Figure Trickling Filter

Similar documents
Biofilm Reactor Technology and Design

Trickling Filters and Rotary Biological Contactors

CHAPTER 12 TRICKLING FILTER PLANTS

Sludge recycling (optional) Figure Aerobic lagoon

/ Marley MARPAK Modular Biomedia /

Secondary Wastewater Treatment

Sanitary and Environmental Engineering I (4 th Year Civil)

MARPAK modular biomedia WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Water and Wastewater Engineering Dr. Ligy Philip Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

19. AEROBIC SECONDARY TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER

Module 19 : Aerobic Secondary Treatment Of Wastewater. Lecture 24 : Aerobic Secondary Treatment Of Wastewater

IMPROVED BIO-TOWER TECHNOLOGY MUNICIPAL SEWAGE TREATMENT

American Water College 2010

ENVE 302 Environmental Engineering Unit Processes TRICKLING FILTERS ROTATING BILOGICAL CONTACTORS (RBC)

Module 20: Trickling Filters Answer Key

TRICKLING FILTERS by Dr. Moazzam Ali Khan

19. AEROBIC SECONDARY TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER

CEE 371 Water and Wastewater Systems

CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment

ECO Smart Aerobic Waste Water Treatment System. Optimising the re-use and recycling of waste water

Domestic Waste Water (Sewage): Collection, Treatment & Disposal

1/11/2016. Types and Characteristics of Microorganisms. Topic VI: Biological Treatment Processes. Learning Objectives:

New Developments in BioWin 5.3

13.8 SEWAGE TREATMENT FLOW SHEET

Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes II: MBBR Processes

EFFECT OF DISTRIBUTION NOZZLES ON TRICKLING FILTER PERFORMANCE

COLD WEATHER NITRIFICATION OF LAGOON EFFLUENT USING A MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR (MBBR) TREATMENT PROCESS

Module 19 : Aerobic Secondary Treatment Of Wastewater. Lecture 26 : Aerobic Secondary Treatment Of Wastewater (Contd.)

Biological Wastewater Treatment

- 1 - Retrofitting IFAS Systems In Existing Activated Sludge Plants. by Glenn Thesing

MBBR Wastewater Treatment Processes

Fixed-Film Processes

TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER. Outline 17/02/2019. Microbes and Biological Treatment. Teknologi Industri Pertanian. Universitas Brawijaya. 1.

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. Chemical Engineering department

Chapter 2: Conventional Wastewater Treatment (continue)

CEE 371 May 14, 2009 Final Exam

ATTACHMENT 1 GENERAL FACILITY INFORMATION. BOD5 mg/l mg/l TSS mg/l mg/l NH3-N mg/l mg/l

Module 17: The Activated Sludge Process - Part III Answer Key

Water and Wastewater Engineering Dr. Ligy Philip Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development

THE INFLUENCE OF CARRIER SIZE AND SHAPE IN THE MOVING BED BIOFILM PROCESS

Waste Water treatment

LITERATURE REVIEW CHAPTER Introduction. 2.2 Substrate removal in attached growth treatment process

Wastewater Tools: Activated Sludge and Energy Use Analysis

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

USE OF A ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY WASTEWATER TREATMENT

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR WITH POLYPROPYLENE AND WOOL MEDIA

Proprietary AquaTron technology incorporates three (3) innovative features that increase its efficiency and reduces cost:

SECTION-I. b) Write a short note on pumping of savage. 4

Course: Wastewater Management

Module 22 : Sludge Management

Best Practice in Sewage and Effluent Treatment Technologies

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

Determination of design criteria for UASB reactors as a wastewater pretreatment system in tropical small communities

Compact Waste Water Treatment MBR /MBBR Technology

Utilizing algal oxygen production for advanced wastewater treatment in a Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) the Biologically Aerated Reactor (BAR )

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Bloomingdale WWTF Private/Public Partnership Works. Bob Wilcox, PE Fleis & VandenBrink May 10, 2016

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

NC-PC Industry Day Pretreatment 101. Industrial Waste Impacts on POTW Treatment Processes. Dawn Padgett Operations Manager Charlotte Water

Attached Growth Biological Systems

Aerobic Treatment Units

Bio-Lair for Water Remediation

chapter-3- treatment processes

Coupling Trickling Filter or RBC s with Activated Sludge

Advantages & Applications of MBBR Technologies

Waste water treatment Biological treatment

Using Compact Combined Constructed Wetland as Post Treatment for Biogas Wastewater

COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS), MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) AND CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE (AS) PROCESSES

Anaerobic reactor development for complex organic wastewater

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Wastewater Pollutants & Treatment Processes. Dr. Deniz AKGÜL Marmara University Department of Environmental Engineering

University Curriculum Development for Decentralized Wastewater Management. Aerobic Treatment of Wastewater and Aerobic Treatment Units

SBR PROCESS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

Dissolved Oxygen (DO):

Physical water/wastewater treatment processes

Packaged Wastewater Treatment Systems for Individual Homes and Small Communities. Mark Gross Orenco Systems, Inc. Sutherlin, OR USA.

At the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection

REMOVAL OF ORGANIC MATTER IN WASTEWATERS OF A MILK FACTORY AND A HOSPITAL USING A CUBIC LATTICE BASED ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR IN VIETNAM

Module 20: Trickling Filters

ANAEROBIC SLUDGE DIGESTION PROCESS. Prepared By Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Operator Training and Certification Unit

Sanitary Sewer Systems. Sewage Collection System. Types of Sewage 10/12/2016. General Overview

Traditional Treatment

FEASIBILITY REPORT OF 250 KLD SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT

New Developments in BioWin 4.0

Case History: Anaerobic and Aerobic Treatment of Textile Wastes at South Carolina Textile Plants. Introduction

Diederik Rousseau Tineke Hooijmans. Anaerobic wastewater treatment

Palmer Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Impacts. A summary of the impacts of this treatment alternative are listed below:

The difference in unit processes for a traditional on-lot wastewater treatment system compared to the AdvanTex Treatment System

NITROGEN REMOVAL USING SATURATED UPFLOW WOODY FIBER MEDIA. Larry D. Stephens, P.E. 1

EHS SMART-Treat Onsite Moving Media Treatment System

Winery FAST & Floating FAST

BIOTRANSFORMATION OF SEWAGE IN A TRICKLING FILTER

Reed Bed Treatment Solutions and Forced Bed Aeration

A SUBMERGED ATTACHED GROWTH BIOREACTOR FOR DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER TREATMENT

START-UP OF TRICKLING FILTERS USING NOVEL FILTER MEDIUM UNDER LOW TEMPERATURE CONDITIONS

UPGRADING GAZA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT. Gaza City is populated with 550,000 inhabitants and it forms 45% of the Gaza strip population.

Transcription:

19.2 Trickling Filter A trickling filter is a fixed film attached growth aerobic process for treatment of organic matter from the wastewater. The surface of the bed is covered with the biofilm and as the wastewater trickles over this media surface, organic matter from the wastewater comes in contact with the aerobic bacteria and oxidation of organic matter occurs. In the past rock was used as a bed material with size ranging from 25 mm to 100 mm. Now plastic media which offers higher surface area per unit volume is used. The media is randomly packed in the reactor and the wastewater is applied on the top through rotary arm which trickles down over the filter media surface (Figure 19.12). Hence, this reactor is known as trickling filter. Since, the wastewater is applied through the rotary arm from the top of the reactor the biofilm grown on the media surface receives wastewater intermittently. As the wastewater trickles down leaving the wet biofilm, the biofilm is exposed to the air voids present in the media, and thus oxygen from the air, after solubalizing in the water adhering on biofilm, is made available to aerobic bacteria grown in the biofilm by diffusion of oxygen through the biofilm. The end product CO 2 diffuses out of the biofilm into the flowing liquid. Treated wastewater is collected from the bottom of the bed through an underdrainage system and is settled in the final settling tank. Rotary Distributor Filter media Filter media under drainage System feed pipe effluent channel Figure 19.12 Trickling Filter

The biological film or slime forms on the surface of the filter media after application of wastewater. Organic matter is adsorbed on the slime layer and it is degraded by the aerobic microorganisms present in the slime. As the thickness of the slime layer increases the condition near the surface of the media becomes anaerobic because of limitations of availability of oxygen. At this stage the microbes lose their ability to cling to the surface of the media and the slime layer gets detached and washed out along with flowing liquid. This phenomenon is called as sloughing. Soon after the sloughing the new slime layer formation starts. Hence secondary sedimentation tank (SST) is provided to settle this washed out biomass. SST can be circular or rectangular tanks designed such that the overflow rate at peak flow should not exceed 50 m 3 /m 2.d. Diameter of the trickling filter depends on the mechanical equipments used for spraying the wastewater. Diameter more than 12 m for single filter unit is common. Rotary arm rotates as a result of jet action as the wastewater is sprayed horizontally on the filter bed; hence, external power is not required for rotation of the arm. However, for trickling filter of small diameter (less than 6 m) power driven rotary arm may be provided. Number of commercial packing media is available. These include vertical-flow random packed and cross flow media made of rock, polygrid, plastic media or asbestos sheets. In order to avoid filter plugging, a maximum specific surface of 100 m 2 /m 3 is recommended for carbonaceous wastewater treatment and up to 300 m 2 /m 3 for nitrification, because of slow growth rate of nitrifiers. Overall performance of the trickling filter depends upon the hydraulic and organic loading rate, wastewater ph, operating temperature and availability of air through natural draft within the pores, and mean time of contact of wastewater with biofilm, etc. Mean time of contact of liquid with the filter surface is related to the filter depth, hydraulic loading rate and nature of filter packing. This contact time can be estimated as (Eckenfelder, 2000): T = C.D/Q n (37) Where T = mean detention time, D = depth of filter bed, Q is the hydraulic loading m 3 /m 2.d, C and n are constant related to specific surface area and configuration of the packing. Mean

retention time increases considerably (up to 4 times) with formation of biofilm as compared to new filter media. Based on hydraulic and organic loadings, the trickling filters may be classified as (1) Low rate trickling filter (Figure 19.13a) and (2) High rate trickling filter (Figure 19.13b). Recirculation is employed in high rate filters to improve efficiency. The recirculation helps in providing seeding to the filter bed and also dilutes the strong wastewater. Dilution is the major objective behind the recirculation. From PST TF SST Effluent (a) Sludge Effluent return PST TF SST To digester Effluent Sludge return (b) Figure 19.13 (a) Low rate trickling filter and (b) High rate trickling filter Super rate trickling filter: It is also called as roughing filter or biotower. Plastic media is used in this filter. Since the power required in trickling filter per unit of BOD removal is less as compared to ASP, these are becoming popular these days. They are used ahead of the existing trickling filter or ASP and are generally constructed above ground. The diameter of the biotower can vary from 3 m to 70 m. The walls of the biotower can be made from RCC or when modular plastic media is used the walls can be made from the plastic, since there is no hydrostatic pressure on the walls. Air blower may be provided in addition to natural air draft in biotower to enhance oxygen resources of the system to handle higher organic loading rates. 19.2.1 Additional Information on Trickling Filter

Sludge retention: The sludge is retained in the trickling filter for very long time as compared to ASP and typically the mean cell residence time (θc) of 100 days or more can be achieved. Estimation of actual biomass present in the reactor is difficult hence exact measurement of θc is not possible. Excess sludge generation in this process is expected to be lower due to longer retention time of biomass supporting endogenous decay. The sludge generation is 60 to 70% lower than that of ASP treating same wastewater. The sludge generation in high rate trickling filter is more than low rate trickling filter. Air supply: Air is supplied in low rate and high rate trickling filter through natural draft. In trickling filter when wastewater temperature is less than ambient temperature there will be downward flow of air; whereas, when the wastewater temperature is more than ambient temperature there will be upward flow of air. To allow air circulation, the under-drainage system should be designed to flow not more than half full. Details of the rotary arm: It rotates with the speed of 0.5 to 2 revolutions per minute. The peripheral speed for two arm system will be 0.5 to 4 m/min. The arm length could be as low as 3 m to as high as 35 m depending on the diameter of the filter. This rotary arm delivers the wastewater 15 cm above the filter bed. The velocity of wastewater moving through arm should be more than 0.3 m/s to prevent deposition of solids. Numbers of ports, generally of equal diameter, are provided on this arm to deliver wastewater in horizontal direction. Minimum 2 arms are provided, whereas they could be 4 in numbers. Design guidelines for the trickling filters are provided in the Table 19.1. Table 19.1 Design values for trickling filters Parameter Low rate trickling filter High rate trickling filter Super rate roughing filter Hydraulic loading, m 3 /m 2.d 1-4 10-40 40 200 Volumetric loading, kg BOD/m 3.d 0.11 0.37 0.37 to 1.85 1.0 6.0 Depth, m 1.5 3.0 1.0 2.0 4 12 Recirculation ratio 0 1-4 1-4 Power requirement, kw/10 3 m 3 2-4 6-10 10 20 Dosing intervals Less than 5 min. 15 to 60 seconds Continuous Sloughing Intermittent Continuous Continuous Effluent quality Fully nitrified Nitrified only at low loading Nitrified only at low loading

19.2.2 Design of Trickling Filters Organic loading rate and recirculation ratio are main consideration in design of trickling filter. The early performance equations for trickling filter were empirical as proposed by National Research Council (1946), Rankin (1955) and based on biochemical kinetics Velz (1948). Rankine s formula For single stage filters: the BOD of influent to the filter (including recirculation) shall not exceed three times the BOD required for settled effluent. Hence referring to the Figure 19.13 and using following notations, we have S 2 + R 1 (S 4 ) = 3 (1 + R 1 )S 4 (38) Or S 4 = S 2 /(3 + 2R 1 ) (39) Where S 2 = BOD of settled influent, S 4 = BOD of TF effluent after SST, R 1 = Recirculation ratio, and if E = efficiency, then E = (1 + R 1 )/(1.5 + R 1 ) (40) Value of recirculation is given by R = (Q 1 Q)/Q (41) Where Q 1 is total flow including recirculation and Q is sewage flow. For second stage filter: The BOD of the wastewater applied to the second stage filter including recirculation shall not exceed two times the effluent BOD. Therefore, S 4 + R 4 (S 6 ) = 2 (1 + R 2 )S 6 (42) Or S 6 = S 4 / (R 2 + 3) and efficiency = (1 + R 2 )/(2 + R 2 ) (43) Where S 4 = BOD of influent to second stage filter, S 6 = BOD of TF effluent after SST, R 2 = Recirculation ratio.

Eckenfelder (1970) has developed performance equation based on the specific rate of substrate removal for a pseudo-first-order reaction. - = K.S (44) Where = Specific rate of substrate utilization, M T = rate of substrate utilization, V T K = rate constant, T S = Substrate concentration, V Rearranging the above equation (44) for integration, t o = -K X (45) X = Average cell mass concentration, V S o = Substrate concentration applied for filter bed S t = Substrate concentration after contact time, t Integrating the equation t o =.. (46) X is proportional to surface area of the media (A s ) i.e., X A s m (47) Where, A s is the specific area of the packing media The mean contact time t for a filter is given by Howland (1950) (Reynolds & Richard, 1996). t =. (48) Where t = mean contact time

D = Depth of filter bed Q L = Surface loading C and n = constant Substituting equation 46 & 47 in equation 48 m s t = o (49) (Elimination of constant C as it is taken into account in K) m = experimental constant The value of n depends on flow characteristics through packing and usually about 0.5 to 0.67. m For specific wastewater and filter media equation 49 may be simplified by combining s to give (50) K= 0.01 to 0.1 for various wastewater and media For Surfpac, Dow chemical (89 m 2 /m 3 ), K = 0.088 and n = 0.5 (Reynolds & Richard, 1996) When D- feet, Q L = gal/(min-ft 2 ). Actual K values can be determined from the pilot performance. With temperature variation the value of K can be converted as below: K T = K 20 x 1.035 (T-20) (51) K T = rate constant at temperature T K 20 = rate constant at 20 C T= temperature, C One of the most common kinetic equations for filter performance while treating municipal wastewater was developed by Eckenfelder, 1961 as t o = S t = BOD 5 of effluent, mg/l 0.67. (52)

S o = BOD 5 of influent, mg/l C = constant = 2.5 for FPS unit and 5.358 for SI units D = filter depth, ft (m) Q L = unit loading rate MG/acre-day (m 3 /m 2 -d) The above equation is obtained from second order kinetics equation, = KS2 (53) Integrating S t S o = S 0. K.X. (54) Substituting, t = C D0.67 Q L 0.5 and combining constant S o, K, X & C for the same wastewater treatment under steady state performance results, the equation becomes: t o 0.67. (55)