Use of TMC Data for Performance Measurement and Improving Operations. National Rural ITS Conference August 25, 2014 Ming Shiun Lee URS Corporation

Similar documents
Transportation Management Center Data Capture for Performance and Mobility Measures Guidebook

Management. VA SITE Annual Meeting June 27, 2013 Jay Styles Performance and Strategic t Planning Manager, Business Transformation Office

NCHRP 20-7 Guide to Benchmarking Operations Performance Measures Incident Duration - Pilot Test Results

RAPID INCIDENT SCENE CLEARANCE (RISC)

ODOT Transportation Systems Management & Operations Plan

Dec 20, 2007 Operations Performance Measures Conference Call

A Tutorial on Establishing Effective Work Zone Performance Measures

Towing & Recovery. Incentive Program (T.R.I.P.) Pre-KICKOFF MEETING April 4, 2017

Decision Support Systems for FDOT District 4 TSM&O

INCIDENT MANAGEMENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS (TSM&O) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT SIX

Proposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Congestion Management Process

Traffic/Mobility Analytics

Wisconsin Traffic Operations Performance Management System (TOPMS)-Phase 1. Advisory Group Meeting-November 10, 2014

Operations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations

Transportation Systems Management & Operations (TSMO) 2017 ACEC-IA/IDOT/FHWA Transportation Conference August 24, 2017

SECTION II CONTROLLED ACCESS FACILITIES

Lesson 3 4-Hour Version Slide: 4H-45

Project Prioritization for Urban and Rural Projects TEAM CONFERENCE March 7, 2018

NOCoE Peer Exchange Performance-Based Contracting

Current Trends in Traffic Congestion Mitigation

Using INRIX Data in Iowa. Kyle Barichello, Iowa DOT Skylar Knickerbocker, InTrans

National Traffic Incident Management Coalition. Improving Traffic Incident Management Together

Regional Operations Forum

CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS IN HAMPTON ROADS, VIRGINIA

Developed by the Ohio Lane Closure Protocol Committee:

MnDOT TSMO Implementation Planning TSMO Objective Profiles 8/15/18 DRAFT

An Application of ITS for Incident Management in Second-Tier Cities: A Fargo, ND Case Study

Active Direction to Managing Transportation ATDM: Ohio s Perspective

Since the Vision 2000 effort under taken in 1995, ODOT has operated under a Mission,

Chapter 10. Intelligent Transportation Systems. Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments Regional Transportation Plan

I-81 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

VDOT S STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS CENTER (TOC) AND SAFETY SERVICE PATROL (SSP) CONTRACT

ATTACHMENT D. Open Roads Policy

Corridor Modernization

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

USING A SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT FOR DYNAMIC TOLL ANALYSIS

Predicting Travel Time Reliability: Methods and Implications for Practice

Traffic Data Programs at Virginia DOT: 10 plus Years of Innovation

Telling the Freight (trucking/goods movement) story:

APPENDIX I. Florida Department of Transportation and Florida Highway Patrol Open Roads Policy RFP-DOT-16/ JR

INTEGRATING FREIGHT IN CORRIDOR PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. Steve Linhart, AICP Caroline Mays, AICP

Performance Measures for Transportation Planning Part 1

Florida s Mobility Performance Measures and Experience

The Hampton Roads Region

Transportation Management Data:

and Training Guide Technical Review Panel Meeting Illinois Department of Transportation October 15, 2009

Association for Commuter Transportation Recommendations to USDOT on MAP-21 Performance Measures

TXDOT TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CENTER (TMC) PERFORMANCE METRICS. Evolution by Performance Metrics

Connected Vehicle Pilot Deployment Program

Helping Operators Make Better Decisions and Improve Multi- Agency Cooperation

research report Performance Analysis of Virginia's Safety Service Patrol Programs: A Case Study Approach Virginia Transportation Research Council

Motorist Quotes of the Week about ERTOC SSP (No new comments for this week)

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

2 Purpose and Need. 2.1 Study Area. I-81 Corridor Improvement Study Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

US 75 Integrated Corridor Management

Congestion Management Process (CMP)

Emergency Incident Management, Benefits and Operational Issues

Rural Intelligent Transportation Systems Toolbox. A National Highway Institute Training Program

Prioritization for Infrastructure Investment in Transportation

The Ohio Department of Transportation Asset Management Playbook Plays for Success

Week Ending March 16, 2012 Our Mission: Traveler Services; 100% accurate, anywhere, anytime. Total: Average: Total: Average: Total: Average: Total:

Active Traffic Management in Michigan. Patrick Johnson, P.E. HNTB Michigan Inc.

Appendix A: Equipment Packages for St. Louis Regional ITS Architecture

Congest-Shun. Tim Lomax Texas A&M Transportation Institute

PA Turnpike Topics. Traffic Engineering and Operations Tim Scanlon P.E., Mike Pack, Tom Macchione P.E., Justina Wentling P.E.

A method to determine roadways with greatest need for intelligent transportation deployments

I-80 Winter Maintenance Coalition

UNIT V TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

35 Moving Forward. O p t i m i z a t i o n P l a n E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y. Project # KA Johnson and Wyandotte Counties

III. Regional TSM&O Overview from the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (Jessica Josselyn, Kittelson & Associates, Inc.)

Transportation Management Plan

Week Ending March 23, 2012 Our Mission: Traveler Services; 100% accurate, anywhere, anytime. Total: Average: Total: Average: Total: Average: $4.

Advancing Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSMO) in Rural Areas

Regional Evaluation Decision tool for Smart Growth

NATMEC June 30, 2014 Anita Vandervalk, PE, PMP

HCM 6th Edition Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide (PPEAG) to the HCM Bringing Back-of-the-Envelope Back.

TMC of the Future. Dr. Bob Edelstein, PE, PTOE Senior Vice President

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

Smarter Work Zones Paul Pisano FHWA Work Zone Management Team

Smarter Work Zones Webinar Series

Florida s Approach to Maximizing Advances in Data and Technology for Performance Management

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

KANSAS WORK ZONE SAFETY AND MOBILITY PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES

CALIFORNIA S FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL PROGRAM

Amarillo, TX Regional ITS Architecture Customized Market Package Diagrams. Advanced Traffic Management Systems (ATMS)

10.0 Congestion Management Process

ENTERPRISE Transportation Pooled Fund Study TPF-5 (231)

I-90 Smart Road: Operational Features. October 18th, 2017 Scott Lee, P.E., TIMS Project Manager, Parsons Amarpal Matharu, P.E.

Toledo Freeway Management System

EVALUATION OF THIRD-PARTY TRAVEL TIME DATA IN TALLAHASSEE, FL

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 3 Existing Facilities & System Performance

The future of cellular communication on transportation systems

SR 99 Incident Response After- Action Plan

Congestion Management Safety Plan Phase 4

: value pricing. application of the 10 criteria for the long-term consideration of 5.1 THE UNIVERSE OF FACILITIES IN THE DALLAS- FORT WORTH REGION

New Jersey Pilot Study

Intelligent Transportation Systems

Deployment and Evaluation of ITS Technology in Work Zones

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAB September 20, 2017

Transcription:

Use of TMC Data for Performance Measurement and Improving Operations National Rural ITS Conference August 25, 2014 Ming Shiun Lee URS Corporation 1

Presentation Outline Motivations Performance Measures TMC Operations Incident Management System Mobility Data and Trends Guiding Principles 2

Motivations Legislative mandates Agency wide performance initiatives Formal business linkage particularly for operations Use performance reporting to improve agency cooperation, or employee actions Plan future investments / resource allocation Quantification of benefits To assist in defense of program funding To assist in competition for additional funding with infrastructure projects 3

Practitioner Survey Results Initial reporting activities Description of activities being performed Number of incidents responded to by size of incident Number of DMS messages posted Size and operational condition of equipment/staff Number of devices / staff Number of operating devices / staff on duty 4

Practitioner Survey Results Second level TMC reporting activities Detailed quantification of activities being performed, e.g., Detailed incident descriptives for trend reporting Log of incident types, timestamps, actions taken Number of incidents lasting more than 90 minutes Time required to post DMS messages Size and operational condition of equipment/staff Time required to repair equipment 5

Practitioner Survey Results Second Level Reporting Mobility Data Volumes, delays, reliability Reported as travel times, congestion by location, revenue (HOT lanes), severe weather response Most TMCs are reporting current conditions Not all TMCs are actively summarizing roadway performance data for analysis Increasing use of private sector probe data Still need agency collected volume data 6

Practitioner Survey Results Third Level Reporting: advanced TMCs are actively working on improved reporting of Cause and effect of disruptions Responses to those disruptions The effect / effectiveness of those responses Activities After action reports and summaries for improving agency response and interaction Before and after reports on conditions after new activities are undertaken Benefits analyses for programs 7

Practitioner Survey Results Performance reporting growth What we are doing? How well are we doing those activities? What is happening on the roadway? How what we are doing effects what is happening on the roadway? 8

TMC Operations Focus on statistics regarding TMC operations activities and assets Basic performance measures are divided into three categories: ITS Infrastructure and Traveler Information Services TMC Operational Activities and Responsibilities TMC Staff Performance 9

TMC Operations: ITS Infrastructure / Number of Devices Traveler Info Services Coverage Miles covered AADT exposed to DMS Source: WisDOT Bureau of Traffic Operations, Statewide Traffic Operations Center (STOC) 2011 Annual Performance Measures Report 10

TMC Operations: ITS Infrastructure / Usage Traveler Info Services (Contd.) Number of times equipment was used by TMC staff Number of times traveler information services were used/viewed by the public Source: RIDOT Traffic Management Center Incident Statistics (4/1/12 to 6/30/12) Source: WisDOT July 2012 MAPSS Performance Dashboard Report 11

TMC Operations: ITS Infrastructure / Traveler Info Services (Contd.) Device Availability/Maintenance Activities Average Device Availability Number of repairs/trouble tickets by device type Source: VDOT Hampton Roads Transportation Operations Center 2011 Annual Report 12

TMC Operations: TMC Activities / Responsibilities Number of Calls Received Number of Incidents Managed/Responded To Detection Source/How Notified Source: Houston TranStar 2010 Annual Report 13

TMC Operations: TMC Staff Performance Staff Performance Targets Staff Retention and Turnover Rates Source: FDOT District Six ITS Annual Report (Fiscal Year 2010 2011) 14

TMC Operations: Data Sources ATMS/TMC Equipment ATMS/TMC System Logs (i.e. TMC Operator Event Logs) DMS Operating Status and Message Log ITS Maintenance Logs Asset Management Systems 511/Web Site Travel Information System Usage Reports 15

Traffic Incident Management Basic performance measures are divided into three categories: Traffic Incident Statistics Incident Timeline Safety Service Patrol Activities 16

Incident Management: Traffic Incident Statistics Number of Incidents, by: Type or Severity Location Time of Day or Day of Week Duration Many agencies have identified and are tracking specific incident characteristics based on agency priorities, such as number of incidents involving: Tractor trailers/semis Lane blockages Rollovers Secondary crashes 17

Incident Management: Incident Time 18

Incident Management: Incident Time (Contd.) Source: MoDOT Tracker Measures of Departmental Performance, July 2012 Source: Washington State DOT The Gray Notebook, Quarter Ending June 30, 2011 19

Incident Management: Full Function Service Patrol (FFSP) Number of assists/services provided, by: Type Location Time of Day Response and clearance times Source: TDOT HELP Program Annual Operations Report (January 1, 2011 December 31, 2011) Source: VDOT Hampton Roads Transportation Operations Center 2011 Annual Report 20

Incident Management: Full Function Service Patrol (Contd.) Motorists feedback, typically obtained through comment cards, provides a qualitative review of performance Source: WisDOT Bureau of Traffic Operations, Statewide Traffic Operations Center (STOC) 2011 Annual Performance Measures Report 21

Incident Management: Full Function Service Patrol Good Practices The HRTOC Safety Service Patrol (SSP) program utilizes quarterly incident data to reconfigure SSP routes for the most effective use of resources Many agencies have calculated Benefit to Cost Ratios for their FFSP programs (Baird, 2008) Range from 4.6:1 to 42:1 Median 9.45:1 Average 12.4:1 Source: VDOT Hampton Roads Transportation Operations Center 2011 Annual Report 22

Traffic Incident Management: Data Sources TMC Input of response partners Incident response data come from: Law enforcement Fire EMS Emergency management Towing and recovery providers Media Traveling public

System Mobility Key Measures Speed / Travel Time Volume Lane Occupancy / Density 24

System Mobility: Roadway Where is congestion? How often does it occur? When does it occur? How long does it last? Performance Described at the location and corridor level Speed or frequency of congestion, versus Travel time How many people/vehicles/trucks are using the system? 25

Where is Congestion? 26

When does it occur? How long does it last? Using Travel Time Using Speed, or Frequency of Congestion At a Location Also Shows Volume 27

System Mobility: Reporting Methods Answer these basic questions in a combination of graphic and tabular forms Use indices when comparing routes Otherwise use terms that your audience understands Tailor the reporting statistics and presentation format to your audience 28

System Mobility: Summary Tables for Comparisons / Trends Northbound I 5 Volumes General Purpose Lanes AM Vehicle Volume AADT Location Peak Period (6 9 AM) Peak Hour Interstate 5 S. Pearl St. 20,500 7,500 104,600 University 18,200 6,600 104,400 St. NE 63 rd St. 13,300 5,800 98,300 NE 137th 11,600 4,500 93,100 29

System Mobility: Travel Time Index Comparison 30

System Mobility: Summary Statistics Basic speed and volume data can also be summarized as Vehicle hours of delay Vehicle miles of delay Centerline miles of congestion (by time period) As data/experience grows, more sophisticated reporting can be undertaken Person delay versus vehicle delay Reporting trucking use and delay separate from people or vehicles Lost highway productivity HOV versus GP lane performance 31

System Mobility: Information Delivery Traditional paper reports Web based information delivery 32

System Mobility: Data Sources Fixed Sensors Volume Spot speed Lane occupancy Vehicle Probes Speed data on roadway segments Manual Collection Vehicle occupancy counts

Additional Measures Customer (Public) Satisfaction Incident Delay Recovery Time Other Measures to Consider 34

Public Satisfaction Determine value of TMC activities in terms of improved roadway performance What benefits does the public experience as a result of TMC activities? Also examines the public s perception of the value of those activities 35

Incident Delay Measuring changes in outcomes Congestion, Throughput and Travel time As a result of activities of TMC Incident response Traffic management plans/controls Disruption response (e.g., snow plow operations) Primarily uses data collected for Mobility reporting (for outcomes as experienced by users) TIM (to describe TMC management activities) Incident response (to describe incident response activities) 36

Recovery Time TMCs may need to define specific traffic outcomes When has a road recovered from an event? Different time for different corridors/geographic areas Snow fall stops in the north but not the south Recovery may be different on different roads Rural roads High volume urban freeways Roads experiencing snow / ice conditions 37

Before / After Studies Report outcome of new traffic control activities Requires before data 170 veh / hr / ln improvement LOS F occurs 1 day per week less often 38

Guiding Principles Take Stock of Your Existing Data Identify Near Term Monitoring Needs Start with What You Can Report Don t Let the Perfect be the Enemy of the Good Collect and Archive Data that Describe TMC s Activities Increase Reporting as More Data Become Available 39

Guiding Principles (Contd.) Track and Report Trends Use Reporting Language that Meets Audience Needs Collect Data to Understand Cause and Effect Relationships Set Goals and Monitor Results Use Monitoring and Reporting Outcomes to Actively Manage Staff and Resources 40

Additional Resources Transportation Management Center Data Capture for Performance and Mobility Measures Guidebook (http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/47000/47500/47564/fhwa JPO 13 062_Final_Pkg_508.pdf) Manual (http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/47000/47500/47563/fhwa JPO 13 055_Final_Pkg_508.pdf) TMC Performance Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Handbook http://tmcpfs.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/projects/tmcpmerhdbk.ht m