SCAMPI SM Maintenance Appraisals (SCAMPI M)

Similar documents
The Economics of CMMI

Project Selection for SCAMPI A

CMMI A-Specification. Version 1.7. November, For CMMI Version 1.2. This document is controlled by the CMMI Steering Group.

2018 CMMI Institute 1

SCAMPI A Appraisals - Preparation in 100 Hours; Execution in a Week

AZIST Inc. About CMMI. Leaders in CMMI Process Consulting and Training Services

Experiences with Indicator-Based CMMI Appraisals at Raytheon

WE THOUGHT BUT NOW WE KNOW

CMMI High Maturity An Initial Draft Interpretation for V1.3

Changes to the SCAMPI Methodology and How to Prepare for a SCAMPI Appraisal

SCAMPI V1.3 Status. SCAMPI Upgrade Team Carnegie Mellon University

How to Develop Highly Useable CMMI Documentation

Streamlining Processes and Appraisals

Dorna Witkowski Lynn Penn Lockheed Martin, Information Systems & Global Services (IS&GS) Copyright 2009 Lockheed Martin Corporation

Techniques for Shortening the Time and Cost of CMMI Appraisals

Welcome to the CMMI Use in DoD Programs Workshop & Summit September 7 & 8, 2005

A Quantitative Comparison of SCAMPI A, B, and C

Using Pilots to Assess the Value and Approach of CMMI Implementation

CMMI Version 1.2. Model Changes

NATURAL S P I. Critical Path SCAMPI SM. Getting Real Business Results from Appraisals

USING PILOTS TO ASSESS THE VALUE AND APPROACH OF CMMI IMPLEMENTATION. Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC)

Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI SM ) A, Version 1.3: Method Definition Document

SCAMPI V1.1 Method Overview

Highlights of CMMI and SCAMPI 1.2 Changes

Debra J. Perry Harris Corporation. How Do We Get On The Road To Maturity?

Top 5 Systems Engineering Issues within DOD and Defense Industry

Gary Natwick Harris Corporation

Risk Mitigated SCAMPI SM Process

CMMI-DEV v1.3 Good? Bad? Ugly?

Integrated Class C Process Appraisals (ICPA)

SCAMPI Appraisal Methods A+B Process Group SCAMPI process v1.0

What s New in V1.3. Judah Mogilensky Process Enhancement Partners, Inc.

CMMI SM Mini- Assessments

Appraisal Program Quality Report

CMMI Version 1.3: Are you Ready for Release?

Strategies for Transitioning from SW-CMM to CMMI

CMMI Today The Current State

Our Experience of the SCAMPI E Pilot SEPG North America, Pittsburgh October 1st, 2013

CMMI for Services: Re-introducing the CMMI for Services Constellation

An Overview of the SCAMPI Lead Appraiser. Body of Knowledge (SLA BOK) Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213

SCAMPI SM C ++ to C- How much is enough?

Lean SCAMPI SM. Jeffrey L. Dutton Chief Engineer Jacobs Technology Inc. ITSS

CMMI for Services (CMMI -SVC) Process Areas

Collaborative Government / Contractor SCAMPI Appraisal

A Real-Life Example of Appraising and Interpreting CMMI Services Maturity Level 2

Software Engineering. Lecture 7: CMMI

MTAT Software Engineering Management

CMMI Current State and Future Plans

An Initial Comparative Analysis of the CMMI Version 1.2 Development Constellation and the ISO 9000 Family

CMMI Version 1.2 and Beyond

CMMI Current State. Bob Rassa Industry CMMI Chair, Raytheon. Clyde Chittister Chief Operating Officer, Software Engineering Institute

Shrinking the Elephant: If Implementing CMMI Practices Looks Like More Effort than it s Worth, Let s Look Again. Sam Fogle ACE Guides, LLC

A Software and Systems Process Improvement Initiative in NAVAIR: the Model Based Appraisal (MBA)

Sampling for Software Process Assessments, Evaluations, and Appraisals. Dr. Mark C. Paulk 13 October 2017

Lockheed Martin Benefits Continue Under CMMI

NDIA Systems Engineering Division. November in partnership with: Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University

A Family of SCAMPI SM Appraisal Methods

CMMI Re-Appraisal Moving Barriers & Making Strides

"LEANING" APPRAISALS NAME: TITLE: Michael S. Evanoo, CQE, HMLA, SSBB, Scrum Master Quality Strategist. ORGANIZATION: DXC Technology / US Public Sector

Software technology 3. Process improvement models. BSc Course Dr. Katalin Balla

SCAMPI A Applied to Small Settings A Success Story

CMMI Small Business Pilot Schedule

The CMMI Product Suite and International Standards

Top 10 Signs You're Ready (or Not)

Brochure of CMMI 1.3!

Dennis R. Goldenson James McCurley Robert W. Stoddard II. CMMI Technology Conference & User Group Denver, Colorado 19 November 2009

The CMMI Value Proposition

Pittsburgh, PA

CERT Resilience Management Model Capability Appraisal Method (CAM) Version 1.1

What Functional Groups Are Included in the CMMI -SE/SW/IPPD/SS Model?

Boldly Going Where Few Have Gone Before SCAMPI SM C Appraisal Using the CMMI for Acquisition

SCAMPI-B for Contract Monitoring A Case Study of the Mission Planning Enterprise Contractors

CMMI SM Model Measurement and Analysis

CMM,,mproving and,ntegrating

A Global Overview of The Structure

Revista Economică 70:4 (2018) USING THE INTEGRATED CAPABILITY AND MATURITY MODEL IN THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OF SOFTWARE SYSTEMS

Transition from SW-CMM to CMMI : The Benefits Continue!

VALUE OF CMMI REAPPRAISALS

The Explicit Relationship Between CMMI and Project Risks

The Continuous Representation:

Becoming an Authorized Organization for escm Capability Determination Services

CMMI SCAMPI Distilled Using Appraisals for Process Improvement

SWEN 256 Software Process & Project Management

An Embedded SCAMPI-C Appraisal at the National Security Agency. NDIA CMMI Technology Conference and User s Group November 15, 2007

Update Observations of the Relationships between CMMI and ISO 9001:2000

Experiences in the Application of MDD v1.3 Sampling Factors

CC and CMMI. An Approach to Integrate CC with Development

Strategies for Transitioning to CMMI-SVC

A Practical Guide to Implementing Levels 4 and 5

Assessment Results using the Software Maintenance Maturity Model (S 3m )

What do federal and DoD Organizations expect from companies who have adopted CMMI?

Patricia A Eglin Intro to CMMI Instructor Agile Coach Measurements Specialist

How to Kick Start a Process Improvement Project to Achieve a CMMI Rating Brenda F. Hall Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC)

AN EXAMINATION OF A RULE-BASED EXPERT SYSTEM TO AID IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CMMI FRAMEWORK

Leveling: In Lieu of a Mind Meld

The Process In-Execution Review (PIER) After Three Years

Maturity Models - CMMI

Software Process Assessment

Do s and Don ts of Appraisal Preparation

Transitioning a Merged Organization to CMMI and a New OSSP. NDIA CMMI Technology Conference November 14, 2002

Transcription:

SCAMPI SM Maintenance Appraisals (SCAMPI M) Michael Campo, Raytheon Company NDIA CMMI Working Group NDIA Systems Engineering Division 2012 NDIA CMMI Technology Conference and User Group November 7, 2012 SM SCAMPI is a service mark of Carnegie Mellon University. CMMI Working Group 1

Agenda Introduction SCAMPI M Objectives Status and Plans Key SCAMPI M Definitions SCAMPI M Method Overview Operational Concept SCAMPI M Appraisal Planning Organizational Scope and Sampling Characterizations and Ratings Action Plans Team Qualifications Summary CMMI Working Group 2

Introduction SCAMPI A appraisal costs have been problematic for many businesses seeking to use CMMI and SCAMPI A to benchmark their organizational processes. Appraisals are expensive and often perceived as a burden to CMMI adoption. After a SCAMPI A is completed, an organization must then conduct additional SCAMPI A appraisals every 3 years to maintain the previously achieved rating. Diverts valuable process improvement funding to a benchmarking activity that may offer little value in return. SCAMPI Maintenance Appraisal (SCAMPI M): Removes the need for a full SCAMPI A appraisal every 3 years by defining a low cost maintenance appraisal method to extend the lifespan of a SCAMPI A rating without compromising rating integrity. Similar to ISO 9001/AS9100, TL9000 surveillance benchmarking activities. CMMI Working Group 3

SCAMPI M Objectives A SCAMPI M appraisal should be not be more than 25-30% of the cost of a SCAMPI A. SCAMPI M appraisal must be rigorous enough to ensure full confidence in extending the results of a SCAMPI A appraisal. A SCAMPI M appraisal will provide an extension of SCAMPI A results for 2 years from the completion date of the maintenance appraisal. Maximum time between SCAMPI A appraisals is 5 years. SCAMPI M appraisal scan be used for all CMMI constellations and the People CMM. Both staged and continuous representations will be supported. CMMI Working Group 4

Status and Plans SCAMPI M concept drafted by the NDIA CMMI Working Group in 2011. Presented at 2011 CMMI Workshop and 2011 NDIA CMMI Conference Briefed to CMMI Steering Group in November 2011 Feedback from the 2011 presentations and briefings was used to document a detailed SCAMPI M method written as Appendix J to the SCAMPI A MDD. Appendix J was reviewed by the NDIA CMMI Working Group and SEI Appraisal Program. Updates to Appendix J followed each review Revised concepts were reviewed with CMMI Steering Group, which voted unanimously to proceed with community review and pilots. SEI distributed Appendix J for small review to 18 lead appraisers in August 2012 Community review to follow analysis of lead appraiser comments Initial SCAMPI M pilot is in progress. Planned release date is early 2013 CMMI Working Group 5

SCAMPI M Key Definitions (1 of 2) Model Scope - the set of reference model process areas that are investigated within the organizational unit in an appraisal, and, for CMMI models, the representation chosen as well as the associated maximum capability or maturity level targeted. Model Sample Scope - a subset of the model scope that will be investigated in Stage 2 of a SCAMPI M appraisal to determine whether the organizational unit s SCAMPI A rating may be extended. The model sample scope consists of an investigative sample and random sample of model scope process area specific goals and generic practices. - The investigative sample is a set of specific goals and generic practices within the model scope that have been identified by the appraisal team based on objective evidence (artifacts and affirmations) reviewed during SCAMPI M Stage 1. - The random sample is a set of specific goals and any generic practices within the model scope that are randomly selected to supplement the investigative sample. CMMI Working Group 6

SCAMPI M Key Definitions (2 of 2) High Yield Artifact a work product which may be used as an objective evidence artifact for multiple practices in the appraisal reference model. Examples of high yield artifacts include plans, schedules, financial reports, and review packages. Action Plan - a bounded set of activities performed to address weaknesses that led to unsatisfied goals in a SCAMPI M appraisal. The action plan includes an appraisal plan, organizational unit corrective action activities, a reappraisal of SCAMPI M unsatisfied goals, and reporting of results to the CMMI Steward. CMMI Working Group 7

SCAMPI M Appraisals - Operational Concept SCAMPI Maintenance Appraisal SCAMPI A Organizational Unit, Basic Units & Support Functions Organizational Unit, Basic Units & Support Functions Current Org Unit Org Business Objectives Appraisal Objectives Appraisal Constraints Input SCAMPI M Planning Determine M Applicability Determine Scope Select & Prepare Team Output SCAMPI M Appraisal Plan Schedule Timeline, Constraints & Risks SEI Notification (30 days) Appraisal Scope High-Yield Artifact Collection High-Yield Artifacts Organization Staff Presentations Demonstrations Action Plan optional If Mini Planning Mini Planning unsatisfied goals Mini Planning Stage 1: Examine High- Yield Artifacts Artifact Review Discussions Risk Evaluation Model Sample Scope Investigative Sample Random Sample Stage 2 Data Collection Plan Artifacts for Model Sample Scope Organization Staff Presentations Demonstrations x Stage 2: Evaluate Model Sample Scope Artifact Review Interviews Characterization Rating Final Findings Goal Ratings Final Findings Rating Extension (+2 yrs) or Rating Revoked (if an Action Plan is not pursued) Report Results Appraisal Record Develop ADS ADS Appraisal Record New Artifacts Organization Staff Presentations Demonstrations Input Input Input Action Plan: Address Unsat Goals Reappraise Unsat Goals Rating Final Findings Output Output Output Output Goal Ratings Final Findings Rating Extension (+2 yrs) or Rating Revoked 45 Days or Less Up to 4 Months CMMI Working Group 8

SCAMPI M Appraisal Planning Organizational unit change must be within SCAMPI M appraisal method constraints. Sampling factors and sampling factor values must be the same, or a subset of, those used in SCAMPI A. Model scope cannot be greater than the SCAMPI A baseline model scope. Can t add PAs that weren t in baseline, including previously not applicable PAs. Can t increase maturity levels or capability levels using a SCAMPI M appraisal. CMMI Working Group 9

Organizational Scope and Sampling (1 of 2) Basic Unit and Support Function Sampling Organizational scope is determined using SCAMPI A V1.3 MDD rules. Sampling factors beget subgroups which beget sample basic units and support functions. Sampled basic units and support functions may or may not be the same as those sampled in baseline SCAMPI A. All sampled basic units in each subgroup and support functions undergo Stage 1 high yield artifact review and determine model sample scope. Stage 2 data coverage is based upon applicable SCAMPI A V1.3 MDD rules applied to Stage 2 model sample scope. Coverage Rule 1 for Process Areas is not applicable by design of the SCAMPI M appraisal method. Process Area practice coverage is determined by SGs and GPs identified during Stage 1. CMMI Working Group 10

Organizational Scope and Sampling (2 of 2) Model Sampling Methodology Specific Goals and Generic Practices are identified in Stage 1 high yield artifact review for inclusion in Stage 2 sample scope (investigative sample). Random sample of SGs and GPs in model scope supplements investigative sampling performed. A minimum of 33% of SGs and GPs in model scope must be included in Stage 2 sample scope. At least two SGs must be selected by random sampling (even if investigative sample SGs are 33%. At least one SG from each Process Area Category (within model scope) must be included in the Stage 2 sample. At least one SG from each Maturity Level (within model scope) must be included in the Stage 2 sample. GPs identified for Stage 2 sample are sampled for all Process Areas with SGs in Stage 2 sample scope. CMMI Working Group 11

Characterizations and Ratings* (1 of 2) Sampled practices (SPs and GPs) are characterized using SCAMPI A V1.3 MDD rules. Specific Goal Rating Sampled SGs are rated using SCAMPI A V1.3 MDD rules. Generic Goals If the model sample scope contains just a subset of the generic goal s associated practices, and weaknesses identified in the sampled generic practices have a significant negative impact on goal achievement, the generic goal is rated Unsatisfied. Ratings of Satisfied or Not Rated do not apply to generic goals for which all associated practices are not contained in the model sample scope. * - Characterizations and Ratings slides in this presentation address staged representation and maturity levels. SCAMPI M also supports continuous representation and capability levels. CMMI Working Group 12

Characterizations and Ratings (2 of 2) If all sampled SGs are rated Satisfied, and no GGs are rated Unsatisfied The SCAMPI A maturity level rating can be extended. If any sampled SGs or GGs are rated Unsatisfied The SCAMPI A maturity rating cannot be extended, at which point two options are available: 1. The organization s maturity level rating is revoked. 2. The organization may undergo an Action Plan to address weaknesses that led to unsatisfied goals, and re-appraise the unsatisfied goals. CMMI Working Group 13

Action Plans Action Plan constraints: - ADS is submitted within 30 days of final findings indicating negative outcome and specifying an action plan is being implemented to address weaknesses. - Actions plan and reappraisal of goal-impacting weaknesses must be complete within 4 months of SCAMPI M final findings. - Once the action plan is completed, the appraisal team must re-characterize the practices and reappraise the previously unsatisfied goal(s). This must take place within the 4 month action plan window. - Successful completion of action plan (including reappraisal) extends SCAMPI A rating for 2 years. Revised ADS is submitted. If the action plan is not completed in the 4 month window, the SCAMPI A rating is revoked. If the action plan is not successfully completed prior to the current SCAMPI A rating expiration date, the current rating expires. CMMI Working Group 14

Team Qualifications (1 of 2) SCAMPI M Appraisal Team member qualifications are more stringent than SCAMPI A requirements Experienced team members able to reach accurate conclusions with less evidence SCAMPI A Minimum team size is 4, including the lead appraiser SCAMPI M Minimum team size is 2, including the lead appraiser Members of the appraised organization are allowed to be team members but the team must have a minimum of 2 team members external to the OU (including the lead appraiser). Team members complete Introductory to model course Average of 6 years field experience wrt reference model, aggregate of 10 yrs management experience, 1 team member with 6 yrs mgt. experience Aggregate of 25 years field experience Team members must have previous experience as appraisal team members on at least two SCAMPI A appraisals Each team member must have minimum of 6 yrs field experience, (including experience performing practices from the process areas that the team member is reviewing) N/A CMMI Working Group 15

Team Qualifications (2 of 2) High Maturity SCAMPI A Certified High Maturity Lead Appraiser (HMLA) All members of high maturity mini-team have high maturity experience HMLA or ATM with statistical analysis & other high maturity training assigned to high maturity mini-teams Team as a whole has collective experience implementing high maturity activities SCAMPI M Certified High Maturity Lead Appraiser (HMLA) Team members reviewing high maturity process areas must have been on a previous SCAMPI A high maturity appraisal At least one team member reviewing high maturity process areas must: have been on a previous SCAMPI A high maturity appraisal as part of a high maturity mini-team or be a certified HMLA who has been on a high maturity appraisal as lead or team member N/A CMMI Working Group 16

Summary Goal: Define a low cost SCAMPI Maintenance Appraisal method to extend the lifespan of a SCAMPI A rating without compromising rating integrity. Lower costs Less evidence collection and review by the organizational unit and appraisal team Fewer, but more experienced team members Fewer SCAMPI A appraisals performed just to maintain ratings. Action plan option to address weaknesses. without compromising integrity Organizational Unit has already undergone a recent baseline SCAMPI A appraisal Team member qualifications are more stringent than SCAMPI A V1.3 MDD team member qualifications Combines investigative sampling and random sampling of specific goals and generic practices. CMMI Working Group 17

For More Information. NDIA CMMI Working Group http://www.ndia.org/divisions/divisions/systemsengineering/pages/cmmi_working_group.aspx Jim Armstrong Stevens Institute Dan Blazer SAIC Michael Campo Raytheon Company Juliet Davis The Boeing Company Geoff Draper Harris Corporation Jeffrey L. Dutton Jacobs Technology Lisa Ming BAE Systems Wendell Mullison General Dynamics, Land Systems Kathy Smith Hewlett-Packard Rick Welch Northrop Grumman Dorna Witkowski Lockheed Martin CMMI Working Group 18