1.0 INTRODUCTION SITE PLAN DESCRIPTION OF SITE PLAN COMPONENTS TURBINE LOCATIONS CLOSURE... 2.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "1.0 INTRODUCTION SITE PLAN DESCRIPTION OF SITE PLAN COMPONENTS TURBINE LOCATIONS CLOSURE... 2."

Transcription

1

2 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT DRAFT SITE PLAN REPORT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION SITE PLAN DESCRIPTION OF SITE PLAN COMPONENTS TURBINE LOCATIONS CLOSURE REFERENCES List of Tables Table 2.1: Site Plan Components Table 2.2: Turbine and Transformer Station Coordinates List of Appendices Appendix A Draft Site Plan Appendix B Noise Assessment Reports i

3 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT DRAFT SITE PLAN REPORT 1.0 Introduction Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. (GVWF) is proposing to develop, construct, operate and decommission the 40 megawatt (MW) Grand Valley Wind Farms - Phase 3 Wind Project (the Project) in the Town of Grand Valley and Township of Amaranth, Dufferin County in response to the Government of Ontario s initiative to promote the development of renewable electricity in the province. The Project Study Area is generally bordered on the north by Highway 89, on the south by County Road 109, on the east by 9th Line and on the west by East West Luther Townline. The proposed Project Location includes all parts of the land in, on or over which the Project is proposed (the construction area for the Project). The proposed Project Location and Project Study Area are shown in Figures 1 and 2, Appendix A. The basic components of the Project include: Between 14 and 17 wind turbine generators (Siemens SWT and/or SWT turbine) with a total maximum installed nameplate capacity of 40MW. The turbine models are identical in structure, and would be de-rated, generating less electricity per turbine to meet the contract nameplate capacity. Noise Assessment Reports have been completed for both turbine models as part of the Renewable Energy Approval (REA) process; A 34.5 kv underground power line collector system that would transport the electricity generated from the Project to the Hydro One Networks Inc. (HONI) transmission system.; Fibreoptic cabling laid with the underground collector lines; Turbine access roads; Crane pads; One connection point to the existing HONI electrical transmission system; Existing operations and maintenance facilities to be leased by the Project (joining the current facilities for the operation of the Grand Valley Phase 1 and 2 Wind Projects). The currently municipally-serviced office facility is located at 35A Main Street South, Grand Valley and the currently unserviced warehouse facility is located at 27 Mill Street West, Grand Valley; Existing parking (owned) and gravel quarry (leased) sites to be used for employee parking and temporary construction trailer sites ( and County Road 25, Grand Valley);A 34.5 kv/230 kv 45 MVA transformer station; and, Meteorological equipment, including an approximately 100 m MET tower or a surface mounted SoDAR unit. 1.1

4 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT DRAFT SITE PLAN REPORT Introduction April 2013 Temporary components include: Work and storage areas during construction at the turbine locations and along the underground power line collector system; and, Office, parking and storage areas during construction for the work crews during the construction phase of the Project. GVWF retained Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) to prepare the REA application with input from Zephyr North Ltd., and Archaeological Services Inc. The REA application is a requirement under Ontario Regulation 359/09 - Renewable Energy Approvals under Part V.0.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (O. Reg. 359/09), as amended. According to subsection 6 (3) of O. Reg. 359/09, the Project is classified as a Class 4 Wind Facility and will follow the requirements identified in O. Reg. 359/09 for such a facility. 1.2

5 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT DRAFT SITE PLAN REPORT 2.0 Site Plan This Draft Site Plan Report has been prepared for the Project in accordance with section 54.1 of O. Reg. 359/09. The purpose of this report is to crystalize the Project thereby fixing the location of noise receptors as defined by O. Reg. 359/09. The Draft Site Plan identifies the following information at the Project Location, or within 300 m of the Project Location: Buildings and structures (e.g. turbines, collector and transmission lines, transformer station, substation, etc.); Roads; Utility corridors; Rights-of-way and easements; Noise receptors within 2 km of the turbine locations; and Wind turbines from proposed and existing facilities. The Draft Site Plan for the Project is attached in Appendix A. 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF SITE PLAN COMPONENTS Table 2.1 provides a description of each component of the Draft Site Plan. Table 2.1: Site Plan Components Site Plan Component Description Project Components Buildings or structures The following buildings or structures are shown on the Draft Site Plan: Turbines Transformer Station Site Meteorological tower Electrical and data collection system New temporary construction storage, parking, and trailer areas Roads Permanent Project access roads for turbine access. Utility corridors, rights of way or easements Easements associated with participating properties are for certain access roads and collector system elements. Existing Features within 300 m of the Project Location Buildings or structures Buildings are shown on the aerial imagery on the Draft Site Plan; these are primarily rural residences, but also include other types of buildings such as agricultural outbuildings and commercial and/or institutional buildings. Roads Municipal roads located throughout the Project Area. Highway 89 is located in the northern portion of the Project Area. Utility corridors, rights of way, and easements A 230 kv HONI corridor traverses the General Project Area, to which the Project would connect. Utilities located within the road allowances. 2.1

6 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT DRAFT SITE PLAN REPORT Site Plan April 2013 Table 2.1: Site Plan Components Site Plan Component Other Site Plan Components Noise receptors Wind Turbines from Existing or Proposed Facilities Description Noise receptors are shown, and include: Participating receptors: properties participating in the Project, and to which noise setbacks and limits do not apply; Non-participating receptors: properties not participating in the Project that have dwellings, buildings used for institutional purposes (educational facility, day nursery, health care facility, community centre or place of worship), and buildings planned for construction that have a building permit; and Vacant lot receptors: vacant land zoned to allow construction of potential noise receptors; location selected with regard to the typical building pattern in the area. All proposed turbines are located at least 550 m from the nearest non-participating or vacant lot receptor; these receptors are included in the Noise Assessment. Operating wind turbines in the vicinity of the Project include: Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. Phase 1 and 2 Wind Projects TransAlta Melancthon 1 and 2 Wind Projects 2.2 TURBINE LOCATIONS Table 2.2 identifies the turbine locations as shown in the Draft Site Plan (Appendix A). UTM coordinates of receptors within 1.5 km of turbine locations and UTM coordinates of other existing and proposed turbines are provided in the Noise Assessment Reports prepared for the Project, included as Appendix B to this report. Table 2.2: Turbine and Transformer Station Coordinates Turbine # UTM Easting UTM Northing Transformer Station

7

8 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT DRAFT SITE PLAN REPORT 3.0 References Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Technical Guide to Renewable Energy Approvals. Ontario Regulation 359/09 made under the Environmental Protection Act Renewable Energy Approvals Under Part V.0.1 of the Act. 3.1

9 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT DRAFT SITE PLAN REPORT Appendix A Draft Site Plan

10

11

12

13

14 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT DRAFT SITE PLAN REPORT Appendix B Noise Assessment Reports

15

16 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES This Report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. any person acting on its behalf: (a) (b) Makes any warranty or representation whatsoever, express or implied, (i) with respect to the use of any information, apparatus, method, process, or similar item disclosed in this report, including merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, or (ii) that such use does not infringe on or interfere with privately owned rights, including any party's intellectual property, or (iii) that this report is suitable to any particular user's circumstance, or Assumes responsibility for any damages or other liability whatsoever resulting from your selection or use of this report or any information, apparatus, method, process or similar item disclosed in this report. 2

17 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose Revision Revision Revision Brief Project Description Reporting Details Sound Level Limits for Wind Farms PROJECT LAYOUT Project Site Project Details Municipal Zoning Adjacent Projects Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & Phase 2 Wind Farm Project Melancthon Wind Facility Substations Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project Melancthon Wind Facility DESCRIPTION OF RECEPTORS Definition Determination Vacant Lots Methodology Concordance Table DESCRIPTION OF SOURCES Wind Turbines Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) Melancthon Wind Facility

18 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Transformer Substations Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project Melancthon Wind Facility NOISE EMISSION RATINGS Turbine Noise Definition Standard Wind Turbines Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221kW) Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126kW) Melancthon Wind Facility GE Wind 1.5sle Turbine Site-Specific Vertical Wind Shear Exponent Substations Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Substation Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project Substation Melancthon Wind Facility Substation IMPACT ASSESSMENT Methodology Specific Parameters Additional parameters and conditions Results NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY TABLES NOISE LEVEL ISOPLETH MAP EXAMPLE CALCULATION Method of Calculation Example CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES APPENDIX A TURBINE, RECEPTOR, VACANT LOT AND PARTICIPANT LOCATIONS APPENDIX B ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION

19 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision List of Figures Figure 1-1 Project location map...7 Figure 2-1 Project site map...12 Figure 5-1 SWT (MP 2221 kw) wind speed sensitivity test...23 Figure 5-2 SWT (MP 2126 kw) wind speed sensitivity test...25 Figure dba noise isopleth map for 1.5 and 4.5 m receptor heights...43 List of Tables Table 3-1 GVWFP3 GVWFP1&2 receptor and VLSR concordance table...16 Table 5-1 Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) Wind turbine acoustic emissions summary...24 Table 5-2 Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) Wind turbine acoustic emissions summary...25 Table 5-3 Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221kW) Wind turbine acoustic emissions summary...27 Table 5-4 Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126kW) Wind turbine acoustic emissions summary...28 Table 5-5 GE Wind 1.5sle Wind turbine acoustic emissions summary...29 Table 5-6 GVWFP3 transformer acoustic emissions summary...30 Table 5-7 GVWFP1&2 transformer acoustic emissions summary...31 Table 5-8 Melancthon WF transformer acoustic emissions summary...32 Table 6-1 Highest noise levels at receptors...35 Table 7-1 Receptor noise level summary table...36 Table 7-2 Vacant lot surrogate receptor noise level summary table...39 Table 7-3 Participant noise level summary table...41 Table 9-1 Sample calculation for receptor and turbine...45 Table 9-2 Sample calculation for single receptor and multiple turbines

20 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose This Noise Assessment Report (NAR) describes the results of a noise impact study for Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc.'s proposed Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project (GVWFP3). 1.2 Revision Revision was the original Noise Assessment Report. 1.3 Revision Revision included the following changes. Revision was based on a full set (for 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 ms -1 wind speeds) of updated octave band source sound power levels provided by Siemens Wind Power Canada for all relevant members of the Siemens SWT turbine family. Analysis of the data demonstrated that the MoE-defined predictable worst case occurred for the 6 ms -1 octave band set for both the SWT (Max Power 2221 kw) and SWT (Max Power 2126 kw) turbine models. These predictable worst case values were used for that report s noise assessment. For clarity in distinguishing them from Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project turbines, project turbines were renumbered. Turbines were added, and turbines were relocated. Also, some turbine model nomenclature was modified to correspond more closely to that used by the manufacturer. Melancthon Wind Facility substation transformers were added. Substation transformer data were updated. A concordance table between the Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project and Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm project receptors was included. 6

21 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Updates and changes were made to receptor, participant, and VLSR data. Minor corrections, revisions, and updates were included. 1.4 Revision The present Revision (2-2.3) includes the following changes. Turbines T111 and T116 have been deleted from the project. The wind farm now consists of 17 turbines The location of turbine T102 has changed. However, it remains on the same property. The location of transformer Tr119 has changed. However, it remains on the same property. Based in part on project stakeholder feedback, updates, corrections, and changes have been made to receptor, participant and VLSR data. Minor corrections, revisions, and updates are included. 1.5 Brief Project Description The Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project will be located to the northwest of the town of Grand Valley in Dufferin County. The project described herein features 17 wind turbines with a nominal project capacity of 37.6 MW. Turbines from the Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project (GVWFP1&2) are interspersed with turbines of the presently-described project. Melancthon Wind Facility turbines are located to the northeast. Figure 1-1 shows the location of the project within the province of Ontario. 1.6 Reporting Details This report has been prepared to meet all reporting requirements related to wind project noise for a Renewable Energy Approval (REA) under the Green Energy and Green Economy Act 2009 (Government of Ontario, 2009) A noise impact assessment was carried out for this project under Section 55.(3) of O. Reg 359/09 (Government of Ontario, 2009b) and amendments (O.Reg. 521/10, Government of Ontario, 2010; O.Reg. 231/11, Government of Ontario, 2011; Figure 1-1 Project location map. 7

22 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision O.Reg. 195/12, Government of Ontario, 2012). The assessment methodology and calculations conform to the ISO International Standard (ISO, 1996). Results of the analysis have been interpreted using Ministry of Environment Guidelines (MoE, 2008). This latter document generally provides guidelines and clarifications for the application of MoE regulations document NPC-232 (MoE, 1995) to wind farm projects. The MoE (2008) Guidelines document prescribes receptor noise level limits based on an analysis of typical wind-induced background noise levels, and tabulates these limits as functions of the ambient 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 ms -1 wind speeds measured at 10 m above ground level (a.g.l.). Note that the receptor noise level limits must be met for noise produced by other project hardware such as substation transformers in addition to noise produced by the wind turbines. This report will show that the estimated noise levels generated by the project turbines and other hardware meet the MoE (2008) prescribed limits at all qualified receptors. 1.7 Sound Level Limits for Wind Farms MoE (2008) lists the sound level limits for wind farms (based on the NPC-205 and NPC-232 publications and a consideration of the background ambient windinduced sound level) as follows. Note that noise contributions from project switching, transformer, and substations must be included. Summary of Sound Level Limits for Wind Turbines Wind speed (ms -1 ) at 10 m height Wind turbine sound level limits Class 3 Area, dba Wind turbine sound level limits Class 1 Area, dba Reference wind induced background sound level L 90, dba

23 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision PROJECT LAYOUT 2.1 Project Site Figure 2-1 shows the Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project. Typical topographic map features along with project details are shown on the map. Within the project domain, the topography can be characterized as gently rolling with a topographic elevation in the project area of approximately 490 m above sea level (a.s.l). The surface roughness of the project domain is typical of Ontario rural terrain with a heterogeneous mixture of agricultural fields, woodlots, farm buildings, dwellings, and rural settlements. The primary activity in this area is agriculture. The GVWFP3 site features a population density typical of southern Ontario rural communities a relatively sparse population in the countryside except for a small number of settlement clusters (villages and towns). The town of Grand Valley lies immediately to the southeast of the project site. 2.2 Project Details Figure 2-1 shows the properties that have been optioned for lease to the project proponent (Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc.) along with prospective turbine, point of reception (receptor), vacant lot surrogate receptor (VLSR), participating point of reception (participant), and vacant lot locations. Turbine numbers are designated with the prefix T, receptors with R, VLSRs with V, and participants with P. As specified by O.Reg 359/09, the Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project is a Class 4 Wind Project. The GVWFP3 as described here will consist of 17 Siemens noise and power derated SWT turbines for a project capacity of approximately 37.6 MW. The specific turbine models proposed are the SWT (Max Power 2,221kW) and the SWT (Max Power 2,126kW). Turbines T101, T102, T103, T104, T105, T106, T108, T109, T110, T112, T113, T114, T115, T117, T118 will be the proposed SWT- 9

24 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision (Max Power 2,221kW) model. Turbines T107 & T120 will be the proposed SWT (Max Power 2,126kW) model. Project turbines are numbered T101 through T120 in Figure 2-1. (Note that Tr119 is a project power transformer.) A listing of all GVWFP3 turbine locations can be found in Section 12 (Appendix A). The project stretches for a distance of about 12 km east-to-west and about 15 km north-to-south. The Ontario NPC designation for the project properties would generally be Class 3 Rural. Typical background sound levels for these areas would be generated by residential, agricultural, and small commercial activities, ambient sound from wind, and vehicle noise from regional roads. For the purpose of this report, all areas have been considered to be NPC Class Municipal Zoning Typically, the project area is zoned as Agricultural. 2.4 Adjacent Projects Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & Phase 2 Wind Farm Project Figure 2-1 also shows the locations of existing turbines in the Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc.'s Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & Phase 2 Wind Farm Project. These turbines are located generally to the north and on the eastern side of the Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project. The combination of Phase 1 and 2 projects is comprised of 9x Siemens noise and power derated SWT turbines. The specific models are the SWT (MP 2,221kW) and the SWT (MP 2,126kW) for a total project capacity of 19.8 MW. The Phase 1 and 2 turbines are numbered T2 to T24 in Figure 2-1 Details of these turbines are provided further below. All turbines in the Phase 1 and 2 projects within 5 km of any receptor of the GVWFP3 have been included in the noise assessment of the subject project Melancthon Wind Facility Figure 2-1 also shows the locations of existing turbines in the Trans-Alta Melancthon Wind Facility (MWF). These turbines are located mainly to the northeast. There are 21x (from a total of 133x MWF project turbines) GE-1.5sle Melancthon Wind Facility turbines within 5 km of any receptor for the GVWFP3. These turbines are numbered T352 to T503 in Figure 2-1. Details of the GE-1.5sle turbine are provided further below. All Melancthon Wind Facility turbines within 5 km of any receptor of the GVWFP3 have been included in the noise assessment of the subject project. 10

25 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Substations Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project The GVWFP3 will include a substation with a relatively small power transformer for conversion of the collection voltage to distribution-level voltage. This transformer is shown as Tr119 in Figure 2-1. Noise from this transformer has been included in all the reported noise calculations Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project The combination Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project is served by a single substation encompassing two relatively small power transformers for conversion of the collection voltage to distribution-level voltage. These transformers are shown as Tr25 and Tr26 in Figure 2-1. Noise from these transformers has been included in all the reported noise calculations Melancthon Wind Facility The Melancthon Wind Facility contains one substation with two large power transformers. These convert the project collection-level voltage to transmission system voltage (230 kv). They are shown in Figure 2-1 as Tr598 and Tr599. Noise from these transformers has been included in all the reported noise calculations. 11

26 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Figure 2-1 Project site map. 12

27 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision DESCRIPTION OF RECEPTORS 3.1 Definition Receptors (non-participating points of reception), vacant lot surrogate receptors (VLSRs), and participants (participating points of reception) are defined in Ontario MoE NPC-232 (MoE, 1995b) and Noise Guidelines (MoE, 2008) publications, and in Ontario O.Reg. 359/09 and proposed amendments (Government of Ontario; 2009b, 2010, 2011, 2012). 3.2 Determination Receptor and participant data (location, type, dwelling height, etc.) were supplied by Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. These were used in this noise assessment report. Receptors and participants were identified through mapping, aerial photographs, and on-site surveys of the area by a third party on behalf of Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. Typically, for this area receptors are residential dwellings of individuals and families not associated with the subject project. Section 12 (Appendix A) lists the locations and details of all known receptors and participants situated within the project area. Their locations are also shown in Figure 2-1. All receptors within 1.5 km of any GVWFP3 wind turbine or transformer have been included and reported in this noise impact analysis. All receptors have been considered to be designated as rural (NPC Class 3). For the purposes of noise assessment, participants have been defined as dwellings occupied by landowners who receive financial compensation for the placement of project hardware (turbines, cables, roads, substations, etc.) on their properties. For information, 203 receptors, 134 VLSRs, and 8 participants (total 345) have been identified within 2 km of any GVWFP3 turbine; 178 vacant lots have also been identified within 2 km of any project turbine. 13

28 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Vacant Lots The MoE (2008) Noise Guidelines also require prediction of the noise levels on...vacant lots that have been zoned by the local municipality to permit residential or similar noise-sensitive uses.... Therefore, all vacant lots within 1.5 km of any turbine or substation in the GVWFP3 were identified as those lots defined by the complete set of cadastral parcel fabric which did not contain a receptor dwelling, nor a participant dwelling, nor project infrastructure (turbine, cable, substation, etc.), and were obviously not road rights-of-way, public property, industrial or commercial property, etc. A 1 ha building envelope within the vacant lot property that would reasonably be expected to contain the use, and that conforms with the municipal zoning by-laws in effect was also identified for each of the vacant lots by determining a location within the lot where the predicted noise level would be below the allowed maxima. A vacant lot surrogate receptor (VLSR) located in the 1 ha building envelope and designated with a height of 4.5 m was created for the purpose of noise estimation. The VLSRs are listed in Section 12 (Appendix A). 3.4 Methodology ISO modelling was carried out for all receptors, participants and VLSRs. Typically, a resultant sound pressure level for each receptor/ VLSR/participant is determined as stipulated in Section of MoE (2008) where there is no qualifying transformer within the project, and as stipulated in Section where there is a qualifying transformer. In the case of this project, which includes a substation, Section was used. The heights of dwellings designated as 1-, 2-, and 3-storeys were set to be 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 m respectively. For areas where there is such a high density of receptors that it would be impractical (and tedious for the reader) to include them all, a comprehensive selection of sample receptors (HDSRs, High Density Sample Receptors) were designated. These specific receptors were sampled so as to represent the cluster of all receptors in such a way that the sample receptors would be those subject to the maximum sound pressure levels from the surrounding turbines. Typically, receptors at all corners, along all boundaries, and in the centre of the high density cluster were chosen with (generally) a maximum separation of 200 m between sample receptors where possible. All sample receptors were assigned a height of 4.5 m to ensure that any 2-storey residences within the cluster were represented. As noted above, participating receptors (referred to herein as participants) have also been surveyed and are shown in Figure 2-1 and listed in Section 12 (Appendix A). Estimates of sound pressure levels were made for the participant locations. It should be noted that the receptors, participants and VLSRs listed in Section 12 include those that are closer than or equal to 1,500 m from any project turbine or qualifying substation transformer (if existent) noise source. 14

29 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Concordance Table As requested by MoE, a concordance table that rationalizes the identification of receptors and VLSRs between the GVWFP3 and the adjacent GVWFP1&2 has been included here. Table 3-1 lists receptors and VLSRs which are located mutually within 1.5 km of any wind turbine in the GVWFP3 and the GVWFP1&2. (Note that there were no mutual receptors with the neighbouring Melancthon Wind Facility.) The next paragraphs describe the concordance table s columns. The first pair of columns in the table lists the UTM coordinates (NAD83, UTM17N) of the receptor or VLSR as determined for the GVWFP3. The second pair of columns lists the coordinates as provided by HGC Engineering (2013) and listed in the GVWFP1&2 noise assessment report. Note that for receptors, the values in these pairs of columns are generally only slightly different. The differences can be attributed to the choice of the exact location of the dwelling in question and the precision of the GIS data including base mapping and air or satellite photography. However, in the case of VLSRs, the locations can be significantly different since the VLSR need only be located on the vacant property in question, although it must be surrounded by at least 1 ha of available land, zoned to permit residential or similar uses, conform with local building codes, and be consistent with the typical building pattern in the area. In some instances, it is possible for the two project designers to reasonably choose two VLSRs which are hundreds of metres apart but still located on the same vacant lot property. Note that there are some receptors and VLSRs in each of the projects that do not appear to have matches in the other project. These have been indicated by n/a in the table. The fifth column in the table lists the distance between the two locations (GVWFP3 designated or GVWFP1&2 designated) determined for the receptor or VLSR. The next pair of columns lists the receptor or VLSR identifier first as used for the GVWFP3, and second as used for the GVWFP1&2. Naturally, these would not be expected to be the same. As noted above, there are some receptors/vlsrs that are found in one project and not in the other. Again, this is indicated by n/a. The next pair of columns lists the distances from the receptor or VLSR to the nearest noise source (turbine or transformer) first for the GVWFP3, and second for the GVWFP1&2. While it might seem logical that these distances should be identical for receptors, again the precision of the receptor location as discussed above can lead to different results where the receptor is almost equidistant from two different noise sources. In the case of VLSRs, the differences can be significant since, as noted previously, VLSRs for each of the projects can be located in quite different places on the same vacant lot. The next three columns list the receptor/vlsr sound pressure levels the first for the case where only GVWFP3 noise sources are included, the second where only GVWFP1&2 noise sources are included, and the third where noise sources from both projects are included. Note that the sound pressure levels are listed for the 15

30 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision GVWFP3 receptor/vlsr locations. They have not been determined for the GVWFP1&2 receptor/vlsr locations. In most cases, these should be quite similar but there could be significant differences where there is a substantial separation between GVWFP3/GVWFP1&2 receptor/vlsr pairs. This would more likely occur in the case of the VLSRs. Note that the Total Level has been determined from a full analysis including both the GVWFP3 and the GVWFP1&2 noise sources at GVWFP3 receptors/vlsrs. Table 3-1 GVWFP3 GVWFP1&2 receptor and VLSR concordance table. UTM coordinates GVWFP3 Easting (m) Northing (m) Easting (m) UTM coordinates GVWFP1&2 Northing (m) Difference (m) Noise receptor ID GVWFP3 GVWFP 1&2 GVWFP3 Distance to nearest source (m) Nearest source ID Level of farm (dba) GVWFP 1&2 GVWFP3 GVWFP 1&2 GVWFP3 Level (dba) GVWFP 1&2 Total 552,385 4,868,686 n/a n/a n/a V618 n/a 1436 n/a T105 n/a 29.5 n/a n/a 552,467 4,868, ,467 4,868, R169 RV T105 T ,560 4,868, ,561 4,868,629 1 R173 R T105 T n/a n/a 553,028 4,869,160 n/a n/a R030 n/a 1264 n/a T8 n/a n/a n/a 553,121 4,869, ,119 4,869,327 2 R190 R T105 T ,400 4,869,276 n/a n/a n/a R1555 n/a 896 n/a T105 n/a 35.9 n/a n/a 553,287 4,868, ,287 4,868,875 1 P193 R T105 T ,612 4,868, ,611 4,868,939 1 R202 R T120 T n/a n/a 553,617 4,868,755 n/a n/a RV09 n/a 957 n/a T6 n/a n/a n/a 553,653 4,868, ,658 4,868,496 6 R206 R T120 T

31 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision DESCRIPTION OF SOURCES 4.1 Wind Turbines Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project The turbines proposed for the GVWFP3 are manufactured by Siemens Wind Systems A/S ( of Germany. Siemens Wind Power A/S is a relative newcomer to the ranks of wind turbine manufacturers. However, it entered the market by purchasing the long-standing and experienced Bonus turbine manufacturing company. The turbine models proposed for the GVWFP3 are noiseand power-reduced variants of the SWT Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) The Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) is a noise- and power-reduced member of the Siemens SWT turbine family. The following table summarizes this turbine s characteristics. Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) Type, number of blades, rotor orientation horizontal-axis, 3-bladed, upwind wind turbine Rated power 2,221 kw Rotor diameter; swept area m; 10,000 m 2 Operational rotation rate 6.0 to 13.0 rpm; variable speed Hub height; tower type 99.5 m; steel tubular tower Power regulation pitch regulation with variable speed Cut-in wind speed 3 ms -1 Cut-out wind speed 25 ms -1 Rated wind speed 12 to 13 ms -1 Gearbox yes; 3 stage planetary/helical 17

32 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) Generator; speed Turbine transformer Braking system Yaw system synchronous permanent magnet generator external transformer; step-up transformer on concrete pad at the base of the turbine aerodynamic primary brake by full-span pitching with hydraulic activation; 3 caliper hydraulic brake at generator rear end active, externally geared, passive friction brake Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) The Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) is a noise- and power-reduced member of the Siemens SWT turbine family. The following table summarizes this turbine s characteristics. Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 KW) Type, number of blades, rotor orientation horizontal-axis, 3-bladed, upwind wind turbine Rated power 2,126 kw Rotor diameter; swept area m; 10,000 m 2 Operational rotation rate 6.0 to 13.0 rpm; variable speed Hub height; tower type 99.5 m; steel tubular tower Power regulation pitch regulation with variable speed Cut-in wind speed 3 ms -1 Cut-out wind speed 25 ms -1 Rated wind speed 12 to 13 ms -1 Gearbox yes; 3 stage planetary/helical Generator; speed synchronous permanent magnet generator Turbine transformer external transformer; step-up transformer on concrete pad at the base of the turbine aerodynamic primary brake by full-span pitching Braking system with hydraulic activation; 3 caliper hydraulic brake at generator rear end Yaw system active, externally geared, passive friction brake Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project In addition to the GVWFP3 turbines, there are 7x Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) and 2x Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) turbines in the Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project. 18

33 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Information on the rating and noise characteristics of these turbines has been supplied by Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc.. All of the Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project turbines have been included in the present assessment Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) The following table describes this turbine's major characteristics. Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) Type, number of blades, rotor orientation horizontal-axis, 3-bladed, upwind wind turbine Rated power 2,221 kw Rotor diameter; swept area m; 8,000 m 2 Operational rotation rate 6.0 to 16.0 rpm; variable speed Hub height; tower type 99.5 m; steel tubular tower Power regulation pitch regulation with variable speed Cut-in wind speed 4 ms -1 Cut-out wind speed 25 ms -1 Rated wind speed 12 to 13 ms -1 Gearbox yes; 3 stage planetary/helical Generator; speed asynchronous with squirrel-cage rotor, without slip rings; variable speed Turbine transformer internal (within tower) aerodynamic primary brake by full-span Braking system feathering of individual blades; mechanical disk brake on high-speed shaft which has two hydraulic calipers Yaw system active electric externally geared slewring; passive friction brake Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) The following table describes this turbine's major characteristics. Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) Type, number of blades, rotor orientation Rated power Rotor diameter; swept area Operational rotation rate Hub height; tower type horizontal-axis, 3-bladed, upwind wind turbine 2,126 kw m; 8,000 m to 16.0 rpm; variable speed 99.5 m; steel tubular tower 19

34 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) Power regulation pitch regulation with variable speed Cut-in wind speed 4 ms -1 Cut-out wind speed 25 ms -1 Rated wind speed 12 to 13 ms -1 Gearbox yes; 3 stage planetary/helical Generator; speed asynchronous with squirrel-cage rotor, without slip rings; variable speed Turbine transformer internal (within tower) aerodynamic primary brake by full-span Braking system feathering of individual blades; mechanical disk brake on high-speed shaft which has two hydraulic calipers Yaw system active electric externally geared slewring; passive friction brake Melancthon Wind Facility There are 21x GE Wind 1.5sle turbines in the Melancthon Wind Facility within 5,000m of any Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project receptors. All of these turbines have been included in the present assessment. The following table describes the turbine's major characteristics. Type, number of blades, rotor orientation Rated power Rotor diameter; swept area Operational rotation rate Hub height; tower type Power regulation GE Wind 1.5sle horizontal-axis, 3-bladed, upwind wind turbine 1,500 kw 77.0 m; 4,657 m to 20.4 rpm; variable speed 80.0 m; steel tubular tower Individual full span pitch control; variable speed with pulse-width modulated IGBT frequency converter Cut-in wind speed 3.5 ms -1 Cut-out wind speed 25 ms -1 Rated wind speed 12 ms -1 Gearbox yes; 3 stage planetary/helical Generator; speed Turbine transformer Braking system Asynchronous; double fed induction; 1,500 to 1,800 rpm External transformer; step-up transformer on concrete pad at the base of the turbine aerodynamic primary brake by feathering 20

35 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision GE Wind 1.5sle Yaw system blades; emergency hydraulic disc brake electromechanical 4.2 Transformer Substations Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project A single transformer is proposed for the single substation included in this project. The substation location is shown in Figure 2-1 as Tr119. At the present stage of this project, Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. states that only limited information is available for the transformer. Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. has undertaken to provide a full description of the substation and transformer as soon as details are finalized. Noise characteristics and additional details are provided in Section Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project There is a pair of Northern Transformer Incorporated 7.5/10.0 MVA ONAN/ONAF transformers located at the GVWFP1&2 substation. These are shown in Figure 2-1 as Tr25 and Tr26. There are limited details available in the project noise assessment report (HGC Engineering, 2011). Noise characteristic and additional details of these transformers are given in Section Melancthon Wind Facility There are two collocated transformers at one substation in the Melancthon Wind Facility. These are shown in Figure 2-1 as Tr504 and Tr505. There are limited details available in the project noise assessment reports (Helimax Energy Inc., 2006, 2007). However, it has been determined that both transformers are presently 100 MVA Siemens TP-720 models. (The first-installed transformer had been replaced in 2008.) It is also understood that both transformers are now surrounded by a single, continuous acoustic barrier. The operating voltages of the transformers are 34.5 kv (low side) and 230 kv (high side). The transformers are each rated at 100 MVA. Noise characteristics and additional details of these transformers are given in Section

36 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision NOISE EMISSION RATINGS 5.1 Turbine Noise Definition Standard The commonly accepted global wind turbine noise definition Standard is IEC (IEC, 2002). The MoE (2008) Guidelines require that,...acoustic emission information must be determined and reported in accordance with the international standard CAN/CSA-C Fortunately, these two Standards are completely equivalent as confirmed in the preamble to the description of the CAN/CSA-C Standard (CSA, 2007) as follows. CSA Preface This is the first edition of CAN/CSA-C , Wind turbine generator systems - Part 11: Acoustic noise measurement techniques, which is an adoption without modification of the identically titled IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) Standard (edition 2:2002 consolidated with amendment 1:2006). At the time of publication, IEC :2002+A1:2006 is available from IEC in English only. CSA will publish the French version when it becomes available from IEC. In this report, the IEC and CAN/CSA-C Standards have been used interchangeably. 5.2 Wind Turbines Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) turbine source sound power level broadband data for 10 m wind speeds of 3 to 12 ms -1 to cut-out (25 ms -1 ) and octave band data for 10 m wind speeds of 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 ms -1 were provided in Siemens Wind Power A/S documentation supplied by Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. This documentation is shown in Section 13 (Appendix B). The broadband and octave band noise information was used with a power law wind shear exponent of 0.50 (see below for derivation) to synthesize / interpolate / 22

37

38

39

40 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221kW) Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221kW) turbine source sound power level broadband data for 10 m wind speeds of 3 ms -1 to turbine cutout (25 ms -1 ) and octave band data for 10 m wind speeds of 6 and 8 ms -1 were provided in Siemens A/S documentation supplied by Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. The documentation confirms that the source noise values were obtained...with reference to the code IEC with amendment 1 dated This documentation is shown in Section 13 (Appendix B). The broadband and octave band noise information was used with the site-specific power law wind shear exponent of 0.50 (see below for derivation) to synthesize / interpolate / extrapolate octave band source sound power levels for 10 m a.g.l. wind speeds of 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 ms -1 for use in the ISO estimates of receptor noise levels. Siemens states in a private communication (A. Jensen, 2011/01/10), The Wind test Report WT 4498/05 [see Windtest, 2005 in References] for the SWT wind turbine generator is relevant for assessment of the SWT wind turbine generator tonality as the nacelle and frequency converter are identical for both the SWT and the SWT There are no other components on the SWT that result in ascertainable tonalities determined in accordance with IEC No tonal penalty has been applied to this turbine. The 10 m broadband and octave band source sound power levels for the Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221kW) turbine for a hub height of 99.5 m are shown in Table 5-3. Note that the Manufacturer s emission levels for octave band source sound power levels were provided only for 6 and 8 ms -1. For 7 ms -1, octave band sound power levels have been interpolated; the 9 and 10 ms -1 sound power levels have been set equal to the 8 ms -1 sound power levels. 26

41

42

43

44 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision adjustments for hub-height winds speeds with respect to determination of Adjusted emission levels. 5.4 Substations Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Substation As noted above, only limited details are available at this time for the transformer source noise for the GVWFP3 substation. However, Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. has undertaken to ensure that the procurement specification for this transformer will stipulate a maximum broadband source sound power level of 88 dba. In addition, Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. may choose to further mitigate the transformer noise transmission with sound barriers. Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. has also undertaken to transmit all required information to the Ministry as soon as it is available. For design purposes, octave band source sound power levels characteristic of a typical power transformer were adjusted to reflect the specified broadband level (88 dba). They are listed in Table 5-6 along with source sound power levels that include a 5 db tonal penalty (for all octave bands, for an overall penalty of 5 db). The tonal penalty was included in this assessment. No attenuation due to sound barriers has been included in this assessment. As noted above, noise (including the tonal penalty) from this substation transformer was used in all calculations. Table 5-6 GVWFP3 transformer acoustic emissions summary. Make and Model: To be finalized Operating voltage: 34.5 / 230 kv Rating: 45 MVA Core tank size: To be finalized Source height (m): 4.0 (to be finalized) Source location: outside Sound characteristics: steady, tonal Noise control measures: uncontrolled Frequency Source sound power level Tonal penalty (Hz) (dblin) (db) (dblin) Broadband (dba) Net source sound power level

45 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project Substation There is a pair of Northern Transformer Incorporated 7.5/10.0 MVA ONAN/ONAF transformers located at the GVWFP1&2 substation. Only limited noise information with respect to those transformers is available from that project s noise assessment report (HGC Engineering, 2011). However, it is known that it was designed to a limiting broadband source sound power level of approximately 88.4 dba. A summary of the acoustic emissions characteristics as provided in that project s noise assessment report is contained in Table 5-7. Noise (including the tonal penalty) from these transformers was used in all calculations Melancthon Wind Facility Substation Only limited information with respect to the pair of Melancthon Wind Facility transformers is available from that project s noise assessment reports (Helimax Energy Inc., 2006, 2007). However, it has been determined that both transformers are presently 100 MVA Siemens TP-720 models. (The first-installed transformer had been replaced in 2008.) It is also understood that both transformers are now surrounded by a single, continuous acoustic barrier. It is known (Helimax Energy Inc., 2006) that the original design of the project included a transformer broadband source sound power level specification of 83 dba, so, for design purposes, octave band source sound power levels characteristic of a typical power transformer were adjusted to reflect this specified broadband level. They are listed in Table 5-8 along with source sound power levels that include a 5 db tonal penalty (for all octave bands, for an overall penalty of 5 db). The tonal penalty was included in this assessment. No attenuation due to sound barriers has been included in this assessment. Noise from these transformers was used in all calculations. Table 5-7 GVWFP1&2 transformer acoustic emissions summary. Make and Model: Northern Transformer Incorporated. ONAN/ONAF Sealed Transformer Operating voltage: 34.5 / 44 kv Rating: 7.5 / 10 MVA Core tank size: 5,978 l Source height (m): Unknown (4.0 used) Source location: outside Sound characteristics: steady, tonal Noise control measures: uncontrolled Frequency Source sound power level Tonal penalty (Hz) (dblin) (db) (dblin) Broadband (dba) Net source sound power level

46 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Table 5-8 Melancthon WF transformer acoustic emissions summary. Make and Model: Siemens TP-720 AC power transformer Operating voltage: 34.5 kv / 230 kv Rating: 100 MVA Core tank size: Unknown Source height (m): Unknown (4.0 used) Source location: outside Sound characteristics: steady, tonal Noise control measures: acoustic barrier Frequency Source sound power level Tonal penalty (Hz) (dblin) (db) (dblin) Broadband (dba) Net source sound power level

47 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision IMPACT ASSESSMENT 6.1 Methodology Cumulative turbine and transformer sound levels were estimated at each of the receptors using the methodology of the ISO Standard (ISO, 1996). Wind turbine and transformer (where existent) octave band and A-weighted sound power values, standardized meteorological conditions, turbine/transformer locations, receptor/ VLSR/ participant locations, and characteristics were used to determine the A-weighted sound pressure levels at all receptors. 6.2 Specific Parameters a) Analysis was carried out for turbine source sound power levels in eight octave bands (63 to 8,000 Hz) corresponding to 10 m (a.g.l.) ambient wind speeds of 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 ms -1. b) ISO parameters, as prescribed in the MoE (2008) Noise Guidelines were set as follows: Ambient air temperature: 10 C Ambient humidity: 70 % The required atmospheric attenuation coefficients to be used in the ISO modelling of noise propagation are prescribed in MoE (2008). These have been used in the present assessment, and are shown in the following table. Atmospheric Absorption Coefficients Centre Octave Band Frequency (Hz) Atmospheric Absorption Coefficient (db/km) from MoE (2008)

48 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision c) The ISO Standard term for Ground Attenuation was calculated using the General Method (Section of the Standard). Ground factors were assigned the following values. Source ground factor: 1.0 (soft ground) Middle ground factor: 0.8 (soft ground) Receptor ground factor: 0.5 (hard/soft ground) 6.3 Additional parameters and conditions Sound pressure levels were not calculated for any receptor for which there was no GVWFP3 turbine or transformer (if existent) closer than 1,500 m. For any receptor, turbines or transformers (if existent) further than 5,000 m away were not included in the calculations. No additional adjustments were made for wind speed or direction since the ISO Standard assumes worst-case conditions for these parameters with respect to noise impact. 6.4 Results Results are reported in Tables 7-1, 7-2 and 7-3 found in Section 7 and the noise level isopleth map of Section 8. As a brief summary, Table 6-1 below is a sorted list of the receptors and VLSRs with the 25 highest sound pressure levels determined in the analysis. 34

49 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Table 6-1 Highest noise levels at receptors. Receptor ID SPrL (dba) Height (m) Nearest Turbine Project / Other Distance (m) R T8 O 552 V T107 P 596 R T6 O 597 R T120 P 569 V T6 O 715 R T115 P 560 R T6 O 652 R Tr119 P 580 R T120 P 578 R T114 P 581 V T120 P 568 R T8 O 655 R T112 P 568 R Tr119 P 374 R T6 O 600 R T8 O 662 R T115 P 610 V T115 P 645 R T115 P 706 V T106 P 691 V T107 P 599 V T110 P 555 R T8 O 692 V T8 O 736 R T8 O 653 V T117 P 662 WindFarm layout file: VGV11-Trbn-WFL017-SWT-2p3-113.csv 35

50 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY TABLES Table 7-1 Receptor noise level summary table. Point of Reception ID Description Height (m) Distance to Nearest Turbine (m) Nearest Turbine Calculated Sound Level at Selected Wind Speeds (dba) Sound Level Limit (dba) R2 Receptor T R3 Receptor T R4 Receptor T R5 Receptor T R6 Receptor T R8 Receptor T R10 Receptor T R11 Receptor T R12 Receptor T R13 Receptor T R14 Receptor T R15 Receptor T R16 Receptor T R17 Receptor T R18 Receptor T R19 Receptor T R22 Receptor T R26 Receptor T R34 Receptor T R44 Receptor T R45 Receptor T R48 Receptor T R50 Receptor T R51 Receptor T R52 Receptor T R55 Receptor T R58 Receptor T R72 Receptor T R76 Receptor T R77 Receptor T

51 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Point of Reception ID Description Height (m) Distance to Nearest Turbine (m) Nearest Turbine Calculated Sound Level at Selected Wind Speeds (dba) Sound Level Limit (dba) R78 Receptor T R80 Receptor T R86 Receptor T R89 Receptor T R93 Receptor T R95 Receptor T R97 Receptor T R99 Receptor T R100 Receptor T R101 Receptor T R103 Receptor T R109 Receptor T R112 Receptor T R113 Receptor T R117 Receptor T R118 Receptor T R119 Receptor T R120 Receptor T R122 Receptor T R124 Receptor T R128 Receptor T R134 Receptor T R136 Receptor T R139 Receptor T R140 Receptor T R143 Receptor T R145 Receptor T R146 Receptor T R148 Receptor T R149 Receptor T R152 Receptor T R156 Receptor T R157 Receptor T R158 Receptor T R159 Receptor T R161 Receptor T R164 Receptor T R165 Receptor T R169 Receptor T R171 Receptor T R173 Receptor T R174 Receptor T R177 Receptor T R179 Receptor T R182 Receptor T R184 Receptor T R190 Receptor Tr R194 Receptor T R198 Receptor T

52 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Point of Reception ID Description Height (m) Distance to Nearest Turbine (m) Nearest Turbine Calculated Sound Level at Selected Wind Speeds (dba) Sound Level Limit (dba) R199 Receptor T R202 Receptor Tr R206 Church Tr R210 Receptor Tr R215 Receptor T R216 Receptor T R217 Receptor T R219 Receptor T R222 Receptor T R226 Receptor T R230 Receptor T R231 Receptor T R232 Receptor T R233 Receptor T R235 Receptor T R236 Receptor T R238 Receptor T R239 Receptor T R241 Receptor T R243 Receptor T R244 Receptor T R245 Receptor T R248 Receptor T R249 Receptor T R253 Receptor T R254 Receptor T R258 Receptor T R263 Receptor T R270 Receptor T R304 Receptor T R305 Receptor T R306 Receptor T R307 Receptor T R308 Receptor T R310 Receptor T R311 Receptor T R312 Receptor T R313 Receptor T R673 Receptor T R1555 Receptor Tr

53 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Table 7-2 Vacant lot surrogate receptor noise level summary table. Point of Reception ID Description Height (m) Distance to Nearest Turbine (m) Nearest Turbine Calculated Sound Level at Selected Wind Speeds (dba) Sound Level Limit (dba) V360 VLSR T V361 VLSR T V366 VLSR T V367 VLSR T V374 VLSR T V408 VLSR T V409 VLSR T V410 VLSR T V411 VLSR T V412 VLSR T V414 VLSR T V415 VLSR T V416 VLSR T V429 VLSR T V446 VLSR T V481 VLSR T V482 VLSR T V483 VLSR T V484 VLSR T V528 VLSR T V608 VLSR T V613 VLSR T V614 VLSR T V617 VLSR T V618 VLSR T V620 VLSR T V621 VLSR T V627 VLSR T V668 VLSR T V671 VLSR T V672 VLSR T V674 VLSR T V677 VLSR T V687 VLSR T V692 VLSR T V693 VLSR T V725 VLSR T V726 VLSR T V727 VLSR T V731 VLSR T V732 VLSR T V733 VLSR T V734 VLSR T V735 VLSR T V1136 VLSR T V1137 VLSR T

54 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Point of Reception ID Description Height (m) Distance to Nearest Turbine (m) Nearest Turbine Calculated Sound Level at Selected Wind Speeds (dba) Sound Level Limit (dba) V1138 VLSR T V1433 VLSR T V1436 VLSR T V1487 VLSR T V1493 VLSR T V1496 VLSR T V1512 VLSR T V1519 VLSR T V1521 VLSR T V1526 VLSR T V1527 VLSR T V1528 VLSR T V1531 VLSR T V1544 VLSR T V1546 VLSR T V1553 VLSR T V1556 VLSR T V1557 VLSR T V1519 VLSR T V1521 VLSR T V1526 VLSR T V1527 VLSR T V1528 VLSR T V1529 VLSR T V1530 VLSR T V1531 VLSR T V1544 VLSR T V1546 VLSR T V1547 VLSR T V1553 VLSR T V1556 VLSR T V1557 VLSR T

55 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Table 7-3 Participant noise level summary table. Participating Receptor ID Description Height (m) Distance to Nearest Turbine (m) Nearest Turbine ID Calculated Sound Level at Selected Wind Speeds (dba) P75 Receptor T P98 Receptor T P111 Receptor T P123 Receptor T P125 Receptor T P193 Receptor Tr P204 Receptor T P271 Receptor T

56 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision NOISE LEVEL ISOPLETH MAP Figure 8-1 is a noise-level isopleth map of the A-weighted sound pressure levels (dba) generated by all qualified sources over the project region. Note that this map does not correspond to any specific 10 m a.g.l. wind speed. This is because the MoE predictable worst case (or equivalent for neighbouring turbines) octave band source sound power levels have been used for the project and neighbouring turbine types (see Section 5.2 ). For information, the predictable worst case for the project turbines has been determined to occur for a 10 m a.g.l. wind speed of 6 ms -1 for both the SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) and SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) project turbine models. The noise levels are calculated for receptors with 1.5 m (1 storey) and 4.5 m (2 storeys) heights. 42

57 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Figure dba noise isopleth map for 1.5 and 4.5 m receptor heights. 43

58 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision EXAMPLE CALCULATION 9.1 Method of Calculation The calculation of cumulative receptor noise levels from turbines and transformers uses the methodology of ISO (ISO, 1996). The calculation is based on equation (5) from ISO shown here: where L AT (DW) is the equivalent continuous A-weighted downwind sound pressure level at a receptor location, n is the number of turbines, A f (j) is the standard A-weighting for octave band j, j is an index indicating the eight standard octave-band mid-band frequencies from 63 Hz to 8 khz, L ft (ij) L ft (DW) is the equivalent continuous downwind octave-band sound pressure level at a receptor location for turbine i and octave band j, and is given by where L AT DW =10 log 10{ i=1 L W is the octave-band sound power level, in decibels, produced by the point sound source relative to a reference sound power of one picowatt, D C is the directivity correction in decibels, n L ft DW = L W D C A [ [ L ft ij A f j=1 j ]]} 44

59 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision A is the octave-band attenuation, in decibels, that occurs during propagation from the turbine to receptor, and is given by where A div is the attenuation due to geometrical divergence, A atm is the attenuation due to atmospheric absorption, A gr is the attenuation due to the ground effect, A bar is the attenuation due to a barrier, A misc is the attenuation due to miscellaneous other effects, A atm is given by A= A div A atm A gr A bar A misc A = d 1000 where α is the atmospheric attenuation coefficient, in decibels per kilometre, for each octave band at the midband frequency, d is the distance from the turbine to the receptor. Note also that A bar and A misc are not used here. 9.1 Example The following sample calculation presents intermediate octave-band results of calculations for A- weighted sound pressure levels. All model parameters are the same as previously tabulated. Table 9-1 lists the intermediate sound pressure levels calculated at receptor R112 due to the single turbine T115. Receptor and turbine are separated by 560 m. Note Table 9-1 Sample calculation for receptor and turbine. Intermediate calculations for receptor R112 and turbine T115 Mid-band Octave frequency L ft (DW) band (Hz) L W (dba) A div (db) A atm (db) A gr (db) (dba)

60 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision that the resultant A-weighted sound pressure level at R112 due to turbine T115 alone is 36.8 dba. In the table: L W is the octave-band sound power level, in decibels, produced by the point sound source relative to a reference sound power of one picowatt, A div is the attenuation due to geometrical divergence, A atm is the attenuation due to atmospheric absorption, A gr is the attenuation due to the ground effect,l ft (DW) is the equivalent continuous downwind octave-band sound pressure level. Table 9-2 shows intermediate octave band values of the calculations for the A- weighted sound pressure levels at receptor R112 due to all turbines and transformers (if existent) within 5,000 m of the receptor. The resultant A-weighted sound pressure level at R112 due to all turbines is 39.2 dba. Table 9-2 Sample calculation for single receptor and multiple turbines. Turbine ID Distance (m) Intermediate calculations for R112 and multiple turbines Turbine L ft contribution (db) in frequency band (Hz) Turbine L AT (dba) T T T T T T T T T T

61 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision CONCLUSIONS This noise impact assessment for the proposed Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project has determined that the estimated sound pressure levels at receptors and vacant lot surrogate receptors (VLSRs) in the project area comply with the Ontario Ministry of Environment sound level limits at all qualified points of reception. 47

62 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision REFERENCES Canadian Standards Association (CSA), 2007: CAN/CSA-C Wind Turbine Generator Systems Part 11: Acoustic Noise Measurement Techniques (Adopted IEC : A1:2006, edition 2.1, ). Government of Ontario, 1990: Environmental Assessment Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter E Government of Ontario, 1990: Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter E Government of Ontario, 2009: Green Energy Act, 2009, search=browsestatutes&context=#bk7 Government of Ontario, 2009b: Ontario Regulation 359/09, made under the Environmental Protection Act, Renewable Energy Approvals under Part V.0.1 of the Act b33d386b4/1/frame/?search=browseStatutes&context= Government of Ontario, 2010, O.Reg. 521/10 made under the Environmental Protection Act amending O.Reg. 359/09. Government of Ontario, 2011, O.Reg. 231/11 made under the Environmental Protection Act amending O.Reg. 359/09. Government of Ontario, 2012, O.Reg. 195/12 made under the Environmental Protection Act amending O.Reg. 359/09. Helimax Energy Inc., 2006: Environmental Noise Impact Assessment, Melancthon II Project. GL Garrad Hassan Canada Inc., 4100 rue Molson, Bureau 100, Montréal, Quebec, H1Y 3N1. Tel Fax

63 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Helimax Energy Inc., 2007: Environmental Noise Impact Assessment Addendum, Melancthon II Project. GL Garrad Hassan Canada Inc., 4100 rue Molson, Bureau 100, Montréal, Quebec, H1Y 3N1. Tel Fax HGC Engineering, 2011: Grand Valley Wind Farm Project, Grand Valley Ontario. Howe Gastmeier Chapnik Limited, 2000 Argentia Road, Plaza 1, Suite 203, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 1P7. Tel HGC Engineering, 2013: Private on 2013/02/01 from HGC Engineering including spreadsheet listing of receptors, participants, and VLSRs from original Grand Valley Wind Farm Phase 1 & 2 Noise Assessment Report. Howe Gastmeier Chapnik Limited, 2000 Argentia Road, Plaza 1, Suite 203, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 1P7. Tel International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), 2002: International Standard, Wind turbine generator systems Part 11: Acoustic noise measurement techniques. Second edition International Standards Organization (ISO), 1993: International Standard: Acoustics Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors Part 1: Calculation of the absorption of sound by the atmosphere. International Standards Organization (ISO), 1996: International Standard: Acoustics Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors Part 2: General method of calculation. Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MoE), 1995a: Sound Level Limits for Stationary Sources in Class 1 & 2 Areas (Urban) Publication NPC-205. October Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MoE), 1995b: Sound Level Limits for Stationary Sources in Class 3 Areas (Rural) Publication NPC-232. October Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MoE), 2008: MoE Noise Guidelines for Wind Farms; Interpretation for Applying MOE NPC Publications to Wind Power Generation Facilities. October pp. Windtest, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH, 2005: Report of acoustical emissions of a Siemens wind turbine generator system of the type 2.3 MW Mk II near Hovsore in Denmark. September Report WT 4498/05. 49

64 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision APPENDIX A TURBINE, RECEPTOR, VACANT LOT AND PARTICIPANT LOCATIONS This appendix contains lists of turbine, receptor, vacant lot surrogate receptor (VLSR), and participant locations. Coordinates are given in the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) Zone 17 North projection. The datum is North American Datum 1983 (NAD83, Canada). Turbines Project Name: Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Datum and Projection: NAD83 (Canada); UTM 17N Equipment Identifier Make and Model X(E,m) Y(N,m) Remarks T2 Siemens SWT (MP2126kW) GVWFP1&2 T3 Siemens SWT (MP2126kW) GVWFP1&2 T5 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP1&2 T6 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP1&2 T8 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP1&2 T13 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP1&2 T15 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP1&2 T23 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP1&2 T24 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP1&2 T101 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP3 T102 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP3 T103 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP3 T104 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP3 T105 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP3 T106 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP3 T107 Siemens SWT (MP2126kW) GVWFP3 T108 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP3 T109 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP3 50

65 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision T110 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP3 T112 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP3 T113 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP3 T114 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP3 T115 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP3 T117 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP3 T118 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP3 T120 Siemens SWT (MP2126kW) GVWFP3 T352 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T354 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T355 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T356 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T357 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T359 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T360 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T361 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T364 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T365 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T366 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T367 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T368 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T369 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T370 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T371 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T377 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T401 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T402 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T502 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T503 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF Transformer Stations Project Name: Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Datum and Projection: NAD83 (Canada); UTM 17N Equipment Identifier Make and Model X(E,m) Y(N,m) Remarks Tr119 To be determined GVWFP3 Tr25 Northern Transformer GVWFP1&2 Tr26 Northern Transformer GVWFP1&2 Tr504 Siemens TP Melancthon WF Tr505 Siemens TP Melancthon WF Points of Reception (Receptors) Table - Point of Reception Locations Project Name: Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Datum and Projection: NAD83 (Canada); UTM 17N Point of Reception Height NPC ID Description (m) Class X(E,m) Y(N,m) R2 Receptor R3 Receptor R4 Receptor R5 Receptor R6 Receptor

66 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision R8 Receptor R10 Receptor R11 Receptor R12 Receptor R13 Receptor R14 Receptor R15 Receptor R16 Receptor R17 Receptor R18 Receptor R19 Receptor R22 Receptor R26 Receptor R34 Receptor R44 Receptor R45 Receptor R48 Receptor R50 Receptor R51 Receptor R52 Receptor R55 Receptor R58 Receptor R72 Receptor R76 Receptor R77 Receptor R78 Receptor R80 Receptor R86 Receptor R89 Receptor R93 Receptor R95 Receptor R97 Receptor R99 Receptor R100 Receptor R101 Receptor R103 Receptor R109 Receptor R112 Receptor R113 Receptor R117 Receptor R118 Receptor R119 Receptor R120 Receptor R122 Receptor R124 Receptor R128 Receptor R134 Receptor R136 Receptor R139 Receptor R140 Receptor R143 Receptor R145 Receptor R146 Receptor R148 Receptor R149 Receptor R152 Receptor R156 Receptor R157 Receptor R158 Receptor R159 Receptor

67 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision R161 Receptor R164 Receptor R165 Receptor R169 Receptor R171 Receptor R173 Receptor R174 Receptor R177 Receptor R179 Receptor R182 Receptor R184 Receptor R190 Receptor R194 Receptor R198 Receptor R199 Receptor R202 Receptor R206 Church R210 Receptor R215 Receptor R216 Receptor R217 Receptor R219 Receptor R222 Receptor R226 Receptor R230 Receptor R231 Receptor R232 Receptor R233 Receptor R235 Receptor R236 Receptor R238 Receptor R239 Receptor R241 Receptor R243 Receptor R244 Receptor R245 Receptor R248 Receptor R249 Receptor R253 Receptor R254 Receptor R258 Receptor R263 Receptor R270 Receptor R304 Receptor R305 Receptor R306 Receptor R307 Receptor R308 Receptor R310 Receptor R311 Receptor R312 Receptor R313 Receptor R673 Receptor R1555 Receptor

68 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Vacant Lot Surrogate Receptors Table - Vacant Lot Surrogate Receptor Locations Project Name: Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Datum and Projection: NAD83 (Canada); UTM 17 Point of Reception Height NPC ID Description (m) Class X(E,m) Y(N,m) V360 VLSR V361 VLSR V366 VLSR V367 VLSR V374 VLSR V408 VLSR V409 VLSR V410 VLSR V411 VLSR V412 VLSR V414 VLSR V415 VLSR V416 VLSR V429 VLSR V446 VLSR V481 VLSR V482 VLSR V483 VLSR V484 VLSR V528 VLSR V608 VLSR V613 VLSR V614 VLSR V617 VLSR V618 VLSR V620 VLSR V621 VLSR V627 VLSR V668 VLSR V671 VLSR V672 VLSR V674 VLSR V677 VLSR V687 VLSR V692 VLSR V693 VLSR V725 VLSR V726 VLSR V727 VLSR V731 VLSR V732 VLSR V733 VLSR V734 VLSR V735 VLSR V1136 VLSR V1137 VLSR V1138 VLSR V1433 VLSR V1436 VLSR

69 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision V1487 VLSR V1493 VLSR V1496 VLSR V1512 VLSR V1519 VLSR V1521 VLSR V1526 VLSR V1527 VLSR V1528 VLSR V1531 VLSR V1544 VLSR V1546 VLSR V1553 VLSR V1556 VLSR V1557 VLSR Participating Receptors (Participants) Table - Participating Receptor Locations Project Name: Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Datum and Projection: NAD83 (Canada); UTM 17N Point of Reception Height NPC ID Description (m) Class X(E,m) Y(N,m) P75 Receptor P98 Receptor P111 Receptor P123 Receptor P125 Receptor P193 Receptor P204 Receptor P271 Receptor

70 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision APPENDIX B ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION The following documents have been included in this Appendix. Siemens Wind Power A/S: SWT , Rev.1, Max. Power 2221 kw Contract Acoustic Emission, Hub Height 99.5 m Ontario - Canada This document provides broadband, octave band, and tonality data for this model of the GVWFP3 project turbines. The noise data contained in this specification have been used for the noise assessment of the subject project. Siemens Wind Power A/S: SWT , Rev.1, Max. Power 2126 kw Contract Acoustic Emission, Hub Height 99.5 m Ontario - Canada This document provides broadband, octave band, and tonality data for this model of the GVWFP3 project turbines. The noise data contained in this specification have been used for the noise assessment of the subject project. Siemens Wind Power A/S: SWT , Max. Power 2221 kw Contract Acoustic Emission, Hub Height 99.5 m. This document provides broadband and octave band data for this model of the GVWFP1&2 project turbines. The noise data contained in this specification have been used for the noise assessment of the subject project. Siemens Wind Power A/S: SWT , Max. Power 2126 kw Contract Acoustic Emission, Hub Height 99.5 m. This document provides broadband and octave band data for this model of the GVWFP1&2 project turbines. The noise data contained in this specification have been used for the noise assessment of the subject project. 56

71 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Siemens Energy Inc.: Letter from Anders J. Jensen This letter provides a statement re. tonality for SWT turbines. GE Energy: Technical Documentation Wind turbine Generator System GE 1.5sl/sle 50 & 60 Hz Noise emission characteristics Normal operation according to IEC This document provides broadband, octave band, and tonality data for the Melancthon Wind Facility turbines. The noise data contained in this specification have been used for the noise assessment of the subject project. Note that for economy of space, three uninformative pages of this document have been omitted. 57

72 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision

73 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision

74 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision

75 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision

76 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision

77 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision

78 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision

79 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision

80 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision

81 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision END 67

82

83 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES This Report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. any person acting on its behalf: (a) (b) Makes any warranty or representation whatsoever, express or implied, (i) with respect to the use of any information, apparatus, method, process, or similar item disclosed in this report, including merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, or (ii) that such use does not infringe on or interfere with privately owned rights, including any party's intellectual property, or (iii) that this report is suitable to any particular user's circumstance, or Assumes responsibility for any damages or other liability whatsoever resulting from your selection or use of this report or any information, apparatus, method, process or similar item disclosed in this report. 2

84 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose Revision Revision Revision Brief Project Description Reporting Details Sound Level Limits for Wind Farms PROJECT LAYOUT Project Site Project Details Municipal Zoning Adjacent Projects Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & Phase 2 Wind Farm Project Melancthon Wind Facility Substations Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project Melancthon Wind Facility DESCRIPTION OF RECEPTORS Definition Determination Vacant Lots Methodology Concordance Table DESCRIPTION OF SOURCES Wind Turbines Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,772 kw) Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,648 kw) Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) Melancthon Wind Facility

85 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Transformer Substations Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project Melancthon Wind Facility NOISE EMISSION RATINGS Turbine Noise Definition Standard Wind Turbines Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,772 kw) Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,648 kw) Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) Melancthon Wind Facility GE Wind 1.5sle Turbine Site-Specific Vertical Wind Shear Exponent Substations Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Substation Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project Substation Melancthon Wind Facility Substation IMPACT ASSESSMENT Methodology Specific Parameters Additional parameters and conditions Results NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY TABLES NOISE LEVEL ISOPLETH MAP EXAMPLE CALCULATION Method of Calculation Example CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES APPENDIX A TURBINE, RECEPTOR, VACANT LOT AND PARTICIPANT LOCATIONS APPENDIX B ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION

86 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision List of Figures Figure 1-1 Project location map...7 Figure 2-1 Project site map...12 Figure 5-1 SWT (Max Power 2,772 kw) wind speed sensitivity test Figure 5-2 SWT (Max Power 2,648 kw) wind speed sensitivity test Figure dba noise isopleth map for 1.5 and 4.5 m receptor heights...43 List of Tables Table 3-1 GVWFP3 GVWFP1&2 receptor and VLSR concordance table...16 Table 5-1 Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,772 kw) Wind turbine acoustic emissions summary...24 Table 5-2 Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,648 kw) Wind turbine acoustic emissions summary...25 Table 5-3 Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) Wind turbine acoustic emissions summary...27 Table 5-4 Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) Wind turbine acoustic emissions summary...28 Table 5-5 GE Wind 1.5sle Wind turbine acoustic emissions summary...29 Table 5-6 GVWFP3 transformer acoustic emissions summary...30 Table 5-7 GVWFP1&2 transformer acoustic emissions summary...31 Table 5-8 Melancthon WF transformer acoustic emissions summary...32 Table 6-1 Highest noise levels at receptors...35 Table 7-1 Receptor noise level summary table...36 Table 7-2 Vacant lot surrogate receptor noise level summary table...39 Table 7-3 Participant noise level summary table...41 Table 9-1 Sample calculation for receptor and turbine...45 Table 9-2 Sample calculation for single receptor and multiple turbines

87 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose This Noise Assessment Report (NAR) describes the results of a noise impact study for Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc.'s proposed Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project (GVWFP3). 1.2 Revision Revision was the original Noise Assessment Report. 1.3 Revision For clarity in distinguishing them from Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project turbines, project turbines were renumbered. Turbines were added, and turbines were relocated. Also, some turbine model nomenclature was modified to correspond more closely to that used by the manufacturer. Melancthon Wind Facility substation transformers were added. Substation transformer data were updated. A concordance table between the Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project and Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project receptors was included. Updates and changes were made to receptor, participant, and VLSR data. Minor corrections, revisions, and updates were included. 1.4 Revision The present Revision (2-3.0) includes the following changes. Turbine models have been changed for the project layout described in this noise assessment report. All Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,897kW) turbines from 6

88 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision the layout described in the previous revision have been replaced by Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,772kW) models. All Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,710kW) turbines have been replaced by Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,648kW) models. Turbines T111 and T116 have been deleted from the project. The wind farm now consists of 17 turbines The location of turbine T102 has changed. However, it remains on the same property. The location of transformer Tr119 has changed. However, it remains on the same property. Based in part on feedback from the local community, updates, corrections, and changes have been made to receptor, participant and VLSR data. Minor corrections, revisions, and updates are included. 1.5 Brief Project Description The Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project will be located to the northwest of the town of Grand Valley in Dufferin County. The project described herein features 17 wind turbines with a nominal project capacity of 46.9 MW. During project final design, this will be limited to 40.0 MW through the removal or de-rating of turbines. Turbines from the Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project (GVWFP1&2) are interspersed with turbines of the subject project. Melancthon Wind Facility turbines are located to the northeast. Figure 1-1 shows the location of the project within the province of Ontario. 1.6 Reporting Details This report has been prepared to meet all reporting requirements related to wind project noise for a Renewable Energy Approval (REA) under the Green Energy and Green Economy Act 2009 (Government of Ontario, 2009) A noise impact assessment was carried out for this project under Section 55.(3) of O. Reg 359/09 (Government of Ontario, 2009b) and amendments (O.Reg. 521/10, Government of Ontario, 2010; O.Reg. 231/11, Government of Ontario, 2011; O.Reg. 195/12, Government of Ontario, 2012). The assessment methodology and Figure 1-1 Project location map. 7

89 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision calculations conform to the ISO International Standard (ISO, 1996). Results of the analysis have been interpreted using Ministry of Environment Guidelines (MoE, 2008). This latter document generally provides guidelines and clarifications for the application of MoE regulations document NPC-232 (MoE, 1995) to wind farm projects. The MoE (2008) Guidelines document prescribes receptor noise level limits based on an analysis of typical wind-induced background noise levels, and tabulates these limits as functions of the ambient 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 ms -1 wind speeds measured at 10 m above ground level (a.g.l.). Note that the receptor noise level limits must be met for noise produced by other project hardware such as substation transformers in addition to noise produced by the wind turbines. This report will show that the estimated noise levels generated by the project turbines and other hardware meet the MoE (2008) prescribed limits at all qualified receptors. 1.7 Sound Level Limits for Wind Farms MoE (2008) lists the sound level limits for wind farms (based on the NPC-205 and NPC-232 publications and a consideration of the background ambient windinduced sound level) as follows. Note that noise contributions from project switching, transformer, and substations must be included. Summary of Sound Level Limits for Wind Turbines Wind speed (ms -1 ) at 10 m height Wind turbine sound level limits Class 3 Area, dba Wind turbine sound level limits Class 1 Area, dba Reference wind induced background sound level L 90, dba

90 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision PROJECT LAYOUT 2.1 Project Site Figure 2-1 shows the Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project. Typical topographic map features along with project details are shown on the map. Within the project domain, the topography can be characterized as gently rolling with a topographic elevation in the project area of approximately 490 m above sea level (a.s.l). The surface roughness of the project domain is typical of Ontario rural terrain with a heterogeneous mixture of agricultural fields, woodlots, farm buildings, dwellings, and rural settlements. The primary activity in this area is agriculture. The GVWFP3 site features a population density typical of southern Ontario rural communities a relatively sparse population in the countryside except for a small number of settlement clusters (villages and towns). The town of Grand Valley lies immediately to the southeast of the project site. 2.2 Project Details Figure 2-1 shows the properties that have been optioned for lease to the project proponent (Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc.) along with prospective turbine, point of reception (receptor), vacant lot surrogate receptor (VLSR), participating point of reception (participant), and vacant lot locations. Turbine numbers are designated with the prefix T, receptors with R, VLSRs with V, and participants with P. As specified by O.Reg 359/09, the Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project is a Class 4 Wind Project. The GVWFP3 as described here will consist of 17 Siemens noise and power derated SWT turbines for a project capacity of approximately 46.9 MW. During project final design, this will be limited to 40.0 MW through the removal or derating of turbines. The specific turbine models proposed are the SWT (Max Power 2,772kW) and the SWT (Max Power 2,648kW). T101, T102, T103, 9

91 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision T104, T105, T106, T108, T109, T110, T112, T113, T114, T115, T117, T118 will be the proposed SWT (Max Power 2,772kW) model. Turbines T107 and T120 will be the proposed SWT (Max Power 2,648kW) model. Project turbines are numbered T101 through T120 in Figure 2-1. (Note that Tr119 is a project power transformer.) A listing of all GVWFP3 turbine locations can be found in Section 12 (Appendix A). The project stretches for a distance of about 12 km east-to-west and about 15 km north-to-south. The Ontario NPC designation for the project properties would generally be Class 3 Rural. Typical background sound levels for these areas would be generated by residential, agricultural, and small commercial activities, ambient sound from wind, and vehicle noise from regional roads. For the purpose of this report, all areas have been considered to be NPC Class Municipal Zoning Typically, the project area is zoned as Agricultural. 2.4 Adjacent Projects Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & Phase 2 Wind Farm Project Figure 2-1 also shows the locations of existing turbines in the Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc.'s Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & Phase 2 Wind Farm Project. These turbines are located generally to the north and on the eastern side of the Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project. The combination of Phase 1 and 2 projects is comprised of 9x Siemens noise and power derated SWT turbines. The specific models are the SWT (Max Power 2,221kW) and the SWT (Max Power 2,126kW) for a total project capacity of 19.8 MW. The Phase 1 and 2 turbines are numbered T2 to T24 in Figure 2-1 Details of these turbines are provided further below. All turbines in the Phase 1 and 2 projects within 5 km of any receptor of the GVWFP3 have been included in the noise assessment of the subject project Melancthon Wind Facility Figure 2-1 also shows the locations of existing turbines in the Trans-Alta Melancthon Wind Facility (MWF). These turbines are located mainly to the northeast. There is a total of 133 GE-1.5sle turbines in the MWF. Of these, 21 lie within 5 km of any receptor for the GVWFP3. The MWF turbines are numbered T352 to T503 in Figure 2-1. Details of the GE-1.5sle turbine are provided further below. All Melancthon Wind Facility turbines within 5 km of any receptor of the GVWFP3 have been included in this noise assessment of the subject project. 10

92 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Substations Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project The GVWFP3 will include a substation with a relatively small power transformer for conversion of the collection voltage to distribution-level voltage. This transformer is shown as Tr119 in Figure 2-1. Noise from this transformer has been included in all the reported noise calculations Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project The combination Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project is served by a single substation comprised of two relatively small power transformers for conversion of the collection voltage to distribution-level voltage. These transformers are shown as Tr25 and Tr26 in Figure 2-1. Noise from these transformers has been included in all the reported noise calculations Melancthon Wind Facility The Melancthon Wind Facility contains one substation with two large power transformers. These convert the project collection-level voltage to transmission system voltage (230 kv). They are shown in Figure 2-1 as Tr598 and Tr599. Noise from these transformers has been included in all the reported noise calculations. 11

93 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Figure 2-1 Project site map. 12

94 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision DESCRIPTION OF RECEPTORS 3.1 Definition Receptors (non-participating points of reception), vacant lot surrogate receptors (VLSRs), and participants (participating points of reception) are defined in Ontario MoE NPC-232 (MoE, 1995b) and Noise Guidelines (MoE, 2008) publications, and in Ontario O.Reg. 359/09 and proposed amendments (Government of Ontario; 2009b, 2010, 2011, 2012). 3.2 Determination Receptor and participant data (location, type, dwelling height, etc.) were supplied by Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. These were used in this noise assessment report. Receptors and participants were identified through mapping, aerial photographs, and on-site surveys of the area by a third party on behalf of Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. Typically, for this area receptors are residential dwellings of individuals and families not associated with the subject project. Section 12 (Appendix A) lists the locations and details of all known receptors and participants situated within the project area. Their locations are also shown in Figure 2-1. All receptors within 1.5 km of any GVWFP3 wind turbine or transformer have been included and reported in this noise impact analysis. All receptors have been considered to be designated as rural (NPC Class 3). For the purpose of this noise assessment, participants have been defined as dwellings occupied by landowners who receive financial compensation for the placement of project hardware (turbines, cables, roads, substations, etc.) on their properties. For information, 203 receptors, 134 VLSRs, and 8 participants (total 345) have been identified within 2 km of any GVWFP3 turbine; 178 vacant lots have also been identified within 2 km of any project turbine. 13

95 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Vacant Lots The MoE (2008) Noise Guidelines also require prediction of the noise levels on...vacant lots that have been zoned by the local municipality to permit residential or similar noise-sensitive uses.... Therefore, all vacant lots within 1.5 km of any turbine or substation in the GVWFP3 were identified as those lots defined by the complete set of cadastral parcel fabric which did not contain a receptor dwelling, nor a participant dwelling, nor project infrastructure (turbine, cable, substation, etc.), and were obviously not road rights-of-way, public property, industrial or commercial property, etc. A 1 ha building envelope within the vacant lot property that would reasonably be expected to contain the use, and that conforms with the municipal zoning by-laws in effect was also identified for each of the vacant lots by determining a location within the lot where the predicted noise level would be below the allowed maxima. A vacant lot surrogate receptor (VLSR) located in the 1 ha building envelope and designated with a height of 4.5 m was created for the purpose of noise estimation. The VLSRs are listed in Section 12 (Appendix A). 3.4 Methodology ISO modelling was carried out for all receptors, participants and VLSRs. Typically, a resultant sound pressure level for each receptor/ VLSR/participant is determined as stipulated in Section of MoE (2008) where there is no qualifying transformer within the project, and as stipulated in Section where there is a qualifying transformer. In the case of this project, which includes a substation, Section was used. The heights of dwellings designated as 1-, 2-, and 3-storeys were set to be 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 m respectively. For areas where there is such a high density of receptors that it would be impractical (and tedious for the reader) to include them all, a comprehensive selection of sample receptors (HDSRs, High Density Sample Receptors) were designated. These specific receptors were sampled so as to represent the cluster of all receptors in such a way that the sample receptors would be those subject to the maximum sound pressure levels from the surrounding turbines. Typically, receptors at all corners, along all boundaries, and in the centre of the high density cluster were chosen with (generally) a maximum separation of 200 m between sample receptors where possible. All sample receptors were assigned a height of 4.5 m to ensure that any 2-storey residences within the cluster were represented. As noted above, participating receptors (referred to herein as participants) have also been surveyed and are shown in Figure 2-1 and listed in Section 12 (Appendix A). Estimates of sound pressure levels were made for the participant locations. It should be noted that the receptors, participants and VLSRs listed in Section 12 include those that are closer than or equal to 1,500 m from any project turbine or qualifying substation transformer (if existent) noise source. 14

96 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Concordance Table As requested by MoE, a concordance table that rationalizes the identification of receptors and VLSRs between the GVWFP3 and the adjacent GVWFP1&2 has been included here. Table 3-1 lists receptors and VLSRs which are located mutually within 1.5 km of any wind turbine in the GVWFP3 and the GVWFP1&2. (Note that there were no mutual receptors with the neighbouring Melancthon Wind Facility.) The next paragraphs describe the concordance table s columns. The first pair of columns in the table lists the UTM coordinates (NAD83, UTM17N) of the receptor or VLSR as determined for the GVWFP3. The second pair of columns lists the coordinates as provided by HGC Engineering (2013) and listed in the GVWFP1&2 noise assessment report. Note that for receptors, the values in these pairs of columns are generally only slightly different. The differences can be attributed to the choice of the exact location of the dwelling in question and the precision of the GIS data including base mapping and air or satellite photography. However, in the case of VLSRs, the locations can be significantly different since the VLSR need only be located on the vacant property in question, although it must be surrounded by at least 1 ha of available land, zoned to permit residential or similar uses, conform with local building codes, and be consistent with the typical building pattern in the area. In some instances, it is possible for the two project designers to reasonably choose two VLSRs which are hundreds of metres apart but still located on the same vacant lot property. Note that there are some receptors and VLSRs in each of the projects that do not appear to have matches in the other project. These have been indicated by n/a in the table. The fifth column in the table lists the distance between the two locations (GVWFP3 designated or GVWFP1&2 designated) determined for the receptor or VLSR. The next pair of columns lists the receptor or VLSR identifier first as used for the GVWFP3, and second as used for the GVWFP1&2. Naturally, these would not be expected to be the same. As noted above, there are some receptors/vlsrs that are found in one project and not in the other. Again, this is indicated by n/a. The next pair of columns lists the distances from the receptor or VLSR to the nearest noise source (turbine or transformer) first for the GVWFP3, and second for the GVWFP1&2. While it might seem logical that these distances should be identical for receptors, again the precision of the receptor location as discussed above can lead to different results where the receptor is almost equidistant from two different noise sources. In the case of VLSRs, the differences can be significant since, as noted previously, VLSRs for each of the projects can be located in quite different places on the same vacant lot. The next three columns list the receptor/vlsr sound pressure levels the first for the case where only GVWFP3 noise sources are included, the second where only GVWFP1&2 noise sources are included, and the third where noise sources from both projects are included. Note that the sound pressure levels are listed for the 15

97 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision GVWFP3 receptor/vlsr locations. They have not been determined for the GVWFP1&2 receptor/vlsr locations. In most cases, these should be quite similar but there could be significant differences where there is a substantial separation between GVWFP3/GVWFP1&2 receptor/vlsr pairs. This would more likely occur in the case of the VLSRs. Note that the Total Level has been determined from a full analysis including both the GVWFP3 and the GVWFP1&2 noise sources at GVWFP3 receptors/vlsrs. Table 3-1 GVWFP3 GVWFP1&2 receptor and VLSR concordance table. UTM coordinates GVWFP3 Easting (m) Northing (m) Easting (m) UTM coordinates GVWFP 1&2 Northing (m) Difference (m) Noise receptor ID GVWFP3 GVWFP 1&2 GVWFP3 Distance to nearest source (m) Nearest source ID Level of farm (dba) GVWFP 1&2 GVWFP3 GVWFP 1&2 GVWFP3 Level (dba) GVWFP 1&2 Total 552,385 4,868,686 n/a n/a n/a V618 n/a 1436 n/a T105 n/a 29.4 n/a n/a 552,467 4,868, ,467 4,868, R169 RV T105 T ,560 4,868, ,561 4,868,629 1 R173 R T105 T n/a n/a 553,028 4,869,160 n/a n/a R030 n/a 1264 n/a T8 n/a n/a n/a 553,121 4,869, ,119 4,869,327 2 R190 R T105 T ,400 4,869,276 n/a n/a n/a R1555 n/a 896 n/a T105 n/a 35.5 n/a n/a 553,287 4,868, ,287 4,868,875 1 P193 R T105 T ,612 4,868, ,611 4,868,939 1 R202 R T120 T n/a n/a 553,617 4,868,755 n/a n/a RV09 n/a 957 n/a T6 n/a n/a n/a 553,653 4,868, ,658 4,868,496 6 R206 R T120 T

98 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision DESCRIPTION OF SOURCES 4.1 Wind Turbines Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project The turbines proposed for the GVWFP3 are manufactured by Siemens Wind Systems A/S ( of Germany. Siemens Wind Power A/S is a relative newcomer to the ranks of wind turbine manufacturers. However, it entered the market by purchasing the long-standing and experienced Bonus turbine manufacturing company. The turbine models proposed for the GVWFP3 are noiseand power-reduced variants of the SWT Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,772 kw) The Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,772 kw) is a noise- and power-reduced member of the Siemens SWT turbine family. The following table summarizes this turbine s characteristics. Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,772 KW) Type, number of blades, rotor orientation horizontal-axis, 3-bladed, upwind wind turbine Rated power 2,772 kw Rotor diameter; swept area m; 10,000 m 2 Operational rotation rate 6.0 to 15.5 rpm; variable speed Hub height; tower type 99.5 m; steel tubular tower Power regulation pitch regulation with variable speed Cut-in wind speed 3 to 5 ms -1 Cut-out wind speed 25 ms -1 Rated wind speed 12 to 13 ms -1 Gearbox no 17

99 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,772 KW) Generator; speed Turbine transformer Braking system Yaw system synchronous permanent magnet generator external transformer; step-up transformer on concrete pad at the base of the turbine aerodynamic primary brake by full-span pitching with hydraulic activation active, externally geared, passive friction brake Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,648 kw) The Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,648 kw) is a noise- and power-reduced member of the Siemens SWT turbine family. The following table summarizes this turbine s characteristics. Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,648 KW) Type, number of blades, rotor orientation horizontal-axis, 3-bladed, upwind wind turbine Rated power 2,648 kw Rotor diameter; swept area m; 10,000 m 2 Operational rotation rate 6.0 to 15.5 rpm; variable speed Hub height; tower type 99.5 m; steel tubular tower Power regulation pitch regulation with variable speed Cut-in wind speed 3 to 5 ms -1 Cut-out wind speed 25 ms -1 Rated wind speed 12 to 13 ms -1 Gearbox no Generator; speed synchronous permanent magnet generator Turbine transformer external transformer; step-up transformer on concrete pad at the base of the turbine Braking system aerodynamic primary brake by full-span pitching with hydraulic activation Yaw system active, externally geared, passive friction brake Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project In addition to the GVWFP3 turbines, there are 7x Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) and 2x Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126k W) turbines in the Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project. Information on the rating and noise characteristics of these turbines has been supplied by Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. 18

100 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision All of the Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project turbines have been included in the present assessment Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) The following table describes this turbine's major characteristics. Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) Type, number of blades, rotor orientation horizontal-axis, 3-bladed, upwind wind turbine Rated power 2,221 kw Rotor diameter; swept area m; 8,000 m 2 Operational rotation rate 6.0 to 16.0 rpm; variable speed Hub height; tower type 99.5 m; steel tubular tower Power regulation pitch regulation with variable speed Cut-in wind speed 4 ms -1 Cut-out wind speed 25 ms -1 Rated wind speed 12 to 13 ms -1 Gearbox yes; 3 stage planetary/helical Generator; speed asynchronous with squirrel-cage rotor, without slip rings; variable speed Turbine transformer internal transformer aerodynamic primary brake by full-span Braking system feathering of individual blades; mechanical disk brake on high-speed shaft which has two hydraulic calipers Yaw system active electric externally geared slewring; passive friction brake Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) The following table describes this turbine's major characteristics. Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) Type, number of blades, rotor orientation horizontal-axis, 3-bladed, upwind wind turbine Rated power 2,126 kw Rotor diameter; swept area m; 8,000 m 2 Operational rotation rate 6.0 to 16.0 rpm; variable speed Hub height; tower type 99.5 m; steel tubular tower Power regulation pitch regulation with variable speed Cut-in wind speed 4 ms -1 Cut-out wind speed 25 ms -1 19

101 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,126 kw) Rated wind speed 12 to 13 ms -1 Gearbox yes; 3 stage planetary/helical Generator; speed asynchronous with squirrel-cage rotor, without slip rings; variable speed Turbine transformer internal transformer aerodynamic primary brake by full-span Braking system feathering of individual blades; mechanical disk brake on high-speed shaft which has two hydraulic calipers Yaw system active electric externally geared slewring; passive friction brake Melancthon Wind Facility There are 21 GE Wind 1.5sle turbines in the Melancthon Wind Facility within 5,000 m of any Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project receptors. All of these turbines have been included in the present assessment. The following table describes the turbine's major characteristics. GE Wind 1.5sle Type, number of blades, rotor orientation horizontal-axis, 3-bladed, upwind wind turbine Rated power 1,500 kw Rotor diameter; swept area 77.0 m; 4,657 m 2 Operational rotation rate 10.1 to 20.4 rpm; variable speed Hub height; tower type 80.0 m; steel tubular tower Individual full span pitch control; variable speed Power regulation with pulse-width modulated IGBT frequency converter Cut-in wind speed 3.5 ms -1 Cut-out wind speed 25 ms -1 Rated wind speed 12 ms -1 Gearbox yes; 3 stage planetary/helical Generator; speed Asynchronous; double fed induction; 1,500 to 1,800 rpm Turbine transformer External transformer; step-up transformer on concrete pad at the base of the turbine Braking system aerodynamic primary brake by feathering blades; emergency hydraulic disc brake Yaw system electromechanical 20

102 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Transformer Substations Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project A single transformer is proposed for the single substation included in this project. The substation location is shown in Figure 2-1 as Tr119. At the present stage of this project, Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. states that only limited information is available for the transformer. Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. has undertaken to provide a full description of the substation and transformer as soon as details are finalized. Noise characteristics and additional details are provided in Section Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project There is a pair of Northern Transformer Incorporated 7.5/10.0 MVA ONAN/ONAF transformers located at the GVWFP1&2 substation. These are shown in Figure 2-1 as Tr25 and Tr26. There are only limited details of these transformers available in the GVWFP1&2 project noise assessment report (HGC Engineering, 2011). Noise characteristics and additional details of these transformers are given in Section Melancthon Wind Facility There are two collocated transformers at one substation in the Melancthon Wind Facility. These are shown in Figure 2-1 as Tr504 and Tr505. There are only limited details available in the project noise assessment reports (Helimax Energy Inc., 2006, 2007) for the MWF. However, it has been determined that both transformers are presently 100 MVA Siemens TP-720 models. (The firstinstalled transformer had been replaced in 2008.) It is also understood that both transformers are now surrounded by a single, continuous acoustic barrier. The operating voltages of the transformers are 34.5 kv (low side) and 230 kv (high side). The transformers are each rated at 100 MVA. Noise characteristics and additional details of these transformers are given in Section

103 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision NOISE EMISSION RATINGS 5.1 Turbine Noise Definition Standard The commonly accepted global wind turbine noise definition Standard is IEC (IEC, 2002). The MoE (2008) Guidelines require that,...acoustic emission information must be determined and reported in accordance with the international standard CAN/CSA-C Fortunately, these two Standards are completely equivalent as confirmed in the preamble to the description of the CAN/CSA-C Standard (CSA, 2007) as follows. CSA Preface This is the first edition of CAN/CSA-C , Wind turbine generator systems - Part 11: Acoustic noise measurement techniques, which is an adoption without modification of the identically titled IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) Standard (edition 2:2002 consolidated with amendment 1:2006). At the time of publication, IEC :2002+A1:2006 is available from IEC in English only. CSA will publish the French version when it becomes available from IEC. In this report, the IEC and CAN/CSA-C Standards have been used interchangeably. 5.2 Wind Turbines Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,772 kw) Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,772 kw) turbine source sound power level broadband data for 10 m wind speeds of 4 to 12 ms -1 to cut-out (25 ms -1 ) and octave band data for 10 m wind speeds of 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 ms -1 were provided in Siemens Wind Power A/S documentation supplied by Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. This documentation is shown in Section 13 (Appendix B). The broadband and octave band noise information was used with a power law wind shear exponent of 0.50 (see below for derivation) to synthesize / interpolate / 22

104

105

106

107 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) turbine source sound power level broadband data for 10 m wind speeds of 3 ms -1 to turbine cutout (25 ms -1 ) and octave band data for 10 m wind speeds of 6 and 8 ms -1 were provided in Siemens A/S documentation supplied by Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. The documentation confirms that the source noise values were obtained...with reference to the code IEC with amendment 1 dated This documentation is shown in Section 13 (Appendix B). The broadband and octave band noise information was used with the site-specific power law wind shear exponent of 0.50 (see below for derivation) to synthesize / interpolate / extrapolate octave band source sound power levels for 10 m a.g.l. wind speeds of 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 ms -1 for use in the ISO estimates of receptor noise levels. Siemens states in a private communication (A. Jensen, 2011/01/10), The Wind test Report WT 4498/05 [see Windtest, 2005 in References] for the SWT wind turbine generator is relevant for assessment of the SWT wind turbine generator tonality as the nacelle and frequency converter are identical for both the SWT and the SWT There are no other components on the SWT that result in ascertainable tonalities determined in accordance with IEC No tonal penalty has been applied to this turbine. The 10 m a.g.l. broadband and octave band source sound power levels for the Siemens SWT (Max Power 2,221 kw) turbine for a hub height of 99.5 m are shown in Table 5-3. Note that the Manufacturer s emission levels for octave band source sound power levels were provided only for 6 and 8 ms -1. For 7 ms -1, octave band sound power levels have been interpolated; the 9 and 10 ms -1 sound power levels have been set equal to the 8 ms -1 sound power levels. 26

108

109

110

111 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision adjustments for hub-height winds speeds with respect to determination of Adjusted emission levels. 5.4 Substations Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Substation As noted above, only limited details are available at this time for the transformer source noise for the GVWFP3 substation. However, Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. has undertaken to ensure that the procurement specification for this transformer will stipulate a maximum broadband source sound power level of 88 dba. In addition, Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. may choose to further mitigate the transformer noise transmission with sound barriers. Grand Valley Wind Farms Inc. has also undertaken to transmit all required information to the Ministry as soon as it is available. For design purposes, octave band source sound power levels characteristic of a typical power transformer were adjusted to reflect the specified broadband level (88 dba). They are listed in Error: Reference source not found along with source sound power levels that include a 5 db tonal penalty (for all octave bands, for an overall penalty of 5 db). The tonal penalty was included in this assessment. No attenuation due to sound barriers has been included in this assessment. As noted above, noise (including the tonal penalty) from this substation transformer was used in all calculations. Table 5-6 GVWFP3 transformer acoustic emissions summary. Make and Model: To be finalized Operating voltage: 34.5 / 230 kv Rating: 45 MVA Core tank size: To be finalized Source height (m): 4.0 (to be finalized) Source location: outside Sound characteristics: steady, tonal Noise control measures: uncontrolled Frequency Source sound power level Tonal penalty (Hz) (dblin) (db) (dblin) Broadband (dba) Net source sound power level

112 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 1 & 2 Wind Farm Project Substation There is a pair of Northern Transformer Incorporated 7.5/10.0 MVA ONAN/ONAF transformers located at the GVWFP1&2 substation. Only limited noise information with respect to those transformers is available from that project s noise assessment report (HGC Engineering, 2011). However, it is known that it was designed to a limiting broadband source sound power level of approximately 88.4 dba. A summary of the acoustic emissions characteristics as provided in that project s noise assessment report is contained in Table 5-7. Noise (including the tonal penalty) from these transformers was used in all calculations Melancthon Wind Facility Substation Only limited information with respect to the pair of Melancthon Wind Facility transformers is available from that project s noise assessment reports (Helimax Energy Inc., 2006, 2007). However, it has been determined that both transformers are presently 100 MVA Siemens TP-720 models. (The first-installed transformer had been replaced in 2008.) It is also understood that both transformers are now surrounded by a single, continuous acoustic barrier. It is known (Helimax Energy Inc., 2006) that the original design of the project included a transformer broadband source sound power level specification of 83 dba, so, for design purposes, octave band source sound power levels characteristic of a typical power transformer were adjusted to reflect this specified broadband level. They are listed in Table 5-8 along with source sound power levels that include a 5 db tonal penalty (for all octave bands, for an overall penalty of 5 db). The tonal penalty was included in this assessment. No attenuation due to sound barriers for these transformers has been included in this assessment. Noise from these transformers was used in all calculations. Table 5-7 GVWFP1&2 transformer acoustic emissions summary. Make and Model: Northern Transformer Incorporated. ONAN/ONAF Sealed Transformer Operating voltage: 34.5 / 44 kv Rating: 7.5 / 10 MVA Core tank size: 5,978 l Source height (m): Unknown (4.0 used) Source location: outside Sound characteristics: steady, tonal Noise control measures: uncontrolled Frequency Source sound power level Tonal penalty (Hz) (dblin) (db) (dblin) Broadband (dba) Net source sound power level

113 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Table 5-8 Melancthon WF transformer acoustic emissions summary. Make and Model: Siemens TP-720 AC power transformer Operating voltage: 34.5 kv / 230 kv Rating: 100 MVA Core tank size: Unknown Source height (m): Unknown (4.0 used) Source location: outside Sound characteristics: steady, tonal Noise control measures: acoustic barrier Frequency Source sound power level Tonal penalty (Hz) (dblin) (db) (dblin) Broadband (dba) Net source sound power level

114 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision IMPACT ASSESSMENT 6.1 Methodology Cumulative turbine and transformer sound levels were estimated at each of the receptors using the methodology of the ISO Standard (ISO, 1996). Wind turbine and transformer (where existent) octave band and A-weighted sound power values, standardized meteorological conditions, turbine/transformer locations, receptor / VLSR / participant locations, and characteristics were used to determine the A-weighted sound pressure levels at all receptors. 6.2 Specific Parameters a) Analysis was carried out for turbine source sound power levels in eight octave bands (63 to 8,000 Hz) corresponding to 10 m (a.g.l.) ambient wind speeds of 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 ms -1. b) ISO parameters, as prescribed in the MoE (2008) Noise Guidelines were set as follows: Ambient air temperature: 10 C Ambient humidity: 70 % The required atmospheric attenuation coefficients to be used in the ISO modelling of noise propagation are prescribed in MoE (2008). These have been used in the present assessment, and are shown in the following table. Atmospheric Absorption Coefficients Centre Octave Band Frequency (Hz) Atmospheric Absorption Coefficient (db/km) from MoE (2008)

115 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision c) The ISO Standard term for Ground Attenuation was calculated using the General Method (Section of the Standard). Ground factors were assigned the following values. Source ground factor: 1.0 (soft ground) Middle ground factor: 0.8 (soft ground) Receptor ground factor: 0.5 (hard/soft ground) 6.3 Additional parameters and conditions Sound pressure levels were not calculated for any receptor for which there was no GVWFP3 turbine or transformer (if existent) closer than 1,500 m. For any receptor, turbines or transformers (if existent) further than 5,000 m away were not included in the calculations. No additional adjustments were made for wind speed or direction since the ISO Standard assumes worst-case conditions for these parameters with respect to noise impact. 6.4 Results Results are reported in Tables 7-1, 7-2, and 7-3 found in Section 7 and the noise level isopleth map of Section 8. As a brief summary, Table 6-1 below is a sorted list of the receptors and VLSRs with the 25 highest sound pressure levels determined in the analysis. 34

116 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Table 6-1 Highest noise levels at receptors. Receptor ID SPrL (dba) Height (m) Nearest Turbine Project / Other Distance (m) R T8 O 552 R T6 O 597 V T6 O 715 R T6 O 652 R Tr119 P 579 V T107 P 596 R T120 P 569 R T8 O 655 R T6 O 600 R T8 O 662 R Tr119 P 373 R T115 P 560 R T120 P 578 R T114 P 581 V T120 P 568 R T8 O 692 R T112 P 568 R T8 O 653 V T8 O 736 R T115 P 610 V T115 P 645 R T115 P 706 R T8 O 650 V T106 P 691 V T107 P 599 V T110 P 555 WindFarm layout file: VGV11-Trbn-WFL018-SWT-3p0-113.csv 35

117 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY TABLES Table 7-1 Receptor noise level summary table. Point of Reception ID Description Height (m) Distance to Nearest Turbine (m) Nearest Turbine Calculated Sound Level at Selected Wind Speeds (dba) Sound Level Limit (dba) R2 Receptor T R3 Receptor T R4 Receptor T R5 Receptor T R6 Receptor T R8 Receptor T R10 Receptor T R11 Receptor T R12 Receptor T R13 Receptor T R14 Receptor T R15 Receptor T R16 Receptor T R17 Receptor T R18 Receptor T R19 Receptor T R22 Receptor T R26 Receptor T R34 Receptor T R44 Receptor T R45 Receptor T R48 Receptor T R50 Receptor T R51 Receptor T R52 Receptor T R55 Receptor T R58 Receptor T R72 Receptor T R76 Receptor T R77 Receptor T

118 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Point of Reception ID Description Height (m) Distance to Nearest Turbine (m) Nearest Turbine Calculated Sound Level at Selected Wind Speeds (dba) Sound Level Limit (dba) R78 Receptor T R80 Receptor T R86 Receptor T R89 Receptor T R93 Receptor T R95 Receptor T R97 Receptor T R99 Receptor T R100 Receptor T R101 Receptor T R103 Receptor T R109 Receptor T R112 Receptor T R113 Receptor T R117 Receptor T R118 Receptor T R119 Receptor T R120 Receptor T R122 Receptor T R124 Receptor T R128 Receptor T R134 Receptor T R136 Receptor T R139 Receptor T R140 Receptor T R143 Receptor T R145 Receptor T R146 Receptor T R148 Receptor T R149 Receptor T R152 Receptor T R156 Receptor T R157 Receptor T R158 Receptor T R159 Receptor T R161 Receptor T R164 Receptor T R165 Receptor T R169 Receptor T R171 Receptor T R173 Receptor T R174 Receptor T R177 Receptor T R179 Receptor T R182 Receptor T R184 Receptor T R190 Receptor Tr R194 Receptor T R198 Receptor T

119 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Point of Reception ID Description Height (m) Distance to Nearest Turbine (m) Nearest Turbine Calculated Sound Level at Selected Wind Speeds (dba) Sound Level Limit (dba) R199 Receptor T R202 Receptor Tr R206 Church Tr R210 Receptor Tr R215 Receptor T R216 Receptor T R217 Receptor T R219 Receptor T R222 Receptor T R226 Receptor T R230 Receptor T R231 Receptor T R232 Receptor T R233 Receptor T R235 Receptor T R236 Receptor T R238 Receptor T R239 Receptor T R241 Receptor T R243 Receptor T R244 Receptor T R245 Receptor T R248 Receptor T R249 Receptor T R253 Receptor T R254 Receptor T R258 Receptor T R263 Receptor T R270 Receptor T R304 Receptor T R305 Receptor T R306 Receptor T R307 Receptor T R308 Receptor T R310 Receptor T R311 Receptor T R312 Receptor T R313 Receptor T R673 Receptor T R1555 Receptor Tr

120 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Table 7-2 Vacant lot surrogate receptor noise level summary table. Point of Reception ID Description Height (m) Distance to Nearest Turbine (m) Nearest Turbine Calculated Sound Level at Selected Wind Speeds (dba) Sound Level Limit (dba) V360 VLSR T V361 VLSR T V366 VLSR T V367 VLSR T V374 VLSR T V408 VLSR T V409 VLSR T V410 VLSR T V411 VLSR T V412 VLSR T V414 VLSR T V415 VLSR T V416 VLSR T V429 VLSR T V446 VLSR T V481 VLSR T V482 VLSR T V483 VLSR T V484 VLSR T V528 VLSR T V608 VLSR T V613 VLSR T V614 VLSR T V617 VLSR T V618 VLSR T V620 VLSR T V621 VLSR T V627 VLSR T V668 VLSR T V671 VLSR T V672 VLSR T V674 VLSR T V677 VLSR T V687 VLSR T V692 VLSR T V693 VLSR T V725 VLSR T V726 VLSR T V727 VLSR T V731 VLSR T V732 VLSR T V733 VLSR T V734 VLSR T V735 VLSR T V1136 VLSR T

121 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Point of Reception ID Description Height (m) Distance to Nearest Turbine (m) Nearest Turbine Calculated Sound Level at Selected Wind Speeds (dba) Sound Level Limit (dba) V1137 VLSR T V1138 VLSR T V1433 VLSR T V1436 VLSR T V1487 VLSR T V1493 VLSR T V1496 VLSR T V1512 VLSR T V1519 VLSR T V1521 VLSR T V1526 VLSR T V1527 VLSR T V1528 VLSR T V1531 VLSR T V1544 VLSR T V1546 VLSR T V1553 VLSR T V1556 VLSR T V1557 VLSR T V1519 VLSR T V1521 VLSR T V1526 VLSR T V1527 VLSR T V1528 VLSR T V1529 VLSR T V1530 VLSR T V1531 VLSR T V1544 VLSR T V1546 VLSR T V1547 VLSR T V1553 VLSR T V1556 VLSR T V1557 VLSR T

122 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Table 7-3 Participant noise level summary table. Participating Receptor ID Description Height (m) Distance to Nearest Turbine (m) Nearest Turbine ID Calculated Sound Level at Selected Wind Speeds (dba) P75 Receptor T P98 Receptor T P111 Receptor T P123 Receptor T P125 Receptor T P193 Receptor Tr P204 Receptor T P271 Receptor T

123 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision NOISE LEVEL ISOPLETH MAP Figure 8-1 is a noise-level isopleth map of the A-weighted 40 dba sound pressure levels (dba) generated by all qualified sources over the project region. Note that this map does not correspond to any specific 10 m a.g.l. wind speed. This is because the MoE predictable worst case (or equivalent for neighbouring turbines) octave band source sound power levels have been used for the project and neighbouring turbine types (see Section 5.2 ). The noise levels are calculated for receptors with 1.5 m (1 storey) and 4.5 m (2 storeys) heights. 42

124 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Figure dba noise isopleth map for 1.5 and 4.5 m receptor heights. 43

125 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision EXAMPLE CALCULATION 9.1 Method of Calculation The calculation of cumulative receptor noise levels from turbines and transformers uses the methodology of ISO (ISO, 1996). The calculation is based on equation (5) from ISO shown here: where L AT (DW) is the equivalent continuous A-weighted downwind sound pressure level at a receptor location, n is the number of turbines, A f (j) is the standard A-weighting for octave band j, j is an index indicating the eight standard octave-band mid-band frequencies from 63 Hz to 8 khz, L ft (ij) L ft (DW) is the equivalent continuous downwind octave-band sound pressure level at a receptor location for turbine i and octave band j, and is given by where L AT DW =10 log 10{ i=1 L W is the octave-band sound power level, in decibels, produced by the point sound source relative to a reference sound power of one picowatt, D C is the directivity correction in decibels, n L ft DW = L W D C A [ [ L ft ij A f j=1 j ]]} 44

126 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision A is the octave-band attenuation, in decibels, that occurs during propagation from the turbine to receptor, and is given by where A div is the attenuation due to geometrical divergence, A atm is the attenuation due to atmospheric absorption, A gr is the attenuation due to the ground effect, A bar is the attenuation due to a barrier, A misc is the attenuation due to miscellaneous other effects, A atm is given by A= A div A atm A gr A bar A misc A = d 1000 where α is the atmospheric attenuation coefficient, in decibels per kilometre, for each octave band at the midband frequency, d is the distance from the turbine to the receptor. Note also that A bar and A misc are not used here. 9.1 Example The following sample calculation presents intermediate octave-band results of calculations for A- weighted sound pressure levels. All model parameters are the same as previously tabulated. Table 9-1 lists the intermediate sound pressure levels calculated at receptor R112 due to the single turbine T115. Receptor and turbine are separated by 560 m. Note Table 9-1 Sample calculation for receptor and turbine. Intermediate calculations for receptor R112 and turbine T115 Mid-band Octave frequency L ft (DW) band (Hz) L W (dba) A div (db) A atm (db) A gr (db) (dba)

127 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision that the resultant A-weighted sound pressure level at R112 due to turbine T115 alone is 36.0 dba. In the table: L W is the octave-band sound power level, in decibels, produced by the point sound source relative to a reference sound power of one picowatt, A div is the attenuation due to geometrical divergence, A atm is the attenuation due to atmospheric absorption, A gr is the attenuation due to the ground effect,l ft (DW) is the equivalent continuous downwind octave-band sound pressure level. Table 9-2 shows intermediate octave band values of the calculations for the A- weighted sound pressure levels at receptor R112 due to all turbines and transformers (if existent) within 5,000 m of the receptor. The resultant A-weighted sound pressure level at R112 due to all turbines is 38.6 dba. Table 9-2 Sample calculation for single receptor and multiple turbines. Turbine ID Distance (m) Intermediate calculations for R112 and multiple turbines Turbine L ft contribution (db) in frequency band (Hz) Turbine L AT (dba) T T T T T T T

128 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision CONCLUSIONS This noise impact assessment for the proposed Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project has determined that the estimated sound pressure levels at receptors and vacant lot surrogate receptors (VLSRs) in the project area comply with the Ontario Ministry of Environment sound level limits at all qualified points of reception. 47

129 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision REFERENCES Canadian Standards Association (CSA), 2007: CAN/CSA-C Wind Turbine Generator Systems Part 11: Acoustic Noise Measurement Techniques (Adopted IEC : A1:2006, edition 2.1, ). Government of Ontario, 1990: Environmental Assessment Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter E Government of Ontario, 1990: Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter E Government of Ontario, 2009: Green Energy Act, 2009, search=browsestatutes&context=#bk7 Government of Ontario, 2009b: Ontario Regulation 359/09, made under the Environmental Protection Act, Renewable Energy Approvals under Part V.0.1 of the Act b33d386b4/1/frame/?search=browseStatutes&context= Government of Ontario, 2010, O.Reg. 521/10 made under the Environmental Protection Act amending O.Reg. 359/09. Government of Ontario, 2011, O.Reg. 231/11 made under the Environmental Protection Act amending O.Reg. 359/09. Government of Ontario, 2012, O.Reg. 195/12 made under the Environmental Protection Act amending O.Reg. 359/09. Helimax Energy Inc., 2006: Environmental Noise Impact Assessment, Melancthon II Project. GL Garrad Hassan Canada Inc., 4100 rue Molson, Bureau 100, Montréal, Quebec, H1Y 3N1. Tel Fax

130 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Helimax Energy Inc., 2007: Environmental Noise Impact Assessment Addendum, Melancthon II Project. GL Garrad Hassan Canada Inc., 4100 rue Molson, Bureau 100, Montréal, Quebec, H1Y 3N1. Tel Fax HGC Engineering, 2011: Grand Valley Wind Farm Project, Grand Valley Ontario. Howe Gastmeier Chapnik Limited, 2000 Argentia Road, Plaza 1, Suite 203, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 1P7. Tel HGC Engineering, 2013: Private on 2013/02/01 from HGC Engineering including spreadsheet listing of receptors, participants, and VLSRs from original Grand Valley Wind Farm Phase 1 & 2 Noise Assessment Report. Howe Gastmeier Chapnik Limited, 2000 Argentia Road, Plaza 1, Suite 203, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 1P7. Tel International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), 2002: International Standard, Wind turbine generator systems Part 11: Acoustic noise measurement techniques. Second edition International Standards Organization (ISO), 1993: International Standard: Acoustics Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors Part 1: Calculation of the absorption of sound by the atmosphere. International Standards Organization (ISO), 1996: International Standard: Acoustics Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors Part 2: General method of calculation. Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MoE), 1995a: Sound Level Limits for Stationary Sources in Class 1 & 2 Areas (Urban) Publication NPC-205. October Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MoE), 1995b: Sound Level Limits for Stationary Sources in Class 3 Areas (Rural) Publication NPC-232. October Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MoE), 2008: MoE Noise Guidelines for Wind Farms; Interpretation for Applying MOE NPC Publications to Wind Power Generation Facilities. October pp. Windtest, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Koog GmbH, 2005: Report of acoustical emissions of a Siemens wind turbine generator system of the type 2.3 MW Mk II near Hovsore in Denmark. September Report WT 4498/05. 49

131 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision APPENDIX A TURBINE, RECEPTOR, VACANT LOT AND PARTICIPANT LOCATIONS This appendix contains lists of turbine, receptor, vacant lot surrogate receptor (VLSR), and participant locations. Coordinates are given in the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) Zone 17 North projection. The datum is North American Datum 1983 (NAD83, Canada). Turbines Project Name: Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Datum and Projection: NAD83 (Canada); UTM 17N Equipment Identifier Make and Model X(E,m) Y(N,m) Remarks T2 Siemens SWT (MP2126kW) GVWFP1&2 T3 Siemens SWT (MP2126kW) GVWFP1&2 T5 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP1&2 T6 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP1&2 T8 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP1&2 T13 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP1&2 T15 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP1&2 T23 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP1&2 T24 Siemens SWT (MP2221kW) GVWFP1&2 T101 Siemens SWT (MP27720kW) GVWFP3 T102 Siemens SWT (MP27720kW) GVWFP3 T103 Siemens SWT (MP27720kW) GVWFP3 T104 Siemens SWT (MP27720kW) GVWFP3 T105 Siemens SWT (MP27720kW) GVWFP3 T106 Siemens SWT (MP27720kW) GVWFP3 T107 Siemens SWT (MP26480kW) GVWFP3 T108 Siemens SWT (MP27720kW) GVWFP3 T109 Siemens SWT (MP27720kW) GVWFP3 50

132 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision T110 Siemens SWT (MP27720kW) GVWFP3 T112 Siemens SWT (MP27720kW) GVWFP3 T113 Siemens SWT (MP27720kW) GVWFP3 T114 Siemens SWT (MP27720kW) GVWFP3 T115 Siemens SWT (MP27720kW) GVWFP3 T117 Siemens SWT (MP27720kW) GVWFP3 T118 Siemens SWT (MP27720kW) GVWFP3 T120 Siemens SWT (MP26480kW) GVWFP3 T352 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T354 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T355 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T356 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T357 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T359 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T360 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T361 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T364 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T365 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T366 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T367 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T368 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T369 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T370 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T371 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T377 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T401 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T402 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T502 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF T503 GE Wind 1.5sle Melancthon WF Transformer Stations Project Name: Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Datum and Projection: NAD83 (Canada); UTM 17N Equipment Identifier Make and Model X(E,m) Y(N,m) Remarks Tr119 To be determined GVWFP3 Tr25 Northern Transformer GVWFP1&2 Tr26 Northern Transformer GVWFP1&2 Tr504 Siemens TP Melancthon WF Tr505 Siemens TP Melancthon WF Points of Reception (Receptors) Table - Point of Reception Locations Project Name: Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Datum and Projection: NAD83 (Canada); UTM 17N Point of Reception Height NPC ID Description (m) Class X(E,m) Y(N,m) R2 Receptor R3 Receptor R4 Receptor R5 Receptor R6 Receptor

133 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision R8 Receptor R10 Receptor R11 Receptor R12 Receptor R13 Receptor R14 Receptor R15 Receptor R16 Receptor R17 Receptor R18 Receptor R19 Receptor R22 Receptor R26 Receptor R34 Receptor R44 Receptor R45 Receptor R48 Receptor R50 Receptor R51 Receptor R52 Receptor R55 Receptor R58 Receptor R72 Receptor R76 Receptor R77 Receptor R78 Receptor R80 Receptor R86 Receptor R89 Receptor R93 Receptor R95 Receptor R97 Receptor R99 Receptor R100 Receptor R101 Receptor R103 Receptor R109 Receptor R112 Receptor R113 Receptor R117 Receptor R118 Receptor R119 Receptor R120 Receptor R122 Receptor R124 Receptor R128 Receptor R134 Receptor R136 Receptor R139 Receptor R140 Receptor R143 Receptor R145 Receptor R146 Receptor R148 Receptor R149 Receptor R152 Receptor R156 Receptor R157 Receptor R158 Receptor R159 Receptor

134 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision R161 Receptor R164 Receptor R165 Receptor R169 Receptor R171 Receptor R173 Receptor R174 Receptor R177 Receptor R179 Receptor R182 Receptor R184 Receptor R190 Receptor R194 Receptor R198 Receptor R199 Receptor R202 Receptor R206 Church R210 Receptor R215 Receptor R216 Receptor R217 Receptor R219 Receptor R222 Receptor R226 Receptor R230 Receptor R231 Receptor R232 Receptor R233 Receptor R235 Receptor R236 Receptor R238 Receptor R239 Receptor R241 Receptor R243 Receptor R244 Receptor R245 Receptor R248 Receptor R249 Receptor R253 Receptor R254 Receptor R258 Receptor R263 Receptor R270 Receptor R304 Receptor R305 Receptor R306 Receptor R307 Receptor R308 Receptor R310 Receptor R311 Receptor R312 Receptor R313 Receptor R673 Receptor R1555 Receptor

135 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision Vacant Lot Surrogate Receptors Table - Vacant Lot Surrogate Receptor Locations Project Name: Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Datum and Projection: NAD83 (Canada); UTM 17 Point of Reception Height NPC ID Description (m) Class X(E,m) Y(N,m) V360 VLSR V361 VLSR V366 VLSR V367 VLSR V374 VLSR V408 VLSR V409 VLSR V410 VLSR V411 VLSR V412 VLSR V414 VLSR V415 VLSR V416 VLSR V429 VLSR V446 VLSR V481 VLSR V482 VLSR V483 VLSR V484 VLSR V528 VLSR V608 VLSR V613 VLSR V614 VLSR V617 VLSR V618 VLSR V620 VLSR V621 VLSR V627 VLSR V668 VLSR V671 VLSR V672 VLSR V674 VLSR V677 VLSR V687 VLSR V692 VLSR V693 VLSR V725 VLSR V726 VLSR V727 VLSR V731 VLSR V732 VLSR V733 VLSR V734 VLSR V735 VLSR V1136 VLSR V1137 VLSR V1138 VLSR V1433 VLSR V1436 VLSR

136 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision V1487 VLSR V1493 VLSR V1496 VLSR V1512 VLSR V1519 VLSR V1521 VLSR V1526 VLSR V1527 VLSR V1528 VLSR V1531 VLSR V1544 VLSR V1546 VLSR V1553 VLSR V1556 VLSR V1557 VLSR Participating Receptors (Participants) Table - Participating Receptor Locations Project Name: Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Datum and Projection: NAD83 (Canada); UTM 17N Point of Reception Height NPC ID Description (m) Class X(E,m) Y(N,m) P75 Receptor P98 Receptor P111 Receptor P123 Receptor P125 Receptor P193 Receptor P204 Receptor P271 Receptor

137 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision APPENDIX B ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION The following documents have been included in this Appendix. Siemens Wind Power A/S: SWT , Rev.0, Max. Power 2772 kw Acoustic Emission, Hub Height 99.5 m Ontario - Canada This document provides broadband and octave band data for this model of the GVWFP3 project turbines. Siemens Wind Power A/S: SWT , Rev. 0, Max. Power 2648 kw Acoustic Emission, Hub Height 99.5 m Ontario - Canada This document provides broadband and octave band data for this model of the GVWFP3 project turbines. Siemens Wind Power A/S: SWT , Max. Power 2221 kw Contract Acoustic Emission, Hub Height 99.5 m. This document provides broadband and octave band data for this model of the GVWFP1&2 project turbines. Siemens Wind Power A/S: SWT , Max. Power 2126 kw Contract Acoustic Emission, Hub Height 99.5 m. This document provides broadband and octave band data for this model of the GVWFP1&2 project turbines. Siemens Energy Inc.: Letter from Anders J. Jensen This letter provides a statement re. tonality for SWT turbines. 56

138 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision GE Energy: Technical Documentation Wind turbine Generator System GE 1.5sl/sle 50 & 60 Hz Noise emission characteristics Normal operation according to IEC This document provides broadband, octave band, and tonality data for the Melancthon Wind Facility turbines. Note that for economy of space, three uninformative pages of this document have been omitted. 57

139 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision

140 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision

141 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision

142 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision

143 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision

144 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision

145 GRAND VALLEY WIND FARMS PHASE 3 WIND PROJECT Noise Assessment Report Revision

Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Wind Turbine Specification Report

Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Wind Turbine Specification Report Grand Valley Wind Farms Phase 3 Wind Project Wind Turbine Specification Report Prepared for: Grand Valley 2 Limited Partnership 222 3rd Avenue Southwest, Suite 900 Livingston Place, South Tower Calgary

More information

Noise Impact Assessment

Noise Impact Assessment APPENDIX C Noise Impact Assessment CBCL Limited Appendices NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT PUGWASH WIND FARM, NOVA SCOTIA Client Pugwash Wind Farm Inc. Contact Charles Demond Document No Issue B Status Classification

More information

Theme Comment Response. All neighbours should be entitled to revenue sharing, not just those who have signed an option agreement with Suncor.

Theme Comment Response. All neighbours should be entitled to revenue sharing, not just those who have signed an option agreement with Suncor. The following table summarizes the comments provided during and after the October 3 rd, 2012 Public Meeting for the Suncor Energy Adelaide Wind Project (the Project) via the questionnaire and email. The

More information

MURRA WARRA WIND FARM PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

MURRA WARRA WIND FARM PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT Sonus Pty Ltd 17 Ruthven Avenue ADELAIDE SA 5000 Phone: +61 8 8231 2100 www.sonus.com.au ABN: 67 882 843 130 Contact: Jason Turner Mobile: 0410 920 122 jturner@sonus.com.au MURRA WARRA WIND FARM PRELIMINARY

More information

SP Belle River. Draft Wind Turbine Specifications Report Belle River Wind Project

SP Belle River. Draft Wind Turbine Specifications Report Belle River Wind Project SP Belle River Draft Wind Turbine Specifications Report Belle River Wind Project SP Belle River Draft Wind Turbine Specifications Report Belle River Wind Project Prepared by: AECOM 105 Commerce Valley

More information

GE Renewable Energy. GE s 2 MW Platform PROVEN, RELIABLE WIND ENERGY SOLUTIONS YESTERDAY, TODAY, AND TOMORROW.

GE Renewable Energy. GE s 2 MW Platform PROVEN, RELIABLE WIND ENERGY SOLUTIONS YESTERDAY, TODAY, AND TOMORROW. GE Renewable Energy GE s 2 MW Platform PROVEN, RELIABLE WIND ENERGY SOLUTIONS YESTERDAY, TODAY, AND TOMORROW. www.gerenewableenergy.com GE S 2 MW PLATFORM PITCH Since entering the wind industry in 2002,

More information

GE Renewable Energy BEST-IN-CLASS CAPACITY FACTOR. GE s

GE Renewable Energy BEST-IN-CLASS CAPACITY FACTOR. GE s GE Renewable Energy BEST-IN-CLASS CAPACITY FACTOR GE s 1.7-100 www.ge.com/wind GE S 1.7-100 PITCH Since entering the wind industry in 2002, GE Renewable Energy has invested more than $2 billion in next-generation

More information

GE Renewable Energy CAPACITY FACTOR LEADERSHIP IN HIGH WIND REGIMES. GE s

GE Renewable Energy CAPACITY FACTOR LEADERSHIP IN HIGH WIND REGIMES. GE s GE Renewable Energy CAPACITY FACTOR LEADERSHIP IN HIGH WIND REGIMES GE s 1.85-82.5 www.ge.com/wind GE S 1.85-82.5 PITCH Since entering the wind industry in 2002, GE Renewable Energy has invested more than

More information

Published by and copyright 2009: Siemens AG Energy Sector Freyeslebenstrasse Erlangen, Germany

Published by and copyright 2009: Siemens AG Energy Sector Freyeslebenstrasse Erlangen, Germany Published by and copyright 2009: Siemens AG Energy Sector Freyeslebenstrasse 1 91058 Erlangen, Germany Siemens Wind Power A/S Borupvej 16 7330 Brande, Denmark www.siemens.com/wind For more information,

More information

NOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING FOR BLUEWATER RIVER CROSSING REPLACEMENT PROJECT

NOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING FOR BLUEWATER RIVER CROSSING REPLACEMENT PROJECT Stantec Consulting Ltd. 300-675 Cochrane Drive West Tower Markham ON L3R 0B8 Tel: (905) 944-7777 Fax: (905) 474-9889 August 9, 2012 File: 160960699 NOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING

More information

Ontario Corp. as general partner for and on behalf of Illumination LP 545 Speedvale Ave W Guelph, Ontario N1K 1E6

Ontario Corp. as general partner for and on behalf of Illumination LP 545 Speedvale Ave W Guelph, Ontario N1K 1E6 Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change Ministère de l Environnement et de l Action en matière de changement climatique AMENDMENT TO RENEWABLE ENERGY APPROVAL NUMBER 7639-96SGEZ Issue Date: November

More information

NaturEner Wild Rose 1 Energy Inc.

NaturEner Wild Rose 1 Energy Inc. Decision 2013-348 Amendment to Wild Rose 1 Wind Power Plant September 13, 2013 The Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 2013-348: Amendment to Wild Rose 1 Wind Power Plant Application No. 1609685 Proceeding

More information

WILSON TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: WIND ENERGY

WILSON TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: WIND ENERGY WILSON TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: WIND ENERGY (ADD TO ARTICLE 2) WIND ENERGY DEFINITIONS: Ambient: Ambient is defined as the sound pressure level exceeded ninety (90) percent of the time. Anemometer:

More information

Proposed Revisions to. Wind Energy Development Guidelines Targeted Review in relation to Noise, Proximity and Shadow Flicker December 11 th 2013

Proposed Revisions to. Wind Energy Development Guidelines Targeted Review in relation to Noise, Proximity and Shadow Flicker December 11 th 2013 Proposed Revisions to Wind Energy Development Guidelines 2006 Targeted Review in relation to Noise, Proximity and Shadow Flicker December 11 th 2013 1 Contents Page Introduction 3 Revision to Noise sections

More information

Wind Energy Ordinances

Wind Energy Ordinances INFORMATION GUIDE: Wind Energy Ordinances Wind turbines are multiplying across the U.S., and most are installed in rural areas overlooking crops, cattle, timber, and lakes. Rural communities have experienced

More information

Oldman 2 Wind Farm Limited

Oldman 2 Wind Farm Limited Decision 2010-461 Oldman 2 Wind Farm Project September 24, 2010 ALBERTA UTILITIES COMMISSION Decision 2010-461: Oldman 2 Wind Farm Project Application No. 1605398 Proceeding ID. 293 September 24, 2010

More information

Wind Turbine Generator System Acoustic Noise Test Report. Bergey Excel Wind Turbine

Wind Turbine Generator System Acoustic Noise Test Report. Bergey Excel Wind Turbine June 2003 NREL/EL-500-33833 Wind Turbine Generator System Acoustic Noise Test Report for the Bergey Excel Wind Turbine By National Wind Technology Center National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole

More information

ARTICLE 16 - WIND ENERGY CONVERSION FACILITIES

ARTICLE 16 - WIND ENERGY CONVERSION FACILITIES ARTICLE 16 - WIND ENERGY CONVERSION FACILITIES SECTION 1601 Wind Energy Installation In any zoning district, a conditional use permit or building permit may be granted to allow a wind energy conversion

More information

Statutory Order on noise from wind turbines

Statutory Order on noise from wind turbines The full text Statutory Order on noise from wind turbines Pursuant to section 7(1), no. 1 and 2, section 7a(1), section 92 and section 110(3) and (4) of the Danish Environmental Protection Act, cf. Consolidation

More information

Cassadaga Wind Project Exhibit 6. Wind Power Facilities

Cassadaga Wind Project Exhibit 6. Wind Power Facilities Case No. 14-F-0490 1001.6 Exhibit 6 Wind Power Facilities WIND POWER FACILITIES (a) Factors Considered During Placement of Wind Turbines (Setback Requirements/Recommendations/Fall-Down Distances) The primary

More information

C&B Alberta Solar Development ULC

C&B Alberta Solar Development ULC Decision 22781-D01-2017 Newell Solar Power Plant November 15, 2017 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 22781-D01-2017 Newell Solar Power Plant Proceeding 22781 Application 22781-A001 November 15, 2017

More information

ALPHA-OMEGA 1 MW WIND GENERATOR ALPHA OMEGA ECOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS. Direct Phones: &

ALPHA-OMEGA 1 MW WIND GENERATOR ALPHA OMEGA ECOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS. Direct Phones: & ALPHA-OMEGA 1 MW WIND GENERATOR ALPHA OMEGA ECOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS Athens Office: 8, R. Garibaldi & Sofroniskou str. Tel. +30.210.9228225 Email: info@alpha-omega.com.gr Direct Phones: +30.697.42 28 012 &

More information

Canadian Solar Developers Ltd.

Canadian Solar Developers Ltd. Canadian Solar Developers Ltd. Type of Document Draft Report Project Name Proposed Ground Mount Solar Facility L.P #5 8338 Scotchmere Drive, Strathroy, ON OPA FIT Program: FIT-FL67GB5 Project Number V00002250-00

More information

WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS

WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS CHAPTER 159 WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS 159.01 Purpose and Intent 159.05 Location 159.02 Definitions 159.06 Design and Technical Standards 159.03 General Regulations 159.07 Abandonment and Removal Procedure

More information

Applications for Power Plants, Substations, Transmission Lines, Industrial System Designations and Hydro Developments

Applications for Power Plants, Substations, Transmission Lines, Industrial System Designations and Hydro Developments Rule 007 Applications for Power Plants, Substations, Transmission Lines, Industrial System Designations and Hydro Developments This rule as amended was approved by the Alberta Utilities Commission on June

More information

Noise Compliance Requirements for Distribution Transformers

Noise Compliance Requirements for Distribution Transformers Noise Compliance Requirements for Distribution Transformers 1. Brief description Guideline outlining acceptable placement of new distribution transformers to ensure compliance with the Environmental Protection

More information

5. RECORDS REVIEW RESULTS

5. RECORDS REVIEW RESULTS Dufferin Wind Power Inc. 5. RECORDS REVIEW RESULTS As stated in Section 3, the wind turbines are located entirely within the Township of Melancthon, approximately 14 kilometres from the Town of Shelburne

More information

GE Power & Water Renewable Energy. GE s A brilliant wind turbine for India. ge-energy.com/wind

GE Power & Water Renewable Energy. GE s A brilliant wind turbine for India. ge-energy.com/wind GE Power & Water Renewable Energy GE s 1.7-103 A brilliant wind turbine for India ge-energy.com/wind GE s 1.7-103 Wind Turbine Since entering the wind industry in 2002, GE Power & Water s Renewable Energy

More information

Welcome to our Open House!

Welcome to our Open House! Welcome to our Open House! Please sign in at the front desk and provide your contact information if you would like to receive project updates. We invite you to walk around and look at the displays. If

More information

MCS 020. MCS Planning Standards. For permitted development installations of wind turbines and air source heat pumps on domestic premises

MCS 020. MCS Planning Standards. For permitted development installations of wind turbines and air source heat pumps on domestic premises MCS 020 MCS Planning Standards For permitted development installations of wind turbines and air source heat pumps on domestic premises This Standard is the property of Department of Energy and Climate

More information

Wind Turbine Noise, Infrasound and Noise Perception

Wind Turbine Noise, Infrasound and Noise Perception Wind Turbine Noise, Infrasound and Noise Perception Anthony L. Rogers, Ph.D. Renewable Energy Research Laboratory at Amherst January 18, 2006 www.ceere.org/rerl Overview Terminology Wind Turbine Noise

More information

WINDPARK BOGDANCI PILOT PROJECT

WINDPARK BOGDANCI PILOT PROJECT WINDPARK BOGDANCI PILOT PROJECT Prepared by: Development and Investments Department Skopje, 2015 Project Background The decision for including the wind energy as part of ELEM s portfolio has been determined

More information

Merivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study

Merivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study Merivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study Prepared By: NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 Submitted:

More information

APPENDIX R SHADOW FLICKER REPORT

APPENDIX R SHADOW FLICKER REPORT APPENDIX R SHADOW FLICKER REPORT Shadow Flicker Study Palo Alto Wind Energy Project - Palo Alto County, Iowa Prepared for: Palo Alto Wind Energy LLC One South Wacker Drive Suite 1800 Chicago, Illinois

More information

Applications for Power Plants, Substations, Transmission Lines, Industrial System Designations and Hydro Developments

Applications for Power Plants, Substations, Transmission Lines, Industrial System Designations and Hydro Developments Rule 007 Applications for Power Plants, Substations, Transmission Lines, Industrial System Designations and Hydro Developments This rule as amended was approved by the Alberta Utilities Commission on December

More information

EOLINCYL. Where Others Try We Succeed

EOLINCYL. Where Others Try We Succeed EOLINCYL Where Others Try We Succeed Who We Are Eolincyl is a company formed by a team with solid professional experience in the wind energy field aiming to meet the needs of industry and society, which

More information

U.S electricity flow, 2005

U.S electricity flow, 2005 Wind Energy Systems Prof. Surya Santoso Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin ssantoso@ece.utexas.edu U.S electricity flow, 2005 Unit is in quadrillion BTU

More information

ELG4126 Distributed Generation and Renewables

ELG4126 Distributed Generation and Renewables ELG4126 Distributed Generation and Renewables Case Study of Renewable Energy and Smart Grid of Three Phases Phase One: Wind Farm Conduct a feasibility study for initiating a profitable wind energy farm

More information

Content Copy Of Original

Content Copy Of Original Content Copy Of Original Ministry of the Environment Ministère de l Environnement AMENDMENT TO RENEWABLE ENERGY APPROVAL NUMBER 0017-8YGJJM Issue Date: July 31, 2014 SunE Taylor Kidd GP Corp. as general

More information

NIAGARA REGION WIND FARM PROJECT

NIAGARA REGION WIND FARM PROJECT NIAGARA REGION WIND FARM PROJECT Community Liaison Committee Meeting 4 February 7, 2017 AGENDA Introductions & Meeting Structure Outline Review of Minutes CLC Meeting #3 Project Update Topics of Community

More information

ORDINANCE NO. VI-III A WIND ENERGY DEVICE ORDINANCE EMMET COUNTY, IOWA AN ORDINANCE ADDRESSING STANDARDS, CONDITIONS, APPLICATION, REVIEW AND

ORDINANCE NO. VI-III A WIND ENERGY DEVICE ORDINANCE EMMET COUNTY, IOWA AN ORDINANCE ADDRESSING STANDARDS, CONDITIONS, APPLICATION, REVIEW AND ORDINANCE NO. VI-III A WIND ENERGY DEVICE ORDINANCE EMMET COUNTY, IOWA AN ORDINANCE ADDRESSING STANDARDS, CONDITIONS, APPLICATION, REVIEW AND APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF WIND ENERGY

More information

Windfarm De Locht. The Netherlands

Windfarm De Locht. The Netherlands Windfarm De Locht The Netherlands July 2016 Index Index...2 1. Introduction...3 2. General specifications...3 3. Scope of the windfarm...4 4. Availability...4 5. Production data...4 6. Site Access...4

More information

Seven Generations Energy Ltd.

Seven Generations Energy Ltd. Decision 22976-D01-2018 Power Plant Exemption at Gold Creek Gas Plant January 17, 2018 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 22976-D01-2018 Power Plant Exemption at Gold Creek Gas Plant Proceeding 22976

More information

Appendix K Shadow Flicker Study

Appendix K Shadow Flicker Study Appendix K Shadow Flicker Study Shadow Flicker Assessment- Honeywood Final Report Submitted to: Geilectric 1850, Panama Street, Suite 501 Brossard (Québec) Canada J4W 3C6 Classification: Reference: Honeywood_ShadowFlickering

More information

Canadian Wind Energy Association Position on Setbacks for Large-Scale Wind Turbines in Rural Areas (MOE Class 3) in Ontario

Canadian Wind Energy Association Position on Setbacks for Large-Scale Wind Turbines in Rural Areas (MOE Class 3) in Ontario Canadian Wind Energy Association Position on Setbacks for Large-Scale Wind Turbines in Rural Areas (MOE Class 3) in Ontario September 28, 2007 i Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary...1 2. Introduction...2

More information

RETScreen. International CLEAN ENERGY PROJECT ANALYSIS: WIND ENERGY PROJECT ANALYSIS CHAPTER RETSCREEN ENGINEERING & CASES TEXTBOOK

RETScreen. International CLEAN ENERGY PROJECT ANALYSIS: WIND ENERGY PROJECT ANALYSIS CHAPTER RETSCREEN ENGINEERING & CASES TEXTBOOK RETScreen International Clean Energy Decision Support Centre www.retscreen.net CLEAN ENERGY PROJECT ANALYSIS: RETSCREEN ENGINEERING & CASES TEXTBOOK WIND ENERGY PROJECT ANALYSIS CHAPTER Disclaimer This

More information

Wind Power Regulatory Process Review

Wind Power Regulatory Process Review Wind Power Regulatory Process Review Stakeholder Consultation Summary of Discussion September 28, 2012 The Alberta Utilities Commission Wind Power Regulatory Process Review Stakeholder Consultation Summary

More information

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL. Number Three Wind Farm Lewis County, New York. Case 16-F-0328

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL. Number Three Wind Farm Lewis County, New York. Case 16-F-0328 NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL Number Three Wind Farm Lewis County, New York Case 16-F-0328 October 2016 CONTENTS 1 Background... 3 2 Noise-Sensitive Receptors... 4 3 Ambient Noise Assessment... 5 3.1

More information

Final Construction Plan Report Belle River Wind Project

Final Construction Plan Report Belle River Wind Project Prepared by: AECOM 105 Commerce Valley Drive West, Floor 7 905 886 7022 tel Markham, ON, Canada L3T 7W3 905 886 9494 fax www.aecom.com Project Number: 60321891 Date: May, 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...

More information

Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines

Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines Document under Separate Cover refer to IMLC01-13 Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines April 2013 Legislative & Planning Services Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction...1 1.1 Key Definitions...1 2.0 Existing

More information

Rumster Wind Energy Project

Rumster Wind Energy Project Rumster Wind Energy Project Report OSE3525 Appendix D Noise and Shadow Flicker Assessment Orkney Sustainable Energy Limited 6 North End Road Stromness Orkney KW16 3AG Telephone 01856850054 Facsimile 01856851199

More information

GE Power & Water. Improved Aeroacoustics and Noise Management Options. Saskia Honhoff, Dr. Benoît Petitjean, Dr. Roger Drobietz, Dr. Kevin W.

GE Power & Water. Improved Aeroacoustics and Noise Management Options. Saskia Honhoff, Dr. Benoît Petitjean, Dr. Roger Drobietz, Dr. Kevin W. GE Power & Water Saskia Honhoff, Dr. Benoît Petitjean, Dr. Roger Drobietz, Dr. Kevin W. Kinzie From turbine to receptor Source Blade noise Machinery noise Turbine operation Flexible turbine & farm operation

More information

Synergy Wind Pty Ltd PO Box 327 Balaclava VIC 3183

Synergy Wind Pty Ltd PO Box 327 Balaclava VIC 3183 ALBERTON WIND FARM NOISE ASSESSMENT Rp 001 R02 2015590ML 6 September 2017 6 Gipps Street Collingwood 3066 Victoria Australia T: +613 9416 1855 A.C.N. 006 675 403 www.marshallday.com Project: ALBERTON WIND

More information

Comparison of compliance results obtained from the various wind farm standards used in Australia

Comparison of compliance results obtained from the various wind farm standards used in Australia Paper Number 50, Proceedings of ACOUSTICS 2011 Comparison of compliance results obtained from the various wind farm standards used in Australia Jonathan Cooper (1), Tom Evans (1) and Luis Najera (2) (1)

More information

V MW. One turbine for one world. vestas.com

V MW. One turbine for one world. vestas.com V112-3.0 MW One turbine for one world vestas.com No. 1 in Modern Energy The world needs ever-greater supplies of clean, sustainable energy. Modern energy that promotes sustainable development and greater

More information

BC Hydro Wind Data Study Update

BC Hydro Wind Data Study Update PUBLIC DOCUMENT September 24, 2009 Prepared for: British Columbia Hydro & Power Authority 333 Dunsmuir Street Vancouver, BC V6B 5R3 DNV Global Energy Concepts Inc. 1809 7th Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington

More information

GRAND RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK PROJECT DESCRIPTION REPORT

GRAND RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK PROJECT DESCRIPTION REPORT File No. 160960577 Prepared for: Samsung Renewable Energy Inc. 55 Standish Court Mississauga, ON L5R 4B2 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Suite 1-70 Southgate Drive Guelph ON N1G 4P5 Executive Summary

More information

CONTENTS 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION NEED FOR THE PROJECT ABOUT THE PROPONENT SITE SELECTION OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT 2 5

CONTENTS 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION NEED FOR THE PROJECT ABOUT THE PROPONENT SITE SELECTION OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT 2 5 CONTENTS 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-2 2.1 NEED FOR THE PROJECT 2 2 2.2 ABOUT THE PROPONENT 2 4 2.3 SITE SELECTION 2 4 2.4 OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT 2 5 Figure 2.1: Provisional wind profile for the Jeffrey

More information

Evaluating Ontario Regulations for Siting Turbines. in Context of. Findings from the Health Canada Study

Evaluating Ontario Regulations for Siting Turbines. in Context of. Findings from the Health Canada Study Evaluating Ontario Regulations for Siting Turbines in Context of Findings from the Health Canada Study December 3, 2014 Executive Summary The Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change regulates

More information

Wind farm aural and visual impact in the Netherlands

Wind farm aural and visual impact in the Netherlands Wind farm aural and visual impact in the Netherlands F. Van Den Berg a, E. Pedersen b, R. Bakker c and J. Bouma c a University of Groningen - Science & Society Group, Nijenborgh 4, 9747AG Groningen, Netherlands

More information

9.2 Definitions. The following terms are defined, for purposes of Section 9, as follows:

9.2 Definitions. The following terms are defined, for purposes of Section 9, as follows: SECTION 9. COMMERCIAL WIND ENERGY FACILITIES 9.1 Purpose. The purpose of this Section 9 of the Zoning Bylaw is to provide by special permit for the construction and operation of commercial wind facilities

More information

Request for Quotations Acoustic Consultant Services

Request for Quotations Acoustic Consultant Services Request for Quotations Acoustic Consultant Services DESCRIPTION The Cape Cod Commission is seeking an experienced, qualified acoustic consultant to assist the Commission in developing a methodology for

More information

APPENDIX 5.12-A PROJECT NOISE ANALYSIS: ARTESIAN SUBSTATION

APPENDIX 5.12-A PROJECT NOISE ANALYSIS: ARTESIAN SUBSTATION APPENDIX 5.12-A PROJECT NOISE ANALYSIS: ARTESIAN SUBSTATION FINAL PROJECT NOISE ANALYSIS Artesian Substation B&V PROJECT NO. 188602 Black & Veatch Holding Company 2015. All rights reserved. PREPARED FOR

More information

AE 495 Wind Energy and Wind Turbine Technology Fall 2012 Mondays 13:40-16:30 AE-126

AE 495 Wind Energy and Wind Turbine Technology Fall 2012 Mondays 13:40-16:30 AE-126 AE 495 Wind Energy and Wind Turbine Technology Fall 2012 Mondays 13:40-16:30 AE-126 Oğuz Uzol Director METU Center for Wind Energy Associate Professor Department of Aerospace Engineering Middle East Technical

More information

An old renewed means to produce energy

An old renewed means to produce energy WIND POWER ENERGY OBJECTIF: This lessons aims at discovering wind electricity production. Our tasks will consists in - explaining how a wind turbine works - observing how wind farms are installed - finding

More information

Capital II Wind Farm - Noise Impact Assessment

Capital II Wind Farm - Noise Impact Assessment Capital II Wind Farm - Noise Impact Assessment Capital II Wind Farm Document No.: 50B-10-0075-TRP-773565-2 9 Dec 2010 Vipac Engineers & Scientists Ltd 17-19 King William Street Kent Town SA 5067 Phone:

More information

Noise Feasibility Study Commercial Building, 65 Denzil Doyle Court Ottawa, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Commercial Building, 65 Denzil Doyle Court Ottawa, Ontario Noise Feasibility Study Commercial Building, 65 Denzil Doyle Court Ottawa, Ontario Prepared for: 8214221 Canada Inc. c/o LRL Associates Ltd. 1-2884 Chamerland Street Rockland, Ontario K4K 1M6 Prepared

More information

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD BETWEEN POPLAR AVENUE AND MAPLE AVENUE TOWN OF AJAX PREPARED FOR: TMIG February 2017 Y1610 TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

Environmental Noise Compliance Assessment Bass Point Quarry

Environmental Noise Compliance Assessment Bass Point Quarry P: 4421 4583 M: 0414 315 775 50 Junction Street, Nowra, NSW 2541 matthew@harwoodacsoutics.com.au www.harwoodacoustics.com.au ABN: 71634 997 937 Environmental Noise Compliance Assessment Bass Point Quarry

More information

Welcome. to the Community Meeting for the Niagara Region Wind Project. Thank you for coming!

Welcome. to the Community Meeting for the Niagara Region Wind Project. Thank you for coming! Welcome to the Community Meeting for the Niagara Region Wind Project Thank you for coming! In early September we will host the first Public Open House under We are happy to share information about this

More information

The Clem7 Motorway Tunnel: Mechanical and Electrical Plant Acoustic Design and Performance

The Clem7 Motorway Tunnel: Mechanical and Electrical Plant Acoustic Design and Performance Paper Number 67, Proceedings of ACOUSTICS 2011 2-4 November 2011, Gold Coast, Australia The Clem7 Motorway Tunnel: Mechanical and Electrical Plant Acoustic Design and Performance Claire Richardson and

More information

Title Reference Date Revision AWEA Small Wind Turbine Performance and AWEA 9.1 December 2009 First edition

Title Reference Date Revision AWEA Small Wind Turbine Performance and AWEA 9.1 December 2009 First edition Bl. No. 86, 1198 Qinzhou Road (North), Shanghai, China 200233 Telephone: 86 21 6127 8200 Facsimile: 86 21 5426 2346 www.intertek.com Date Report Number 130500333SHA-001 Intertek Project No: 130500333SHA

More information

BARON WINDS SOUND MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE PROTOCOL

BARON WINDS SOUND MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE PROTOCOL BARON WINDS SOUND MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE PROTOCOL 11.17.2017 PREPARED FOR: BARON WINDS, LLC 55 Railroad Row White River Junction, VT 05001 802.295.4999 www.rsginc.com SUBMITTED BY: RSG BARON WINDS

More information

V MW Opening up a new world of opportunities

V MW Opening up a new world of opportunities V100-1.8 MW Opening up a new world of opportunities Extracts power from extremely low winds thanks to its 49 m blades This V100-1.8 MW turbine allows you to increase productivity by opening up low-wind

More information

Developing a Wind Farm. Bill Whitlock, June 26, 2008 Bloomington, IL

Developing a Wind Farm. Bill Whitlock, June 26, 2008 Bloomington, IL Developing a Wind Farm Bill Whitlock, June 26, 2008 Bloomington, IL Overview Horizon Wind Energy Overview Project Devlopment Process Developing a Wind Farm, Horizon Wind Energy s Twin Groves Wind Farm

More information

Framework for the Categorisation of Losses and Uncertainty for Wind Energy Assessments

Framework for the Categorisation of Losses and Uncertainty for Wind Energy Assessments Framework for the Categorisation of Losses and Uncertainty for Wind Energy Assessments In collaboration with: Introduction A typical wind resource and energy yield assessment derives gross generation from

More information

File No March Prepared for: Prepared by:

File No March Prepared for: Prepared by: PORT RYERSE WIND POWER PROJECT File No. 160960773 Prepared for: Boralex Inc. 772 Sherbrooke St. West Suite 200 Montreal QC H3A 1G1 In Association with: UDI Renewables Corporation 492 South Coast Drive

More information

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD INTERNATIONAL STANDARD IEC 61400-1 Third edition 2005-08 Wind turbines Part 1: Design requirements IEC 2005 Copyright - all rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in

More information

Nance County Zoning Regulations for Wind Energy Conversion Systems

Nance County Zoning Regulations for Wind Energy Conversion Systems Nance County Zoning Regulations for Wind Energy Conversion Systems ARTICLE 1: SMALL / NON-COMMERCIAL WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS Section 1. Purpose It is the purpose of this regulation to promote safe, effective

More information

Decision GTE Solar Inc. Brooks Solar Power Plant. January 31, 2013

Decision GTE Solar Inc. Brooks Solar Power Plant. January 31, 2013 Decision 2013-027 Brooks Solar Power Plant January 31, 2013 The Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 2013-027: Brooks Solar Power Plant Application No. 1608532 Proceeding ID No. 1938 January 31, 2013

More information

Variations of sound from wind turbines during different weather conditions

Variations of sound from wind turbines during different weather conditions Variations of sound from wind turbines during different weather conditions Conny Larsson 1 Olof Öhlund 2 Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden Long-term

More information

Modern Wind Turbine Technologies and its application in KSA. Prof. Dr. Ali M. Eltamaly SET Center, King Saud University

Modern Wind Turbine Technologies and its application in KSA. Prof. Dr. Ali M. Eltamaly SET Center, King Saud University Modern Wind Turbine Technologies and its application in KSA Prof. Dr. Ali M. Eltamaly SET Center, King Saud University Wind Energy Systems Overview 1.1 Historical Development Wind power in sailboats was

More information

NOVA Chemicals Corporation

NOVA Chemicals Corporation Decision 2013-426 NOVA Chemicals Corporation Industrial System Designation Amendment November 29, 2013 The Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 2013-426: NOVA Chemicals Corporation Industrial System Designation

More information

Wind Turbine Zoning for CERTs

Wind Turbine Zoning for CERTs Turbine Northwest Energy Workshop August 3rd, 2006 University of Minnesota Crookston Mark Lindquist The Minnesota Project www.mnproject.org The Model Ordinance Project Collaboration of: The Minnesota Project

More information

SEWRPC Model Zoning Ordinance ZONING REGULATIONS FOR WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS

SEWRPC Model Zoning Ordinance ZONING REGULATIONS FOR WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS Model ordinance for wind energy systems (00228999).DOC NMA 12/20/16; 11/30/15 SEWRPC Model Zoning Ordinance ZONING REGULATIONS FOR WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS These regulations have not been reviewed by an attorney.

More information

APPENDIX B TURBINE DRAWINGS

APPENDIX B TURBINE DRAWINGS APPENDIX B TURBINE DRAWINGS Are you looking for the maximum return on your investment in wind energy? Wind energy means the world to us. And we want it to mean the world to our customers, too, by maximising

More information

KENT BREEZE WIND FARMS

KENT BREEZE WIND FARMS Design and Operations Report MAY 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. SITE PLANS... 1 3. FACILITY DESIGN... 2 4. FACILITY OPERATIONS... 2 5. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS MONITORING PLAN... 3 6. EMERGENCY

More information

Big Thunder Wind Park

Big Thunder Wind Park Big Thunder Wind Park Frequently Asked Questions Prepared for: Horizon Wind Inc. Prepared by: M.K. Ince and Associates April 14, 2011 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Project Details and Description 1. Where

More information

Cornwall Solar Project Renewable Energy Approval Modification Report

Cornwall Solar Project Renewable Energy Approval Modification Report Cornwall Solar Project Renewable Energy Approval Modification Report Algonquin Power Co 2845 Bristol Circle Oakville ON, L6H 7H7 Contents Contents... 1 Introduction... 2 Summary and Rational for Minor

More information

TURBINE FAILURE LITERATURE REVIEW AND THE WIND TURBINE CERTIFICATION PROCESS

TURBINE FAILURE LITERATURE REVIEW AND THE WIND TURBINE CERTIFICATION PROCESS TURBINE FAILURE LITERATURE REVIEW AND THE WIND TURBINE CERTIFICATION PROCESS Client Contact Green Mountain Power Corp. Charles Pughe Document No 41404/AR/03A Classification Client s Discretion Status Final

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Jericho Rise Wind Farm

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Jericho Rise Wind Farm EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This (SEIS) has been prepared for the proposed Jericho Rise Wind Farm (the Project). LLC (the Applicant), a wholly owned subsidiary of EDP Renewables (EDPR), is proposing to construct

More information

Possible Impacts of Low Frequency Wind. Rita B. Messing, Ph.D. Carl Herbrandson, Ph.D. Risk Assessment Course, Feb. 2011

Possible Impacts of Low Frequency Wind. Rita B. Messing, Ph.D. Carl Herbrandson, Ph.D. Risk Assessment Course, Feb. 2011 Possible Impacts of Low Frequency Wind Turbine Noise on Public Health Rita B. Messing, Ph.D. Carl Herbrandson, Ph.D. Risk Assessment Course, Feb. 2011 Environmental Review of LWECS in Minnesota Large Wind

More information

Content Copy Of Original

Content Copy Of Original Content Copy Of Original Ministry of the Environment Ministère de l Environnement ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE APPROVAL NUMBER 4495-9FUQDY Issue Date: February 5, 2014 Holcim (Canada) Inc. 2300 Steeles Ave

More information

C&B Alberta Solar Development ULC

C&B Alberta Solar Development ULC Decision 22296-D01-2017 Hays Solar Power Plant June 7, 2017 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 22296-D01-2017 Hays Solar Power Plant Proceeding 22296 Application 22296-A001 June 7, 2017 Published by

More information

Turbine subsystems include: What is wind energy? What is a wind turbine and how does it work?

Turbine subsystems include: What is wind energy? What is a wind turbine and how does it work? What is wind energy? In reality, wind energy is a converted form of solar energy. The sun's radiation heats different parts of the earth at different rates-most notably during the day and night, but also

More information

Challenges to Wind Development Review of Representative Wind Projects & Wind Project Siting Concerns

Challenges to Wind Development Review of Representative Wind Projects & Wind Project Siting Concerns Challenges to Wind Development Review of Representative Wind Projects & Wind Project Siting Concerns Massachusetts Wind Working Group Meeting Wednesday, October 17 th, 2012 Held At Aeronautica Windpower

More information

RENEWABLE AND ALTERNATIVE ENERGIES

RENEWABLE AND ALTERNATIVE ENERGIES RENEWABLE AND ALTERNATIVE ENERGIES Degree in Energy Resources Engineering Academic year 2014-15 Prof. Pablo Castro Description: This is a case study for the development of a small wind farm: Wind farm

More information

Wind Development: Benefits and Constraints

Wind Development: Benefits and Constraints Wind Development: Benefits and Constraints Joseph Fischl And Charles Malaniak Tetra Tech EC, Inc. 1 Objective Benefits of wind energy Define small vs. big wind Identify setbacks and development constraints

More information

A REPORT ON THE EFFICIENCY OF A WHALEPOWER CORP. 5 METER PROTOTYPE WIND TURBINE BLADE

A REPORT ON THE EFFICIENCY OF A WHALEPOWER CORP. 5 METER PROTOTYPE WIND TURBINE BLADE B E L L E Q U A N T, L L C L A U R E N S E. H O W L E, P H. D. WHALEPOWER WENVOR BLADE A REPORT ON THE EFFICIENCY OF A WHALEPOWER CORP. 5 METER PROTOTYPE WIND TURBINE BLADE JANUARY 24, 2009 6 0 0 2 D I

More information

Prepared for: Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. 14 Carlton Street Toronto, Ontario M5B 1K5. Prepared by:

Prepared for: Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. 14 Carlton Street Toronto, Ontario M5B 1K5. Prepared by: EMISSION SUMMARY AND DISPERSION MODELLING REPORT IN SUPPORT OF A RENEWABLE ENERGY APPROVAL APPLICATION TORONTO HYDRO ENERGY SERVICES INC. LESLIE ST., TORONTO, ONTARIO Prepared for: Toronto Hydro Energy

More information