Dipl.-Ing. Edmond D. Krecké, Luxembourg. 1. Starting position

Similar documents
TERRASOL CONNECTION OF SOLAR AND NEAR-SURFACE GEOTHERMAL ENERGY

Effects of the use of DIN on the energetic assessment of residential buildings reflection on the calculation

Experimental Study to Evaluate the Performance of Iraqi Passive House in Summer Season

Solar Energy Technologies

LOW-ENERGY HOUSING ESTATE SUNDAYS

Sustainable Building Façade and Advanced Fenestration Systems

AM-55, AM-56) B U I L D I N G P A R T N E R S H I P S F O R E N E R G Y S E C U R I T Y

Energy-Efficient Passive House using thermal mass to achieve high thermal comfort

Verified net Zero Energy Building with air source heat pumps for SME

nzeb Germany - Strategy to improve energy efficiency in the German building sector and the leading role of public buildings Dr.-Ing.

PASSIVE HOUSE. is a building, which doesn t need an active type of heating. Dr. Ing Mihail Stancu

Solar Power. Technical Aspects and Environmental Impacts. 6 th March 2011 Sustainable Energy Options (UAU212F) - University of Iceland

Passive houses for the Northern climate

Active solar heating system with concrete plate heating analysed with dynamical thermal simulations

Energy consumption and thermal comfort in a passive house built in Romania

Application technology, 5th edition. Volume III: Fonterra radiant heating and cooling

JOTUN Cool Shades. Impact of the TSR Value on the Users Comfort and the Energy Performance of Buildings. ai³ Werner Jager

Zero Energy Building Example in Estonia. Tõnu Mauring

Built examples and project certification. Zeno Bastian, Passive House Institute

Geothermal for Passive Houses

Future tree planting on the two acre lot will offset remaining lifetime carbon emissions.

Energy Audit. Project: ENergy Efficiency and Renewables SUPporting Policies in Local level for EnergY (ENER-SUPPLY) Work Package 4

4.2.3 MINERGIE ORIGIN AND ORGANISATION

Minimum Energy Consumption 84% energy heating savings*

27/10/15. Rod Hughes Architect Director 2030 architects ltd. Penrith

ISES EuroSun Quality management as a key for efficient building performance

ANNUAL ENERGY PERFORMANCE OF SOLAR THERMAL SYSTEMS IN BRAŞOV, ROMANIA

The Centre for Sustainable Building (ZUB) * A Case Study

Project Description. Projected build start date 02 Aug 2010 Projected date of occupation 03 Dec Existing external wall construction

Zero Energy House in Japan: Actual results and future target. Isamu Ohta Misawa Homes Institute of Research & Development CO., LTD.

Single family low energy house, Herselt, Belgium

ROLE OF ENGINEERS IN THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF BUILDINGS

Adaption of the passive house concept in northern Sweden - a case study of performance

Optimisation and Cost Analysis of a Lithium Bromide Absorption Solar Cooling System

Assignment 3 Integrated Energy Design

Work Package 2: Performance of naturally ventilated buildings

Achieving the nearly zero energy building concept - A study based on practical experience

1/60. Solar systems. solar system layouts heat demand collector area calculation

Student Modeling Competition

The reasons for this approach are different. So

Passivhaus Introduction

INTEGRAL BUILDING AND ENERGY DESIGN OF AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPARISON OF INITIAL DESIGN IDEAS WITH MONITORED RESULTS

Efficiency house. Building description

COMPARISON OF TWO PASSIVE HOUSE SCHOOLS IN NORWAY AND GERMANY

Dienstleistung. Certification as "Quality Approved Passive House" Criteria for Residential-Use Passive Houses

Torben Lundberg Architect m.a.a

Holistic Design Approach For Energy Efficiency ASHRAE TECHNOLOGY AWARD CASE STUDIES

Application technology, 5th edition. Volume III: Fonterra radiant heating and cooling

CASE STUDIES - CENTRE FOR SUSTAINABLE BUILDING (ZUB) KASSEL, GERMANY

Single family house in Herselt BE

PASSIVHAUS Designed for you to enjoy maximum comfort with minimum energy.

Next Generation District Heating

ReColor. The concept of the project

A prototype architecture for passive and plus energy building in Estonia

Sapporo Net-Zero Energy Home Hokkaido, Japan. Description. Setting. Super E Canadian Member. Super E Japanese Member. Super E Case Study

Energy Efficient Building Envelope Kiev,

NORTH AMERICAN MONITORING OF A HOTEL WITH ROOM SIZE GSHPS

SOLAR XXI: A Portuguese Office Building towards Net Zero-Energy Building

ISOVER Multi-Comfort House Students Contest Edition 2015 Residential function in cold climate Astana, Kazakhstan

Healthy Buildings 2017 Europe July 2-5, 2017, Lublin, Poland

OPERATION AND CONTROL OF THERMALLY ACTIVATED SLAB HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEMS

GEOTHERMAL DISTRICT HEATING EXPERIENCE IN TURKEY

Energy Audit. Project: ENergy Efficiency and Renewables SUPporting Policies in Local level for EnergY (ENER-SUPPLY) Work Package 4

from June 5 th, 2016 until June 10 th, 2016 Business Travel Program of the German Chambers of Commerce

German American Chamber of Commerce PRESENTATION ON NOVEMBER 6th, 2008 Axel Popp

Energy efficiency of buildings from Europe to Slovakia

Passive Houses Worlswide: International Developments

Bruck an der Mur. Project summary. Energy concept: Background for the renovation reasons

BEEP Guidelines for Energy Efficient Design of Multi-Storey Residential Buildings

ScienceDirect. Simulation based mixed mode building design

abridged report analysis of climate conditions in crawl spaces with high insulated wooden floor plates for the prevention of structural damages

Analysis of climate conditions in crawl spaces with high insulated wooden floor plates for the prevention of structural damages

Conversion Design of Solar Houses from Active to Passive

Potential of ventilative cooling in German residential buildings

BREEAM INTERNATIONAL NEW CONSTRUCTION PRODUCT DATA FOR CERTIFICATION URBANSCAPE GREEN ROOF SYSTEMS

TOP TEN 2018 O P T E. N s ENERGY EFFICIENCY PRACTICES FOR THE CHINA BUILDINGS SECTOR

Is it possible to build near zero energy single family buildings in very cold arctic climate?

546: High Altitude Design, Optimising Residential Architecture in the Alborz Mountains, Iran

PassiveDesign.org. Principles of Passive Design

A Comparative Study Of The Thermal Comfort By Using Different Building Materials In Gaza City (JERT)

House Pillon Year of construction (2008), Caldaro (IT)

Project name Gentoo Retrofit Bid 1 Project summary Refurbishment of 2no. Semi Detached houses using Passivhaus principles

Project name SOLAR HOUSE 80/50 Project summary

Energy Audit. Project: ENergy Efficiency and Renewables SUPporting Policies in Local level for EnergY (ENER-SUPPLY) Work Package 4

Apartment building Sodastraße 40 in Ludwigshafen, DE

Nearly Zero Energy Building in Lecco Modern technological building compared to an ancient Villa

ENERGY SAVING INNOVATION IN CHINESE TRADITIONAL BUILDINGS. L. Zhu Nanjing University of Technology China

Great Ocean Rd Ice Creamery

ENERGETIC MONITORING AND OPTIMIZATION OF A SOLAR HOUSE

Research on integrated solar and geothermal energy engineering design in hot summer and cold winter area

Chapter 7. Passive Solar Contents

Near zero energy building with steel solutions case study. Jyrki Kesti, Technology Director, Ruukki Construction

State Of The Art Office Building & Campus For Maharashtra Energy Development Agency(MEDA) At AUNDH, PUNE

REBUILDING A MASONRY/CONCRETE SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE FOR ECONOMICAL HEATING AND COMFORTABLE LIFE

Local project in Dublin - IRELAND

Semi-detached house in De Pinte, Belgium

Press Release. Zero Energy Building for Seoul. Fraunhofer ISE Leads Interdisciplinary Team and Develops Energy Concept

New developed solar thermal systems for heating and cooling Budapest, 16 th April 2009 Tsekouras Panagiotis Mech. Engineer NTUA Centre for Renewable

Microgeneration Installation Standard : MCS 024 SOLAR DOMESTIC HOT WATER ENERGY CALCULATION. to be used in conjunction with MIS 3001:

Energy Efficient Buildings in Germany An Introduction

Transcription:

Air conditioning of buildings by near-surface geothermal energy Print from the Structural Engineering Yearbook 2005 issued by Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI = Association of German Engineers) Dipl.-Ing. Edmond D. Krecké, Luxembourg 1. Starting position Nowadays, about 40 % of all energy raw materials such as crude oil, natural gas and coal are being used for air-conditioning purposes, i.e. for heating and cooling of buildings an unjustifiable luxury considering the fact that both ecologically friendly and economically useful alternatives are available. Despite a great variety of activities regarding the utilization of renewable energies the expenditure of primary energy for the manufacture of such systems and facilities as well as the initial costs for photo-voltaic installations, solar collectors or heat pumps are definitely still too high as compared with the energy savings achievable. Presented in this essay will be a technology for the air conditioning of buildings utilizing the ground underneath the building as a storage medium and the solar energy as an energy carrier. This Terra-Sol building technology will require but minimum amounts of current and constitutes an economical alternative to conventional heating and air-conditioning systems both in regard to manufacturing and operating costs and in addition to the aspects of conservation of nature and environmental protection which are becoming more and more important for future generations. 2. Energy concept The basic idea of the Terra-Sol building technology consists in that solar energy is collected via the shell of a building adjoining the surrounding air, i.e. via roofing and walls and that this thermal energy is stored in the ground underneath the building and in case of need will be used for heating and cooling as well as for ventilation and aeration of a building. Collection of the solar energy, feeding thereof into the ground as well as tempering of walls and roofing will be effected via concealed plastic piping installed in building components and/or in the ground and filled with water (see Figure 1). 1/12

Solar thermal gain Roof absorber piping Solar thermal gain: +15 to 75 C Roof absorber piping Solar thermal gain: +15 to 75 C AKK: Outside wall air conditioning and compensation system AKK: Outside wall air conditioning and compensation system Flow heater Cold water Distribution manifold Collector Room thermostat Cooling circuit I +7 C to +14 C for cooling outside walls in summer Boundary storage II +15 C to +24 C for heating outside walls Center storage III +25 C to +34 C for heating outside walls Core storage IV from +35 C For preheating of service water Center storage III +25 C to +34 C for heating outside walls Boundary storage II +15 C to +24 C for heating outside walls Cooling circuit I +7 C to +14 C for cooling outside walls in summer Geothermal gain Figure 1. Schematic diagram 2/12

Via the roof absorber piping the solar energy is collected by heating the water contained in said piping up to a temperature of +80 C and fed into the ground underneath the sole plate by means of insulated piping. The ground underneath the sole plate is diked laterally with insulation so as to serve as an efficient storage for the heat supplied. The storage is subdivided into different temperature zones by an appropriate control system. The core storage with temperatures above +35 C serves for preheating of the service water and the center and boundary storages with temperatures within the range of +15 C to +34 C serve for heating of the outside walls. A cooling circuit also conceivable outside of the building makes use of the relatively constant ground temperature of +7 C to +14 C and may be provided for cooling of the outside walls in summer. Apart from heating and/or cooling of walls and roofing, an additional aeration and ventilation of buildings by means of a Pipe-in-Pipe counterflow system is deemed useful. To this effect, the outgoing air from the rooms is dissipated in a larger-section pipe in one direction and the fresh air is supplied through a smaller pipe which is inserted in the larger-section pipe, in the opposite direction. In case of an adequate length of the two pipes heat exchange efficiencies in excess of 98% are achieved. The fresh air supplied through the pipe system is routed within the ground for heating and/or cooling as a function of outdoor temperatures. Figures 2 to 5 show examples of piping installations in the ground underneath the foundation slab as well as in and adjacent this sole plate and on the roof. Illustrated in Figure 6 is the erection of wall assembly units with integrated piping. Figure 7 shows the necessary control engineering restricted to two circulating pumps and several control valves. Figure 2. Pipe-in-Pipe counterflow system 3/12

Figure 3. Piping installation in a foundation slab prior to concrete work Figure 4. Cooling circuit piping installed adjacent a building Figure 5. Installation of solar absorber pipes on roof insulation boards 4/12

Figure 6. Assembling of large-size wall elements with integrated piping Figure 7. Control engineering for a single-family home 5/12

3. Energetic considerations 3.1 Look at a wall cross-section Compared hereinafter will be the transmission heat loss per m² wall area for a wall with integrated piping, i.e. the so-called temperature barrier, and the same type of wall, however without temperature barrier. The temperature data specified in the EnEV (German Ordinance Regulating Energy Savings) applicable for locations in Germany have been taken as a basis for determination of the transmission heat losses. The outer walls involved consist of a concrete core of 15 cm thickness into which the temperature barrier is integrated, with heat insulation (PS 15, SE 040) of 7,5 cm thickness each on the inside and outside; see Figure 8. In case of a conventional wall design the transmission heat loss will be determined via the temperature gradient from the inside to the outside and by the U-value for the entire wall cross-section. With a building component with temperature barrier water preheated by the ground storage is passed through piping integrated in the wall cross-section and through the solid wall "embedded in heat insulation both on the inner and the outer sides. The wall cross-section will be heated to approx. +14 C to +18 C depending on the temperature of ground storage. The transmission temperature loss will thus be determined only by the temperature gradient from the inside (indoor temperature according to EnEV +19 C, for instance) to the temperature barrier. In principle, the outside insulation will no longer play a role in relafrom inside: Plastering mortar PS 15, SE 040 Normal concrete 2400 PS 15, SE 040 WDV Final plaster coat (WDVS) U = 0,25 W/m²K Q T, inside Q T, outside Plastic piping filled with water = Temperature barriere (TB) Figure 8. Schematic diagram of the cross-section of outside walls involved 6/12

tion to the transmission heat loss provided sufficient energy will be supplied by the ground storage for maintaining the wall temperature. Herein, attention should be paid that the ground storage will be supplied with thermal energy by insolation via the roof absorbers also in winter. Initially illustrated in Diagram 1 is the transmission heat loss of the entire outer wall (U-value = 0,25) without temperature barrier (TB). Considering the TB with a water temperature of +14 C and/or +18 C a distinction was made between the inner wall portion (Q Ti ) taking into account the insulation of 7,5 cm thickness provided on the inside as well as the inner half of the concrete cross-section (up to the middle of temperature barrier TB = 7,5 cm) and the outer wall portion (Q Ta ) comprising the outer half of the concrete cross-section and the insulation of 7,5 cm thickness provided on the outside. The following formula applies for determination of the transmission heat loss of wall without temperature barrier (TB): Q T ~ U t wherein t = t i - t a For determination of the transmission heat losses of the inner and the outer wall portions the following formulas shall apply analogously (taking twice the U-value as a basis!) Q Ti ~ 2 U (t i - t B ) Q Ta ~ 2 U (t B - t a ) and the sum will be obtained as under: Q Ti + Q Ta ~ 2 U (t i - t a ) Thus, the transmission heat loss of the wall with temperature barrier as a whole is double that of the wall without temperature barrier. The loss in the outer wall portion is covered by the ground storage and "free of charge". Logically, the loss in the inner wall portion needs to be minimized by reduction of the difference t i - t B. With the temperature of temperature barrier increasing, the transmission heat losses are "shifted" from the inner wall portion to the outer wall portion so that mainly energy from the ground storage and less the energy from the rooms is being consumed. Would the temperature of the temperature barrier equal the internal temperature, t i = t B, then there would be no loss in the inner wall portion. The direct comparison between the wall without temperature barrier and the wall with temperature barrier = +18 C shows that the transmission heat losses Q Ti are reduced from 21,02 to 3,28 kwh/month per m² wall surface. This corresponds to a reduction of the heat demand for heating purposes by 81 % referred to the transmission heat losses of the outer wall. 7/12

The temperatures of temperature barrier by months and for the entire heating period assumed have been taken as constant for reasons of this calculated comparison only. In practice, the temperature will continuously be adapted and optimized as a function of the desired indoor temperatures and the prevailing outdoor temperatures; this will apply both to heating and cooling of the buildings. Diagram 1. Transmission heat losses of an outside wall without temperature barrier, with temperature barrier = +14 C and with temperature barrier = +18 C Mar May Oct Dec Sum without TB Q T kwh/month per m² 3,78 3,09 2,77 1,71 1,13 0,83 1,84 2,57 3,29 21,02 Q[kWh/Month] per m² 4,00 3,50 3,00 2,50 2,00 1,50 1,00 0,50 0,00 without Temperature barrier (TB) März Mai Okt Month Dez with TB = 14 C Q Ti Q Ta kwh/month per m² 1,86 5,69 1,68 4,50 Mar 1,86 3,68 1,80 1,62 May 1,86 0,41 1,66 0,00 Oct 1,86 1,82 1,80 3,35 Dec 1,86 4,72 Sum 16,24 25,80 Q[kWh/Month] per m² 6,00 5,00 4,00 3,00 2,00 1,00 0,00 with TB = 14 C QTi QTa März Mai Month Okt Dez with TB = 18 C Q Ti Q Ta kwh/month per m² 0,37 7,18 0,34 5,85 Mar 0,37 5,17 0,36 3,06 May 0,37 1,90 0,36 1,30 Oct 0,37 3,31 0,36 4,79 Dec 0,37 6,21 Sum 3,28 38,76 Q[kWh/Month] per m² 8,00 7,00 6,00 5,00 4,00 3,00 2,00 1,00 0,00 with TB = 18 C QTi QTa März Mai Month Okt Dez 8/12

3.2 Look at a single-family home When applying the considerations contained in the preceding section to a typical singlefamily home with basement, ground floor and garret storey with double pitch roof, the heat demand for heating purposes will be as shown in Diagram 2: Comparison of the conventional construction of a single-family home with the Terra-Sol building technology. The floor area of the building involved is 88 m² with the heated building volume amounting to 797 m³. In both cases, the building components as well as the boundary conditions not influenced by the Terra-Sol building technology have been taken as identical as a basis for the calculation. Components: Roof U-value = 0,18 W/m²K Windows and doors U-value = 1,40 W/m²K Window area portion 17 % Thermal bridges U-value flat rate allowance 0,05 W/m²K The wall cross-section shown in 3.1 with U = 0,25 W/m²K as well as a free ventilation with an air change rate of 0,7 h -1 have been taken as a rating basis for the conventional construction. In the calculation by the Terra-Sol building technology and with a U-value of 0,50 W/m²K "half" the wall cross-section with a constant temperature barrier temperature of +18 C as well as the Pipe-in-Pipe counterflow system with 96% - 98% heat recovery have been taken into consideration. Diagram 2 Comparison of heat demand for heating purposes Heat demand for heating of single-family house Qh [kwh] Qh [kwh] 4.000 3.500 3.000 2.500 2.000 1.500 Outside walls without TB Outside walls with TB = 18 C, WRG 1.000 500 0 Mar May Jun Jul Aug Oct Dec 9/12

Based on the parameters specified above, the heat demand for heating purposes in a singlefamily home is calculated as follows: Outside walls without temperature barrier Outside walls with temperature barrier = +18 C, WRG Q h = 15.488 kwh/a Q h = 4.412 kwh/a Referred to the building useful area A N = 255 m²: Outside walls without temperature barrier Outside walls with temperature barrier = +18 C, WRG Q h = 60,7 kwh/m²a Q h = 17,3 kwh/m²a Setting out from this calculation there can be verified that the annual heat demand for heating of a building with Terra-Sol building technology consisting of temperature barrier and Pipe-in-Pipe counterflow system is approximately equal to that of a passive house standard with an annual heat demand for heating purposes of q h = 15 kwh/m². Upon a closer look at this calculation there will be noted that the major portion of the annual heat demand for heating purposes is attributable to the high U-value related to the quality of windows and doors. Accordingly, a heat demand for heating purposes reduced further to approx. 10 kwh/m² and less will be achievable when using windows and doors with a lower U-value and applying the Terra-Sol building technology and conventional insulation thicknesses. Herein, attention should be paid that the costs for a Terra-Sol building are lower than those of a building of conventional construction inter alia due to the fact that great insulation thicknesses and expensive windows with an extremely low U-value are not necessary. 4. Examples and further development The Terra-Sol building technology has already been employed successfully in several countries such as Luxembourg, India and China. Diagram 3 shows a series of measurements over a period of four years with measurements of indoor temperature, outdoor temperature and the temperature prevailing in the ground storage of a single-family home. This building was constructed in Luxembourg in 2000 with a wall structure of light-weight concrete walls of 15 cm thickness with 7,5 cm insulation each on the inside and on the outside and with a floor area of 175 m² in case of 1 ½ storeys. The theoretical consider-ations are confirmed in an impressive manner by the measuring values obtained. 10/12

Diagram 3. Series of measurements for an exemplary building 30,0 Indoor temperature measuring point Temperature ( C) 25,0 20,0 15,0 1995 1996 1997 1998 20,0 15,0 10,0 Mar May Jun Jul Aug t Oct Outdoor temperature measuring point (min) Dec 1995 1996 1997 1998 Temperature ( C) 5,0 0,0-5,0 Mar May Jun Jul Aug Oct Dec -10,0-15,0-20,0 30,0 M easuring point, Center ground storage 25,0 Temperature C 20,0 15,0 1995 1996 1997 1998 10,0 Mar May Jun Jul Aug Oct Dec 11/12

The insulation thicknesses normal for this type of single-family home will be optimized further with a view to the solar heat gains. In case of a current project an insulation (WLG 040) of 5 cm each is provided on the inside and on the outside so that the absorption of solar energy via the outside walls is perceptible. In addition, a temperature barrier will also be installed within range of the roof areas which are relatively large as compared with the outside wall surfaces, so that comforting and controllable temperatures will be achievable via the temperature barrier also in rooms having no and/or very few outside walls. During construction of the building numerous measuring heads or probes will again be installed so as permit documentation by way of the measuring results as to how the reduced insulation thicknesses and the additional temperature barrier in the roofing influence the corresponding march of temperatures. 5. Prospects The advantages of the two approved processes of solar engineering and utilization of geothermal heat are combined in an amazingly simple form by the utilization of solar energy in connection with the near-surface geothermal energy. Many examples already realized in all climatic zones verify the efficiency of this system extremely favourable in regard to both manufacturing and operating costs. In order to optimize and also to be able to "calculate" this building technology, further research and development are necessary. The objectives of further investigations are to gain control of the calculation of heat exchange processes and to optimize insulation thicknesses. The experience already gained, however, permits an ecofriendly and economical application of the Terra-Sol building technology already today. 12/12