Utah State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering CEE 3430 Engineering Hydrology Test 2. Date: 3/31/2014

Similar documents
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

Runoff Hydrographs. The Unit Hydrograph Approach

Module 3. Lecture 6: Synthetic unit hydrograph

Drainage Analysis. Appendix E

Engineering Hydrology. Class 16: Direct Runoff (DRO) and Unit Hydrographs

5/11/2007. WinTR-55 for Plan Reviewers Small Watershed Hydrology Hydrology Terms and Definitions

RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL NORTH ASH MANAGEMENT UNIT MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

Engineering Hydrology Class 3

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT BOWEN ASH POND 1 (AP-1) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Peak discharge computation

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Stormwater Review Part 2. Rainfall and Runoff. Tom Seybert, PE and Andy Bennett, PE. Pennsylvania Surveyors Conference 2019

Examination of PRZM5.0 Storm Rainfall Depth and Distribution Algorithms Compared to Current U.S. Storm Trends

Modeling the Hydrologic Impacts of Control Structures Utilizing LiDAR, ICPR, and GIS Technologies

Cumulative Precipitation

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND B (AP-B ) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Rainfall, Runoff and Peak Flows: Calibration of Hydrologic Design Methods for the Kansas City Area

MODULE 1 RUNOFF HYDROGRAPHS WORKSHEET 1. Precipitation

Autumn semester of Prof. Kim, Joong Hoon

Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California

CEE3430 Engineering Hydrology

Module 3. Lecture 4: Introduction to unit hydrograph

CEE6400 Physical Hydrology

Runoff Processes. Daene C. McKinney

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

1. Stream Network. The most common approach to quantitatively describing stream networks was postulated by Strahler (1952).

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

CHAPTER 3 STORMWATER HYDROLOGY. Table of Contents SECTION 3.1 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING STORMWATER RUNOFF

HYDROLOGY WORKSHEET 1 PRECIPITATION

CVEN 339 Summer 2009 Final Exam. 120 minutes allowed. 36 Students. No curve applied to grades. Median 70.6 Mean 68.7 Std. Dev High 88 Low 24.

FAST WATER / SLOW WATER AN EVALUATION OF ESTIMATING TIME FOR STORMWATER RUNOFF

Computation of excess stormflow at the basin scale. Prof. Pierluigi Claps. Dept. DIATI, Politecnico di Torino

Pre-Treatment Bioretention Cells Bioswales IOWA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL DECEMBER 16, 2015

Section 2: Hydrology. Introduction. What is the Return Period? Intensity-Duration-Frequency Data. Generating a runoff hydrograph 85 Minutes

INITIAL INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT MCMANUS ASH POND A (AP-1) 40 CFR

Design of Stormwater Wetlands

HERPIC County Storm Drainage Manual

Basic Hydrology Runoff Curve Numbers

HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC TABLES AND CURVES

Introduction to Hydrology, Part 2. Notes, Handouts

DETENTION BASIN DESIGN USING RATIONAL HYDROGRAPHS

Comparison of Green-Ampt and Curve Number Infiltration Methods in a single-gauged Brazilian watershed

5/11/2007. WinTR-55 for Plan Reviews Small Watershed Hydrology Overview

Ponds Planning, Design, Construction

Hydrologic Engineering Center Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) Sunil KUMAR Director, National Water Academy

Stream hydrographs. Stream hydrographs. Baseflow. Graphs of river stage or discharge at a single location as a function of time

Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan

Effect of Land Surface on Runoff Generation

Detention Pond Design Considering Varying Design Storms. Receiving Water Effects of Water Pollutant Discharges

CE 585. Construction Site Erosion Control. The University of Alabama. Tuscaloosa, AL. New Chevrolet and Cadillac Dealership.

Modeling catchment scale infiltration

STORMWATER HYDROLOGY

Design Guide for Vegetative Filter Strips Using VFSMOD

Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering. Department of Civil Engineering. Hydrology and Hydraulics. Final Exam, April 21, 2017

LID PLANTER BOX MODELING

What is runoff? Runoff. Runoff is often defined as the portion of rainfall, that runs over and under the soil surface toward the stream

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

Rational Method Hydrological Calculations with Excel COURSE CONTENT

Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan

NRCS Hydrology methodology review Minnesota NRCS recommendation MnDOT recommendation Using Atlas 14 with HydroCAD

iswm TM Technical Manual Hydrology:

0.0. Pervious CN = 40. (Unconnected impervious) (Total impervious) Total impervious area (percent) Composite CN

BMP Design Aids. w w w. t r a n s p o r t a t i o n. o h i o. g o v. Equations / Programs

Module 3: Rainfall and Hydrology for Construction Site Erosion Control

Overview of NRCS (SCS) TR-20 By Dr. R.M. Ragan

Stormwater Retention Pond Recovery Analysis

Precipitation Surface Cover Topography Soil Properties

March 9, 09 Syracuse, NY

APPENDIX K OPERATIONS AND FINAL COVER SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DESIGN

Stormwater Management Impacts Resulting from the Volumetric Abstraction of Runoff from Frequent Storms per PADEP CG-1. Geoffrey A. Cerrelli 1, P.E.

WinTR-55 Small Watershed Hydrology

WMS Tools For Computing Hydrologic Modeling Parameters

CIVE22 BASIC HYDROLOGY Jorge A. Ramírez Homework No 7

Hydrology for Drainage Design. Design Considerations Use appropriate design tools for the job at hand:

Runoff Calculations. Time of Concentration (T c or t c ) from one location to another within a watershed. Travel

Technical Memorandum

ATTACHMENT 6 WATER QUALITY SWALE DESIGN ADDENDUM

North Omaha Ash Landfill Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan

Hydrologic Calibration:

Stormwater Management Standards for Pennsylvania. Another. A presentation from The Other Side of the Table

Hydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis

Table of Contents CHAPTER. Chapter 2 Hydrologic Analysis. 2.1 Estimating Runoff

Tom Ballestero, Rob Roseen, James Houle, Tim Puls, Federico Uribe, Josh Briggs

MIDAS CREEK PROJECT. FINAL DESIGN REPORT SKR Hydrotech 4/11/2012

Names: ESS 315. Lab #6, Floods and Runoff Part I Flood frequency

NC2 Ash Disposal Area Run-on and Run-off Control System Plan

Runoff Volume: The Importance of Land Cover

IBS Site Drainage: Senior Design Project

DRAINAGE PLAN OF NAU S EASTBURN EDUCATION AND GAMMAGE BUILDINGS FINAL PROPOSAL

PARAMETERS FOR THE GREEN-AMPT LOSS-RATE FUNCTION FOR SELECT TEXAS WATERSHEDS. AMIT KARKI, B.E. A THESIS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING

EART 204. Water. Dr. Slawek Tulaczyk. Earth Sciences, UCSC

APPENDIX IV. APPROVED METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN (NORTH ORANGE COUNTY)

Technical Memorandum

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING

Chapter 3 THEORY OF INFILTRATION. 3.1 General

Transcription:

Utah State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering CEE 3430 Engineering Hydrology Test 2. Date: 3/31/2014 D.G. Tarboton Time: 50 min 45 Points Open Book. Answer all questions. Please answer on this paper. Attach additional working sheets if necessary. You may refer to the textbook, notes, solutions to homework and any other written or printed reference material that you have brought with you. Calculator use. You may use a programmable calculator or equivalent calculating device (e.g. calculator functionality on a phone). You should limit the use of the calculating device to the performance of calculations. You may use programs that you have written to evaluate quantities commonly used in this class (e.g. infiltration quantities). Computer use. You may use a laptop computer to access an electronic version of the textbook. You may use a program such as Excel, Smath studio or R to perform calculations. You may not send emails or messages or communicate in any way with anyone other than the instructor or moderator regarding solutions to these questions. Even when using a calculator or computer you should write your work out on your solution paper as you will only be graded based on what you write down. Even when the answer is correct, you need to show how you got it. For partial credit in cases where the solution is not correct I need to see how you were approaching the problem. Page 1 of 7

1. For each of the following pictures that have been shown in class state what they show and what their hydrologic significance is. A. What: Hydrologic Significance: Page 2 of 7

B. What: Hydrologic Significance: Page 3 of 7

C. From NOAA Atlas 2 http://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hdsc/pf_documents/atlas2_volume5.pdf. What: Hydrologic Significance: Page 4 of 7

2. Consider the Green-Ampt infiltration model Following are the parameters determined from some soil testing Porosity = 0.42 Effective porosity θe = 0.4 Initial moisture content θi = 0.15 Hydraulic conductivity K = 0.7 cm/h Wetting front suction = 14 cm Assume ho=0. a) Determine the depth of the wetting front L when 2 cm of water has infiltrated. b) Determine the potential infiltration rate with the wetting front at this depth. c) In a rainstorm with continuously ponded conditions at the surface, how long would it take for the wetting front to penetrate to the depth L determined in (a). Page 5 of 7

3. In a problem similar to Mays 8.8.1 in Homework 8 you have been given a SCS Triangular Unit Hydrograph for a watershed with the following properties. Area = 4000 acres Length = 14250 ft Slope = 4% CN = 85 tp = 1.26 hr tr = 0.25 hr tc = 1.88 hr tb = 3.36 hr Unit precipitation excess 1 inch The person giving you this information neglected to provide a y-axis for the graph or to give you the unit hydrograph peak flow value. SCS Triangular Unit Hydrograph 0 1 2 3 4 Hours Conversions: 1 acre = 43560 ft 2. 1 mi = 5280 ft. 1 ft = 12 inches. 1 hr = 3600 s. a) Determine the peak discharge of the triangular unit hydrograph given above in ft 3 /s per inch of excess precipitation. b) Consider a storm in which the precipitation is 0.75 inches in 30 minutes. Determine the excess precipitation in inches. Page 6 of 7

c) Determine the peak of the resulting storm hydrograph in ft 3 /s. There is no baseflow. [5 points] Page 7 of 7