Scoping and 30-Day Notice and Comment Period for. Grassy Knob American Chestnut Planting

Similar documents
Cheat Mountain Wildlife Habitat Enhancement

Draft Decision Memo Santiam Junction Maintenance Station Truck Shop Extension

CHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT

Decision Memo. Cabin #5 Electric, Water, Septic Improvements

DECISION MEMO. Wildlife Habitat Improvement Project Wildlife Opening Construction, Rehabilitation and Expansion FY

DECISION MEMO. Cheat-Potomac Ranger District Multiple Recreation Facilities and Related Granger-Thye Concessions Special Use Permit

U.S.D.A. Forest Service National Forest & Grasslands in Texas Angelina National Forest Angelina/Sabine Ranger District Jasper County, Texas

Decision Memo. Programmatic Forest Plan Amendment for Cultural Resource Protection Standards and Guidelines. United States Department of Agriculture

DECISION MEMO SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION FOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS

PROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project

PRELIMINARY DECISION MEMO

Preliminary Decision Memo Recreation Residence Septic Repairs

Huron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647

DECISION MEMO MANHATTAN FUELS REDUCTION PROJECT U.S. FOREST SERVICE CANYON LAKES RANGER DISTRICT LARIMER COUNTY, CO

SHASTA-MCCLOUD MANAGEMENT UNIT OVER SNOW VEHICLE TRAIL GROOMING AND SNOWMOBILE FACILITY MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL

DECISION MEMO SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION FOR PRIVATE ROAD PERMIT

KENTUCKY UTILITIES SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION AMENDMENT: MOUNT VICTORY TRANSMISSION TOWER REPLACEMENT DECISION MEMO

Draft Decision Memo OHV Trails 22 and 42 Reroute Project

DECISION MEMO Eureka Fire Whitebark Pine Planting

DECISION MEMO Robinhood Creek Helicopter Log Deck June, 2008

The location of the valve site is displayed on a map in the project file.

DECISION MEMO FOURTH OF JULY PARK 2 USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Red River Ranger District, Nez Perce National Forest Idaho County, Idaho

DECISION MEMO. Griz Thin (Stand )

Michigan Wing-Civil Air Patrol

DECISION MEMO 4-H Tree Farm LLC Driveway Permit

Final Decision Memo. Murphy Meadow Restoration Project. USDA Forest Service Willamette National Forest McKenzie River Ranger District

DECISION MEMO. Bull Bear 1H-18 Oil and Gas Pipeline

DECISION MEMO OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (ODOT) SAND SHED CINDER PIT EXPLORATION PROJECT

DECISION MEMO. Kelly s Pond / NFSR 204 Hazard Tree Removal. USDA Forest Service Sam Houston National Forest Montgomery County, Texas

Decision Memo Starkey Elk Handling Facility Water System Improvements

Environmental Assessment

Decision Memo North Boundary Salvage

Wetland Creation Project. Decision Memo

Decision Memo for the City of Detroit Root Rot Timber Sale Project

BACKGROUND DECISION. June 2016 Page 1 of 6

Decision Memo for Pax Ponderosa Pine Planting Project

Decision Memo Raptor 1 and 9 Prescribed Burns Project

General Location: Approximately 6 miles east of Huntsville, Utah along the South Fork of the Ogden River (Figure 1)

Decision Memo Sawtooth Trail #3634 Reroute

DECISION MEMO Clay Butte Radio Repeater Relocation Project

USDA Forest Service Decision Memo. Mattie V Creek Minesite Rehabilitation Project

DECISION MEMO SFA EXPERIMENTAL FOREST HERBACEOUS POND RESTORATION AUGUST, 2009 ANGELINA/SABINE RANGER DISTRICT ANGELINA NATIONAL FOREST

DECISION MEMO. East Fork Blacktail Trail Reroute

DECISION MEMO JASON MINE-BAT HABITAT IMPROVEMENT AND MINE CLOSURE Section 22, T. 13S., R. 2W. Union County, Illinois

I. Decision to be Implemented. II. Reasons for Categorically Excluding the Decision. A. Description of Decision - 1 -

Kinder/Morgan Southern Natural Gas. Right-of-Way Maintenance Project Woody Vegetation Control. Decision Notice And Finding of No Significant Impact

DECISION MEMO Divide Creek Barrier Enhancement

Decision Memo. North Fork Calispell Creek Restoration Project

Decision Memo Halliburton Ann Exploration Project U.S. Forest Service Austin Ranger District, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Nye County, Nevada

Decision Memo. Delta A Septic Repair (#33)

DECISION MEMO. Non-Commercial Thinning on the Ocala National Forest (PALS project # 39238)

Preliminary Decision Memo

I. DECISION. A. Description of Decision

Decision Memo Tongass National Forest. Wrangell Ranger District. Pre-Commercial Thinning CE 2010

DECISION MEMO SMART CREEK MINERAL EXPLORATION PROJECT

DECISION MEMO. Steve Simpson and Associates, Inc. Simpson #114 & #116 Gas Well Project Compartment 106

DECISION MEMO POT MOUNTAIN TRAIL CONSTRUCTION USDA

DECISION MEMO. USDA Forest Service. Butte District Silver Bow County T4N, R8W, Section 36

PROJECT INFORMATION Warren Falls Parking Lot Expansion Project

DECISION MEMO WEST RIVER COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY BURIED FIBER OPTIC CABLE PROJECT

DECISION MEMO. West Fork Blacktail Deer Creek Hardened Crossing

DECISION MEMO. Newfield Exploration Company Mineral Proposal PDU ASH #K1MB Compartment 16

Decision Memo Rose Canyon Salvage Project

Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest Madison Ranger District

DECISION MEMO Pony Whitebark Pine Planting

DECISION MEMO ISSUE AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING SPECIAL USE PERMIT

DECISION MEMO Lazyman Repeater Shelter and Tower Replacement

Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest Pintler Ranger District

Wildlife Habitat Restoration and Improvements FY 2007 Project

Pinecrest Amphitheater Movies Special Use Permit (40431) Decision Memo

DECISION NOTICE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI)

Pheasant Mountain Timber Stand Improvement (TSI) Decision Memo

Background. Purpose and Need. Proposal. Mitigation and Design Features

DECISION MEMO. Crow Creek Hardened Crossing

Civil Rights Impact Analysis for Sault Ste. Marie Conveyance/Raco Construction Project

Decision Memo Hungry Creek Watershed Road Maintenance and Stony Quarry Development Project

Scoping Report for the Aldridge Creek Tornado Salvage Project 51712

DRAFT DECISION MEMO WHITE PASS BASE COMMUNICATION SITE U.S. FOREST SERVICE

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

Small Project Proposal

Scoping Document. Sardine/Cloudburst Meadow Restoration Project. United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service.

DECISION MEMO PAYETTE LAKES SKI CLUB BEAR BASIN AMENDMENT U.S. FOREST SERVICE PAYETTE NATIONAL FOREST MCCALL RANGER DISTRICT ADAMS COUNTY, IDAHO

Decision Memo Special Forest Products Sales. USDA Forest Service Detroit Ranger District, Willamette National Forest Marion & Linn County, Oregon

On/Off periods Improvements Grazing System. 2 fence segments. 1 water development, 2 cattle guards

DECISION MEMO. Vipond Water Development

DECISION MEMO LOWER STILLWATER FISHERY ENHANCEMENT U.S. FOREST SERVICE DUCHESNE RANGER DISTRICT ASHLEY NATIONAL FOREST DUCHESNE COUNTY, UTAH

DECISION MEMO For ASL (Allegheny Snowmobile Loop) Marshburg Connector Project

Coronado National Forest Sierra Vista Ranger District

DECISION MEMO WILLOW CREEK RECREATION AREA FACILITY RESTORATION U.S. FOREST SERVICE WILLOW CREEK RESERVE RANGER DISTRICT CATRON COUNTY, NEW MEXICO

The project will be conducted in partnership with the Nez Perce Tribe.

Decision Memo Cow Pen Project. USDA Forest Service Talladega National Forest - Oakmulgee District Bibb and Tuscaloosa Counties, Alabama

DECISION MEMO WELDON MEADOW MINE RECLAMATION PROJECT U.S. FOREST SERVICE, SEQUOIA NATIONAL FOREST KERN RIVER RANGER DISTRICT KERN COUNTY, CA

RECORD OF DECISION BATTLE PARK C&H ALLOTMENTS FOR LIVESTOCK GRAZING ON THE AND MISTY MOON S&G. United States Department of Agriculture.

Tenmile and Priest Pass Restoration Project Scoping Notice

Forest Plan Amendment to Remove the Layng Creek Municipal Watershed Management Plan

Tub Run Abandoned Coal Mine Restoration Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact

Why does the Forest Service need to propose this activity at this time?

Mount Diablo Baseline and Meridian. T42N, R54E, Section 29 and 30

Decision Memo Young Stand Density Management and Conifer Pruning

DRAFT DECISION NOTICE AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ROAD/TRAIL DECOMMISSIONING AND SEASONAL CLOSURE PROJECT U.S.

Transcription:

United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Monongahela National Forest Greenbrier Ranger District Box 67 Bartow, WV 24920 Phone (304) 456-3335 File Code: 2020/2070/1950 Date: November 15, 2012 Scoping and 30-Day Notice and Comment Period for Dear Interested Parties: The Forest Service is proposing to plant approximately 1,000 seedlings from blight-resistant American chestnut trees over 3 acres on the Greenbrier Ranger District of the Monongahela National Forest. This letter is to inform you of the proposal and to invite you to participate by providing any comments or information that you have concerning the proposal. I. Type of Analysis to be Conducted This proposal potentially falls in a category of actions excluded from analysis in an Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as proposals of this type individually and cumulatively do not have a significant effect on the human environment (36 CFR 220.6(e)). Forest Service categorical exclusions are defined in the Forest Service Handbook, at FSH 1909.15 (Environmental Policy and Procedures Handbook), Chapter 30 (Categorical Exclusion from Documentation), Section 30.3 (Policy), which states that and 1. A proposed action may be categorically excluded from further analysis and documentation in an environmental impact statement (EIS) or environmental assessment (EA) only if there are no extraordinary circumstances related to the proposed action 2. Resource conditions that should be considered in determining whether extraordinary circumstances related to the proposed action warrant further analysis and documentation in an EA or an EIS are [see resource conditions in Section VII below]. The mere presence of one or more of these resource conditions does not preclude use of a categorical exclusion. It is the existence of a cause-effect relationship between a proposed action and the potential effect on these resource conditions and if such a relationship exists, the degree of the potential effect of a proposed action on these resource conditions that determine whether extraordinary circumstances exist. (36 CFR 220.6(b); FSH 1909.15, Section 32.2(6)). This proposal falls under category FSH 1909.15, Chapter 30, Section 32.2(5), and 36 CFR 220.6(e)(5): Regeneration of an area to native tree species, including site preparation that does not involve the use of herbicides or result in vegetation type conversion. 1 of 6

II. Public Involvement Process: How to Get Additional Information, Provide Comments, and Qualify to Appeal the Decision A recent court ruling (Sequoia Forestkeeper v. Tidwell) requires that actions that can be categorically excluded using categories found at 36 CFR 220.6(e) be subject to public notice, comment, and opportunity for administrative appeal. Therefore, this decision is subject to a 30- day notice and comment period, and appeal in accordance with 36 CFR 215. Scoping and the 30-day notice and comment period for this project are being initiated with this letter and with the publication of a legal notice in The Pocahontas Times, the newspaper of record for this project. Relevant comments will help guide the analysis. Written, faxed, hand-delivered, oral, and electronic comments concerning this action will be accepted for 30 calendar days following the publication of this notice in The Pocahontas Times. The publication date in the newspaper of record is the exclusive means for calculating the comment period for this analysis. Those wishing to comment should not rely upon dates or timeframe information provided by any other source. The regulations prohibit extending the length of the comment period. It is the responsibility of persons providing comments to submit them by the close of the comment period. To provide comments, request additional information, or if you wish to receive future information on this proposed project, you must contact Kristine Vollmer, the Environmental Coordinator for this analysis: Phone: (304) 257-4488. Leave a message with your name and phone number if Kristine is not available, and she will return your call. Fax: 304-257-2482 (Attn: Kristine Vollmer) Mail or In Person: Monongahela National Forest Attn: Kristine Vollmer 2499 North Fork Highway Petersburg, WV 26847 The office business hours are Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 12:00 and 12:30 to 4:30. E-mail: comments-eastern-monongahela-greenbrier@fs.fed.us. Please include the project name in the subject line of the e-mail. Electronic comments must be submitted in a format such as an email message, plain text (.txt), rich text format (.rtf), Portable Document Format (pdf), or Word (.doc)-compatible document. The final decision on this project will be subject to appeal pursuant to 36 CFR 215.11; unless no comments expressing concerns (or only supportive comments) are received during this 30-day comment period (36 CFR 215.12(e)(1)). Appeals may be filed by persons or non-federal organizations or entities that provide comments or otherwise express interest in the proposed action by the close of the comment period. For appeal eligibility, each individual or representative from each organization submitting comments must either sign the comments or verify identity upon request. Individuals and organizations wishing to be eligible to appeal must meet the information requirements of 36 CFR 215.6.Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposed action, and will be available for public inspection. 2 of 6

Figure 1. Vicinity Map 3 of 6

III. Project Location The project area, an estimated 3 acres, is located on the Greenbrier Ranger District of the Monongahela National Forest. Planting would take place in Stand 75 in Compartment 98. This stand is located south of Thornwood, in Pocahontas County, West Virginia (see Figure 1). The area is south of Lake Buffalo and Forest Road 54D. IV. Purpose and Need for the Proposal The MNF is proposing to take action to establish American chestnut and test their resistance to the chestnut blight fungus. American chestnut was once a very common tree in the forests of West Virginia. With the introduction of the chestnut blight fungus from Asia in the early 1900s, American chestnut was all but eliminated from eastern forests. In the 1980s, a breeding program was started to produce American chestnuts that are resistant to chestnut blight fungus by breeding American chestnut and Chinese chestnut. After 30 years, the breeding program has produced American chestnuts believed to be highly resistant to the chestnut blight fungus. In 2008, the American Chestnut Foundation and the Forest Service entered into an agreement to plant the resistant American chestnut on National Forests in the native range of American chestnut. V. Forest Plan Direction Forest Plan (2006, as updated in 2011) direction most applicable to the proposed Grassy Knob American Chestnut Planting project is described below. This project proposal is designed to comply with Forest Plan and other relevant direction. VI. Goal 6132 in Management Prescription (MP) 6.1 (p. III-32): Maintain, restore, or enhance mast-producing trees and habitat diversity. Goal VE07 (p. II-18): Maintain or restore rare plant communities or individual populations to contribute to the biodiversity of the forest. Goal VE09 (p. II-18): Work with researchers, ecologists, geneticists and other interested parties to develop seed zones or breeding zones for native plants. Forest Plan Appendix A Vegetation Management Practices (p. A-16): Planting: Although hardwood forests normally regenerate naturally after a timber harvest occurs, planting is sometimes used in stands to improve species diversity. Competition for sunlight, moisture, and soil nutrients is intense when a stand is regenerated. To improve the potential for planted seedlings to grow into and be retained as a viable component within a stand, protective tree shelters may be used to improve survival. A tree shelter acts like a mini greenhouse, providing increased temperatures over longer time periods than in open conditions, resulting in increased survival rates and overall growth of the planted seedlings. Tree shelters are also put in place to protect the seedlings from deer browsing. Project Description Approximately 1,000 seedlings from blight-resistant American chestnut trees would be planted in Stand 75 of Compartment 98. This stand was cut in 2000 with a clearcut prescription. Due to 4 of 6

heavy deer browsing, a 3-acre area within the stand failed to regenerate. Within this area, the seedlings would be planted by hand, with a spacing of roughly 8 feet by 8 feet. A 6.5 foot-high fence would be installed around the area to prevent deer browsing damage to the seedlings. No new roads would be required; all work would use existing roads. No logging equipment or herbicides would be used. VII. Effects to Categories of Extraordinary Circumstances 1. Federally listed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitat, species proposed for Federal listing or proposed critical habitat, or Forest Service sensitive species (TES species). Botany TES: This project would be wholly beneficial and is highly unlikely to have any direct, indirect, or cumulative adverse effects related to TES or NNIS plant species. Terrestrial Wildlife TES: This project would have no direct, indirect, or cumulative adverse effects to TES wildlife. In the long term, the American chestnut trees may provide mast for wildlife. 2. Flood plains, wetlands, or municipal watersheds and Aquatic TES Due to the distant proximity of this project from aquatic and riparian habitats and the low potential for soil disturbance or risks to aquatic resources associated with this, there are no aquatic resource concerns for direct, indirect, or cumulative effects to aquatic TES species, flood plains, wetlands, or municipal watersheds associated with the proposed planting activity and fence construction. 3. Congressionally designated areas, such as wilderness, wilderness study areas, or national recreation areas. This project would have no direct, indirect, or cumulative effects to congressionally designated areas due to the project s distance from these areas and the lack of potential for impacts to these areas. 4. Inventoried roadless areas or potential wilderness areas. This project would have no direct, indirect, or cumulative effects to inventoried roadless areas or potential wilderness areas due to the project s distance from these areas and the lack of potential for impacts to these areas. 5. Research natural areas. This project would have no direct, indirect, or cumulative effects to research natural areas due to the project s distance from these areas and the lack of potential for impacts to these areas. 6. American Indians and Alaska Native religious or cultural sites. 7. Archaeological sites, or historic properties or areas. The planting of trees using hand tools is an activity specifically exempted from Section 106 consultation under the terms of our Programmatic Agreement with the WV SHPO and the ACHP (Exemption F13). The implementation of this project would have no effect to historic properties, archaeological sites, or historic properties or areas. This finding is made pursuant to the terms of 5 of 6

our Programmatic Agreement with the WVSHPO and the ACHP, executed under the terms of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and its implementing regulations: 36 CFR 800: Protection of Historic Properties. 8. Other extraordinary circumstances. No other extraordinary circumstances for other resources have been identified that would warrant further analysis in an EA or EIS. VIII. Time Frame We expect to complete the Decision Memo in the winter of 2012/2013. When the Decision Memo is available, a formal public notice will be given in the form of a legal notice, which will be published in The Pocahontas Times. Individuals or organizations who previously provided comments on this project or indicated that they would like additional information on this project will also be notified. I look forward to your participation in the management of the Monongahela National Forest. Sincerely, /s/ Jack Tribble November 15, 2012 JACK TRIBLE Greenbrier District Ranger Date USDA Nondiscrimination Statement The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 6 of 6