Environmental and Economic Considerations for Marcellus Natural Gas Development. Presented by Tom Murphy and Dave Yoxtheimer

Similar documents
WATER RESOURCES ISSUES RELATED TO SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT

Lifecycle Water Management Considerations & Challenges for Marcellus Shale Gas Development

Water Resource Management for Shale Energy Development

Water Issues Relating to Unconventional Oil and Gas Production

Shale Gas (D: unkonventionelles Erdgas )

Chapter 9. Water Sourcing and Wastewater Disposal for Marcellus Shale Development in Pennsylvania

Environmental Protection and Marcellus Shale Well Development. Scott Perry Director Bureau of Oil and Gas Management

Department of the Environment

3 rd Shale Play Water Management Marcellus and Utica COLLABORATION CASE STUDY

Drilling for Natural Gas in the Marcellus and Utica Shales: Environmental Regulatory Basics

Protecting Community Water Supplies

Water Availability and Management in Shale Gas Operations

NEMC Challenges of Managing Water in the Marcellus Play. Nick Inkenhaus Water Resources Engineer

The Opportunities, Challenges, and Unknowns of Shale Gas Exploration

Natural Gas Development in the Susquehanna River Basin. Jennifer Hoffman September 29, 2010 Pittsburgh, PA

Water Management Optimization

SHALE DRILLING. Linda Nicholson and Colleagues November 11, 2009

U.S. Historical and Projected Shale Gas Production

Chesapeake Energy. Shale Operations Overview

PEACE RIVER MANASOTA REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING December 5, 2018 ROUTINE STATUS REPORTS ITEM 1

ENERGY SLIDESHOW. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

ENERGY SLIDESHOW. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Resource Management Division Office of Oil, Gas, and Minerals

SHALE GAS EXTRACTION AND WATER CONSUMPTION IN NORTH CAROLINA: A PRIMER

Welcome to the MWON Advanced Webinar Series

AIChE: Natural Gas Utilization Workshop Overcoming Hurdles of Technology Implementation

For personal use only

We weren t planning to talk about it, but since you asked... CEE With special thanks to Dr. Brian Rahm of the NY State Water Resources Institute

Natural Gas from Shale: Potential Economic, Community, Environmental, and Health Implications

Energy & Water. Roland L. Moreau ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company NSF Energy-Water Nexus Workshop June 10-11, 2013 Alexandria, VA

Bakken Shale: Evolution of a Giant Oil Field

Where in New York are the Marcellus and Utica Shales??

Crestwood Overview Nationwide Footprint / Diverse Product Mix

Marcellus Shale Gas Academic Research

REDUCING THE FRESHWATER FOOTPRINT ASSOCIATED WITH SHALE OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT

Effective Water Management Strategies For Sustainable Growth. Karthik Viswanathan 8/22/14

Unconventional Shale Gas Development: Convergence of Economics, Technology, and Policy

Table of Contents See also Summary of Contents on the previous page.

Changes in the Quantity and Quality of Produced Water from Appalachian Shale Energy Development and their Implications for Water Reuse

Background 33 years at NYSDEC, last 22 as Division Director, Mineral Resources Vice President, Governmental Affairs, Spectra Environmental Group Princ

The Use of Electro-Coagulation Technology to Treat Hydrofracturing Flowback Water and Other Oil and Gas Field Wastewaters

Impacts of Permit-Exempt Wells

SHALE FACTS. Production cycle. Ensuring safe and responsible operations

Core Value. Unconventional Gas Production and Water Resources: Lessons from the U.S. Brisbane, Sydney & Canberra, Australia February 27 March 1, 2012

Gastem USA. Environmental Concerns, Mitigating Actions & Best Practices Otsego County, NY.

Evolution of Rail Related Energy Markets. The Energy Forum New York, NY March 18, 2013

What s the Story With Fracking?

Marcellus Shale Public Outreach Marcellus Shale Coalition 1 MARCELLUS SHALE COALITION

Oil and Gas Study. March 2 2, 2012

Application for Gas Exploration and Production

Water/Energy Sustainability Symposium 2010 Annual Forum Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania September 26-29, 2010

Comprehensive & Collaborative Plan to Assess the Environmental Effects of Marcellus Shale Gas Exploration & Production

THE MARCELLUS SHALE Powering America s Future, Thanks to Hydraulic Fracturing. Travis Windle

Shale Gas Report Ed 1, 2011

The Marcellus Shale Safe Drilling Initiative:

WATER AND SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT

J. Daniel Arthur, P.E., ALL Consulting. Author. Ground Water Protection Council January 2009 San Antonio, Texas. Presented at

A Day in the Life of a Barrel of Water.

Collection and Treatment of Flowback and Produced Waters from Hydraulic Fracturing. Edwin Pinero Veolia Water North America

Challenges For Produced Water Optimization In The Permian: An Analysis Of SWD Supply and Demand

Marcellus Shale Gas Well Development in New York State

Natural Gas Drilling: 101

WATER USED FOR HYDRAULIC FRACTURING: AMOUNTS, SOURCES, REUSE,

Crystallization A Viable and Green Solution to Industry s Wastewater Needs

Acceptance Natural Gas Demand to Stay High on Cold Weather Forecast

Briefing to House Environmental Matters Committee February 9, Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. Acting Secretary Maryland Department of the Environment

Where in New York are the Marcellus and Utica Shales??

Cumulative Risks of Shale Gas Development

DISCLAIMER. Presentation is not legal advice. Presentation is designed to advise the public on steps taken by Broome County

Trends, Issues and Market Changes for Crude Oil and Natural Gas

THE MARCELLUS SHALE AN ENERGY GAME

Water-use requirements associated with hydraulic fracturing within the Williston Basin

UGI ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

The role of water management in unlocking unconventional resources

Bryan Swistock Water Resources Extension Specialist Penn State University

Crystallization A Viable and Green Solution to Industry s Wastewater Needs

State Representative Mark Mustio Workforce and Community Impacts. Jon Laughner Marcellus Shale Team Penn State Cooperative Extension June 1, 2010

Winter U.S. Natural Gas Production and Supply Outlook

Assessing the Perceived and Real

Characterization of Marcellus Shale and Barnett Shale Flowback Waters and Technology Development for Water Reuse

City of San Clemente Water Usage Report

AADE Symposium 2011 Haynesville Shale. Presented by James R. Redfearn Vice President Drilling & Completions Mid Continent Region January 19, 2011

Winter U.S. Natural Gas Production and Supply Outlook

Pennsylvania Economic Development Association Bob Garland Universal Well Services October 26, 2010

The Woodford Shale. Presenter Name: Sam Langford

Hydraulic Fracturing. Sustainable Development Initiatives. Greg Manuel Senior Staff Engineer Sustainable Development November 12, 2013

Considerations for hydraulic fracturing and groundwater and surface water protection: lessons learned in the U.S.

SAMPLE. US Shale. Insight Report

Helis St Tammany Energy Project

NASEO WINTER ENERGY OUTLOOK

Evaluation of Abandoned Mine Drainage as a water supply for hydraulic fracturing

Facts of Myths of the Marcellus Shale: A Scientific Perspective

Environmentally Friendly Drilling Systems Program

New Data Show Methane in Pennsylvania Water Wells Unrelated to Hydraulic Fracturing

Shale gas & Hydraulic fracturing. Dr. Jürg M. Matter Ocean & Earth Science University of Southampton

The Really Big Game Changer: Crude Oil Production from Shale Resources and the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale

Water Management Barnett Shale November 21, 2008

Water Management Planning for Unconventional Resource Development


Transcription:

Environmental and Economic Considerations for Marcellus Natural Gas Development Presented by Tom Murphy and Dave Yoxtheimer 1

Presentation Topics Marcellus Geology Water Management Hydrofracturing Process Environmental Challenges Economic Considerations Infrastructure 2

US Shale Gas Plays 3

4

5

GEOLOGIC FACTORS CONTROLLING SHALE GAS PROJECT SUCCESS 1. THICKNESS 2. MATURITY 3. GAS CONTENT 4. ROCK PROPERTIES (SILICA CONTENT) 4. AREAL EXTENT 5. DEPTH 6. STRUCTURAL COMPLEXITY 7. LATERAL CONTINUITY 6

Where are Wells Being Drilled

Site Construction

Construction

Groundwater Protection

Groundwater/Pad Protections

Start of Drilling

Madden 2H Well Site in Operation

Hydraulic Fracturing Process

Water Use Data in Susquehanna Basin Total water use: 716.0 million gallons (6/1/08 to 5/21/10) 209.2 mgal from public water supply (29%) 506.8 mgal from surface water sites (71%) Average total volume of fluid used per well: 3.3 mgal/well 2.8 million gallons of fresh water (85%) 0.5 million gallons or reused flowback (15%) Average recovery of flowback: 10.0% (30 day) Total amount of flowback reused or sent to disposal Reuse 44.1 million gallons Disposal 21 million gallons 16

Hydrofracturing Fluid Composition 17

Water Supply Considerations Number of factors to consider: Access to water near the drilling project area (public vs. self supply) Proximity to well site: piping vs. trucking Availability-seasonal or perennial Will pass-by flows be required? Water quality Drilling schedule vs. permitting schedule Permitting complexity 18

Storage options: Centralized impoundment Single paddedicated impoundment Frac tanks Storage based on ultimate scale of operations (long vs. short term) Water Storage 19

Flowback Water Management Raw, untreated flowback from a Marcellus gas well Treated flowback ready for reuse Filtration treatment 20

Underground Injection Wells Currently 7 injection wells in PA Limited injection capacity Difficult to permit Difficult to find target injection reservoirs Prone to plugging 22

New Treatment Standards Any facility that will have a total dissolved solids TDS discharge of > 2000 mg/l will need to install advanced treatment for the following: TDS-500 mg/l Chlorides-250 mg/l New facilities must meet these standards by January 1, 2011. 23

Environmental Concerns Excessive water withdrawals Stray methane migration Flowback/frac chemical spills Forest fragmentation (pads and pipelines) Erosion and sedimentation Excess truck traffic Air quality 24

How big is the Marcellus Shale? now estimated that potential recoverable gas could be 489 trillion cu. ft. w/current technology. -Increases over time?? -Current production # s 100+ year supply World class resource Decades to drill/produce Proximity/transport

Production Data Graphic: The Scranton Times Tribune

Marcellus vs. Barnett Shale Comparison Best County Shale Production Comparison: 7/1/09 to 6/30/10 County # Wells Ave. Prod Daily Ave Months (mcf/d) Bradford, PA* 84 6 3,436 Tarrant, TX* 490 6 1,666 Marcellus exceeds Barnett by: 1,770 CHK s Clapper 2H in Susquehanna County, has produced about 2.8 BCF in only 270 days. By contrast, the top-producing Barnett well has produced about 5.1 BCF in five years. That means the Clapper 2H is producing gas at approx. three times the rate* *Analysis from Powell Barnett Shale Newsletter 9/13/10

Marcellus Shale Economics ~70+ energy companies looking at Marcellus and increasing $8 Billion+ collectively -$55B by 2014 ~ Royalties to PA landowners $250 billion? --Variable lease rates -$750 to $6500/ac --$14K+ between companies --Some selling other assets to reposition here --Large companies consolidating --International interest. --Lowest cost shale?? Other shales??

Permits & Wells Drilled (thru 9/8/10)

Bradford County Permit Applications Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 2008 0 0 1 2 16 3 2 3 3 14 36 21 101 2009 33 40 3 21 86 31 9 33 38 57 54 23 429 2010 53 117 92 88 66 81 1 500

PA Rig Counts 92 rigs as of 9-10-10 vs. 54 rigs on 9-11-09 September 10, 2010

Bradford Co Pipeline Development

ROW Acquisition and Pipeline --early estimates of 10K miles of gathering lines needed for Marcellus --345 already built in Bradford alone to date. --estimated 100K of disturbed acres --other shales?? --water access points --road access --centralized ponds --other ROWs --NGL to East Coast for transport to Gulf --also Midwest & Canada

Thank y0u! Questions? 34