DRAFT SCOPING REPORT

Transcription

1 DRAFT SCOPING REPORT DIEPSLOOT MIXED USE TOWNSHIP THE REMAINING EXTENT OF PORTIONS 1 AND 6 OF THE FARM DIEPSLOOT 388 JR CITY OF JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY Prepared for: NOVEMBER 2015

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION Context and background Project location Adjacent developments Details of the applicant Details of the EAP Overview of the application process Objectives of the Scoping Process Environmental Impact Assessment Report Phase ACTIVITY DETAILS AND MOTIVATION Details of the proposed activity Infrastructure services Road access and traffic Stormwater drainage Water services Sewerage Electricity supply Listed Activities triggered Motivation for the proposed activity Development Objective Development Objective Development Objective Need and desirability Description of Alternatives Input alternatives Activity alternative Location alternatives Demand alternatives Layout alternatives Status quo / No-go alternatives Reasons for the preferred development alternative LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY CONTEXT The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Act No. 108 of 1996) The National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No.107 of 1998) Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 2

3 3.3 National Environmental Management: Waste Act, 2008 (Act No 59 of 2008) The National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (Act 10 of 2004) The National Water Act, 1998 (Act No.36 of 1998) The National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999) Other policies, plans and guideline documents DESCRIPTION OF THE RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT Physical Environment Climate Air quality Noise Topography Land use Geology Surface water Biological Environment Terrestrial ecology Aquatic ecology Human Environment Socio-economic issues Archaeology and cultural heritage/sites of cultural/historical importance Visual aspects IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY Description of nature and scale of impacts Criteria for rating of impacts Preliminary issues and environmental sensitivities Preliminary identification and assessment of anticipated Impacts PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS Objectives of public participation Identification of I&APs Pre-Scoping Notification Register of I&APs Public participation during Scoping Competent authority s decision on the scoping report PLAN OF STUDY FOR EIA Objectives of the EIA process Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 3

4 7.2 Key tasks during the EIR phase Specialist studies for the EIR Ecological Assessment Wetland delineation and assessment Cultural and Heritage Resources Odour Buffer Zoning Assessment Other specialists inputs Impact Assessment Methodology Public participation during the EIR phase GDARD decision on the application SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION EAP DECLARATION AND UNDERTAKING LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1: Locality Map Appendix 2: Layout Plan Appendix 3: Preliminary Town Planning Memo Appendix 4: Public Participation Information LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Details of the applicant... 7 Table 2: Details of the EAP... 8 Table 3: List of activities triggered Table 4: Nature, extent, duration, probability and significance of impact Table 5: Criteria for rating of impacts Table 6: Preliminary quantification of impacts during the construction phase Table 7: Preliminary quantification of impacts during the operation phase Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 4

5 1.0 INTRODUCTION This section provides some background information pertaining to the proposed activity, details of the applicant, environmental consultant and maps out the application process required to obtain authorisation for the proposed activity. 1.1 Context and background The applicant, Century Property Developments (Pty) Ltd, proposes to develop a mixed-use township comprising residential, a school and related uses. The site originally formed part of the Diepsloot South Development, an area owned by Johannesburg Property Company which was expected to be developed for commercial and business uses including offices, retail and industrial space, as well as residential units, three primary schools, a secondary school and community parks. Part of this larger area has already been sold and is currently being developed for housing purposes. The application site is vacant and is located on The Remaining Extent of Portions 1, and 6 of The Farm Diepsloot 388 JR within the City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality, Gauteng Province. The site also forms part of the southern section of the Diepsloot Nature Reserve which is a municipal reserve for which, according to information at hand; an application to de-proclaim it has already been submitted. To manage the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) application process, the applicant appointed Nali Sustainability Solutions (NSS) an independent Environmental Assessment Practitioner as required by the EIA Regulations, Project location The project is located within the north-western reaches of the City of Johannesburg Metropolitan municipal area in Region A close to Diepsloot. The expansive Diepsloot residential area is located within transitional zone between urban areas of Johannesburg and Tshwane, approximately 30km north of Johannesburg Central Business District (CBD). The Diepsloot Township is bordered to the north by the Mogale/Tshwane Highway (N14), to the east by William Nicol Drive (R511) and the Northern Waste Water Treatment Works to the south. Sub Area 3 within which the site falls consists mainly of the Diepsloot Nature Reserve and the marginalized areas of Diepsloot West and Extensions. The key developmental issues within this area revolve around the need to foster local economic development. The limited number of business sites and key structuring elements (e.g. activity streets and mixed use nodes) are hampering large-scale local economic development. The haphazard proliferation of unregulated small home-based businesses within the marginalised area is also as a result of the above. The remainder of the sub area includes agricultural holdings and farm portions that fall within and outside the Urban Development Boundary. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 5

6 Figure 1: Locality Map 1.3 Adjacent developments The area immediately surrounding the subject property has seen a number of new developments in the recent past. Most emphasise the focus on housing development although there a few high order commercial, business and social infrastructure in the mix. Included in such developments are the following: Steyn City (some residential units, offices and supportive uses); Riversands Development (mixed use development which will consist of Educational facilities, Commercial developments, Retail Uses and Offices with Residential Units further to the south as a future phase). Riverside View Extension 30, 31 and 32 (the application by Valumax for mixed Use adjoining the southern boundary of the application site); Diepsloot Shopping Centre (to the North), and Tanganani (Provincial housing project to the East and North), also called Diepsloot East. Figure 2 below indicates the various key development projects that are currently being planned and developed in the immediate vicinity of the site: Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 6

7 Figure 2: Locality Map 1.4 Details of the applicant Table 1: Details of the applicant Aspect Details Applicant Century Property Development (Pty) Ltd Representative Harm Schreurs Designation Executive Manager Physical address 5 Lynx Road, Treesbank, Midrand Postal address P.O. Box 70406, Bryanston, 2021 Telephone Facsimile address Harm@century.co.za 1.5 Details of the EAP To ensure compliance with the EIA Regulations (2014) promulgated under section 24 (5) of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 NEMA (Act No. 107 of 1998) (NEMA) and environmental best practice, the applicant appointed Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd to manage the Environmental Authorisation process for the proposed project. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 7

8 Table 2: Details of the EAP Aspect Details Name Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd Representative Mr Pirate Ncube Physical Address 65 Country Club Drive, Irene Farm Villages, Centurion Postal Address P Bag X1, Stand 1829, Irene Farm Villages, Centurion, 0045 Other contact details Tel: Fax: ncube.nali@gmail.com or pirate.ncube@mail.com Expertise/experience Vast experience in environmental management land use development. More than 22 years in land use, spatial planning, environmental planning and management encompassing Strategic Environmental Assessments, Environmental Impact Assessments and reviews, development of Environmental Management Plans, Environmental Compliance Monitoring as well as Project Management. Served/s in various decision making bodies including the DFA Tribunal, Environmental Advisory Committee, MEC Appeals Advisory Panel. Qualified Town Planner with Masters in Real Estate and MBA. Assistant EAP Mr Comfort Mthombothi Contact details Tel: Fax: comfort.mthombothi@mail.com Expertise/experience More than 8 years in the environmental management field specialising in the assessment of environmental authorisation applications. Experienced and skilled in environmental planning, Environmental Management Programmes, EIAs and project management. Holds a BA(Geography and Environmental Studies) from the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (2006). To ensure a comprehensive assessment process and availability of requisite information for decision making, NSS appointed a team of experts that are well respected in their fields of expertise to assess the potential environmental impacts that the proposed development may have on the receiving environment. 1.6 Overview of the application process The environmental assessment process is being undertaken in two phases namely: Environmental Scoping Process which includes the notification of the process and commissioning of specialists studies; and The Environmental Impact Assessment Study (EIA) which will result in the Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR) as well as an Environmental Management Programme (EMPr). The EMPr will be compiled based on the findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment Report, and will provide mitigation and management measures for the planning and construction phase of the proposed project. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 8

9 1.7 Objectives of the Scoping Process The objective of the scoping process is to, through a consultative process: a) Identify the relevant policies and legislation relevant to the activity; b) Motivate the need and desirability of the proposed activity,; c) Identify and confirm the preferred activity and technology alternative through an impact and risk assessment and ranking process; d) Identify and confirm the preferred site through a detailed site selection process, which includes an impact and risk assessment process inclusive of cumulative impacts and a ranking process of all the identified alternatives focusing on the geographical, physical, biological, social, economic, and cultural aspects of the environment; e) Identify the key issues to be addressed in the assessment; f) Agree on the level of assessment PRELIMINARY PHASE Submit Application Forms to GDARD- (April 2015) Response by GDARD providing Ref No. Prepare Background Information Document (BID) Undertake Specialist studies Announcement of the application/project SCOPING PHASE Registration of I&AP Prepare Scoping Report Advertise and make available for comment Compile Final Scoping Report and circulate to authorities and Registered I&AP Submit to GDARD for decision GDARD DECISION ON SCOPING REPORT IMPACT ASSESSMENT PHASE Undertake Specialist Studies Compile Draft EIAR and Draft Environmental Management Programme Release Draft EIAR for public and authorities comment Prepare Issues and Responses Report Prepare Final EIR and make available for comment Submit Final EIAR and comments to GDARD COMPETANT AUTHORITY DECISION BY GDARD to be undertaken, including the methodology to be applied, the expertise required as well as the extent of further consultation to be undertaken to determine the impacts and risks the activity will impose on the preferred site through the life of the activity, including the nature, significance, consequences, extent, duration and probability of the impacts to inform the location of the development footprint within the preferred site; and g) Identify suitable measures to avoid, manage or mitigate identified impacts and to determine the extent of the residual risks that need to be managed and monitored. 1.8 Environmental Impact Assessment Report Phase APPEAL PROCESS During the EIA phase, a draft Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR), which takes into account all the identified key issues and associated impacts from the Scoping Phase, together with a draft Environmental Management Programme, which specifies the manner in which proposed mitigation measures are to be implemented, will be developed. The draft EIAR will be made available to register I&APs, including the competent authority to review and comment upon for a period of 30 days. Once the I&AP comments have been integrated into the final EIAR it will be submitted to GDARD for consideration and decision making. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 9

10 2.0 ACTIVITY DETAILS AND MOTIVATION This section provides details of the proposed activity and associated infrastructure as well as the motivation for the proposed development. 2.1 Details of the proposed activity The activity entails establishment of a mixed use township that consist of: Residential School and Associated infrastructure. The final layout plan would be guided by the development constraints and opportunities presented by the site. Included among these are the shape of the land, nature of adjacent land uses, the need for efficiency in land allocation in relation to infrastructure services, specialist and engineering recommendations, the wetland areas, areas of ecological sensitivity and geological constraints, as well as future roads adjacent to but outside of the development area. However, the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and associated specialists studies will inform the final layout. Refer to Figure 4 for the draft layout plan. Figure 3: Layout Plan Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 10

11 2.2 Infrastructure services Road access and traffic According to the Regional Spatial Development Framework, the existing road infrastructure within the region is inadequate to cater for the increased developments at the desired densities, however, developments must be accompanied by road infrastructure upgrades. In line with the proposed Layout Plan, a straightforward and limited internal road network is proposed for the township. The design of the roads will be discussed with the Roads and Stormwater section of the CoJ to ensure compliance with City s design standards for residential/commercial townships. The internal and external streets and stormwater will be taken over by the City of Joburg on completion and the maintenance thereof will be the responsibility of the City Council. To this end, all roads and proposed stormwater infrastructure for the proposed township will comply with the minimum standards and requirements as set out by the municipality. A Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) would be commissioned to investigate the existing and expected future traffic flow conditions on the surrounding road network. The study recommends that, subject to the necessary road upgrades, the proposed township can be supported from a traffic-engineering point of view Stormwater drainage According to the RSDF, an established storm-water system serves the built-up areas of the region. Further densification in the built-up areas may, in certain instances, severely impact on the existing drainage system. Improvement of the system needs to take place in a planned manner. The lack of adequate control measures in the marginalised areas is causing serious problems with storm-water runoff, resulting in flooding and erosion. It must be noted that a stormwater management plan will be designed by the appointed engineers and will form part of the EIA Report Water services The RSDF notes that the City is providing water infrastructure under two programmes: The Water Reservoir Upgrading Programme and the Bulk Water Distribution Programme. In accordance with former a program is being implemented currently to address current (existing) backlogs and to provide additional capacity for future demand. On the latter, an upgrading programme will be initiated in 5 years time to address capacity in these areas. However, a detailed Engineering Services Report which addresses the specifications of water network and connection points required to service the proposed township will be submitted with the EIR. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 11

12 Figure 4: Infrastructure Hotspots Sewerage A detailed Engineering Services Report which addresses the specifications of sewage infrastructure network and connection points required to service the proposed township will be submitted with the EIR Electricity supply According to the RSDF, Eskom supplies the areas in Diepsloot. The status of electricity capacity in the Eskom supplied areas remains unconfirmed. The current networks in many of the rural or low-density agricultural areas were not designed to cater for the high rates of development that are currently occurring in the region. Although legal connections were provided for the new houses built in Diepsloot, a high number of illegal connections still exist in these areas. This raises concerns from both a safety and an investment return perspective. In areas such as Diepsloot and Extensions, less than 25% of power capacity is reached. This means that more work still needs to be done to service these areas. A Report which addresses the specifications of electricity infrastructure network and connection points required to service the proposed township will be submitted with the EIR. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 12

13 GN R. 983 of 4 December 2014 Draft Scoping Report: Diepsloot Mixed Use Township 2.3 Listed Activities triggered In terms of the NEMA EIA Regulations of 2014, the table below presents the list of activities that have to be authorised. Table 3: List of activities triggered No. of Govern. Notice: Activity No (s) Description of each listed activity as per listing notices: 9 The development of infrastructure exceeding 1000 metres in length for the bulk transportation of water or storm water; (i). with an internal diameter of 0,36 metres or more; or (ii). with a peak throughput of 120 litres per second or more, excluding where: (a) such infrastructure is for bulk transportation of water or storm water or storm water drainage inside a road reserve; or (b) where such development will occur within urban areas 10 The development and related of infrastructure exceeding' 1000metres in length for the bulk transportation of sewage, effluent, return water, industrial discharge or slimes- (i). with an internal diameter of 0,36 metres or more; or (ii). with a peak throughput of 120 litres per second or more; excluding where: (a) such infrastructure is for bulk transportation of for the bulk transportation of sewage, effluent, return water, industrial discharge or slimes inside a road reserve; or (b where such development will occur within urban areas 12 The development of: i. ii. iii. bridges exceeding 100 square metres in size; iv. v. vi. bulk storm water outlet structures exceeding 100 square metres in size; vii. viii. ix. x. xi. xii. Infrastructure or structures with a physical footprint of 100 square metres or more; where such construction occurs - (a) within a watercourse; (b) (c) if no setback exists, within 32 metres of a watercourse, measured from the edge of watercourse; - Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 13

14 excluding - (aa) (bb) (cc) (dd) where such development occurs within an urban area; or; (ee) where such development occurs within existing roads or road reserves. 19 The infilling or depositing of any material of more than 5 cubic metres into, or the dredging, excavation, removal or moving of soil, sand, shells, shell grit, pebbles or rock of more than 5 cubic metres from:- (i). a watercourse; (ii). (iii). but excluding where such infilling, depositing, dredging, excavation, removal or moving; (a) (b) is for maintenance purposes undertaken in accordance with a management plan; or (c) falls within the ambit of activity 21 in this Notice, in which case that activity applies. 24 The development of (i). (ii). a road with a reserve wider than 13.5 metres, or where no reserve exists where the road is wider than 8 metres; but excluding (a) roads which are identified and included in activity 27 in LN2 of 2014; or (b) roads where the entire road falls within an urban area. 27 The clearance of an area of 1 hectares or more, but less than 20 ha of indigenous vegetation, except where such clearance of indigenous vegetation is required for (i). the undertaking of a linear activity; or (ii). Maintenance purposes undertaken in accordance with a maintenance management plan. 45 The expansion of infrastructure for the bulk transportation of water or storm water where the existing infrastructure - (i). has an internal diameter of 0,36 metres or more; or (ii). has a peak throughput of 120 litres per second or more, and where: (a) the facility or infrastructure is expanded by more than 1000metres in length; or (b) where the throughput capacity of the facility or infrastructure will be increased by 10% or more; excluding where such expansion - (aa) relates to transportation of water or storm water within a road reserve; Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 14

15 GN R.985 GN R.984 Draft Scoping Report: Diepsloot Mixed Use Township (bb) will occur within an urban area. 46 The expansion and related operation of infrastructure for the bulk transportation of sewage, effluent, process water, return water, industrial discharge or slimes where the existing infrastructure- (i). (ii). has an internal diameter of 0,36 metres or more; or has a peak throughput of 120 litres per second or more and; (a) where the facility or infrastructure is expanded by more than 1000metres in length; or (b) where the throughput capacity of the facility or infrastructure will be increased by 10% or more; excluding where such expansion - (aa) relates to transportation of sewage, effluent, process water, return water, industrial discharge or slimes inside within a road reserve; (bb) will occur within an urban area. 15 The clearance of an area of 20 hectares or more of indigenous vegetation, excluding where such clearance of indigenous vegetation is required for (i). (ii). 27 The development of (i). (ii). (iii). (iv). the undertaking of a linear activity; or Maintenance purposes undertaken in accordance with a maintenance management plan. A national road as defined in section 40 of the South African National Roads Agency Limited and National Roads Act, 1998 (Act No. 7 of 1998); A road administered by a provincial authority; a road with a reserve wider than 30 metres, or A road catering for more than one lane of traffic in both directions; but excluding the development and related operation of a road for which an environmental authorisation was obtained for the route determination in terms of activity 5 in Government Notice 387 of 2006 or activity 18 in Government Notice 545 of 2010, in which case activity 24 in Listing Notice 1 of 2014 applies. 14 The development of (i). (ii). (iii). bridges exceeding 10 square metres in size; (iv). (v). (vi). bulk storm water outlet structures exceeding 10 square metres in size; (vii). (viii). (ix). (x). Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 15

16 (xi). (xii). infrastructure or structures with a physical footprint of 10 square metres or more; where such development occurs (a) within a water course; (b) (c) If no development setback has been established, within 32metres of a water course, measured from the edge of a water course; Excluding the development of infrastructure or structures within existing ports or harbours that will not increase the development footprint of the port or harbour. In Gauteng iv. Sites identified as Critical Biodiversity Areas and Ecological Support (CBA) and Ecological Support Areas (ESA) in the Gauteng Conservation Plan or bioregional plans; 18 The widening of a road by more than 4 metres or the lengthening of a road by more than 1 kilometre. In Gauteng iv. Sites identified as Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) and Ecological Support Areas (ESAs) in the Gauteng Conservation Plan or in bioregional plans; 2.4 Motivation for the proposed activity The developer, a mixed use township development in line with the 3 development objectives of Sub Area 3 as outlined in the Regional Spatial Development Framework Development Objective 1 To ensure socio-economic integration, infrastructure upgrading, consolidation and longterm sustainability of Diepsloot and Extensions by promote the development of a sustainable urban environment in the sub area through: Implement the Diepsloot Development Framework Support the development of different housing typologies, and affordable housing options for a range of income levels. Encourage the provision of community facilities, nodal development, open spaces and economic activity. Encourage mixed land uses in identified areas (as per the relevant frameworks) Development Objective 2 Strengthen the economic growth and social development of Diepsloot. Strengthen the Diepsloot Government Precinct neighbourhood node. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 16

17 Support retail and commercial land uses such as supermarkets, Internet cafés, hair salons, restaurants, chemists, drycleaners, informal trade on designated demarcated sites, offices, medical consulting rooms and any other uses listed in the Diepsloot Government Precinct Urban Development Framework (2008). New developments must illustrate integration with surrounding established developments in the node through elements of design, accessibility and pedestrianisation in the precinct area. Improve pedestrian access through sidewalk upgrading and the introduction of cycle lanes along a 2km radius from the node s core, in line with the approved NMT strategy (2009) Development Objective 3 To enable access to housing and security of tenure in the contained Diepsloot and Extensions through implementation of the current housing development initiatives in support of the de-densification and upgrading of Diepsloot and Extensions. The area consists mainly of the Diepsloot Nature Reserve and the marginalized area of Diepsloot West and Extensions. The key issues within the Diepsloot marginalised area are the need to foster local economic development. The limited number of business sites and key structuring elements (e.g. activity streets and mixed use nodes) are hampering largescale local economic development. The haphazard proliferation of unregulated small homebased businesses within the marginalised area is also as a result of the above. The remainder of the sub area includes agricultural holdings and farm portions that fall within and outside the Urban Development Boundary. A part of the Greater Kyalami Conservancy (GEKCO) falls within this sub area. The formalisation of a large number of informal settlements in the Region, including Kya Sands, Lion Park and Diepsloot is key in the City s plans. The majority of issues facing the region are related to the mushrooming of informal settlements in the largely non-urban sections of the region requiring to be formalised. The incorporation of lower-income housing typologies into the broader urban fabric to directly address the existing spatial inequalities within the region, while providing a range of different housing types for various income groups is crucial and the proposed development serves as one step forward towards attaining these objectives. There is a high level of informality in the marginalized areas that needs to be addressed. Marginalized areas and informal settlements have poor levels of infrastructure, high levels of poverty and unemployment. Development applications in this sub area are to be assessed in accordance with the Diepsloot Development Framework 2020, The Diepsloot Activity Street Framework, the Diepsloot Government Node Precinct and the Diepsloot District Node Framework, which should be read in conjunction with the Growth Management Strategy (GMS). Unless the availability of infrastructure and other bulk services can be confirmed by the relevant MOEs and core departments, applications for densification, land use intensification and /or other uses will not be supported. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 17

18 2.4.4 Need and desirability Diepsloot is a high priority area for public investment according to the RSDF. There are three development objectives for the area as outlined above. It is a densely populated area characterized by fully subsidized government housing and informal settlements. It is home to about people and many of them live in shacks. Most families lack access to basic services such as running water, sewage and rubbish removal. And since the area fall within the transitional zone, the proposed development will also help promote the ideal of compact cities and. Because of urbanisation, Johannesburg has always been attractive to people from all over South Africa and providing housing and basic services for them has always been a tricky exercise. This problem is not only unique to Johannesburg but a common problem in most cities within the developing world. The proposed development will help the City provide suitable hosing and services to people within the Diepsloot area. A more detailed need and desirability statement will be provided once the Township Establishment Memorandum has been finalized and will form part of the final EIR. 2.5 Description of Alternatives The IEM procedure stipulates that the environmental investigation needs to consider feasible alternatives for any proposed development. Therefore, a number of possible proposals or alternatives for accomplishing the same objectives should be identified and investigated. The various alternatives are assessed in terms of both environmental acceptability as well as economic feasibility. The preferred option is to be highlighted and presented to the authorities. The following alternatives are examples of the different kinds of alternatives that may be considered and investigated for a particular development: Input alternatives; Activity alternatives; Location alternatives; Status quo / no-go alternatives; Demand alternatives / Supply alternatives; Scheduling alternatives; and Process alternatives Input alternatives Various types of material can be used for the construction of the township and its associated structures. These include different brick types (face brick, cement brick, etc.), roof types (pitched or flat), finishes (paint colour, external lighting, landscape features, etc.) and road surfacing (asphalt, brick paving). The proposed development should however be Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 18

19 aesthetically pleasing to adjacent landowners and should blend in with surrounding developments. Energy effective building construction and orientation have not been considered to date. However, the following recommendations regarding structural designs are recommended by the environmental consultant: Use of building material that requires excessive amounts of energy to manufacture should be minimised; Use of building material originating from sensitive or scarce environmental resources should be minimised, e.g. no tropical hardwood may be used; Building material should be legally obtained by the supplier, e.g. wood must have been legally harvested, and sand should be obtained only from legal borrow pits and from commercial sources; Building material that can be recycled / reused should be used rather than building material that cannot; Use highly durable building material for parts of the building that is unlikely to be changed during the life of the building (unlikely to change due to e.g. renovation, fashion, changes in family life cycle) is highly recommended; Make use of recycled concrete (green concrete); and Make use of clay blocks for construction of buildings Activity alternative The proposed development aligns with the 3 development objectives of Sub Area 3 as outlined in the Regional Spatial Development Framework and therefore no other activity has been considered or regarded as more desirable for the site Location alternatives No alternative sites have been considered by the proponent, as a contract has been entered into between the owner and developer for the development of this site. Further, the site is contiguous to areas/sites that have been earmarked for a specific development type by the owner. Preliminary investigations concluded that the proposed site is the most suitable due to its ideal location in terms of the requirements for the township and the nature of the proposed uses which are aligned with municipal spatial plans and will ensure that the dangerous situation where most kids from Dipsloot cross a busy road to and from school is corrected. Moreover, the proposed development aligns with the 3 development objectives of Sub Area 3 as outlined in the Regional Spatial Development Framework and therefore no other location could be more desirable and a perfect for this type of development. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 19

20 2.5.4 Demand alternatives Johannesburg has always been attractive to people from all over South Africa and providing housing and basic services for them has always been a challenge. However, this problem is not unique to Johannesburg but common in most cities within the developing world. The proposed development will help the City provide suitable hosing and services to people within the Diepsloot area Layout alternatives Following preliminary ecological and other assessments it was established that a perennial stream is present on the site. Although a detailed wetland assessment has been commissioned preliminary recommendations include that a buffer zone along the wetland areas be observed. The layout will be finalised once all studies have been completed. Further, the position of the school has been predetermined by the requirements of Gautrans that prohibits schools from being located less than 500m from a provincial road Status quo / No-go alternatives One of the options to be considered is no development at all. This entails leaving the site in its present state. The site is currently vacant but being degraded through dumping. Leaving it in its present state would result in the site being unattended, uncontrolled and unmanaged and subject to further degradation (which is already taking place). Possible use of the site for nefarious activities cannot be ruled out. Further, if this development is not approved the site will remain as it is; the wetland and riparian habitats identified on site will be exposed to anthropogenic activities that might ultimately negatively impact these sensitive areas Reasons for the preferred development alternative The proposed development forms part of a larger development precinct identified by government to address the socio-economic conditions of this marginalised region. The proposed uses that include housing and a school with associated infrastructure will alleviate some of the challenges within this area. For instance, the school will ensure safety of most of the students who had to cross the William Nichol to get to the existing school. Important is to note that the proposed uses are aligned with the provisions of the Regional Spatial Development Framework, alternative locations were not considered. Other alternatives stated above which relate mostly to the implementation phase of the project were not assessed in detail.. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 20

21 3.0 LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY CONTEXT This section serves to highlight key legislation and policy framework that has implications on the proposed activity. It must be noted that this list is not exhaustive but notes, at high level, the critical laws and policies that have been considered. 3.1 The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Act No. 108 of 1996) All environmental aspects should be interpreted within the context of the Constitution. The Constitution has enhanced the status of the environment by virtue of the fact that environmental rights have been established (Section 24) and because other rights created in the Bill of Rights may impact on environmental management. An objective of local government is to provide a safe and healthy environment (Section 152) and public administration must be accountable, transparent and encourage participation. Implications for the proposed development: Obligation to ensure that proposed activity will not result in pollution and/or ecological degradation; Obligation to ensure that where possible conservation is promoted; and Obligation to ensure that the proposed activity is ecologically sustainable, while demonstrating economic and social development. 3.2 The National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No.107 of 1998) The National Environmental Management Act (Act No. 107 of 1998) commonly known as NEMA is South Africa s overarching framework for environmental legislation. The object of NEMA is to provide for operative environmental governance by establishing principles for decision-making on matters affecting the environment, institutions that will promote cooperative governance, and procedures for co-ordinating environmental functions exercised by organs of state. It sets out a number of principles that aim to give effect to the environmental policy of South Africa. These principles are designed to, amongst others, serve as a general framework for environmental planning, as guidelines by reference to which organs of state must exercise their functions and guide other laws concerned with the protection or management of the environment. Chapter 5 of NEMA serves to promote integrated environmental management which must place people and their needs at the forefront of its concerns, and serve their physical, psychological, developmental, cultural and social interests equitably. Development must be socially, environmentally and economically sustainable. Sustainable development therefore requires the consideration of all relevant factors. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 21

22 In terms of the NEMA and the EIA Regulations, 2014, an application for environmental authorisation for certain listed activities must be submitted to either the provincial environmental authority, or the national authority, depending on the types of activities being applied for. The current EIA regulations, GN R.982, GN R.983, GN R.984 and GN R.985, promulgated in terms of Sections 24(5), 24M and 44 of the NEMA commenced on 08 December GN R.983 lists those activities for which a Basic Assessment is required, GN R.984 lists the activities requiring a full EIA (Scoping and Impact Assessment phases) and GN R.985 lists certain activities and competent authorities in specific identified geographical areas. GN R.982 defines the EIA processes that must be undertaken to apply for Environmental Authorisation. The listed activities that are applicable to this project are identified in Section 2 above. Implications for the proposed development The principles espoused in NEMA serve as guidelines for relevant decision makers in ensuring the protection of the environment. Therefore, the proposed development must be consistent with these principles Where this is not possible, deviation from these principles would have to be very strongly motivated; The activity may not take place without the required authorisation; and Both the Scoping and EIA processes will have to be facilitated with the submission of both a Scoping Report and an Environmental Impact Report. 3.3 National Environmental Management: Waste Act, 2008 (Act No 59 of 2008) One of the main objectives of the NEMWA is to reform the law regulating waste management in order to protect health and the environment by providing reasonable measures for the prevention of pollution and ecological degradation and for securing ecologically sustainable development and to provide for: National norms and standards for regulating the management of waste by all spheres of government; Specific waste management measures; The licensing and control of waste management activities; The remediation of contaminated land; to provide for the national waste information system; and Compliance and enforcement; In terms of the NEMWA, certain waste management activities must be licensed and in terms of Section 44 of the Act, the licensing procedure must be integrated with an environmental impact assessment process in accordance with the EIA Regulations promulgated in terms of the NEMA. Government Notice921, which was published in Government Gazette No.37083, on 29 November 2013 and implemented with immediate effect, lists the waste management activities that require licensing. A distinction is made Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 22

23 between Category A and C waste management activities, which require a Basic Assessment, and Category B activities, which require a full EIA (Scoping followed by Impact Assessment). Implications for the current development: Any activities listed in GN 718 of the Waste Act require an EIA. 3.4 The National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (Act 10 of 2004) The Act provides for the management and conservation of South Africa s biodiversity within the framework of the NEMA. This Act allows for the protection of species and ecosystems that warrant national protection, the sustainable use of indigenous biological resources, the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from bio-prospecting involving indigenous biological resources and the establishment and functions of the South African National Biodiversity Institute. Key elements of the Act are: The identification, protection and management of species of high conservation value; The identification, protection and management of ecosystems and areas of high biodiversity value; Biodiversity Initiatives such as the STEP (Subtropical Thicket Ecosystem Plan) and CAPE (Cape Action Plan for People and Environment) may become accepted as bioregional plans and are thus implemented as legislation; Alien invasive species control of which the management responsibility is directed to the landowner; and Section 53 of the Act identifies that any process or activity that is regarded as a threatening process in terms of a threatened ecosystem, requires environmental authorization via a full Environmental Impact Assessment (Government Notice No. 387). Implications for the current development: Areas of high biodiversity need to be protected; Threatened ecosystems identified in the Act require specific assessment; GDARD would have to be contacted in order to obtain a permit to remove any protected indigenous plants. 3.5 The National Water Act, 1998 (Act No.36 of 1998) The National Water Act (The Act) provides for the management of South Africa s water resources. The purpose of the Act is to ensure that the Republic s water resources are protected, used, developed, conserved and controlled. It is concerned with the allocation of equitable access and the conservation of water resources within South Africa. The National Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 23

24 Water Act of 1998 repealed many of the powers and functions of the Water Act of Key provisions include the following: Catchment Areas - Any disturbance to a watercourse such as the construction of a dam or weir type facility requires authorization from the Minister of Water Affairs. Water Supply - Under the National Water Act, a developer is required to obtain the necessary permits for water usage and the disposal of wastewater from the authority responsible for the administration of the Act, namely the Department of Water Affairs (DWA). Any private well or borehole sunk for the abstraction of groundwater has to be reported and registered with the regulatory authority. Wastewater - The National Water Act is the principal piece of South African legislation governing wastewater management. Implications for the proposed development: Any proposed water uses must be specified and registered and/or licensed; Any modifications to drainage lines on site must be investigated in terms of water use requirements; The developers are responsible for taking reasonable measures to prevent pollution of water resources that it owns, controls occupies or uses on the land in question; The developers are required to remedy a situation where pollution of a water resource occurs following an emergency incident and where it is responsible for the incident or owns or is in control of the substance involved; The developers must take all reasonable measures to minimise the impacts of the incident, undertake clean-up procedures, remedy the effects of the incident and take measures as directed by the catchment agency; and Waste created during construction needs to be controlled adequately to negate the impacts on ground and surface water. 3.6 The National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999) The Act aims to promote the good management of the national estate of South Africa. The national estate can include: Places, buildings, structures and equipment of cultural significance; Places to which oral traditions are attached or that are associated with living heritage; Historical settlements and townscapes; Geological sites of scientific or cultural importance; Archaeological and palaeontological sites; Graves and burial grounds, including: o Ancestral graves o Royal graves and graves of traditional leaders Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 24

25 o o o Graves of victims of conflict Graves of individuals designated by the Minister by notice in the Gazette Historical graves and cemeteries Other human remains not covered in terms of the Human Tissue Act, 1983 (Act No 65 of 1983). Sites of significance relating to the history of slavery in South Africa. In terms of Section 38 of the Act, the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) must be notified during the early planning phases of a project for any development that includes the following activities: the construction of a road, wall, powerline, pipeline, canal or other similar form of linear development or barrier exceeding 300m in length any development or other activity which will change the character of a site exceeding m² in extent o involving three or more existing erven or subdivisions thereof o involving three or more erven or divisions thereof which have been consolidated within the past five years o the costs of which will exceed a sum set in terms of regulations by SAHRA or a provincial heritage resources authority the re-zoning of a site exceeding m² in extent, or any other category of development provided for in regulations by SAHRA or a provincial heritage resources authority. Implications for the proposed development: Any artefacts uncovered during the construction phase must be reported to SAHRA; No person may alter or demolish any structure or part of a structure, which is older than 60 years or disturb any archaeological or palaeontological site or grave older than 60 years without a permit issued by the relevant provincial heritage resources authority. The age of the stable building on site needs to be determined; and SAHRA must be informed of the proposed development and provided an opportunity to comment. This may result in the need for a basic heritage assessment. 3.7 Other policies, plans and guideline documents Other policies, municipal plans and guideline documents that are relevant to the project are listed below: Guidelines published in terms of the NEMA EIA Regulations; Electricity Act (Act 41 of 1987); Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (Act 2 of 2000); Civil Aviation Act (Act 13 of 2009) and Civil Aviation Regulations (CAR) of 1997; Civil Aviation Authority Act (Act 40 of 1998); Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 25

26 White Paper on Renewable Energy (2003); Integrated Resource Plan for South Africa (2010); Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act (Act No. 43 of 1983); Land Use Planning Ordinance (Ordinance 15 of 1985); and National Road Traffic Act (Act No. 93 of 1996). Gauteng Employment Growth and Development Strategy Gauteng Provincial Environmental Management Framework Gauteng 2055 (2014) Gauteng C-Plan Version 3.3 City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Open Space System City of Joburg Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2015, 2009 City of Johannesburg Regional Spatial Development Framework Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 26

27 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT This section describes the biophysical and socio-economic environment that may be affected and the baseline conditions which are likely to be affected by the proposed activity. This description has not been informed by any specialist studies undertaken for this assessment but includes information obtained from various literature sources and is described at a level deemed appropriate for a Scoping study. A summary of the affected environment is provided and more detailed studies focused on significant environmental aspects of the development will be provided during the impact assessment phase. The three components to the environment are recognised as: Physical Environment Biological Environment Socio-Economic Environment. Only those elements of the environment that have a direct bearing on the impact assessment process of the project are discussed. The severity of the potential impacts is largely determined by the state of the receiving environment. 4.1 Physical Environment Climate Johannesburg is situated on the Highveld plateau and has a subtropical highland climate. It enjoys a sunny climate with the summer months, (October to April) characterized by hot days followed by afternoon thundershowers and cool evenings, and winter months (May to September) by dry, sunny days followed by cold nights. Temperatures in Johannesburg are usually fairly mild due to the city s high elevation, with an average maximum daytime temperature of 52.6 C, dropping to an average maximum of around 16 C in June. Winter is the sunniest time of the year, with mild days and cool nights, dropping to 4.1 C in June and July. The temperature occasionally drops to below freezing point at night, causing frost. The annual average rainfall is 713 mm and is mostly concentrated during the summer months Air quality Diepsloot, Chartwell, Dainfern and Zevenfontein are key potential receptors identified in close proximity of the Northern Wastewater Treatment Works (WWTW) site which has an impact on the quality of air in the area. Margot Saner and Associates (Pty) Ltd (MS&A) were appointed to conduct an odour assessment to establish the impact of the Works on the proposed Diepsloot Township Establishment Project and to determine appropriate buffer zones around the WWTWs. This Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 27

28 was done applying mathematical air dispersion modeling through the use of available onsite ambient air sampling data and meteorological data. Several scenarios have been created to account for numerous variables and illustrate the effects that these variables would have on the receiving communities. In addition to the WWTW, a landfill site estimated to have a capacity of 10 million cubic meters and a lifespan of 20 years, with initial deposition rates in the region of tonnes per annum, increasing to tonnes per annum was included in the assessment. From these input parameters, it was estimated that at peak emission, near 2030, 3 tonnes per annum of Hydrogen Sulphide will be emitted by the waste body of the landfill. The dispersion model result suggest however that the contribution of the landfill, in relation to the Northern Works Wastewater Treatment Works is minimal, and does not add significantly to both the size and geometric shape of the odour buffer zone. The following recommendations are made: Noise A dedicated weather station should be erected on the Northern WWTW site in order to allow for the collection of site-specific meteorological data. This would permit further refinement of the Odour Buffer Zone. It must be noted that, in the interim, the revised Odour Buffer Zone must be considered an amorphous zone - given the lack of appropriate on-site meteorological data. A more representative (elaborate) emissions inventory be obtained for the Northern WWTW. This would require additional (regular) ambient air sampling in order to provide more reliable results. Consideration could be given to conducting additional off-site ambient Hydrogen sulphide air sampling in order to quantitatively validate the extent and shape of the revised Odour Buffer Zone as well as the odour footprint for the Northern WWTW. The existing baseline noise sources at the project area include: Activities related to the Northern Wastewater Treatment Works (WWTW); Traffic on the access roads; and Construction activities adjacent to the site Sensitive receptors are primarily residential areas close to the sources. However, the receptors are buffered from the site by main roads and open spaces Topography The topography across the site is variable with a 0-5 gradient. According to the C-Plan there is ridge prevalent in about 70% of the site. The landscape consists of moderately undulating Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 28

29 plains and low hills dominated by tall, usually Hyperrhenia hirta dominated, grassland. Soils are described as leached, shallow, coarsely grained, saindy soils poor in nutrients Land use The site is currently vacant but with signs of abuse as indiscriminate dumping has taken place. In the area immediately surrounding the subject properties, the following new developments have been recorded: Steyn City (some residential units, offices and supportive uses); Riversands Development (mix use development which will consist mainly of Educational facilities, Commercial developments, Retail Uses and Offices with Residential Units further to the south as a future phase). Riverside View Extension 30, 31 and 32 (the application by Valumax for mixed Use to the south of our application); Diepsloot Shopping Centre (to the North), and Tanganani (Provincial housing project to the East and North), also called Diepsloot East Geology According to the 1: Geological Map Series of south Africa (Map Sheet 2628), the entire study area is underlain by the Halfway House Granite Formation comprising undifferentiated granites and gneisses and gneiss, migmatite, porphyritic granodicrite to the east. The Halfway Gouse granites typically weather to form sandy soils that allow easy infiltration of rainwater into the soil profile. Plinthic horizons are also very common within these soils and provide an aquitard that supports a perched water table across large portions of the granite landscape. Where this pervhed water table approaches the surface and extends into the top 50 cm of the soil profile the expression of moisture on the soil surface occurs in the form of wetlands characterised by hydrophilic vegetation. Given these conditions the wetlands on Halwfay House granites are dominated by extensive hillslope seepage wetlands. These wetlands are typically only seasonal or even temporary in nature and strongly dependant on rainfall infiltrating into the soil, thereby raising the water table. There are a number of diabase intrusions indicated on the 1: geology maps. Unlike the granites, the weathering products are dark clay rich soils which support tree lines. These dykes exert an influence on the behaviour of both surface and groundwater Surface water The study area is located within Primary Catchment A, the Limpopo River catchment, and more specifically within quaternary catchment A21C which is drained by the Jukskei River. This catchment has been extensively urbanised, especially in its upper reaches. This is likely Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 29

30 to have a significantly impacted runoff from the catchment as well as any receiving water resources. Figure 2: Rivers and wetlands 4.2 Biological Environment Terrestrial ecology The study area is located in the Grassland Biome of South Africa and within the Mesic Highveld Grassland Bioregion. According to the latest vegetation mapping in the country, the specific vegetation type is classified as Egoli Granite Grassland (EGG) (Mucina & Rutherford, 2006). The EGG is mostly restricted to the Gauteng Province and occurs between the northern Johannesburg in the south, Lanseria Airport and Centurion in th north, Muldersdrift in the west and Tembisa in the east. The landscape consists of moderately undulating plains and low hills dominated by tall, usually Hyperrhenia hirta dominated, grassland. Soils are described as leached, shallow, coarsely grained, saindy soils poor in nutrients. Rainfall is strongly seasonal. Common grass species encountered include Aristida canescens, A. Congesta, Cynodon dactylon, Digitaria monodactyla, Eragrostis capensis, E. Chloromelas, E. Curvula, E. Racemosa, Heleropogon contortus, Hyparrhenia hirta, Melinis repens, Monocymbium ceresiforma, Setaria sphacelata, themeda triandra and Tsistachya leucothrix. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 30

31 The vegetation type is currently considered Endangered with only roughly 3% of a target of 24% conserved. Current rates of transformation due to mostly urbanisation threated most of the remaining untransformed areas. A full ecological assessment that fulfils the ecological assessment requirements of the EIA as required in terms of the NEMA (1998), the associated regulations as well as the requirements of the Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (GDARD) as stipulated in the GDARD Requirements for Biodiversity Assessments, 2014 wil be undertaken. All the relevant databases such as the NFEPA, SANBI and GDARD C-Plan V3 will also be considered Floral assessment No red data plant species have been recorded on site. However, a floral assessment will be conducted to determine the existence of any species of conservation concern within the development area Faunal assessments According to the C-Plan, the site is regarded as suitable habitat for red listed mammals, birds and has primary vegetation. An Ecologist has been appointed to verify this and to make recommendations on the implications of these sensitivities on the development of the site. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 31

32 4.2.2 Aquatic ecology There is a well-developed riparian area along the banks of the Jukskei River which forms the southern boundary of the site. Some indigenous trees were also observed on site. According to a recent study conducted for the wider Northern Farms Areas (which include the application site), all the wetland areas are of low/marginal ecological importance and sensitivity. Most have been impacted by historic activities that had resulted in wetland degradation including: a) Cultivation: large areas adjacent to and within the wetlands appear to have been previously cultivated, resulting in changes in runoff characteristics as well as changes in vegetation. These effects are both direct, resulting in vegetation changes as well as indirect by influencing the runoff and sediment transport processes. The net effect has been a reduction in diversity and i9ncreased encroachment by alien invasive plants. b) Irrigation: the wetlands in the western portion of the site have been influenced by irrigation return flows. c) Alien vegetation: most of the areas that were previously cultivated are currently dominated by alien and weedy species. d) Habitat fragmentation: the wetland areas on site have been isolated from each other as a consequence of the construction of the Northern Works and associated infrastructure. e) Infrastructure: the construction of infrastructure within and adjacent the wetlands including wall, fences, stormwater infrastructure and dams. f) Historical sand mining: sand mining and the removal of top soil has altered the movement of water resulting in increased surface runoff and decreased infiltration, while also increasing erosion and sediment transport into the downstream wetlands. 4.3 Human Environment Socio-economic issues The City of Johannesburg regards Diepsloot West and Extensions as a marginalized area. These areas require integration into the broader urban network. The most prominent needs arising from these marginalized areas encompass employment opportunities, business sites and local retail, which has resulted in large scale, unregulated informal trade. As part of the Upgrading of Marginalized Areas Programmes, development frameworks addressing spatial, social and economic inequalities have been prepared. The key issues within this area include the need to foster local economic development. The limited number of business sites and Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 32

33 key structuring elements (e.g. activity streets and mixed use nodes) are hampering largescale local economic development.. The remainder of the sub area includes agricultural holdings and farm portions that fall within and outside the Urban Development Boundary. The RSDF identifies key development objectives relevant for this region. In particular it provides the following objectives and interventions. To ensure socio-economic integration, infrastructure upgrading, consolidation and long-term sustainability of Diepsloot and Extensions. Strengthen the economic growth and social development of Diepsloot. To enable access to housing and security of tenure in the contained Diepsloot and Extensions through implementation of the current housing development initiatives in support of the de-densification and upgrading of Diepsloot and Extensions. The RSDF identifies a number of opportunities that exist within marginalised areas including that: They are high priority areas in terms of state housing provision. They are high priority areas in terms of municipal infrastructure provision. Informal settlement upgrade is already taking place within both marginalised areas. However, there are opportunities to have various housing typologies and to provide a range of tenure options. There are opportunities to support local economic development. There are possibilities to encourage private sector investment in these areas. Constraints identified within marginalised areas include: The presence of informal settlements. High population densities. Poor sanitation and storm water drainage. The presence of gravel roads. Unregulated small businesses. Limited social and institutional facilities Archaeology and cultural heritage/sites of cultural/historical importance A detailed site investigation will be carried out and the findings will be incorporated in the final EIR Visual aspects Although the topography across the site is variable, the site can be classified as gently. Although a major ridge is present on site according to the C-Plan, the development is not expected to be visually intrusive as the development is aligned with and will blend with surrounding uses and the receptors are not considered to be visually sensitive. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 33

34 5.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY This section provides the generic scope for assessing the significance of impacts related to the key issues raised in the Scoping process. The criterion for determining impact significance has been defined in accordance to the criteria drawn from Appendix 3 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, The levels of details described in the EIA regulations were fine-tuned by assigning specific values to each impact. In order to establish a coherent framework within which all impacts could be objectively assessed, it is necessary to establish a rating system, to be applied consistently to all the criteria. For such purposes each aspect is to be assigned a value ranging from one (1) to four (4) depending on its definition. The tables below provide a summary of the criteria and the rating scales, which will be used in the assessment of potential impacts. 5.1 Description of nature and scale of impacts The table below provides a brief description of the terms used to assess the impact of the proposed activity on the environment. Table 4: Nature, extent, duration, probability and significance of impact Nature: classification of whether the impact is positive or negative, direct or indirect. Extent: spatial scale of impact and classified as: o Site: the impacted area is the whole or significant portion of the site (1). o Local: Within a radius of 2 km of the construction site (2). o Regional: the impacted area extends to the immediate, surrounding and neighbouring properties. o National: the impact can be considered to be of national significance. Duration: Indicates what the lifetime of the impact will be and is classified as: o Short term: The impact will either disappear with mitigation or will be mitigated through natural process in a span shorter than the construction phase. o Medium term: The impact will last for the period of the construction phase, where after it will be entirely negated. o Long term: The impact will continue or last for the entire operational life of the development, but will be mitigated by direct human action or by natural processes thereafter. The only class of impact which will be non-transitory. o Permanent: Mitigation either by man or natural process will not occur in such a way or in such a time span that the impact can be considered transient. Intensity: Describes whether an impact is destructive or benign; o Low: Impact affects the environment in such a way that natural, cultural and social functions and processes are not affected. o Moderate: Affected environment is altered, but natural, cultural and social functions and processes continue albeit in a modified way. o High: Natural, cultural and social functions and processes are altered to extent that they temporarily cease. o Very High: Natural, cultural and social functions and processes are altered to extent that they permanently cease. Probability: Describes the likelihood of an impact actually occurring: o Improbable: Likelihood of the impact materialising is very low o Possible: The impact may occur o Highly Probable: Most likely that the impact will occur o Definite: Impact will certainly occur. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 34

35 Significance: Based on the above criteria the significance of issues was determined. The total number of points scored for each impact indicates the level of significance of the impact, and is rated as: o Low: the impacts are less important. o Medium: the impacts are important and require attention; mitigation is required to reduce the negative impacts. o High: the impacts are of great importance. Mitigation is therefore crucial. Cumulative: In relation to an activity, means the impact of an activity that in itself may not be significant but may become significant when added to the existing and potential impacts eventuating from similar or diverse activities or undertakings in the area. Mitigation: Where negative impacts are identified, mitigation measures (ways of reducing impacts) have been identified. An indication of the degree of success of the potential mitigation measures is given per impact. 5.2 Criteria for rating of impacts This describes the criteria to be used and the significance rating of the impacts. Table 5: Criteria for rating of impacts Criteria for the rating of impacts Criteria Description Extent National Regional Local Site Duration Permanent Long-term Medium-term Short-term Intensity Very high High Moderate Low Probability Definite Highly probable Possible Improbable Points allocation Significance Rating of classified impacts Impact Points Description Low 4-6 A low impact has no permanent impact of significance. Mitigation measures are feasible and are readily instituted as part of a standing design, construction or operating procedure. Medium 7-9 Mitigation is possible with additional design and construction inputs. High The design of the site may be affected. Mitigation and possible remediation are needed during the construction and/or operational phases. The effects of the impact may affect the broader environment. Very high The design of the site may be affected. Mitigation and possible remediation are needed during the construction and/or operational phases. The effects of the impact may affect the broader environment. Status Perceived effect of the impact Positive (+) Beneficial impact Negative (-) Adverse impact Negative impacts are shown with a (-) while positive ones are indicated as (+) 5.3 Preliminary issues and environmental sensitivities The preliminary environmental issues and sensitivities relating to the physical, biological, economic social and institutional/legal framework have been identified in the body of the report. The following potential impacts were identified and will be investigated further during the EIR phase: Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 35

36 Ground and surface water; Wetlands, erosion and bank stabilisation; Geology and soils; Ecological assessment including fauna and flora; Topography and visual impacts; Socio-economic issues, such as employment creation, economic viability and other social impacts including security; Waste generation and management; Dust and noise impacts; Heritage resources; Engineering services; and Traffic and road access issues Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 36

37 5.4 Preliminary identification and assessment of anticipated Impacts The impacts/aspects (beneficial and adverse) of the proposed activity are identified in the body of the report. The specific preliminary impacts associated with the development on the study area (are identified under each environment of this report), and general construction and operational phase related impacts associated with development are listed in the Table below. Table 6: Preliminary quantification of impacts during the construction phase Environmental Component Potential Impact Physical Impacts Geology and Destabilisation of surface soils geology as a result of excavations Potential erosion, degradation and loss of topsoil due to construction activities as well as stormwater runoff Environmental Significance Score E D I P Total Rating Mitigation Measures All site disturbances must be limited to the areas where structures will be constructed. Cleared areas are effectively stabilised to prevent and control erosion. Excess rocks and boulders that are excavated from the site can be used for erosion protection work on site. Suitable excavated material is to be stockpiled next to excavations for use as backfill. Excess material as a result of excavation and construction rubble must be removed, and appropriately disposed of. Areas susceptible to erosion must be protected by installing the necessary temporary and/or permanent protective materials. Any tunnels or erosion channels developing during the construction period shall be backfilled and compacted, and affected areas restored to proper conditions. Soil stockpiling areas must be sufficiently situated away from the drainage areas. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 37

38 Topography Alteration of topography due to excavations, stockpiling of soil, building material, debris and waste material on site. Stability of slopes Ground and surface water Pollution or Contamination of surface and groundwater due to excavations, spillages, leakage, incorrect storage and handling of chemicals, oils, lubricants, cement, fuels and other hazardous materials Erosion of the banks and wetland pollution Limit excavations to areas required for construction purposes. Avoid placing of stockpiles and other services on areas likely to pose obtrusive visual impact Precautionary measures and design from the engineer must be implemented. Re-vegetation of re-profiled slopes; Temporary stabilisation of slopes using geotextiles; and Installation of gabions and reno mattresses Adequate stormwater drainage should be constructed. Stormwater culverts and drains are to be located and covered with metal grids to prevent blockages; All hazardous substances must be stored on an impervious surface in a designated bunded area able to contain 110% of the total volume of materials stored at any given time. All earth moving vehicles and equipment must be regularly maintained to ensure their integrity and reliability. No repairs may be undertaken beyond the contractor lay-down areas or without precautionary measures implemented. Ensure the establishment of stormwater diversion berms around the contractor laydown area and other potential contaminated areas (e.g. diesel storage tanks or refueling station). Care must be taken to ensure that no contaminated water from the construction site enters the natural watercourse. Preventative measures including establishing sumps from where contaminated water can be either treated in situ or removed to an appropriate waste site. Excess or spilled concrete should be confined within the works area and then removed to a waste site. Stream banks stabilization and prevention of further erosion to be implemented. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 38

39 Air quality Biophysical Impacts Flora Dust pollution on site which would affect adjacent developments as a result of construction activities and vehicles on site. Site clearing for construction activities leading to loss of species diversity and habitat characteristics Fauna Site clearing for construction activities leading to loss of species diversity and habitat characteristics Enforcement and adherence to speed limits on onsite roads to prevent the liberation of dust. Dust suppression measures including regular application of water must be implemented. Water used for this purpose must be used in quantities that will not result in the generation of run-off. All site workers to wear PPE to avoid any exposure to contaminated dust particles Conduct a search and rescue operation for all conservation important plants on the site. This operation should be conducted during the summer period when vegetative and reproductive growth is evident; Appoint an Environmental Control Officer (ECO) prior to commencement of construction phase. Responsibilities should include, but not necessarily be limited to, ensuring adherence to EMP guidelines, guidance of activities, planning, reporting to authorities, etc.; Compile and implement environmental monitoring programme, the aim of which should be ensuring long-term success of rehabilitation and prevention of environmental degradation. Limit site clearing to those areas required for construction at a time Appoint an Environmental Control Officer (ECO) prior to commencement of construction phase to ensure adherence to EMP guidelines, guidance of activities, planning, reporting to authorities, etc; Limit site clearing to those areas required for construction at a time Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 39

40 Sensitive environmenta l areas Construction activities affecting the wetland and the ridge area Socio-economic Impacts Noise pollution Increase in noise pollution due to, excavations, site clearing, construction vehicles and personnel, operation of cement mixer machine, blasting and or drilling Visual Visibility of dust, waste integrity pollution and construction activities from surrounding roads and properties Sites of Destruction of areas or cultural features of cultural significance significance Delineation of the conservation area prior to commencement of construction activities The sensitive drainage line/wetland areas to be fenced off from all construction activities Locate noisy machines and equipment maintenance areas as far away from sensitive receptors as possible All equipment and activities to comply with noise regulations Adherence to acceptable working hours Adherence to Occupational Health and Safety Act Ear protection for workers that may be affected by noise Apply dust control measures diligently, especially on provincial roads Apply recommendations of specialist regarding colour and construction of site structures during the Construction Phase Indigenous plants or trees must be retained where appropriate to provide screens to make the construction site less visually intrusive Lighting on site is to be sufficient for safety and security purposes, but shall not be intrusive to neighbouring residents or disturb wildlife Should any other potentially culturally significant artifacts or graves, etc be found during construction activities all activities should be stopped until an assessment by a Cultural Heritage practitioner has been completed Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 40

41 Safety and security Traffic Increase in crime in the area and increase in squatters on vacant land Migration of job seekers into the area in search of employment Increase in construction traffic Local services Construction activities that utilise local services Inadequate service provision to adjacent properties and Fire malfunctioning of services Uncontrolled fires from cooking and Veld fires Proper management and planning A limited number of workers along with security guards will be allowed to sleep on site, however within a cordoned-off secure area All staff will carry identification, access control will be enforced and the site will be swept and a search will be done each night The development will have 24-hour access control and security. If necessary a Community Liaison Officer can be appointed. The CLO (Community Liaison Officer) to be consulted regarding employment of members of the surrounding communities The access of large trucks will be investigated to provide a suitable access route that does not become a nuisance to existing residents Construction vehicles and activities must aim to avoid peak hour traffic times (weekdays 7-8am and 5-6pm) Establish an all-weather site access and wheel wash or shake down to prevent soil and materials from being trekked onto the road. Security The service fencing, systems barriers are and to signage be designed implemented according to the minimum requirements of, and submitted to the Local authority for approval. No construction activities must commence on site prior to obtaining the necessary approval A designated area shall be assigned for fire making for the construction workers to prevent run-away veld fires do not occur Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 41

42 Employmen t and improved tax base for municipalit y Employment of construction workers Decrease in unemployment and crimes related to unemployment BEE development opportunities Local demand for goods and services Decrease in unemployment and empowerment of local trade and industry Local labour to be used as far as possible for the installation of services and the construction activities; Local training and capacity building programmes; Construction timeframe could be lengthy due to the extent and phased nature of the proposed development Contract requirements to involve BEE companies Local products, goods and services to be utilised as far as possible during the construction phase; Table 7: Preliminary quantification of impacts during the operation phase Environmental Component Physical Impacts Geology and soils Activity Potential Impact Possible soil erosion of the banks of the stream and stormwater discharge points. Environmental Significance Score E D I P Total Rating Mitigation Measures Rehabilitation of the stream banks and proper design and construction of the stormwater discharge points. All surfaces susceptible to erosion shall be covered with a suitable vegetative cover as soon as construction is completed. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 42

43 Ground and surface water Air quality General usage of water (household, industries business, etc). Water pollution. No operational activities should impact on the quantity of groundwater available to surrounding borehole users. Emissions from vehicles and operations affecting ambient air quality Impact of the Waste Water Treatment Works Biophysical Impacts Flora General human interference and impact leading to loss of species diversity and habitat characteristics Fauna General human interference and impact leading to loss of species diversity and habitat characteristics Environmentally Loss of valuable landscape sensitive area or and habitat associated wetland areas wetlands and streams Waste water to be recycled and re-used as far as possible Good monitoring and management measurements to be set in place by facilities managers Adequate measures to be put in place to prevent surface and groundwater contamination of any kind responsibility of civil engineers. All sewage infrastructure is to be maintained and checked at yearly intervals. No French drains allowed Trucks and vehicles to be properly maintained; Operations to meet air quality standards Roads will be paved and thus eliminate dust Locate structures outside of the odour buffer zone Walkways throughout the open spaces and buffer zones will be strategically placed. Landscaping guidelines which include an allowable indigenous vegetation list that attracts fauna is to be formulated and implemented. Minimal to no exotic vegetation will be allowed Walkways throughout the open spaces and buffer zones will be strategically placed. Landscaping guidelines which include an allowable indigenous vegetation list that attracts fauna is to be formulated and implemented. Minimal to no exotic vegetation will be allowed Buffer zone to be fenced off and only walkways that are strategically placed and infrastructure services properly designed and implemented allowed Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 43

44 Socio-economic Impacts Noise pollution Noise from industrial development and road infrastructure on proposed and existing residential areas Visual integrity Higher density development and change in land use Change in sense of place of the specific site, however appropriate and good design will result in an improved urban character and will Sites of cultural significance Safety and security positively enhance the Destruction of areas of cultural/historic significance Active operational phase with residential, and a school leading to a decrease in crime due to the creation of a more secure environment and minimising of vacant land Noise abatement measures proposed by the Noise specialist will be implemented Architectural guidelines (including aspects of roof and wall finishes, colours, heights of buildings, and lighting), as well as Landscape Architectural guidelines (screening, buffering, functioning, aesthetics etc) for the development will be developed to promote the enhancement of this urban area and therefore creating new and valuable places with a modified and positive urban mixed-use sense of place that is vibrant and diverse Should any potentially culturally significant artefacts or graves, etc be found during the operational phase, the development management is to be informed and a Cultural Heritage practitioner is to be contacted to decide on a way forward Security provided via passive surveillance Appropriate environmental design to address safety and security issues (CSIR publication) Good accessibility for emergency and police services Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 44

45 Traffic increase Social infrastructure and Local services Employment and improved tax base for municipality Demand for goods and services Increase of residents and users of the area Additional vehicles on road servicing industrial and commercial uses Availability of services in the area Availability and accessible school for pupils Employment of local workers. Decrease in unemployment and crimes Employment and opportunities for BEE and local companies Increase in demand for local goods and services Decrease in unemployment and empowerment of local trade and industry Increase in service delivery and number of housing units Increase in taxes raised on property All requirements of the municipality to be adhered to All improvements to road infrastructure as recommended by traffic engineer to be adhered to The engineers to ensure that adequate measures are in place for adequate service delivery that does not impact negatively on surrounding areas All requirements of the municipality to be adhered to regarding service reticulation and delivery Provision of a school within easy access with no need to cross busy road Local labour and employees to be made use of as far as possible for all aspects of the operational phase BEE companies to be trained and involved in during the operational phase of the development e.g. Management of retail facilities, maintenance, landscaping, etc Increase in local population and therefore demand for local products, goods and services No mitigation but vibrant community with access to services Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 45

46 6.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS This section provides an overview of the public participation process undertaken to date and that to be undertaken during EIR phase. 6.1 Objectives of public participation The public consultation process is designed to provide information to and receive feedback from interested and affected parties (I&AP).That feedback is in turn fed into the EIA process. This provides organisations and individuals with the opportunity to raise concerns and make comments and suggestions regarding the proposed activity. By being part of the assessment process, stakeholders have the opportunity to influence the Project Layout, design and the Plan of Study for the EIA. The approach to communication with the community is aligned with the principles of the NEMA as elaborated upon in General Notice 657, titled Guideline4: Public Participation (Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, 19 May, 2006), which states that: Public participation process means a process in which potential interested and affected parties (I&APs) are given an opportunity to comment on, or raise issues relevant to specific matters. Public participation is an essential and regulatory requirement for an environmental authorisation process and must be undertaken in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations GNR.982 (December2014). Public participation is a process that is intended to lead to a joint effort by stakeholders, technical specialists, the authorities and the proponent/developer who work together to produce better decisions than if they had acted independently. During the Scoping Phase the public participation process enables Interested and Affected Parties to: Understand the context of the EIA; Become informed and educated about the proposed project and its potential impacts; Raise issues of concern and suggestions for enhanced benefits; Verify that their comments, issues of concern and suggestions have been recorded; Assist in identifying reasonable alternatives; and Contribute relevant local information and traditional knowledge to the environmental impact assessment process. During the EIR phase, the public participation process assists I&AP to: Contribute relevant information and local and traditional knowledge to the environmental impact assessment process; Verifythattheirissuesandsuggestionshavebeenevaluatedandconsideredintheenvironm ental investigations and feedback has been provided; Comment on the findings of the EIA; and Identify further issues of concern from the findings of the EIA. During the decision-making phase the process enables I&AP to be advised of the outcome, i.e. the authority decision and how the decision can be appealed. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 46

47 6.2 Identification of I&APs I&APs were invited to participate in the process through newspaper advertisements, site notices and notification of adjacent land owners/occupiers. The notices requested potential I&APs to submit names and comments on any aspect of the application and/or the scoping report. This process aimed to attract I&APs representing from various sectors of society including: Government (national, provincial and local); Environmental NGOs; Conservation Agencies; Community Representatives and CBOs; Directly affected communities; Business and Commerce. 6.3 Pre-Scoping Notification The process below was undertaken in order to attract potential interested and affected parties as well as government departments that administer laws that might impact on the activity, the following was undertaken: Advertising in a local newspaper notifying potential interested and affected parties to register and to submit comments on the proposed activity; Distribution of notices to land owners and occupiers adjacent to the site notifying them of the proposed activity; Distributing notifications to government departments; Notifying the councillor of the area about the proposed project; Affixing site notices within and at the boundaries of the site to notify potential interested and affected parties of the proposed activity. Inviting potential I&AP as well as government departments to access the website for additional information. 6.4 Register of I&APs The NEMA Regulations (GNR.982) distinguishes between I&APs and registered I&APs. The former, as contemplated in NEMA include: (a) any person, group of persons or organisation interested in or affected by an activity; and (b) any organ of state that may have jurisdiction over any aspect of the activity. However, RI&AP is an I&AP whose name is recorded in the register opened for an application. In terms of the Regulations an EAP must open and maintain a register which contains the names, contact details and addresses of: (a) All persons who have submitted written comments or attended meetings with the applicant or EAP; (b) All persons who have in writing requested the applicant or EAP managing the application, for their names to be placed on the register; and (c) All organs of state which have jurisdiction in respect of the activity to which the application relates. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 47

48 Following the notification process, a Register for I&APs has been opened. All stakeholders have been invited to review the Draft Scoping Report. As per the EIA Regulations, future consultation during the Impact Assessment phase will only take place with registered I&APs. All stakeholders who were involved in the consultation process will be added to the register as the I&AP register will be updated throughout the EIA process. 6.5 Public participation during Scoping The availability of the Draft Scoping Report (DSR) for public review for 30 days was announced via an advert in a national Newspaper and communication to interested and affected parties including government departments as well as site notices. Briefly, the process involved the following: Newspaper advert in the Citizen Newspaper Distribution of this Draft Scoping Report (DSR) and a letter of invitation to participate to all I&APs; Posted of the DSR on the EAP s website for stakeholders to access/download; Placing of a hard copy of the DSR at the school located close to the study area; Distribution of the DSR government departments and to GDARD at the same time. After expiry of the comment period on the DSR, the comment and responses report will be generated; All comments will be attended to and or incorporated into the Final Scoping Report. The final report would then be made available to the Registered Interested & Affected parties at the same time it is being submitted to GDARD. 6.6 Competent authority s decision on the scoping report According to the Regulations, GDARD is expected to comment on the draft scoping report within 30 days of receipt of the report. Should the report be accepted with or without conditions, the plan of study for environmental impact assessment will be implemented. If the scoping report is considered inadequate, then an opportunity will be provided for the report to be amended to comply with Appendix 2 of the Regulations. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 48

49 7.0 PLAN OF STUDY FOR EIA The Impact Assessment (IA) Phase will follow after the completion of the Scoping Phase (this phase). During the IA phase, specialist studies will be concluded that will inform the impact assessment. Issues raised by I&APs and the physical, biological and socio-economic impacts of the establishment on the area will be examined in detail. In this way stakeholder issues will assist to drive the EIA process. When completed, the findings of the specialist studies will be integrated into a single report, the Draft EIA report, for comment by I&APs and state organs including GDARD. The EIA Report will be finalised by incorporating any additional comments received from I&APs and an Environmental Management Programme (EMPr) will be developed from the findings and recommendations of the impact assessment studies. The Final EIA Report and EMP will be presented to the authorities for decision-making. 7.1 Objectives of the EIA process The objectives of the EIA process, as per the NEMA EIA Regulations 2014 are to, through a consultative process: a) determine the policy and legislative context within which the activity is located and document how the proposed activity complies with and responds to the policy and legislative context; b) describe the need and desirability of the proposed activity, including the need and desirability of the activity in the context of the preferred location; c) identify the location of the development footprint within the preferred site based on an impact and risk assessment process inclusive of cumulative impacts and a ranking process of all the identified development footprint alternatives focusing on the geographical, physical, biological, social, economic, heritage and cultural aspects of the environment; d) determine the nature, significance, consequence, extent, duration and probability of the impacts occurring to inform identified preferred alternatives; and degree to which these impacts can be reversed, may cause irreplaceable loss of resources, and can be avoided, managed or mitigated; e) identify the most ideal location for the activity within the preferred site based on the lowest level of environmental sensitivity identified during the assessment; f) identify, assess, and rank the impacts the activity will impose on the preferred location through the life of the activity; g) identify suitable measures to avoid, manage or mitigate identified impacts; and h) Identify residual risks that need to be managed and monitored. 7.2 Key tasks during the EIR phase The findings of the environmental and socioeconomic baseline information inform the scope of work to be undertaken during the EIAR phase. The plan of study for the EIA will meet the objectives of an EIA report as described above. The key tasks associated with the EIA Phase include: Reviewing the Scoping Report and Plan of Study for EIA comment and subsequent Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 49

50 approval by GDARD; Conducting specialist investigations as required, on the significant issues identified in the Scoping Process; Undertaking a detailed impact assessment process, assessing alternatives, options and potential mitigation measures; Documenting the findings of the Impact Assessment into an Environmental Impact Report (EIR); Compiling a draft environmental management programme (EMPr). The plan of study therefore includes the following: Aspects to be assessed to inform the Environmental Impact Report; A description of the proposed method of assessing the environmental aspects, including aspects to be assessed by specialists; A description of the proposed method of assessing the duration and significance of impacts; An indication of the stages at which the competent authority will be consulted; Particularsofthepublicparticipationprocessthatwillbeconductedduringtheenvironme ntalimpact assessment process; and Adescriptionofthetasksthatwillbeundertakenaspartoftheenvironmentalimpactasses sment process; Identify suitable measures to avoid, reverse, mitigate or manage identified impacts and to determine the extent of the residual risks that need to be managed and monitored. The impact assessment component of the EIA will entail several environmental aspects to be studied as detailed below. Specialists to undertake the studies have been appointed and will be required to deliver their assessment as per the terms of reference for the specialist investigations provided in the NEMA EIA Regulations 2014, Appendix 6 Specialist Reports and as set out below. The description is presented in fairly general terms, but all the issues that need to be addressed by the studies are captured. 7.3 Specialist studies for the EIR Ecological Assessment A full ecological assessment that fulfils the requirements of the EIA in terms of the NEMA (1998) and the associated regulations will be undertaken. The assessment will also be undertaken according to the Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (GDARD) requirements as stipulated in the GDARD Requirements for Biodiversity Assessments, 2014: All relevant databases such as the NFEPA, SANBI and GDARD C-Plan V3 will also be analysed Floral assessment The proposed methodology includes both a desktop review and a field work component. A desktop review of distribution lists (including Red Data species) and available literature will be conducted to guide the field work component. The vegetation type for the study area will be defined according to sources such as Low &Rebelo (1996) and Acocks (1988) and Mucina and Rutherford (2006). Extensive consideration will also be given to Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 50

51 determining the ecological importance and sensitivity (EISC) of the study area according to the SANBI BGIS database, GDARD C-Plan V3.3, among others. The SANBI and PRECIS databases for the QDS will also be consulted and will serve as the reference data to which the field survey will be compared to. The assessment will include a detailed assessment of the proposed development site as well as the surrounding zone of influence. Results will be compared to a suitable reference site if the proposed areas are already significantly disturbed. The field assessment will identify: Various habitat types; A description of each habitat type based on conservation importance and present ecological state ; Floral species associated with each habitat component Focus on sensitive habitat types and associated vulnerability in order to fulfil the requirements of the study; Focus will also be given to identifying areas of severe alien and invader encroachment; Medicinal plant species will also be identified; Veld condition will be quantitatively assessed according to a pre-defined veld condition index and will also be compared to the typical vegetation for the vegetation type of the area according to Mucina& Rutherford (2006); Sensitive areas will be mapped in order to come up with a detailed description of the ecological integrity of each sensitivity zone; An assessment of general impacts as well as cumulative impacts on floral assemblages in the region will also be made. Specific focus will also be given to establishing the presence of RDL and protected plants as listed within the National Forest Act, (Act 84 as amended) and any relevant provincial legislation and guidelines. Attention will also be afforded to applicable legislative requirements regarding permit application Faunal assessments Faunal assemblage will be determined using the following methods: Extensive consideration will be given to determining the ecological importance and sensitivity (EISC) of the study area according to the relevant conservation databases. The relevant databases for the QDS will also be consulted and will serve as the reference data to which field surveys will be compared to; Visual observations of actually occurring species; Identification of evidence of occurrence, e.g. call spoor, droppings etc; Nocturnal studies to identify nocturnal animals in the area may take place if it is deemed necessary; The reports produced will include sensitive habitat types and impacts from habitat disturbance, faunal assemblages at risk (especially avifauna) and an assessment of impacts on migratory routes; An assessment of cumulative impacts on faunal assemblages in the region will also be made, with specific emphasis on avifauna; Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 51

52 The RDSIS index will also be considered in order to quantify the importance of the study area in terms of RDL faunal conservation; Based on the findings a detailed impact assessment on all identified significant risks will take place; and Recommendations on management and mitigation measures (including opportunities and constraints) with regards to the construction and operation of the proposed activities in order to manage and mitigate impacts on the faunal assemblage of the area. The following field assessment methodologies will be followed as deemed necessary: Avifauna: o The Southern African Bird Atlas Project 2 species list for the quarter degree square will be compared with the database of birds identified on the study area during the field surveys. Field surveys will be undertaken utilising a pair of binoculars and birdcall identification techniques will also be utilised during the assessment in order to accurately identify avifaunal species; o Potential biodiversity list; o Habitat evaluation for RDL species and areas of avifaunal importance. o Extensive consideration will be given to impacts on avifaunal ecology with specific mention of impacts on migratory species and migratory corridors. Mammals: o A potential biodiversity list will be compiled from available literature sources; o Short habitat descriptions of all habitat types pertaining to RDL species will be given; o The habitat types will be evaluated for potentially supporting RDL species; o If deemed necessary field assessments will employ trapping techniques (aimed at determining the small mammal species community structure); o The field assessment will identify the presence of various mammalian species through direct (visual observations) and indirect (spoor, burrow and scat identifications); o A species list, detailing their specific conservation status will be compiled from the field observations; o If considered necessary, the survey will be extended to a nocturnal survey to potentially enable augmentation of the data. The use of surveillance techniques such as automated camera traps will then be considered; Herpetofauna: o A complete potential biodiversity list will be provided; o The conservation status of each species listed will be determined; The potential species list in accordance to the habitat availability will also be compiled; The species recorded during the field survey will be listed; Habitat evaluations will be undertaken for suitability for supporting various RDL species recorded from the region; Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 52

53 Identification through call identification and direct observation; Site searches within the various habitat type units will be employed for determining the species community structures within thesite with special mention of searching of target areas including rocky outcrops and wetland areas; Invertebrate assessment: Sweep netting; Direct visual observations; Sweeping for ground dwellers Wetland delineation and assessment A site assessment will be undertaken and the different sections of the features identified within the study area assessed using the following methodology: Delineation of the wetland and riparian features will take place according to DWAF, 2005: A practical Guideline Procedure for the Identification and Delineation of Wetlands and Riparian Zones. Aspects such as soil morphological characteristics, vegetation types and wetness will be used to delineate the various zones of the wetland (permanent and temporary) according to the guidelines. A buffer zone will be allocated to the wetland feature; The wetland classification assessment will be done according the Classification System for Wetlands and other Aquatic Ecosystems in South Africa. User Manual: Inland systems (Olliset al., 2013); The wetland EIS will be defined based on the DWA 1999 method; The wetland services provided by the resources on the subject property will be assessed according to the Method of Kotze et al (2009) in which services to the ecology of the site will be defined and services to the people of the area will be defined; The wetland Health/IHI will be assessed according to the resource directed measures guideline as advocated by Macfarlane et al., (2008) and DWA (2007), respectively; The wetland areas will be mapped according to the ecological sensitivity of each wetland hydrogeomorphic unit in relation to the study area. In addition to the wetland boundaries wetland buffers will be generated as applicable Cultural and Heritage Resources As required in terms of Section 38 of the National Heritage Resources Act 25 of 1999 (NHRA), the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) will be notified of the intended development. A Heritage Impact Assessment which assesses the Cultural Heritage, Archaeology and Palaeontology of the proposed site will be undertaken and report submitted to the commenting authority, South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA). The HIA specialist report will be prepared in terms of Appendix 6 of the NEMA EIA Regulations, An independent heritage specialist will be appointed as per the NHRA. The following tasks will be conducted: Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 53

54 Review of existing heritage information on the site. Site visit of the project area with specific focus on the project footprint. Phase 1 Heritage Impact Assessment Report to be drafted which includes: o A description of the methodology adopted in carrying out the HIA; o Identification of and sensitivities of the site related to the solar development including associated infrastructure; o Identification of any areas to be avoided, including buffers; o Indication of sensitive areas that cannot be avoided and where potentially a destruction permit may need to be applied for should additional middle stone age flakes or other artefacts be discovered in the site assessment; o A map superimposing the activity including the associated structures and infrastructure on the environmental sensitivities of the site including areas to be avoided and buffers. Map will include GPS coordinates of heritage features discovered in the site visit. Additionally the a GPS track will be recorded of the areas viewed in field during the site assessment; o Description of the findings and potential implications of such findings on the impact of the proposed activity, including identified alternatives on the environment; o Any mitigation measures for inclusion in the EMPr; o An conditions for inclusion in the environmental authorisation; o Any monitoring requirements for inclusion in the EMPr or environmental authorisation; o A reasoned opinion as to whether the proposed activity or portions thereof should be authorised; and if the opinion is that the proposed activity or portions thereof should be authorised, any avoidance, management and mitigation measures that should be included in the EMPr; o Description of any consultation process that was undertaken during the course of preparing the HIA; o A summary and copies of any comments received during any consultation process and where applicable all responses thereto; and o Any other information requested by the competent authorities (DEA and SAHRA) Odour Buffer Zoning Assessment As the project site is located near the Northern Works Wastewater Treatment Works, it was deemed essential that the potential impact of the treatment works on the proposed development be determined. In particular, the treatment works are associated with offensive odours which might affect the location of residential and social infrastructure (school) on the proposed site. As a result the findings of a study commissioned to determine the levels and associated buffer related to the oudour will be used. The specific objectives of this study included: Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 54

55 Illustration of the baseline conditions at the proposed site with particular reference to odour; Description of environmental benchmarks selected for the site with particular reference to air quality; Identification of pathways to the proposed site (receptor) including release (emission) points; Initial prioritization and assessment of the potential impacts at the proposed site. Estimation/prediction of emissions and dispersion of priority airborne pollutants (Hydrogen Sulphide) from identified sources using air dispersion and/or quantitative calculations. Establishment of odour footprints and buffer zones using mathematical dispersion models; Recommendations towards long term air quality monitoring plan; Recommendations towards mitigation to minimize release of odour Other specialists inputs Other specialist assessments or inputs to be undertaken and findings incorporated into the EIR include the following: Geotechnical assessment; Engineering services report; Town planning motivation; Traffic impact assessment including roads infrastructure; Electricity infrastructure. 7.4 Impact Assessment Methodology The impact assessment methodology and aspects to be assessed has been discussed in Section 5.0 above. Further, section 5.4 provides details of environmental aspects that have been determined to be significant in terms of the proposed development. In addition preliminary measures to avoid, mitigate or manage the identified impacts have also been presented in the same section. 7.5 Public participation during the EIR phase Public participation during the impact assessment phase of the EIA will entail a review of the findings of the EIA, presented in the Draft EIA and EMP Reports. These reports will be made available for public comment. I&APs will be advised timeously of the availability of these reports and how to obtain them. They will be encouraged to comment either in writing (mail or ) or by telephone. Ample notification of due dates will be provided. All the issues, comments and suggestions raised during the comment period on the Draft EIA Report/EMP will be added to the Comments and Response Report (CRR) that will accompany the Final EIA Report/EMP. The Final EIA Report/EMP will be submitted to the GDARD for a decision about the proposed project. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 55

56 7.6 GDARD decision on the application Once the GDARD has taken a decision on the proposed project, registered I&APs will be notified of this decision and of the opportunity to appeal. This notification will be provided through a letter or to all registered I&APs, summarising the authority s decision and explaining how to lodge an appeal should they wish to. Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 56

57 8.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION The purpose of this report is to provide authorities with sufficient information on the potential impacts of the proposed development, so that an informed decision can be made with regards to the processes and subsequent authorisation of the proposed development. Potential impacts were identified in consultation with I&APs, and preliminary specialist assessment of the site as well as through the technical expertise and experience of the EAP. The construction and operation of a mixed use township comprising residential development, a school and associated infrastrucre can pose various risks to the environment as well as the residents in the vicinity of the development. The issues related to the development were identified, discussed and assessed in terms of various criteria such as extent, duration, intensity and significance. Impacts rated as being of significance (high or medium) include the following: Contamination of soil and surface water as a result of deposition of contaminants during the construction phase. Contamination of surface water as a result of deposition of contaminants during the operational phase. Unstable soil structures and gradual destruction of structures related especially with the construction phase. If all structures on the site are built according to the recommendations made by the geotechnical engineer, no impacts are expected to occur during this phase. Disturbance to the wetland system associated with the Jukskei River. Air pollution caused by dust, smoke and noxious gas emissions. The impact could be reduced to low if mitigation is implemented. Noise impacts from construction vehicles during the construction phase, and from the noise generated by delivery vehicles to the proposed industrial and commercial development. Mitigation measures include possible restrictions on construction times will reduce the significance to low. Impact of the Northern Waste Water Treatment Works located close to the site. The EMPr will be developed as part of the EIA Report, and will be made available to I&APs for review. This Scoping Report was prepared in terms of recognised Integrated Environmental Management procedures and the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process followed is in compliance with the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act 107 of 1998), as amended and the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations of Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 57

58 9.0 EAP DECLARATION AND UNDERTAKING I, Pirate Ncube, hereby confirm that the information provided in this report is correct at the time of compilation and the report was compiled with inputs provided by the applicant and some of the specialists appointed for the project. I hereby also confirm that: All relevant information pertaining to the project has been submitted to potential interested and affected parties; All comments received from I&APs will be attended to and/or included in the final Scoping Report that will be submitted to the GDARD; A record will be kept of any subsequent comments received and submitted with the final EIA. This will be in the form of a Comments and Responses Report (CRR); The Plan of Study for the EIA will be implemented and the findings will be presented in the EIA report.. Signature.. Date Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 58

59 APPENDICES Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 59

60 Bokamoso Environmental Consultants Website: Appendix 1: JPC Land Locality Map Projection Transverse Mercator Datum- Hartebeeshoek 1994 Reference Ellipsoid WGS 1984 Central Meridian -29

61 A RIVERSIDE VIEW EXT / B 5 C RE/ / / / /388 1/ / / / /388 RIVERSIDE VIEW EXT / /388 2/12 1/12 402/ / / /388 RE/ / / / / /388 1/ R/144 1/ RE/152/ R/137 1/ / /158 1/151 SERVITUDE 4100 SERVITUDE SERVITUDE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SERVITUDE SERVITUDE PROPOSED DIEPSLOOT TOWNSHIP SITUATED ON REMAINING EXTENT OF PORTION 6 AND PART OF REMAINING EXTENT OF PORTION 1 OF THE FARM DIEPSLOOT 388-JR TOWNSHIP BOUNDARY REPRESENTED BY THE FIGURE "A-B-C-D- E-F-G-H-J-K-L-M-N-P-A" AND MEASURES 48,8655ha IN EXTENT. LOCAL AUTHORITY: CITY OF JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS AND AREAS ARE APPROXIMATE PENDING FINAL SURVEY. 2. THE CONTOURS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH REGULATION 18(1) OF THE TOWN-PLANNING AND TOWNSHIPS ORDINANCE, CADASTRAL SURVEY DONE BY BRIAN VILJOEN LAND SURVEYOR CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM WG 29 Y CONSTANT=0,00 X CONSTANT= ,00 SERVITUTE NOTES: AMENDMENTS DATE NOTES Oct 2015 Township submission FLOODLINE NOTE: DATE NOTES IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED THAT THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS DIAGRAM IS AFFECTED BY FLOODWATER UP TO THE 50 AND 100 YEAR RECURRENCE INTERVAL EVENT. DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 144 OF THE NATIONAL WATER ACT (ACT 36 OF 1998) NAME SIGNATURE PR NUMBER DIEPSLOOT 388 JR RE1/388-JR RE/5/388 RE6/388-JR 535/ / / / /388 RE/11/ / RE/15/ /388 37/ / / / / / / /388 6 RE/135/388 36/388 38/388 93/ / /407 96/ /388 94/ / /388 6 RE/7/ / / / / / / / / / /388 RE/107/ / / /388 1/214 2/ /407 LOCALITY 7 MAP 530/407 1 : / / / / / / / /388 Appendix 2: Layout Plan 374/ / / / / / / / / /388 18/ / / / /388 DIEPSLOOT 6860/2009 RE/ /388 RE/104/ / / /388 14/61 13/61 12/61 11/61 155/388 10/61 1/210 15/61 9/61 R/213 R/ / /388 16/ /407 24/388 25/61 17/61 26/61 R/210 73/61 R/214 1/213 1/212 72/61 27/61 18/61 24/61 8/61 7/61 71/61 35/61 23/ / /407 74/61 70/61 36/61 19/61 83/61 75/61 22/61 6/61 69/61 37/61 28/ /61 20/ /61 131/388 68/61 21/61 5/ R/208 84/61 82/61 76/61 17/388 RE/151/407 67/61 39/61 85/61 81/61 77/61 33/61 29/61 2/61 3/61 4/ /61 40/61 32/61 1/61 R/202 R/201 1/198 1/197 1/196 R/196 1/29 80/61 87/61 30/61 91/61 78/61 103/61 104/61 105/ F LAND USE K L M J H RE1/388-JR USE ZONE DIEPSLOOT 388 JR G 25m PROPOSED NEW ROAD Erf 1 2,8000ha E Erf 2 5,8321ha u/ha TOTAL N Erf / ,7015ha ERF NUMBERS 1-10 Erf 6 6,0706ha P u/ha 20m PROPOSED NEW ROAD Erf 3 5,3682ha u/ha NO OF ERVEN Erf m² RIDGE ROAD middle of stream A 4463/ SERVITUDE 4449/2010 Erf m² 31/ SERVITUDE 32/2010 SERVITUDE 34/ RE6/388-JR wetland buffer NO OF UNITS EDUCATIONAL 1 1 n/a "RESIDENTIAL 3" (70 units per hectare) PROPOSED NEW ROADS 7 1 n/a PROPOSED NEW ROADS n/a wetland buffer Erf 8 9,9900ha RIDGE ROAD / / TOT. AREA % 2,8000ha 5,73 30,7696ha 62,97 4,7015ha 9,62 10,5944ha 21,68 48,8655ha 100,0 5466/ Erf 4 21 Erf 5 7,2032ha 6,2955ha FRANCOLIN CRESCENT ORCHARD STREET u/ha u/ha W / N S SCALE 1 : m 40m 60m SERVITUDE 1581/ SERVITUDE 1582/2010 SERVITUDE 2601/ PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SERVITUDE 1584/2010 SERVITUDE 1583/2010 CLIENT: DRAWING NO: JOHANNESBURG PROPERTY COMPANY JPCta O 80m VIEW ROAD 2861/ B VIEW ROAD 5 6 C 9 10 DIEPSLOOT AH D A554/ SCHOOL ROAD RE/ /7 SERVITUDE 6143/2005 HIGWAY ROAD 18 37/ / APPLICANT: CENTURY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS (Johann Jordaan) FAX: johann@century.co.za POSTAL ADDRESS: STREET ADDRESS: P.O. Box 4366 Holding 5 Lynx Road Rietvalleirand Treesbank 0174 MIDRAND 6143/2

62 Appendix 3: Preliminary Town Planning Memo Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 62

63 DIEPSLOOT DEVELOPMENT SITUATED ON PART OF THE REMAINING EXTENT OF PORTION 1 AND REMAINING EXTENT OF PORTION 6 OF THE FARM DIEPSLOOT 388-JR INITIAL TOWN PLANNING REPORT CENTURY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS P.O. Box BRYANSTON 2021 Tel No.: (011) Fax No.: johann@century.co.za Ref No.: JPC/prelim memo EIA Date: November 2015 Enquiries: Johann Jordaan

64 Diepsloot Development Initial Town Planning Report 2 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. BACKGROUND OF DEVELOPMENT 3. REGIONAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (RSDF) 4. URBAN EXPANSION SINCE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 6. THE TOWN PLANNING PROCESS

65 Diepsloot Development Initial Town Planning Report 3 1. INTRODUCTION This is a town planning report prepared as background documentation in the public participation of the initial EIA Scoping Process of a proposed Diepsloot development situated on part of Remaining Extent of Portion 1 and Remaining Extent of Portion 6 of the Farm Diepsloot 388-JR. As the multi-disciplinary planning and design process has only recently started, certain key investigations are still required to guide and inform the final development concept. These include environmental-related studies, traffic impact investigations and approval by City of Johannesburg, civil and electrical engineering reports and approval by City of Johannesburg, detailed flood line / wetland determination and public comments on the broad development proposals. Until such time that the above studies have been completed and approved by Council, can layout plans and associated designs be finalised for incorporation into the EIA and township establishment process. 2. BACKGROUND OF DEVELOPMENT The property previously formed part of the Township Establishment application, namely Diepsloot Extension 8 and 12, submitted by Johannesburg Property Company (JPC) which were amended after a portion was sold to Valumax and they have applied for the approval and proclamation of the Townships known as Riverside View Extensions 30, 31 and 32 which is situated south of the flood line and wetland area indicated on our proposed Township Layout Plan. We wish to further amend previous applications to allow for a medium to high density residential township with the inclusion of a Primary School on Remaining Extent of Portion 6 and part of the Remaining Extent of Portion 1 of the Farm Diepsloot 388-JR. 3. REGIONAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (RSDF) Most of the property has been earmarked to develop as a medium residential development with densities between 30 units per hectare and 160 units per hectare as per the current Regional Spatial Development Framework (RSDF). Table 11 of the Spatial Development Framework indicates allowable uses under Zone 1: Medium density residential zone of which the proposed township forms part of. Below is an extract of Table 11 which indicates all residential zones and allows the following uses under Medium - Residential Zone 1: o o Medium and high density residential developments; and Educational and religious community facilities. The table also allows for a maximum height of 4 storeys.

66 Diepsloot Development Initial Town Planning Report 4

67 Diepsloot Development Initial Town Planning Report 5 4. URBAN EXPANSION SINCE 2008 The Central Sub-Region is presently the fastest growing within the City of Johannesburg and attracts large mixed use developments which in turn increase the value of the land within the region. Since the inclusion of the socalled Urban Expansion Zone and the realignment of the Urban Development Boundary to accommodate further growth, township establishment applications for a number of new developments have been submitted. In the area immediately surrounding the subject properties, the following new developments have been recorded: o o o o o Steyn City (some residential units, offices and supportive uses); Riversands Development (mix use development which will consist mainly of Educational facilities, Commercial developments, Retail Uses and Offices with Residential Units further to the south as a future phase). Riverside View Extension 30, 31 and 32 (the application by Valumax for mixed Use to the south of our application); Diepsloot Shopping Centre (to the North), and Tanganani (Provincial housing project to the East and North), also called Diepsloot East. The following diagram indicates the various key development projects that are currently being planned and developed in the immediate vicinity of the site: Figure 1: New Developments in the Sub-Region

68 Diepsloot Development Initial Town Planning Report 6 5. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The development as proposed consist of 5 Residential 3 erven at a density of 70 units per hectare which will allow a total of 2459 units to be developed as per the preliminary design. We also proposed a Primary School and Sport Fields to be developed on Erf 1 being 2,8000ha in extent to allow for the relocation of the existing Primary School situated south of Mnandi Road and east of William Nicol Drive. The locality of the proposed new school will ensure that small children will not have to cross William Nicol Drive and Mnandi Road situated to the west of William Nicol Drive (same side as the existing Diepsloot development). The locality of the current school force children to cross these busy roads, most of the time without parent s supervision. The following uses are therefore proposed: Medium to Higher density Residential units; An Educational use such as a School; Open Space Areas. We propose a partial access (left-in and left-out) from William Nicol Drive (K46) via School Road and full access from William Nicol Drive via the extension of Mnandi / Knopjeslaagte Road. Preliminary discussions with Johannesburg Roads Agency prevail their support of the latter which will be formalised as part of the Traffic Impact Study to be submitted to Johannesburg Roads Agency and Gautrans for approval. The development is envisioned to be developed as a formal low income settlement but with a high quality living environment 6. TOWN PLANNING PROCESS An application for Township Establishment will be prepared on behalf of the owner and once completed and all requirements of the City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality are met; this application will be submitted, advertised and administrated under the Town Planning and Townships Ordinance.

69 Appendix 4: Public Participation Information Newspaper Advert Letter for land and/or adjacent owner notification Public Notice BID Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 63

70 Newspaper Advert Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 64

71 Letter for land and/or adjacent owner notification Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 65

72 PROJECT TITLE: DIEPSLOOT MIXED USE TOWNSHIP Dear Landowner/Tenant 17 November 2015 You are hereby notified in terms of the NEMA EIA Regulations, 2014, that an application for environmental authorisation to allow for a mixed use development (housing, school and associated uses) has been submitted by Century Property Developments to GDARD. Nali Sustainability Solutions, Environmental Assessment Practitioners (EAP), have been appointed to manage the environmental application process. The development is to be located on the Remaining Extent of Portions 1 and 6 of the Farm Diepsloot 388 JR, City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality. In terms of regulation 41, the EAP must, among others, give written notice to occupiers of the site and owners, persons in control of, and occupiers of land adjacent to the site where the activity is or is to be undertaken. As part of the process, the EAP must ensure the opening and maintenance of a register of interested and affected parties who are entitled to comment on all reports or plans submitted to them during the public participation process. As a land owner/tenant/occupier that might be directly affected by the proposed activity, you are hereby notified of the application and that the Scoping Report can be accessed for review at or from the Riversands Primary School. The proposed activity An application is for the establishment of a mixed use township comprising: Residential units School and Associated infrastructure Attached to this notification is the Public Notice providing the site description and relevant details about the proposed development site, the proponent and the applicable legal provisions. You are invited to register as an interested and affected party and to submit any comments or queries, before 11 January 2016 to Nali Sustainability Solutions via pirate.ncube@mail.com or ncube.nali@gmail.com. Regards, Pirate Ncube

73 Public Notice Nali Sustainability Solutions (Pty) Ltd 66

74 APPLICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATION: DIEPSLOOT TOWNSHIP NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORISATION AND AVAILABITY OF THE DRAFT SCOPING REPORT FOR REVIEW IN TERMS OF SECTION 24 OF THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT, 1998 (ACT NO. 107 OF 1998) Notice is hereby given in terms of Regulation No. R 982 published under sections 24(5) and 44 of the National Environment Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998) that an application for Environmental Authorisation has been submitted to the Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development. Project name: Diepsloot Mixed use Township Applicant: Century Property Developments (Pty) Ltd Property description: The Remaining Extent Of Portions 1, 5 And 6 Of The Farm Diepsloot 388 JR and on The Remaining Extent Of The Farm Rietfontein 532 JQ, City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality. Proposed land uses: Mixed use township comprising: Residential School and associated infrastructure Listed Activities: GN R. 983: activities 9, 10, 12, 19, 24, 27, 28, 45, 46; GN R. 984: activities 6, 15 and 27; and GN R. 985, activities 14 and 18. To ensure that you are identified as an Interested and/or Affected Party please submit your name, contact information, interest in the matter and any comments in writing within the stipulated timeframe to: Nali Sustainability Solutions Contact person: Comfort Mthombothi Cell: Fax: comfort.mthombothi@mail.com Pirate Ncube Cell: Fax: ncube.nali@gmail.com The Draft Scoping Report is available for review from 18 November to 11 January Copies have been deposited at the Riversands Primary School. Alternatively the report can be downloaded from: