Presented at the SafeSpur Forum 18 November 2009, Chorley

Similar documents
WM 00 Conference, February 27 - March 2, 2000, Tucson, AZ HEXACHLOROBENZENE DESTRUCTION WITH THE GEOMELT PROCESS

WM2015 Conference, March 15 19, 2015, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

WM 2010 Conference, March 7-11, 2010, Phoenix, AZ

A Review of Environmental Impacts and Environmental Applications of Shredded Scrap Tires

In the early 1990s, KHNP considered vitrification technology as a prospective candidate for the

WM 00 Conference, February 27 - March 2, 2000, Tucson, AZ

CETC CANMET Energy Technology Centre Hazardous Waste Combustion in a CFBC

Hazardous Waste Section. Hazardous Waste Determinations

City of Las Cruces, New Mexico INDUSTRIAL WASTE QUESTIONNAIRE AND PERMIT APPLICATION

Treatment of Spent Nuclear Fuel with Molten Salts

Use of In-Pile Thermal Desorption to Treat Persistent Organic Pollutants in Dredged Sediment

Experiences in using alternative fuels in Europe and Germany

WESTINGHOUSE PLASMA GASIFICATION. Hazardous Waste Management

Midwest Analytical Services, Inc. "Where industry comes for answers." PRICE LIST 2009

The following assumptions apply for the immobilization alternatives:

85M102006D. The Shaw Group Inc.

Vitrification of Simulated LILW Using Induction Cold Crucible Melter Technology

WM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Code of Federal Regulations

Hazardous waste from non-specific sources.

Feasibility Study on the Utilization Of Municipal Waste Fly Ash For The Manufacture Of Geopolymer Binder

Organic Waste Treatment by Incineration and Coupled Incineration/Vitrification Processes 14059

SOLIDIFICATION/STABILIZATION CEMENT ADDITIVE and TEST METHOD

EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook

WM 00 Conference, February 27 - March 2, 2000, Tucson, AZ FINAL RESULTS FROM THE IN SITU VITRIFICATION TREATMENT AT MARALINGA

Inventory of radioactive waste, disused and orphan sources and materials and sources in use

NanoFe. Supported Zero-Valent Nanoiron. An Innovative Remediation Technology for Soils and Groundwater. PARS Environmental Inc.

Ferromolybdenum slag as valuable resource material for the production of concrete blocks. Boehme L., Van Den Hende D.

Vitrification Technology for Treating Low-Level Waste from Nuclear Facilities

Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities. Waste Management

Filtration & Pretreatment Basics

Alter NRG Plasma Gasification: Environmental Performance

LOGO. Environmental Remediation Technologies Assistant Prof. Tunlawit Satapanajaru,, Ph.D.

Not Reviewed by WMSymposia, Inc.

BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOLID WASTE WASTE CLASSIFICATION REQUEST FORM AND INSTRUCTIONS

WM2011 Conference, February 27 - March 3, 2011, Phoenix, AZ. Performance Assessment Inventory Considerations at Savannah River Site

Innovations in Stabilization Treatment of Dredged Material Placement Areas

ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF THE USE OF FLY ASHES AS BINDER MATERIALS FOR STABILISATION OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS

WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

WHY RAMSORB SPILL KITS?

Engineering Materials

WHY RAMSORB? PERFECT FOR: The Industrial Strength Absorbent That Makes Environmental Problems Disappear

Chapter 24 Solid and Hazardous Wastes

End disposal of petroleum industry NORM in Norway - Stangeneset NORM Disposal Site

Chemical and Biological Hazards

Variation notice with introductory note

Hazardous Waste Management

Name of Process: Vendor: Applicable Pesticides and related POPs wastes: Technology description:

Remediation Design: Use of Bench Scale Testing. Kevin French Vertex Environmental Inc. SMART Remediation Vancouver, ON March 2, 2017

Treatability of Organic and Radioactive Emerging Contaminants in Stormwater Runoff

23 Solid and Hazardous Waste

The following table summarizes the average test results for the three tests conducted by ORTECH and the corresponding emission criteria:

Fertilizer Contaminants Environmental Affairs Committee AAPFCO Winter Meeting February 20, 2018

APPENDIX B SOURCE TEST METHODS

BIND-AMOR: Flash-calcined dredging sediments of the AMORAS mechanical dewatering plant al cement substitute

Application of New Leaching Protocols for Assessing Beneficial Use of Solid Wastes in Florida. Technical Awareness Group Meeting June 30 th, 2015

. Please fill in Annex1 for waste info

DISPOSAL OF NONROUTINE HIGH LEVEL WASTE IN DWPF CANISTERS AT SAVANNAH RIVER SITE A PRECEDENT THROUGHOUT THE DWPF COMPLEX

For a Cleaner Future. Founded: 2008 Today: 200 know-how experts and growing. Irvine HDQR. Tokyo, Japan. Sellafield, UK

Environmental Issues. GMIC Workshop Columbus, OH Ot20 Oct. 20, C. Philip Ross GICI.

Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Report Review Group 2 NASA Area I and Northern Portion of NASA Area II

IAEA-TECDOC-8S5. Clearance levels

E30. Contaminated land

Creamer Environmental. Containment, Caps & Liners. 12 Old Bridge Road C ed ar Grov e, N e w Jer s e y

Understanding Wasteforms from Thermal Treatment Methods. Bill Lee FREng, Centre for Nuclear Engineering and Department of Materials

Supercritical Fluids

50 lbs (23 kg) of + #8 (+2.36 mm) material plus 50 lbs (23 kg) of pile run material.

Mass Stabilization Virgin & Contaminated Soil / Sediment

Novel Processes for the Treatment of ILW. 02 February

Environmental Performance Test of Hazardous Waste Incinerator in Indonesia

Mobile processing systems for radioactive waste and disused sealed radioactive sources. Peter Ivanov

Cornerstone of Hazardous Waste Management

Plasma furnaces and reactors for waste treatment

Table (continued)

National Standards of the People s Republic of China

EUROPEAN STEEL SCRAP SPECIFICATION. General Conditions applicable to all grades

Treatment of Plastic Waste by Melt Densification- Operational Experience at CWMF

Glass Formulations for Immobilizing Hanford Low-Activity Wastes

INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF LARGE COMPONENTS FROM NUCLEAR D&D PROJECTS

An Evaluation of Cathode Ray Tube Leaded Glass as a Feedstock for Vitrifying Radioactive Waste

Groundwater remediation with the use of PRB Technology. PRB TECHNOLOGY haw does it work and when to use it

NSPI Oil Release Report (as per Environmental Emergency Regulations)

Comparative Analysis of Technologies for Treatment of Solid Radioactive Waste of Nuclear Power Plants

A Liquidation Strategy of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant: A new In-Situ Entombment Plan proposed

Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer s Copyright Authority No dated 02 February 1998

Decommissioning, Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel Management in Slovakia

SWANA 2017 Leachate Basics and Quality Changes with Organics Removal. Steve Johnson M.Eng., P.Eng.

Implementation and R&D Needs for Storage and Geological Disposal of the UK s s Intermediate and High Level Radioactive Wastes.

Hanford Low Activity Waste Historical Overview. David Swanberg February 2018

Response to: Request for Information (RFI) No. OB-VAL HSAAP Thermal-Non Thermal Open Burning Grounds Study

23 Solid and Hazardous Waste

Municipal Solid Waste

Waterfront Substation

Assessing the environmental impacts of landfill mining activities

Module 2: Hazardous Waste Determination

Non-Aqueous Processes

PROGRAMME OF WORK : STANDARDS

SITE Technology Capsule

DEPLOYMENT OF MULTIPLE TECHNOLOGIES FOR REMEDIATION OF NUMEROUS MIXED WASTE STREAMS

The world s leading sustainability consultancy

Transcription:

Presented at the SafeSpur Forum 18 November 2009, Chorley

IMPACT Services, a radioactive waste management company with 4 locations and 2 licensed processing facilities in the US, acquired GeoMeltfrom AMEC in March, 2009 IMPACT will use the GeoMelttechnology for fixed-based processing of toxic, hazardous, and radioactive wastes generated by both commercial and government clients In the UK, IMPACT has teamed with AMEC to continue proof of process demonstrations at AMEC s Birchwood Facility

Electric melting of contaminated soils and wastes Soil normally provides source of glass formers In-situ or In-Container Vitrification Melt temperatures 1300-2000 deg. C Volume reduction typically 25% to 50%, more for other wastes Off-gases captured and treated Majority of organics destroyed by melt with balance removed by off-gas treatment system (OGTS) Heavy metals and radionuclidesretained in melt and immobilized in glass product or removed in OGTS Batch processes with rates to 100 MT / day

In-Container Vitrification (ICV) Subsurface Planar Vitrification (SPV) In-container treatment In-situ treatment

Applicable to most all contaminant types and mixtures - heavy metals -radionuclides - inorganic compounds -organics Successfully treated organic waste loadings >30 wt% Treated wide range of soil types (sands, silts, clays, gravels) Applicable to wet soils, sludges, sediments, ash (up to 70% water) Treat liquid wastes by first mixing with soil High tolerance for debris (steel, wood, concrete, tires, etc) Effective on asbestos wastes (asbestos provides glass formers) Permitted for PCBs by the U.S. EPA Selected in Australia as an alternative to incineration

Metals Pb Cd Cr Ni Ba Zn Hg Cu Al Fe Nd Rb Be As Organics PCBs Dioxins / Furans TCE / PCE Carbon Tetrachloride Benzene / Toluene Acetone Formaldehyde Methylene Chloride Ethylene Glycol Methyl Ethyl Ketone Pentachlorophenol HCB DDT, DDD, DDE Lindane Debris Radionuclides Wood Tires Asphalt Plastic Concrete Steel Plates Drums Rocks Bricks / Clay Pipe Glass Bottles Ash Asbestos Tanks Filters Pu U Cs Sr Co Ru Am Ra Rd Tc

Material Configuration Loading Plutonium Soil / Debris 80 to 175 GBq/ melt PCBs Soil / Debris 17,863 mg/kg Dioxin Soil / Debris 38 mg/kg Pentachlorophenol Soil / Debris 6,950 mg/kg Pesticides Soil >4 wt% Hexachlorobenzene Soil / Debris 33 wt% Lindane Soil 33 wt% Concrete Soil / Debris 8 wt% at FS Asphalt Soil / Debris 75 wt% at ES Iron/Steel Soil / Debris 11 wt% Drums 55-gal 37 wt% Asbestos Fiber Mat 20 / melt setting Water Sludge 72 wt% 70%

Common misconception that GeoMelt requires lots of power Energy requirement for GeoMelt is about half of what other thermal processes require due to greater efficiency and less heat loss -Joule heating (resistive heating) within the body of the melt -Heat losses occur at the melt boundaries and serve to preheat adjacent waste materials -In ICV configuration, sides and bottom are insulated so most heat loss occurs at the top surface where waste material feed pile resides Energy for melting ranges from 0.6 to 1.5 kwh / kg of material melted Energy requirements for off-gas treatment and other services will be about equal for all treatment technologies

Bag House Filter Off-Gas From Melt Particulate Pre-Filters Blower Enclosed Inside Trailer

IMPACT IMPACT

Crusher for Concrete & Debris Pre-treatment Mixer Melt Container at Fill Station Rail Mounted Box at Melt Station Off-Gas Treatment Equipment Liquid Effluent Treatment

Comparative Corrosion Rates (Normally 10X to 100X more durable and leach resistant than HLW glasses) Bottle Glass Marble Granite GeoMelt Pyrex 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 SoxhletCorrosion Rate (g/cm 2 d x 10 5 ) 99 C in Deionized Water

Characteristic Leach Resistance (ANSI 16.1) Durability (years) Waste Loading Compressive Strength (psi) Tensile Strength (psi) Volume Reduction Glass LI of 14-18 >10 4 10 6 Generally higher 40,000-60,000 4,000-4,400 Decrease Cement LI of 6-8 10 2 Limited 3,000-8,000 400-600 Increase

Melt surface during the treatment of plutonium-contaminated waste

Numerical Model Output of Tempest Model Showing Flow Velocities

Soil Steel plate Lead sheet Barytes bricks Electrical Cable Bitumen Plastic PPE Pu and U located in center of treatment zone as point source

Point Sources of Pu and U were incorporated as oxides uniformly in the vitrified product proving good convective mixing to form a homogeneous glass

Robust - accommodates highly variable materials Flexible - process and waste package are project specific Minimal pre-treatment - size reduction and sorting Soil based - an inexpensive source of glass formers Shielding - ICV package design provides inherent shielding In situ treatment if there is a high risk and cost of exhumation Volume reduction typically 25-50% for soil, more for other wastes Excellent waste form highly durable Demonstrated capability proven in other applications Cost vspermanence excellent value

GeoMelthas been deployed successfullyat commercial waste treatment facilities and site remediation projects to treat radioactive and hazardous wastes around the world. GeoMeltis capable of simultaneously processing organic, inorganic, and radioactive contaminants. GeoMelthas a high tolerance for debrissuch as concrete, scrap metal, plastic, and wood. GeoMeltdemonstrates unequaled residual product properties such as leach resistance, strength, and weathering resistance. GeoMelthas obtained a high degree of publicand regulatory acceptance. GeoMeltwill result in a final waste form that provides a disposition path for problematic waste streams.

GeoMeltDemonstration Unit scheduled for delivery and installation at AMEC s Birchwood Facility by March, 2010 Followed by commissioning and training of UK staff AMEC s facility available for trial work to prove GeoMeltin the UK Ability to undertake active trials Associated waste management consultancy