Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

Similar documents
Excellence in Experts, Efficiency and Service

DL Engineering Inc. Structural / Civil Engineering

DISTRESS PHENOMENA OFTEN MISTAKEN FOR FOUNDATION MOVEMENT

Sparks Engineering, Inc. S T R U C T U R A L E V A L U A T I O N, D E S I G N A N D T E S T I N G

DISTRESS PHENOMENA OFTEN MISTAKENLY ATTRIBUTED TO FOUNDATION MOVEMENT

Moonlight Architecture, Inc. Architecture Interior Design Site Planning

National Property Inspections

OAK RUN BUILDING PERMIT

Insurance Risk Services 104 South Park Ave. Sanford, FL Phone Fax:

Property Condition Assessment

CONDITION OF PROPERTY SURVEY Structural Integrity of Framing.

House. Diagram 1. Dimensions D = E = X = Y1 = Y2 = Z = Street D. Rear. property boundary. (distance from house to accessory building)

REQUEST FOR ALTERATION REVIEW COPPERLEAF PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

ACCESSORY BUILDING. Building Permit Requirements: (must be completed before submitting application)

Building Permit Checklist

RESIDENTIAL GARAGE AND DRIVEWAY

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT OBSERVATION REPORT

COMMERCIAL OR RESIDENTIAL NEW BUILDINGS, REMODELS AND ADDITIONS

AN OFFERING OF 1661 EAST OGLETHORPE HIGHWAY FLEMINGTON, LIBERTY COUNTY, GEORGIA PRESENTED BY WHITLEY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

ARTICLE III. TECHNICAL CODES AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS* Sec Adoption of the Florida Building Code and Countywide Amendments.

LakeRidge Subdivision Design / Architectural Standards


Exterior Elevated Elements Inspection Guidelines

HomeTeam Inspection Service 6550 Concord Beaumont, Texas (fax) Defective Drywall Inspection Report

PHASE 1 Foundation & Drainage New Construction Phased Inspection Report John & Mary Doe 5237 Clinton Street, Denver, CO 80238

EXHIBIT "B-1" DESIGN GUIDELINES SUBDIVISION DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MELTON RIDGE

Eidem Farm Brooklyn Park, MN

VILLAGE OF SHAWNEE HILLS 9484 Dublin Rd. Shawnee Hills, Ohio Phone Fax

WOODFORD COUNTY BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM OWNERS NAME & ADDRESS: PHONE #:

April 10, Mr. Steven McMahon Manager of Architectural Services East Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. 500 Volvo Parkway Chesapeake, VA 23320

Rafter J Ranch. Packet for New Residential Construction Including Additions and Alterations

Inspection Report. Prepared for: Gil Turiel. Property Address: 545 Briar Run Court Loganville, GA Date: July 17, 2011

KORA_Req._for_Eng._Studies_on_Stouffer_Apts. KU Reference No

Floyd Elementary & Willis Elementary Schools Draper Aden Associates Project No. R15682R-01

ARB Guidelines for approval of Detached Garage designs in Ashborough East

Inspection Report. Prepared for: Yossi Berg. Property Address: 4925 Diggers Way Sugar Hill, GA. Date: July 20, 2011

Fence and Wall Requirements

MARBELLA IN OCEANSIDE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION

CITY OF HAGERSTOWN PLANNING & CODE ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT. Submittal Requirements

Structural Assessment Live Fire Training Building. FSCJ South Campus Jacksonville, Florida. Florida State College at Jacksonville

City of Walnut Creek Development Review Services 1666 N. Main Street, Walnut Creek, CA (925) phone (925) fax

NEW SINGLE-FAMILY, MAJOR MODIFICATION, AND ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT Submittal Checklist

CITY OF TROY, MISSOURI Building Permit Application. Type of Permit: Residential Commercial. Company: Contact person: Address # Street Name:

RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION New Dwellings and Additions

TOWN OF ROTTERDAM RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Ext. 395 Needed to Obtain Permit:

A Sample Report On The Conditions At:

Building Inspection Report

County of Santa Barbara, California Facility Condition Assessment 2014

BUILDING PERMIT INFORMATION GUIDE FOR THE HOMEOWNER

RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION ( MINIMUM Building Requirements-Page 6)

Re.: Dollar Tree D10236 Startown Crossing, Newton, NC Structural Report on Findings, Site Visit (September 21, 2016)

Post-Frame Construction and the International Building Code By Amanda Stauffer

Providence Corner HOA Upper Providence Township, Pennsylvania

PROFESSIONAL OFFICE SUITES FOR LEASE PRIYA PROFESSIONAL OFFICE CENTRE 122 CANAL STREET POOLER, CHATHAM COUNTY, GEORGIA 31322

Residential Uses in the Historic Village Core

SUMMARY OF AREAS REQUIRING FURTHER EVALUATION

Wildwood Home Owners Association Architectural Review Board Guidelines

Site Investigation Report

Development Advisory - 40 March 21, 2018

Building Permit Application

JAY E. BUTLER, being first duly sworn deposes and states as follows: 1. I am a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of New York.

The Park at Willow Creek

Solar Photovoltaic System Permit

Alabama Home Inspections

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BENT TREE OF ROGERS

Full Reserve Study SAMPLE ASSOCIATION. City, WA 5/1/2010. Report #1234

SAMPLE REPORT Location:

STRUCTURAL EVALUATION

The Homeowner s Building Application Checklist for Constructing a Residential Addition

PIERCE POINTE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE GUIDELINES Post Office Box 930 Suwanee, Georgia 30024

Sierra Highlands Community Association

SUBDIVISION DESIGN GUIDELINES WREN CREEK PHASE II-A STONEBRIDGE RANCH

Natrona County Development Department 200 North Center Street, Room 205 Casper, WY Phone: Fax:

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANS, GRADING AND/OR DRAINAGE PLANS, LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PLANS, AND WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE PLANS

TOWN OF ROTTERDAM BUILDING DEPARTMENT RESIDENTIAL ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURE PERMIT APPLICATION Ext 395

HARRISBURG ESTATES OWNERS ASSOCIATION DESIGN STANDARDS REQUEST FOR APPROVAL FORM

THANK YOU WE APPRECIATE YOUR BUSINESS!

REQUEST FOR ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND HOA APPROVAL - PHEASANT WALK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

Inspection Report. Riverpark Place Condominium Complex S. Riverside Dr. Tulsa, Oklahoma. For

PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS NEW SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING

FAIRA TRANSPARENCY REPORTS Federal Ave E, Seattle, WA September 22, 2017

BUILDING REPORT. 123 Anywhere Street Suburb City. Prepared for: Client NON INVASIVE

RIVERS EDGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES

INSPECTION TYPE EIFS system, Visual, Tramex & Delmhorst probe moisture readings

CONSERVATION DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

Inspection Report. Property Address:

1. Complete Building Permit Application forms on page 2. Include septic system design approval from the Washington County Health Department.

20 North Main Alpine, UT (Phone) (Fax) SITE PLAN

Real Property Acquisition Loss Control Checklist

SUBDIVISION DESIGN GUIDELINES TIMBER CROSSING STONEBRIDGE RANCH FOR. Revised 3/ I 0/00

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

Two complete sets of plans that are legible and drawn to conventional scale are required to be submitted with the Building Permit Application Form.

Accessory Structures- 430 Third Street Garages Farmington, MN (651) Information Sheet

Moisture Survey Inspection Report

SUBDIVISION DESIGN GUIDELINES

KINGS MILL Builder Guidelines

Storm Damage Repair Requirements

MALVERN OF MADISON CONSTRUCTION RULES AND GUIDELINES

Structural Condition Assessment

HILLTOP RETAIL CENTER GLENDALE HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS

Transcription:

Registered Engineering Firm (F: 9334) Phone: 214-577-1077 Fax: 214-224-0549 Website: www.lighthouseeng.com Email: Office@LighthouseEng.com Thursday, September 04, 2014 TO: Our Client RE: Initial Engineering Evaluation Foundation Performance Anywhere in North Texas The following report constitutes the engineering opinion requested on the foundation of the subject residence. This report has been prepared in general accordance with the requirements of a Level B survey as defined by the Texas Chapter of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and the Texas Board of Professional Engineers (http://texasce.affiniscape.com/associations/10803/files/repairguidelines.pdf). This report is provided for the exclusive use of the person or persons this report was prepared for as shown above. We have no contractual relationship with, or obligation to, any party other than the party for whom this report was prepared. The purpose of this inspection was to evaluate the foundation and determine what, if any, foundation repairs are necessary. The foundation was visually inspected and a floor elevation survey was performed. The opinions contained herein are based on the experience and judgment of the writer, as well as conditions observed without taking soil samples, performing plumbing leak tests, removing floor or wall coverings, or performing invasive tests or procedures. The opinions offered herein are based solely on the observations made at the time of the inspection, and do not take into consideration any changes in the condition of the foundation after that date. This report does not predict or warrant the future performance of the subject foundation. You are encouraged to review the Agreements and Limitations attached to the end of this report for other important limitations and standard recommendations. Observations This structure is a two - story wood framed structure with brick veneer and siding on the exterior. The home has a hip roof and composition shingles. The interior walls are drywall with various finishes over the drywall. The foundation is a concrete slab-on-ground. The home was constructed in 1992 per the Tarrant County Appraisal District Records. All directions in this report are annotated by left, right, front and rear as if looking at the front door. 2014 Lighthouse Engineering 214-577-1077 Page 1 of 6

Observations and Discussions 1. Jason Conklin, Engineer (under the direct supervision of Mike Gandy, PE) physically inspected the above referenced residence to make an evaluation of the current foundation performance and to offer recommendations for repair, if needed. I performed a Level B engineering analysis as defined by the Texas Chapter of the ASCE. I made careful observations of the interior and exterior for signs of drainage and foundation distress. I performed an interior elevation survey denoted below and as shown on Drawing No. 1001. 2. This inspection was performed for the prospective buyer of the property. The home is listed on the real estate market. Photo 1: General view of the front of the home. 3. This engineer inspected the subject property after a rainfall event. The drainage around the home appeared to be adequate and no standing water was identified. 4. The home is situated on a cut and fill lot with the ground sloping from rear to front and right to left generally. Photo 2: View along the left side of the home. 5. Large mature trees were identified in the front yard. These trees do not appear to be directly affecting the performance of the home s foundation at this time. 2014 Lighthouse Engineering 214-577-1077 Page 2 of 6

Photo 3: Large mature trees identified in the front yard. 6. Minor brickwork separations were identified around the exterior of the home. These separations appeared to be due to thermal expansion in the home s framing and seasonal movement in the home s foundation. These separations are not indicative of significant foundation movement and no structural repairs are recommended at this time. Photos 4-8: Minor brickwork separations identified. 2014 Lighthouse Engineering 214-577-1077 Page 3 of 6

7. There were very minor indications of foundation movement throughout the interior of the home. Most doors were acceptably square in their frames. Most separations appeared to be due to normal seasonal movement in the home s foundation and framing. 8. It is recommended to maintain a more than normal watering program in the dry months of the year to prevent the soil around the home from drying and cracking. Especially along the front garage portion of the home s foundation. Interior Elevation Survey Interior floor elevations were taken with a Technidea Pro-2000 Ziplevel. Elevations were recorded to the nearest 0.1-inch throughout the home. A benchmark of was established in the center of the home and is shown on Drawing No. 1001 with a star. An adjustment was made for floor coverings if they were a different elevation than the floor covering at the benchmark location. Elevation differentials varied by a maximum of 0.4 vertical inches in seven (7) horizontal feet. It should be noted that the elevation measurements include effects of elevation variation in the original construction which normally are 0.6 inches to 1.0 inches. A sketch of the house with the elevations is attached as Drawing No. 1001. Conclusions An elevation survey was performed on the home and the cosmetic damage was reviewed to evaluate the performance of the foundation. The soil where the home is located has high shrink swell capacity. This soil can heave or settle depending on the moisture content in the soil. Some minor movement of the exterior driveways and sidewalks should be expected. Reviewing the elevation survey, the home does not have any slopes in the foundation that are above acceptable tolerances for slope. There are no foundation repairs recommended, at this time. Some minor movement of the foundation has occurred since the home was built. The amount of movement is within acceptable tolerance as foundations are designed to allow for minor movement. In conclusion, the home does not need any leveling performed on the home as it is within acceptable slope tolerance. The foundation of the home is performing within performance tolerances, no foundation repairs are recommended. 2014 Lighthouse Engineering 214-577-1077 Page 4 of 6

Recommendations 1. Maintain a more than normal watering program in the dry months of the year to prevent the soil around the home from drying and cracking. If soaker hoses are used, place the soaker hoses 1 2 away from the foundation and run for 30 60 minutes every other day as needed. Do not over water the foundation; this can be as detrimental as under watering. 2014 Lighthouse Engineering 214-577-1077 Page 5 of 6

Agreements and Limitations Use of this report for any reason implies consent to all agreements and limitations of this report. This report is the professional opinion of Lighthouse Engineering, LLC and is based upon a limited evaluation of the property. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the addressee. We have no contractual relationship with, or obligation to, any party other than the addressee of this report. This report does not constitute a structural warranty or performance contract with the purchaser of this report to or with any other party. It only states conditions observed at the time of the inspection. The evaluation of the property included a visual examination of the exposed interior and exterior finishes of the structure and the ground surfaces adjacent to the structure and to the taking of relative floor elevations. The taking and testing of soil samples was not included. Unless written in the report, the original design drawings and any design conditions were not known. Determination of construction to Building Code is best done during the original construction and is not a part of this evaluation. Testing for plumbing leaks was not performed but is recommended after foundation work is performed. It is possible that future repairs could be required for the subject foundation. This evaluation only addresses the current condition of the foundation. Lighthouse Engineering, LLC does not offer or imply any warranty for the repairs or for the repair company s acts or omissions or for any other person conducting the repairs. The fee collected is for this inspection only. Additional engineering services are available at an additional cost. Requests for these services must be made in a timely manner before commencement of work. Please contact this office for additional inspection scheduling and fee arrangements. Sincerely, Michael Gandy, P.E. 9/4/2014 Registered Engineering Firm F-9334 2014 Lighthouse Engineering 214-577-1077 Page 6 of 6

THIS REPORT DOES NOT PREDICT OR WARRANT THE FUTURE PERFORMANCE OF THE FOUNDATION NON-MONO - - F/P 0.4 0.1 0.4 - - -0.1-0.4 MONO GAR DATE Lighthouse Engineering BENCHMARK ELEVATION 0 INCHES ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN IN TENTHS OF AN INCH Michael Gandy, P.E. Phone: 214-577-1077 E-Mail: MikeGandy@LighthouseEng.com Registered Engineering Firm F-9334