S-09: Auburn Station Access Improvements

Similar documents
Light Rail Operations and Maintenance Facilities

South Sounder Capital Improvements Program

S-16: Sounder Rail Extension from Puyallup to Orting

C-11: Madison Street BRT

Sounder Extension to DuPont

Federal Way Transit Center to Tacoma Dome Light Rail

South Sounder Capital Improvements Program

C-01c: Downtown Seattle to Ballard (Market Street vicinity) LRT, primarily elevated/tunnel options

ISSUES & RISKS Potential timing and coordination with a future system planning process Coordination with jurisdictions and partner transit agencies

Future System Planning (ST4)

Lynnwood Link Extension 2013 Draft EIS Comments and Responses. Page 945

Sound Transit Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Policy

Site Criteria Evaluation Matrix

May 24, 2007 Board Meeting. Making Connections Sound Transit 2 The Regional Transit System Plan For Central Puget Sound

Lynnwood Link Extension 2013 Draft EIS Comments and Responses. Page 216

Transit Oriented Development Study

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: PHONE: Recommend to Board. Final Action

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update Issue Paper S.6: Potential Tacoma Link Extension - East. Prepared for: Sound Transit

2004 FEASIBILITY STUDY UPDATE

SOUND TRANSIT RESOLUTION NO. R Adoption of 1999 Regional Express Bus Service Plan BACKGROUND AND COMMENTS

10. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, LEADERSHIP, AND OVERSIGHT GUIDELINES

6.0 Indirect Effects and Cumulative Impacts

Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update/SEIS Agency Scoping Meeting. November 8, 2013

Region of Waterloo Stage 1 Light Rail Transit Project. Definitions, Acronyms, Cited References Article 1 Definitions.

APPENDIX N East King County Subarea High Capacity Transit (HCT) Analysis: Approach to Assessing System-Level Alternatives

Chicago Transit Authority Orange Line Alternatives Analysis Study

Lynnwood Link Extension 2013 Draft EIS Comments and Responses

Green Line COLLEGE AVENUE TO MYSTIC VALLEY PARKWAY. November 20, 2017 Public Information Meeting

Making Connections Sound Transit 2 The Regional Transit System Plan For Central Puget Sound

Alternatives Analysis, New Starts

Chapter 5 Transportation Draft

Updating Sound Transit s Long-Range Plan. ITE November 12, 2013

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES CARRIED FORWARD

SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M Airport Link Civil Construction Contract #2 Funding Commitment

MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: PHONE: Board. Recommendation to. Board. Final Action

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

1.1 Purpose of the Project

APPENDIX A - PLANS AND POLICY REVIEW FEBRUARY 2017

Environmental Scoping Information Report

West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions. Stakeholder Advisory Group March 14, 2018

Regional Transit Asset Management Performance Targets. Transportation Operators Committee March 22, 2017

Transportation and Utilities

Metro Blue Line Improvements & Project Update

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting November 15, 2012

Rail Corridor Feasibility Study

Progress Report Sounder Program

TSM/TDM (Transit and Roadway Efficiency) Concept - Analysis and Results

VRE Gainesville-Haymarket Alternatives Analysis Report

Revenues and expenditures increase based on the tax district increase due to increases in real estate assessments in CY 2016 compared to CY 2015.

Business Advisory Committee. June 17, 2015

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE LYNNWOOD LINK EXTENSION

CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY GREEN BONDS

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #2

Executive Summary October 2017

RESOLUTION NO

Orange County Transit

Progress Report Sounder Program

APPENDIX A: Transportation Planning Rule

Chapter 14 Public Services and Utilities

Fairfax County Countywide Transit Network Study

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Memphis MPO March 30, 2015

Travel Demand Forecasting User Guide

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

VIA Long Range Plan Glossary

Assessment of Current Status, Plans, and Preliminary Alternatives for High Capacity Transportation in the I-5 Corridor

Executive Summary and Staff Recommendation

Evaluation of Alternatives

3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES

VelociRFTA BRT. Roaring Fork Transportation Authority. Webinar: Transit Planning with a Land Use Lens. August 23, 2011

MOTION NO. M Negotiate and Execute a Settlement Agreement with City of Mercer Island

Appendix A Transportation Technical Analysis Methodology

Phoenixville Passenger Rail Demonstration Project

CENTRAL AND EAST CORRIDORS

Columbia Pike Transit Initiative

1560 Broadway, Suite 700, Denver, CO phone

Caltrain Rapid Rail Plan

Lynnwood Link Extension 2013 Draft EIS Comments and Responses. Page 275

October 31, Honorable Patty Murray United States Senate Washington, DC. Dear Senator Murray,

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority

Locally Preferred Alternative. Work In Progress; Subject To Change Without Notice 1

Welcome to the VRE Gainesville-Haymarket Extension (GHX) Study Community Meeting

Chapter 5 - Transportation

Progress Report Sounder Program

Appendix F 2008 Travel Demand Modeling

Item ST Offer- 5/22 Short-term (construction) parking

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

Stockton Freight & Passenger Rail Mobility Enhancement

2017 Sustainability Progress Report Building a better tomorrow JUNE 2018

East Link Extension South Bellevue Completion of Design Open House. November 6, 2014

LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD EXPANSION PROJECT FROM FLORAL PARK TO HICKSVILLE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Mobility 2025 Update: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan

A RESOLUTION of the Board of the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority adopting a revised Sound Transit 2 Regional Transit System Plan.

Alternatives Analysis

Update on ST3 West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions

Issue Paper on Regional Land Use and Transit Planning (Draft)

Category 3, BART Capacity, Access and Parking Improvements. Contra Costa Transportation Authority STAFF REPORT Page 2 of 5 The Authority directed staf

Green Line Extension EOT. Project Location. Project Purpose. Environmental Impact Report Public Scoping Session

Transcription:

Project Number S-09 Subarea South King Primary Mode Commuter Rail Facility Type Infrastructure Improvements Length Version Number ST Board Workshop Date Last Modified 11-25-2015 PROJECT AREA AND REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT SHORT PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project would provide additional parking capacity in a new structure at the Auburn Sounder Station. Alternative access improvements to Auburn Station may include, but are not limited to, pedestrian and bicycle improvements, transit speed and reliability improvements on routes connecting to the station, expanded or new kiss-and-ride areas, and expanded parking capacity. This project is part of the ST2 program; however, due to reduced agency revenues experienced during the recent recession, implementation is deferred. Note: The elements included in this representative project will be refined during future phases of project development and are subject to change. REGIONAL LIGHT RAIL SPINE Does this project help complete the light rail spine? CAPITAL COST Cost in Millions of 2014 $ RIDERSHIP 2040 daily boardings KEY ATTRIBUTES No $41 $44 PROJECT ELEMENTS Multi-level parking structure with 600 new parking stalls to be built on the site of the existing surface park-and-ride lot located west of the Sounder Station. The scope of the transit parking components included in this project could be revised to include a range of strategies for providing rider access to the transit facility. Along with, or instead of parking for private vehicles or van pools, a mix of other investments could be accomplished through the budget for this project. These other strategies include the following: o Pedestrian improvements within one-quarter mile of the Auburn Station o Additional bus/transfer facilities at Auburn Station o Bicycle improvements within one-half mile o Transit speed and reliability improvements on routes connecting to the facility o Expanded or new kiss-and-ride areas at Auburn Station o Off-site parking along an existing bus route that frequently connects (20-minute or shorter headway) to Auburn Station during peak periods Closure and demolition of the existing surface park-and-ride lot located west of the existing station platform Signage, lighting, CCTV cameras, and customer emergency stations Page 1 of 6

KEY ATTRIBUTES PROJECT ELEMENTS One additional ticket vending machine to accommodate additional users Temporary parking spaces for displaced parking 1 percent for art per Sound Transit policy Sustainability measures (see separate document titled Common Project Elements ) NOT INCLUDED Shuttle bus or other connections between the station and temporary/interim parking stalls See separate document titled Common Project Elements ISSUES & RISKS New agreements, or amendments to existing agreements, with the City of Auburn, BNSF, and King County Metro may be required Agreement with BNSF needed to permit construction Zoning waiver from the City of Auburn will be needed Poor soil conditions and hazardous materials remediation may be required Design and scale of the project could be influenced by expansion of parking at other South Sounder stations Page 2 of 6

Sound Transit has developed a conceptual scope of work for this candidate project for the purpose of generating a representative range of costs, both capital and operating; and benefits, including ridership forecasts, TOD potential, multi-modal access and others. This information is being developed to assist the Sound Transit Board as it develops an ST3 system plan, including phasing of investments and financial plan, for voter consideration. Final decisions on project elements (e.g., alignment, profile, number of stations, station locations, and number of parking stalls) will be determined after completion of system planning, project level environmental review, and preliminary engineering during which additional opportunities for public participation will be provided. Therefore, this scope definition should not be construed as a commitment that all representative features will be included in the final developed project. Long Description: Provide additional parking capacity in a new multi-level parking structure at the Auburn Sounder Station with 600 parking stalls to help meet longterm demand. This project will result in a net increase of approximately 500 parking stalls. Alternative access improvements to Auburn Station, may include, but are not limited to, pedestrian and bicycle improvements, transit speed and reliability improvements on routes connecting to the station, expanded or new kiss-and-ride areas, and expanded parking capacity. Assumptions: Temporary parking spaces will be within one-half mile of the proposed structure, likely through lease arrangements Existing Sounder platforms will remain open during the construction period and will be protected during construction The pedestrian bridge connecting the existing parking structure with the station platform will be protected during construction The existing surface park-and-ride lot located west of the existing station platform will be closed and demolished to allow for construction of the new garage Construction phasing to maintain operation of the station, including alternate routing of Metro and ST buses Special traffic control to address a confined site and working near an active railroad Zoning Waiver from the City of Auburn will be needed Environmental: Sound Transit will complete project-level state and federal environmental reviews as necessary; provide mitigation for significant impacts; obtain and meet the conditions of all required permits and approvals; and strive to exceed compliance and continually improve its environmental performance. Utilities: Utility relocation as needed to complete the project, including fiber optics, sewer, water, overhead electric/communications, etc. Right-of-Way and Property Acquisition: Costs associated with obtaining waiver(s) of Auburn zoning requirements related to height of the structure and street-level retail Lease of nearby property during construction for interim parking replacement and possible construction staging and/or storage of materials and equipment Potential Permits/Approvals Needed: Building, electrical, mechanical, utility, land use, and construction-related, BNSF Construction-related permits (clearing and grading, stormwater management, street use, haul routes, use of city right-of-way) Land use approvals (Conditional use, design review, site plans, Comprehensive Plan or development code consistency, Special Use Permits) All required local, state and federal environmental permits NEPA/SEPA and related regulations Project Dependencies: Amendments may be required to the existing three-party station agreement with the City of Auburn, ST, and King County Metro; BNSF to facilitate construction Approval of Zoning Waiver from the City of Auburn Access and demand studies would be required prior to changing this project s scope; determination of what level and mixture of investments would be most effective and affordable within the project's budget would be conducted through a planning effort that includes a more detailed examination of demand and use, as well as coordination with affected jurisdictions and partner agencies, the community surrounding the station/center, and the users of the transit services available at the location; Sound Transit Board action is required to change a project s scope in this manner Page 3 of 6

Potential Project Partners: BNSF City of Auburn King County FTA Transit partners serving project: King County Metro & Pierce Transit Page 4 of 6

Cost: Sound Transit has developed a conceptual scope of work for this candidate project for the purpose of generating a representative range of costs, both capital and operating; and benefits, including ridership forecasts, TOD potential, multi-modal access and others. This information is being developed to assist the Sound Transit Board as it develops an ST3 system plan, including phasing of investments and financial plan, for voter consideration. Final decisions on project elements (e.g., alignment, profile, number of stations, station locations, and number of parking stalls) will be determined after completion of system planning, project level environmental review, and preliminary engineering during which additional opportunities for public participation will be provided. Therefore, this scope definition should not be construed as a commitment that all representative features will be included in the final developed project. In Millions of 2014$ ITEM COST COST WITH RESERVE Agency Administration $2.17 $2.32 Preliminary Engineering & Environmental Review $1.30 $1.39 Final Design & Specifications $2.59 $2.77 Property Acquisition & Permits $3.00 $3.21 Construction $26.43 $28.28 Construction Management $2.33 $2.50 Third Parties $0.52 $0.55 Vehicles $0.00 $0.00 Contingency $2.59 $2.77 Total $40.93 $43.79 Design Basis: Conceptual The costs expressed above include allowances for TOD planning and due diligence, Sustainability, Bus/rail integration facilities, and Non-Motorized Access. These allowances, as well as the costs for Parking Access included above, are reflected in the following table. Property acquisition costs are not included in the table below, but are included within the total project cost above. ITEM COST COST WITH RESERVE TOD planning and due diligence Sustainability $1.82 $1.95 Parking access $30.94 $33.10 Non-motorized (bicycle/pedestrian) access Bus/rail integration facilities Page 5 of 6

Evaluation Measures: MEASURE MEASUREMENT/RATING NOTES Regional Light Rail Spine Does project help complete regional light rail spine? No Ridership 2040 daily station boardings Capital Cost Cost in Millions of 2014 $ Annual O&M Cost Cost in Millions of 2014 $ Travel Time In-vehicle travel time along the project (segment) Reliability Quantitative/qualitative assessment of alignment/route in exclusive right-of-way System Integration Qualitative assessment of issues and effects related to connections to existing local bus service and potential future integration opportunities Ease of Non-motorized Access Qualitative assessment of issues and effects related to non-motorized modes Percent of Non-motorized Mode of Access Percent of daily boardings Connections to PSRC-designated Regional Centers Number of PSRC-designated regional growth and manufacturing/industrial centers served Land Use and Development/TOD Potential Quantitative/qualitative assessment of adopted Plans & Policies and zoning compatible with transit-supportive development within 0.5 mile of potential stations $41 $44 $0.42 1 center Auburn regional growth center served Qualitative assessment of real estate market support for development within 1 mile of potential corridor Density of activity units (population and employment for 2014 and 2040) within 0.5 mile of potential station areas Socioeconomic Benefits Existing minority / low-income populations within 0.5 mile of potential station areas 2014 and 2040 population within 0.5 mile of potential station areas 2014 and 2040 jobs within 0.5 mile of potential station areas For additional information on evaluation measures, see http://soundtransit3.org/document-library Page 6 of 6