Process Monitoring for Biological and Chemical Nutrient Removal

Similar documents
An Innovative Approach to Retrofitting for Nitrogen Removal

On-Line Nutrient Monitoring-Operator s Job Got Easier

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

Nutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP

James Winslade Instructor, Environmental Resources Training Center Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville

Presentation Outline

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

Operation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP

Analytical Instrumentation for Wastewater Monitoring

A Battle to Be the Best: A Comparison of Two Powerful Sidestream Treatment Technologies: Post Aerobic Digestion and Anammox

2015 Spring Conference

ENHANCED BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHIN MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS. 255 Consumers Road Toronto, ON, Canada, M2J 5B6

Design, Construction and Startup of the First Enhanced Nutrient Removal Plant in Maryland Funded by the Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund

Overview of Supplemental Carbon Sources for Denitrification and Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PLUS CHEMICAL POLISHING FOR LOW LEVEL COMPLIANCE

Meeting SB1 Requirements and TP Removal Fundamentals

A Review of the Current State of Knowledge on Phosphorus Removal

Bioprocess Intelligent Operating System -Beyond Ammonia Control-

20 Years of Nutrient Removal City of Beloit

RE ENGINEERING O&M PRACTICES TO GET NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHOUT FACILITY UPGRADES

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.

NITROGEN REMOVAL GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET COMPANY. Create Optimal Habitats

Refinement of Nitrogen Removal from Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants

A Critical New Look at Nutrient Removal Processes

OWEA Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Upgrading WRFs for Biological Nutrient Removal. June 25, 2015

THE SEQUENCED AERATION PROCESS MONTAGUE, MASSACHUSETTS

Oxidation Ditch Technologies

Optimizing Nutrient Removal. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

Efficient Design Configurations for Biological Nutrient Removal

Chapter 4: Advanced Wastewater Treatment for Phosphorous Removal

Biological Phosphorus Removal

OCTOBER 31, NAMI Environmental Conference BEST PRACTICES: IMPROVING WW SYSTEMS

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

OPTIMIZING THE OPERATION OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES GRANT WEAVER, PE & WASTEWATER OPERATOR WEBINAR MARCH 18, 2014

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL AN OPERATOR S GUIDE

Emerging Issues in the Water/Wastewater Industry. Austin s Full-Scale Step-BNR Demonstration

Biological Phosphorous Removal Is Coming! Michigan Water Environment Association Annual Conference, June 23, 2008; Boyne Falls MI

Performance Evaluation of the Moores Creek Advanced Water Resource Recovery Facility

Oxidation Ditch Technologies WATER TECHNOLOGIES

Secondary Treatment Process Control

HYDRA Ammonium & HYDRA Nitrate Analyzers

The following biological nutrient removal processes were evaluated in detail in the 2016 Liquid Processing Facilities Plan:

JB Neethling HDR Engineering

A Roadmap for Smarter Nutrient Management in a Carbon and Energy Constrained World. Samuel Jeyanayagam, PhD, PE, BCEE

Energy Neutral Opportunities

JTAC Presentation May 18, Nutrient Removal Process Fundamentals and Operation

A Novel Testing Approach for BNR Optimization in NYC. Vera Gouchev, P.E. January 23, 2017 NEWEA 2017 Annual Conference

INTRODUCTION TO NUTRIENT CONTROL FOR SMALL COMMUNITIES NUTRIENTS 101

CE421/521 Environmental Biotechnology. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycles Lecture Tim Ellis

Upgrade of an Oxidation Ditch Using Bio-Mass Carriers

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part I

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Simultaneous Nutrient Removal: Quantification, Design, and Operation. Leon Downing, Ph.D., PE Donohue & Associates

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PROVEN METHODS FOR UPGRADING YOUR FACILITIES

CSR Process Simulations Can Help Municipalities Meet Stringent Nutrient Removal Requirements

Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation

UDWQ POTW Nutrient Removal Cost Impact Study: Analysis of Tremonton City Wastewater Treatment Plant

Increasing Denitrification in Sequencing Batch Reactors with Continuous Influent Feed

East Coast P Removal Technology Performance Summary

Advances in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal at Low DO Conditions

2.0 Nutrient Removal Alternatives

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

Masses at Massillon: IFAS for Industrial Loads and Nutrient Removal

Maureen O Shaughnessy. Prince William County Service Authority

Waste Water Treatment Plant Overview and Tour

Future Directions In Wastewater Treatment

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

THE DEMON ANAMMOX PROCESS: RESOURCE SAVINGS THROUGH SIDE STREAM TREATMENT, AND THE STEPS TOWARDS AN ENERGY NEUTRAL WWTP PRESENTED AT: NC AWWA-WEA 97

NEWEA 2015 Annual Conference Session 16

VWEA Lab Practices Conference. Nitrite monitoring with an online analyzer. hunting an elusive quarry for 20 years

Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

Characteristics of Nutrient Removal in Vertical Membrane Bioreactors

Biological Nutrient Removal Operations. December 9 th, 2015 Presenter Georgine Grissop PE, BCEE

A Sustainable Nitrogen Removal Program using Nitrack Automation at Tyson Foods. Mehran Andalib David Redinger Lee Kleckner Kathryn Chadwick

Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

NUTRIENT REMOVAL PROCESSES IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT. We re Glad You re Here!

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

General Information on Nitrogen

At the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection

Chemical and Biological Phosphorus Removal at One of the World s Largest Water Resource Recovery Facilities

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

PLANNING FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL: WHAT STEPS CAN WE BE TAKING NOW?

Energy Savings Through Denitrification

Case Study. Biological Help for the Human Race. Bathurst Municipal Wastewater Treatment Works, New South Wales, Australia.

W O C H H O L Z R E G I O N A L W A T E R R E C L A M A T I O N F A C I L I T Y O V E R V I E W

ADVANCING NOVEL PROCESSES FOR BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL

AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology

WASTEWATER 101 Fo r MOWA

So You ve Removed Your Phosphorus? Now What? JTAC Luncheon April 9 th, 2014

Fundamental and practical studies on Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) Daniel R. Noguera

History of the Plant

Optimizing Nutrient Removal With Instrumentation. John Rutledge Hach RSM-Wastewater in NC & SC

New Developments in BioWin 4.0

MORE EFFICIENT MECHANISMS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL

High Value Resources from High Strength Wastes: Leveraging Food Production Byproducts to Reduce BNR Costs

Tales from the Field: Troubleshooting Denitrification

Transcription:

October 27, 2016 Process Monitoring for Biological and Chemical Nutrient Removal OWEA 2016 PLANT OPERATIONS & LABORATORY WORKSHOP

Agenda Why Consider Nutrient Removal? Nitrogen Monitoring & Removal Phosphorus Monitoring & Removal 2

Why Nutrient Removal? Required by Discharge Permit Improve Water Quality (avoid future limit) Increase Revenue (water quality trading) Stabilize Process Save Energy Recover Nutrients (P) 3

kwh / MG Energy Intensity Benchmarking 2,500 2,000 1,934 1,853 1,955 1,500 1,000 1,412 973 1,249 1,118 1,202 Typical Best Practice 500 4 0 Basic Secondary Nitrification BNR ENR Joint WEF/WERF Webcast: Net Zero Energy Solutions for Water Resource Recovery Facilities Wednesday, October 29th, 2014

P Removal and Recovery Detergent Human Industry Plants WWTP P Recovery Fertilization Mining Weathering Agriculture Runoff Discharge X Phosphate rock Rivers & lakes Tectonic uplift Sedimentation Sediments Cornel et al (2009)

Nitrogen Monitoring 6

Cabinet Analyzer 7

Ion Selective Electrode 8

Specifications IQSN Nutrient ISEs Specification Ammonium Nitrate Potassium Chloride Measuring Range mg /L (as N)* Resolution mg /L (as N)* Response Time min. 0.1 to 100 / 1.0 to 2,000 0.1 to 100 1.0 to 1,000 0.1 to 100 1.0 to 1,000 0.1 to 100 1.0 to 1,000 0.1 / 1.0 0.1 / 1.0 0.1 / 1.0 (as K) 0.1 / 1.0 (as Cl) < 3 9

Response Time 10 Automation of Wastewater Treatment Facilities, 3 rd Edition, WEF MOP-21, WEF Press, Alexandria, VA, 2007.

Optical 11

ISE vs. Optical Nitrate Monitoring - Optical ISE Measuring range, mg/l as N 60 / 150 0 to 1,000 Resolution 0.01 0.1 Pressure resistance, bar 1 0.2 Power Consumption, W Up to 8 0.2 Response time (t 90 ), min. Programmable < 3 Temperature measurement No Yes Additional Parameters / probe COD/BOD/TOC, NO 2, TSS NH 4, K, Cl Warranty (probe), yrs 2 2 Warranty (electrodes), yrs NA 1

Nitrogen Removal 13

The Microbiological Nitrogen Cycle OHO NO 2 - NOB AOB

Nitrogen Removal Configuration 3-4 Q NO 3 -N IMLR or NRCY WW Anoxic NH 3 BOD Oxic NO 3 -N NO 3 -N Clarifier NO 3 NO 3 N 2 NH 3 NO 3 RAS NO 3 -N 15

Delaware County RSD A N O A N O H Anoxic Oxic

Denitrification Process Control Chart 17

4-Stage Bardenpho 3-4 Q NO 3 -N Methanol or Glycerin Anoxic Internal MLSS Recycle Aerobic Anoxic Aerobic Q BOD NH3-N Aerobic 3-5 mg/l TN RAS NO 3 -N Distance

Denitrification Monitoring WSSC Seneca 5 x NitraVis 701 TS (1 in each train) w/ supplemental air cleaning (MIQ/CHV) Goals: Effluent < 4.0 mg N/L (permit) Effluent < 3.0 mg N/L ($300k credit) Minimize Methanol N 19

Step Feed Denitrification NYC DEP 63 x NitraVis 701 IQ Goals: Target Effluent TN = 7 to 8 mg N/L Monitoring of oxic zone nitrate Feed forward Feedback control of carbon addition (NIC-NOT) 20

Phosphorus Monitoring 21

Orthophosphate (PO 4 3- ) Environmental P is Phosphate Soluble P is orthophosphate Colorimetry is the primary method of detection

Phosphorus Characterization TP OP

Orthophosphate Analyzer Low reagent consumption Suitable for outdoors Automatic calibration Integrated permeate pump Filter module 24

Technical Specifications Range (mg P / L) Accuracy Lo: 0.05 to 15 mg P / L 2% or 0.05 Hi: 1 to 50 mg P / L mg P / L Response time (min.) Detection limit (mg P / L) Reagent Replenishment < 5 0.05 mg P / L 2.5 L / 4 mths. 25

Phosphorus Removal 26

How is P Removed? 1. Biological 2. Chemical P Basic concept: P soluble P Particulate

Chemical P Removal Fe/ Al Fe / Al Fe / Al Fe / Al Pre-precipitation Simultaneous precipitation Post precipitation P P

Chemical Dosing Control Manual Flow-proportioned (Feed Forward) Feedback with analyzer 29

Feedback Control Example Fe P700 0.61 0.65 0.05 0.50% 900 HOLD P 0.10

Chemical Dosing System Operation 31

Phosphorus Accumulating Organism (PAO)

A / O Process VFA RAS Concentrations in Bioreactor PAO P Anaerobic Ortho-P PAO P Aerobic 3 x Infl. Ortho-P P-Rich WAS PHB Storage BOD BOD Oxidized Net P Removal Location in Bioreactor

Flow Sheet GC Sugar Creek Effluent Ultraviolet Disinfection

Process Control - ORP

Summary There are many compelling reasons to consider nutrient removal Multiple reliable online monitoring technologies are available for nitrogen monitoring. Nitrogen removal is achieved through modification of the well-known activated sludge process to exploit the microbiological nitrogen cycle Online phosphorus monitoring requires a cabinet analyzer but the technology is improving to reduce maintenance and cost Phosphorus removal can be achieved chemically or through enrichment of phosphate accumulating organisms (PAO) 36

Questions? 37