EcoServ-GIS. Ecosystem Services Mapping: A Wildlife Trust GIS Toolkit to map ecosystem services at a county scale

Similar documents
MAES Delivery Workshop Using Ecosystem Services Mapping to Target Habitat Improvements

EcoCo Life Project. Practical application of models, maps and matrices

Agriculture and the Environment IX, Valuing Ecosystems: Policy, Economic and Management Interactions (2012)

Locally selected Nature Improvement Areas

Synthesis of Key Findings. The Foundation for Science and Technology at The Royal Society 13 July NEA Main Features

Some Methods and Approached to Valuing Ecosystem Services, Peter Glaves and Dave Egan (March 2013)

As one of our greatest assets there is a need to take collective action to protect, enhance and value our environment for now and for future

Tools to inform delivery of net gain in Natural Capital. Cranfield University, 30 October 2017 Alison Smith

Ecosystems accounting in the UK

InVEST: A Tool to Map, Measure and Value Nature's Benefits

Central Bedfordshire - Natural Capital in Planning

2. How do you define ecosystem services? What do you see as the relationship between ecosystem services and biodiversity?

The ecosystem service approach to make protection goals operational. Lorraine Maltby

Tresham Garden Village: A natural capital impact assessment

Ecosystem Services Identification, Valuation & Integration (ESIVI) Strategic Sustainability and Climate Change Team, London

IEEM 2011 Annual Conference: Rebuilding Biodiversity

Services Supply Account (Levels 1 and 2)

Hesketh Out Marsh East Managed Realignment

National and Global Ecosystem Assessments. Dr Mike Christie

Natural Capital. 1. Introduction. APSE briefing 15-29

Benefits of SSSIs in England and Wales

Response to Defra s consultation: Health and Harmony: the future for food, farming and the environment in a Green Brexit. The Wildlife Trusts

05/05/2015 European Investment Bank Group 1

Statement of Particulars Western Wales Flood Risk Management Plan

Agroecology Ecological understanding of farming systems 4. Ecosystem services

Using Ecosystem Services Frameworks to Increase Forest Value and Enhance Forest Health

The EU's Green Infrastructure Strategy

Valuing the Humber s Natural Capital using a Participatory Mapping Approach

Natural capital. Ecosystem services

Area Statements May update

Opportunities for the Private Forestry Sector. Niel Nicholson

Identifying Priorities for the Health & Wellbeing Funding Call: Web Survey Summary

Scottish Borders Land Use Strategy pilot regional land use framework

Realising nature s value in infrastructure: Yorkshire Water and National Grid

Landscape opportunity and ecosystem services mapping in the South West Peak

DRAFT FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE APRIL 27, 2006 MEETING OF NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE OF THE HIGHLANDS COUNCIL

Outline. Scion Forestry Ecosystem Services Forum, 8 May 2018 From Data to Decisions: a Regional Council Perspective

Mainstreaming ecosystem service accounting into conservation policy in China

Nugen s Environmental Credentials. Paula Madill Head of Environment

Biodiversity and climate change, developing resilience in upland environments. Ian Crosher March 2015

Wetland Ecosystem Services- Experience of The UK National Ecosystem Assessment. Edward Maltby Laborde Endowed Chair in Research Innovation, LSU

Miguel Pérez Quesada

Valuing Nature: Incorporating Ecosystem Services Into Decision Making. Steve Polasky University of Minnesota & Natural Capital Project

Session 3: What is Ecosystem- based Disaster Risk Reduction (Eco-DRR)?

Generating Knowledge on Ecosystem Services in the Hindu Kush Himalayas

Measuring and Valuing Natural Assets: Ecosystem Services. Steve Polasky University of Minnesota & Natural Capital Project

Weathering the Storm: Wetlands and Food Attenuation in Ontario. Natural Adaptation to a Changing Climate

Services Generation Account (Levels 0, 1 and 2)

Bedfordshire and Luton Habitat Action Plan: Arable Margins

What is the ecological evidence for a link between biodiversity and ecosystem services? James Bullock & Phil Martin Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

Transport for the North

SW E N. South West Environment Network 2010 Environment Priorities

BIODIVERSITY AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDANCE FOR HAMPSHIRE

The Wildlife Trusts Biodiversity Benchmark Requirements

An Eco-metric Approach to Growing Natural Capital. Alison Smith, ECI, University of Oxford CIWEM Environmental Net Gain Conference 30 October 2018

Environmental Assessment in Regional Planning

Welcome and Introduction

September 2016 ID Competency Statement Type

Rebuilding Nature in the Biosphere Reserve: North Devon UNESCO World Biosphere Reserve Offsetting Strategy

Ecosystem Service Valuation Tools for Floodplains. Mark Healy

Ecosystem Services in the Greater Houston Region. A case study analysis and recommendations for policy initiatives

Supply of ecosystem services

Valuing nature s benefits for humans

Ecosystem Services and Agriculture. Entomology 2010 December, 2010

EU Biodiversity Strategy to th Concawe Symposium

Introduction Rob Bugter. Effectiveness Pekka Jokinen

What are biodiversity targets?

Natural Capital Accounting

Use of CORINE Land Cover in delivering the EEA strategy

GC001: Lambert s Transport/Europa Tyres, Station Road, Gosberton Risegate

Measuring UK Woodland Ecosystem Assets and Ecosystem Services

Functions and values of water. Cor de Jong WaterLand International, Wageningen

The Quest to Make Conservation Profitable

Bedfordshire and Luton Habitat Action Plan: Arable Margins

Valuing Nature Today as an Investment in Trinidad and Tobago s Future

Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan. Sustainability Appraisal Report Non-technical summary

NATURAL CAPITAL IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

Forest Stewardship Spatial Analysis Project Illinois Methodology March, 2007

Predicting Wildlife Site Sensitivity to Visitor Pressure. Planning & Biodiversity Conference Møller Centre, Cambridge April 14, 2011

Gatineau Park: The Capital s Natural Jewel. Presented by Christie Spence Canadian Institute of Forestry AGM Ottawa, September 28, 2017

Valuing Ecosystem Services: InVEST Tools. Adrian L. Vogl, Ph.D. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University

Overview of the Trade and Biodiversity Reference Manual. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre

The 2017 Tree Charter: A response from the Legal Sustainability Alliance

contribution of SWAT modelling to integrated land use governance

TAC CHARRETTE WORKBOOK Ecosystem Management and Sustainable Forestry Practices

Alley Cropping. An Introduction to incorporating long-term tree crops and short-term farm crops

In the Environment Court of New Zealand Christchurch Registry ENV-2016-CHC- Henley Downs Land Holdings Limited. Appellant. Otago Regional Council

THE MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT

The South Atlantic Third Thursday Web Forum

Babergh & Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan: Sustainability Appraisal. August 2017

Warwickshire Avon Catchment Partnership

Let s Talk Wetland Benefits. Jane Ballard Maine Water and Sustainability Conference March

Valuation of biodiversity and associated ecosystem services

Can REDD+ contribute to ecological functions, ecosystem services and livelihoods beyond carbon?

Dr. Rebecca J. Allee 1 and Dr. Kelly A. Burks-Copes 2

Economic Value of Ecosystem Services Provided by Agricultural Lands

Prioritizing Local Action. Strengthening the Resilience of the Taunton River Watershed

New Jersey Forest Stewardship Program Spatial Analysis Project Map Products And Data Layers Descriptions

Planning for environmental change. Prof Alister Scott BA PhD MRTPI

Free Bridge Congestion Relief Project: Using FHWA s Eco-Logical Process

Transcription:

EcoServ-GIS Ecosystem Services Mapping: A Wildlife Trust GIS Toolkit to map ecosystem services at a county scale Dr Jonathan Winn Living Landscape Coordinator Durham Wildlife Trust

EcoServ-GIS A Sussex case study Ecosystem Services Mapping: A Wildlife Trust GIS Toolkit to map ecosystem services at a county scale Henri Brocklebank Strategy Lead Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre

Why EcoServ GIS? EcoServ-GIS has been funded by RSWT Strategic Development Fund / Dame Mary Smieton Fund Mapping Ecosystem service to implement the Ecosystem approach Mapping takes time, but can be automated cost savings Include non-designated sites / general countryside Local planning and Green Infrastructure context

Many studies different scales Policy focussed / broad scope

Much existing research, literature, reports and methods...but Local authority and conservation staff need a toolkit to help them implement the ecosystem approach; mapping is a good way to do this

How the toolkit works Many mapping methods have been tried and tested: Simple; quick & easy to implement & interpret Habitat service matrix Mathematical/empirical models Detailed, complex, data intensive

How the toolkit works Many mapping methods have been tried and tested: Not detailed enough for local scale decision Simple; making? quick & easy to implement & interpret Habitat service matrix EcoServ-GIS Mathematical/empirical models Detailed, complex, data intensive Data & time constraints

Which services? Categories Ecosystem service (12) Sub-category (24) Provisioning Nutrition Food provision Water supply/availability Materials Timber Regulating Cultural Climate (biophysical) regulation Carbon storage Local climate regulation Flows / hazard regulation Noise regulation Wave attenuation Water flow regulation Erosion regulation Purification/waste regulation Water purification Air purification Biotic environment regulation Pollination Biological control Wild species diversity Wildlife watching Wildlife corridors Inspiration/symbolic Aesthetic quality /spiritual Spiritual places Culture and community Community cohesion/integration Heritage and cultural identify Environmental settings and local Accessible nature experience places Outdoor recreation spaces Green travel corridors Information, knowledge, employment Education / knowledge opportunities

Which services? Stage I Wildlife watching Accessible nature Education opportunities Carbon storage Local climate regulation Water purification Pollination Noise regulation Food Timber

Which services Stage II (TBC) Community cohesion Erosion regulation Water flow regulation (flood control) Aesthetic quality Heritage and cultural identity

Automating ecosystem service mapping ArcGIS Modelbuilder Widely accessible data User guide produced Transparent Transferable Standardised Repeatable Accessible Easily updated & applied to further analysis

Pilot region Durham Biodiversity Action Plan Area A large area (~3,000 km 2 ) Multiple local authorities

Methods: selecting service indicators 1) Ecosystem service capacity: The performance and capability of an ecosystem or a landscape to deliver services 2) Service demand areas: Areas where there is societal demand for a service and/or the need for ecological regulation 3) Service delivery areas: Functioning ecosystems graded according to a combination of their capacity to deliver a service and the societal and ecological demand for the service Select indices and spatial scales based on current scientific research, and data availability and transferability.

Presentation health warning We do not yet have the documentation that explains the thinking behind each model, only the technical documentation.

Example: Accessible nature experience DEMAND INDICES 1) Population density measured at 300 m and 3.2 km

Example: Accessible nature experience DEMAND INDICES 2) Index of Multiple Deprivation health scores measured at 300 m and 3.2 km

Example: Accessible nature experience Sum of demand indices

Example: Accessible nature experience CAPACITY INDICES 1) Perceived naturalness of habitats within 50 m and 1 km

Combine Demand with Capacity to show service flow Capacity

Accessible nature - Derived output

Multi-functionality

What will EcoServ-GIS be used for, and by who? Landscape-scale Conservation: LNPs BAP HLF Toolkit run and used by partnerships of: Wildlife Trusts Local authorities Local record centres PSMA allows OS data to be sourced and shared between organisations (Local authorities, Environment Agency etc)

What will EcoServ-GIS be used for? Shows where there is particular need for certain services E.g. water purification shows where extra wetlands, reedbeds, woodland would help Accessible nature - shows where is need for more greenspace Shows where areas are already performing services well

These projects can improve multiple services and improve conditions for wildlife... BUT... There will be a trade-off between some services e.g. timber and accessible nature

Current work User Guide to explain how to use the maps Working with Partner Wildlife Trusts across England (Somerset, Sussex, Northamptonshire) Adding in more mapped services Working on planning application scenarios

EcoServ-GIS A Sussex case study

40 data sets required For comparison Durham = 278,108 ha / 2,781 km2 Sussex area = 455,000 ha / 4,550 km2 Sussex area plus 5km buffer = 678,000 ha / 6,780 km2

Which services? Stage I Wildlife watching Accessible nature Education opportunities Carbon storage Local climate regulation Water purification Pollination Noise regulation Food Timber Which services Stage II (TBC) Community cohesion Erosion regulation Water flow regulation (flood control) Aesthetic quality Heritage and cultural identity

Food provision Timber Provision Water availability Biomass energy Climate regulation Regulating water quality Regulating water flow Regulating coastal flooding and erosion Regulating soil quality Regulating soil erosion Pollination Pest regulation A sense of place/inspiration Sense of History Tranquillity Recreation Biodiversity Geodiversity