Overview of the Principles of Nitrogen Management and Sources on Crop Production. Dave Franzen, Ph.D. NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

Similar documents
Nitrogen Calibration for Corn. Dave Franzen, Ph.D. NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

Preview of Summer 2014 Revision of Corn N Recommendations. Dave Franzen, PhD Extension Soil Specialist North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND

Split Application- North Dakota Perspective. Dave Franzen, PhD Professor Soil Science Extension Soil Specialist, NDSU, Fargo

Advances in Fertilizer Technologies for Improved Nutrient Management

Preview of Summer 2014 Revision of Corn N Recommendations and N Issues

Proceedings of the 4th Annual Nitrogen: Minnesota s Grand Challenge & Compelling Opportunity Conference

Nitrogen Transformation Inhibitors and Controlled Release Urea

How to Squeeze the Most out of Your Fertilizer $ Dave Franzen, PhD Professor Soil Science NDSU Extension Soil Specialist Fargo, ND

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT FOR NO-TILLAGE CORN AND GRAIN SORGHUM PRODUCTION. W.B. Gordon

Reduced Tillage Fertilizer Management. Bill Verbeten NWNY Dairy, Livestock, & Field Crops Team

Products for Improving the Efficiency of N Fertilizers. Greg Binford University of Delaware

OM 2 OM Processes 2 N Processes 3Sinks 4 losses 5 additions

Plant Nutrient Management. Dave Franzen PhD North Dakota State University Extension Soil Specialist

Extenders and Additives

Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers

Plant Nutrient Uptake Timing and Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers N Conference, Havre December 8, 2010

Nitrogen Fertilizer Management

Multi- Nutrient Variable Application. Much like a Ladder. One Step at a Time. In-Season Cues Secondary & Micros N & S P & K.

Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers

The Future of Controlled-Release Fertilizers

Nutrient Management Conference Feb. 7, 2017, St. Cloud, MN Rick Gilbertson Pro Ag Crop Consultants, Inc.

BEST PRACTICES FOR MANAGING NITROGEN IN NO-TILL

HOW CAN WE REDUCE VOLATILIZATION LOSSES? Larry G. Bundy Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin

A comparison of nitrogen fertilizer additives. R. Jay Goos Professor Department of Soil Science North Dakota State University

Effects of Polymer Coated Urea on Corn Yield G.J. Schwab and L.W. Murdock University of Kentucky

FERTILIZER SOURCES Extension Agent Agronomy College September 24, 2014

Boost Corn Production with the Next Generation of Nitrification Inhibition Experience Exchange Panel

Common and Not So Common Fertility Issues in the Region for Soybean and Wheat

Nitrogen management- Efficiency N products and Cover Crop

Frequently Asked Questions

SELECTING THE RIGHT SOURCE OF FERTILIZER N IN MANITOBA

Evaluation of Fertilizer Additives for Enhanced Nitrogen Efficiency in Corn. Final Project Report (2013 and 2014)

DELINEATION OF HIGH RISK FIELD AREAS FOR VARIABLE SOURCE N FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS TO OPTIMIZE CROP N USE EFFICIENCY

Soil Fertility under flooded conditions

Urea Volatilization and Enhanced Efficiency Nitrogen Fertilizers for Small Grains Crop Pest Management School January 6, 2011

Increasing Fertilizer Efficiency. Dr. Dave Franzen NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

NITROGEN EFFICIENCY AND FALL N APPLICATIONS. Larry G. Bundy Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin

Split N Application for Corn and Wheat: Where, When, How and What to Expect

After application, nitrogen sources in the ammonium form (NH 4+ ) rapidly convert to the nitrate form (NO 3. - ) via a process called nitrification.

John A. Hassell Manager, Research and Agronomic Development Agrotain International St. Louis, Missouri

Getting the most out of your N fertilizer $ Prepared for 2013 Montana/Wyoming Barley and Sugarbeet Symposium

DOES IT PAY TO FERTILIZE CORN WITH NITROGEN? 1

Improve Nitrogen Management by Considering the Source

End of Yield-Based Fertilizer Recommendations. Dave Franzen, PhD Professor Soil Science NDSU Extension Soil Specialist Fargo, ND

Enhanced Fertilizer Efficiency - Fertilizer Products - Saskatoon, CANADA

Potential Uses for Agrotain and Polymer Coated Products

Critical Steps for Optimum Soil Fertility

Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Sugarcane with Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers

Nitrogen Fertilizer Use Efficiency and Fertilizer Economics Cabin Fever January 6, 2009

Evaluation of ESN Fertilizer in Southcentral Montana

Cost-Effective N Management Using Reduced Rates of Polymer Coated Urea in Corn

Nitrogen Technology for Improving N Use Efficiency in Leafy Green Vegetable Production

Site-Specific 4R Considerations When Using Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers

Nitrogen For Corn Production

SF723 (Revised) Barley

SLOW RELEASE NITROGEN FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED SPRING WHEAT YIELD AND PROTEIN. B. D. Brown University of Idaho, Parma Research and Extension Center

UTILITY OF POLYMER-COATED UREA AS A FALL-APPLIED N FERTILIZER OPTION FOR CORN AND WHEAT

Minnesota Wheat Research and Promotion Council

Li Xinzhu & Kevin Moran Kingenta International, China. Kingenta s Vision

Central Region Ag Agent Update Choteau, April 4, 2017

Comparative Analysis of Enhanced Nitrogen. Fertilizers on Canola

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT USING REDUCED RATES OF POLYMER COATED UREA IN CORN

Placement and Timing of Fertilizer Application for Greater Efficiency. Dave Franzen, PhD Professor of Soil Science NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

Nitrogen dynamics of standard and enhanced urea in corn

Nutrient Management Considerations in a High Cost. Carrie Laboski Dep. Soil Science, UW-Madison

Soil Nutrient Management: Testing, Sources, and Foliar Application Soils Workshops for Hill, Blaine and Phillips Counties Feb.

Phosphorus: You have choices! Charles Shapiro Soil Scientist Crop Nutrition

Cost-Effective N Management Using Reduced Rates of Polymer Coated Urea in Corn

Corn Responds Positively to Rate & Timing of Environmentally Smart Nitrogen (ESN) & Urea

Nitrogen Management Products. John E. Sawyer Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Department of Agronomy

Nitrogen Rate Recommendation System for Iowa Corn Production

Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota

Nutrient Management in Vegetable Production. Richard Smith University of California Cooperative Extension Monterey County

NITROGEN FERTILIZER MANAGEMENT OF TEMPORARILY FLOODED SOILS TO IMPROVE CORN PRODUCTION AND REDUCE ENVIROMENTAL N LOSS

Determining nutrient needs

Nitrogen Application Timing, Forms, and Additives

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

Fertiliser Use Phil Humphrey

How Nitrification Inhibitors Perform in Kansas*

NITROGEN TIMING AND SOURCES. Larry G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science Univ. of Wisconsin

Fine-tune Nitrogen Management Using 4R Stewardship

The Enigma of Soil Nitrogen George Rehm, University of Minnesota

Sidedress. trogen Uptake. Seasonal Nit. 80% of requirement after V8-10

Corn Nitrogen Rate Calculator Impact of Nitrogen Application Timing on Corn Production

Managing Nitrogen for Yield and Protein in Winter Wheat

Nitrogen Management in Direct Seeding Operations

Corn Tillage and Plant Nutrition Research, NDSU Carrington Research Extension Center

Nutrient Management for Hay Production and Quality

Fertilizer Management

Alternative N Sources for Corn and Cotton in Alabama

The Nitrogen Quiz 01. IPNI Pen

Soil Fertility Update

WITH HIGH FERTILIZER PRICES IS IT BUSINESS AS USUAL OR SHOULD FERTILIZATION PRACTICES CHANGE?

IMPROVING N AND P USE EFFICIENCY WITH POLYMER TECHNOLOGY

ARKANSAS CORN AND GRAIN SORGHUM. Final Report. Optimizing Soil Fertility Requirements for Corn. Leo Espinoza, Soils Specialist, University of Arkansas

Institute of Ag Professionals

Meta-analysis of Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers in Corn Systems in the Midwest

ENHANCED NITROGEN FOR HARD WHEAT YIELD AND PROTEIN Brad Brown University of Idaho, Parma R & E Center

Nitrogen Behaviour Under Dry Soil Conditions Abstract Introduction Moisture Affects Crop Yield and Nitrogen Demand

SIDEDRESSING NITROGEN: USEFUL ON ALL SOILS? Larry G. Bundy 1. Introduction

Transcription:

Overview of the Principles of Nitrogen Management and Sources on Crop Production Dave Franzen, Ph.D. NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

More Nitrogen is used in regional crops than any other nutrient

Microbial transformations of ammonia fertilizers set us up for loss

Ammonia volatility through urease Nitrate loss after nitrification through leaching Nitrous oxide loss after nitrification and denitrification

Nitrogen use efficiency Worldwide about 33% NUE (Raun and Johnson, 1999)

Yield with N Rate Only Soil Test N and Previous Crop Not Considered 100 y = 4E 05x 2 + 0.1252x + 31.232 90 R² = 0.1716 80 70 Yield, bu/acre 60 50 40 Yield 30 20 10 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 N Rate, lb/acre

100 90 Wheat Yield with Available N, 1970-2008 y = -0.0006x 2 + 0.2628x + 19.3 R² = 0.2059 80 70 Wheat yield, bu/a 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Available N, lb/a

The Return to N model- Developed by John Sawyer, Iowa State and Emerson Nafziger, Illinois (2005, Proc. Ext-Ind Soil Fert. Conf.) This model is used in several corn-belt states, including Iowa, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, and Michigan

Langdon Wheat Response to N, $6 Wheat, 30 40 cent N $400.00 $350.00 $300.00 $250.00 Return to N, $/a $200.00 $150.00 6wheat30N 6wheat35N 6wheat40N $100.00 $50.00 $0.00 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Available N, lb/a

$300.00 Eastern ND Wheat Response to N, $6 wheat, 30 40 cent N $250.00 $200.00 Return to N, $/a $150.00 $100.00 6wheat30N 6wheat35N 6wheat40N $50.00 $0.00 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Available N, lb/a

Langdon Region- Low = less than 40 bu/acre Medium = 41-60 bu/acre High = greater than 60 bu/acre Eastern Region- Low= less than 40 bu/acre Medium=41-60 bu/acre High= greater than 60 bu/acre Western Region- Low= less than 30 bu/acre Medium=31-50 bu/acre High=greater than 50 bu/acre

In both eastern and western spring wheat/durum N rate trials, 50 lb/acre less N was required for long-term no-till sites to attain similar yield/protein compared to conventional till plots.

2 1

6 3 4 7 5 8

The final number is not the final number The recommendations state that growers might consider adjustments up to 30 lb N/acre up or down due to- -Varietal protein characteristics -Less than optimal N application methods - Soils with denitrification tendencies - Excessive straw the previous year - Other grower experiences

Spring Wheat N timeline Application Period of greatest uptake Day 1 Day 30 Day 60 Day 90 30 days exposure to losses from leaching/denitrification

Nitrification inhibitors Urease inhibitor additives Nitrification and urease inhibitor Urease inhibition through chemical binding with urea as applied with slow release properties Urease inhibition through physical separation of urea from soil

Nitrification inhibitors N Serve /Instinct nitrapyrin (2 chloro 6 [trichloromethyl] pyridine) DCD, dicyandiamide

Spring N,Touchton et al., 1978 Fall N, Touchton et al., 1978

Some studies showed a yield increase with N Serve, while others showed no yield increase. Yield increases were more a result of weather between application and N uptake rather than performance of the product. Yield increases over the seven years in Minnesota were 15 bushels per acre more for fall anhydrous ammonia + N Serve over fall anhydrous ammonia alone, and 27 bushels per acre more for spring anhydrous ammonia compared to fall anhydrous ammonia (Randall et al., 2008).

Instinct is a new formulation of Nitrapyrin that can be mixed with ammonium fertilizers and can stay on the soil surface without incorporation. Research so far at Minnesota, Illinois, Iowa and Nebraska have shown no yield benefit to the use of Instinct over N fertilizer alone, although the product inhibits nitrification (Kentucky, Schwab, unpublished data)

Wisconsin Corn yield increase with Instinct in 2008, but not 2009.

DCD- a nitrification inhibitor Found in AgrotainPlus (Agrotain, Int.) SuperU (Agrotain, Int.) Guardian DF (Conklin) Guardian DL (Conklin)

NBPT (N (n butyl) thiophosphoric acid triamide) Agrotain Competes for active sites on the urease enzyme and ties up activity for about 10 days, depending on weather conditions.

Yield for side-dressed no-till corn in Hardin County, KY. (From Schwab and Murdock, 2009) Treatment Yield, bushels per acre Check (50 lb N/acre preplant N only) 117d* Urea 158c Urea + Agrotain 201b SuperU 201b UAN 150c UAN + Agrotain 179bc UAN + Agrotain Plus 175bc Ammonium nitrate 239a

Nitrification and urease inhibitors Ammonium thiosulfate Nutrisphere

ATS has nitrification and urease inhibiting properties. It is not as effective generally as nitrapyrin, DCD, or NBPT. ATS is most effective as a nitrification inhibitor at concentrations of 25 ppm S. (0.1% ATS) Under warm conditions (>60 o F), mineralization is complete in a week. Under cooler temperatures, mineralization is slower; about 3 weeks.

Nutrisphere, SFP Specialty Products, LLC, Leawood, KS Formulation for dry fertilizer 30 60% maleic itoconic copolymer, ph 2.5 5 Formulation for liquid fertilizer 40% maleic itoconic copolymer, ph 1 2

Product literature states that nitrification inhibition is based on product ability to tie up copper a critical metal used by nitrification bacteria. Inhibition of urease activity is due theoretically to a tie up of soil nickela critical metal constituent of urease enzyme.

Effects of N additive, averaged over source (UAN and urea) and N rate on corn grain yield, earleaf N and grain N, Scandia, KS (2 year average). From Gordon, 2008. Treatment Yield, bu/acre Earleaf N, % Grain N, % Check 152 1.72 1.13 Urea/UAN 168 2.57 1.26 ESN 185 2.96 1.33 Nutrisphere-N 183 2.96 1.35 Agrotain 183 2.98 1.36 LSD 5% 6 0.09 0.04

(Research by R.J. Goos, in Franzen et al., J. Plant Nut 2011)

(Research by R.J. Goos, in Franzen et al., J. Plant Nut 2011)

Cumulative ammonia volatilization losses for urea, ammonium sulfate, urea + NBPT, and urea + 0.25% Nutrisphere (NSN) from a Dewitt silt loam soil during a 15-day laboratory incubation at 25 C. (Norman data, University Arkansas, Fayetteville, from Franzen et al., 2010?) N sources Days after N source application 3 7 11 15 Cumulative NH 3 loss, % of N applied Urea 14.5 35.9 51.8 56.9 Ammonium sulfate 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.6 Urea + NBPT 0.006 2.7 12.9 18.3 Urea + 0.25% NSN 17.6 42.2 57.8 62.7 LSD(0.05) LSD(0.05) 12.2 9.6

One possible reason for the yield increase is the ph of the product, particularly with the liquid formulation. Acid ph lowers the rate of nitrification. Perhaps it is not the Nutrisphere that is active. Perhaps it is its acidity? Maybe it acts as a chelating agent for micronutrient metals like Zn? No one really knows.

N Zone (AgXplore International, Inc., Parma, MO) Proprietory blend of Ca Aminoethylpiperazine and Ca Heteropolysaccharides Use rate, varies by product and length of benefit required. Generally 1 2 qts/ton. Arkansas has shown no benefit. Initial lab work by Dr. Goos on one ND soil shows it has no nitrification inhibiting ability.

Urease inhibitors through chemical binding with urea and slow-release properties Nitramin (Georgia Pacific/N Demand Wilbur Ellis) 30L = 12% N urea, 18% from Triazone, methylene urea CoRon (Helena)28-0-0 (19.6% methyl-urea, methyl-diurea, urea (8.6%) (There are 20 different CoRon formulations) N-Pact (UAP) 9.6% Methyl-triazole, urea 17.4% Nutralene (Agrium) 40-0-0SGN 225 6% urea N, 20 % methylenediurea and dimethyleneurea, 14% from water insoluble N. Nitroform (38-0-0) (Agrium) 5% urea N, 8% from urea Formaldehyde, 25% water insoluble

2009 Carrington, ave. 2 sites, post anthesis application for protein enhancement. Schatz 15 14.5 14 13.5 Irr Faller Lebsock average 13 untreated check 10 gal UAN 12 gal Coron 2 gal Coron Faller yields over 100 bu/acre Slide courtesy of Greg Endres, NDSU, Carrington REC

Urease inhibition through physical separation of urea from soil These are fertilizers with physical coatings. The most common fertilizer of this type being marketed across the region is ESN by Agrium

Illinois 4 locations over 12 years, ESN was similar in corn yield to urea + Agrotain, and 3 bu/a higher in yield than urea alone. In 4 years of no till, ESN was 21 bu/a better than urea surface applied. (Ebelhar et al., 2010)

Kansas At drier locations, ESN not beneficial to corn or grain sorghum. At wetter locations, some studies showed a benefit to its use. (Weber et al., 2009a and 2009b)

SUMMARY Agrotain is a proven urease inhibitor. Its use is becoming increasingly more common in no till systems that still rely on surface application of urea.

SUMMARY Ammonium thiosulfate is a limited use nitrification and urease inhibitor due to the rate of mineralization of the fertilizer. It may be of some value if used at the correct rate, but other products appear to be more consistent in their activity.

SUMMARY Nutrisphere has no nitrification or urease inhibition properties and should not be used for these purposes. Within the small number of yield increases, most are not related to N uptake by the crop. These yield increases are curious and should be investigated by the company to determine the reason for yield increases.

SUMMARY Positive results have been shown with ESN in several states when weather conditions might result in loss of conventional urea products. Its cost makes it much more competitive as a slow release product compared to the triazole, methyl urea based products.

300 Yield vs Total Known Available N Eastern Conventional Medium Texture Sites Not S Affected y = 0.0006x 2 + 0.4961x + 110.02 R² = 0.3547 250 200 Yield, bu/acre 150 100 50 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Total Known Available N, lb/acre

200 Yield vs Total Known Available N 2011 12, clay sites only y = 1E 05x 2 + 0.3272x + 53.126 R² = 0.4561 180 160 140 Corn Yield, bu/acre 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Total Known Available N, lb/acre

Denitrification is a HUGE issue in high-clay soils. Leaching is a significant issue, but denitrification over-shadows it. Nitrification inhibitors can be very useful in wet springs. Use the ones that work- avoid the ones that don t. Enhance protein using the recipe, not low rates of slow-release products.