Method Development for Direct Analysis of Mercury by Thermal Decomposition. David L. Pfeil

Similar documents
SMS 100 MERCURY ANALYZER SMS 100. Mercury analysis directly on solid samples from the undisputed leader in Atomic Spectroscopy

Your Technology Resource

Application Note AN1501

Determination of Organic Mercury and Inorganic Sediment, Soil and Aquatic Organisms by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

Evaluation of the Mercury Concentration Accessory for US EPA Methodology

Application Note. Mercury Determination at Ultra-Trace Concentration Using the 906 Elite AAS and MC3000 Mercury Concentrator.

FMA-80 Fluorescence Mercury Analyzer

D.9 Particulate Nitrogen and Particulate Carbon

REPORT NUMBER REPORT DATE SEND TO ISSUE DATE Apr 18, Apr 18, 2017 RECEIVED DATE Apr 05, 2017

THE USE OF MICROWAVE TECHNOLOGY FOR DRY ASHING PROCEDURES. by S. E. Carr and C. R. Moser. CEM Corporation, Matthews, North Carolina.

Methods for determination of mercury in LP gas

Carbon / Hydrogen / Sulfur Analyzers

METHOD #: Approved for NPDES and SDWA (Issued 1974) Mercury (Automated Cold Vapor Technique) ANALYTE: CAS # Hg Mercury

DR/4000 PROCEDURE. OXYGEN DEMAND, Chemical. Colorimetric Measurement, 0 to 40 mg/l COD

METHOD #: Approved for NPDES and SDWA (Issued 1974) Mercury (Manual Cold Vapor Technique) ANALYTE: CAS # Hg Mercury

Hydra II AF. and Hydra II AF Gold. The World s Most Sensitive Mercury Analyzers. Hg Analyzers. ICP Spectrometers. Inorganic Standards

The Release of Base Metals During Acidic Leaching of Fly Ash

Don t Settle for just any Mercury Analyzer...Go with the Experts in Mercury Analysis...Go with Teledyne Leeman Labs

Carbon / Sulfur Analyzer CS-2000

Innovative. Intuitive. Concentration (ppb) R = Versatile. Hydra II AA Mercury Analyzer

Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (FAAS) Brand : PERKINALMER Model : PinAAcle 900T Custodian : PRADUP MESAWAT SOOKRUTHAI WONGSUBIN

Carbon / Sulfur Analyzer ELEMENTRAC CS-i

An Innovative Approach for Mercury Capture

Perkin Elmer HGA-600/ HGA-700 Graphite Furnaces

METHOD 7550 OSMIUM (ATOMIC ABSORPTION, DIRECT ASPIRATION)

Carbon / Sulfur Analyzers

FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT September 1, 2004, through July 31, 2006

Total Cyanide using UV Digestion and Amperometric Detection (ASTM D e Equivalent Method)

Data Pack. Methods for the Determination of Cyanide Using Amperometric Detection. June 2008

// XPLORER-NS. Full range Total Nitrogen, Total Sulfur instrument for the modern Laboratory.

Continuous Mercury Monitoring at Cement Plant

Duke Energy Seminar September 3 5, 2008 Concord, NC

Hydrogen Sulphide and Mercaptan Removal

The following are the completed but unbalanced equations. Each equation is numbered to match each step of the cycle:

The Determination of Toxic Metals in Waters and Wastes by Furnace Atomic Absorption

Cobalt, atomic absorption spectrophotometry, graphite furnace

NATIONAL STANDARD OF THE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (Zhenghua Renmin Gongheguo Guojia Biaozhun)

Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry ISSN Available online at

Release of Mercury Vapor from Coal Combustion Ash

The Determination of Trace Elements in Stainless Steel by Forked Platform GFAAS

BCURA B73 Research Contract

Omya Water & Energy omya.com. Flue Gas Cleaning. Sustainable and efficient flue gas desulfurization (FGD)

DR/4000 PROCEDURE. OXYGEN DEMAND, Chemical. Colorimetric Measurement

Sorbents Evaluation Testing Facilities. 95% removal efficiency or an emission standard of lbs/gw h by 2012, while

Volatile Organic Compounds in Solids PBM

Biofuels GS 2 Measuring Course Part II, DTU, Feb 2 6, 2009 Experiments in the entrained flow reactor

Energy Production Systems Engineering

Elemental Analysis (EA)

// XPLORER-NS. Full range Total Nitrogen, Total Sulfur instrument for the modern Laboratory.

Use of FGD Gypsum in Agricultural Applications

Modified Draft Indian Standard METHODS FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF STEELS

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ANALYSIS III

Aluminium Determinations in Parenteral Solutions

Bottom Ash Data Week 52

Determination of Mercury in Solids

DRAFT EAST AFRICAN STANDARD

Sequential soil washing techniques using hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide for remediating arsenic-contaminated soils in abandoned iron-ore mines

This method is applicable to the following parameters: Nitric Hydrochloric acid digestion, Instrumental analysis.

SEMI C SPECIFICATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR HYDROGEN PEROXIDE

Method 108C - Determination of Arsenic Content in Ore Samples From Nonferrous Smelters (Molybdenum Blue Photometric Procedure)

Simplicity. Accuracy. Durability. Lotix. Automated High Temperature Combustion TOC Analyzer

EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY

Bottom Ash Data Week 45

National Food Safety Standard

IRON (Colorimetric) 2. Muffle Furnace: Equipped with pyrometer and capable of operating at controlled temperatures up to 600 C

FINAL REPORT: June 30, Advanced Technology Systems, Inc. 639 Alpha Drive Pittsburgh, PA 15238

Background The document will be revised for its five year review and updated per the committee agreed upon changes.

Method Metals by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy and Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy. September 1989

Fluorine and Chlorine in Cu concentrates and ores by Metrohm Combustion IC

SEMI C SPECIFICATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR AMMONIUM HYDROXIDE

Standard Operating Procedure Title: Operation and Calibration of Sievers 820 TOC Analyser

Application of CFB (Circulating Fluidized Bed) to Sewage Sludge Incinerator

Characterization and recovery of mercury from spent fluorescent lamps

Supplier of Analytical Instrumentation. Analytix Product Portfolio

Strong Acid Leachable Metals (SALM) in Soil - Prescriptive

Bottom Ash Data Week 47

Oxygen Demand, Chemical

SOP-C-130 Determination of Total Solids and Percent Solids

Chapter Five Waste Processing, Treatment and Recycling Joe Green Dr Chris Wooldridge Cardiff University

Oxygen Demand, Chemical

Environmental Water Testing: Surface Water, Groundwater, Hard Water, Wastewater, & Seawater

EXTRACTION OF BIOLOGICAL TISSUES FOR AROMATIC AND CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS

AIR. Ambient, Indoor, Workplace Air and Stack Emissions Proficiency Testing Scheme Version 1 Issue Date 18/09/2018

GB (GB/T )

Measurement of mercury flux from coal utilization byproducts with a laboratory flux chamber

The Right Analytical Method for the Right Application: TOC Analysis for Cleaning Validation

WET ANALYSIS OF GOLD-SILVER ALLOYS OF HIGH GOLD CONTENT 1

Accurate determination of trace elements emissions using AFS. Dr Warren Corns. Coal Research Forum 2016 PSA. Slide 1

Chlorine promotes antimony volatilization in municipal waste incineration

Elemental Analyzer Consumables Our products are intimately involved with your samples

If you like us, please share us on social media. The latest UCD Hyperlibrary newsletter is now complete, check it out.

Preliminary evaluation of NaClO 2 powder injection method for mercury oxidation: Bench scale experiment using iron-ore sintering flue gas

Radial, Axial or Dual View ICP: Which Do You Choose? Manny Almeida Teledyne Leeman Labs, Inc. Hudson, NH

Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements Community Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives

METHOD 9013A CYANIDE EXTRACTION PROCEDURE FOR SOLIDS AND OILS

Direct Determination of Thallium in Water by Pre-concentration with the PinAAcle 900H GFAAS

Some Basic Concepts of Chemistry

Angel International School - Manipay 1 st Term Examination November, 2017

TruePeak TDLS200. NH 3 Slip Measurement. <Document Number> Copyright Yokogawa Electric Corporation <date/time>

Background Statement for SEMI Draft Document 4546A REVISION OF SEMI C , with title change to SPECIFICATIONS FOR HYDROGEN PEROXIDE

Transcription:

Method Development for Direct Analysis of Mercury by Thermal Decomposition David L. Pfeil dpfeil@teledyne.com 1

Webinar Topics How does thermal decomposition work? When does it make sense to use this technique? Applicable methods Instrumentation Concerns about samples Method development strategies Some examples 2

Hydra C - Principle of Operation Solid or liquid samples are weighed and introduced in the Hydra C The sample is initially dried and then thermally decomposed in an oxygen flow Combustion products are carried off and further decomposed in a hot catalyst bed Mercury vapors are trapped on a gold amalgamator and subsequently desorbed for quantitation The mercury content is determined using atomic absorption

Hydra II C System Schematic Absorption Cells High Sensitivity Low Sensitivity 50-900 C 600 C Decomposition Furnace Catalyst Furnace Drying Tube Amalgam Furnace Delay Tube O 2 Supply

When is Thermal Decomposition Most Useful? The analysis of solids such as: Soils, sediments & sludge Coal & fly ash Fish Food & feeds Plants & tissues Ores Difficult to digest samples Samples with known chemical interferences 5

Benefits of Thermal Decomposition Fast turnaround time More universal calibration Interference reduction Better sensitivity for solids No hazardous chemicals used 6

Time Required for CVAA Sample Digestion

Time Required for Direct Analysis

Reference Materials as Standards Sediment Sediments Coal Dogfish Oyster tissue Dogfish High Sensitivity Range Correlation Coef. 0.9993 Low Sensitivity Range Correlation Coef. 0.9996

Standard Reference Materials SAMPLE No. Certificate Measured Recovery Tissue (ppm) (ppm) (%) Bovine Liver 1577 0.016 0.0178 111.7 Blood Lypho 1 0.096 0.091 94.8 Lypho 2 0.039 0.036 90.9 Lypho 3 0.073 0.067 91.4 Marine Dogfish Dorm-2 4.64 4.34 93.5 Dogfish Dolt-2 1.99 1.79 90 Oyster Tissue 1566 0.057 0.061 107 Sediments & Soils Coal 8406 0.06 0.061 101.7 2709 1.4 1.52 108.6 HC-35150 0.176 0.177 100.6

Interference Reduction Because the CVAAS technique requires a chemical reduction and the thermal decomposition technique does not, some interferences can be eliminated. Interference with KI Interference with Au 120 120 Recovery (%) 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 1 2 3 KI (%) CVAAS Thermal Decomp Recovery (%) 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 100 200 300 Au Conc. (ppm) CVAAS Thermal Decomp 11

Detection Limits Comparison Typical published detection limits Classical CVAAS ~1 ng/l CVAFS ~0.1ng/L CVAFS with amalgam <0.05 ng/l Thermal Decomposition 0.005-0.001ng Detection Limits in concentration for thermal decomposition Divide the mass detection limit by the sample weight For Example: Assume the reported detection limit is 0.002ng and the sample weight is 0.2grams. Detection limit = 0.002ng/0.2g = 0.01ng/g (ppb) 12

Apples to Apples Typical published detection limits Classical CVAAS CVAFS CVAFS with amalgam ~1 ng/l or ~0.001ng/g (ppb) ~0.1ng/L or ~0.0005ng/g <0.05 ng/l - For solid samples dilution with required digestion is not taken into account. - Often 50-100X dilution is required and the method detection limit will be higher For Example: Assume 2.0g of sample is digested to a final volume of 100mls (or ~100g). CVAAS Detection limit = (0.001ng/g)(100mls) /(2g) = 0.05ng/g (ppb) Compare with 0.01ng/g by thermal decomposition for 0.2g sample 13

Chemicals Needed for CVAAS Acids Nitric Hydrochloric Sulfuric Oxidizers Potassium permanganate Potassium persulfate Reductants Hydroxylamine Stannous chloride Sodium borohydride Personnel safety Gloves Eye protection Ventilation Expense Purchase price Disposal costs Contamination Extra sample handling Reagent purity 14

Applicable Methods USEPA 7473 Mercury In Solids and Solutions by Thermal Decomposition, Amalgamation, and Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry ASTM D6722 Standard Test Method for Total Mercury in Coal and Coal Combustion Residues by Direct Combustion Analysis 15

Instrumentation Hydra II C Modular Design Furnace Spectrometer Autosampler 16

Hydra II C - AA Spectrometer Folding Mirrors Reference Cell High Sensitivity Cell Low Sensitivity Cell Lamp Module

Low Concentrations Measurement of real samples Contamination can be significant Boats Analyst Environment Sample homogeneity 18

Dryer / Amalgamator Module Gold Amalgamation Trap Nafion Dryer Interface to Furnace Interface to Control Board

High Concentrations Long (2 x5 ) & Short Cell (1 ) come standard High Concentration option is unique 1,500ng max or 25,000ng max

Catalyst Sample boat enters empty part of catalyst tube First section captures catalyst poisons such as sulfur and halogens Second section provides oxygen to assist combustion Third section traps partially oxidized residuals 21

Sample Concerns Homogeneity Is the aliquot measured representative of the sample? Can I get acceptable precision? How much sample is needed? Flash point, if combustible We are placing fuel & oxygen in a sealed vessel Volatility Will evaporation on the sampler affect accuracy? Concentration High or low concentrations may not fall in the analytical range Moisture Samples must be dried before the decomposition step Physical condition of sample Is the sample contained in the boat 22

Do we need to perform sample preparation? You might want to grind your samples to get a more uniform consistency For something like soils or plant material a simple coffee grinder might suffice Cost ~$20 23

Combustible materials What is combustible In an oxygen atmosphere materials are more combustible than you might at first imagine Start small Control the amount of fuel added to the furnace Explosive conditions can exist when fuel and oxidant are present in the right ratio If you know the sample is combustible, try to keep the mass under 20ugs Use multiple deposits to increase the signal, if necessary 24

Multiple Injections To deposit more volatile sample mass multiple injections are typically offered in the software. Less mass of a sample is placed in each boat With each sample boat injection only the dry and combustion phases are carried out Only after the last injection the mercury is eluted and measured Concentration is calculated based on the total mass injected in all the boats 25

Example of Multiple Deposits Total deposit = 1.077gm 26

What is volatile? If the mercury species is volatile (or reactive), then results will be low if left on the sampler. Some acidic solutions can react with nickel boats, reducing mercury. If a solvent is employed with the sample but the mercury species is stable, loading the sampler should be acceptable. If unsure, run a sample directly after loading and repeat at various time intervals checking precision 27

Sample concentrations out of range Low concentrations Inject more sample Use multiple deposits to increase mass of mercury loaded High concentrations Inject less sample Analytical error during weighing Homogeneity concerns Dilution is difficult in solids Suitable blank material available? Digest the sample Liquid samples are easy to dilute 28

Moisture Control for Aqueous Samples As a rule of thumb allow 0.7 seconds of dry time for every microliter of solution. With a sample capacity of 1.4ml the dry time can be quite tedious 1400 x 0.7 = 980 seconds ( or >16 minutes) On the other hand solid samples may require little or no dry time 29

Physical limitations Difficult to contain samples types can be wrapped in a suitable material such as aluminum foil Hair Feathers Glass wool Sticky stuff needs to be transported carefully Previously frozen fish tissues 30

Method Development Strategies View from 30,000 feet Characterize your samples Determine sufficient dry time Run a small sample aliquot Estimate sample mass needed for mid-range concentration Evaluate response characteristics Determine precision Adjust decomposition values, if necessary Determine accuracy 31

The Pyrolysis Phase After the sample is dry, furnace temperature increases for sample pyrolysis or combustion. To satisfactorily complete this step sufficient oxygen must be present. Organic compounds require more oxygen More mass deposited requires more oxygen Multiple deposits may help reach complete oxidation Determination of Hg in rice is a good example 32

Coal & Fly Ash Coal and fly ash are typically two of the easier matrices to analyze by thermal decomposition; however, some coals high in sulfur may shorten catalyst lifetimes. Coal Phase Temperature ( C) Time (s) Drying 300 60 Decomposition 800 400 Catalyst 600 Wait Time 60 Amalgamator 600 30 Notes: If moisture is high extend Drying Time Use nickel boats Calibrate on aqueous or matrix matched standards 33

Plant tissue Plant material may be best handled by pre-desiccation and grinding to a consistent particle size; however, satisfactory results often may be obtained without any pretreatment. Plants Phase Temperature ( C) Time (s) Drying 300 0.7*mgs Decomposition 800 160 Catalyst 600 Wait Time 60 Amalgamator 600 30 Notes: Set dry time to 0.7 sec/mg sample weight if not desiccated. Use nickel boats Calibrate on aqueous or matrix matched standards 34

Soil Soil can contain plant roots and large rocks. It may make sense to sieve and/or grind the soils to exclude these materials. Soil Phase Temperature ( C) Time (s) Drying 300 10 Decomposition 850 180 Catalyst Temperature 600 Wait Time 60 Amalgamator 600 30 35

Soil Sample Untreated After Grinding 36

Fish Fish is recognized as the primary source of mercury adsorption in humans. The FDA has a recommended concentration limit for Hg at 1ppm. The limit in much of Europe is set at 0.5ppm Fish Phase Temperature ( C) Time (s) Drying 300 45 Decomposition 800 150 Catalyst Temperature 600 Wait Time 60 Amalgamator 600 30 37

Rice Many grains, such as rice, are dietary staples and while routinely low in Hg may deserve monitoring. Rice Phase Temperature ( C) Time (s) Drying 300 60 Decomposition 800 400 Catalyst Temperature 600 Wait Time 60 Amalgamator 600 30 Note-limited mass required ( 50mg) 38

Oils We have looked at a variety of oils Used engine oils, Vegetable oil Marine oil The decomposition phase is hotter & longer than usual to prevent incomplete decomposition. Oils Phase Temperature ( C) Time (s) Drying 100 60 Decomposition 800 200 Catalyst Temperature 600 Wait Time 60 Amalgamator 600 30 39

Hair Hair can be an excellent indicator of past exposure to mercury. Clean sample before clipping Wrap in tin foil to control positioning Hair Phase Temperature ( C) Time (s) Drying 300 60 Decomposition 800 150 Catalyst Temperature 600 Wait Time 60 Amalgamator 600 30 40

Blood & Urine Urine can be used to determine recent exposure to inorganic mercury. Blood can be used to determine recent exposure to organic mercury Fluid Phase Temperature ( C) Time (s) Drying 300 60 Decomposition 800 150 Catalyst Temperature 600 Wait Time 60 Amalgamator 600 30 41

Waters Waters can be determined by thermal decomposition but: Slow because of moisture removal Less sensitive than classical CVAAS Water Phase Temperature ( C) Time (s) Drying 300 TBD Decomposition 800 150 Catalyst Temperature 600 Wait Time 60 Amalgamator 600 30 42

A Single Platform AA C All run with Envoy 2.0 Software AF AFGold 43

Sodium Hydroxide Solution Sodium hydroxide solutions unstable in the sample boat. Acidified solutions are stable. In our experiments we have used 6N HCl NaOH Phase Temperature ( C) Time (s) Drying 300 TBD Decomposition 800 150 Catalyst Temperature 600 Wait Time 60 Amalgamator 600 30 44

Gypsum Synthetic gypsum used in the production of wallboard a byproduct of many coal-fired power plants using flue gas desulfurization (FGD). As coal plant emissions become cleaner, concern is increasing in byproducts, like gypsum. Gypsum Phase Temperature ( C) Time (s) Drying 300 70 Decomposition 800 150 Catalyst Temperature 600 Wait Time 60 Amalgamator 600 30 45

Gypsum from one Power Plant A mean concentration of 170ng/g Hg 7.5 million tons of gypsum # is used in the production of wallboard About 2,500lbs of mercury re-introduced into the environment. Hg/yr = (0.170x10-6 lbs/lbs)(7.5x10 6 ton/yr)(2000lbs/ton) =2,550lbs Hg/yr # Based on ACAA 2006 Coal Combustion Product (CCP) Production and Use Survey 7,579,187 short tons used in wallboard production 46

In Summary Very short turn-around time for results. Greener technique with no digestion chemicals or waste products. Generic calibration for multiple matrices. Wide dynamic range but dilution is impractical. Multiple deposits for lower concentrations. Sensitivity better than classical CVAAS for solids, not quite as good for liquids. Combo systems 47

Questions????? 48