BioCarbon Fund - Initiative for Sustainable Forest Landscapes

Similar documents
BioCarbon Fund - Initiative for Sustainable Forest Landscapes. ISFL ER Program Requirements for Program Design Public Consultation Period May 2017

ISFL Methodological Approach for GHG accounting

ISFL Methodological Approach Workshop Summary. December 9-10, the Dupont Circle Hotel, Washington DC, USA

ISFL Emission Reductions (ER) Program Requirements

BioCarbon Fund Initiative for Sustainable Forest Landscapes Terms of Reference Emission Reductions Program Document Assessment

Table of Contents 1. Background Introduction to the BioCF ISFL Workshop summary Concepts and scope for comprehensive

Biomass Maps in the World Bank s Land Use Climate Result-based Finance

FCPF Carbon Fund Methodological Framework. Revised Final, June 22, 2016

ER Monitoring Report (ER-MR)

Questions & Answers. Q1: What is the BioCarbon Fund Initiative for Sustainable Forest Landscapes?

Initiative for Sustainable Forest Landscapes. The BioCarbon Fund Initiative for Sustainable Forest Landscapes Annual Report 2017

STATE, IMPROVEMENTS AND CHALLANGES OF AGRICULTURAL GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY IN HUNGARY

FCPF and BioCarbon Fund Financing in the context of World Bank s Programmatic Approach to Forests

The United Kingdom s International Climate Fund Finance for Forests Case Study

Module 3.3 Guidance on reporting REDD+ performance using IPCC guidelines and guidance

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility

The BioCarbon Fund Initiative for Sustainable Forest Landscapes 2016 ANNUAL REPORT

Understanding Land Use in the UNFCCC. Summary for Policymakers

IPCC Tier - definition

Forest carbon accounting under the Kyoto Protocol and REDD+

THE CARBON FUND OF THE FOREST CARBON PARTNERSHIP FACILITY

Topic A2. Wetlands in the IPCC processes

Forest Reference [Emission] Levels (FRELs) for REDD+ REDD+ Academy, Yogjakarta Indonesia

Main Anthropogenic Sources of Greenhouse Gases Agriculture, Fire, Change in Land Use and Transport

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility

GHG emissions estimation from LULUCF sector

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF): REDD+ MRV

Overview of relevant methodologies in IPCC Guidelines and Good Practice Guidance

Coordination for REDD+ support at the World Bank. Voluntary Meeting of National REDD+ Focal Points Ellysar Baroudy May 13, 2017

5.4.2 Quantitative Approaches to Determining Key Categories

Climate change mitigation activities in coastal ecosystems

INTRODUCTION OF DOCUMENT FOR THE WORKSHOP (NOTE BY SECRETARIAT)

Towards a regulatory framework for climate smart agriculture in Europe

Aspects of Estimating Emissions from Land:

1.0 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Project Activities Legal Status Additionality Timescale... 3

Understanding Land Use in the UNFCCC

An Overview of Cropland Management and Grazing Land Management in the KP Supplement

Outcome of the IPCC expert meeting on National Forest Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Next Steps

REDD+ Academy. National Forest Monitoring Systems (NFMS) for REDD+

PART 1 OF TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT: Summary

LIVESTOCK AND CLIMATE CHANGE

The Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) sector in the EU

The FAOSTAT Emissions database: Available data and major gaps - Francesco Tubiello, FAO

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) Technical Assessment of the Advanced Draft ER-PD-Indonesia

REDD + and Agriculture:

Quantification Options for Agriculture Projects

LIVESTOCK AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Initiative for Climate Action Transparency. Agriculture Guidance and Forest Guidance 16 August 2017

Afforestation and Reforestation under the UNFCCC

TOWARDS A WORK PROGRAMME ON AGRICULTURE

Supporting Materials for preparing GHG Inventories, Biennial Update Reports, and National Communications. Version 2.1, June 2014

AUSTRALIA. Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) Informal Data Submission September 2009

The BioCarbon Fund Initiative for Sustainable Forest Landscapes Annual Report 2018

Session II-2 Discussion on AFOLU

Outlines of Joint Crediting Mechanism Guidelines for Developing Proposed Methodology for REDD-plus

Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD): An Options Assessment Report. Prepared for The Government of Norway

Ethiopia s R-Package: REDD+ Readiness Progress and Multi-Stakeholder Self-Assessment

Monitoring in the Context of REDD+ Readiness Preparation: National Capacities and Challenges

BIENNIAL UPDATE REPORT: INDONESIA EXPERIENCE

Information on LULUCF actions by Sweden. First progress report

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Status on Land Use Change and Forestry Sector in Myanmar

METHODOLOGICAL CHOICE AND IDENTIFICATION OF KEY CATEGORIES

Report of the technical assessment of the proposed forest reference level of Cambodia submitted in 2017

REDD-Forestry and Climate Change Cell

Chapter 7 Measurement, reporting and verification for REDD+ Objectives, capacities and institutions Introduction

AB 32 and Agriculture

Indonesia s Experiences in Developing of Time Series Estimates and Projections (Inluding Evaluation of Impacts of Policies and Measures)

DOCUMENTATION AND CATEGORY BY CATEGORY DESCRIPTION. Training Workshop on the National System for the GHG Inventory

Climate Change and Agriculture in NZ OECD Committee on Agriculture 19 November 2009

CAP CONTEXT INDICATORS

SUBMISSION BY THE REPUBLIC OF MALTA AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES

Report of the technical assessment of the proposed forest reference level of Myanmar submitted in 2018

Module 3 31 July Forest Reference Emission Levels and Forest Reference Levels: Extended Methodological Advice

18/10/2017. Land use and climate. Auditing Land Use and Development 15th EUROSAI WGEA Annual Meeting - Plenary. Olivier Prigent Head of Task

NEW ZEALAND. Submission to the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action. Work Stream 1 October 2014

Gold Standard Afforestation/Reforestation (A/R) GHG Emissions Reduction & Sequestration Methodology

Decision 19/CMP.1 Guidelines for national systems under Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Kyoto Protocol

REDD Early Movers (REM) Rewarding pioneers in forest conservation Financial rewards for successful climate change mitigation!

Measuring Under-delivery Risk

Developing a Voluntary Carbon Offsets Program for Ontario

Uncertainty Analysis in Emission Inventories

Creating a Blue Carbon Asset under the Verified Carbon Standard. Igino Emmer PhD

Lithuania s Initial Report under the Kyoto Protocol. Calculation of Assigned Amount under Article 7, paragraph 4, of the Kyoto Protocol

Peatland in national greenhouse gas inventory - a basis for better peatland management

MRV to support REDD+ implementation in DCR

Pasture Management for Carbon and

Tracking progress to Australia s 2020 target. Julia Gardiner

VCS Jurisdictional and Nested REDD+: Advancements and Opportunities

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) Technical Assessment of the October 12, 2018 version

C a r b o n Po l i c y a n d C a r b o n O f fs e t Tra d i n g S y stems C F G A A G M. November 15, 2017

Results-Based Approach to Mitigation: The GEF Experience with NAMAs

Amsterdam Declarations

Video Conference many things from that, and in fact this was even placed at the BioCarbon Fund 1 of the World Bank, we want to take this experience to

IN NORTH CENTRAL COAST, VIETNAM Overview

Monitoring and Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation Potential in Agriculture: The new GHG Emissions database in FAOSTAT

Session SBI46 (2016)

Thematic event Support for accelerated actions in urban environment and land use to drive mitigation ambition and facilitate sustainable development

First Biennial Update Report. Facilitative Sharing of Views Marrakesh, 2016

Transcription:

BioCarbon Fund - Initiative for Sustainable Forest Landscapes ISFL ER Program Requirements for GHG Reporting and Accounting Public Consultation Period April 2017

ISFL ER PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS DEVELOPMENT The ISFL ER Program Requirements were made public on April 18 th on the ISFL website: http://www.biocarbonfund-isfl.org/methodology Next steps: Webinar on Program Design Requirements on Wednesday, May 3 rd (9:00 11:00am EST) The ISFL will be accepting comments through May 18 th ; send comments to Katie O Gara (kogara@worldbank.org). The ISFL will review comments and incorporate feedback The ISFL and its Contributors will finalize the first version of the ISFL ER Program Requirements and make them public on the ISFL website. 2

CONTENTS 1. ISFL OVERVIEW 2. ISFL ER PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 3. GHG REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS 3

ISFL OVERVIEW The ISFL aims to promote and reward reduced greenhouse gas emission and increased sequestration through better land management, including REDD+, climate smart agriculture, and smarter land use planning and policies. Total Fund Capital: $342 million BioCFplus: Technical Assistance, Capacity Building, Implementation $98M BioCF T3: Result-based payments $244M Contributors: Germany, Norway, United Kingdom, United States 4

ISFL EMISSION REDUCTIONS (ER) PROGRAMS Colombia Zambia Ethiopia Indonesia Selection process Jurisdictional program agreed and funding initiated Target jurisdiction under consideration 5

THE ISFL APPROACH The ISFL will achieve its objective of reducing GHG emissions, while also addressing poverty and unsustainable land use, through four key design elements. 6

CONTENTS 1. ISFL OVERVIEW 2. ISFL ER PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 3. GHG REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS 7

ISFL ER PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS OVERVIEW A document outlining the requirements that ISFL emission reductions (ER) Programs must comply with in order to be eligible to receive resultsbased finance from BioCF T3. It covers the following elements: World Bank Group Requirements Program Design Requirements GHG Reporting and Accounting Requirements Documents and Assessment Process 8

ISFL ER PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS DEVELOPMENT ISFL ER Program Requirements 9

ISFL ER PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS DEVELOPMENT To date, the ISFL has worked actively with the below groups to develop the ISFL ER Program Requirements. CSOs Indigenous Peoples ISFL ER Program Countries ISFL Contributors Academia Other relevant stakeholders GHG reporting and accounting experts Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) Through this webinar series and the public comment period, the ISFL looks forward to engaging the above groups in the review of the ISFL ER Program Requirements. 10

CONTENTS 1. ISFL OVERVIEW 2. ISFL ER PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 3. GHG REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS 11

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE ACCOUNTING The ISFL is committed to working with countries to build capacity and data quality in order to be able to account for multiple AFOLU sectors, including financial support and time to reach requirements. 12

Financial Support to Meet Requirements PHASED APPROACH FOR COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE ACCOUNTING Example ISFL ER Program Country X ISFL ER Program host country budget ISFL grant for MRV support for gaps for additional subcategories ISFL results based payments for emission reductions ERPA Signature End of Phase I End of Phase II End of ERPA ERPA Term 13

ISFL ER PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR GHG REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING ISFL Reporting Quality requirements for ISFL Accounting Scope and baseline setting for ISFL Accounting Monitoring and calculation of emission reductions for ISFL Accounting Uncertainty and uncertainty set-aside factor for ISFL Accounting Reversals Does not contain detailed calculation methods or protocols, but instead are a standard for consistency across ISFL ER Programs. Builds on the IPCC Guidelines for National GHG Inventories and other relevant UNFCCC documents and decisions. Do not preempt ongoing or future discussions under the UNFCCC, including implementation of the Paris Agreement. 14

ISFL REPORTING ISFL ER Programs will perform a GHG inventory of all AFOLU categories, subcategories, gases, and pools in the Program Area, using the most recent IPCC guidance and guidelines and based on best available methods and data. GHG inventory builds on the national GHG inventory and other national processes Comparable in its use of definitions, categories and subcategories Image: Two Rivers Tax 15

ISFL REPORTING HOW TERMS ARE USED IN REQUIREMENTS Categories Livestock A. Enteric fermentation Cattle Subcategories Sheep Swine Other livestock Other C. Rice cultivation Irrigated Rain-fed Deep water Other LULUCF A. Forest Land Forest Land remaining forest land Land converted to forest land B. Cropland Cropland remaining cropland Land converted to cropland 16

OTHER ISFL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Inventory during program design and every second year during the term of ERPA In case of improvements re-calculate entire time series Reported at the level of subcategories 17

QUESTIONS 18

ISFL REPORTING AND ISFL ACCOUNTING ISFL Reporting ISFL Accounting 19

ISFL REPORTING AND ISFL ACCOUNTING ISFL Reporting ISFL Accounting ISFL ER Program Requirements sets the accounting rules and other requirements that emission reductions need to comply with to be purchased by the ISFL. 20

ISFL ACCOUNTING DETERMINING ACCOUNTING SCOPE Analyze Inventory List subcategories in order of the contribution to the absolute level of the total GHG emissions and removals Initial selection Initial selection of required and voluntary subcategories 21

ISFL ACCOUNTING INITIAL SELECTION Example ISFL ER Program Country X Forests to croplands Forests to grasslands Forests remaining forests Grasslands to croplands Enteric fermentation Wetlands remaining wetlands i. i. iv. * iii. ii. All ISFL ER Programs shall initially select the following subcategories: i. Any subcategories involving conversions from or to forest land; ii. Forest land remaining forest land; iii. Any subcategories involving conversions between land-use categories other than forest land that cumulatively with the conversions from or to forest land, amount to 90% of the absolute level of the total GHG emissions and removals associated with all land use conversions in the Program GHG Inventory; and iv. The single most significant of the remaining subcategories. *Additional non-forest related subcategories may be included at the discretion of the ISFL ER Program, if quality requirements are met. 22

ISFL ACCOUNTING DETERMINING ACCOUNTING SCOPE Analyze Inventory List subcategories in order of the contribution to the absolute level of the total GHG emissions and removals Initial selection Initial selection of required and voluntary subcategories Check initial selection Quality requirements Baseline setting requirements 23

ISFL ACCOUNTING QUALITY REQUIREMENTS ISFL Accounting Scope Initial selection is checked against: 1. Quality requirements Use at minimum IPCC Tier 2 methods and data (all significant pools and gases for a subcategory) exception for forest-remaining-forest For land use change-related subcategories, Approach 3 should be used for land representation. Approach 2 may be used if this is not possible. 24

ISFL ACCOUNTING BASELINE REQUIREMENTS ISFL Accounting Scope Initial selection is checked against: 2. Baseline requirements Expressed as tonnes of CO2e per year Based on the average annual historical GHG emissions and removals over a baseline period of approximately 10- year exception for most significant non-forest category End date is the most recent date prior to two years before the submission of baseline for independent technical assessment 25

REQUIREMENTS FOR DETERMINING SCOPE Subcategory Emissions Baseline setting Methods and data Spatial information Any subcategories involving conversions from or to forest land Forest Land remaining Forest Land Any subcategories involving conversions between land-use categories other than forest land Most significant of the remaining non-forest subcategories Additional non-forest related subcategories Historical Baseline Period of 10 years Historical Baseline Period of 10 years Historical Baseline Period of 10 years Historical Baseline Period of 10 years as default. Where not possible and convincing justification is provided, at least 5 years Historical Baseline Period of 10 years Tier 2 methods and data for setting the Emissions Baseline Tier 2 methods and data for setting the Emissions Baseline, using jurisdictionspecific proxies as necessary Tier 2 methods and data for setting the Emissions Baseline Tier 2 methods and data for setting the Emissions Baseline Tier 2 methods and data for setting the Emissions Baseline Approach 2 or 3 for setting the Emissions Baseline Approach 2 or 3 for setting the Emissions Baseline Approach 2 or 3 for setting the Emissions Baseline 26

ISFL ACCOUNTING DETERMINING ACCOUNTING SCOPE Analyze Inventory List subcategories in order of the contribution to the absolute level of the total GHG emissions and removals Initial selection Initial selection of required and voluntary subcategories Check initial selection Quality requirements Baseline setting requirements Final scope Determine final scope and take action on subcategories that don t meet the requirements 27

FINAL ISFL ACCOUNTING SCOPE FOR ERPA PHASE Outcome of the quality and baseline check is a subset of the initial selection which is considered as the final Accounting scope. Example ISFL ER Program Country X Forests to croplands Forests to grasslands Forests remaining forests Grasslands to croplands Enteric fermentation Wetlands remaining wetlands 28

FINAL ISFL ACCOUNTING SCOPE FOR ERPA PHASE Example ISFL ER Program Country X ISFL ER Programs will begin to collect data with the aim of including additional subcategories in the Accounting scope for subsequent ERPA Phase(s). Forests to croplands Forests to grasslands Forests remaining forests Grasslands to croplands Enteric fermentation Wetlands remaining wetlands 29

ISFL ACCOUNTING FOR SUBSEQUENT ERPA PHASE(S) Insufficient historic data available to create 10 year historic average Monitor the emissions for that subcategory in accordance with the quality requirements during the ERPA Phase. These monitored data collected during the ERPA Phase(s) shall be used to estimate the Emissions Baseline during the subsequent ERPA Phase. 10 year historic data available, but does not meet quality requirements A subcategory can only be included for Accounting in the ERPA Phase if the quality requirements are met through improved methods and data. Quality requirements can be met at the latest by the end of the ERPA Phase. An interim Emissions Baseline will be required at the beginning of the ERPA Phase using best available data. 30

ISFL ACCOUNTING DETERMINING ACCOUNTING SCOPE Analyze Inventory For each ERPA Phase the process will be repeated and the Emissions Baseline will be updated Initial selection Check initial selection Final scope 31

QUESTIONS 32

ISFL ACCOUNTING - MONITORING Measure all the subcategories and their associated carbon pools and gases included in the Accounting scope, following quality requirements Ensure methodological consistency between the Emissions Baseline and the monitored net GHG emissions Image: Two Rivers Tax 33

ISFL ACCOUNTING - UNCERTAINTY Identify and assess Systematically identify and assess sources of uncertainty in the determination of the Emissions Baseline and the monitoring of emissions and removals Manage and reduce To the extent feasible, manage and reduce uncertainty of activity data and emission factors used in determination of the Emissions Baseline and the monitoring of emissions and removals Quantify Quantify the uncertainty of the emission reductions using a Monte Carlo method 34

ISFL ACCOUNTING - UNCERTAINTY Programs shall set aside a portion of emission reductions in a buffer reserve to reflect the level of uncertainty associated with the estimation of emission reductions during the ERPA Phase Aggregate uncertainty of emission reductions Uncertainty set-aside factor 15% 0% > 15% and 30% 4% > 30 and 60% 8% > 60 and 100% 12% > 100% 15% 35

ISFL ACCOUNTING - REVERSALS Assess Assess the anthropogenic and natural risk of Reversals that might affect emission reductions during and after the ERPA Term (inclusive of all Phases) Setaside Set aside a portion of emission reductions in a buffer reserve The portion to be set aside shall be determined using an ISFL approved risk assessment and buffer tool Monitor Monitor and report major emissions that could lead to Reversals of emission reductions 36

QUESTIONS 37

FURTHER INFORMATION Dan Radack dradack@worldbank.org Katie O Gara kogara@worldbank.org Marco van der Linden mvanderlinden@worldbank.org http://www.biocarbonfund-isfl.org/ 38