CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

Similar documents
CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

Environment Environnement Canada Canada. Ministry Of Environment, Lands And Parks. Canada - British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

CANADA-BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

State Of Water Quality Of North Thompson River At North Kamloops

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

EPA Primary. (mg/l as CaCO3) (mg/l as CaCO3)

CANADA-BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

Pebble Project Surface Water Quality Program Streams, Seeps, and Ponds

Newcastle Creek Community Watershed Water Quality Objectives Attainment Report

Ambient Water Quality Objectives For The Similkameen River Okanagan Area

Raw Potable Well Water Analysis: Grid Water Analysis: 2009 & 2016

Water Quality Assessment and Objectives for Windermere Lake

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS REVISED REPORT

Mount Polley Mining Corporation an Imperial Metals company Box 12 Likely, BC V0L 1N0 T F

French Creek Well # 2 Water Analysis Behind 1221 Ormonde Road

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Appendix U. Mapping of Water Quality Concentration Contours across the Province

Appendix C: Water Quality Data

Warm Mineral Springs Sampling by Sarasota County

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MECON LIMITED RANCHI , INDIA

BLACK STURGEON LAKES WATER QUALITY MONITORING

Water Quality Assessment and Recommended Objectives for the Salmon River

Tsulquate River Community Watershed Water Quality Objectives Attainment Report

Ambient Water Quality Objectives For The Tributaries To Okanagan Lake Near Kelowna

Table B1: Analytical Results for Nutrients in Surface Water

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

APPENDIX 15-L SEDIMENT QUALITY MODELLING

Water Quality Assessment and Objectives for the McKelvie Creek Community Watershed OVERVIEW REPORT

Abu Dhabi Trade Effluent Standards & Regulations Summary

Wasa Lake Ground Water Quality Assessment

MECON LIMITED RANCHI , INDIA

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Mercantile Creek Community Watershed Water Quality Objectives Attainment Report

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Annex 7.1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Nepal, 2003

Acidity and Alkalinity:

Drinking Water Supply and

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Ambient Water Quality Objectives For Holland Creek And Stocking Lake Watersheds

Water Quality Assessment And Objectives For The Nechako River

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

BLACK STURGEON LAKES WATER QUALITY MONITORING

TITLE: SABS PROFICIENCY TESTING SCHEME, RSA

1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 APPROACH. DATE 13 April 2012 PROJECT No

Thames River Water Quality 2017

Tolerance and Classification

Bridge-Seton Water Use Plan. Monitoring Program Terms of Reference. BRGMON-12 Bridge-Seton Metals and Contaminant Monitoring Program

Summary of Basin Characteristics and Facilities. General Land-use Characteristics: Withdrawal and Discharge Sites: Sampling Site Statistics:

2. GUIDELINES FOR THE EVALUATION OF DRINKING-WATER QUALITY FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION WITH REGARD TO CHEMICAL, PHYSICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL QUALITY

Water Quality Protection Issues for New Water Supply Wells

University of Nairobi Department of Geology Presentation on, POLLUTION OF GROUNDWATER IN URBAN AREAS OF KENYA; FOCUSING NAIROBI CITY

Lake Huron Water Treatment Plant Mineral Report

Summary of Preliminary Results of EPA Remedial Investigation Molycorp molybdenum mine Questa, New Mexico

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS REVISED REPORT

Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Water Quality Division Laboratory Analysis of Water Samples Collected at Lake Huron Plant 6/9/2015

Lake Huron Water Treatment Plant Mineral Report

Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Water Quality Division Laboratory Analysis of Water Samples Collected at Lake Huron Plant 10/14/2014

Summary Table. Appendix A Summary of Technical Advice Received at TAC Meeting 2 Final (Version: Jan 19, 2014)

Ambient Water Quality Objectives For The Coquitlam-Pitt River Area Tributaries To The Lower Fraser River Along The North Shore

Santa Rosa Creek Water Quality Results 2004

Okanagan Stream Trend Monitoring Program Coldstream Creek Summary Report 2009

Globeville Landing Outfall Surface Water. December 12, 2017 Andrew Ross, Jon Novick Denver Department of Public Health & Environment

Elko Project Water Use Plan. Revised for Acceptance by the Comptroller of Water Rights

West Souris River Technical Water Quality Report Summary

RECOMMENDED SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION (For Testing Laboratories) * Test Method / Standard against which tests are performed

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR GENERAL WTP REQUESTED DATA FOR THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT (WTP) - Application : groundwater (well pit); urban wastewater;

SPECIFICATION NO.1197S Addendum No.4 Attachment D. Appendix L- Ground Water Quality Data and Revised Construction Groundwater Discharge Plan

Attainment of Water Quality Objectives for Lakelse Lake in

um"ts: m1 1grams per rt1er (mg./l)

WOLVERINE MINE MONITORING AND SURVEILLANCE PLAN 2011 ANNUAL REPORT

State of Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Protection Laboratory Scope of Accreditation

REPORT. Report No: 2013/0958 Prepared For: Natural Resources Committee Prepared By: Dean Olsen, Environmental Resource Scientist Date: 11 July 2013

Results from the 2017 Water Quality Monitoring Program

KKB Micro Testing Labs Pvt. Ltd., , 2 nd Floor, Tarun Plaza, NFC Main Road, Krishna Nagar Colony, Moula Ali, Hyderabad, Telangana

5.0 LOS ANGELES RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREA

Durban Height Waterworks, Design capacity: 615 ML/d, Period: 01 July June 2014

State of Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Protection Laboratory Scope of Accreditation

An Evaluation of Recent Allegations of Trace Metal Contamination At the McDermott and Ernest Mine Sites

Village of McBride Annual Water System Report

Certificate of Analysis

Ambient Water Quality Guidelines (Criteria) for Colour

SCHEDULE I LIST I GENERAL STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR THE DISCHARGE OF INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENTS INTO INLAND SURFACE WATERS

Please find information regarding the Leachate reporting requirements for the July 15, 2018

Sugar Creek Watershed Watershed Number:

INORGANIC CHEMICALS IN GROUND WATER AND SOIL: BACKGROUND CONCENTRATIONS AT CALIFORNIA AIR FORCE BASES.

FORTUNE MINERALS LIMITED 140 Fullarton Street, Suite 1902, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5P2 Tel ~ Fax

ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION AND REGULATION IN MALAYSIA

2019 Microbac Laboratories Inc. Ohio Valley Division

Environmental Management System

Drinking Water Quality Monitoring Report Vancouver Police Department Vancouver, British Columbia

Notikewin and Keg Rivers Water Quality Monitoring Program 2017

Transcription:

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF ELK RIVER AT HIGHWAY 93 (1968 2) Water Quality Section Water Protection Branch Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection Aquatic Sciences Section Environmental Conservation Branch Environment Canada Pacific and Yukon Region December, 21 Environment Canada Environnement Canada

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Executive Summary The Elk River watershed is located in the southeast corner of British Columbia, and drains 445 km 2 of the Rocky Mountains to the Kootenay River/Lake Koocanusa about 2 km upstream from the border with the United States. The water quality sampling station on the Elk River is located just upstream from the confluence with the Kootenay River/Lake Koocanusa at Highway 93. This assessment is based on up to 33 years of water quality data during 1968-2. The main human activities in the Elk River watershed are open pit coal mining, forestry, outdoor tourism, and residential and commercial development. The water quality trends identified below have not yet been confirmed by statistical analysis. Conclusions There was an increasing trend in selenium, although the rate of increase slowed during 1995-2. The cause of the increasing trend appears to have been the increased disturbance of selenium-bearing strata during surface coal mining. The increasing trend caused guidelines for aquatic life and wildlife to be exceeded often, but no harmful effects have been detected to date. There was an increasing trend in nitrogen, although the rate of increase slowed during 1995-2. The cause of the increasing trend was the increased use of nitrogen-based explosives during coal mining. The increasing concentrations removed any nitrogen limitation to undesirable algal growth, but algal growth was in any case limited by the availability of phosphorus. There were increasing trends in calcium, chloride, magnesium, hardness and conductivity. The cause of the increasing trends was probably due to increased mineral weathering due to coal mining. The chloride trend might also have been due to the use of salt for highway de-icing. The increasing trend has caused the hardness of the water to exceed the poor (but tolerable) aesthetic guideline for drinking water during the winter. The Elk River is not currently used for drinking water. There was a decreasing trend in dissolved ortho Phosphorus. It is not clear whether the trend is real due to improved municipal sewage and coal mine effluent management, or artificial due to the use of more sensitive laboratory methods and better quality control. The decreasing trend would make the river less susceptible to undesirable algal growth. Fecal coliforms declined between 1975-76 and 2, probably due to improved management of municipal sewage. In 2, the water was suitable for swimming, livestock water, irrigation and drinking water after partial treatment (e.g., filtration) and disinfection. ph did not change over time, but occasionally exceeded the upper aesthetic limit for drinking water. The Elk River is not currently used for drinking water. Suspended sediment, as measured by non-filterable residue and turbidity, did not change over time. Annual peak levels occurred during the spring snowmelt freshet and caused several water quality indicators (aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, colour, copper, iron, lead, manganese, phosphorus and zinc) to exceed water Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement i

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 quality guidelines. These exceedances are of little significance because the substances are bound to suspended sediment, and thus not readily bio-available. Additionally, they would be removed by water treatment (e.g., filtration) needed before using the Elk River as a drinking water source. Recommendations Continue monitoring at this station for the present suite of water quality indicators, because the Elk River discharges into transboundary waters (Koocanusa Lake) and has exhibited trends and levels that are potentially harmful. Initiate monitoring of dissolved aluminum, dissolved or extractable cadmium with a detection limit of at least.5 mg/l, and dissolved or extractable chromium, or preferably hexavalent and trivalent chromium, to establish the levels of these substances relative to water quality guidelines. Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement ii

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 1 Map of Elk River Basin Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement iii

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Authors Pommen, L.W. Water Quality Section, Water Protection Branch, Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection, Victoria, B.C. Contributors McDonald, L.E. Ryan, A. Beatty, J. Swain, L.G. Pollution Prevention, Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection, Cranbrook, B.C. Aquatic Sciences Section, Environmental Conservation Branch, Environment Canada, Vancouver, B.C. Pollution Prevention, Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection, Nelson, B.C. Water Quality Section, Water Protection Branch, Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection, Victoria, B.C. Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement iv

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Table of Contents Executive Summary...i Authors and Contributors...iv Page List of Figures...vi Introduction...1 Water Quality Assessment...3 References...9 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement v

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 List of Figures Page Figure 1 Map of the Elk River Basin...iii Figure 2 Flow at the Elk River at Phillips Bridge, 1968-2...2 Figure 3 Aluminum, Total...1 Figure 4 Arsenic, Total and Extractable...1 Figure 5 Barium, Total...11 Figure 6 Beryllium, Total...11 Figure 7 Cadmium, Total...12 Figure 8 Calcium...12 Figure 9 Carbon, Dissolved Organic...13 Figure 1 Chloride, Dissolved...13 Figure 11 Chromium, Total...14 Figure 12 Cobalt, Total...14 Figure 13 Coliforms, Fecal...15 Figure 14 Colour, True...15 Figure 15 Conductivity, Specific...16 Figure 16 Copper, Total...16 Figure 17 Fluoride...17 Figure 18 Hardness...17 Figure 19 Iron, Total...18 Figure 2 Lead, Total...18 Figure 21 Magnesium...19 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement vi

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Page Figure 22 Manganese, Total...19 Figure 23 Molybdenum, Total...2 Figure 24 Nickel, Total...2 Figure 25 Nitrogen, Nitrate + Nitrite...21 Figure 26 Nitrogen, Total Dissolved...21 Figure 27 ph...22 Figure 28 Phosphorus, Dissolved Ortho...22 Figure 29 Phosphorus, Total...23 Figure 3 Residue, Non-filterable...23 Figure 31 Selenium, Total and Extractable...24 Figure 32 Silver, Total...24 Figure 33 Sodium...25 Figure 34 Strontium, Total...25 Figure 35 Temperature, Water...26 Figure 36 Turbidity...26 Figure 37 Vanadium, Total...27 Figure 38 Zinc, Total...27 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement vii

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 1. Introduction The Elk River at Highway 93 water quality monitoring station is located south of Elko, B.C., just before the river enters Lake Koocanusa (Figure 1). This site, also known as Phillips Canyon, is in the hotter, southern part of the Elk River basin. The drainage area of the river is 445 km 2 and its major tributaries are the Fording River in the north, Michel Creek in the east, and the Wigwam River in the south. There is widespread coal mining in the upper Elk basin. The output of coal from the Elk Valley nearly doubled during the 198's. Forestry and outdoor tourism are other major economic contributors. The primary contaminants discharged in the basin are nitrogen (explosives residuals from mining), non-filterable residues and turbidity, and selenium from mining seleniferous geologic formations. The Elk River is the mostly heavily fished river in the Kootenays. It has some of the largest populations of westslope cutthroat trout, bull trout, and whitefish in the Kootenay Region. The Wigwam River has the largest spawning population of adfluvial bull trout in B.C. (Adfluvial bull trout spend their first 1-2 years in the river, the next 2-4 years in Lake Koocanusa, and then return to the river to spawn.) The Elk basin fishery is thus regionally and provincially significant, and has been given a "high" rating by the regional Fisheries Branch. There is domestic water use from 36 streams and lakes in the basin, with four designated community watersheds and 112 licences. Water licences for the Elk River mainstem include domestic (1), irrigation (3), industrial (6), and power generation (2). Municipal drinking water within the watershed is taken from tributaries of the Elk River (Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks and Environment Canada, 1997). The power generation licences are for B.C. Hydro s Elko Dam above the Wigwam River, which is a barrier to fish movement between the upper Elk River and Koocanusa Lake (McDonald, L.E. 21). Environment Canada monitored flow on the Elk River at Phillips Bridge, about 5 km upstream from Highway 93, during 1924-96. The flow data are stored on the Water Survey of Canada database under station number BC8NK5. Twenty-nine years (1968-96) of flow data are plotted in Figure 2. The Province began collecting water quality data about monthly at Phillips Bridge in 1968 and the data are stored on the Environmental Monitoring System (EMS) under site number 216. Environment Canada began monitoring water quality at Highway 93 in 1984 and since 1986 Canada and B.C have jointly operated the station. Water quality data have been collected every two weeks since 1986 and are stored on the ENVIRODAT database under station number BC8NK3 and on EMS under site number 216. Up to thirty-three years (1968-2) of water quality data were used in this report. The data for the current suite of water quality indicators are plotted in Figures 3 to 38. These are the water quality indicators that were recommended by a previous assessment (Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks and Environment Canada, 1997) and that have been monitored up to the present. There are also many other upstream stations on the Elk River and some of its main tributaries that have been monitored by the Province. Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 1

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 2 Flow at the Elk River at Phillips Bridge, 1924-1996 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 2

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 2. Water Quality Assessment The status and trends of water quality were assessed by plotting the water quality indicators over time and comparing the values to the Province s approved and working water quality guidelines (Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks, 21a & 21b). Any levels or changes of the indicators over time that may have been harmful to sensitive water uses, such as drinking water, aquatic life, wildlife, recreation, irrigation and livestock, are described below in alphabetical order. Water quality indicators were not discussed if they easily met all water quality guidelines and showed no harmful trends. These include: total barium, total beryllium, dissolved organic carbon, total molybdenum, total nickel, sodium, total strontium, and total vanadium. Aluminum, total (Figure 3) was monitored during 1982-2 and had only two values (9.46 and 9.78 mg/l) above the 5 mg/l guideline for wildlife, livestock and irrigation. These peak values occurred during spring freshet in 1996 and 1999, when turbidity levels were very high (24 and 56 NTU). Aluminum is the third most abundant element in the Earth s crust and the large amount of suspended sediment present at these times accounts for the high total aluminum levels. There were no apparent changes over time. Dissolved aluminum should be measured for comparison to the drinking water, aquatic life, and recreation guidelines. Arsenic, total was monitored during 1984-2 and extractable arsenic was monitored during early 1984, and the data have been plotted in Figure 4. There was no apparent change over 1984-2.Only one of 367 values exceeded the.5 mg/l guideline for aquatic life. The maximum total arsenic value of.12 mg/l occurred during spring freshet in 1996, when the turbidity was very high (24 NTU) and accounts for the elevated arsenic. Dissolved arsenic was also monitored during 1998-2 and the values were similar to the total arsenic values. The maximum dissolved arsenic value of.59 mg/l on August 15, 2 appears to be an error, since total arsenic was.1 mg/l and turbidity was low (.92 NTU). Cadmium, total (Figure 7) was monitored during 1982-2, but the data were excluded prior to 1991, owing to high detection limits and contamination from preservative vials in 1986-9. The 1991-2 detection limit was.1 mg/l, which is above the aquatic life guidelines (.3-.6 mg/l). Nevertheless, there were 3 values above the detection limit during 1991-2, all occurring in freshet due to elevated turbidity. The cadmium was probably particulate-bound and thus unlikely to have been bio-available. The maximum value of.3 mg/l was still below the drinking water guideline of.5 mg/l. There were no apparent changes over time. Dissolved or extractable cadmium with a detection limit of at least.5 mg/l should be measured to permit comparison of the data to aquatic life guidelines. Calcium (Figure 8) was monitored during 1968-2. Dissolved, total and extractable calcium data were combined in Figure 5, since there was little difference in paired values. There has been an increasing trend in calcium values over time. Calcium and magnesium Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 3

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 are the two main components of water hardness, and increasing levels make the water less aesthetically desirable for drinking water, as discussed under hardness below. The increasing calcium trend is similar to the increasing magnesium, nitrogen and selenium trends, and was also probably due to increased coal mining in the Elk basin. Mining increases the natural rate of weathering of minerals such as calcium by exposing large amounts of fine rock to weathering processes. Chloride, dissolved (Figure 1) was monitored during 1972-2. There was an increasing trend in chloride levels over this time, but the levels were too far below guidelines to be of environmental significance. Increased weathering due to coal mining and the use of road salt for highway de-icing are the probable sources of the increased chloride. Chromium, total (Figure 11) was monitored during 1982-2, but the data prior to 1991 were excluded due to high detection limits and contamination from preservative vials in 1986-9. During 1991-2, three values (.1-.14 mg/l) exceeded the.9 mg/l aquatic life guideline for trivalent chromium. Two of the peaks occurred during freshet when turbidity was high, and one happened in winter when turbidity was very low. The aquatic life guideline of.1 mg/l for hexavalent chromium was often exceeded, mainly during freshet when turbidity was high. There was no apparent change over time. Measuring dissolved or extractable chromium and preferably measuring the trivalent and hexavalent forms of chromium are needed to evaluate the significance of the elevated total chromium values to aquatic life. Cobalt, total (Figure 12) was monitored during 1991-2 and 18 values exceeded the.9 mg/l aquatic life guideline. These peaks occurred during spring freshet due to elevated turbidity and thus the cobalt was probably not bioavailable. There were no apparent changes over time. Coliforms, fecal (Figure 13) were monitored during 1975-76 and 2. The levels in 2 (maximum of 3/1 ml) were much lower than in 1975-76 (maximum of 28/1 ml), probably due to improved sewage treatment. The 2 levels suggest that the water met the guidelines for swimming, livestock and irrigation (2/1 ml) and raw drinking water that receives partial treatment and disinfection (1-1/1 ml). Colour, true (Figure 14) was monitored during 1972-77 and 1997-2. The aesthetic guideline for drinking water (15 true colour units) was exceeded four times, all during spring freshet. There was no apparent change over time. Conductivity, specific (Figure 15) was monitored during 1968-2. There was an apparent increasing trend over time, although the maximum (416 microsiemans/cm) was well below the lowest guidelines for drinking water and irrigation (7 microsiemans/cm). Conductivity is a measure of the dissolved ions in water and thus the increasing trend is a reflection of the increasing levels of calcium, chloride and magnesium ions due to coal mining and road salting. Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 4

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Copper, total (Figure 16) was monitored during 1977-2, but data prior to 1991 were excluded due to high detection limits and contamination from preservative vials in 1986-9. During 1991-2, seven values exceeded the.4-.6 mg/l average guideline for aquatic life. All of these peaks occurred during spring freshet when turbidity was high, and thus the copper was likely particulate-bound and not bio-available. There was no apparent change over time. Fluoride (Figure 17) was monitored during 1972-2. Two values exceeded the.3 mg/l aquatic life guideline for hardness >5 mg/l, with a maximum of.8 mg/l, which was well below the 1.5 mg/l drinking water guideline. There was no apparent change over time. Hardness (Figure 18) was monitored during 1972-2 and exhibited an increasing trend over time. Increasing trends in calcium and magnesium caused this trend, since they are the main components of water hardness. The environmental significance of this trend is that drinking water becomes less desirable aesthetically as hardness increases. During 1972-88, hardness did not exceed 2 mg/l, which is the poor, but tolerable level. During 1989-2, hardness often exceeded 2 mg/l during winter low flows. The Elk River is not currently used for drinking water. Iron, total (Figure 19) was monitored during 1974-2. Twelve values exceeded the 5 mg/l guideline for irrigation, with a maximum of 21 mg/l. These peak values occurred during spring freshet when turbidity was high. Iron is the fourth most abundant element in the Earth s crust and the large amount of suspended sediment present during freshet accounts for the high total iron levels. The.3 mg/l guideline for drinking water and aquatic life was exceeded on numerous occasions whenever turbidity was elevated due to the particulate-bound iron in the suspended sediment. Particulate-bound iron is unlikely to be bioavailable and would be removed by the water treatment needed to remove turbidity prior to use as drinking water. There was no apparent change over time. Lead, total (Figure 2) was monitored during 1978-2, but the values prior to 1991 were excluded due to high detection limits and contamination from preservative vials during 1986-9. There was no apparent change during 1991-2. Two values exceeded the drinking water guideline of.1 mg/l and three values exceeded the average aquatic life guideline, which varied from.7 to.12 mg/l, depending on water hardness. These maximum values ranged from.137 to.155 mg/l. Two of these values occurred during spring freshet when non-filterable residue and turbidity (24-56 NTU) were high. In these cases, the lead was probably particulate-bound, and would not be bioavailable. The particulate matter would be removed by the treatment needed to remove turbidity from the water prior to its use as drinking water. One of the three values occurred in the spring before freshet when turbidity was low (.92 NTU), suggesting that the lead may have been bio-available, but the frequency of this occurrence (.4 % of values) was too low to be of concern. Magnesium (Figure 21) was monitored during 1968-2. Dissolved, total and extractable magnesium data were combined in Figure 21, since there was little difference Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 5

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 in paired values. There has been an increasing trend in magnesium values over time. Calcium and magnesium are the two main components of water hardness, and increasing levels make the water less aesthetically desirable for drinking water, as discussed under hardness above. The increasing magnesium trend is similar to the increasing calcium, nitrogen and selenium trends, and is also probably due to increased coal mining in the Elk basin. Mining increases the natural rate of weathering of minerals such as magnesium by exposing large amounts of fine rock to weathering processes. Manganese, total (Figure 22) was monitored during 1978-2, but the data prior to 1986 were excluded since many values were produced using methods with high detection limits (i.e.,.1 and.2 mg/l). During 1986-2, 7.6 % of values exceeded the aesthetic guideline for drinking water of.5 mg/l when turbidity was elevated, mainly during spring freshet. The manganese was probably associated with particulate matter and would be removed by the water treatment needed prior to use as drinking water. The maximum of.87 mg/l was below the average aquatic life guideline of 1. mg/l at a hardness of 1 mg/l. There was no apparent change over time. Nitrogen, nitrate + nitrite (Figure 25) was monitored during 1975-2 and nitrogen, total dissolved (Figure 26) was monitored during 1984-2. Both figures show increasing trends, although the upward slope of the trends appears to have flattened since the mid-199 s. The source of the increased nitrogen is from the use of nitrogen-based explosives at the coal mines in the Elk basin. Losses of.2 to 6% of the nitrogen in the explosives used at the coal mines has been documented (Ferguson and Leask, 1988). The nitrogen levels were well below guidelines for drinking water and aquatic life. The increasing trend has resulted in an ample supply of nitrogen for algal growth at all times of the year, but algal growth in the Elk River is limited by the availability of phosphorus, which may have declined over time (see phosphorus, dissolved ortho). ph (Figure 27) was monitored during 1968-2 and ranged from 6.5 to 9.2 ph units. Two values exceeded the aquatic life guideline of 9 units and 46 values exceeded the aesthetic drinking water guideline of 8.5 units. The majority (83%) of the values >8.5 were field measurements. In 35 pairs of field and laboratory ph measurements where at least one of the pair was >8.5, the field value was the highest in 32 pairs. Field values are expected to be higher than laboratory values because of lower temperatures and lower carbon dioxide concentrations during measurement. Because of ph instability due to CO 2 diffusion enroute to the laboratory, field measurement of ph is desirable, but high quality field ph measurements are difficult to obtain due to increased operator error and poor equipment performance (McKean and Huggins, 1989). There were no apparent changes over time. Phosphorus, dissolved ortho (Figure 28) was monitored during 1968-2. There was an apparent downward trend over this time, due in part to the decline in the detection limit from.3 to.1 mg/l in 1996. However, there was still an apparent downward trend from 1968-95. The cause of the trend may have been improved sewage treatment and disposal and improved coal mine effluent control. On the other hand, the trend may have been caused by the use of more sensitive measurement methods and improved Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 6

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 quality control over time. In addition, most of the data was below the limit of quantitation (e.g., 3-2 times the detection limit), and thus must be used with caution (Clark and Whitfield 1994). Phosphorus, total (Figure 29) was monitored during 1971-2. Unlike dissolved ortho Phosphorus, there was no apparent change over time. Total phosphorus levels were much higher than dissolved ortho Phosphorus levels due to the phosphorus associated with suspended sediment. Total phosphorus was highly correlated (R 2 =.96) with nonfilterable residue (a measure of suspended sediment), and peak total phosphorus levels occurred when non-filterable residue was high. Total phosphorus is not a sensitive indicator of trends in bioavailable phosphorus, but it should continue to be monitored to track loadings to Koocanusa Lake. Residue, non-filterable (Figure 3) is also known as suspended solids or sediment, and was monitored during 1982-2. The peak values (e.g., >2 mg/l) all occurred in May or June during the spring snowmelt freshet, when the flows were the highest of the year and had their maximum erosive force and carrying capacity for sediment. There was no apparent change over time. Selenium, total (Figure 31) was monitored during 1984-2. Extractable selenium was monitored for short periods in 1984 and 1994 instead of total selenium, and these data were included in Figure 31 to fill in gaps in the total selenium record. There was an increasing trend in selenium over 1984-2, although the slope of the upward trend has flattened during 1995-2 in comparison to 1986-94. Nevertheless, the maximum value of.33 mg/l was recorded in May 1999. The cause of the increasing trend appears to have been the large-scale exposure of selenium-bearing strata to weathering and erosion during surface coal mining (McDonald and Strosher 1998). Total and dissolved selenium were measured during 1998-2, and the paired data show that most of the total selenium was in the dissolved form. The recently revised aquatic life and wildlife guideline (.2 mg/l) was exceeded by 24% of the values, but the values were well below guidelines for drinking water, livestock and irrigation. Although the aquatic life and wildlife guideline was often exceeded, no toxic effects have been reported. Studies to date indicate that selenium has been bioaccumulating in fish, but have found no reproductive failures, which are symptomatic of selenium toxicosis mining (McDonald and Strosher 1998, Kennedy et al. 2). Further studies on bioaccumulation in food-chain organisms, fish and aquatic birds in various aquatic habitats in the vicinity of the coal mines are underway (McDonald, L.E. 21). Silver, total (Figure 32) was monitored during 1996-2. All 115 values were below the aquatic life guidelines of.15 mg/l average and.3 mg/l maximum (at hardness >1 mg/l), with the exception of one value of.431 mg/l on April 27, 1998. This value is two orders of magnitude above all the other values and may well be an error. Total silver values were not correlated with non-filterable residue or turbidity Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 7

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 values, and thus the modest levels (33 mg/l and 18 NTU) of these indicators on this day do not provide an explanation for the high total silver value. Temperature, water (Figure 35) was monitored during 1968-2. Water temperatures met the guideline for aquatic life (maximum of 19 degrees Celsius), with the exception of eight values (1.5% of values) of 2 to 3 degrees in the summers of 1986, 1987 and 1988. The two highest values of 29 and 3 degrees appear to be outliers, because although air temperatures were high at the time (32 and 4 degrees), the water temperatures 8 to 14 days before and after were in the 15.5 to 21 degree range. This magnitude of temperature change over such short periods of time is unlikely for a river of this size. In addition, the next highest water temperature is only 21 degrees and thus there is a lack of continuity in the range of water temperatures, bolstering the conclusion that the highest values are spurious. Water temperatures exceeded 15 degrees during about one summer in three (5.5% of all values). Fifteen degrees is the aesthetic guideline for drinking water, but the lower limit for swimming. There was no apparent change over time. Turbidity (Figure 36) was monitored during 1968-2 and is an optical measure of the amount of suspended sediment in water. The peak values (e.g., >5 NTU) all occurred during the spring snowmelt freshet in late April to early July. The recreation guideline of 5 NTU was exceeded almost every year during the freshet, and the drinking water guidelines of 1-5 NTU were often exceeded, indicating that water treatment to remove turbidity (e.g., filtration) would be needed before using the river for drinking water. There was no apparent change over time. Zinc, total (Figure 38) was monitored during 1978-2, but the data prior to 1991 were excluded due to high detection limits (e.g.,.5 mg/l) and contamination from preservative vials during 1986-9. No change over time is apparent for 1991-2, when a detection limit of.2 mg/l was used. Five or 2.1% of values (.23-.96 mg/l) exceeded the average aquatic life guidelines, which are hardness-dependent, including two values (.85 and.96 mg/l) that also exceeded the maximum aquatic life guidelines. However, all of these exceedances occurred during spring freshet when turbidity was high (14-56 NTU), suggesting that the zinc was particulate-bound and not bio-available. Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 8

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 References Clark, M.J.R. and P.H. Whitfield. 1994. Conflicting Perspectives About Detection Limits and About Censoring of Environmental Data. Water Resources Bulletin 3(6):163-179. Ferguson, K.D. and S.M. Leask. 1988. The Export of Nutrients From Surface Coal Mines. Regional Program Report 87-12. Environment Canada, West Vancouver, B.C. Kennedy, C.J., L.E. McDonald, R. Loveridge, and M.M. Strosher. 2. The Effect of Bioaccumulated Selenium on Mortalities and Deformities in the Eggs, Larvae and Fry of a Wild Population of Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhyncus clarki lewisi). Arch. Env. Cont. Toxicol. 39: 46-52. McDonald, L.E. 21. Personal communication. Pollution Prevention, Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection, Cranbrook, B.C. McDonald, L.E. and M.M. Strosher. 1998. Selenium Mobilization From Surface Coal Mining in the Elk River Basin, British Columbia: A Survey of Water, Sediment and Biota. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks, Pollution Prevention, Cranbrook, B.C. 56 p. McKean, C.J.P. and B.W. Huggins. 1989. ph Determination and Measurement. Ministry of Environment, Water Management Branch, B.C. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks. 21a. British Columbia Water Quality Guidelines (Criteria). Updated January 17, 21. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks. 21b. A Compendium of Working Water Quality Guidelines for British Columbia. Updated April 24, 21. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks and Environment Canada. 1997. State of Water Quality of Elk River at Highway 93 (Phillips Bridge) 1984-1995. Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks and Environment Canada. 2. Water Quality Trends in Selected British Columbia Waterbodies. Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 9

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 3 Elk River at Highway 93 - Total Aluminum Al Guideline 12 1 8 mg/l Al-T 6 4 2 27-Jul-82 27-Jul-83 27-Jul-84 27-Jul-85 27-Jul-86 27-Jul-87 27-Jul-88 27-Jul-89 27-Jul-9 27-Jul-91 27-Jul-92 27-Jul-93 27-Jul-94 27-Jul-95 27-Jul-96 27-Jul-97 27-Jul-98 27-Jul-99 27-Jul- Figure 4 Elk River at Highway 93 -Total and Dissolved Arsenic As-T (mg/l) As-D (mg/l) Guideline.14.12.1 mg/l As.8.6.4.2 7/7/197 7/7/1972 7/7/1974 7/7/1976 7/7/1978 7/7/198 7/7/1982 7/7/1984 7/7/1986 7/7/1988 7/7/199 7/7/1992 7/7/1994 7/7/1996 7/7/1998 7/7/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 1

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 5 Elk River at Highway 93 - Total Barium.4.35.3.25 mg/l Ba-T.2.15.1.5 12/2/199 12/8/199 12/2/1991 12/8/1991 12/2/1992 12/8/1992 12/2/1993 12/8/1993 12/2/1994 12/8/1994 12/2/1995 12/8/1995 12/2/1996 12/8/1996 12/2/1997 12/8/1997 12/2/1998 12/8/1998 12/2/1999 12/8/1999 12/2/2 12/8/2 Figure 6 Elk River at Highway 93 - Total Beryllium.8.7.6.5 mg/l Be.4.3.2.1 2/1/1994 2/1/1995 2/4/1995 2/7/1995 2/1/1995 2/1/1996 2/4/1996 2/7/1996 2/1/1996 2/1/1997 2/4/1997 2/7/1997 2/1/1997 2/1/1998 2/4/1998 2/7/1998 2/1/1998 2/1/1999 2/4/1999 2/7/1999 2/1/1999 2/1/2 2/4/2 2/7/2 2/1/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 11

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 7 Elk River at Highway 93 - Total Cadmium Series1 Cd Guideline.35.3.25 mg/l Cd-T.2.15.1.5 11/2/1991 11/8/1991 11/2/1992 11/8/1992 11/2/1993 11/8/1993 11/2/1994 11/8/1994 11/2/1995 11/8/1995 11/2/1996 11/8/1996 11/2/1997 11/8/1997 11/2/1998 11/8/1998 11/2/1999 11/8/1999 11/2/2 11/8/2 Figure 8 Elk River at Highway 93 - Calcium 7 6 5 mg/l Ca 4 3 2 1 13/8/1968 13/8/197 13/8/1972 13/8/1974 13/8/1976 13/8/1978 13/8/198 13/8/1982 13/8/1984 13/8/1986 13/8/1988 13/8/199 13/8/1992 13/8/1994 13/8/1996 13/8/1998 13/8/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 12

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 9 Elk River at Highway 93 - Dissolved Organic Carbon 3.5 3 2.5 mg/l C 2 1.5 1.5 23/11/1997 23/1/1998 23/3/1998 23/5/1998 23/7/1998 23/9/1998 23/11/1998 23/1/1999 23/3/1999 23/5/1999 23/7/1999 23/9/1999 23/11/1999 23/1/2 23/3/2 23/5/2 23/7/2 23/9/2 23/11/2 Figure 1 Elk River at Highway 93 - Chloride 12 1 8 mg/l Cl 6 4 2 6/1/1972 6/1/1973 6/1/1974 6/1/1975 6/1/1976 6/1/1977 6/1/1978 6/1/1979 6/1/198 6/1/1981 6/1/1982 6/1/1983 6/1/1984 6/1/1985 6/1/1986 6/1/1987 6/1/1988 6/1/1989 6/1/199 6/1/1991 6/1/1992 6/1/1993 6/1/1994 6/1/1995 6/1/1996 6/1/1997 6/1/1998 6/1/1999 6/1/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 13

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 11 Elk River at Highway 93 - Total Chromium Series1 Cr III Guideline.16.14.12.1 mg/l Cr-T.8.6.4.2 11/2/1991 11/8/1991 11/2/1992 11/8/1992 11/2/1993 11/8/1993 11/2/1994 11/8/1994 11/2/1995 11/8/1995 11/2/1996 11/8/1996 11/2/1997 11/8/1997 11/2/1998 11/8/1998 11/2/1999 11/8/1999 11/2/2 11/8/2 Figure 12 Elk River at Highway 93 - Total Cobalt Series1 Co Guideline.8.7.6.5 mg/l Co.4.3.2.1 12/2/199 12/8/199 12/2/1991 12/8/1991 12/2/1992 12/8/1992 12/2/1993 12/8/1993 12/2/1994 12/8/1994 12/2/1995 12/8/1995 12/2/1996 12/8/1996 12/2/1997 12/8/1997 12/2/1998 12/8/1998 12/2/1999 12/8/1999 12/2/2 12/8/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 14

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 13 Elk River at Highway 93 - Fecal Coliforms 3 25 2 15 1 5 12/8/1975 12/8/1976 12/8/1977 12/8/1978 12/8/1979 12/8/198 12/8/1981 12/8/1982 12/8/1983 12/8/1984 12/8/1985 12/8/1986 12/8/1987 12/8/1988 12/8/1989 12/8/199 12/8/1991 12/8/1992 12/8/1993 12/8/1994 12/8/1995 12/8/1996 12/8/1997 12/8/1998 12/8/1999 12/8/2 CFU or MPN per 1 ml Figure 14 Elk River at Highway 93 - True Colour 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 6/1/1972 6/1/1973 6/1/1974 6/1/1975 6/1/1976 6/1/1977 6/1/1978 6/1/1979 6/1/198 6/1/1981 6/1/1982 6/1/1983 6/1/1984 6/1/1985 6/1/1986 6/1/1987 6/1/1988 6/1/1989 6/1/199 6/1/1991 6/1/1992 6/1/1993 6/1/1994 6/1/1995 6/1/1996 6/1/1997 6/1/1998 6/1/1999 True Colour Units 6/1/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 15

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 15 Elk River at Highway 93 - Conductance, Specific 8 7 6 microsiemens/cm 5 4 3 2 1 13/8/1968 13/8/197 13/8/1972 13/8/1974 13/8/1976 13/8/1978 13/8/198 13/8/1982 13/8/1984 13/8/1986 13/8/1988 13/8/199 13/8/1992 13/8/1994 13/8/1996 13/8/1998 13/8/2 Figure 16 Elk River at Highway 93 - Total Copper.25 Series1 Avg Cu G/L Max Cu G/L.2 mg/l Cu-T.15.1.5 11/2/1991 11/8/1991 11/2/1992 11/8/1992 11/2/1993 11/8/1993 11/2/1994 11/8/1994 11/2/1995 11/8/1995 11/2/1996 11/8/1996 11/2/1997 11/8/1997 11/2/1998 11/8/1998 11/2/1999 11/8/1999 11/2/2 11/8/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 16

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 17 Elk River at Highway 93 - Fluoride Series1 F G/L.9.8.7.6 mg/l F.5.4.3.2.1 6/1/1972 6/1/1973 6/1/1974 6/1/1975 6/1/1976 6/1/1977 6/1/1978 6/1/1979 6/1/198 6/1/1981 6/1/1982 6/1/1983 6/1/1984 6/1/1985 6/1/1986 6/1/1987 6/1/1988 6/1/1989 6/1/199 6/1/1991 6/1/1992 6/1/1993 6/1/1994 6/1/1995 6/1/1996 6/1/1997 6/1/1998 6/1/1999 6/1/2 Figure 18 Elk River at Highway 93 - Hardness 25 2 mg/l CaCO3 15 1 5 6/1/1972 6/1/1973 6/1/1974 6/1/1975 6/1/1976 6/1/1977 6/1/1978 6/1/1979 6/1/198 6/1/1981 6/1/1982 6/1/1983 6/1/1984 6/1/1985 6/1/1986 6/1/1987 6/1/1988 6/1/1989 6/1/199 6/1/1991 6/1/1992 6/1/1993 6/1/1994 6/1/1995 6/1/1996 6/1/1997 6/1/1998 6/1/1999 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 17

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 19 Elk River at Highway 93 - Total Iron Series1 Fe G/L 25 2 mg/l Fe-T 15 1 5 3/1/1974 3/1/1975 3/1/1976 3/1/1977 3/1/1978 3/1/1979 3/1/198 3/1/1981 3/1/1982 3/1/1983 3/1/1984 3/1/1985 3/1/1986 3/1/1987 3/1/1988 3/1/1989 3/1/199 3/1/1991 3/1/1992 3/1/1993 3/1/1994 3/1/1995 3/1/1996 3/1/1997 3/1/1998 3/1/1999 3/1/2 Figure 2 Elk River at Highway 93 - Lead, Total Pb-T mg/l Max G/L Avg G/L.4.35.3.25 mg/l Pb.2.15.1.5 11/2/1991 11/8/1991 11/2/1992 11/8/1992 11/2/1993 11/8/1993 11/2/1994 11/8/1994 11/2/1995 11/8/1995 11/2/1996 11/8/1996 11/2/1997 11/8/1997 11/2/1998 11/8/1998 11/2/1999 11/8/1999 11/2/2 11/8/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 18

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 21 Elk River at Highway 93 - Magnesium 25 2 15 mg/l Mg 1 5 13/8/1968 13/8/197 13/8/1972 13/8/1974 13/8/1976 13/8/1978 13/8/198 13/8/1982 13/8/1984 13/8/1986 13/8/1988 13/8/199 13/8/1992 13/8/1994 13/8/1996 13/8/1998 13/8/2 Figure 22 Elk River at Highway 93 - Manganese, Total Mn-T (mg/l) Max Mn Avg Mn 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 13/8/1986 13/2/1987 13/8/1987 13/2/1988 13/8/1988 13/2/1989 13/8/1989 13/2/199 13/8/199 13/2/1991 13/8/1991 13/2/1992 13/8/1992 13/2/1993 13/8/1993 13/2/1994 13/8/1994 13/2/1995 13/8/1995 13/2/1996 13/8/1996 13/2/1997 13/8/1997 13/2/1998 13/8/1998 13/2/1999 13/8/1999 13/2/2 mg/l Mn 13/8/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 19

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 23 Elk River at Highway 93 - Total Molybdenum.16.14.12.1 mg/l Mo.8.6.4.2 12/2/199 12/8/199 12/2/1991 12/8/1991 12/2/1992 12/8/1992 12/2/1993 12/8/1993 12/2/1994 12/8/1994 12/2/1995 12/8/1995 12/2/1996 12/8/1996 12/2/1997 12/8/1997 12/2/1998 12/8/1998 12/2/1999 12/8/1999 12/2/2 12/8/2 Figure 24 Elk River at Highway 93 - Total Nickel Series1 Ni G/L.12.1.8 mg/l Ni.6.4.2 18/3/1987 18/9/1987 18/3/1988 18/9/1988 18/3/1989 18/9/1989 18/3/199 18/9/199 18/3/1991 18/9/1991 18/3/1992 18/9/1992 18/3/1993 18/9/1993 18/3/1994 18/9/1994 18/3/1995 18/9/1995 18/3/1996 18/9/1996 18/3/1997 18/9/1997 18/3/1998 18/9/1998 18/3/1999 18/9/1999 18/3/2 18/9/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 2

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 25 Elk River at Highway 93 - Nitrate+Nitrite-N NO2+NO3(mg/L) NO3 3.5 3 2.5 mg/l N 2 1.5 1.5 2/5/1975 2/5/1976 2/5/1977 2/5/1978 2/5/1979 2/5/198 2/5/1981 2/5/1982 2/5/1983 2/5/1984 2/5/1985 2/5/1986 2/5/1987 2/5/1988 2/5/1989 2/5/199 2/5/1991 2/5/1992 2/5/1993 2/5/1994 2/5/1995 2/5/1996 2/5/1997 2/5/1998 2/5/1999 2/5/2 Figure 26 Elk River at Highway 93 - Total Dissolved Nitrogen 1.2 1.8 mg/l N.6.4.2 2/5/1975 2/5/1976 2/5/1977 2/5/1978 2/5/1979 2/5/198 2/5/1981 2/5/1982 2/5/1983 2/5/1984 2/5/1985 2/5/1986 2/5/1987 2/5/1988 2/5/1989 2/5/199 2/5/1991 2/5/1992 2/5/1993 2/5/1994 2/5/1995 2/5/1996 2/5/1997 2/5/1998 2/5/1999 2/5/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 21

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 27 Elk River at Highway 93 - ph ph (ph units) ph 1 9 8 7 ph units 6 5 4 3 2 1 13/8/1968 13/8/197 13/8/1972 13/8/1974 13/8/1976 13/8/1978 13/8/198 13/8/1982 13/8/1984 13/8/1986 13/8/1988 13/8/199 13/8/1992 13/8/1994 13/8/1996 13/8/1998 13/8/2 Figure 28 Elk River at Highway 93 - Dissolved Orthophosphorus.35.3.25 mg/l P.2.15.1.5 13/8/1968 13/8/197 13/8/1972 13/8/1974 13/8/1976 13/8/1978 13/8/198 13/8/1982 13/8/1984 13/8/1986 13/8/1988 13/8/199 13/8/1992 13/8/1994 13/8/1996 13/8/1998 13/8/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 22

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 29 Elk River at Highway 93 - Total Phosphorus 1.2 1.8 mg/l P.6.4.2 2/2/1971 2/2/1973 2/2/1975 2/2/1977 2/2/1979 2/2/1981 2/2/1983 2/2/1985 2/2/1987 2/2/1989 2/2/1991 2/2/1993 2/2/1995 2/2/1997 2/2/1999 Figure 3 Elk River at Highway 93 - Non-Filterable Residue 12 1 8 mg/l 6 4 2 25/5/1982 25/5/1983 25/5/1984 25/5/1985 25/5/1986 25/5/1987 25/5/1988 25/5/1989 25/5/199 25/5/1991 25/5/1992 25/5/1993 25/5/1994 25/5/1995 25/5/1996 25/5/1997 25/5/1998 25/5/1999 25/5/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 23

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 31 Elk River at Highway 93 - Selenium, Total and Extractable Se-E mg/l Se-T mg/l Guideline.35.3.25.2.15.1.5 2/5/1984 2/5/1985 2/5/1986 2/5/1987 2/5/1988 2/5/1989 2/5/199 2/5/1991 2/5/1992 2/5/1993 2/5/1994 2/5/1995 2/5/1996 2/5/1997 mg/l Se 2/5/1998 2/5/1999 2/5/2 Figure 32 Elk River at Highway 93 - Total Silver Series1 Ag G/L.5.45.4.35.3.25.2.15.1.5 31/3/1996 31/5/1996 31/7/1996 3/9/1996 3/11/1996 31/1/1997 31/3/1997 31/5/1997 31/7/1997 3/9/1997 3/11/1997 31/1/1998 31/3/1998 31/5/1998 31/7/1998 3/9/1998 3/11/1998 31/1/1999 31/3/1999 31/5/1999 31/7/1999 3/9/1999 3/11/1999 31/1/2 31/3/2 31/5/2 mg/l Ag-T 31/7/2 3/9/2 3/11/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 24

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 33 Elk River at Highway 93 - Sodium 6 5 4 mg/l Na 3 2 1 13/8/1968 13/8/197 13/8/1972 13/8/1974 13/8/1976 13/8/1978 13/8/198 13/8/1982 13/8/1984 13/8/1986 13/8/1988 13/8/199 13/8/1992 13/8/1994 13/8/1996 13/8/1998 13/8/2 Figure 34 Elk River at Highway 93 - Total Strontium.25.2.15 mg/l Sr.1.5 12/2/199 12/8/199 12/2/1991 12/8/1991 12/2/1992 12/8/1992 12/2/1993 12/8/1993 12/2/1994 12/8/1994 12/2/1995 12/8/1995 12/2/1996 12/8/1996 12/2/1997 12/8/1997 12/2/1998 12/8/1998 12/2/1999 12/8/1999 12/2/2 12/8/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 25

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 35 Elk River at Highway 93 - Temperature, Water Series1 Series2 35 3 25 Degrees Celsius 2 15 1 5-5 13/8/1968 13/8/197 13/8/1972 13/8/1974 13/8/1976 13/8/1978 13/8/198 13/8/1982 13/8/1984 13/8/1986 13/8/1988 13/8/199 13/8/1992 13/8/1994 13/8/1996 13/8/1998 13/8/2 Figure 36 Elk River at Highway 93 - Turbidity 6 5 4 NTU 3 2 1 13/8/1968 13/8/197 13/8/1972 13/8/1974 13/8/1976 13/8/1978 13/8/198 13/8/1982 13/8/1984 13/8/1986 13/8/1988 13/8/199 13/8/1992 13/8/1994 13/8/1996 13/8/1998 13/8/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 26

Water Quality Assessment of the Elk River, 1968-2 Figure 37 Elk River at Highway 93 - Total Vanadium.3.25.2 mg/l V.15.1.5 12/2/199 12/8/199 12/2/1991 12/8/1991 12/2/1992 12/8/1992 12/2/1993 12/8/1993 12/2/1994 12/8/1994 12/2/1995 12/8/1995 12/2/1996 12/8/1996 12/2/1997 12/8/1997 12/2/1998 12/8/1998 12/2/1999 12/8/1999 12/2/2 12/8/2 Figure 38 Elk River at Highway 93 - Zinc, Total Series1 G/L 16.12.1.8 mg/l Zn.6.4.2 11/2/1991 11/8/1991 11/2/1992 11/8/1992 11/2/1993 11/8/1993 11/2/1994 11/8/1994 11/2/1995 11/8/1995 11/2/1996 11/8/1996 11/2/1997 11/8/1997 11/2/1998 11/8/1998 11/2/1999 11/8/1999 11/2/2 11/8/2 Canada British Columbia Water Quality Monitoring Agreement 27