Aligning systems engineering and project management standards to improve the management of processes
|
|
- Jordan Horn
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Aligning systems engineering and project management standards to improve the management of processes Rui XUE 1,2, Claude BARON 1,2, Philippe ESTEBAN 1,3 Abd-El-Kader SAHRAOUI 1,4 1 CNRS, LAAS, 7 av. du col. Roche, F Toulouse, France {rxue,claude.baron,philippe.esteban,sahraoui}@laas.fr 2 Univ. de Toulouse, INSA, LAAS, F Toulouse, France 3 Univ de Toulouse, UPS, LAAS, F Toulouse, France 4 Univ de Toulouse, UTM, LAAS, F Toulouse, France Abstract. For achieving the success of the project, relying on the systems engineering processes or project management processes is not sufficient and projects often fail due to deficient systems engineering practices or project management practices, or, at least, due to a lack of a coherency/consistency between the two aspects. So it is necessary to correctly implement systems engineering and project management processes during the whole project. This issue of SE and PM integration lies at the very heart of current research concerns. It is at the core of economic and industrial concerns. The goal of this paper is to analyze and compare the five important systems engineering standards (ANSI/EIA 632, ISO/IEC 15288, IEEE 1220, INCOSE Handbook and SEBoK) and the two project management standards (PMBoK and ISO 21500) to evaluate the consistency and inconsistency in order to facilitate the management of the projects and improve their possibility of success. Keywords: systems engineering; project management; standard; comparison and analysis 1 Introduction Systems engineering and project management, whatever the terminology used [1], are both critical to achieve the success of projects. Indeed, with the growing scale of projects, the roles of the project manager and systems engineers are more critical than ever. However, for many years, a cultural barrier has been growing between practitioners of systems engineering and of program management. While project management has overall project accountability and systems engineering has accountability for the technical and systems elements of the project, some systems engineers and project managers have developed the mindset that their work activities are separate from each other rather than part of an organic whole. Consequently, work often costs more, takes longer, and provides a suboptimal solution for the customer or end user. How to bridge the gap between project management and systems engineering recently became of increasing importance in industry. The INCOSE (International Council on Systems Engineering) and the PMI (Project Management Institute) have recognized the importance of integrating systems engineering with project manage- adfa, p. 1, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011
2 ment; together they took out a survey to analyze this question. They identified four methods that can improve the integration of both domains. Exploring the first one, the goal of this paper is to compare the five important systems engineering standards (ANSI/EIA 632 [2], ISO/IEC [3], IEEE 1220 [4], INCOSE HANDBOOK [5] and SEBoK [6]) and the two significant project management standards (PMBoK [7] and ISO [8]) in order to evaluate the coherency of standards with regard to the processes they describe and that are involved through the whole project in order to facilitate the management of the projects and improve their chances of success. Our final goal is to identify among them a pair of most compatible standards from the point of view of the management of system engineering processes and to align them. In section 2, we explain how important integrating systems engineering with project management is and give the background and the research status over this question. Section 3 introduces and compares five systems engineering and two project management standards. Based on the comparison of standards, section 4 gives the conclusion on comparing the most important standards of both domains. 2 Current Situation Schlager [9] was the first to promote systems engineering in 1950s as a systematic approach for engineering complex industrial systems. On the other hand, it was also in the 1950s that organizations started to systematically apply project management tools and techniques to complex engineering projects [10]. However, aligning systems engineering with project management has only been paid attention in the beginning of 21th Century. The point is that the two disciplines can be disjoint, partially intersecting, or one can be seen as a subset of the other. Sharon put forward that systems engineering involves product domain and project management involves project domain [1]. Howard Eisner in [11] not only defines and describes the essentials of project and systems engineering management but shows the critical relationship and interconnection between project management and systems engineering, to enable both engineers and project managers to understand their roles and to collaborate. Fig. 1. The result of the survey [12] One way to address such challenge could be using the systems of systems paradigm [13]. At the normative level, in order to help organizations overcome the resultant inefficiencies of non-collaborative practices, the Project Management Institute (PMI)
3 and the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) both recognized the need to improve integration of practices between their professional communities [14]. In October 2012, they conducted a survey to better understand how PM and SE are lead and could be integrated within the organizations to improve the probability of projects success [15]. As shown in Fig 1, they proposed four methods to reduce the unproductive tension between the systems engineers and project managers. In 2012 too, the INCOSE Chesapeake chapter formed a SE/PM Working Group in order to enhance program success through the improved integration of shared practices [16]. The goal of this paper is to align SE with PM exploring the first option of Fig.1: using standards from both domains and try to align them. 3 Analysis and Comparison of Standards Since 1969, many system SE and PM standards have been elaborated in different application fields, such as military, aeronautics, automatic and management. The ANSI/EIA -632, ISO/IEC and IEEE-1220, INCOSE HANDBOOK, SEBoK, PMBoK and ISO play the most important roles. Section 3.1 gives an overview of SE standards, analyzes and compares them considering their ability to manage SE; Section 3.2 introduces and compares PM standards. 3.1 Comparison of the Systems Engineering Standards Many SE standards have been drawn up in different fields of application, such as military, aeronautics, automatic and management [17,18,19] since The first standard widely used is ANSI/EIA 632; after this standard, many organizations developed their own standard. For example, the ISO/IEC was published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the IEEE [19]. In [19] we introduce the five main SE standards. As some overlap exists between SE and PM, some processes relative to project management domain (Project Management Processes, PMP) can be identified in SE standards. Thus this paper highlights these PMP in each standard. ANS I/EIA 632. This standard provides a systematic approach to engineering and reengineering a system. It defines 13 processes, 34 requirements (in fact like the subprocess) at total. One of the most useful features of this standard is the close connection between the processes; they are coordinated throughout the project. It defines the processes at an intermediate level and includes the whole systems life cycle, but focuses on the conception, development, production, utilization and support, just referring a little to the retirement. It also offers some PMP, such as the planning process, assessment process and controlling process.
4 Fig. 2. Hierarchical organization of the ANSI/EIA 632 standard As shown in the Fig 2, the ANSI/EIA 632 organizes its processes into 5 groups. The Technical Management process group is related to the project management aspect and includes the PMP. Although it defines some processes about the project management, but these processes just involve a little to PM, so they are not enough for the project managers to manage the project. This standard although provides the processes for engineering systems, but it does not define the tool or method for how to implement the processes through the whole project. Fig. 3. Hierarchical organization of the IEEE 1220 standard IEEE This standard defines the requirements for an enterprise s total technical effort related to development of products and processes that will provide life cycle support for products. It focuses on the technical processes and provides an approach fit for products development in a system context. Compared with the ANSI/EIA 632 and ISO/IEC 15288, it intends to define the SE processes at a high level of detail. It also includes the whole systems life cycle, but focuses on the conception, development and production. It just offers one process, the Quality Management requirement that belongs to PMP. As shown in the Fig. 4, this standard is not organized into pro-
5 cess groups. The structure of this standard is not similar to the others. It defines 6 stages for systems engineering, but after we analyze the definition of those stages, in fact, it defines the same systems life cycle as the ISO/IEC Its most useful feature is that it can be used in complement to ISO/IEC This standard just defines one process related to project management processes, the quality management process, because this standard focuses on the development stage of the systems life cycle. Fig. 4. Hierarchical organization of the ISO/IEC standard ISO/IEC This standard provides a comprehensive set of life cycle processes. It defines 26 processes at the process level and includes the whole system life cycle, from conception to the retirement of the systems and the processes cover all the stages. Like the ANSI/EIA 632, it also offers some PMP, such as the configuration management, information management and controlling process. As shown in Fig. 3, the ISO/IEC defines 4 process groups: agreement processes, enterprise processes, project processes and technical processes. The Enterprise Processes and Project Processes groups offer a partial overlap with project management processes. This standard defines more PMP than ANSI/EIA 632. But it has the same problem that is it does not provide nor specify systems engineering methods or procedures to address detailed process requirements for the application of this standard. INCOS E S E HANDBOOK. This standard aligns with the ISO/IEC standard; it defines the same processes as the ISO/IEC 15288, so its organizational structure is the same as the ISO/IEC It also considers both the technical and management processes. It has been the most detailed standard until SEBoK was published in The most interesting feature of this standard is that it not only defines the systems engineering processes, say what to do, but also provides some methods and tools about how to do during the whole project. SEB ok. The SEBoK (Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge) refers to all the other systems engineering standards, such as the ANSI/EIA-632, ISO/IEC and IEEE-1220, but it refers more to the ISO/IEC This standard is the most detailed standard so far.
6 Fig. 5. Hierarchy of the SEBoK standard As the Fig. 5 shows, there are five groups of processes in this standard, the fifth being Systems Engineering Management. So there are some identical processes, such as the systems implementation process, the system integration process and the system validation process. In fact, all the technical processes of the ISO/IEC are included in the SEBoK. The SEBoK just changes some process names, divides and integrates some processes. It uses all the processes from the enterprise processes and project processes of the ISO/IEC-15288, for the aspect of technical processes. It breaks the technical processes of ISO/IEC and assembles them into 14 systems engineering processes. This standard points out the two domains of systems engineering: the systems engineering domain (as technical processes that we introduced before) and the systems engineering management domain (in this paper we call it project management processes) clearly. It describes the processes for both domains at the same level of details. It recognizes the importance of the implementation of management processes during the systems engineering, so it increases the proportion of the management processes. It is the first SE standard that puts forward the importance of systems engineering management explicitly. Conclusion on the Systems Engineering Standar ds. After having analyzed of each SE standard, we compare them according to 9 criteria (in particular considering the System Engineering Management Processes (SEMP)) and defined for each a profile. Content of standard Focus of systems life cycle Table 1. Profiles of the five SE standards ANSI/EIA-632 IEEE-1220 ISO/IEC INCOSE HANDBOOK SEBoK 13 processes 8 processes 25 processes 25 processes 26 processes 34 requirements Conception and development all the systems life cycle all the systems life cycle all the systems life cycle Number of pages all the systems life cycle
7 Level of details Context of application Program and Program and Enterprise Enterprise External environment project environmenronment project envi- environment environment Year of publication Reversion frequency Number of SEMP SEMP s proportion 3/13 1/14 12/25 12/25 12/26 In today's environment, there is an ever-increasing need to develop and produce systems that are robust, reliable, high quality, supportable, cost-effective, and responsive to the needs of the customer or user. With the systems increasing complexity, Systems Engineering standards become more and more detailed. The newest standard SEBoK has more than 800 pages and includes the most a lot of disciplines about systems engineering. The more recent SE standards are mainly based on the ISO/IEC Moreover, as the industrial organizations have paid more and more attention on the project management processes, we can notice that almost half of the processes in the ISO/IEC are related to project management. 3.2 Comparison of the Project Management Standards The PM standards have been developed later than the SE standards but more and more attention has been paid lately on project management. Two important PM standards have been drawn up. The first international PM standard is the PMBoK (A Gu ide to the project management body of knowledge); it was firstly published in 1996, it has been updated five times, and the last version is the fifth version that was published in The second famous standard is the ISO that was published in 2012 for the first time by the ISO. P MBoK. Published by the Project Management Institute, the purpose of this standard is to provide the knowledge, processes, skills, tools and techniques that have a significant impact on the project success [7]. It defines 5 process groups and 10 knowledge areas. It not only defines the processes for PM, but also provides the tools and methods for how to implement the processes. The processes cover the whole systems life cycle, from conception to the retirement of the systems. This standard is the most famous project management guide for the project managers. Table 2. Structure of the PMBoK Five process groups Initiating, Planning, Executing, Monitoring and controlling, Closing Ten knowledge areas Project integration management, Project scope management, Project time management, Project cost management, Project quality management, Project human resource management, Project communications management,
8 Project risk management, Project procurement management, Project stakeholder management. ISO The ISO refers to many standards, such as the PMBoK and the IPMA (International Project Management Association).This standard defines five process groups and ten subjects (the same as the knowledge area in PMBoK). There is less difference between the two PM standards, just the level of detail; the PMBOK is more detailed than ISO Five process groups Initiating, Planning, Implementing Controlling, Closing Table 3. Structure of the ISO Ten subjects Project integration management, Project scope management, Project time management, Project cost management, Project quality management, Project resource management, Project communications management, Project risk management, Project procurement management, Project stakeholder management. According the table 2 and table 3, we can find that there are very little difference between the two standards, just some names of the process groups and the knowledge area. In the ISO 21500, it uses the implementing instead of executing in PMBoK, the controlling instead of the monitoring and controlling and the project resource management instead of the project human resource management. Conclusion on the Project Management Standards. Table 4 compares all the SE PM standards according to 5 criteria. After comparing the two PM standards, we get the conclusion that the contents of the standards are almost the same. But the ISO is only 47 pages and is limited to the introduction of the process, their inputs and their outputs. The ISO processes are more likely to be oriented towards a cascade approach of the scope definition rather than an interactive approach. So the ISO is maybe less attractive for agile organization. The first edition of PMBoK was published very early and it has been updated for four times, so it is more famous and popular than ISO Table 4. Conclusion on the two project management standards PMBoK 5 th ISO Content of standard 5 process groups, 10 knowledge 5 process groups, 10 subjects areas Number of pages Level of details Year of publication Revision frequency
9 3.3 Synthesis All SE standards describe good systems engineering practices. They may suggest a life cycle to provide a context for their recommendation. In short, the EIA-632 standard is more suitable for engineering enterprise-based systems; it focuses more on the technical management, validation and verification aspects. The IEC-15288:2008 standard is more suitable for engineering complex systems, especially projects that cover an entire system life cycle; there are some other SE standards that are based on it. The IEEE-1220 standard is more suitable for smaller systems and focuses on the development stage rather than the system life cycle or the technical management aspects. The INCOSE handbook has the same processes as ISO 15288, but it provides some tools and methods for systems engineering. The SEBoK is the most detailed SE standards, but it also refers more to ISO So for the systems engineering, the ISO15288 is the most suitable SE standard for meeting our requirement. After comparing the two PM standards, we get to the conclusion that the content of the standards are almost the same. But the ISO is only 47 pages and is limited to the introduction of the process, their inputs and their outputs. The ISO processes are more likely to be oriented towards a cascade approach of the scope definition rather than an interactive approach. So the ISO is maybe less attractive than PMBoK for agile organization. Moreover, we can notice that the first edition of PMBoK was published very early and that since it has been updated for four times; it is more famous and more popular than the ISO Conclusion To develop the system quickly and efficiently, it is necessary to correctly implement SE processes and PM processes. One first goal of this paper was to provide enterprises with objective elements to choose two reference standards for their projects from the SE standard and the PM standard. This goal is reached after our analysis of standards from both domains. However, the originality of the paper relies in that it presented an analysis of five SE standards and the two PM standards, considering not only the SE processes, but also the PM ones, in order to be able to align practices and make them more coherent. This paper thus compared the standards from both domains in order to evaluate the compatibility of standards with regard to how they manage Systems Engineering processes. Considering the analysis, the choice of the most compatible ones to guide Systems Engineering on one side and Project Management on the other seems to be the ISO /IEC and the PMBoK. Choosing these standards should thus improve the probability of success of projects. However, aligning standards remains one solution to coordinate practices and processes; according to [12], other means must be associated to this alignment of processes to improve the success of projects, such as sharing responsibilities and decisions for example.
10 References 1. Sharon, A., de Weck, O. L., Dori, D.: Project management vs. systems engineering management: A practitioners view on integrating the project and product domains. Syst. Eng. 14, ( 2011) 2. ANSI/EIA: Standard for Processes for Engineering a System. ANSI/EIA (1998) 3. ISO/IEC/IEEE Systems and Software Eng. - System Life Cycle Processes. IEEE (2008) 4. IEEE Standard for Application and Management of the Systems Eng. Process. IEEE 1999) 5. INCOSE Systems engineering handbook V3.2: A How to Guide for all engineers. INCOSE (2010) 6. Pyster, A., Olwell, D. and el. :Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SE- BoK). BKCASE (2013) 7. PMI: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge: PMBOK V5. PMI (2013) 8. ISO Guidance on Project Management A Pocket Guide. Van Haren Pub (2013) 9. Schlager, K. J.: Systenas Engineering-Key to Modern Development. IRE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (1956) 10. Kwak, Y.H., Carayannis, E.G.: A brief History of Project Management-The story of managing projects. Greenwood Publishing Group (2005) 11. Eisner, H.: Essentials of project and systems eng. management. John Wiley & Sons (2008) 12. Conforto, E., Rossi, M., Rebentisch, E., Oehmen, J., Pacenza, M.: Survey Report: Improving Integration of Program Management and Systems Engineering. MIT Consor-tium for Engineering Program Excellence (2013) 13. Sahraoui, A.E.K., Buede, D.M., Sage, A.P.: systems engineering research. Journal systems science and systems engineering, Springer, Vol17, No3, pp (2008) 14. PMI and Incose Align To Help Organizations Improve Program Success Project Management Institute, To-Help-Organizations-Improve-Program-Success.aspx 15. Oehmen, J., Oppenheim, B. W., Secor, D., Norman, E., Rebentisch, Sopko, E., J. A., Steuber, M., Dove, R., Moghaddam, K., McNeal, S.: The Guide to Lean Enablers for Managing Engineering Programs. Joint MIT-PM I-INCOSE Community of Practice on Lean in Program Management (2012). 16. Systems Engineering Project Management (SE PM) Working Group INCOSE Chesapeake Chapter Chesapeake Chapter of INCOSE. 17. An Overview of the Systems Engineering Knowledge Domain - Recherche Google 18. Sahraoui, A.: Processes for Engineering a System an Introduction to Processes, Methods and Tools. In Information and Communication Technologies, pp (2006) 19. Xue, R., Baron, C., Esteban, P.: Managing systems engineering processes: a multi-standard approach. In 8th annual IEEE international systems conference, in press.
Managing Systems Engineering Processes: a Multi- Standard Approach
Managing Systems Engineering Processes: a Multi- Standard Approach Rui Xue, Claude Baron, Philippe Esteban, Hamid Demmou To cite this version: Rui Xue, Claude Baron, Philippe Esteban, Hamid Demmou. Managing
More informationINTEGRATION of PROJECT MANAGEMENT and SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Copyright 2018 by Yves Theriault. Permission granted to INCOSE to publish and use. INTEGRATION of PROJECT MANAGEMENT and SYSTEMS ENGINEERING San Diego INCOSE Mini-Conference December 1, 2018 John Wood,
More informationRui Xue. To cite this version: HAL Id: tel https://hal.laas.fr/tel v2
Improving Cooperation between Systems Engineers and Project Managers in Engineering Projects - Towards the alignment of Systems Engineering and Project Management standards and guides Rui Xue To cite this
More informationA framework to improve performance measurement in engineering projects
A framework to improve performance measurement in engineering projects Li Zheng, Claude Baron, Philippe Esteban, Rui ue, Qiang Zhang To cite this version: Li Zheng, Claude Baron, Philippe Esteban, Rui
More informationEstablishing Profiles for Systems Engineering Standards: A Great Help for Companies to Manage Their Processes
Establishing Profiles for Systems Engineering Standards: A Great Help for Companies to Manage Their Processes Rui Xue, Claude Baron, Philippe Esteban, Qiang Zhang To cite this version: Rui Xue, Claude
More informationSystems and software engineering Software life cycle processes
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC/ IEEE 12207 First edition 2017-11 Systems and software engineering Software life cycle processes Ingénierie des systèmes et du logiciel Processus du cycle de vie du logiciel
More informationThis document is a preview generated by EVS
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC/ IEEE 12207 First edition 2017-11 Systems and software engineering Software life cycle processes Ingénierie des systèmes et du logiciel Processus du cycle de vie du logiciel
More informationSYSTEM ENGINEERING FRAMEWORK FOR MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS
SYSTEM ENGINEERING FRAMEWORK FOR MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS M.Messaadia 1,2, M. Djeghaba 2, AEK. Sahraoui 1,3 (1) LAAS-CNRS, 7 Av colonel Roch 31077Toulouse, cedex04 (2) LASA-Université Badji mokhtar Annaba
More informationSystems Engineering Concept
Systems Engineering Concept WHITE PAPER February 2017 The Systems Engineering Concept provides practical hands-on methods and tools, that enable companies to meet today s global business challenges through
More informationFROM PLM TO ERP : A SOFTWARE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INTEGRATION
FROM PLM TO ERP : A SOFTWARE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INTEGRATION Nafisa Osman 1 and Abd-El-Kader Sahraoui 2 1 AlmedtechInc..and University SUST Khartoum, Sudan 2 LAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, UT2J, Toulouse,
More informationBoost Your Skills with On-Site Courses Tailored to Your Needs
Boost Your Skills with On-Site Courses Tailored to Your Needs www.aticourses.com The Applied Technology Institute specializes in training programs for technical professionals. Our courses keep you current
More informationSystems and software engineering Life cycle management. Part 4: Systems engineering planning
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC/ IEEE 24748-4 First edition 2016-05-15 Systems and software engineering Life cycle management Part 4: Systems engineering planning Ingénierie des systèmes Gestion du cycle
More informationQualification Profile
Dr. David Endler WORTH IT! Qualification Profile Achieving excellence in Systems Engineering requires professional expertise. Take advantage of my proven SE knowledge for the benefit of your organization.
More informationComparison of project management methodologies: prince 2. versus PMBOK for it projects
Int. Journal of Applied Sciences and Engineering Research, Vol. 4, Issue 4, 2015 www.ijaser.com 2015 by the authors Licensee IJASER- Under Creative Commons License 3.0 editorial@ijaser.com Research article
More informationPattern Repository for Support of Project Management Capabilities
Pattern Repository for Support of Project Management Capabilities Solvita Berzisa Information Technology Institute, Riga Technical University, Kalku, Riga, Latvia solvita.berzisa@rtu.lv Abstract. Project
More informationFacilitated Methods: Division of Blash Enterprises Inc. Copyright 2017 All rights reserve. Greta Blash, PMP, PMI-ACP, PMI-PBA Facilitated Methods
Greta Blash, PMP, PMI-ACP, PMI-PBA Facilitated Methods PMBOK Guide and Standard Project Management Framework changes 6 th edition changes Identifies a subset of project management that is generally recognized
More informationSystems Engineering & Project Management INCOSE UK / APM Joint Working Group
Systems Engineering & Project Management INCOSE UK / APM Joint Working Group David Cole, Andrew Gray; Systems Thinking SIG INCOSE UK Bristol Local Group, 14 May 2018 Agenda Introduction to the APM/ INCOSEUK
More informationSystem engineering approach for safety management of complex systems
System engineering approach for safety management of complex systems R. Guillerm, H. Demmou and N. Sadou CNRS ; LAAS, 7 avenue du colonel Roche, F-31077 Toulouse, France University of Toulouse ; UPS, INSA,
More informationProject Management Framework
Project Management Framework Study Notes PMI, PMP, CAPM, PMBOK, PM Network and the PMI Registered Education Provider logo are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc. Points to Note Please
More informationExactly So what is railway systems engineering?
Exactly So what is railway systems engineering? Bruce Elliott University of Birmingham 19th April 2007 (For a copy of this presentation, see www.incose.org.uk/rig.htm) Are the following railway SE activities?
More informationWhy does the PMBOK change? Ensures standards are up-to to-date and reflect ever-evolving evolving knowledge in the profession Standards are aligned, i
PMBOK 4 th Edition Overview Colleen A. McGraw 16 October 2009 Why does the PMBOK change? Ensures standards are up-to to-date and reflect ever-evolving evolving knowledge in the profession Standards are
More informationHow the Rational Unified Process Supports ISO 12207
How the Rational Unified Process Supports ISO 12207 by Philippe Kruchten Director of Process Development Rational Software Canada "My organization must comply with the ISO Standard 12207; can the RUP help
More informationINCOSE Certification for Systems Engineers & Systems Engineering: Fundamental Maxims
INCOSE Certification for Systems Engineers & Systems Engineering: Fundamental Presented to The INCOSE Swiss Chapter December 2012 Sysnovation, LLC 13741 Johnson Memorial Drive Shakopee, MN 55379 USA www.sysnovation.com
More informationComparison of ISO Draft Version and PMBOK Guide 4 th Edition 1
Comparison of Draft Version and PMBOK Guide 4 th Edition 1 Stanisław Gasik, Ph. D.; sgasik@sybena.pl; www.sybena.pl Table of Contents HISTORY OF... 2 BASIC CONCEPTS... 2 PROJECT DEFINITION... 2 TYPES OF
More informationComparison of ISO and PMBOK Guide 1
Stanisław Gasik, PhD, sgasik@sybena.pl Comparison of and PMBOK Guide 1 Table of Contents HISTORY OF... 2 BASIC CONCEPTS... 2 PROJECT DEFINITION... 2 TYPES OF PROJECTS... 3 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCESSES...
More informationManaging Trust in Models
Managing Trust in Models V1.2.2 Bill Schindel, ICTT System Sciences schindel@ictt.com Contents What brought me to this subject The growing importance of model credibility V&V of Models vs. V&V of Systems
More informationA Kind of Summary: Enterprise Architecture for Business-IT Alignment. Prof. Dr. Knut Hinkelmann MSc Business Information Systems
A Kind of Summary: Enterprise Architecture for Business-IT Alignment Model Languages and Architectures Overall ArchiMate, (BMM) Business Architecture BPMN, CMMN, Organisation, Process Map, BMM, Products
More informationDesigning Systems Engineering Profiles for VSEs
Designing Systems Engineering Profiles for VSEs Claude Y. Laporte 1 Rory V. O Connor 2, 3 1 École de technologie supérieure, Montréal, Canada 2 Lero, the Irish Software Engineering Research Centre, Ireland
More informationCopyright protected. Use is for Single Users only via a VHP Approved License. For information and printed versions please see
PRAXIS A POCKET GUIDE Other publications by Van Haren Publishing Van Haren Publishing (VHP) specializes in titles on Best Practices, methods and standards within four domains: - IT and IT Management -
More informationSystems and software engineering Life cycle management. Part 6: System integration engineering
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ISO/IEC TS 24748-6 First edition 2016-12-01 Systems and software engineering Life cycle management Part 6: System integration engineering Ingénierie des systèmes et du logiciel
More informationInformation Technology. Project Management, Seventh Edition
Solutions to Accompany Information Technology Project Management, Seventh Edition ISBN-10: 1133526853 ISBN-13: 978-1133526858 Course Technology MIS Series Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP Created November 27,
More informationSYSML 2.0 UPDATE. Hedley Apperly VP Solution Management. May 2015
SYSML 2.0 UPDATE Hedley Apperly VP Solution Management May 2015 INTRODUCTION 2 WHAT IS MBSE Model-based systems engineering (MBSE) is the formalized application of modeling to support system requirements,
More informationFor the PMP Exam using PMBOK Guide 5 th Edition. PMI, PMP, PMBOK Guide are registered trade marks of Project Management Institute, Inc.
For the PMP Exam using PMBOK Guide 5 th Edition PMI, PMP, PMBOK Guide are registered trade marks of Project Management Institute, Inc. 1 Contacts Name: Khaled El-Nakib, MSc, PMP, PMI-RMP URL: http://www.khaledelnakib.com
More informationPART THREE - WORK PLAN AND IV&V METHODOLOGY WORK PLAN. FL IT IV&V Work Plan
WORK PLAN FL IT IV&V Work Plan PART THREE - WORK PLAN AND IV&V METHODOLOGY ID Task Name Duration 1 FL IT IV&V Project Work Plan 261 days 2 DDI / SI Contract Award 0 days 3 Project Initiation and Planning
More informationINTERNATIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT STANDARD GUIDA ALLACQUISIZIONE DELLE CREDENZIALI PMP R E CAPM R DEL PMI R
INTERNATIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT STANDARD GUIDA ALLACQUISIZIONE DELLE CREDENZIALI PMP R E CAPM R DEL PMI R page 1 / 5 page 2 / 5 international project management standard pdf Published by Elsevier in collaboration
More informationPROJECT MANAGEMENT KNOWLEDGE RETRIEVAL: PROJECT CLASSIFICATION
ISSN 1691-5402 ISBN 978-9984-44-071-2 Environment. Technology. Resources Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific and Practical Conference. Volume I1 Rēzeknes Augstskola, Rēzekne, RA Izdevniecība,
More informationConsidering the systems engineering leading indicators to measure projects performance
Considering the systems engineering leading indicators to measure projects performance Li Zheng To cite this version: Li Zheng. Considering the systems engineering leading indicators to measure projects
More informationProject Management A Systems Approach To Planning Scheduling And Controlling
Project Management A Systems Approach To Planning Scheduling And Controlling PROJECT MANAGEMENT A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO PLANNING SCHEDULING AND CONTROLLING PDF - Are you looking for project management a
More informationPMBOK SIXTH EDITION CHANGES
PMBOK SIXTH EDITION CHANGES Re-named Knowledge Areas The following Knowledge Areas have been re-named as per the latest sixth edition of PMBOK Guide. Project Time Management is now called as Project Schedule
More informationManaging Information Technology Projects, Sixth Edition
Solutions to Accompany Managing Information Technology Projects, Sixth Edition Kathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP different from the U.S. Edition. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly
More informationDeveloping Standards for Systems of Systems (SoS) Engineering IS0/IEC/IEEE 21839: SoS Considerations through the Lifecycle of a System
Developing Standards for Systems of Systems (SoS) Engineering IS0/IEC/IEEE 21839: SoS Considerations through the Lifecycle of a System Mr. Garry Roedler Lockheed Martin garry.j.roedler@lmco.com Dr. Judith
More informationPortfolio, Program and Project Management Using COBIT 5
DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE Portfolio, Program and Project Using COBIT 5 By Sunil Bakshi, CISA, CRISC, CISM, CGEIT, ABCI, AMIIB, BS 25999 LI, CEH, CISSP, ISO 27001 LA, MCA, PMP COBIT Focus 11 September 2017 Many
More informationProject Management Process Groups. PMP Study Group Based on the PMBOK Guide 4 th Edition
Project Management Process Groups PMP Study Group Based on the PMBOK Guide 4 th Edition Introduction PM Process Groups In order for a project to be successful, the project team must: Select appropriate
More informationOPM The Missing Link. Jane Betterton, BS,ChE., PMP PMIRGC JaneBetterton.com/ BTSResults.com
OPM The Missing Link Jane Betterton, BS,ChE., PMP PMIRGC 11-2-18 Jane@BTSResults.com JaneBetterton.com/ BTSResults.com Presentation Overview In this session you will learn how PMI s latest foundational
More informationOPM The Missing Link
OPM The Missing Link Jane Betterton, BS,ChE., PMP PMIRGC 11 2 18 Jane@BTSResults.com JaneBetterton.com/ BTSResults.com Presentation Overview In this session you will learn how PMI s latest foundational
More informationGuide to SE and P3M Processes
Systems Engineering and Project (SEPM) Joint Working Group Guide to SE and P3M Processes Issue 1.0 Dec 2016 Summary The aim of this document is to collate and compare process frameworks from within the
More information7.11b: Quality in Project Management: A Comparison of PRINCE2 Against PMBOK
by Peter Whitelaw, Rational Management Pty Ltd, Melbourne Introduction This comparison takes each part of the PMBOK and provides comments on what match there is with elements of the PRINCE2 method. It's
More informationEmbracing Change Through Simple Change Control
PM Tools Workshops Embracing Change Through Simple Change Control Matthew J. Weaver, PMP, CSM, ITIL President/CEO, Project Weavers, LLC PMI, PMBOK, PMP, and CAPM are registered marks of the Project Management
More informationAPPLICATION OF BPMN FOR THE PMBOK STANDARD MODELLING TO SCALE PROJECT MANAGEMENT EFFORTS IN IT ENTERPRISES
Key words: PMBOK, BPMN, project management Tomasz KRUŻEL Jan WEREWKA* APPLICATION OF BPMN FOR THE PMBOK STANDARD MODELLING TO SCALE PROJECT MANAGEMENT EFFORTS IN IT ENTERPRISES The project management scaling
More informationFrequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Standards Updates
Revised: 1 August 2017 The PMBOK Guide Sixth Edition and the Agile Practice Guide bundle Q. When will the PMBOK Guide Sixth Edition and the Agile Practice Guide be published? A. Both publications will
More informationA BPM Methodology What Is It and Why It Is Important
September 02, 2014 Harmon on BPM Paul Harmon A BPM Methodology What Is It and Why It Is Important As many readers know, I began working in the business process area many decades ago, when I worked for
More informationDeveloped by: Steven Jacobs, Eck Doerry
Developed by: Steven Jacobs, Eck Doerry 1 Consequences of Bad Requirements Engineering http://www.knovelblogs.com/2012/08/30/the-importance-of-requirements-engineering/ 2 Building an efficient organization
More informationIllustration of the information model for complex system. modeling: from requirement to V V
Illustration of the information model for complex system modeling: from requirement to V V Romaric Guillerm, Hamid Demmou, Nabil Sadou To cite this version: Romaric Guillerm, Hamid Demmou, Nabil Sadou.
More informationTowards Higher Configuration Management Maturity
Towards Higher Configuration Management Maturity Masoud Niknam and Jivka Ovtcharova IMI, Karlsruhe Institute for Technology, Germany masoud.niknam@kit.edu Abstract. Configuration Management (CM) as a discipline
More informationMay 2018 Latest update. ISO/IEC Understanding the requirements of ISO/IEC :2011 and ISO/IEC FDIS
May 2018 Latest update ISO/IEC 20000 Understanding the requirements of ISO/IEC 20000-1:2011 and ISO/IEC FDIS 20000-1 Mapping guide ISO/IEC 20000 Understanding the requirements of ISO/IEC 20000-1:2011 and
More informationCourse Title: Planning and Managing Agile Projects
Course Title: Planning and Managing Agile Projects Course ID: BA15 Credits: 21 PDUs Course Duration: 3 days (Live in person class only) Course Level: Basic/Intermediate Course Description: This 3-day course
More information9/2/2015. Steering the Course: How to Capture Business Needs vs. Business Processes. What Does Good Business Analysis Take? General Definitions
9/2/2015 General Definitions Needs circumstances in which something is necessary, or requires some course of action Steering the Course: How to Capture Business Needs vs. Business Processes Processes are
More informationChapter 1: Introduction to Project Management. IT Project Management, 6 th Edition Chapter 1
Chapter 1: Introduction to Project Management 1 Learning Objectives Understand the growing need for better project management, especially for information technology projects Explain what a project is and
More informationInformation technology Process assessment Process assessment model for software testing
Provläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC 33063 First edition 2015-08-15 Information technology Process assessment Process assessment model for software testing Technologies de l information
More informationExcellent Governance through Professional Project Management
Excellent Governance through Professional Project Management AstroWix Corporation USA 2010 Corporate Ridge Drive Mclean, VA 22012 Phone: +1 703 749 7711 Email: info@astrowix.com India Offices Delhi NCR
More informationMay 2018 Latest update. ISO/IEC Understanding the requirements of ISO/IEC :2011 and ISO/IEC FDIS
May 2018 Latest update ISO/IEC 20000 Understanding the requirements of ISO/IEC 20000-1:2011 and ISO/IEC FDIS 20000-1 Mapping guide ISO/IEC 20000 Understanding the requirements of ISO/IEC 20000-1:2011 and
More informationInformation and Software Technology
Information and Software Technology 51 (2009) 1066 1080 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Information and Software Technology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/infsof Software product integration:
More informationProtect Your ITIL Investment with VeriSM
Protect Your ITIL Investment with VeriSM Taking Service Management to the Next Level By Stephen Mann Contents 1 The Challenge... 3 1.1 The Current State of ITSM... 3 1.2 The Need for VeriSM... 4 1.3 VeriSM
More informationDOWNLOAD OR READ : PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN EASY STEPS PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI
DOWNLOAD OR READ : PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN EASY STEPS PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI Page 1 Page 2 project management in easy steps project management in easy pdf project management in easy steps Project management
More informationBASICS of CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT
BASICS of CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT 1 Outline What is a project? What is a construction project? Program & Portfolio Characteristics of a Construction Life Cycle Areas to Manage in Construction Comparison
More informationSAFe in a Nutshell SCALED AGILE FRAMEWORK
SAFe in a Nutshell SCALED AGILE FRAMEWORK CINDY LAKE INTRODUCTION Education MBA/ITM Master of Business Administration/Informational Technology Management 2010 The UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, Salt Lake City,
More informationCertified Associate in Project Management (CAPM)
Certified Associate in Project Management (CAPM) E X A M I N AT I O N CO N T E N T O U T L I N E Project Management Institute PMI Certified Associate in Project Management (CAPM) Exam Content Outline October
More informationETLS Validation & Verification University of St. Thomas. John Engelman Fall 2016
ETLS 509 - Validation & Verification University of St. Thomas John Engelman Fall 2016 ETLS 509 - Session 3 Review Validation process Verification process Example verification matrix (a small portion) Boeing
More informationBA25-Managing the Agile Product Development Life Cycle
BA25-Managing the Agile Product Development Life Cycle Credits: 28 PDUs / 4 Days Course Level: Intermediate/Advanced Course Description: This 4-day course explores how adapting Agile values and principles
More informationProject Management Professional (PMP) Exam Review
Project Management Professional (PMP) Exam Review Unauthorized distribution is strictly prohibited. These resources are for 3FOLD Education Centre students. PMI, PMP, PMBOK and the PMI Registered Education
More informationEconomic Impact of Reuse on Systems Engineering
Economic Impact of Reuse on Systems Engineering Dr. Ricardo Valerdi Massachusetts Institute of Technology rvalerdi@mit.edu 4 th Annual IeMRC Conference Loughborough University September 2, 2009 IeMRC 4
More informationSystems Engineering Processes and Requirements
NASA PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES This Document Is Uncontrolled When Printed. Check the NASA Online Directives Information System (NODIS) Library. Verify that this is the correct version before use: http://nodis.hq.nasa.gov/library/directives/nasa-wide/tbd
More informationNAVIGATING PMO IMPROVEMENT WITH OPM3
NAVIGATING PMO IMPROVEMENT WITH OPM3 MAY 8, 2014 PITTSBURGH PMI CHAPTER CHRIS ULDRIKS PRESIDENT & PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT OPM3, PMBOK, and PMI are registered trademarks of the Project Management Institute
More informationKathy Schwalbe, Ph.D., PMP
Solutions to Accompany Information Technology Project Management, Eighth Edition Comprehensive package: Solutions Manual, Instructor's Resource Manual, Additional Cases, Answer keys, Solutions Files Excel
More informationSoftware Project Management IT Project Management Overview of Project Management
Software Project Management IT Project Management Overview of Project Management Umair Shafique (Gold Medalist) Lecturer uthaly.com 1 Lecture Outline What is a Project Details relevant to Project What
More informationRepresenting IT Projects Risk Management Best Practices as a Metamodel
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 7, No. 5, 2017, 2062-2067 2062 Representing IT Projects Risk Management Best Practices as a Metamodel Abir El Yamami Souad Ahriz Khalifa Mansouri
More informationINCOSE Principles. Approved 12 July 2015
INCOSE Principles Approved 12 July 2015 Background. During the June 2014 INCOSE Board of Directors meeting, the Board discussed access to various INCOSE products (those already existing and those in development)
More informationSystems and software engineering Measurement process
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC/ IEEE 15939 First edition 2017-05 Systems and software engineering Measurement process Ingénierie des systèmes et du logiciel Processus de mesure Reference number ISO/IEC/IEEE
More informationQuality management systems Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001:2008 in local government
Provläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 18091 First edition 2014-02-15 Quality management systems Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001:2008 in local government Systèmes de management
More informationQuality Assurance for Systems Engineering (INSE 6280/2-WW)
Course Outline Quality Assurance for Systems (INSE 6280/2-WW) Preliminary Notions Systems Life Cycle Processes Course Project 2 Instructor: Dr. J. Bentahar Office: EV007.630 Lectures: Thursday, 17h45 20h15
More informationINFORMATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT - PART OF THE INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS CIBINIENSIS TECHNICAL SERIES Vol. LXVI 2015 DOI: 10.1515/aucts-2015-0036 INFORMATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT - PART OF THE INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANEA Constantin Adrian Faculty of
More informationThe Value in Aligning Change Management and Project Management
The Value in Aligning Change Management and Project Management Waffa Karkukly, PhD, PMP, ACP, CMP info@globalpmosolutions.ca http://globalpmosolutions.ca About Me Dr. Waffa Karkukly, PMP, ACP, CMP Managing
More informationTowards Higher Configuration Management Maturity
Towards Higher Configuration Management Maturity Masoud Niknam, Jivka Ovtcharova To cite this version: Masoud Niknam, Jivka Ovtcharova. Towards Higher Configuration Management Maturity. Alain Bernard;
More informationInformation Technology Project Management Fifth Edition
Information Technology Project Management Fifth Edition By Jack T. Marchewka Northern Illinois University 5-1 Copyright 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Project Planning: Scope and the Work Breakdown Structure
More informationInformation Technology Project Management, Eighth Edition. Note: See the text itself for full citations.
Note: See the text itself for full citations. } Describe the five project management process groups, the typical level of activity for each, and the interactions among them } Understand how the project
More informationInformation Technology. Project Management, Sixth Edition
Solutions to Accompany Information Technology Project Management, Sixth Edition ISBN-10: 0324786921 ISBN-13: 9780324786927 Course Technology MIS Series Companion Web Site: www.cengage.com/mis/schwalbe
More information"Charting the Course to Your Success!" Planning and Managing Agile Projects Course Summary
Course Summary Description This 3-day course aims at introducing its attendees to the core values, principles, and practices of Agile. This course is a more elaborate version of the Certified Scrum Master
More informationSoftware Quality Assurance Dashboard for Renault Software Robustness plan with SQUORE tool
Software Quality Assurance Dashboard for Renault Software Robustness plan with SQUORE tool Valérie Russo, Alexandre Oriou, Flavien Huynh, Claude Baron To cite this version: Valérie Russo, Alexandre Oriou,
More informationTHE NEW ISO STANDARDS ON MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS & THE EFQM EXCELLENCE MODEL
THE NEW ISO STANDARDS ON MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS & THE EFQM EXCELLENCE MODEL 1. Introduction In the year 2015 two ISO standards were revised. ISO 9001:2015, released on October 1, and ISO 14001:2015, released
More informationSyStemS engineering Handbook
s Engineering Handbook SYSTEMS ENGINEERING HANDBOOK A GUIDE FOR SYSTEM LIFE CYCLE PROCESSES AND ACTIVITIES FOURTH EDITION INCOSE-TP-2003-002-04 2015 Prepared by: International Council on s Engineering
More informationPSM. Practical Software and Systems Measurement A foundation for objective project management. PSM TWG ISO/IEC and IEEE Standards.
Practical Software and Systems Measurement A foundation for objective project management PSM PSM TWG ISO/IEC and IEEE Standards March 29, 2006 PSM 1 29 Mar 06 Current Standard Activities ISO/IEC 15939,
More informationSystems and software engineering Measurement process
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC/ IEEE 15939 First edition 2017-05 Systems and software engineering Measurement process Ingénierie des systèmes et du logiciel Processus de mesure Reference number ISO/IEC/IEEE
More informationISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Systems and software engineering System life cycle processes IEEE
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC 15288 IEEE Std 15288-2008 Second edition 2008-02-01 Systems and software engineering System life cycle processes Ingénierie des systèmes et du logiciel Processus du cycle
More informationISO 45001:2018. ISO 45001:2018 (en) Occupational health and safety management systems Requirements with guidance for use
(en) Occupational health and safety management systems Requirements with guidance for use Table of contents 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions 4 Context of the organization 4.1 Understanding
More informationProject Management Certificate Program Program Duration: 3 2-day modules Facilitator: Dennis Evans
Xavier University has been successfully delivering project management training to participants from all industries for nearly twenty years. As the Project Management Institute (PMI) gained additional momentum
More informationPMBOK 2012 FIFTH EDITION CHANGES
PMBOK 2012 FIFTH EDITION CHANGES 1 Scope of Update Alignment with ISO 21500 Ensure harmonization with any other relevant PMI standards. Reposition Section 3 (The Standard for Project Management) as a stand-alone,
More informationProject Management Professional (PMP)
Project Management Professional (PMP) E X A M I N AT I O N CO N T E N T O U T L I N E Project Management Institute Project Management Professional (PMP) Examination Content Outline June 2015 Published
More informationA Framework for Integrating Systems and Software Engineering
A Framework for Integrating Systems and Software Engineering NDIA Systems Engineering Conference San Diego, California Art Pyster art.pyster@stevens.edu Richard Turner richard.turner@stevens.edu October
More information[PDF] Project Management: A Systems Approach To Planning, Scheduling, And Controlling
[PDF] Project Management: A Systems Approach To Planning, Scheduling, And Controlling The bestselling project management text for students and professionalsâ now updated and expanded This Eleventh Edition
More informationProject Management: A Systems Approach To Planning, Scheduling, And Controlling PDF
Project Management: A Systems Approach To Planning, Scheduling, And Controlling PDF The bestselling project management text for students and professionalsâ now updated and expanded This Eleventh Edition
More information