Industry Workshop Break-Out. Building Construction. Seoul South Korea. 21 October ASTM International

Transcription

1 Industry Workshop Break-Out Building Construction Seoul South Korea 21 October 2014 ASTM International

2 Sustainable Construction Case Study: Copper and the Phoenix Health Sciences Education Building Seoul, South Korea, 21 October 2014 Andy Kireta Jr. Vice President Copper Development Association Inc ASTM International

3 North American Green Building Landscape USGBC LEED Living Building Challenge International Green Construction Code Water Sense Green Globes NAHB National Green Building Standard Energy Star 3

4 Green Building Goals Established by prescription Rating schemes that award points based on building inputs, technologies Score sheet approach i.e. LEED for New Construction v2009 Points for inputs and design considerations in 7 areas Established by performance Heavily focused on life-cycle analysis of buildings as holistic systems i.e. LEED v4 (released in 2014) 4

5 Green Building v. Sustainable Construction Facts instead of Claims Green Building has devolved into a pursuit of points, marketing claims and rating schemes that have lost sight of the goal of sustainable construction buildings that: last longer, operate more efficiently, with less input, and less environmental impact during the building s construction and throughout its lifetime. 5

6 Why? Sustainable Buildings offer benefits Environmental benefits Less energy usage/renewable energy usage Lower CO2 emissions Less water usage/better water maintenance Lower impact Financial benefits Lower rents/higher occupancy Tax benefits Increased resale value Social benefits Health gains Productivity improvement Reputational benefits 6

7 Case Study: Phoenix Health Sciences Education Building 7

8 Case Study: Phoenix Health Sciences Education Building: Energy & Atmosphere Embed Kireta Clip 1 here; start on click om/kireta%20clip%201.mp4?dl=0 8

9 Case Study: Phoenix Health Sciences Education Building: Innovation in Design Embed Kireta Clip 2 here; start on click tnf/kireta%20clip%202.mp4?dl=0 9

10 Case Study: Phoenix Health Sciences Education Building: Materials & Resources Embed Kireta Clip 3 here: start on click hvs/kireta%20clip%203.mp4?dl=0 10

11 Materials Content Driven by Standards Ice & Water Shield ASTM D1970, D3767, D412, D903, E96, D46, E108 Copper Sheet ASTM B370 Aluminum Z-purlins ASTM B308 Mineral Wool Rigid Insulation Board ASTM C726 11

12 AP EP GWP ODP SP ADP (elem) ADP (fossil) AP EP GWP ODP POCP Rela ve Impact Environmental Performance Claims driven by Standards Page 8 of 11 Page 9 of 11 Copper sheet and strip for building construction According to ISO Copper sheet and strip for building construction According to ISO Life Cycle Assessment: Results Life Cycle Assessment: Interpretation ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS CML 2001 (Nov 2010) Manufacturing End-of-Life Credits Parameter Unit A1-A3 C4 D GWP kg CO2 eq 3.24E E E-01 ODP kg CFC-11 eq 3.85E E E-09 AP kg SO2 eq 3.93E E E-03 EP kg PO43- eq 1.13E E E-04 POCP kg C2H4 eq 3.85E E E+00 ADPE kg Sb eq 1.56E E E-05 ADPF MJ 3.85E E E+00 TRACI 2.1 Manufacturing End-of-Life Credits Parameter Unit A1-A3 C4 D GWP kg CO2 eq 3.24E E E-01 ODP kg CFC-11 eq 4.21E E E-09 AP kg SO2 eq 3.50E E E-03 EP kg N eq 5.79E E E-05 SP kg O3 eq 1.92E E E-02 RESOURCE USE Manufacturing End-of-Life Credits Parameter Unit A1-A3 C4 D PERE [MJ] 2.87E E E-01 PERM [MJ] 0.00E E E+00 PERT [MJ] 2.87E E E-01 PENRE [MJ] 3.85E E E+00 PENRM [MJ] 0.00E E E+00 PENRT [MJ] 3.85E E E+00 SM [kg] 0.00E E E+00 RSF [MJ] 0.00E E E+00 NRSF [MJ] 0.00E E E+00 FW [m³] 2.18E E E-01 OUTPUT FLOWS AND WASTE CATEGORIES Manufacturing End-of-Life Credits Parameter Unit A1-A3 C4 D HWD [kg] 4.20E E E-03 NHWD [kg] 9.32E E E+01 RWD [kg] 1.35E E E-05 CRU [kg] 0.00E E E+00 MFR [kg] 0.00E E E-02 MER [kg] 0.00E E E+00 EEE [MJ] 0.00E E E+00 EET [MJ] 0.00E E E+00 Glossary Environmental Impacts GWP Global warming potential ODP Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer AP Acidification potential of land and water EP Eutrophication potential POCP Formation potential of tropospheric ozone photochemical oxidants ADPE Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources ADPF Abiotic depletion potential for fossil resources FF Fossil fuel consumption Resource Use PERE Use of renewable primary energy excluding renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials PERM Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials PERT Total use of renewable primary energy resources PENRE Use of non-renewable primary energy excluding nonrenewable primary energy resources used as raw materials PENRM Use of non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials PENRT Total use of non-renewable primary energy resources SM Use of secondary material RSF Use of renewable secondary fuels NRSF Use of non-renewable secondary fuels FW Use of net fresh water Output Flows and Waste Categories HWD Hazardous waste disposed NHWD Non-hazardous waste disposed RWD Radioactive waste disposed CRU Components for re-use MFR Materials for recycling MER Materials for energy recovery EE Exported energy per energy carrier For almost all assessed impact categories, the use of primary copper has the greatest contribution to the overall impact. However, the recycling of copper sheet at the end of life has the potential to recover a large proportion of this impact. The use of fossil energy sources has a strong correlation with the GWP. These categories therefore have a similar profile. Impact Assessment Method: TRACI 2.1 Impact Category Impact Units Global warming potential 2.99E+00 kg CO2 eq Acidification potential 2.94E-02 kg SO2 eq Eutrophication potential 5.20E-04 kg N eq Ozone depletion potential 3.50E-08 kg CFC-11 eq Smog potential 1.74E-01 kg O3 eq 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% TRACI 2.1 CML Nov 2010 Impact Assessment Method: CML 2001 Nov 2010 Impact Category Impact Units Global warming potential 2.99E+00 kg CO2 eq Acidification potential 3.29E-02 kg SO2 eq Eutrophication potential 1.02E-03 kg PO4 3- eq Ozone depletion potential 3.20E-08 kg CFC-11 eq Photochemical ozone creation kg C2H4 eq potential 3.59E-04 D C4 A1-A3 12

13 Thank you ASTM International