BENCHMARKING & DISCLOSURE REPORT
|
|
- Hugh Webster
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BENCHMARKING & DISCLOSURE REPORT DRAFT COPY SUBJECT PROPERTY: Property Name: Property Address: Property Type: Gross Square Footage (SF): Office 6 - Pre ECM 69 New Street New York, NY Office - Large (>50,000 SF) 199,692 SF PROJECT NAME: Sample BDR PROJECT NUMBER: BDR1 REPORT DATE: May 15, 2012 (DRAFT) PREPARED FOR: John Doe, Project Manager ABC Property Management - 69 New Street - New York, NY PREPARED BY: Main St - Suite Anytown, CT 06611
2 May 15, 2012 (DRAFT) John Doe ABC Property Management 69 New Street New York, NY Re: Benchmarking & Disclosure Report for the Subject Property Located at 69 New Street, New York, NY Dear John, Attached is XYZ Consulting, Inc's. Benchmarking & Disclosure Report (BDR) for the above referenced subject property. The scope of work for this BDR is intended to benchmark the subject property's energy key performance indicators to its relevant peer groups from a local market to nationwide level. This industry best practice benchmarking analysis provides insight and supports the recommended next steps to identify the energy conservation measures that meet your payback term and ROI requirements while improving the energy performance of the subject property. REPORT PREPARED BY: REPORT REVIEWED BY: Johnny Doe Larry Smith Principal
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction This is where the consultant will draft their executive summary introduction. ENERGY STAR Rating The below chart displays the ENERGY STAR rating for the subject property. ENERGY STAR Rating Property Type: Office (>5,000 SF) Peer Group: Nationwide (498 peer buildings) Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) data is current through December The subject property's most recent Energy Star rating of 65, received in January 2011, is 15 points above the national average and 10 points below the threshold rating of 75 needed to earn an Energy Star label. Peer Building Benchmarking Utility Type Peer Building Benchmarking - Utility Cost Property Type: Peer Group: Subject Property 12 Months Spend Feb 2010 to Jan 2011 Office - Large (>50,000 SF) Same 3-Digit ZIP Code (79 peer buildings) Subject Property Cost per SF ($/SF/yr) Peer Group Benchmark Median Cost per SF ($/SF/yr) Subject Property % Better / (Worse) Than Peer Group Median Subject Property Potential Annual Cost Savings vs Peer Group Median ($/yr) Electricity $865,166 $4.33 / SF $2.83 / SF (53.1%) $300,038 Fuels $120,517 $0.60 / SF $0.71 / SF 15.0% N/A Water/Sewer $19,393 $0.10 / SF $0.18 / SF 46.0% N/A SRS Peer Building Benchmarking data is current through May As compared to its peer buildings median annual electricity cost per square foot, the electricity cost at the subject property is $1.50 / SF more than its peer group. If the performance of the subject property was improved to meet the median electricity performance of its peer group, the subject property has the potential to reduce its annual electricity cost by $300,038. Page 3
4 Key Performance Metric Peer Building Benchmarking - Energy Use Intensity Property Type: Peer Group: Office - Large (>50,000 SF) Same 3-Digit ZIP Code (129 peer buildings) Subject Property 12 Months Total Use per SF Feb 2010 to Jan 2011 Peer Group Benchmark Median Use per SF Subject Property % Better / (Worse) Than Peer Group Median Subject Property Potential Annual Cost Savings vs Peer Group Median ($/yr) Electricity Use Intensity kwh / SF kwh / SF (33.7%) $217,919 Fuels Use Intensity kbtu / SF kbtu / SF 48.1% N/A Energy Use Intensity (EUI) kbtu / SF kbtu / SF (8.1%) $73,722 Water/Sewer Use Intensity gal / SF gal / SF (2.5%) $482 SRS Peer Building Benchmarking data is current through May As compared to its peer buildings median annual electricity use per square foot, the electricity use at the subject property is 4.70 kwh / SF more than its peer group. If the performance of the subject property was improved to meet the median electricity performance of its peer group, the subject property has the potential to reduce its annual electricity cost by $217,919. As compared to its peer buildings median annual energy use per square foot, the energy use at the subject property is 5.83 kwh / SF more than its peer group. If the performance of the subject property was improved to meet the median energy performance of its peer group, the subject property has the potential to reduce its annual energy cost by $73,722. As compared to its peer buildings median annual water/sewer use per square foot, the water/sewer use at the subject property is.51 kwh / SF more than its peer group. If the performance of the subject property was improved to meet the median water/sewer performance of its peer group, the subject property has the potential to reduce its annual water/sewer cost by $482. Conclusions and Recommendations This is where the consultant will draft their conclusions and recommendations narrative. Page 4
5 SUBJECT PROPERTY PROFILE Property Name: Property Address: Property Type: Gross Square Footage (SF): Office 6 - Pre ECM 69 New Street New York, NY Office - Large (>50,000 SF) 199,692 SF Reporting Period: Dec 2008 to Jan 2011 Property Location The maps below display the subject property location. Street Map Aerial Map Page 5
6 Utility Account Summary Subject Property Utilities Utility Account Utility Type Specified Reporting Period Electric Meter 1 Electrical 12/ /2011 Electric Meter 2 Electrical 12/ /2011 Electric Meter 3 Electrical 12/ /2011 Electric Meter 4 Electrical 12/ /2011 Pepco Energy Services Electrical 12/ /2011 Sewer 1 Sewage 12/ /2011 Steam 1 Steam 12/ /2011 Water Meter 1 Water 12/ /2011 Subject Property Profile Discussion This is where the consultant will draft their subject property profile narrative. Page 6
7 UTILITY COST Overall Utility Cost The above chart displays the percentage allocation of utility costs over the last twelve months of the specified reporting period from Feb 2010 to Jan The subject property's total utility costs are allocated between Electrical (86.1%), Water/Sewer (0.6%), Steam (12.0%) and Water/Sewer (1.3%). Historical Energy Cost The above chart displays a comparison of total energy (electric and fuels) cost, on a monthly basis, over the specified reporting period from Dec 2008 to Jan Page 7
8 Historical Electricity Cost The chart above displays a comparison of electricity cost, on a monthly basis, over the specified reporting period from Dec 2008 to Jan Page 8
9 Historical Fuels Cost The chart above displays a comparison of all fuels cost, on a monthly basis, over the specified reporting period from Dec 2008 to Jan Page 9
10 Historical Water/Sewer Cost The above chart displays a comparison of total water/sewer cost, on a monthly basis, over the specified reporting period from Dec 2008 to Jan Utility Cost Discussion This is where the consultant will draft their Utility Cost narrative. PEER BUILDING BENCHMARKING - UTILITY COST To facilitate an industry best practice for benchmarking building energy and sustainability performance, Sustainable Real Estate Solutions, Inc, (SRS) maintains the SRS Peer Building Benchmarking TM database, containing over 120,000 buildings. These buildings, encompassing 15 primary property types and 3.3 billion square feet, consume more than $7.8 billion in annual energy costs and $635 million in annual water/sewer costs. The database is aggregated from multiple private sources, including energy services and property due diligence providers and is current through May To facilitate benchmarking, the subject property's energy and sustainability performance is compared to its peer group's performance distribution (25th percentile, median, 75th percentile) across multiple geographic areas, i.e., ZIP Code, Core Based Statistical Area (CBSA), State, Climate Region and Nationwide. For each subject property under review, the Database is queried with reference to the property type and location. The results are summarized in the following charts and descriptions which include a detailed statistical analysis of energy and sustainability key performance indicators. Page 10
11 Same 3-Digit ZIP Code (98 peer buildings) Energy Cost per SF Peer Group Comparison Property Type: Office - Large (>50,000 SF) Same CBSA Market (148 peer buildings) Same State (62 peer buildings) Same Climate Region (473 peer buildings) Nationwide (1,483 peer buildings) Subject property value for Feb 2010 to Jan 2011 Page 11
12 Same 3-Digit ZIP Code (79 peer buildings) Electric Cost per SF Peer Group Comparison Property Type: Office - Large (>50,000 SF) Same CBSA Market (121 peer buildings) Same State (52 peer buildings) Same Climate Region (439 peer buildings) Nationwide (1,420 peer buildings) Subject property value for Feb 2010 to Jan 2011 Page 12
13 Same 3-Digit ZIP Code (79 peer buildings) Fuels Cost per SF Peer Group Comparison Property Type: Office - Large (>50,000 SF) Same CBSA Market (115 peer buildings) Same State (44 peer buildings) Same Climate Region (202 peer buildings) Nationwide (621 peer buildings) Subject property value for Feb 2010 to Jan 2011 Page 13
14 Same 3-Digit ZIP Code (58 peer buildings) Water/Sewer Cost per SF Peer Group Comparison Property Type: Office - Large (>50,000 SF) Same CBSA Market (93 peer buildings) Same State (51 peer buildings) Same Climate Region (418 peer buildings) Nationwide (1,358 peer buildings) Subject property value for Feb 2010 to Jan 2011 Peer Building Benchmarking - Utility Cost Discussion This is where the consultant will draft their Utility Cost Peer Group Benchmarking narrative. Narrative and analysis. Page 14
15 ENERGY USE Overall Energy Use The above chart displays the percentage allocation of energy use by type over the last twelve months of the specified reporting period from Feb 2010 to Jan The subject property's energy use is allocated between Electrical (81.7%) and Steam (18.3%). Historical Energy Use The above chart displays a comparison of total energy (electric and fuels) usage, on a monthly basis, over the specified reporting period from Dec 2008 to Jan Page 15
16 Historical Electricity Use The chart above displays a comparison of electricity usage, on a monthly basis, over the specified reporting period from Dec 2008 to Jan Page 16
17 Historical Fuels Use The chart above displays a comparison of all fuels usage, on a monthly basis, over the specified reporting period from Dec 2008 to Jan Energy Use Discussion This is where the consultant will draft their Energy Use narrative. PEER BUILDING BENCHMARKING - ENERGY USE INTENSITY To facilitate an industry best practice for benchmarking building energy and sustainability performance, Sustainable Real Estate Solutions, Inc, (SRS) maintains the SRS Peer Building Benchmarking TM database, containing over 120,000 buildings. These buildings, encompassing 15 primary property types and 3.3 billion square feet, consume more than $7.8 billion in annual energy costs and $635 million in annual water/sewer costs. The database is aggregated from multiple private sources, including energy services and property due diligence providers and is current through May To facilitate benchmarking, the subject property's energy and sustainability performance is compared to its peer group's performance distribution (25th percentile, median, 75th percentile) across multiple geographic areas, i.e., ZIP Code, Core Based Statistical Area (CBSA), State, Climate Region and Nationwide. For each subject property under review, the Database is queried with reference to the property type and location. The results are summarized in the following charts and descriptions which include a detailed statistical analysis of energy and sustainability key performance indicators. Page 17
18 Same 3-Digit ZIP Code (129 peer buildings) Energy Use per SF (EUI) Peer Building Comparison Property Type: Office - Large (>50,000 SF) Same CBSA Market (182 peer buildings) Same State (62 peer buildings) Same Climate Region (507 peer buildings) Nationwide (1,483 peer buildings) Subject property value for Feb 2010 to Jan 2011 Page 18
19 Same 3-Digit ZIP Code (122 peer buildings) Electricity Use per SF Peer Group Comparison Property Type: Office - Large (>50,000 SF) Same CBSA Market (173 peer buildings) Same State (52 peer buildings) Same Climate Region (491 peer buildings) Nationwide (1,420 peer buildings) Subject property value for Feb 2010 to Jan 2011 Page 19
20 Same 3-Digit ZIP Code (111 peer buildings) Fuels Use per SF Peer Group Comparison Property Type: Office - Large (>50,000 SF) Same CBSA Market (150 peer buildings) Same State (44 peer buildings) Same Climate Region (237 peer buildings) Nationwide (621 peer buildings) Subject property value for Feb 2010 to Jan 2011 Peer Building Benchmarking - Energy Use Intensity Discussion This is where the consultant will draft their Energy Use Peer Group Benchmarking narrative. Page 20
21 WATER/SEWER USE Historical Water/Sewer Use The above chart displays a comparison of total water/sewer consumption, on a monthly basis, over the specified reporting period. Water/Sewer Use Discussion This is where the consultant will draft their Water/Sewer Use narrative. PEER BUILDING BENCHMARKING - WATER/SEWER USE INTENSITY To facilitate an industry best practice for benchmarking building energy and sustainability performance, Sustainable Real Estate Solutions, Inc, (SRS) maintains the SRS Peer Building Benchmarking TM database, containing over 120,000 buildings. These buildings, encompassing 15 primary property types and 3.3 billion square feet, consume more than $7.8 billion in annual energy costs and $635 million in annual water/sewer costs. The database is aggregated from multiple private sources, including energy services and property due diligence providers and is current through May To facilitate benchmarking, the subject property's energy and sustainability performance is compared to its peer group's performance distribution (25th percentile, median, 75th percentile) across multiple geographic areas, i.e., ZIP Code, Core Based Statistical Area (CBSA), State, Climate Region and Nationwide. For each subject property under review, the Database is queried with reference to the property type and location. The results are summarized in the following charts and descriptions which include a detailed statistical analysis of energy and sustainability key performance indicators. Page 21
22 Same 3-Digit ZIP Code (58 peer buildings) Water Use per SF Peer Group Comparison Property Type: Office - Large (>50,000 SF) Same CBSA Market (93 peer buildings) Same State (51 peer buildings) Same Climate Region (418 peer buildings) Nationwide (1,358 peer buildings) Subject property value for Feb 2010 to Jan 2011 Peer Building Benchmarking - Water/Sewer Use Intensity Discussion This is where the consultant will draft their Water/Sewer Use Peer Group Benchmarking narrative. Page 22
23 PEER BUILDING BENCHMARKING SUMMARY Utility Type Peer Building Benchmarking - Utility Cost Property Type: Peer Group: Subject Property 12 Months Spend Feb 2010 to Jan 2011 Office - Large (>50,000 SF) Same 3-Digit ZIP Code (79 peer buildings) Subject Property Cost per SF ($/SF/yr) Peer Group Benchmark Median Cost per SF ($/SF/yr) Subject Property % Better / (Worse) Than Peer Group Median Subject Property Potential Annual Cost Savings vs Peer Group Median ($/yr) Electricity $865,166 $4.33 / SF $2.83 / SF (53.1%) $300,038 Fuels $120,517 $0.60 / SF $0.71 / SF 15.0% N/A Water/Sewer $19,393 $0.10 / SF $0.18 / SF 46.0% N/A SRS Peer Building Benchmarking data is current through May As compared to its peer buildings median annual electricity cost per square foot, the electricity cost at the subject property is $1.50 / SF more than its peer group. If the performance of the subject property was improved to meet the median electricity performance of its peer group, the subject property has the potential to reduce its annual electricity cost by $300,038. Key Performance Metric Peer Building Benchmarking - Energy Use Intensity Property Type: Peer Group: Office - Large (>50,000 SF) Same 3-Digit ZIP Code (129 peer buildings) Subject Property 12 Months Total Use per SF Feb 2010 to Jan 2011 Peer Group Benchmark Median Use per SF Subject Property % Better / (Worse) Than Peer Group Median Subject Property Potential Annual Cost Savings vs Peer Group Median ($/yr) Electricity Use Intensity kwh / SF kwh / SF (33.7%) $217,919 Fuels Use Intensity kbtu / SF kbtu / SF 48.1% N/A Energy Use Intensity (EUI) kbtu / SF kbtu / SF (8.1%) $73,722 Water/Sewer Use Intensity gal / SF gal / SF (2.5%) $482 SRS Peer Building Benchmarking data is current through May As compared to its peer buildings median annual electricity use per square foot, the electricity use at the subject property is 4.70 kwh / SF more than its peer group. If the performance of the subject property was improved to meet the median electricity performance of its peer group, the subject property has the potential to reduce its annual electricity cost by $217,919. As compared to its peer buildings median annual energy use per square foot, the energy use at the subject property is 5.83 kwh / SF more than its peer group. If the performance of the subject property was improved to meet the median energy performance of its peer group, the subject property has the potential to reduce its annual energy cost by $73,722. Page 23
24 As compared to its peer buildings median annual water/sewer use per square foot, the water/sewer use at the subject property is.51 kwh / SF more than its peer group. If the performance of the subject property was improved to meet the median water/sewer performance of its peer group, the subject property has the potential to reduce its annual water/sewer cost by $482. Peer Building Benchmarking Summary Discussion This is where the consultant will draft their Utility Cost and Energy Use Peer Group Benchmarking narrative. CarbonCheck - Estimated Carbon Emissions Associated with the Subject Property's Energy Use The CarbonCheck table below displays the estimated carbon emissions, total and floor space normalized, associated with the subject property's energy use over the trailing twelve months of the specified reporting period from Feb 2010 to Jan Estimated Carbon Emissions Associated with Subject Property's Energy Use CO2e Emissions (Trailing 12 months from Feb 2010 to Jan 2011) Total Normalized 1, tons lbs/ft2 The methodology used to calculate the estimated carbon emissions associated with the subject property's energy use, which is consistent with the ASTM Building Energy Performance Assessment (BEPA) Standard E , is described below. Carbon Emissions Discussion This is where the consultant will draft their Carbon Emissions narrative. CarbonCheck - Calculation Methodology for the Estimated Carbon Emissions Associated with the Subject Property's Energy Use Carbon emissions represent the amount of carbon dioxide equivalent, CO2e (representing emissions of the combustion-related greenhouse gases (GHGs): carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide) emitted annually to the atmosphere from the combustion of fossil fuels to produce heat and power for the building. Total carbon dioxide equivalent is determined for both direct and indirect emissions. Direct emissions result from the on-site combustion of fuels. Indirect emissions result from off-site combustion of fuels at power plants that, for example, deliver electricity to the building. Page 24
25 If electricity or hot water is generated on site by alternative energy systems, for example, a solar photovoltaic system or wind energy generator technology, such electricity or hot water is not included in determining the building's carbon emissions. If electricity generated on site exceeds the needs of the facility and is sent off site to the local grid, the building's carbon emissions are credited accordingly. A building's total GHG footprint also considers hydrofluorocarbon emissions from air-conditioning and refrigeration units and perfluorocarbon and sulfur hexafluoride emissions typically associated with certain types of industrial processes. Such emissions, however, typically are relatively insignificant in buildings associated with commercial real estate transactions compared to combustion-related GHG emissions and are not included in the carbon emission methodology used in the preparation of this Benchmarking & Disclosure Report. The subject property's carbon emissions, as calculated in the CarbonCheck table below, also does not include carbon emissions associated with businessrelated air travel and automobile commuting by building occupants. Sustainable Real Estate Solutions, Inc's. (SRS) CarbonCheck calculation methodology, which is consistent with the ASTM Building Energy Performance Assessment Standard E methodology, estimates the carbon emissions of the subject property using the building's average source energy use. The subject property's average source energy use includes the building's average site energy use, including both direct energy use (for example, fuel oil or natural gas for heating) and indirect energy use (for example, electricity used for ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, office equipment, or purchased district energy), and for delivered energy (including electricity and district energy), the production, transmission and delivery losses. Direct energy use at the subject property is used to determine the carbon emissions from on-site fuel usage. On-site direct energy use in mmbtu/yr (million BTU/yr) is multiplied by the kg CO2e/mmBTU in the table below. Direct Carbon Emission Factors for Stationary Combustion Utility Type CO2 kg/mmbtu Methane kg/mmbtu Nitrous Oxide kg/mmbtu CO2e kg/mmbtu Electrical Steam Source: U.S. EPA, Climate Leaders Program, Direct Emissions from Stationary Combustion Sources, Appendix B, May CarbonCheck - Indirect Carbon Emissions - Electricity The subject property's average electricity use is used to determine the carbon emissions associated with electricity usage. The CarbonCheck methodology converts annual kwh to annual mmbtu using the conversion factor of mmbtu/kwh and selects the greenhouse gas emission factor (kg CO2e/mmBTU) from the table below for the electricity grid (egrid subregion) based on the subject property location in the table below. An egrid subregion represents a portion of the U.S. power grid that is contained within a single North America Electric Reliability Council (NERC) region that have similar emissions and resource mix characteristics and may be partially isolated by transmission constraints. As an estimation to account for line losses, the CarbonCheck equation multiplies the emission factor by The approximate kilograms of greenhouse gas emissions in CO2e to satisfy the building's annual electricity demand will then be this emission factor multiplied by the building's average electricity use in annual mmbtu. The CarbonCheck calculation, uses data in the table below, based upon fuel mixes that existed at utilities in Page 25
26 Indirect Carbon Emission Factors for Purchased Electricity egrid Subregion CO2 kg/mmbtu Methane kg/mmbtu Nitrous Oxide kg/mmbtu CO2e kg/mmbtu NPCC NYC/Westchester Source: U.S. EPA's Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (egrid), egrid2008 Version 1.1 (updated January 29, 2009 with the complete release of year 2005 data). Data are organized to reflect the owner, operator and electric grid configuration as of October 1, egrid2007v1_1_year05_summarytables.pdf CarbonCheck - District Systems The subject property's average energy use is used to determine the carbon emissions from district system steam or hot water or chilled water in mmbtu. The CarbonCheck equation selects the carbon emission factor (kg CO2e/mmBTU) from the table below and these factors already take into account transmission losses. The approximate kilograms of carbon emissions in CO2e to satisfy the building's annual purchased district steam or hot water or chilled water demand will then be this emission factor multiplied by the average energy use in annual mmbtu. Page 26
27 Indirect Carbon Emission Factors (District Energy) Utility Type CO2e kg/mmbtu Steam Source: Instructions for Form EIA-1605, Voluntary Reporting of Greenhouse Gases, Energy Information Administration, Department of Energy, October 15, Appendix N: Emissions Benchmarks for Purchased Steam and Chilled/Hot Water. CarbonCheck - Alternative Energy Sources There are no carbon emissions resulting from the consumption of electricity produced from alternative energy sources such as on-site photovoltaic or wind generation resources. As such, in the CarbonCheck equation site electricity consumption provided by such sources is multiplied by an emission factor of zero (0) kg CO2e/ mmbtu. Hence, if a building operates entirely using an on-site solar photovoltaic array, it will have no carbon emissions. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS This is where the consultant will draft their Conclusions and Recommendations narrative. Page 27
Greenhouse Gas Emission Factors Info Sheet
Greenhouse Gas Emission Factors Info Sheet Are you putting together a greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory or climate action plan for a business, city, or county? Do you want to estimate the GHG savings associated
More informationSample Energy Benchmarking Report
Sample Energy Benchmarking Report SUBMITTED TO: Name Address City, State, Zip Phone SUBMITTED BY: Sample Program Address City, State, Zip Contact: Name Phone Email March 24 th, 2011 Sponsored by [Utility]
More informationFlorida State Government Carbon Footprint July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007
Florida State Government Carbon Footprint July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007 prepared by Florida Department of Management Services Florida Department of Environmental Protection October 1, 2007 Table of
More informationGreenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory 2015
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory 2015 Introduction Measuring Greenhouse Gas & Climate Impact at Tulane Since 2006, Tulane University has conducted an annual Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions inventory,
More informationPARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 1990 & 2007 CARBON INVENTORY BASELINE ASSESSMENT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY C6 PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 1990 & 2007 CARBON INVENTORY BASELINE ASSESSMENT Executive Summary Park City Municipal Corporation 1990 & 2007 Carbon Inventory Baseline Assessment*
More informationCity of Pasadena Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory
City of Pasadena Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory November 013 Photo Credits Left:Rincon Consultants, Inc. U. Right: Rincon Consultants, Inc. L. Right: http://www.placesonline.com/north_america/united_states/california/pasadena/photo_detail.asp?filename=849_the_rose_bowl_stadium_pasadena
More informationIntroduction and Methodology
Introduction and Methodology Greenhouse gases are gases that trap heat in the atmosphere. The primary greenhouse gases and their sources are: Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ): Principal greenhouse gas; emitted through
More informationAnnual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Update for FY 2016 (October 7, 2016)
Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Update for FY 2016 (October 7, 2016) Background and Overview Bowdoin College committed to become carbon-neutral by the year 2020 and released a detailed implementation
More informationLand Securities Science-Based Carbon Reduction Targets
Land Securities Science-Based Carbon Reduction Targets Methodology Report 4 th March 2016 Carbon Trust Advisory Limited 4th Floor, Dorset House, 27-45 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NT T: +44 (0)20 7170
More informationBenchmarking EPA Portfolio Manager and Energy Star Certification
Benchmarking EPA Portfolio Manager and Energy Star Certification 1 What is Benchmarking? Energy Benchmarking is the practice of comparing any given building to similar buildings for the purpose of evaluating
More informationBullitt Center s Energy Performance
Bullitt Center s Energy Performance Introduction In 2007 Congress created a Zero Net Energy Commercial Buildings Initiative with a goal of achieving a market transition to Zero Net Energy for new commercial
More informationEnergy Benchmarking Report for LaMonte Elementary School Bound Brook, NJ
Energy Benchmarking Report for LaMonte Elementary School Bound Brook, NJ (for the period: March 2007 through February 2009) Prepared by: Background & Findings The New Jersey Clean Energy Program (NJCEP)
More informationReport of Independent Accountants
Report of Independent Accountants To the Board of Directors of VMware, Inc. We have reviewed the accompanying management s assertion, included in Appendix A, that the Metrics identified below 2016 are
More informationGHG Reporting/ Verification - Lessons Learned. August 20, 2013
GHG Reporting/ Verification - Lessons Learned August 20, 2013 Overview Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rules and Methodologies Applicability Thresholds and Dates MassDEP Reporting MassDEP Verification
More informationSustaining Our Operation in a Changing World. Michael Younis October
Sustaining Our Operation in a Changing World Michael Younis October 16 2008 Business Case Energy Consumption Cook Clean Refrigerate Cost Escalation 2 nd largest conversion cost 5.5% CAGR Environmental
More informationCarbon accounting manual
Carbon accounting manual for the calculation of HP s fiscal year 2016 greenhouse gas emissions Copyright 2017 HP Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without
More informationU.S. Emissions
PSEG Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory 2000 2006 U.S. Emissions Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG) 80 Park Plaza Newark, NJ 07102 www.pseg.com October 2007-1- Printed on Recycled Paper Table
More informationEnergy Efficient Environmental Solutions
COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS Energy Efficient Environmental Solutions OUR MISSION It is our goal to maximize our clients competitive edge by improving overall performance and profitability with cost
More informationEA PREREQUISITE 2: MINIMUM ENERGY PERFORMANCE
THRESHOLD ATTEMPTED LEED 29 for New Construction and Major Renovations EA PREREQUISITE 2: MINIMUM ENERGY PERFORMANCE Project # 138123 Jacobs Hall All fields and uploads are required unless otherwise noted.
More informationEnergy Benchmarking Report for Mill Pond Elementary School Lanoka Harbor, NJ
Energy Benchmarking Report for Mill Pond Elementary School Lanoka Harbor, NJ (for the period: January 2006 through December 2008) Prepared by: Background & Findings The New Jersey Clean Energy Program
More informationJapan s National Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Fiscal Year 2013 (Final Figures 1 ) <Executive Summary>
Japan s National Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Fiscal Year 2013 (Final Figures 1 ) Japan s total greenhouse gas emissions in fiscal year* (FY) 2013 2 were 1,408 million tonnes of carbon
More informationYour Family s Carbon Footprint
Your Family s Carbon Footprint Key Concepts: Greenhouse Gas Carbon footprint Carbon dioxide Greenhouse gas Greenhouse effect Methane Nitrous oxide WHAT YOU WILL LEARN 1. You will calculate how much carbon
More informationQualifying Explanatory Statement for PAS 2060 Declaration of Achievement to Carbon Neutrality
SCS Global Services PAS 2060 Qualifying Explanatory Statement Qualifying Explanatory Statement for PAS 2060 Declaration of Achievement to Carbon Neutrality Prepared for: Planet Labs Date Completed: August
More informationEnergy Savings by replacing old facility o Energy savings o Emissions
Dubuque Intermodal Transportation Center Cost / Benefit Analysis Input values used in this analysis are taken from the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) guidance on the preparation of Cost Benefit
More informationCarbon Audit Report for Yau Lee Construction Company Limited
Carbon Audit Report for Yau Lee Construction Company Limited (May 2011 April 2012 and May 2012 April 2013) (Rev 3) Prepared by Business Environment Council Limited 8 July 2013 BEC reference: C2486 TABLE
More informationThe Energy Program Tricycle: Which Wheel Should You Put in Front?
The Energy Program Tricycle: Which Wheel Should You Put in Front? Laurie Gilmer, P.E., CFM, SFP, LEED AP, CxA Conrad Kelso, P.E., CEM Meet our Presenters Laurie Gilmer, P.E., CFM, SFP, LEED AP, CxA Vice
More informationEA July 11, 2017
EA 2017-03 July 11, 2017 A COMPARISON OF ENERGY USE, OPERATING COSTS, AND CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS OF HOME APPLIANCES 2016 UPDATE Introduction Natural gas, electricity, oil, and propane compete in the
More informationLow-Hanging Fruit Simple Steps Toward Energy Effective Building Operations
Low-Hanging Fruit Simple Steps Toward Energy Effective Building Operations Roger Ebbage Northwest Water / Energy Education Institute Lane Community College May 7-9 Enzian Inn - Leavenworth, Washington
More informationMonitoring of Energy Efficiency. Ricky Wong
Monitoring of Energy Efficiency Ricky Wong World energy consumption is expected to almost double in the next 25 years Unique challenges Increasing demand Pollution Global warming Solutions Technologies
More informationBenchmarking Your Building Using ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager
Benchmarking Your Building Using ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager A step-by-step guide to completing an energy and water benchmarking in Portfolio Manager Portfolio Manager help, training webinars, and office
More informationP.O. Box 1276 Westerville, OH (614)
Applying our technical expertise to a more sustainable world Greenhouse Gas Reporting: More Tips & Tricks Andrew D. Shroads, QEP Regional Director, inc. P.O. Box 1276 Westerville, OH 43086 (614) 887-7227
More informationGreenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory of the Centalized Renewable Energy System (CRES) at Nebraska Innovation Campus
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Adam Liska Papers Biological Systems Engineering 2015 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory of the Centalized Renewable Energy
More informationNew York State Department of Environmental Conservation DEC Policy. This policy should be used by DEC staff in their review of an EIS when:
# /Assessing Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Environmental Impact Statements New York State Department of Environmental Conservation DEC Policy Issuing Authority: Office of Air, Energy, and
More informationPSD Background Presentation
PSD Background Presentation May 3 rd 2011 John Holmes 1 Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD): Overview Federal preconstruction permitting applies to new major stationary sources and major modifications
More informationLecture 2: Greenhouse Gases - Basic Background on Atmosphere - GHG Emission and Concentration Rise - California Regulation (AB32)
Lecture 2: Greenhouse Gases - Basic Background on Atmosphere - GHG Emission and Concentration Rise - California Regulation (AB32) METR 113/ENVS 113 Spring Semester 2011 February 15, 2011 Suggested Reading
More informationCHP Savings and Avoided Emissions in Portfolio Standards
CHP Savings and Avoided Emissions in Portfolio Standards R. Neal Elliott, Anna Chittum, Daniel Trombley, and Suzanne Watson, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy ABSTRACT Combined heat and
More informationPartner for Change : Energy
11/8/217 Partner for Change - 218: Energy Practice Greenhealth Awards Probo.CI CEC_HOSPITAL no.35321 Partner for Change - 218: Energy Introduction The generation of energy from fossil fuels emits a range
More informationSBTi Target Submission Form Guidance. TWG-INF-003 Version August 2017
SBTi Target Submission Form Guidance TWG-INF-003 Version 1.1 14 August 2017 SBTi Target Submission Form Guidance General guidance Use of this guidance Please read this document carefully before completing
More informationEnvironment. Submitted to: Submitted by: July Puget Sound Energy Greenhouse Gas Inventory
Environment Submitted to: Submitted by: Puget Sound Energy AECOM Bellevue, WA Seattle, WA 60285724 July 2013 Puget Sound Energy 2012 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Environment Submitted to: Submitted by: Puget
More informationSouth Africa s Grid Emission Factor
South Africa s Grid Emission Factor There is no general agreement on either the methodology for calculating the Grid Emission Factor (GEF) for South Africa s electricity grid, or on the actual number;
More information2015 GHG Emissions Report
INTREN, Inc. 2015 GHG Emissions Report Kiwanda Evans September 1, 2016 Table of Contents Abstract... 2 Program Overview... 3 GHG Emission Charts... 1 2015 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Results & Summary...
More informationGM Energy, Carbon, & Water Management. Al Hildreth, PE, CEM General Motors Company Energy Manager 16-May-2012 SPE Energy team
GM Energy, Carbon, & Water Management Al Hildreth, PE, CEM General Motors Company Energy Manager 16-May-2012 SPE Energy team Energy, Carbon, & Water in Vehicle Manufacturing Resources used to make a Vehicle
More informationEA PREREQUISITE 2: MINIMUM ENERGY PERFORMANCE Project # SFPUC Administration Office Building
LEED 29 for New Construction and Major Renovations EA PREREQUISITE 2: MINIMUM ENERGY PERFORMANCE Project # 1588 SFPUC Administration Office Building All fields and uploads are required unless otherwise
More informationWhat Can California Hope to Achieve from AB32? The Economic Challenges to Implementing a Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cap.
What Can California Hope to Achieve from AB32? The Economic Challenges to Implementing a Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cap Frank A. Wolak Department of Economics Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6072
More informationCity Council Staff Report
City Council Staff Report Subject: Consideration of RESOLUTION 28-2017 ADOPTING NET-ZERO ENERGY PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS Author: Celia Peterson Department: Sustainability Date: October 12, 2017 Type of
More information2015 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND FOOTPRINT REPORT Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited
2015 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND FOOTPRINT REPORT Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited Our Approach to Environmental Sustainability Our environmental sustainability strategy engages each of the retail
More informationLEED Application Guide for Multiple Buildings and On-Campus Building Projects
LEED Application Guide for Multiple Buildings and On-Campus Building Projects For Use with 2009 LEED Rating Systems for Design and Construction and Operations and Maintenance Released October 31, 2011
More informationNokia Siemens Networks Sustainability report Data summary table
Nokia Siemens Networks Sustainability report Data summary table 2011 Nokia Siemens Networks Sustainability report 2011 Data summary table Report section Performance 2011 Performance 2010 Performance 2009
More informationGreen Works Objectives
Green Works Objectives Preserve natural resources (energy, water, ecological) Promote environmentally-friendly lifestyles and business practices Reduce pollution and public health impacts Develop new economies
More informationUnderstanding the Scale of the Problem: US Energy Sources and CO2 Emissions
Understanding the Scale of the Problem: US Energy Sources and CO2 Emissions Pete Wilcoxen Departments of Economics and Public Administration The Maxwell School, Syracuse University BUA/ECS 650/EST 696
More informationEnergy and Climate. Energy and Climate. Summary of Activities and Performance
Energy and Climate Society s patterns of energy use may represent the single greatest environmental impact, with central importance for the economy and consequences for human health. There is a link to
More informationAn Assessment of the Greenhouse Gas Consequences the Proposed Batchelor Magnesium Project
FINAL REPORT An Assessment of the Greenhouse Gas Consequences the Proposed Batchelor Magnesium Project Prepared for Mt Grace Resources Northern Territory, Australia 20 February 2002 48082-002-5067-R001_D
More informationThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2013 Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2013 Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary...4 Background... 6 Inventory Update..8 Greenhouse Gas Inventory....9 Key Metrics.10
More informationCarbon Footprint Protocol
CarbonFree Product Certification Carbon Footprint Protocol The original version of this document was created in 2007 by the Edinburgh Centre for Carbon Management, in conjunction with the Carbonfund.org
More informationClimate Change and Waste Reducing Waste Can Make a Difference
Climate Change and Waste Reducing Waste Can Make a Difference Climate Change and Municipal Solid Waste: Environmental Issues With an Important Underlying Link Rising levels of gases in the Earth s atmosphere
More informationEnergy Reduction Strategy Through 2020
Through 2020 Revised: August 2017 Executive Summary Auburn University is a land, sea and space grant university established in 1856. The university consists of 11,629,000 square feet on 1,840 acres and
More informationSystematic Energy Efficiency. Beyond EE capital From Energy Champions to Everyone Envolved. Mike Molnar 25 August 2010
Systematic Energy Efficiency Beyond EE capital From Energy Champions to Everyone Envolved Mike Molnar 25 August 2010 Diversified Global Company Components Turbochargers Filtration Emissions Fuel Systems
More informationComparing the Carbon Emission Reductions from Various Clean Energy Projects
Comparing the Carbon Emission Reductions from Various Clean Energy Projects NYS Green Building Conference April 15, 2016 Hugh Henderson CDH Energy Corp., Cazenovia, NY Learning Objectives Understand how
More informationConservation & Demand Management Plan
Conservation & Demand Management Plan Nipigon District Memorial Hospital www.ndmh.ca 397-11: Phase 2 2014-07-04 1 Executive Summary The following Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plan is written
More informationCarbon Neutral Program Public Disclosure Summary
National Carbon Offset Standard Carbon Neutral Program Public Disclosure Summary COMPANY NAME: World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) - Australia REPORTING PERIOD: 2016 Declaration To the best of my knowledge,
More informationTHE ASHRAE BUILDING ENERGY LABELING PROGRAM
THE ASHRAE BUILDING ENERGY LABELING PROGRAM William P. Bahnfleth, PhD, PE, FASHRAE, FASME The Pennsylvania State University ASHRAE Illinois Chapter December 11, 2012 Outline Background ASHRAE s Labeling
More informationGlobal Impact Estimation of ISO Energy Management System for Industrial and Service Sectors
LBNL 0000 Global Impact Estimation of ISO 50001 Energy Management System for Industrial and Service Sectors Arian Aghajanzadeh Dr. Peter L. Therkelsen Dr. Prakash Rao Aimee T. McKane Lawrence Berkeley
More informationBenefits of Green Buildings. Government Finance Officers Association of Texas April 2014
Benefits of Green Buildings Government Finance Officers Association of Texas April 2014 Overview LEED History and information General Purpose & Examples LEED Scoring & Benefits City of Irving Projects
More informationWater Vapor from Thermoelectric Power Plants, Does it Impact Climate? DOE/NETL-2008/1319
Water Vapor from Thermoelectric Power Plants, Does it Impact Climate? DOE/NETL-2008/1319 May 2, 2008 1 Water Vapor from Thermoelectric Power Plants, Does it Impact Climate? It is difficult to experimentally
More informationUC Berkeley HVAC Systems
UC Berkeley HVAC Systems Title Case study report: David Brower Center Permalink Authors Bauman, Fred Webster, Tom Dickerhoff, Darryl et al. Publication Date 2011-04-01 Peer reviewed escholarship.org Powered
More information2.2. Energy and Emissions
section 2.2 Corporate Social Responsibility 2016 Environmental Program Energy and Emissions SAS Environmental Management Program assigns top priority to minimizing energy consumption and related emissions
More informationEnvironmental Performance
Environmental Performance Citi s Approach to Environmental Performance Citi recognizes two distinct aspects to the Company s approach to environmental performance. The first involves Citi s practices to
More informationUpdated State-level Greenhouse Gas Emission Coefficients for Electricity Generation
Updated State-level Greenhouse Gas Emission Coefficients for Electricity Generation 1998-2000 Energy Information Administration Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting Energy Information Administration
More informationGoals and objectives in the most recent action plan; The Copenhagen Climate Plan
1. Local contribution to global climate change Present details of the original and/or most recent Action Plan, including any relevant disadvantages or constraints resulting from historical and/or geographical
More informationA guide for businesses. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reporting
A guide for businesses Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reporting Summary Greenhouse Gas (GHG) regulation Global warming became everyone s business when the Climate Change Act (2008) set a goal of reducing the UK
More informationSupply-chain emissions in Japan
Supply-chain emissions in Japan Percentage of Waste Paper pulp 100% 1 2 Supply chain is a flow of business operations in an industry with stages of raw-material procurement, manufacture, transport, sales
More informationThe Social Cost of Carbon
The Social Cost of Carbon Estimating the Benefits of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions EPA and other federal agencies use estimates of the social cost of carbon (SC-CO 2 ) to value the climate impacts
More informationThe first Internet portal dedicated to the carbon footprint of water activities
PRESS FILE www.lifecarbontool.com The first Internet portal dedicated to the carbon footprint of water activities 1. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions: situation and challenges 2. Application to the water
More informationMeasuring School Electronics Energy at Work 1
1 GRADE LEVEL 6-12 TIME NEEDED FOR COMPLETION 2 class periods or 1.5-2 hours STANDARDS LA GLEs and NGSS alignments are found in the Appendix starting on page A-1 MATERIALS 6 energy monitoring devices.
More informationSustainability Planning and Climate Change Considerations
Sustainability Planning and Climate Change Considerations Donald Fournier CEM, LEED-AP, BEAP Historical Climate Source: Ruddiman et al. 2011 The Holocene We are taking a different path than previous 7
More informationA Qualitative Comparison: Carbon Dioxide Emissions From Residential Space & Water Heating Using Propane vs. Electricity
A Qualitative Comparison: Carbon Dioxide Emissions From Residential Space & Water Heating Using Propane vs. Electricity 512.306.0073 PO Box 164350, Austin, TX 78716-4350 info@hbhsystems.com I. Overview
More informationDOD, Climate Change and Energy Background and Initiatives. Bill Van Houten Office of the Secretary of Defense Environmental Management Staff
DOD, Climate Change and Energy Background and Initiatives Bill Van Houten Office of the Secretary of Defense Environmental Management Staff WH CC Agenda Make the US a leader in climate change Ensure 10%
More informationEnergy and Greenhouse Gas Solutions Hawai i Greenhouse Gas Emissions Profile 1990 and January 30, 2009
Energy and Greenhouse Gas Solutions Hawai i Greenhouse Gas Emissions Profile 1990 and 2005 January 30, 2009 University of Hawai i Economic Research Organization 2424 Maile Way, Room 540 Honolulu, Hawai
More informationEnergy Conservation & Demand Management Plan. Municipality of Strathroy-Caradoc
Energy Conservation & Demand Management Plan Energy Conservation & Demand Management Plan 2014-2020 1 Contents Introduction... 2 Goals & Objectives... 3 Overview of Facilities & Usage... 4 Commitment...
More informationCap-and-Trade: The Basics
Cap-and-Trade: The Basics Hewitt Roberts The Delphi Group 9/21/2009 Copyright 2009 The Delphi Group All rights reserved. The use of any part of this publication, whether it is reproduced, stored in a retrieval
More informationEnergy and Atmosphere
The Most! Goals Reduce Energy Use and Support the Use of More Environmentally Friendly Energy Sources Stop Global Warming / Reduce GHG Emissions Eliminate / Reduce Air Pollution EAP1 Fundamental Commissioning
More informationCalifornia s Revised Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Regulation
California s Revised Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Regulation Extended Abstract #65 Y. Anny Huang, Doug Thompson, David Edwards, and Patrick Gaffney California Air Resources Board, 1001 I Street,
More informationSustainable Energy Inventory and Action Matrix
Sustainable Energy Inventory and Action Matrix for the City of Arvada, Colorado Prepared and finalized by: Justin Christenson, IGERT intern Primary Investigators: Dr. Anu Ramaswami, Professor of Civil
More informationREDUCTION OF CARBON FOOTPRINT IS NECESSARY TO SAVE ENVIRONMENT
REDUCTION OF CARBON FOOTPRINT IS NECESSARY TO SAVE ENVIRONMENT Environment protection, Global warming and climate change are most priority of everybody nations, companies and individuals. Reducing carbon
More informationinnovative policy solutions
innovative policy solutions In Brief, Number 3 TO GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE Greenhouse Gas Reporting and Disclosure: Key Elements of a Prospective U.S. Program A mandatory greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting and
More informationDOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS LIVING BUILDING CHALLENGE SM 3.0. January A Visionary Path to a Regenerative Future
DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS January 2015 LIVING BUILDING CHALLENGE SM 3.0 A Visionary Path to a Regenerative Future NET ZERO ENERGY BUILDING DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS LIVING BUILDING CHALLENGE TM 3.0 NZEB
More informationEstates & Facilities Department Property Services. Carbon Management Strategy
Estates & Facilities Department Property Services Carbon Management Strategy 2013-18 Contents Executive summary 1 Introduction 1.1 The climate case 1.2 The business case 2 Regulation and Associated Stakeholders
More informationIn 2011 burning of fossil fuels provided 83% of mankind s energy resource while nuclear electric power provided 9%, and renewable energy 8% (1).
Hierarchy of Global Energy Sources and Related Risks John Bushell January 2015 johnbushell@jbvm.com.au Abstract This paper reviews future energy resource options required to provide mankind with the energy
More informationGreenhouse Gas Management Institute. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory 2009
Greenhouse Gas Management Institute Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory 2009 November 2010 Contents Forward: Developing this greenhouse gas inventory... 2 1 Introduction... 5 2 Inventory Process... 5 3
More informationCRAG - Carbon reduction action group
CRAG - Carbon reduction action group Individual and volunteer calculation and reduction of CO2 emissions EFN www.ecolo.org Contents What s a CRAG Your Carbon Footprint CRAG Rules Was the summer of 2003
More informationGeorge Bourassa, National Director, Commissioning Services Robert Bucey, Program Manager RETRO-COMMISSIONING
George Bourassa, National Director, Commissioning Services Robert Bucey, Program Manager RETRO-COMMISSIONING AIA Quality Assurance Learning Objectives Demonstrate global results of the analysis of energy
More informationCement Sector Scope 3 GHG Accounting and Reporting Guidance
business solutions for a sustainable world Cement Sector Scope 3 GHG Accounting and Reporting Guidance Contents 1 Introduction to Scope 3 in the cement sector 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 What are Scope 3 emissions?
More informationThe Energy and Carbon Footprint of Water Reclamation and Water Management in Greater Chicago
METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO The Energy and Carbon Footprint of Water Reclamation and Water Management in Greater Chicago Joseph Kozak, PhD, PE Catherine O Connor, O PhD,
More informationITU and Climate Neutrality
ITU and Climate Neutrality Arthur Levin, Head, Standardization Policy Division (ITU-T) ITU-T Focus Group on Climate Change International Telecommunication Union GLOBAL FRAMEWORK 1992 Framework Convention
More informationThe Role of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) in Virginia s Energy Future
The Role of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) in Virginia s Energy Future Prepared for: Workshop on Combined Heat and Power Development in Virginia, Alexandria, VA Prepared by: M. Willingham and M. Pipattanasomporn
More informationAnalysis of the American Opportunity Carbon Fee Act
Date Issue Brief # I S S U E B R I E F Analysis of the American Opportunity Carbon Fee Act Marc Hafstead and Raymond J. Kopp Considering a US Carbon Tax: Economic Analysis and Dialogue on Carbon Pricing
More informationTREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 8
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 8 From: Date: Subject: Staff February 20, 2009 Council Meeting Report on Florida Renewable Energy Potential
More informationAre you ready for Industry 4.0? FY2017 Basis of reporting
CONTENTS EXECUTIVE MESSAGE PERFORMANCE CLIENTS TALENT SOCIETY REPORTING INDUSTRY Are you ready for Industry 4.0? FY2017 Basis of reporting 1 FY2017 Basis of reporting This document provides additional
More informationDiscussion on the Threat of Electrification to Residential Natural Gas Demand
Discussion on the Threat of Electrification to Residential Natural Gas Demand Prepared for the American Gas Association State Affairs Committee Tuesday, October 10 h, 2017 Mike Sloan Managing Director
More informationMeasuring Electricity Class Activity
Measuring Electricity Class Activity Materials Needed: 1. 6 Kill A Watt devices (note: these can be obtained from a variety of sources, i.e., local hardware stores, internet [average cost is $19.99; available
More information