Ecobalancing analysis of operation period and disposal processes of food industry machines and devices

Transcription

1 HUPLEE - 1st Hungary-Poland-Estonia LCA Seminar Ecobalancing analysis of operation period and disposal processes of food industry machines and devices Jedrzej Kasprzak Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland Institute of Machines and Motor Vehicles 1

2 Contents: 1) Introduction 2) Goal and scope of research 3) Methods 4) Objects 5) Realization and results 6) Conclusions 2

3 Introduction (1) Actual tendencies Legal regulations Ecolabelling i eco-certification certification Difficulties in ecoballancing slight interest of enterprises difficult access to data lack of information However Need for ecological evaluations of technical objects 3

4 Introduction (2) Review summary: environmental analyses mainly concern production processes very few and fragmentary analyses of exploitation and disposal processes, based on the data from production no real exploitation and disposal data used 4

5 Goal and scope (1) Main goal: analysis of environmental impacts resulting from exploitation and related disposal processes, in relation to the food industry machinery representatives 5

6 Goal and scope (2) Goal achievement criteria: quantitative evaluation of the level of environmental impacts of selected food industry machinery representatives, during the operation period and related disposal processes and the determination of impacts sources 6

7 Goal and scope (3) Particular goals: method s application choice of objects of research identification of the constituents of environmental impacts of operation period identification of the constituents of environmental impacts related to disposal processes determination of the conditions for the level of environmental impacts propositions of optimization activities 7

8 8 Methods Methods (1) (1) /- Planning Standardization Allocation /- Objectivity Measurability Completeness /- /- /- Orientation on object Total environmental circulations method Critical volumes method Ecopoints Fecker method Life Cycle Analysis LCA Criterion LCA Life Cycle Assessment of products

9 Methods (2) Environmental impacts categories: 1) Ecosystem quality: ecotoxicity, acid/eutrophistation eutrophistation, land use, 2) Human health: respiration diseases organic, non organic, climate changes, ozone layer depletion, carcinogens, radiation, 3) Natural resources depletion: minerals, fossil fuels. 9

10 Objects (1) Fillers: working in 2 filler lines Exploitation data: exploitation media consumption, spare parts consumption, production value, schedule of repairs and redecorations, failures, service activities Disposal processes related to operation period: real scenarios of disposal of the exploitation media and materials analyzed in: 2001, 2002, 2003,

11 Objects (2) Filler M1 Filler M2 11

12 Realization (1) functional unit hl polish profile of energy production Water 2,1% Industry 5,5% Lignite 34,2% Coal 58,3% 12

13 Realization (2) LCA method, Impacts concerning: 1) media and materials, 2) spare parts Scenario of operation processes prevention inspections system Real scenarios of the disposal of exploitation materials and spare parts used 13

14 Realization (3) Scenario of the disposal of exploitation materials and spare parts used Scenario of disposal processes Way of disposal Recycling [%] Incineration [%] Plastics Rubbers Materials Steels 35 0 Oils and greases Others Landfill [%]

15 Results (1) RESULTS OF ECOBALANCING ANALYSES OF OPERATION PROCESSES 15

16 Results (2) Total impact of both machines in the period Punkty środowiskowe [ ,75 Filler M1 30% 627,96 Filler M2 16

17 Results (3) Impacts of both machines divided into groups of categories ( ) Punkty środowis kowe [ ,12 71,65 448,51 267,07 48,68 312,04 0 Filler M1 Filler M2 Human Health Ecosystems Quality Natural Resources 17

18 Results (4) Comparison of changes of environmental impacts level in particular years ,56 232,56 236,32 222,31 Punkty środowiskowe [ ,09 155,86 158,95 156, Filler M1 Filler M2 18

19 Results (5) Environmental impacts of exploitation media and materials 250,0 200,0 Punkty środowiskowe 150,0 100,0 50,0 94,3 109,5 17,6 66,0 77,3 12,1 95,6 110,7 17,8 65,0 76,5 11,9 90,7 103,2 17,1 58,3 65,7 93,8 17,5 11,0 109,4 65,4 76,9 12,0 0,0 M1 M2 M1 M2 M1 M2 M1 M Zdrowie ludzkie Stan ekosystemów Wyczerpywanie zasobów naturalnych 19

20 Wyniki analiz (6) Environmental impacts of spare parts Punkty środowiskowe [ ,07 6,67 2,71 0,50 2,11 0,44 1,23 0,33 1,01 0,94 0,91 0,20 0,19 3,68 3,22 1,51 2,11 0,12 0,14 0,14 0,78 0,93 0,90 0,88 M1 M2 M1 M2 M1 M2 M1 M Human Health Ecosystems Quality Natural Resources 20

21 Results (7) Environmental impacts of exploitation media and materials of Filler M1 in Punkty środowiskowe ,2 16, ,93 0,305 0,017 0,895 0, ,226 0,0108 0, , ,0203 0, ,297 0, ,664 0, ,978 0, ,55 0,0332 0,135 0,00642 Energy Oil Optilet Silicone Grease Olista Longtime 2 Grease Paraliq GTE Water Aluminium spray NaOH Human Health Ecosystems Quality Natural Resources 21

22 Results (8) Environmental impacts of the spare parts of Filler M2 in ,9 0,8 0,7 0,291 Punkty środowiskowe 0,6 0,5 0,4 0,3 0,2 0,1 0 0,046 0,363 0,204 0,502 0,0153 0,0498 0,0208 0,101 0,0237 0,18 0,117 0,0639 0,0659 Stainless Steels Other Steels Plastics Rubbers Others 0,0121 Human Health Ecosystems Quality Natural Resources 22

23 Results (9) Environmental impacts of spare parts of Filler M1 in ,6 1,4 Punkty środowiskowe [ 1,2 1 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0 0,668 0,0977 0,162 0,0683 0,0229 0,569 0,0253 0,0177 0, , ,245 0, ,0288 0,0208 0,0319 Stainless Steels Other Steels Plastics Rubbers Others Human Health Ecosystems Quality Natural Resources 23

24 Results (10) RESULTS OF ECOBALANCING ANALYSES OF DISPOSAL PROCESSES 24

25 Results (11) Total impact of both machines in the period of Filler M1 Filler M2 Punkty środowiskowe [ ,05-137, % 25

26 Results (12) Environmental impacts of both machines in the period of in three groups of categories ,95 1,92 12,59 3,93 Punkty środowiskowe [ Filler M1-78,04 Filler M , Human Health Ecosystems Quality Natural Resources 26

27 Results (13) Environmental impacts of both machines in the period of (exploitation materials and spare parts) ,85 Filler M1-0,47 Filler M2 Punkty środowiskowe [ , ,24 Spare parts Exploitation materials 27

28 Results (14) Environmental impacts of both machines in the period of regarding the way of disposal Punkty środowiskowe [ ,11 6,82 Filler M1 0,24 13,47 Filler M2 0, ,37 Recycling Incineration Landfill 28

29 Results (15) Environmental impacts of exploitation materials in the period of in three groups of categories Punkty środowiskowe ,44 12,5 1,95 3,88 Filler M1-77,7 Filler M2-160 Human Health Ecosystems Quality Natural Resources

30 Results (16) Environmental impacts of materials of the spare parts in the period of in three groups of categories 0,1 0,0663 Punkty środowiskowe [ 0-0,1-0,2-0,3-0,4-0,5-0,04-0,0489 Filler M1-0,32 0,0477 Filler M2-0,6-0,581-0,7 Human Health Ecosystems Quality Natural Resources 30

31 Results (17) Comparison of summary environmental indices of both machines analyzed 30% ,75 846,7 42% 800 Punkty środowiskowe [ % 627,96-70,05-137,69 490, Filler M1 Filler M2 Operation period Disposal Total result 31

32 Conclusions Activities to diminish the negative impacts on environment: possibilities of pro-environmental changes of construction replacement of parts made from materials with high environmental cost (e.g. bronzes) extension of work time of certain elements (e.g. filters) rationalization of management of energy further environmental analyses concerning management of lubricants 32

33 Thank you for attention 33