USE OF REMOTE RODENT MONITORING WITH REGARD TO FOOD SAFETY REGULATIONS AND CURRENT PEST CONTROL PRACTICES

Similar documents
Remote Monitoring Systems (RMS)- Pros and Cons

OUR SOLUTIONS. SafetyChain is a Quality Management. System (QMS) that helps food. and beverage companies improve

SQF 2000 Code. 6th Edition AUGUST A HACCP-Based Supplier Assurance Code for the Food Manufacturing and Distributing Industries

FSC36 SAFE FEED/SAFE FOOD GUIDANCE DOCUMENT

How to Automate a FSMA-Ready Food Safety Plan

Pest Control. Introduction

Food Regulatory Guide

Reducing Risks and Reaping Rewards

Dr. Ramakrishnan Nara Perry Johnson Registrars Food Safety Inc., (PJRFSI, USA)

QM Management of Pests and Vermin

CONSULTATION SERVICES

Perspective. Supply Chain Management (SQM) Risk Assessing Your Supply Chain

The IFSQN FSSC Implementation Package

Choosing the Right Food Safety Program A Primer on Food Safety Audit and Certification Options

PART III - L PRODUCTION OF (BIO) CHEMICALS

ON THE SAFE SIDE: THE ROLE OF ERP IN FOOD AND BEVERAGE SAFETY COMPLIANCE

Springfield, Illinois June 18 20, 2015

BRC Storage and Distribution Quality and Safety Management System Implementation Workbook

GFSI BENCHMARKING REQUIREMENTS GFSI Guidance Document Version 7.1 PART III - EIII PROCESSING OF ANIMAL AND PLANT PERISHABLE PRODUCTS (MIXED PRODUCTS)

GFSI BENCHMARKING REQUIREMENTS GFSI GUIDANCE DOCUMENT VERSION 7.2 PART III - EI PROCESSING OF ANIMAL PERISHABLE PRODUCTS

GFSI BENCHMARKING REQUIREMENTS GFSI Guidance Document Version 7.2 PART III - EI PROCESSING OF ANIMAL PERISHABLE PRODUCTS

PART III - EI PROCESSING OF ANIMAL PERISHABLE PRODUCTS

SQF Food Safety Code for Manufacture of Food Packaging

BRC Packaging Management System Implementation Workbook

HACCP audit checklist

WHITE PAPER. Food Safety, From Farm to Fork. A Best-Practice Approach to Implementing a Food Safety Management System

PART III - L PRODUCTION OF (BIO) CHEMICALS

Overview dashboard Updates (Live feed) My Actions

GFSI BENCHMARKING REQUIREMENTS GFSI Guidance Document Version 7.1 PART III - D PRE-PROCESSING HANDLING OF PLANT PRODUCTS

PART III - EII PROCESSING OF PLANT PERISHABLE PRODUCTS. GFSI BENCHMARKING REQUIREMENTS GFSI Guidance Document Version 7.1

GFSI BENCHMARKING REQUIREMENTS GFSI Guidance Document Version 7.1 PART III - EI PROCESSING OF ANIMAL PERISHABLE PRODUCTS

BRC Storage and Distribution Quality and Safety Management System Implementation Workbook

The best just got better!

SQF Code Food Safety Management System Implementation Workbook

SQF 2000 Guidance. Guidance for Food Sector Category 4 Fresh Produce Pack House Operations. 1st Edition

PART III - EIII PROCESSING OF ANIMAL AND PLANT PERISHABLE PRODUCTS (MIXED PRODUCTS)

QUICK START GUIDE. SQF Implementation. for.

YOUR CERTIFICATION PROCESS EXPLAINED

The IFSQN FSSC Implementation Package Start Up Guide

PART III - EIII PROCESSING OF ANIMAL AND PLANT PERISHABLE PRODUCTS (MIXED PRODUCTS)

Key Changes for the Packaging Industry. Larry Dworkin Director of Government Relations The Packaging Association

General Guidance for Developing, Documenting, Implementing, Maintaining, and Auditing an SQF Quality System. Quality Code. SQF Quality Code, Edition 8

Leveraging GFSI to support Food Safety Management at Mondelez International

cgmp Audit Guideline April 1, 2018

What a Preventive Controls Facility Looks Like. FSMA-HARPC vs. HACCP

FOOD SAFETY AN OVERVIEW & INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW PEST CONTROL STANDARD RONNIE GURUNG HACCP AUSTRALIA

Compliant. Connected. Complete. White Paper: SOP Management as a Compliance Tool in FDA and ISO Environments

Food Safety Quality Management System

Whitepaper April 2014 UNDERSTANDING THE US FOOD SAFETY MODERNIZATION ACT 2011

PART III - EI PROCESSING OF ANIMAL PERISHABLE PRODUCTS

Integrated Pest Management Program Contract Guide Specification Revision -

BRC Food Safety Management System Implementation Workbook

SQF Food Safety Code for Storage and Distribution

DRAFT: FSSC FSMA Comparison

Dr. Ramakrishnan Nara Perry Johnson Registrars (PJR, USA)

Click here to order the IFSQN FSSC Certification Package Now. Food Service FSSC Food Safety Management System Implementation Workbook

EXPERTISE TRAINING PROGRAMS WORLD CLASS. Preventive Controls

Guidance Document. Meeting Requirements as a Registered Food Importer. A guidance document issued by the Ministry for Primary Industries

Click here to order the IFSQN FSSC Certification Package Now. FSSC Food Safety Management System Implementation Workbook

Further excellence. transparency

BRC Global Standard for Packaging and Packaging Materials

FSSC Version 3.2 to Version 4.1 Key Changes Document

SQF Code Food Safety Management System Implementation Workbook

FSMA Food Safety Seminar Japan External Trade Organization

PART III - EIV PROCESSING OF AMBIENT STABLE PRODUCTS

PEST MANAGEMENT ABBREVIATIONS & DEFINITION

GFSI BENCHMARKING REQUIREMENTS GFSI GUIDANCE DOCUMENT VERSION 7.2 PART III - M PRODUCTION OF FOOD PACKAGING

BRC Storage and Distribution Quality and Safety Management System

Change log. Issue no. Date Description. 1 May 2017 First Issue

JFS-A/B/C Standards <Manufacturing> [Interpretations]

SANITATION & ITS IMPORTANCE IN PEST MANAGEMENT. Bill Pursley VP Food Safety & International Development

FSMA Preventive Controls Preparedness Module and Guidance for BRC-certified Facilities Self-Assessment Tool

Self Assessment Checklist

Introduction to GFSI and Update on SQF

BRC Food Safety and Quality Management System

The Four Elements of an Effective Food Safety Management System

PART III - F PRODUCTION OF FEED. GFSI BENCHMARKING REQUIREMENTS GFSI Guidance Document Version 7.2

B.V BZ ZAANDAM

BRC Storage and Distribution Quality and Safety Management System Implementation Workbook

QUICK START GUIDE. for FSSC Implementation. Copyright 2016 Vinca, LLC.

Documenta tion and Records

Reducing Food Safety Risks through Recognized Systems. Thomas Bouraoui -- Exopack Corporate Director of Quality & CI

Supplement FSSC & FSMA for Human Food FOOD SAFETY SYSTEM CERTIFICATION FSSC FSMA Addendum for Human Food

SQF, Edition 8.0. September 26, LeAnn Chuboff Senior Technical Director, SQFI. Globally Trusted Food Safety and Quality Certification

QUALITY AGREEMENT. The following Agreement has been concluded between

GMP+ Feed Safety Assurance scheme. Sea Transport Affreightment

HAVING THE TALK : PREPARING FOR NEW CONVERSATION-BASED INSPECTIONS

It s Simple. Protect the integrity of your products and your brand during cold chain transportation.

CEPA Certified and European Standard EN 16636:2015

General food hygiene requirements and HACCP

Understanding the New SQF Fundamentals Code:

MARCH 16, :30-10:30 AM

Jeff Chilton, VP of Consulting Services, Alchemy

(More than 130 document files) GMP+ B3 Editable Document kit

The Red Seal Your Road to FSMA and Quality Compliance

HACCP Today: Critical Controls Concepts

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DIETARY INGREDIENT PROCESSORS

PART III - M PRODUCTION OF FOOD PACKAGING

SQF 2000 Food Safety Management System Implementation Workbook

For Food Processing. Presented by

Transcription:

V 2.0 USE OF REMOTE RODENT MONITORING WITH REGARD TO FOOD SAFETY REGULATIONS AND CURRENT PEST CONTROL PRACTICES 2019 BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP

TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 SUMMARY 1. SUMMARY 3 2. INTRODUCTION 4 3. IMPLEMENTATION OF BAYER RODENT MONITORING SYSTEM 5-7 3.1 BRIEF SYSTEM OVERVIEW 3.2 SYSTEM MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 3.3 RODENT CONTROL PROCESS FLOW SUPPORTED BY BAYER RMS 4. COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES 8 5. GFSI COMPLIANCE 9 6. SUPPLIER AUDIT PROGRAM 10 7. CONCLUSION 11 8. APPENDIX A 12 8.1 SAMPLE AREA EVENT REPORT 9. APPENDIX B 13-15 9.1 SAMPLE MAINTENANCE RECORD 9.2 SAMPLE CORRECTIVE ACTION FORM 9.3 SAMPLE PREVENTIVE INSPECTION CHECKLIST The Bayer Rodent Monitoring System (RMS) is a distributed sensor network designed to provide 24/7 monitoring of rodent activity. Its primary function is to instantly alert the pest management company of a rodent capture in a multi-catch or snap trap. The Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) has been implemented and the benchmarks of the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) have been accepted by many as industry standards. Therefore, pest management for the food industry must align itself with these regulations and standards to support a safe food supply chain. The RMS provides a reliable and convenient solution helping pest management companies become more valuable partners to the food industry. This paper outlines some of the requirements for pest management based on Food and Drug regulations and GFSI standards. It explains how the Bayer RMS can help pest management companies and food processing/handling facilities partner to implement a more effective rodent control management plan in response to these regulations and standards. In addition, the need for conducting a regular system maintenance program for the RMS is discussed. Using the Bayer RMS with appropriate data analysis and implementing timely corrective actions will help reduce the likelihood of rodent-induced food contamination, enhancing the rodent control program s efficacy. While the Bayer RMS improves the efficiency and accuracy of rodent control, effective implementation that is compliant with regulatory and GFSI standards (including corrective actions if needed) requires collaboration with pest management companies. 2 3

02 INTRODUCTION 03 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BAYER RODENT MONITORING SYSTEM 3.1 BRIEF SYSTEM OVERVIEW Currently, most pest management companies serving the food industry travel site to site, routinely checking each rodent trap for a capture. This lengthy, laborious process leaves limited time to make thorough and proper inspections of pest-conducive conditions throughout the facility. Additionally, most pest management and facility management teams are unable to detect real-time rodent activity with enough accuracy to strengthen their rodent control system beyond its current level. Even now, rodent trapping devices are still purely mechanical. The two basic functions, trap and kill, have remained the same for more than 100 years. Without a connected monitoring system, rodents are often not discovered until the pest control technician arrives on site and makes a visual inspection of the trap. Therefore, the ability to quickly identify, control and correct infestations is limited. The exact time of a possible infestation, capture or source of rodent activity cannot be known. In September 2015, the FDA issued the final rule for preventive control for human food as part of FSMA. The goal of this legislation is to safeguard the US food supply by shifting focus from reacting to contamination to proactively preventing it. FSMA requires more frequent prevention-oriented inspections of food processing/handling facilities to identify and protect against potential food safety hazards. The Bayer RMS makes rodent control easier in facilities that must comply with FSMA and GFSI certified programs (formerly known as schemes). It provides 24/7 monitoring of each rodent control location. If a rodent is captured, an immediate notification is sent to the pest management company and/or facility management. Trend lines and data from the system enable pest management companies to review the effectiveness of trap placements. Additionally, the rodent control practice supported by the Bayer RMS can better assist risk management and the decision-making process. As shown in Figure 1, the Bayer RMS displays each monitored location on a facility map, reporting each monitor s status in real time. The map is stored online in the Bayer Digital Pest Management (DPM) portal (Figure 2), facilitating secure collaboration between the pest management company and the facility management team. The initial placement of monitors is based on a site assessment (e.g., facility survey) and Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Program for maintaining consistency with prevailing standards. Once the monitors are installed, all responsible personnel, whether with the service provider (e.g., Pest Management Professional) or the site (e.g., QA manager), can access the DPM portal to learn the recent activity and status of each device. Available reporting includes: recent monitor activity, physical movements of the monitor, as well as rodent capture alerts. The system also provides daily heartbeat messages which verify proper system function, overall system connectivity and battery levels. FIGURE 1. ONLINE FLOOR MAP OF MONITORED LOCATIONS AND STATUS FIGURE 2. RECENT MESSAGE HISTORY OF ONE MONITOR ON THE DPM PORTAL 4 5

03 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BAYER RODENT MONITORING SYSTEM 03 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BAYER RODENT MONITORING SYSTEM 3.2 SYSTEM MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 3.3 RODENT CONTROL PROCESS FLOW SUPPORTED BY BAYER RM The system maintenance program is a risk-based and prevention-oriented program where monitors are manually inspected, cleaned and the probe triggered to confirm functionality; the latter is performed to document that the sensor is working in the absence of any mouse activity. The system maintenance frequency is determined in a systematic manner based on risk, driven by the likelihood of pest activity and the impact of product contamination from pest activity. In this way, it is recommended that monitored locations in high-impact areas or with a high likelihood of pest activity are checked more frequently than lower impact areas with less pest risk. The recommended minimum inspection frequency is influenced by the cleanliness of the monitored locations and how the monitors will be maintained onsite. An Area Event Report (Appendix 1) is available for pest management professionals in advance or upon arrival at the facility. This report helps them determine which monitors require routine maintenance or cleaning and which monitors need to be repositioned following a move from their assigned location. By focusing a PMP s effort on the monitors truly requiring attention, the PMP gains time previously lost to unproductive work (i.e., checking empty mouse traps). This time can be used to evaluate pest vulnerabilities in the facility, investigate infestations or provide other valued-added services to the client. Prior to installing the RMS, it is recommended that all stakeholders discuss and agree upon the responsibilities of each party. Suggested guidance can be found in Table 1. However, this guidance is provided as a general suggestion. Exact responsibilities may vary and should be determined by the needs, preferences and any applicable legal agreements between the parties. The general process flow is presented in Figure 3. TABLE 1. GUIDANCE FOR THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF RODENT CONTROL SUPPORTED BY THE BAYER RMS Bayer PARTY Pest Management Company Facility Management RESPONSIBILITIES Support service provider for site assessment and installation Provide 24/7 monitoring and capture alerts Provide pest management professionals with Area Event Report (Appendix 1) and trend line reporting Provide detailed digital maps showing the location and status of each monitor (Figure 1) Agreed service plan Provide pest control service Respond to notifications; take corrective actions Implement System Maintenance Program Respond to notification alerts as needed Good sanitation practices; inspect incoming materials Review and verify pest management service Take corrective actions including work order for facility maintenance FIGURE 3. RODENT CONTROL PROCESS FLOW SUPPORTED BY THE BAYER RMS AREA EVENT REPORT SITE ASSESSMENT CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 6 TREND LINES SYSTEM MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 7

04 COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES 05 GFSI COMPLIANCE In the food industry, pest control is regulated by current Good Manufacturing Practices (cgmps), a prerequisite for a Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)-based food and a preventive control for a Preventive Control Plan (PCP). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), rodents pose a threat to public health because they can carry diseases, such as Salmonellosis and Leptospirosis. Two primary sources of Salmonella are dead insects and rodent infestation both of which result from ineffective pest management practices. The stringent compliance with cgmps is the fundamental guarantee of food safety and company brand protection. The following table provides an assessment of how the Bayer RMS helps rodent control service conform to cgmps. TABLE 2. COMPLIANCE WITH CGMPS SUPPORTED BY BAYER REMOTE MONITORING CURRENT GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE IN MANUFACTURING, PACKING, OR HOLDING HUMAN FOOD, 21 CFR 117.35 (C) Pest Control 8 No pests shall be allowed in any area of a food plant.. Effective measures shall be taken to exclude pests from the processing areas and to protect against the contamination of food on the premises by pests. The use of insecticides or rodenticides is permitted only under precautions and restrictions that will protect against the contamination of food, food-contact surfaces, and food-packaging materials. BAYER RMS SOLUTION Guided by IPM, the site assessment identifies rodent-introduced food safety risks in different control areas at a facility; it influences the initial monitor placement schemes. After installation, rodent activity is monitored 24/7 at these designated locations. Capture notifications with timestamps are sent to pest management professionals and/or facility management. Corrective actions can be taken in a timely manner following a capture. The GFSI is an industry driven global collaboration to advance food safety. The Bayer RMS is an innovative rodent management and information platform that can help facilities be compliant with GFSI benchmarked standards. Some of the more comprehensive certification programs (formerly schemes) in the U.S. are the British Retail Consortium (BRC), the Safe Quality Food (SQF) and the Food Safety System Certification (FSSC) 22000 standards. Table 3 provides a summary of the essential elements from these schemes as they relate to pest control. They are all responsible for achieving high objectives in food safety management and a successful audit with regard to pest control. TABLE 3. KEY REQUIREMENTS OF PEST CONTROL FROM GFSI RECOGNIZED FOOD SAFETY SCHEMES GFSI SCHEMES BRC FSSC 22000 SQF General Requirements Documentation Specifications Corrective action General GMPs and prerequisite programs (PRPs) Pest Control TABLE 4. RODENT CONTROL PRACTICE SUPPORTED BY RMS FOR GFSI COMPLIANCE General Requirements Documentation Specifications Corrective Action General GMPs PRPs Pest Control A HACCP-based food safety management system is required by all schemes. It must be periodically evaluated and updated to ensure the current food safety plan incorporates the most recent food safety issues. BRC requires that records in electronic form be suitably backed up to prevent loss. Prepare policies, procedures, work instructions, specifications and effective corrective actions resulting from non-conformance. All schemes require documented specifications for raw materials, finished products, and any product or service which could affect product integrity. A regular review should be in place to ensure these specifications are kept up to date. All schemes require that the organization has documented procedures in place for the determination and implementation of timely corrective action relating to product safety. Food Manufacturer shall have effective PRPs in place and be included in the development and review of HACCP. Inspection frequency based on risk assessment; timely response. Any rodent management devices shall be mapped and kept current. GFSI SCHEME REQUIREMENTS PAS 220:2008 Prerequisite programs Pest control programs; preventing access, harborage and infestation; monitoring and detection. Documented records showing GMP are followed in all modules; training of personnel. Outline the pest control method and inspection frequency; measure the effectiveness of current method. BAYER RMS The installation of monitors is based on a detailed site assessment (including business type, risk assessment and pest activity). Further, the system can generate trend lines periodically to advise monitor placement schemes and inspection frequency. Bayer RMS maintains time-stamped records of all messages from the monitor(s) (e.g., movement, capture, heartbeat, last time inspected, etc.). The records can be retrieved for documentation purposes. Device specifications are provided by Bayer. The PCO or QA Manager can respond to capture messages or movements of the monitors as needed to protect product safety. Real-time alerts enable more timely corrective actions. From the outset, Bayer RMS identifies rodent activity in different control areas. This information can be used to perform a hazard analysis to reduce or prevent infestation. Licensed service providers Detailed site assessment Data analysis and trend lines to review the effectiveness of current program Enhances IPM by reducing conducive conditions for infestation by enabling additional preventive measures such as excluding pest access and removing harborage. 9

06 SUPPLIER AUDIT PROGRAM 07 CONCLUSION A Second-Party Audit Program verifies that suppliers meet their customers expectations in product safety and quality, facility environment. Food manufacturers, distributors, brokers and retailers should use their audit programs to ensure that controls are consistent with internal and external standards. The intention of a second-party audit program is not to set disciplines; rather, it is to improve the overall quality system throughout the supply chain, thus leading to a more efficient product sourcing and purchasing process. The expectations for pest management programs that apply to rodent control are briefly summarized below: Written pest management plans Inspection procedures and frequencies for plant infrastructure, pests, and all pest devices that demonstrate control Required documentation of pest activity log and analysis of records for trends in activity Documented corrective actions Training requirements; Licensed Pest Control Operators A dated map showing the location of pest control devices, such as interior rodent traps, glue boards, insect light traps, outdoor bait stations, and pheromone traps As detailed in Table 4, the Bayer RMS can help facilities meet the rising expectations demanded by supplier audit programs. Additionally, the Bayer RMS can help companies improve the traceability and visibility of a product recall, minimize loss of the recall and quickly determine the root cause of any potential rodent infestation. Protecting food safety throughout the entire food supply chain requires extensive control measures and coordination between parties. The Bayer RMS provides data and monitoring services that improve rodent control management. These features help reduce the number of errors attributed to manual data entry or incomplete record keeping. The system can be easily configured and managed, providing pest management companies and food facility management with informed and reliable rodent control plans to jointly protect food safety. The benefits of the Bayer RMS include: 24/7 monitoring and real-time capture alerts Enables rapid response, root cause analysis and immediate corrective actions Up-to-minute trend lines and reporting Helps verify site rodent program conforms to GMP requirements and GFSI benchmarked standards Automatic, real-time information improving audit readiness Enables pest management professionals to spend their time proactively inspecting the facility for possible pest entry points Helps pest management professionals upskill in facility inspections and rodent biology 10 11

08 APPENDIX A APPENDIX B 8.1 SAMPLE AREA EVENT REPORT 9.1 SAMPLE MAINTENANCE RECORD Remote Rodent Monitor System Maintenance Record Pest management company: Site location: Maintenance tasks: Refer to SOP XX--XXXX Customer: Monitor# Date Time Pass/Fail Maintenance Summary PCO (Initial) Reviewer s signature: Date of review: 12 13

APPENDIX B APPENDIX B 9.2 SAMPLE CORRECTIVE ACTION FORM 9.3 SAMPLE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST Sample Corrective Action Form Preventive Maintenance Checklist Date of Record: Events or observation: Completed by PCO Completed by QA Root cause analysis (if applicable): Actions Taken: Task Date Initials of the person completing the task Work Order Assigned to Date of Completion Signature Date: Signature: Evaluation of the corrective action: Evaluated by: Date: Reviewed by: Date of Review: 14 15