi - a radiochemical view of the evolving situation in Summer 2011. Kath Morris. Research Centre for Radwaste and Decommissioning The University of Manchester With thanks to Dr Edward Blandford,
More informationAccident Progression and Critical Issues During Reactor Accidents - an End User Perspective
Accident Progression and Critical Issues During Reactor Accidents - an End User Perspective International Atomic Energy Agency Vienna, Austria April 20, 2015 Roy Harter Duane Arnold Energy Center US BWR
More informationABSTRACT DESING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF FORCED COOLING TOWERS FOR LOVIISA NPP SAFETY- AND RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL (RHR) COOLING CIRCUITS
ABSTRACT DESING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF FORCED COOLING TOWERS FOR LOVIISA NPP SAFETY- AND RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL (RHR) COOLING CIRCUITS S.Tarkiainen, T.Hyrsky, I.Paavola, A.Teräsvirta Fortum Nuclear and Thermal
More informationOverview of Fukushima accident. Nov. 9, 2011 Orland, Florida
Overview of Fukushima accident Nov. 9, 2011 Orland, Florida Nuclear Power Plants in Japan Japan Nuclear Japan Energy Nuclear Energy Safety Safety Organization Japan Atomic Industrial Forum, Inc. -Tohoku
More informationVerification of the MELCOR Code Against SCDAP/RELAP5 for Severe Accident Analysis
Verification of the Code Against SCDAP/RELAP5 for Severe Accident Analysis Jennifer Johnson COLBERT 1* and Karen VIEROW 2 1 School of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2017,
More information