General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Luxembourg

Similar documents
General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the La Réunion region

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Lithuania

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Slovenia

Rural Development Programme (RDP) of Azores, Portugal. General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the Azores region

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the Madeira region

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the Puglia region

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Niedersachsen and Bremen

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the Balearic islands

Rural Development Programmes

Guidance note D Hierarchy of Objectives

Rural Development Programmes

Rural Development Programme (RDP) of Hexagone, France Le Programme de Développement Rural Hexagone 1 (Hexagone Rural Development Programme)

Rural Development Programmes

New Hungary Rural Development Strategic Plan

European Rural Development Policy and Mountain Regions

Implementation of the Lithuanian Rural Development Programme for

The rural development policy : future skills needs in the agrifood

Rural Development Program of Region Veneto. AGRI E.I.4, Bruxelles, September 2007

Guidance note B Evaluation guidelines

Synthesis of ex-post evaluations of Rural Development Programmes Presentation of the synthesis

Implementation of the Lithuanian Rural Development Programme for

Rural Development

EU Rural Development Policy: Architecture and Implementation

Factsheet on Rural Development Programme for Latvia

SUMMARY objective evaluation relevance financial effectiveness

ROMANIA. (The text of this summary sheet was finalised in September 2010 in accordance with the version of the RDP that was current at this time)

Sowing opportunities to reap the fruits of development.

Fact Sheet. O v e r v i e w o f t h e C A P H e a l t h C h e c k and the European Economic Recovery Plan Modification of the RDPs

Guidance note I Result Indicator Fiches

Climate Change and Renewable Energy issues in RDP

COMPROMISE AMENDMENTS 1-37

Session 3: Land consolidation and EU rural development policies - an overview

Rural Development. and EIP AGRI

POLAND Agriculture Policies and programmes to achieve food security and sustainable agriculture

RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (RDP) OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Integration of Environmental and Climate Policy into the RDP

MEMO/11/685. CAP Reform an explanation of the main elements. 1.Direct Payments. Brussels, 12 October 2011

Giving a new boost to a unique land

Wawrzyniec Czubak

FRANCE MIDI-PYRÉNÉES

Monitoring and Evaluation for RDPs Comments from Greece

University of National and World Economy

P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 Needs to be monitored and reported by priority and focus area 2a 2b 3a 3b a b c 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e 6a 6b 6c

Content. EU funding for nature conservation

Climate Change and Renewable Energy issues in RDP

ASSESSING EU POLICY IMPACTS ON THE MULTIFUNCTIONAL CHARACTERS OF RURAL AREAS

Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca y Desarrollo. Rural

EU COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY IN RELATION TO THE LANDSCAPE

Average farm size ha UAA/holding (3) 4.0. Planned total public expenditure: EUR

Implications of climate and energy policy on the agricultural and forestry sectors

Average farm size ha UAA/holding (3) 4.0. Planned total public expenditure: EUR

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 6 September /13 Interinstitutional File: 2011/0282 (COD) AGRI 540 AGRISTR 94 CODEC 1952

Rural development toolbox for Natura 2000

EU forest-related policy framework. Marius Lazdinis Unit Bioenergy, biomass, forestry, and climate change, DG Agriculture and Rural Development

Target indicator fiches for Pillar II (Priorities 1 to 6)

Building Partnerships for Technology Generation, Assessment and Sharing in Agriculture among West Balkan Countries

QUESTIONS FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES JUNE 2015 WORKING DOCUMENT COMMON EVALUATION QUESTIONS FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT MARCH 2015

State of play of CAP measure Agri-environment payments in the European Union

European Rural Development Policy. Possibilities for Social Farming? By Johan Verstrynge Department of Agriculture and Fisheries

BULGARIAN RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

Bilbao, Basque country, (Spain), October 2014

Average farm size ha UAA/holding (3) 4.7. Planned total public expenditure: EUR

Forestry (green infrastructure and ecosystem services) in Rural Development Policy post 2013 period

Rural Development Policy

Rural Development Programmes

DG AGRI D.1-Transparency/ Working Document Rev6 Ares(2018) /04/2018 DESCRIPTION OF MEASURES

Financial instruments in rural development : programming and policy elements

Contribution of the EU agricultural policy to climate change mitigation

The CAP towards Implementation of Rural Development Policy. State of Play of RDPs

Schema interventi rilevanti per Priorità e Focus Area

CLLD Cooperation OFFER

Agricultural Policy Developments in Bulgaria

NATIONAL RURAL NETWORK RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME GREECE MAY 2010

The Common Agricultural Policy State of play

CLLD Cooperation OFFER

Opportunities within the Rural Development Policy

Midterm evaluation of the Swedish Rural Development Programme

A new policy framework for a more sustainable EU agriculture. Pierre Bascou DG Agriculture and rural development European commission

S P A I N COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY

Position Paper for Germany

ENRD CONNECTING RURAL EUROPE

Regione Marche. Development Programme Non techincal summary. Roma, June 2015

The Organic Research Centre CAP Reform and Organic Farming - the legislative proposals

Research Institute of Agricultural Economics Committee on Agricultural Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Study on Employment, Growth and Innovation in Rural Areas (SEGIRA)

2. Intervention logic 2.1 The intervention logic of rural development policy in

LEADER local development

THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME A SUMMARY

EU Agri-Environmental indicators and the Rural Development CMEF indicators (Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework): a coherent system of analysis

Knowledge transfer and information actions

Rural development and multifunctional agriculture in Bulgaria 2

A Better Life in Rural Areas

The EU's Rural Development Policy in the period

European Union Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

Estonian case study Evaluation of agri-environment schemes biodiversity objective

RURAL DEVELOPMENT MONITORING ( ) IMPLEMENTATION REPORT TABLES

Working document. Complementary Result Indicator fiches for Pillar II

Social economic developments in rural Europe

SYNTHESIS OF EX ANTE EVALUATIONS OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES

COMMON EVALUATION QUESTIONS FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES WORKING DOCUMENT ASSESSMENT OF RDP RESULTS: HOW

Transcription:

Rural Development Programme (RDP) of Luxembourg Programme de développement rural du G.-D. de Luxembourg (2007-2013 1 (Rural Development Programme 2007-2013: for a long term sustainable rural development) Relevant Contact Details Address: Service du développement rural- Ministère de l agriculture de la viticulture et du développement rural- 1, rue de la Congrégation L-1352, Luxembourg Telephone number: + 352 2478 2478 Managing Authority Website: Map of Luxembourg http://www.ma.public.lu ( European Commission) Other useful links: Rural Development Programme (RDP): http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/country-information/programming/en/programming_home_en.cfm National Strategy Plan (NSP): http://www.ma.public.lu/aides_financieres/aides_communautaires/aides_rural/index.html Luxembourg National Rural Network (NRN): http://www.ma.public.lu/aides_financieres/aides_communautaires/reseau_rural/index.html General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Luxembourg Luxembourg has a population of around 500,000, covering a territory of 2,586 km 2. Located in central Europe (Lat: 49º36 Long: 6º07 ) it is a small country bordering France on the west, Belgium on the north and Germany on the east. GDP per capita is almost three times higher than the EU-27 (one the richest countries in the world) and has the lowest European unemployment rate of 4.2%. Luxembourg rural areas cover more than 92% of its territory. They are characterized by a high diversity of landscapes. Since 1989, the Luxembourg government has been pursuing an integrated development policy of rural areas beyond the single dimension of agriculture, in accordance with the 1997 European model of multifunctional agriculture and in a global perspective of sustainable rural development and support. The availability of public infrastructure, accessibility to schools, culture, sports and leisure activities are not uniform between rural and urban areas. The share of agriculture and viticulture in the rural economy and in the job market is decreasing. Rural areas are facing serious problems of rural urbanisation (endangering agriculture survival) and the demand for labour in the secondary sector (industry, SMEs, energy and construction) has also declined. However, the service sector (businesses, financial, public sectors, business services), clearly focuses on urban centres, and continues to expand in the capital. RDP strategic objectives The overall objective of the 2009 RDP revision in Luxembourg is to coordinate with the National Strategy Plan and allocate the additional funds to the restructuring of the dairy sector. Specifically, the RDP contributes to a more harmonious development of rural areas so that the various economic sectors can coexist by reinforcing farmers' professional skills, modernising holdings that contribute 1 The text of this version of the programme has been revised in April 2010. 1

towards improving agriculture competitiveness, and developing quality products targeting export markets. It also aims to maintain agriculture at risk of disappearing and to promote farming practices compatible with environmental requirements. Opportunities to diversify the rural economy will be encouraged and rural actors will play an active role in the local strategies. Following the CAP Health Check, and in recognition that the National Strategy Plan already anticipated much of the new strategic objectives, the 2009 RDP revision did not bring many modifications to the original document. Therefore, the revised RDP further supports activities to help the restructuring of the dairy sector and innovative operations related to the production of renewable energies. Furthermore, the revised RDP highlights the belief that there s no need to make substantial modifications (i.e. internet investments). Taking into account the additional financing provided by the CAP Health Check and the European Economic Recovery Package, greater strategic priority is being given to initiatives (through existing measures) that contribute to the practice of using bio methane as a source of energy and more efficient effluents management. Expected impact / outcomes of the policies The program provides farmers with income support. Thus the program has little impact on employment and the overall added value of the primary sector; however, the policy undoubtedly has an impact on farmers socio-economic situation. The policy maintains the level of agriculture s employment. The measures of axis 2 safeguard high natural value areas. The policy has a direct positive impact on the improvement of water s quality by reducing inputs, optimizing production and development of new practices, like Agri-Environmental Measure (AEM). However, this positive impact (mainly AEM) is linked to targeting and devising implementation that emphasises the need to create a specific monitoring system. The impact of axis 3 focuses on the improvement of basic services for 30-35% of the population. Specific modifications to impact indicators have been made to take account of the RDP s 2009 alterations. These include new targets for actions such as: targeting the dairy sector to assist producers to adapt to changing market conditions for milk and dairy products; increasing renewable energy production; increasing the management capacity of effluents; promoting the installation of young farmers; and encouraging an agriculture that is environmentally sustainable. Detailed information on impact indicators for individual measures is provided in the RDP indicator tables. 2

RDP budget breakdown by axis: Total expenditure (including national/regional + EAFRD + private funding) of 647,243,886 Axis 4 Axis 3 0.52 5.29 7.93 20.74 6.21 9.31 Private funding EAFRD (Public) National/Regional (Public) Axis 2 2.93 53.00 159.01 Axis 1 30.46 121.85 230.00 Million The RDP budget allocations are broadly divided into four main areas of expenditure, known as axes (namely: Improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector; Improving the environment and the countryside; Quality of life in rural areas and diversification of the rural economy; and Leader). Approximately 59% of the updated RDP budget in Luxembourg is allocated to axis 1 ( 382.31 million), approximately 33% is allocated to axis 2 ( 214.95 million), 6% to axis 3 ( 36.25 million) and 2% to axis 4 ( 13.73 million), with no available funds to Technical Assistance. Within axis 1, National/Regional public funding represents approximately 32% share of the axis funding; EAFRD 8%; and private funds 60%. Within axis 2, National/Regional public funding represents 74% share of the axis funding; EAFRD 25%; and private funds 1%. Within axis 3, National/Regional public funding represents approximately 26% share of the axis funding; EAFRD 17% and private funds 57%. Within axis 4, National/Regional public funding represents approximately 58% share of the axis funding; EAFRD 38%; and private funds 4%. There is no technical assistance funding. As a consequence of the 2009 RDP amendments, Luxembourg has been assigned a total of 24,600,000 (including 4,920,000 EAFRD and 19,680,000 of national/regional public funds) to support innovative operations related to the production of renewable energy and the restructuring of the dairy sector (in a 50%-50% division of funds). In addition, the national authorities in Luxembourg decided not to allocate additional funds to development of broadband infrastructures since they considered that the country is already well equipped (rural areas in particular). 3

Axis Information 2 Axis 1 objectives: Improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector The table below provides an indication of the RDP s axis 1 priorities. Strategic objectives Promote sustainable development in rural and agricultural areas Promote modernisation and innovation of businesses and integration of the production chain that favour environmentally friendly methods Encourage entrepreneurship of agricultural and forestry businesses and enhance generational renewal, labour quality, productivity, social and territorial cohesion Specific objectives - Promote dynamic and innovative attitudes; - Encourage the sustainable use of resources; - Promote synergies between environment requirements and growth. - Promote investments for bio-energy production and environmental protection; - Increase competitiveness in agricultural and forestry businesses (i.e. with a special focus on the dairy sector); - Promote quality products with added on value. - Train and update professionals; - Promote generational renewal. Result targets include: number of holdings/enterprises receiving support to investments related to the transformation of agricultural biomass into renewable energy and efficient management of effluents (4), representing a total volume of investments of 2,460,000; storage capacity for liquid manure (40,000 m 3 ); and number of holdings/enterprises receiving support to investments related to the restructuring of the dairy sector and efficient management of effluents (50), representing a total volume of investments of 2,460,000. Specific modifications to results indicators have been made to take account of the amendments to the RDP including % increases of young farmers; % increases in renewable energy production targets; % reduction of methane emissions (CH4) and replacement of fossil fuels; improvement of the efficiency of the dairy sector; and improvement of storage capacity of effluents in regard to a more respective Nitrate directive. For further information on specific results indicators please refer to the result indicators table in the RDP. 2 A full list of the RDP measures can be found in Annex I. 4

Axis 1 indicative budget breakdown by measure: Total allocated budget (including national/regional public funds + EAFRD + private funds) of 382,314,094 3 - indicative 300 296.07 250 Million 200 150 100 50 0 53.00 21.63 0.95 1.75 7.23 1.69 111 112 114 121 122 123 125 Measures Following the 2009 RDP update, the total budget amount for axis 1 is 382,314,094 including an additional 24,600,000 ( 4,920,000 EAFRD + 19,680,000 national/regional public) that is targeted at assisting producers in the dairy sector to adapt to market changes (abolition of milk quotas in 2015) by restructuring the sector and modernising agricultural holdings (measure 121). The new funds will also be available to assist agricultural holdings in managing effluents (i.e. safe storage) and promote on-farm renewable energy initiatives. Axis 2 objectives: Improving the environment and the countryside The table below provides an indication of the RDP s axis 2 priorities. Strategic objectives Specific objectives Support agricultural activity in less favoured areas and achieve a more - Overcome the decrease of rural activity due to the new trend of rural urbanisation; balanced land development - Actions to bridge the gap between farmers incomes and average salaries in urban settings; - Conserve agricultural activity in disadvantaged areas and promote an efficient soil management. Protection of the territory - Introduce and spread organic and extensive farming techniques; - Prevention against erosion; - Protect forest potential. Conservation of biodiversity and agricultural and forestry areas of high environmental value - Protection of the environment and biodiversity of Natura 2000 sites; - Value the environment and landscape through agricultural and forestry practices (i.e. in terms of preservation of biodiversity and all other environmental aspects). 3 Please note that for measures 111, 113, 115, 124, 126, 131, 132, 133, 141, 142 and 143 no private spending has been allocated. 5

There were no additional result targets following the 2009 revision. No specific modifications to result and output indicators have been made to take account of the amendments to the RDP. For further information on specific results indicators please refer to the result indicators table in the RDP. Axis 2 indicative budget breakdown by measure: Total allocated budget (including national/regional public funds + EAFRD + private funds) of 214,947,129 4 - indicative 120 100 103.60 109.50 Million 80 60 40 20 0 0.93 0.93 212 214 225 227 Measures Following the update of the RDP in 2009, the total budget allocation under axis 2 is 214,947,129. It was decided that additional financing would not greatly benefit the already existent measures in axis 2 and therefore no further allocations took place under the axis. For further information on measures please refer to the indicator tables in the revised RDP. Axis 3 objectives: Quality of life in rural areas and diversification of the rural economy The table below provides an indication of the RDP s axis 3 priorities. Strategic objectives Improve the quality of life in rural areas Maintain and create employment opportunities and income in rural areas Specific objectives - Support the improvement and supply of equitable services; - Prevent rural exodus; - Revitalise and develop rural villages; - Conserve and upgrade cultural heritage in synergy with luxury tourism; - Exploit potential opportunities for sustainable rural development. - Diversification of the rural economy into non-agricultural activities (i.e. crafts activities, indigenous production); - Creation of new employment opportunities (i.e. forests potential). There were no additional result targets following the 2009 revision. 4 For axis 2, private spending has been allocated to measures 214,225 and 227. 6

No specific modifications to result and output indicators have been made to take account of the amendments to the RDP. For further information on specific results indicators please refer to the result indicators table in the RDP. Axis 3 indicative budget breakdown by measure: Total allocated budget (including national/regional public funds + EAFRD + private funds) of 36,250,000 5 - indicative 14 12 13.98 Million 10 8 6 7.99 6.25 4 2 1.21 1.61 2.01 3.19 0 311 312 313 321 322 323 331 Measures Following the 2009 update of the RDP the new total budget allocation for axis 3 is 36,250,000 (with no additional funds). For further information on measures please refer to the indicator tables in the revised RDP. Axis 4 objectives: Leader The main priority under axis 4 is the implementation of competitiveness actions, skills acquisition, revitalisation and improvements to the environment and land management practises to be supported through local development strategies, LAGs (measure 431). Other support is targeted at the implementation of local development strategies that promote quality of life actions and diversifications of rural activities (measure 413). For information on result targets please refer to the impact indicators table in the revised RDP. Strategic objectives Develop local strategies and implement cooperation projects Support the creation, functioning and promotion of LAGs Specific objectives - Promote endogenous development of rural areas capacity for employment and diversification capacity; - Promote inter-regional cooperation as well as cooperation among EU Member States to generate common actions between rural areas. - Efficient functioning of LAGs; - Promote partnerships and propose multi-sectoral strategies for rural development based on the interaction between local and other actors. 5 For measure 341 no private spending has been allocated. 7

The number of LAGs operational in the RDP areas as of March 2010 was five. No modifications were made to axis 4 during the 2009 RDP update. Axis 4 indicative budget breakdown by measure: Total allocated budget (including national/regional public funds + EAFRD + private funds) of 13,732,663 6 - indicative 6 5 5.05 5.08 Million 4 3 2 2.46 1 0.58 0.58 0 411 412 413 421 431 Measures Monitoring and evaluation strategy Evaluation and monitoring measures of the rural development program are based on tracking indicators selected to be more responsive to the monitoring of specific national targets. Data are reported either by the Managing Authorities or by other agents if the data are available at a sectoral or national level. For this purpose, the official statistics of the Central Service for Statistics and Economic Studies can be considered. A service attached to the Ministry of Agriculture, Viticulture and Rural Development would centralize the information needed for the RDP monitoring and evaluation. It will also be authorized to coordinate the annual performance reports and perform system management. To ensure that the accounting data of Farm accountancy data network (FADN) can be used for evaluation or study purposes, the farmers benefiting from free accounts will have to submit accounting data related to their operations, in an anonymous form, to the Ministry of Agriculture. Communication and publicity The management authority has provided an amount of 25,000 per year for information and publicity. These funds are guaranteed within the EAFRD contribution. The Ministry of Agriculture would raise awareness of potential beneficiaries about the opportunities offered by the program and arrangements for access to funding. Promoting direct contact between beneficiaries, competent authorities and agencies is encouraged to ensure informational dissemination. Furthermore, brochures and websites including information on administrative procedures would provide adequate information on the selection criteria and projects evaluation, and also on the contribution of the EAFRD. In addition, the rural development program has been published on the Internet, and official agencies publish press releases, explaining the various measures on websites and during information campaigns. Information on the main achievements in the implementation 6 For measure 431 no private spending has been allocated. 8

and closure of the program is to be provided through press conferences, regional publications (INFO-LEADER) and the reports of the Ministry of Agriculture, Viticulture and Rural Development. 9

Annex I Measures Measures selected by the RDP Measures selected by the updated RDP Axis 1 - Improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector Axis 2 - Improving the environment and the countryside Axis 3 - Quality of life in rural areas and diversification of the rural economy Axis 4 - Leader Promoting knowledge and improving human potential Restructuring and developing physical potential and promoting innovation Quality of agricultural production and products Transitional measures Sustainable use of agricultural land Sustainable use of forestry land Diversify the rural economy Improve the quality of life in rural areas Implementing local development strategies 111 Vocational training and information actions 112 Setting up of young farmers 113 Early retirement 114 Use of advisory services 115 Setting up of management, relief and advisory services 121 Modernisation of agricultural holdings 122 Improvement of the economic value of forests 123 Adding value to agricultural and forestry products Cooperation for development of new products, processes and 124 technologies in the agriculture and food sector and in the forestry sector 125 Infrastructure related to the development and adaptation of agriculture and forestry 126 Restoring agricultural production potential 131 Meeting standards based on Community legislation 132 Participation of farmers in food quality schemes 133 Information and promotion activities 141 Semi-subsistence farming 142 Producer groups 143 Providing farm advisory and extension services 211 Natural handicap payments to farmers in mountain areas 212 Payments to farmers in areas with handicaps, other than mountain areas 213 Natura 2000 payments and payments linked to Directive 2000/60/EC 214 Agri-environment payments 215 Animal welfare payments 216 Non-productive investments 221 First afforestation of agricultural land 222 First establishment of agroforestry systems on agricultural land 223 First afforestation of non-agricultural land 224 Natura 2000 payments 225 Forest-environment payments 226 Restoring forestry potential and introducing prevention actions 227 Non-productive investments 311 Diversification into non-agricultural activities 312 Support for business creation and development 313 Encouragement of tourism activities 321 Basic services for the economy and rural population 322 Village renewal and development 323 Conservation and upgrading of the rural heritage 331 Training and information 341 Skills-acquisition and animation measure with a view to preparing and implementing a local development strategy 411 Competitiveness 412 Environment/land management 413 Quality of life/diversification 421 Implementing cooperation projects 431 Running the local action group, skills acquisition, animation 10