From Stand-Alone Indicators to Valid Inputs for Operational Safety
|
|
- Albert Gregory
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Maintenance SPIs: From Stand-Alone Indicators to Valid Inputs for Operational Safety Jorge Leite TAP Maintenance & Engineering VP Quality November 14th, 2012 Olten, Switzerland 1
2 Safety Management essentials SMS is supposed to do one simple thing: allocate resources against risk...let me give you four simple audit questions that are really easy to answer if you have an effective SMS, and impossible to answer if you haven t: 1. What is most likely to be the cause of your next accident or serious incident? 2. How do you know that? 3. What are you doing about it? 4. Is it working? Source: Flight Safety Foundation, Aero Safety World, May We need to manage Safety, but 2. we cannot manage what we cannot measure, so 3. we need indicators (SPIs) to measure the system s performance. 2
3 Summary Overview TAP M&E: overview and SMS roadmap SMS Rules: recap and update SMS Connections in the MRO World From a Maintenance Threat to an Unrecoverable End State What makes a meaningful Maintenance SPI? How to choose Maintenance SPIs? 3
4 TAP M&E Overview TAP, SGPS, S.A. TAPGER, S.A. TAP, S.A. Source: TAP Portugal EU-OPS IOSA TRTO JAR-STD EASA Part M EASA Part 145 EASA Part 21 Etc. EASA Part 147 Aero LB, S.A. Brasil EASA Part 145 Etc. 4
5 SMS Scope at TAP M&E Part M, Part 145, Part 147 and Part 21 ICAO Doc Ed. 2 Stand-alone policies and procedures Safety requirements from Customers Extension to Part 147 planned for 2013 TAP M&E: part of TAP Portugal IOSA requirements Air Operations Implementing Rule (EC) 965/2012, ORO.GEN.200 EASp requirements Waiting for Portugal SSP requirements and targets ICAO Doc Ed. 3 ICAO Annex 19 5
6 SMS Roadmap at TAP M&E Proactive and Predictive analysis SPIs and Safety Improvement Plans SMS Manual, Safety Office, Reactive analysis Reporting, MORs, Safety Investigations 2010 Gap Analysis, Safety Culture survey Safety Training, Safety Promotion campaign 2009 Safety Policy, Safety Objectives Safety Commitment from top management 2008 Risk assessment procedures Risk Management Manual 2007 Analysis of Safety Reports and Technical Incidents Transition from WinBASIS to SENTINEL 2006 Analysis of ICAO Doc Ed. 1 Outreach presentation to the top management 6
7 SMS Implementation Status in TAP M&E (Nov. 2012) 60% 30% 75% Picture Source: Mitre Aviation Institute, VA, USA 40% 7
8 SMS in EU Rules Basic Regulation SMS RMT.0262 (MDM.060) Opinion expected 2014 Airworthiness Regulation Initial Airworthiness Flight Standards Regulation Air Crew ATM / ANS Regulation ATCO Aerodromes Regulation ADR SMS MDM.055 ToR published 18/Jul/2011 NPA expected Dec Opinion/Decision 2nd Qrtr Regulation 1 year later Regulation Continuing Airworthiness EASA Conference, 13/Dec/2012, Cologne Regulation Air Operations Regulation Third Country Operators Regulation ATM / ANS Oversight Regulation ANS Providers Regulation AUR & ACAS II Regulation SERA SMS Part-ORA Especially ORA.GEN.200 SMS Part-ORO Especially ORO.GEN.200 8
9 SMS Connections in the MRO World A Mx organization links its SMS upstream (NAA and operators) and downstream (suppliers and contracted organizations) When contracted organizations contract further downstream, the Mx organization SMS should proceed downstream Source: TAP Maintenance & Engineering Problems with different: Cultures? Customers? Suppliers? Organizations? 9
10 Fatalities Rate must be reduced Accidents today are rare events and their causes are multiple and random How to reduce even more? Fatal accidents and fatalities rate have dropped to a very low value Further drop is a challenge Almost flat trend! Source: Trevor Woods, EASA We cure the causes of these random accidents; but, if nothing had been done, probably that accident would not repeat itself anyway Source: Bem Alcott, CAA-UK 10
11 When Maintenance is a Threat IATA Safety Report 2011: 40% of maintenance related accidents involved landing gear malfunctions Maintenance issues were the primary cause in 9% of the accidents Aircraft technical faults and maintenance issues was the 2 nd most frequent category of contributing factors to accidents Note: example, not to be used in real work Source: TAP Maintenance & Engineering 11
12 Maintenance Fault Tree (example) Note: example, not to be used in real work Maintenance ENGINE Spark plug fail Lack of fuel LOSS OF THRUST Lack of air Auto-thrust malfunction Source: TAP Maintenance & Engineering 12
13 Different Faults, same Undesirable State The same Undesirable State may result from two different Mx fault trees and Mx main causes Probably (due to the actual low accident rate and random causes) repetition of the same tree will not be frequent What is the value of setting up MxSPIs to measure performance of past causes? Source: TAP Maintenance & Engineering 13
14 The need for MxSPIs ICAO Doc Ed Safety performance monitoring and measurement A service provider shall, as part of the SMS safety assurance activities, develop and maintain the necessary means to verify the safety performance of the organization in reference to the safety performance indicators and safety performance targets of the SMS, and to validate the effectiveness of safety risk controls. 14
15 Deming Cycle in TAP M&E SMS TAP M&E is also certified per ISO 9001 and EN 9110, which provides broad QMS experience in: The same approach has been followed during the development of SMS in TAP M&E Applying the Deming Cycle Mapping Mx processes Using QMS KPIs Setting targets and alerts Doing management reviews Setting action plans Continuous improvement Hazard Identification Safety Improvement Plans Risk Management SPIs Safety Performance Measurement 15
16 Choosing MxSPIs MxSPIs are data based expressions of the frequency (ratios) of occurrence of some events, incidents or reports Identified by the SMS of the Mx organization Obvious Linked to safety concerns Tracking significant occurrences Aligned with the safety targets of the Mx organization Short-term Tactical Reflecting the safety performance of the Mx organization Measurable Numerical 16
17 Validating useful MxSPIs It costs not more than it gives back It is not possible to manipulate Cost-effective Resistant to bias It covers all aspects that are relevant Valid Representative It measures what we want to measure, well correlated Reliable Sensitive It is not dependent on conditions, situations, individuals It is responsive to changes, statistically significant, short timed 17
18 Types of MxSPIs MxSPIs in development at TAP M&E are classified in the following 3 categories, depending on their strategic scope: Mx organization Monitor Safety Objectives and Safety Targets Monitor Risk level Control impact on Survivability, Competitiveness and Corporate Image Control impact on Credit Rating and Insurance Cost Assess contingency preparedness and management of change Control suppliers, contracted and subcontracted organizations 18
19 Types of MxSPIs (cont.) SSP (connected to End State analysis) Assure regulatory compliance Satisfy operator s safety goals Assure safety for the public domain, community, EU aviation image Customer s safety objectives Assure contractual safety compliance Satisfy customer s safety goals Provide competitive edge Enable continuous contract monitoring Expand Mx organization market share (differentiation) 19
20 Purpose of MxSPIs In relation to each MxSPI, the following questions must be answered: 1. Which risk control (barrier) is weaker and needs to be reinforced? 2. What specifically is the issue? What does that weakness relate to? 3. What is the most appropriate metric for the indicator? 4. How will the data be collected, and who will do it? 5. How will the results be monitored and corrective actions identified? 6. What target would we aim for? 7. What alert level would we set up? 20
21 Sources of data for MxSPIs Reactive analysis of past outcomes and events ASR, MOR, SAFA Incident and Accident Reports Hazards identified Internal Safety Investigations Proactive analysis of present or real time situations ASR Voluntary Safety Reports Safety Surveys and Safety Audits Safety Studies and Safety Improvement Plans (SIP) Trend analysis Predictive data gathering to identify possible negative future outcomes or events FDM, Continuous monitoring of Mx processes Statistical and probability analysis 21
22 Facts about MxSPIs There is no single MxSPI apropriate to all Mx organizations Chosen MxSPIs should correlate to relevant safety objectives It is difficult to choose good (and few) MxSPIs It s easy to end up with a lot of indicators But, in reality, they may fail to give accurate trend information Registered in the safety library with relevant information 22
23 MxSPIs: based on TAP Portugal End State data End State (ES) Undesirable State (US) MxSPI Unstable Approach Mass and Balance Occurrence Runway Excursion (EASp) EGPWS/GPWS Windshear N/A Rejected Take-Off Engine Loss of Power Hard/Heavy Landing Brakes Failure Call Sign Confusion COM Technical Incident Mid-Air Collision (EASp) Altitude Deviation NAV Technical Incident TCAS RA TCAS Technical Incident Controlled Flight Into Terrain EGPWS/GPWS Warning N/A (CFIT) (EASp) Altitude Deviation NAV Technical Incident Loss of Control in Flight (EASp) Alpha Protection Airspeed Indication Failure Severe Turbulence N/A Undershoot Alpha Protection Engine Loss of Power EGPWS/GPWS Glide Slope N/A Runway Collision Call Sign Confusion COM Technical Incident Runway/Taxiway Incursion Brakes Failure In Flight Damage/Injuries Bird Strike N/A Severe Turbulence N/A Ground Collision/Damage (EASp) Call Sign Confusion COM Technical Incident Hard Landing with Aircraft Damage Hard/Heavy Landing Engine Loss of Power Tail Strike Pitch High at LDG/TO Mass and Balance Occurrence MxSPIs track the most significant contributing factors for each US Correlation between some US and Mx activities is weak, not enough data (N/A for the moment) We try to have at least one MxSPI for each item under EASp 23
24 MxSPIs: based on Star Alliance WG TAP SPI MAINTENANCE SPI (Safety Performance Indicator) RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT / SYSTEM MNT (MAINTENANCE & ENGINEERING) METRICS ALERT TARGET ME EG/FP COSMOS AIRCRAFT DEFECT RATE (Nº of A/C defects logged by Flt Crew) / XXXX Flight Hours ME MA/MO/TS COSMOS/HIL's OPEN MEL, NARROWBODY Average open MEL items (NB) / day ME MA/MO/TS COSMOS/HIL's OPEN MEL, WIDEBODY Average open MEL items (WB) / day ME MA/MO/TS COSMOS/HIL's MEL, ONE-TIME EXTENSION Nº of MEL receiving a one-time extension ME QL/EG/AE TSO AD EXEEDANCE Nº of Airworthiness Directives exceedances ME QL/EG/AE TSO MR EXEEDANCE Nº of MR exceedances ME N/A N/A MP EXEMPTIONS, NARROW BODY Nº of Maintenance Program exemptions on NB A/C ME N/A N/A MP EXEMPTIONS, WIDE BODY Nº of Maintenance Program exemptions on WB A/C ME LG/GR Aries CANNIBALIZATION Nº of Cannibalizations ME EG/FP COSMOS ENGINE Nº of Engine related failures Incidents / 1000 cycles ME EG/FP COSMOS LANDING GEAR Nº of Gear related failures Incidents / 1000 cycles ME EG/FP COSMOS FLIGHT CONTROLS Nº of Flight control Incidents / 1000 cycles ME EG/FP COSMOS ELETRICAL Nº of Electric related Incidents / 1000 cycles ME EG/FP COSMOS FUEL Nº of Fuel system Incidents / 1000 cycles ME EG/FP COSMOS FIRE / SMOKE Nº of Fire or smoke Incidents / 1000 cycles ME EG/FP COSMOS DUE MAINT. TECH. BREAKDOWN (Nº of Events / Nº of Flight Legs) x 100 ME EG/FP COSMOS ERROR RATE IN MAINTENANCE (Nº of Errors / Nº of tasks) x 100 Most MxSPIs track already known hazards and threats Some MxSPIs result from predictive analysis of possible failure scenarios Due to lack of data, in some cases positive correlation with End States is weak 24
25 MxSPIs: based on TAP M&E Safety Objectives SPI CALCULATION METHOD SOURCE TARGET REVISION 1) Nº Accidents Nº Accidents / Year EG/FP Annual 2) Nº TIR's Nº Open TIRs /Year/Flight Hours EG/FP Annual 2a) Nº ATO Nº Aborted Take Off/Year/TAP Fleet Departures EG/FP Annual 2b) Nº FR Nº Flight Returns/Year/Flight Hours EG/FP Annual 2c) Nº DVF Nº Diverted Flights/Year/Flight Hours EG/FP Annual 2d) Nº FC Nº Flight Cancelations/Year/Departures EG/FP Annual 2e) Nº FOD Nº Foreign Object Damage (Bird Strikes)/Year EG/FP Annual 2f) Nº IFSD Nº In Flight Shut Downs/Year/Flight Hours EG/FP Annual 3) Nº OTH Nº Overweigth Landings/Year/Flight Hours EG/FP Annual 4) Nº RR Nº Ramp Returns/Year/Departures EG/FP Annual 5) Nº Unschedule Nº Unscheduled Removals/Year/Flight Hours EG/FP Annual 5a) Nº Engines Nº Unscheduled Engine Removals EG/FP Quarterly 5b) Nº Units Nº Unscheduled Components Removals EG/FP Quarterly 6) Nº Incidents Nº Incidents in Maintenance Actions/Year All Annual 6a) Nº Emergency Equipments Nº Faults in Emergency Equipments during Scheduled Tests/Year MA/EQ Annual 6b) Nº Unwanted Damages to A/C Nº Unwanted Damages to A/C caused during Maintenance Actions/Year MA/EQ Annual 7) Risk Index Average Risk Level for All Occurrences ME/SO Monthly 8) Nº Reports Nº Reports/Year ME/SO Annual 9) Nº AD Irregularities Nº AD with Irregularities/year QL/EG/AE Annual 10) Nº Claims Nº Claims/Year ME/MV Annual 11) Nº Claims to Service Providers Nº Claims to Service Providers/Year ME/MV Annual 12) Nº Customer Claims Nº Customer Claims/Year ME/MV Annual Some MxSPIs are similar to Star Alliance WG, but the majority reflects strategic objectives of TAP M&E and the application of the Safety Policy 25
26 MxSPIs: based on other requests / recommendations Customers Inspection and maintenance backlog Failures at inspection and testing Training carried out Operator years of experience Process safety critical roles filled Process safety management system audit compliance Overdue audit actions Etc. Airbus Number of deferred items / month Average time and trends to close a MEL item Number of requested extension time for MEL items / month Number of failures for each ATA / flight hour % of repaired equipments with No Fault Found Found (NFF) per repaired equipment Etc. It is not obvious that different Customers would have similar safety requirements (different countries, safety systems, economic and social constraints, etc.) Should an MRO have a fixed set of MxSPIs and provide a standard safety performance package for its works, independent of each Customer s policy? Or should MROs have the flexibility to adapt their MxSPIs to specific safety requirements from different Customers? 26
27 MxSPI Headaches Without enough data, it is not possible to have good SPIs However, too much data may clutter important safety threats The typical operator produces huge amounts of safety data (thousands of flights/year) For MROs it is more difficult and in small MROs even worse less data (ex.) a dozen occurrences, or so (MOR) (ex.) a hundred reports per year, or so (by voluntary incident reporting) How to analyse trends in MRO without enough data? Besides, many MRO reports do not translate into significant safety data (social, SST, administrative, environment, etc.) 27
28 Conclusions Performance measurement: essential to manage Safety Safety continuous improvement: needs reliable SPIs Not enough data weak correlation Too much data information clutter Fewer accidents multiple / random causes Difficult to connect End States with MRO Contributing Factors MROs need to comply with State and Customers objectives MROs need also to track their own Strategic indicators Flexible indicators?? vs. one-size-fits-all package?? 28
29 The Future of SMS at TAP M&E So far so good Let s keep it simple Still work ahead 29
30 Thanks for your attention Jorge Leite TAP Maintenance & Engineering VP Quality 30
Safety Performance Indicators (SPI) Safety Performance Targets (SPT) and Measuring Criteria
Safety Performance Indicators (SPI) Safety Performance Targets (SPT) and Measuring Criteria 29th March, 2017 Jorge Leite VP Quality & Safety TAP Maintenance & Engineering It s great to have reliable Indicators
More informationSafety Performance Measurement -
Safety Performance Measurement - SPI & ALoSP Development (APRAST-6 Workshop) 6 April 215 Teo_Gim_Thong@caas.gov.sg 1 Safety Performance Measurement (SPM): SPIs & ALoSP Development Agenda 1. Definition
More informationEuropean Aviation Safety Agency. Annex C. SSP Phase Implementation Survey Results Draft
European Aviation Safety Agency Annex C SSP Phase Implementation Survey Results 2013 Draft This document provides a summary of the results of the SSP Phase implementation survey by 15 States as part of
More informationSafety Risks in an Airworthiness Organisation
Safety Risks in an Airworthiness Organisation Belinda Swain Chief Airworthiness Engineer Rolls-Royce Plc May 2016 2016 Rolls-Royce plc The information in this document is the property of Rolls-Royce plc
More informationIOsA sms strategy I s s u e d A p r I l
IOSA sms STRATEGY I s s u e d A p r i l 2 0 1 3 Safety & security don t just happen, they are the result of collective consensus and public investment. We owe our children, the most vulnerable citizens
More informationFlight Data Monitoring within an Integrated Safety Management System
Transport Canada Commercial and Business Aviation Flight Data Monitoring within an Integrated Safety Management System CASS 2004 Presentation Overview Historical perspective of safety Overview of SMS SMS
More informationPart-ORA Subparts GEN and ATO
Part-ORA Subparts GEN and ATO Workshop on Reg. 1178/2011 and 290/2012 Lisbon, Portugal 18-19 September 2012 Helena Pietilä Rulemaking officer - FCL Part-ORA Subpart GEN ORA.GEN contains the general provisions
More informationEHSIT/ST meeting Marignane, 27 & 28 October The future EASA rules on Management Systems. Régine Hamelijnck Rulemaking Officer Product Safety
EHSIT/ST meeting Marignane, 27 & 28 October 2011 The future EASA rules on Management Systems Régine Hamelijnck Rulemaking Officer Product Safety History EASA Rulemaking tasks: OPS.001 & FCL.001 started
More informationEuropean Aviation Safety Agency: Management System Assessment Tool. Management System Assessment Tool
Management System Assessment Tool Management System assessment tool v.01 06 September 2017 Present Suitable Operating Effective There is evidence that the feature is documented within the organisation
More informationSAM National continuous monitoring coordinators (NCMC) regional meeting
SAM National continuous monitoring coordinators (NCMC) regional meeting Annex 19 SSP Rollout Page 1 Annex 19 Adopted by the Council on 25 February 2013; Became effective on 15 July 2013; and Became applicable
More informationCANSO Global Approach to Safety. Sam Espig NATS
CANSO Global Approach to Safety Performance Measurement Sam Espig NATS Agenda Measures and targets CANSO Safety Strategy ICAO Aviation Safety Index Slide 2 Why set targets? Provide common direction Motivate
More informationMeasuring Safety Performance
Measuring Safety Performance Presented by: Keboitihetse Fredy Tong Date: 2017/04/04 Safety Performance Measurement (SPM): SPI & ALoSP Development Agenda Definition. Why measure safety performance? Alert
More informationBowTie in Aviation SMS The Message to Management. Bob Dodd Senior Director Risk Management The Aloft Group
BowTie in Aviation SMS The Message to Management Bob Dodd Senior Director Management The Aloft Group Dublin September 2015 + What the CEO Wants What they get the safety deluge Taming the deluge Strategic,
More informationThe Acceptance of Aircraft Components
Leaflet B-110 The Acceptance of Aircraft Components 1 Purpose The purpose of this Leaflet is to provide guidance on the acceptance of aircraft components, so that responsibilities under the applicable
More informationAIRWORTHINESS NOTICE
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE & RELIABILITY PROGRAM OF AN OPERATOR AIRWORTHINESS NOTICE VERSION : 4.0 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION : 26-03-2010 OFFICE OF PRIME INTEREST : AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTORATE
More informationSMS Regulatory Framework
SMS Regulatory Framework NARAST Meeting - Bangkok, 15-17 January 2007 SMS regulatory framework SMS An Overview What is an SMS? A systematic approach to managing safety, including the necessary organizational
More informationCologne,June2017. AnnualActivityReport. AnAgencyoftheEuropeanUnion
Cologne,June2017 AnnualActivityReport AnAgencyoftheEuropeanUnion ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT P a g e 1 Management Board s analysis and assessment MB 2017-01 ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF THE ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT
More informationSMS Training for Investigators. Syllabus
SMS Training for Investigators Syllabus Syllabus SMS Training for Investigators Aviation Quality Services Syllabus SMS Training for Investigators (5 days) Comprehensive competence. Course Plan 1 Day 1...
More information1. Introduction. The core part of the EASA management system framework focuses on the following elements:
EASA survey to RMT.0251 Phase II SMS for EASA Part-21 design organisations, EASA Part-21 production organisations and EASA Part-145 maintenance organisations Fields marked with * are mandatory. 1. Introduction
More informationStrategy and Programmes Dept. MAB meeting, June 2017
EASA/SM 2.1/MAB 2-/02 final MAB agenda as adopted on 2606 Agenda & Schedule Meeting - MAB 2- Date 26 27 June Location DAY 1: Centre A. Borschette, meeting room 5B, Rue Froissart 36, 1040 Bruxelles from
More informationSafety Management International Collaboration Group
Safety Management International Collaboration Group SMS Training, AIRBUS HELICOPTERS approach Patrick PEZZATINI, SMS Corporate risk manager 2015, May 22nd SUMMARY 1 - AH Aviation SMS landscape/organisation
More informationSafety Management Introduction
Safety Management Introduction Eduardo Chacin Regional Officer, Flight Safety ICAO NACC Regional Office Workshop St. Jonhs, Antigua and Barbuda Contents 1. Safety Management Fundamentals 2. ICAO SARPs
More informationICAO Safety Management Workshop May 2015
ICAO Safety Management Workshop 25-27 May 2015 Outline Global & Regional Developments related to Safety Management Legislation to underpin progress at State level Moving forward with SMS. Shaping further
More information7 th APRAST SMS/SSP Workshop Outcome 31 August 2015 Bangkok, Thailand
7 th APRAST SMS/SSP Workshop Outcome 31 August 2015 Bangkok, Thailand SSP/ SMS Implementation Challenges Obstacles Barriers - Needs - Regulatory & Industry perspective Outcome: Lack of Ministerial understanding
More informationNotice of Proposed Amendment Embodiment of Level of Involvement (LOI) requirements into Part-21
European Aviation Safety Agency Notice of Proposed Amendment 2015-03 Embodiment of Level of Involvement (LOI) requirements into Part-21 RMT.0262 (MDM.060) 2.3.2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Notice of Proposed
More informationSMM 3 rd Edition Highlights (Doc 9859, advance version) ICAO-SARO SSP-SMS-RST Meeting
International Civil Aviation Organization SMM 3 rd Edition Highlights (Doc 9859, advance version) ICAO-SARO SSP-SMS-RST Meeting Gim Teo gteo@icao.int Integrated Safety Management (ISM) 14 March 2013 SMM
More informationLima FDA Seminar Presented by Paul DUBOIS AIRBUS - Airline SMS & FDA Assistance ANALYSIS WORKFLOW
Lima FDA Seminar Presented by Paul DUBOIS AIRBUS - Airline SMS & FDA Assistance ANALYSIS WORKFLOW ANALYSIS WORKFLOW Recording Downloading Processing Analysis Page 2 ANALYSIS WORKFLOW FDA Objectives Identify
More informationSafety Management. System. Building an SMS. Module 10 Phased approach to SMS Implementation. Module 8 SMS planning. Module 9 SMS operation
Module N 7 Introduction to SMS Revision N 11 ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course 01/01/08 Building an SMS Safety Management Module 10 Phased approach to SMS Implementation System Module 8 SMS planning
More informationUSFS Safety Management Audit USFS_SMS Heli_Field_Maint_Ver 3_2.xlsx 6/6/2012
USFS Safety Management Audit Version 3.0 Company: 0 N Number: 0 Date: January 0, 1900 Company Rep: 0 Type Acft: 0 Location: 0 Exclusive Use Option Period: 0 Call When Needed HELICOPTER MAINTENANCE, FIELD
More informationCorporate Aviation Safety Management System
Corporate Aviation Safety Management System Prelude Dear aviation colleague, This guide was developed to facilitate the implementation of an effective, yet practical, safety management system (SMS). Although
More informationNZQA registered unit standard version 2 Page 1 of 5. Demonstrate knowledge of safety management systems for an aviation environment
Page 1 of 5 Title Demonstrate knowledge of safety management systems for an aviation environment Level 5 Credits 8 Purpose People credited with this unit standard are, for an aviation environment, able
More informationJAA Administrative & Guidance Material Section Six: Synthetic Training Devices (STD/FSTD), Part Three: Temporary Guidance Leaflet
LEAFLET NO. 9 (rev. 1): ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE ON QUALITY SYSTEMS FOR OPERATORS OF SYNTHETIC TRAINING DEVICES NOTE: The material contained in this Leaflet has been issued in accordance with Chapter 9 of Administrative
More informationCommercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST) Overview
Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST) Overview Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST) CAST Joint Safety Analysis Teams (JSAT) Joint Safety Implementation Teams (JSIT) Industry Government Data-driven accident
More informationSAFETY 1 st SMS DEVELOPMENT GUIDE
SAFETY 1 st SMS DEVELOPMENT GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward... v HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE...1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW... 2 General Introduction to the Safety 1 st Development Guide... 2 Chapter 1: Introduction...
More informationBOEING 1. Copyright 2015 Boeing. All rights reserved.
Maintenance Prognostics Digital solutions to optimize maintenance operations Juan D. Lopez Program Manager, Fleet and Maintenance Solutions September 2015. The statements contained herein are based on
More informationDeclared Training Organisations Future regulations for PPL training. John Wickenden / Justin Willcocks CAA GA Unit March 2017> 1
Declared Training Organisations Future regulations for PPL training John Wickenden / Justin Willcocks CAA GA Unit March 2017> 1 The Current Systems Registered Training Facilities Introduced under JAR-FCL
More informationPractical guide on safety management systems for continuing airworthiness activities
Direction de la sécurité de l Aviation civile Airworthiness Maintenance & Approval Office Issue 1 Rev. 8 March 211 Practical guide on safety management systems for continuing airworthiness activities P-5-11
More informationQUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL
QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL REVISION 1.0 JANUARY 12, 2014 DYESS AVIATION, INC. 2000 W. BEND DR. GEORGETOWN, TX 78626 Dyess Aviation, Inc. Quality Assurance Manual Policy & Procedures Quality Management Introduction:
More informationGo Around Decision Making
Bill Curtis Project Co-Chair I acknowledge receipt of your message and attached file. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Go Around Decision Making FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION 1 The Issue Ineffective Go-Around
More informationChris Sorensen Photography. Twelve steps to implementing a safety management system. BY JOHN SHEEHAN. SMS Tools for Corporate Aviation
@ Chris Sorensen Photography Twelve steps to implementing a safety management system. BY JOHN SHEEHAN SMS Tools for Corporate Aviation 32 flight safety foundation AeroSafetyWorld September 2010 Now that
More informationData Mining in MRO process optimisation
Mining in MRO process optimisation Maurice Pelt Aviation Academy, Amsterdam University of Applied Science m.m.j.m.pelt@hva.nl RAeS Conference, London, 5 September 2017 Increasing Efficiency & Reducing
More informationAppendix B Maintenance Control Manual Template
Appendix B Maintenance Control Manual Template MAINTENANCE CONTROL MANUAL TELATE OTAR PART 39 SUBPART E OPTION ONE AND TWO The purpose of this Maintenance Control Manual (MCM) Guidance Document is to assist
More informationAirline Reliability Program & SMS Reactive to Predictive
Airline Reliability Program & SMS Reactive to Predictive IATA Maintenance Symposium Miami September 2015 Darren Cook Manager Quality & Safety Maintenance Operations & Part 145 QANTAS Engineering Getting
More informationSMS SCALABILITY FOR SMALLER AIRLINES
FOR SMALLER AIRLINES FLEET: 5 Boeing 737-400 1 Embraer 175 1 Dornier 328 FLAIR Airlines (Air Operator Certificate in 2005) Domestic and non-scheduled international service Charter Airline based in Kelowna,
More informationThe SMS Table. Kent V. Hollinger. December 29, 2006
The SMS Table Kent V. Hollinger December 29, 2006 This presentation introduces the concepts contained in a Safety Management System (SMS) by using the analogy of an SMS being a four-legged glass-top table,
More informationCOMMISSION REGULATION (EU)
L 320/8 Official Journal of the European Union 17.11.2012 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1078/2012 of 16 November 2012 on a common safety method for monitoring to be applied by railway undertakings, infrastructure
More informationLAMP Line Activity Monitoring Program A look at PHI s Non FAA Approved Helicopter Flight Data Monitoring (HFDM) Program
LAMP Line Activity Monitoring Program A look at PHI s Non FAA Approved Helicopter Flight Data Monitoring (HFDM) Program Objectives Provide an overview of an active FDM program Provide insight into the
More informationSafety Management System (SMS)
14 th Annual Risk Management Conference Concurrent Session 2a Safety Management System (SMS) A Comprehensive Approach Cynthia Schultz PE, AAE Vice President, Airports cschultz@jdasolutions.aero 406-788-7667
More informationPractical Crew Resource Management (CRM) Standards: The Handy Guide
Practical Crew Resource Management (CRM) Standards: The Handy Guide This guide is a standardisation tool, developed by the Flight Crew Human Factors Advisory Panel (FCHF), to help National Aviation Authority
More informationIt is a great pleasure and honour to be here today and to have the opportunity to address you!
Ladies and Gentlemen, dear Friends, It is a great pleasure and honour to be here today and to have the opportunity to address you! This year we are celebrating the 25 th years of EU aviation internal market.
More informationAcceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and. Guidance Material (GM) to Part-ATS
European Aviation Safety Agency Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material (GM) to Part-ATS Specific requirements for providers of air traffic services (ATS) Initial Issue 8 March 2017
More informationSMS Implementation. Strategic Plan for Upgrading ISAGO SMS Provisions
SMS Implementation Strategic Plan for Upgrading ISAGO SMS Provisions Effective March 2016 Table of Contents Message from Senior Vice President... 1 Background... 2 ISAGO SMS Provisions... 3 Governance...
More informationDevelopment of Competency Based Training in Europe
EATS Oct 2014 Development of Competency Based Training in Europe Thomas Leoff Presentation Outline 1. Setting the scene: global training challenges and ICAO s and IATA s requirement for competency based
More informationBird Strike Risk Analysis ACRP Report 125 ACI Fri, 1/13/17. Paul Esposito, CIH, CSP STAR Consultants, Inc.
Bird Strike Risk Analysis ACRP Report 125 ACI Fri, 1/13/17 Paul Esposito, CIH, CSP STAR Consultants, Inc. Paul.esposito@starconsultants.net STAR > Overview STAR has been in business since 1997 Safety Through
More informationPost-ops performance adjustment process
Post-ops performance adjustment process 1 Introduction Background Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 390/2013 (Performance regulation) and associated Commission Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU setting
More informationU.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. Aviation Safety Policy. Aviation Safety (AVS) Safety Management System Requirements
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Aviation Safety Policy ORDER VS 8000.367 A Effective Date: 11130/2012 SUBJ: Aviation Safety (AVS) Safety Management System Requirements
More informationASA ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2014 WASHINGTON, DC THE 8D DISCIPLINE TO EFFECTIVE PROBLEM SOLVING
1 ASA ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2014 WASHINGTON, DC THE 8D DISCIPLINE TO EFFECTIVE PROBLEM SOLVING G. RINGGER CONSULTING, INC. Celebrating 30 years in the aerospace/aviation industry! Providing Engineering, Quality
More informationCIVIL AVIATION PUBLICATION CAP 15 SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
CAP 15 SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS This Page Intentionally Left Blank CAP 15 SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INDEX Section Title Page. 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 Definitions... 1 1.2 General... 2 1.3 Introduction
More informationFederal Aviation Administration FAA Updates & Perspectives
FAA Updates & Perspectives Presented to: By: Rusty Jones AIR-600 Date: Why are we here? Information Sharing; Reorganizations ICA Issues ASAP Program I learn from you!! Where do we focus our energies (limited
More informationMaintenance Cost Management or Value Management
Maintenance Cost Management or Value Management 10th Annual Managing Aircraft Maintenance Costs Conference Lisbon, November 25 th, 2009 Welcome! Agenda The relationship between a MRO provider and an airline
More informationCIVIL AVIATION REQUIREMENTS SECTION 6 DESIGN STANDARDS & TYPE CERTIFICATION SERIES 'B', PART II
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TECHNICAL CENTRE, OPPOSITE SAFDRJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI CIVIL AVIATION REQUIREMENTS SECTION 6 DESIGN STANDARDS & TYPE CERTIFICATION
More informationFAA/HSAC PART 135 SYSTEM SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT SAFETY ELEMENT REQUIRED INSPECTION ITEMS (RII) JOB AID
SAFETY ELEMENT 1.3.4 REQUIRED INSPECTION ITEMS (RII) JOB AID The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is proactively moving away from compliance based safety surveillance programs to Systems Safety Risk
More informationJAA Administrative & Guidance Material Section Two: Maintenance Part Three: Temporary Guidance Leaflets
LEAFLET No.15: JAR-OPS 1&3 SUBPART M CONTRACTED MAINTENANCE TO A JAR-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATION 1. Note. The material contained in the leaflet has been issued in accordance with Chapter 11 of
More informationPromoting a safety culture in maintenance
Safety is of paramount importance in high risk industries, the concept of safety culture is of growing importance in these industries as a means of reducing the potential for large-scale disasters, and
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Draft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, C Draft COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No / of [ ] amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 1702/2003 laying down implementing rules for the airworthiness
More informationAcceptable Level of Safety Performance (ALoSP) implementation in EUROCONTROL Member States
EUROCONTROL Acceptable Level of Safety Performance (ALoSP) implementation in EUROCONTROL Member States Report commissioned by the Performance Review Commission June 2017 Background This report has been
More information05/14/2008 VS
Table of Contents Chapter 1. General Information... 4 1. Purpose of This Order... 4 2. Audience.... 4 3. Where Can I Find This Order... 4 4. Scope... 4 Chapter 2. Policy... 5 1. General Requirements....
More informationAerodrome Safety Awareness
Aerodrome Safety Awareness Platzhalterbild 1/1 Breite Daniel Bircher Safety Officer Operations Zurich Airport 01.10.2010 Contents 1. Background 2. Legal Basis 3. User Requirements 4. Safety Awareness Concept
More informationNPA No NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT (NPA) No 22/2005 DRAFT DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE AGENCY
NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT (NPA) No 22/2005 DRAFT DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE AGENCY AMENDING DECISION NO. 2003/19/RM OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE AGENCY of 28 November 2003 on acceptable
More informationCHARTER. United States Helicopter Safety Team
CHARTER United States Helicopter Safety Team 1 Charter for the United States Helicopter Safety Team Rev 2.0 August 2015 Purpose The purpose of this United States Helicopter Safety Team (USHST) charter
More informationSafety in Aircraft Maintenance
Safety in Aircraft Maintenance Train the Person to Avoid the Error They Never Intend to Make Presented for Flight Safety Foundation Corporate Aviation Safety Seminar Tucson, Arizona May 2010 Presented
More informationOpinion No 11/2016. Training outside approved training organisations
European Aviation Safety Agency Opinion No 11/2016 Training outside approved training organisations RELATED NPA: 2015-20 1 RMT.0657 7.9.2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Opinion addresses a proportionality issue
More informationERM and SMS Working Together in Harmony
ERM and SMS Working Together in Harmony Mike Smith CAA & Operations Auditing Lisanne Sison Director and Practice Leader, Risk Management Consulting Agenda I. Overview of SMS II. Overview of ERM III. Review
More informationThe goal of the Flight Operations Risk Assessment System (FORAS)
Flight Operations Risk Assessment System (FORAS) Michael Hadjimichael John McCarthy Naval Research Laboratory 1 Olga Fridman Science Applications International Corporation 2 Abstract The goal of the Flight
More informationForeign Part-145 approvals - Documentary language UG.CAO
- Documentary language Name Validation Date Prepared by: Marc GRAGNOLI Validated 21/10/2015 Verified by: Karl SPECHT Validated 22/10/2015 Reviewed by: Dominique PERRON Validated 22/10/2015 Approved by:
More informationCASE STUDY TWO IMPLEMENTING A SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INDUSTRY CASE STUDIES OCEANIA AVIATION GROUP
CASE STUDY TWO IMPLEMENTING A SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INDUSTRY CASE STUDIES OCEANIA AVIATION GROUP Civil AVIATION AuthORITY of New Zealand IMPLEMENTING A SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INDUSTRY CASE STUDIES
More informationThe new EU Fatigue Management Regulation Key Issues
The new EU Fatigue Management Regulation Key Issues Implementation Workshop Air Ops Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 Warsaw, 15-16 May 2014 Content Implementation Flight time specification schemes FDP at night
More informationApplying PSM to Process Measurement
Applying PSM to Process Measurement Name: Bill Golaz Title: LM Fellow & LM Aero Measurement and Analysis Lead PSM All rights reserved. Copyright 2010 1 Topics Why Measure Why Process Measurement Using
More informationJustification? ICAO Annex 13, Chapter 8.6
safe transport Aviation research Justification? ICAO Annex 13, Chapter 8.6 A State having established an accident and incident database and an incident reporting system shall analyse the information contained
More informationSafety Management Systems See also the OTAC 'Documenting the SMS'
United Kingdom Overseas Territories Aviation Circular Safety Management Systems See also the OTAC 'Documenting the SMS' OTAC 119-3 125-1 139-2 140-2 145-7 171-2 172-4 173-2 176-3 Issue 3 24 June 2009 Effective:
More informationFederal Aviation Administration Safety Management System Manual
Federal Aviation Administration Safety Management System Manual Policy Architecture Assurance Safety Promotion Version 1.1 May 21, 2004 Table of Contents Foreword... i Introduction to the Safety Management
More informationContextual note SESAR Solution description form for deployment planning
Purpose: Release 5 SESAR Solution #101 Contextual note SESAR Solution description form for deployment planning This contextual note introduces a SESAR Solution (for which maturity has been assessed as
More informationCorporate Quality, Health, Safety and Environment Plan
Corporate Quality, Health, Safety and Environment Plan 2014 Document No: Revision: 0 Issue Date: 18 December 2013 1. MESSAGE FROM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER To All Songa Offshore Employees, 2013 was good
More informationIntroduction to Safety Management Systems. elearning
Introduction to Safety Management Systems elearning Redefine your skills Advance your career in the aviation industry Course Description: The purpose of this course is to provide learners with an understanding
More informationRegulatory and Operational Hot Topics Part 1. CBAA Convention August 11, 2017
Regulatory and Operational Hot Topics Part 1 CBAA Convention August 11, 2017 Practical Guide to Applying Regulations Some Basic Rules of Interpretation & General Principles. 2 Practical Guide to Applying
More informationGuidelines for Development of Civil Aircraft and Systems. Introduction to ARP4754A
Guidelines for Development of Civil Aircraft and Systems Introduction to ARP4754A 23 July, 2014 Avionics Systems Evolution DO-178 ARP4754 ARP4761 DO-254 ARP4754A Early Aviation: mainly mechanical equipment
More informationRP3 ATCEUC position paper
"[air navigation control, [ ] is a task involving the exercise of public authority and is not of an economic nature, since that activity constitutes a service in the public interest which is intended to
More informationAircraft Manufacturing Organisations Certification
Civil Aviation Rules Part 148, Amendment 4 Docket 8/CAR/1 Contents Rule objective... 3 Extent of consultation... 3 Summary of submissions... 3 Examination of submissions... 4 Insertion of Amendments...
More informationEvent Analysis Using Maintenance Error Decision Aid (MEDA) and Procedural Event Analysis Tool (PEAT)
Event Analysis Using Maintenance Error Decision Aid (MEDA) and Procedural Event Analysis Tool (PEAT) William L. Rankin Steven P. Kimball, Mike Moodi, Steven L. Sogg Human Factors Boeing Commercial Aviation
More informationHuman Factor in Functional Safety
1. Introduction Human Factor in Functional Safety Pasquale Fanelli Invensys Systems Italia S.p.A. v. Carducci, 125 20099 Sesto S.G. (MI) pasquale. fanelli @invensys.com The European Norm EN 61508 "Functional
More informationUSOAP CMA: Objectives and Activities in Evolution
USOAP CMA: Objectives and Activities in Evolution Nicolas Rallo Chief, Safety and Air Navigation Oversight Audit Section Some acronyms USOAP : Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme of ICAO (launched
More informationArbitrary Escalation Caps (AES)
White Paper By Ed Adams, Senior Consultant and Dave Nakata, VP Consulting Services Operator maintenance program escalation proposals of greater than ten percent often elicit grave reservations from a variety
More informationNAS-Wide Performance: Impact of Select Uncertainty Factors and Implications for Experimental Design
Approved for Public Release: 12-0370. Distribution Unlimited. NAS-Wide Performance: Impact of Select Uncertainty Factors and Implications for Experimental Design Gareth O. Coville, MITRE Corporation Billy
More informationCargo Operations & Handling. Excellence in Air Cargo Handling & Fast Cargo
Cargo Operations & Handling Excellence in Air Cargo Handling & Fast Cargo IATA Competition Law Compliance Chairman s Welcome DeviPrasad Rambhatla Vice President & Global Head Travel Transportation and
More informationAviation Legislation. Credit value: 10 Guided learning hours: 60. Aim and purpose. Unit introduction. Learning outcomes
Unit 78: Aviation Legislation Unit code: QCF Level 3: Credit value: 10 Guided learning hours: 60 Aim and purpose H/600/7245 BTEC Nationals This unit gives learners an understanding of the legislation and
More informationSECTION QUALITY REQUIREMENTS
SECTION 014000 - PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Defines SRP requirements for Contractor Quality Control and Owner Quality Assurance. As an Electric and Water Utility, SRP has many critical facilities.
More information