Transcription Start Sites Project Report

Similar documents
Annotation of Contig8 Sakura Oyama Dr. Elgin, Dr. Shaffer, Dr. Bednarski Bio 434W May 2, 2016

Annotation of contig27 in the Muller F Element of D. elegans. Contig27 is a 60,000 bp region located in the Muller F element of the D. elegans.

Collect, analyze and synthesize. Annotation. Annotation for D. virilis. Evidence Based Annotation. GEP goals: Evidence for Gene Models 08/22/2017

Small Exon Finder User Guide

Collect, analyze and synthesize. Annotation. Annotation for D. virilis. GEP goals: Evidence Based Annotation. Evidence for Gene Models 12/26/2018

Annotation of contig62 from Drosophila elegans Dot Chromosome

Annotation of a Drosophila Gene

Outline. Annotation of Drosophila Primer. Gene structure nomenclature. Muller element nomenclature. GEP Drosophila annotation projects 01/04/2018

Agenda. Web Databases for Drosophila. Gene annotation workflow. GEP Drosophila annotation projects 01/01/2018. Annotation adding labels to a sequence

MODULE TSS2: SEQUENCE ALIGNMENTS (ADVANCED)

Drosophila ficusphila F element

Agenda. Annotation of Drosophila. Muller element nomenclature. Annotation: Adding labels to a sequence. GEP Drosophila annotation projects 01/03/2018

MODULE TSS1: TRANSCRIPTION START SITES INTRODUCTION (BASIC)

Outline 08/2018. Searching for Transcription Start Sites in Drosophila. TSS of F element genes show lower levels of H3K9me3 and HP1a

Draft 3 Annotation of DGA06H06, Contig 1 Jeannette Wong Bio4342W 27 April 2009

Lab Week 9 - A Sample Annotation Problem (adapted by Chris Shaffer from a worksheet by Varun Sundaram, WU-STL, Class of 2009)

Annotation Walkthrough Workshop BIO 173/273 Genomics and Bioinformatics Spring 2013 Developed by Justin R. DiAngelo at Hofstra University

MODULE 5: TRANSLATION

Outline. Introduction to ab initio and evidence-based gene finding. Prokaryotic gene predictions

Annotation of Drosophila erecta Contig 14. Kimberly Chau Dr. Laura Hoopes. Pomona College 24 February 2009

Annotating Fosmid 14p24 of D. Virilis chromosome 4

Annotation Practice Activity [Based on materials from the GEP Summer 2010 Workshop] Special thanks to Chris Shaffer for document review Parts A-G

ORTHOMINE - A dataset of Drosophila core promoters and its analysis. Sumit Middha Advisor: Dr. Peter Cherbas

Genomic Annotation Lab Exercise By Jacob Jipp and Marian Kaehler Luther College, Department of Biology Genomics Education Partnership 2010

Annotating 7G24-63 Justin Richner May 4, Figure 1: Map of my sequence

Chimp Sequence Annotation: Region 2_3

ab initio and Evidence-Based Gene Finding

UCSC Genome Browser. Introduction to ab initio and evidence-based gene finding

BME 110 Midterm Examination

Assessing De-Novo Transcriptome Assemblies

Question 2: There are 5 retroelements (2 LINEs and 3 LTRs), 6 unclassified elements (XDMR and XDMR_DM), and 7 satellite sequences.

user s guide Question 1

Aaditya Khatri. Abstract

Browser Exercises - I. Alignments and Comparative genomics

Annotating the D. virilis Fourth Chromosome: Fosmid 99M21

user s guide Question 3

Chimp Chunk 3-14 Annotation by Matthew Kwong, Ruth Howe, and Hao Yang

user s guide Question 3

BIO4342 Lab Exercise: Detecting and Interpreting Genetic Homology

MODULE 1: INTRODUCTION TO THE GENOME BROWSER: WHAT IS A GENE?

TIGR THE INSTITUTE FOR GENOMIC RESEARCH

Gene Model Annotations for Drosophila melanogaster: Impact of High throughput Data

RNA-Seq Analysis. August Strand Genomics, Inc All rights reserved.

Finishing of DELE Drosophila elegans has been sequenced using Roche 454 pyrosequencing and Illumina

nature methods A paired-end sequencing strategy to map the complex landscape of transcription initiation

Finishing of Fosmid 1042D14. Project 1042D14 is a roughly 40 kb segment of Drosophila ananassae

Finishing of DFIC This project sought to finish DFIC , the terminal 45 kb of the Drosophila

Gene Identification in silico

Guided tour to Ensembl

Ensembl workshop. Thomas Randall, PhD bioinformatics.unc.edu. handouts, papers, datasets

Identifying Genes and Pseudogenes in a Chimpanzee Sequence Adapted from Chimp BAC analysis: TWINSCAN and UCSC Browser by Dr. M.

Leonardo Mariño-Ramírez, PhD NCBI / NLM / NIH. BIOL 7210 A Computational Genomics 2/18/2015

Greene 1. Finishing of DEUG The entire genome of Drosophila eugracilis has recently been sequenced using Roche

Chimp BAC analysis: Adapted by Wilson Leung and Sarah C.R. Elgin from Chimp BAC analysis: TWINSCAN and UCSC Browser by Dr. Michael R.

Exercises (Multiple sequence alignment, profile search)

Gene Prediction Group

Week 1 BCHM 6280 Tutorial: Gene specific information using NCBI, Ensembl and genome viewers

Sequence Based Function Annotation

Post-assembly Data Analysis

BCHM 6280 Tutorial: Gene specific information using NCBI, Ensembl and genome viewers

Hands-On Four Investigating Inherited Diseases

Introduction to RNAseq Analysis. Milena Kraus Apr 18, 2016

Whole Transcriptome Analysis of Illumina RNA- Seq Data. Ryan Peters Field Application Specialist

NGS Approaches to Epigenomics

FINDING GENES AND EXPLORING THE GENE PAGE AND RUNNING A BLAST (Exercise 1)

About Strand NGS. Strand Genomics, Inc All rights reserved.

Bacterial Genome Annotation

User s Manual Version 1.0

The goal of this project was to prepare the DEUG contig which covers the

Array-Ready Oligo Set for the Rat Genome Version 3.0

Finishing Drosophila ananassae Fosmid 2410F24

Genome annotation & EST

Aligning GENCODE and RefSeq transcripts By EMBL-EBI and NCBI

Proteogenomics. Kelly Ruggles, Ph.D. Proteomics Informatics Week 9

Sequence Analysis. II: Sequence Patterns and Matrices. George Bell, Ph.D. WIBR Bioinformatics and Research Computing

Bioinformatics Course AA 2017/2018 Tutorial 2

Gene Finding Genome Annotation

Gene Prediction. Mario Stanke. Institut für Mikrobiologie und Genetik Abteilung Bioinformatik. Gene Prediction p.

Finishing Drosophila Grimshawi Fosmid Clone DGA19A15. Matthew Kwong Bio4342 Professor Elgin February 23, 2010

Applications of short-read

Galaxy Platform For NGS Data Analyses


Figure 1. FasterDB SEARCH PAGE corresponding to human WNK1 gene. In the search page, gene searching, in the mouse or human genome, can be done: 1- By

Lecture 7 Motif Databases and Gene Finding

ChIP-seq and RNA-seq

From Variants to Pathways: Agilent GeneSpring GX s Variant Analysis Workflow

BIOINFORMATICS IN BIOCHEMISTRY

Analysis of neo-antigens to identify T-cell neo-epitopes in human Head & Neck cancer. Project XX1001. Customer Detail

Figure S1: NUN preparation yields nascent, unadenylated RNA with a different profile from Total RNA.

Sequencing applications. Today's outline. Hands-on exercises. Applications of short-read sequencing: RNA-Seq and ChIP-Seq

Finishing Drosophila elegans Contig DELE This project aimed to finish the contig DELE from the F element (chromosome 6)

BIOINFORMATICS TO ANALYZE AND COMPARE GENOMES

CS313 Exercise 1 Cover Page Fall 2017

Transcriptome analysis

Interpreting RNA-seq data (Browser Exercise II)

Year III Pharm.D Dr. V. Chitra

Thousands of corresponding human and mouse genomic regions unalignable in primary sequence contain. Elfar Þórarinsson February 2006

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology: doi: /nsmb Supplementary Figure 1. Validation of CDK9-inhibitor treatment.

Introduction to RNA sequencing

BLASTing through the kingdom of life

Transcription:

Transcription Start Sites Project Report Student name: Student email: Faculty advisor: College/university: Project details Project name: Project species: Date of submission: Number of genes in project: Does this report cover TSS annotations for all of the genes or is it a partial report? If this is a partial report, please indicate the region of the project covered by this report: From base to base Note: In some cases, the reconciled gene models (available under "Genes and Gene Prediction Tracks" "Reconciled Gene Models" on the GEP UCSC Genome Browser) might be incorrect because of misannotations or because of updates to the D. melanogaster gene models from FlyBase. This could result in situations where you will need to construct a new gene model for the coding region prior to performing the TSS annotation. If you find one or more genes with this problem, you should fully document the new gene annotation(s) by completing the Revised gene models report form found on page 8 of this report. Transcription start sites (TSS) report form Complete this report form for each gene in your project. Copy and paste this form to create as many copies as needed. Gene name (e.g., D. biarmipes eyeless): Gene symbol (e.g., dbia_ey): Name(s) of isoform(s) with unique TSS List of isoforms with identical TSS Names of the isoforms with unique TSS in D. melanogaster that are absent in this species: 1

Isoform TSS report Complete this report form for each unique TSS listed in the table above. Copy and paste this form to create as many copies as needed within this report. Gene-isoform name (e.g., dbia_ey-ra): Names of the isoforms with the same TSS as this isoform: Type of core promoter in D. melanogaster (Peaked / Intermediate / Broad / Insufficient Evidence): The type of core promoter is defined by the number of TSS annotated by the Celniker group at modencode and the number of DHS positions: Type of core promoter # annotated TSS # DHS positions 1 0 Peaked 0 1 1 1 Intermediate 1 > 1 > 1 1 Broad > 1 > 1 Insufficient Evidence 0 0 Coordinates of the first transcribed exon based on blastn alignment: Coordinate(s) of the TSS position(s): Based on blastn alignment: Based on core promoter motifs (e.g., Inr): Based on other evidence (please specify): Note: If the blastn alignment for the initial transcribed exon is a partial alignment, you can extrapolate the TSS position based on the number of nucleotides that are missing from the beginning of the exon. (Enter Insufficient evidence if you cannot determine the TSS position based on the available evidence.) 2

Coordinate(s) of the TSS search region(s): Note: If part of the TSS search region is only weakly supported by the available evidence, then please specify both a wide and a narrow search region. For example, if the region at 1500-2000 shows high RNA-Seq read coverage but there is very low RNA-Seq coverage from 1000-1499, then you will report 1000-2000 (wide) as the wide search region and 1500-2000 (narrow) as the narrow search region. Describe the evidence used to define the TSS search region(s) (e.g., RNA-Seq and Conservation tracks in this species, RAMPAGE data from D. melanogaster): 1. Evidence that supports the TSS annotation postulated above Were you able to define the TSS position(s) based on the blastn alignment? If so, indicate whether the evidence listed below support the TSS position(s). If not, indicate whether the evidence listed below support the TSS search region(s). Evidence type Support Refute Neither blastn alignment of the initial exon from D. melanogaster RNA PolII ChIP-Seq RNA-Seq coverage and TopHat splice junctions Core promoter motifs Sequence conservation with other Drosophila species (e.g., Conservation track on the Genome Browser) Other (please specify) Note: The evidence type refutes the TSS annotation only if it suggests an alternate TSS position. For example, the presence of RNA-Seq read coverage upstream of the annotated TSS indicates that the TSS is located further upstream and it would be considered to be evidence against (i.e. Refute) the annotated TSS. In contrast, the lack of RNA-Seq read coverage is a negative result and it neither supports nor refutes the TSS annotation (i.e. Neither). Provide an explanation if the TSS annotation is inconsistent with at least one of the evidence types specified above: 3

If the TSS annotation is supported by blastn alignment of the initial transcribed exon against the contig sequence, paste a screenshot of the blastn alignment into the box below: 4

If the TSS annotation is supported by core promoter motifs, RNA PolII ChIP-Seq, or RNA-Seq data, paste a Genome Browser screenshot of the region surrounding the TSS (±300bp) with the following evidence tracks: 1. RNA PolII Peaks 2. RNA-Seq Alignment Summary 3. RNA-Seq TopHat 4. Short Match results for the Inr motif (TCAKTY) If the TSS annotation is supported by sequence conservation with other Drosophila species, paste a screenshot of the pairwise alignment (e.g., from blastn) or the multiple sequence alignment (e.g., from Clustal Omega, ROAST) into the box below: 5

2. Search for core promoter motifs The consensus sequences for the Drosophila core promoter motifs are available at http://gander.wustl.edu/~wilson/core_promoter_motifs.html Use the "Short Match" functionality in the GEP UCSC Genome Browser to search for each of the core promoter motifs listed below in the region surrounding the TSS (±300bp) in your project and in the D. melanogaster ortholog. For TSS annotations where you can only define a TSS search region, you should report all motif instances within the narrow TSS search region. (Note that the narrow TSS search region differs from the TSS search region only when you have defined both a wide and a narrow TSS search region.) Coordinates of the motif search region Your project (e.g., contig10:1000-1600): Orthologous region in D. melanogaster: Record the orientation and the start coordinate (e.g., +10000) of each motif match below. (Enter "NA" if there are no motif instances within the search region.) Note: Highlight (in yellow) the motif instances that support the TSS annotation above. Core promoter motif Your project D. melanogaster BRE u TATA Box BRE d Inr MTE DPE Ohler_motif1 DRE Ohler_motif5 Ohler_motif6 Ohler_motif7 Ohler_motif8 6

Have you annotated all the TSS that are in your project? Use the GEP UCSC Genome Browser for D. melanogaster to identify the genes located adjacent to the first and last reconciled genes in your project. For each unique TSS of these D. melanogaster genes, perform a blastn search of the initial transcribed exon against your project using the more sensitive search parameters (i.e. Word size = 7; Match/Mismatch Scores = 1, -1; Gap Costs = Existence: 2 Extension: 1; turn off the low complexity filter). Paste the screenshots of the blastn search results in the box below. Provide an explanation for any significant (E-value < 1e-2) hits and why these hits do not correspond to real transcribed exons in your project. Name of the D. melanogaster gene adjacent to the first reconciled gene in your project: Name of the D. melanogaster gene adjacent to the last reconciled gene in your project: Screenshots of the blastn search results: 7

Revised gene models report form Complete this section if there are any changes to the coding regions of the reconciled gene models. Copy and paste this form to create as many copies as needed within this report. Gene name (e.g., D. biarmipes eyeless): Gene symbol (e.g., dbia_ey): FlyBase release (e.g., 6.25): Name(s) of isoforms that have been removed from the current FlyBase release: Name(s) of new or revised isoform(s) with unique coding sequences List of isoforms with identical coding sequences Names of the isoforms with unique coding sequences in D. melanogaster that are absent in this species: Note: For each revised gene model listed above, you should use the Gene Model Checker to create the corresponding GFF, transcript, and peptide sequence files. You should use the Annotation Files Merger to combine the files for all the revised gene models into a single project GFF, transcript, and peptide sequence file prior to project submission. Consensus sequence errors report form Complete this section if there are any errors within the consensus sequence that affect the revised gene models or the Transcription Start Sites (TSS) annotations. The coordinates reported in this section should be relative to the coordinates of the original project sequence. Location(s) within the project sequence with consensus errors: 8

1. Evidence that supports the consensus errors postulated above Note: Evidence that could be used to support the hypothesis of errors within the consensus sequence include CDS alignment with frame shifts or in-frame stop codons, multiple RNA-Seq reads with discrepant alignments compared to the project sequence, and multiple high quality discrepancies in the Consed assembly. 2. Generate a VCF file which describes the changes to the consensus sequence Using the Sequencer Updater (available through the GEP web site under Projects Annotation Resources ), create a Variant Call Format (VCF) file that describes the changes to the consensus sequence. Paste a screenshot with the list of sequence changes into the box below: 9

Revised isoform report form Complete this report form for each unique isoform where the proposed gene model differs from the reconciled gene model. Copy and paste this form to create as many copies as needed within this report. Gene-isoform name (e.g., dbia_ey-pa): Names of the isoforms with identical coding sequences as this isoform: Is the 5 end of this isoform missing from the end of project? If so, how many exons are missing from the 5 end: Is the 3 end of this isoform missing from the end of the project? If so, how many exons are missing from the 3 end: Describe the evidence used to support the proposed changes to the reconciled gene model: 1. Gene Model Checker checklist Enter the coordinates of your final gene model for this isoform into the Gene Model Checker and paste a screenshot of the checklist results into the box below: Note: For projects with consensus sequence errors, report the exon coordinates relative to the original project sequence. Include the VCF file you have generated above when you submit the gene model to the Gene Model Checker. The Gene Model Checker will use this VCF file to automatically revise the submitted exon coordinates. 10

2. View the gene model on the Genome Browser Use the custom track feature from the Gene Model Checker to capture a screenshot of your gene model shown on the Genome Browser for your project. Zoom in so that only this isoform is in the screenshot. (See page 12 of the Gene Model Checker user guide on how to do this; you can find the guide under Help Documentations Web Framework on the GEP website at http://gep.wustl.edu.) Include the following evidence tracks in the screenshot if they are available: 1. A sequence alignment track (D. mel Proteins or Other RefSeq) 2. At least one gene prediction track (e.g., Genscan) 3. At least one RNA-Seq track (e.g., RNA-Seq Alignment Summary) 4. A comparative genomics track (e.g., Conservation, D. mel. Net Alignment) Paste a screenshot of your gene model as shown on the GEP UCSC Genome Browser into the box below: 11

3. Alignment between the submitted model and the D. melanogaster ortholog Show an alignment between the protein sequence for your gene model and the protein sequence from the putative D. melanogaster ortholog. You can either use the protein alignment generated by the Gene Model Checker (available through the View protein alignment link under the Dot Plot tab) or you can generate a new alignment using the Align two or more sequences feature (bl2seq) at the NCBI BLAST web site. Paste a screenshot of the protein alignment into the box below: 12

4. Dot plot between the submitted model and the D. melanogaster ortholog Paste a screenshot of the dot plot of your submitted model against the putative D. melanogaster ortholog (generated by the Gene Model Checker) into the box below. Provide an explanation for any anomalies on the dot plot (e.g., large gaps, regions with no sequence similarity). Note: Large vertical and horizontal gaps near exon boundaries in the dot plot often indicate that an incorrect splice site might have been picked. Please re-examine these regions and provide a justification as to why you have selected this particular set of donor and acceptor sites. 13