EFFECT OF SLAUGHTER DATE ON PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY OF FEEDLOT STEERS. Story in Brief

Similar documents
PERFORMANCE OF NURSING CALVES FED SUPPLEMENT WITH VARYING PROTEIN LEVELS. D. B. Faulkner and F. A. Ireland

EFFECTS OF LIMIT FEEDING ON FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS

EFFECTS OF LIMITING FEED ACCESS TIME ON PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS OF FEEDLOT STEERS

FACTORS INFLUENCING PROFITABILITY OF FEEDLOT STEERS

Value of Modified Wet Distillers Grains in Cattle Diets without Corn

EFFECT OF SIRE BREED ON STEER PERFORMANCE, CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS, BOXED BEEF YIELDS AND MEAT TENDERNESS

Effect of Angus and Charolais Sires with Early vs Normal Weaned Calves on Feedlot Performance and Carcass Characteristics

Performance and Economic Analysis of Calf-Fed and Yearling Systems for Fall-Born Calves

Wheat Pasture Intake by Early-Weaned Calves

Key Points. Introduction. Materials and Methods. Sides G, PhD * ; Swingle S, PhD ** January 2008

Key words: Beef feedlot, performance, natural supplement

Extruded complete feed for finishing cattle

The Professional Animal Feeding Scientist Cull Cows 19 (2003):

Strategies for Optimizing Value of Finished Cattle in Value-Based Marketing Grids

Post-Weaning Nutritional Management Affects Feedlot Performance, 12 th Rib Fat, and Marbling Deposition of Angus and Wagyu Heifers

Effect of Backgrounding System on Performance and Profitability of Yearling Beef Steers

Performance and Carcass Traits of Market Beef Cattle Supplemented Self-Fed Byproducts on Pasture: Final Report

Effect of Feed Delivery Management on Yearling Steer Performance

Effects of a High-linoleic Sunflower Seed Supplement on Performance and Reproduction of Primiparous Beef Cows and their Calves

An evaluation of the USDA standards for feeder cattle frame size and muscle thickness

Use of Soybean Hulls as a Complementary Feedstuff to Winter Rye Pasture

Ultrasound feedlot sorting. Evaluation of feedlot sorting system using ultrasound and computer technology

The Use of Real-Time Ultrasound to Predict Live Feedlot Cattle Carcass Value

EFFECT OF GRAZING TALL FESCUE ENDOPHYTE TYPES ON SUBSEQUENT FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY

Integration of Pasturing Systems for Cattle Finishing Programs

A Summary of Feeding Market Cows for the White Fat Cow Market

Factors affecting carcass value and profitability in early-weaned Simmental steers: II. Days on feed endpoints and sorting strategies

BODY COMPOSITION GRAZING OR FEEDLOT STEERS DIFFERING IN AGE AND BACKGROUND

Traits of Cattle That Hit the Quality Target Gary D. Fike Feedlot Specialist Certified Angus Beef LLC

The Use of Real-Time Ultrasound to Predict Live Feedlot Cattle Carcass Value

Making Beef Out of Dairy

BEEF South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 2. South Dakota State University, Rapid City, SD 3

A Seven Year Summary of Feeding Cull Market Cows

The Effects of Supplementation and Forage Source on Performance of Steers During Fall Backgrounding

Relationship of USDA marbling groups with palatability of beef longissimus muscle

Integration of Pasturing Systems for Cattle Finishing Programs: A Progress Report

Comparison of Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits Among Various Three-Breed Cross Calves

The Big Picture: Road ahead for the cattle business

R. Smith 1, K. Rogers 2, S. Huse 3, M. Wray 4, B. Brandt 5, J. Hutcheson 5, W. Nichols 5, F. Taylor 5, and J. Rains 5. Summary

Consideration of Weaning Time, Implanting Strategies and Carcass Data on Cow-Calf Decisions

Effect of Residual Feed Intake, Gender, and Breed Composition on Plasma Urea Nitrogen Concentration in an Angus-Brahman Multibreed Herd

Improving the Value of Cull Cows by Feeding Prior to Slaughter 1

R. L. Preston, W. B. Kunkle and V. R. Cahill Department of Animal Science. Abstract

Effects of Supplemental Undegradable Protein on the Performance of Fall-Calving Cows Grazing Dormant Native Range

Feedlot Nutrition for Holsteins

Cull Cow Meat Quality

Influence of Cow BCS and Late Gestation Supplementation: Effects on Cow and Calf Performance 1

Changes In Growth Performance Of Steers And Nutritive Value Of Wheat Pasture From Fall/Winter Grazing To Graze-Out

Factors Affecting Lot Low Choice and Above and Lot Premium Choice Acceptance Rate of Beef Calves in the Tri-County Steer Carcass Futurity Program

Distillers Grains Feeding and Beef Quality

Effect of field pea-flaxseed blends on calf weaning performance, immune response, feedlot performance carcass quality and economics.

What Value Looks Like to a Feedyard. By Tom Brink

Stocker and Finishing Programs For Fall-Weaned Calves

Heterosis and Breed Effects for Beef Traits of Brahman Purebred and Crossbred Steers

Breeding Objectives Indicate Value of Genomics for Beef Cattle M. D. MacNeil, Delta G

THE EFFECTS OF GRAZING SYSTEM AND EARLY WEANING ON PRODUCTIVITY OF FALL CALVING COWS IN OKLAHOMA

LIMIT FEEDING CONCENTRATE DIETS TO BEEF COWS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO FEEDING HAY. David Lalman, Extension Beef Cattle Specialist OSU Animal Science

ECONOMICS OF FEEDING MARKET COWS USING DIFFERENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES 1

Performance of SE Cattle When Placed on Feed. Gary D. Fike Beef Cattle Specialist Certified Angus Beef LLC Manhattan, KS

Beef Cattle Management Update

Net feed efficiency and its Relationship to Carcass Quality of Fed Cattle, and Wintering Ability of Cows

RESIDUAL FEED INTAKE AND THE RELATIONSHIP WITH PERFORMANCE, TEMPERAMENT AND CARCASS TRAITS IN GROWING AND FINISHING STEERS

NUTRITION-COW-CALF AND STOCKER

TOPICS IN NUTRITIONAL MANAGEMENT OF FEEDLOT CATTLE

Effect of rotation crop, cover crop, and bale grazing on steer performance, carcass measurements, and carcass value

Fatty Acid Profiles and Content of Pasture- and Feedlot-Finished Beef Steers Supplemented with 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Prior to Harvest

Additive Genetic Parameters for Postweaning Growth, Feed Intake, and Ultrasound Traits in Angus-Brahman Multibreed Cattle

Effects of starch- versus fiber-based supplements during winter grazing on growth rate of stocker cattle and final carcass characteristics

Silage and wheat pasture for wintering and finishing weanling calves

Effect of Liveweight Gain During Winter on Organ Mass and Organ Mass Accretion During Subsequent Feedlot Finishing

The Effect of Winter Feed Levels on Steer Production

A Refresher Course on Finishing Cattle in Tennessee. Genetics, Quality and Efficient Production for Marketing

EEDERS DA. Report of Progress 773. Agricultural Experiment Station Kansas State University, Manhattan Marc A. Johnson, Director

Effects of Feeding Citrus Pulp Supplements on the Performance of Calves in a Preconditioning Program

INFLUENCE OF WEANING DATE (EARLY OR NORMAL) ON PERFORMANCE, HEALTH, AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS OF MAY BORN ANGUS CALVES

1999 American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting

Proceedings, State of Beef Conference November 7 and 8, 2018, North Platte, Nebraska COW SIZE AND COWHERD EFFICIENCY. Introduction

Beef Cattle Management Update

Feeding Bison Dr. Vern Anderson Carrington Research Extension Center North Dakota State University Box 219 Carrington ND USA 58421

An evaluation of genetic trends over 10 year period from data collected from the ABBA carcass evaluation program. Background

Effects of Internal Parasite Infection at Feedlot Arrival on Performance and Carcass Characteristics in Beef Steers

Prediction of Carcass Traits Using Live Animal Ultrasound

Research in Beef Cattle Nutrition and Management

Can We Select for RFI in Heifers?

DETERMINING FEED INTAKE AND FEED EFFICIENCY OF INDIVIDUAL CATTLE FED IN GROUPS

CHAMPION TOC INDEX. Finishing Cull Cows. Robert Hand and Brenda Ralston. Take Home Message. Considerations For Feedlot Finishing Cows

Effect of Body Weight Gain and Bovine Somatotropin Treatment on Plasma Concentrations of IGF-I in Postpartum Beef Cows

Impacts of Crossbreeding on Profitability in Vertically Coordinated Beef Industry Marketing Systems

VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA

Effects of Feeding Perennial Peanut Hay on Growth, Development, Attainment of Puberty, and Fertility in Beef Replacement Heifers

Breeding for Carcass Improvement

BEEF FACTS. The goal of the Center for Research and Knowledge Management at the National Cattlemen s Beef. Product Enhancement/Beef Safety

September Implications of Postweaning Nutrition on Carcass Characteristics and Feed Costs. Calendar. Dan Drake, Livestock Farm Advisor

Nutrition, facilities, and management of the Holstein steer. Steven Rust Michigan State University

Effect of Selected Characteristics on the Sale Price of Feeder Cattle in Eastern Oklahoma: 1997 & 1999 Summary

Effects of zilpaterol hydrochloride on growth rates, feed conversion, and carcass traits in calf-fed Holstein steers

Iowa 4-H Beef Carcass Summary

Comparison of target breeding weight and breeding date for replacement beef heifers and effects on subsequent reproduction and calf performance 1

Opportunities for Increasing Weight of Wheat Pasture and Grass Cattle

Producing slaughter steers with grain self-fed on pasture

Transcription:

EFFECT OF SLAUGHTER DATE ON PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY OF FEEDLOT STEERS M.T. Van Koevering1, DR Gi112,F.N. Owens2, H.G. Dolezal3 and C.A. Strasia4 Story in Brief Two hundred and fifty-six (256) crossbred yearling steers initially weighing 725 lb were used to study the effect of slaughter date on live performance and carcass characteristics. Steers were divided into four slaughter groups (64 steers) and fed for either 105, 119, 133 or 147 days. Daily gains (carcass adjusted basis) tended to increase in a quadratic manner while feed intake increased linearly as cattle were fed more days. Efficiency of feed conversion (carcass adjusted basis) greatest for steers fed 119 days. Carcass weight, subcutaneous fat thickness, KPH, overall carcass maturity, and yield grade increased linearly with slaughter date. Marbling score and the percentage of cattle grading U.S. Choice increased with time. Although performance and carcass traits increased with time on feed, feeding cattle more than 133 days did not appear to enhance performance or carcass quality. (Key Words: Feedlot Steers, Days on Feed, Carcass Quality.) Introduction The length of time cattle are fed high concentrate diets is dependent primarily upon the economics associated with seasonal changes in feed and cattle costs. Longer feeding periods for cattle of a given starting weight will increase final live weight, hot carcass weight, longissimus area, subcutaneous fat thickness, yield grade and quality grades (Hicks et al., 1987 and Dolezal et al., 1982), only some of which increase the value of cattle. Increases in subcutaneous fat thickness and yield grade are not conducive to increases in carcass quality and consumer interest. The objective of this experiment was to examine the effects of days on feed on performance and carcass quality. 1Research Associate 2Regents Professor 3Associate Professor 4Area Livestock Specialist 1993 Animal Science Research Report 191

Materials and Methods Two hundred and fifty-six crossbred steers (725 lb) were selected from a larger group (n=570) based on uniform size, weight and breed-type. Steers with greater than 25% Bos Indicus or Angus characteristics were removed. leaving steers of primarily British x Continental breed-type. Steers were processed routinely and implanted with an estrogenic implant (24 mg estradiol; Compudose@) at a commercial feedlot prior to arrival at Panhandle State University in Goodwell, OK. Upon arrival, steers were individually weighed. identified. and blocked into 4 weight groups based on initial weight. Sixteen steers from each weight group were randomly assigned to pens (8 steers/pen) and pens were assigned to specific slaughter dates. Eight pens (2 from each weight group) were assigned to be fed for a different number of days. Steers were fed for either 105, 119, 133 or 147 days. Steers were given ad libitum access to their high concentrate diets for the entire feeding period. Diet compositions and analyses are shown in Table l. Cottonseed hulls and chopped alfalfa, used as roughage sources, were removed stepwise from the diet to adapt cattle to their final diet. Steers were receiving their final ration by day 19 of the study. Cattle were weighed initially directly off the truck; these weights were used for allocation. Weight gain and feed efficiency were calculated based on initial shrunk weight and final live weights which were calculated from hot carcass weight /.6495, the mean dressing percentage for all cattle. Diet net energy values were calculated for each treatment using the 1977 yearling steer equation as reported by Hays et al. (1986). Cattle were slaughtered at a commercial plant. At slaughter, livers were examined for the presence and severity of abscesses. Carcass data for all slaughter groups were obtained approximately 48 hr postmortem; yield and quality grades were determined (USDA, 1989). Beta-hydroxy-f3-methylbutyrate (HMB), a metabolite of leucine, was imposed across this experiment to evaluate the effects of HMB on performance and carcass characteristics. Data were analyzed on a pen basis using least squares analysis (SAS,1988) with a linear model that included effects of HMB (df = I), weight block (df = 3), slaughter date (df = 3) and all two way interactions. Carcass data was regressed against the mean carcass weight and subcutaneous fat thickness. When a slope was significant, but the interaction was not significant, the adjusted means were reported. Least squares means were calculated and slaughter group means were compared using T-tests and ortho~onal contrasts. Results and Discussion The effects of slaughter date on performance are presented in Table 2. Final live weight increased (P<.05) resulting in a linear (L) increase (P<.OI) 192 Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station

Table 1. Composition of diets (dry matter basis). Diet Sequence Ingredient 1 2 3 4 Final Corn, rolled Alfalfa bay, pelleted Cottonseed hulls Molasses, cane Pelleted supplementa 40.20 25.00 25.00 50.20 20.00 20.00 (%) 60.20 15.00 15.00 70.20 10.00 10.00 82.20 Calculated Composition: Final Diet Nutrients DM% As Fed % Dry matter, % NEm, Mcal/kg NEg, Mcal/kg Crude protein, % K,% Ca,% P,% 100.00 2.09 1.33 11.90.70.54.32 87.80 1.84 1.17 10.45.62.48.28 asupplement composition: Cottonseed meal, 65.9%; calcium carbonate, 17.1%; urea, 9.49%; salt, 6.04%; dicalcium phosphate, 1.25%; vitamin A. D, E,.20%; Manganese Dioxide.02%. across slaughter group, but weight increased at a decreasing rate giving a quadratic (Q; P<.03) response. Hicks et ai. (1987) fed steers of similar weight for either 100, 114, 128 or 142 d, and reported similar L increases in final live weight. Carcass adjusted ADG (Table 2) was the greatest for steers fed 119 d, being 5.7 % greater (P<.05) than steers fed for 105 d but not significantly different from ADG of steers fed for 133 or 147 d. Daily feed intake of steers increased (L; P<.03) with days on feed. Steers fed 105 d consumed less (P<.05) feed than steers fed 133 d. Because feed intake generally is lower the first month than thereafter (Hicks et ai. 1990), longer feeding times will dilute this effect and give a higher mean feed intake for the total feeding period. Steers fed for 119 d bad superior (P<.05) feed efficiency (carcass adjusted basis) as 1993 Animal Science Research Report 193

Table 2. Effectsof days on feed on performance of feedlot steers.a - Days on feed 105 119 133 147 SEM No. of Pens S S S S No. of Steers 61 63 64 64 Initial wt., lb 727 727 725 725.10 Final wt., lbb 104lc 1105d 113Se 1175f 5.03 ADG, lb 3.00c 3.17d 3.1100 3.1100.02 Feed Intake, lb.lday 21.9c 22.000 22.9d 22.700.11 Feed/Gain 7.30d 6.97c 7.3Sd 7.31d.IS Calc. energy in diet ME, Mca1IlbDM 2.73c 2.S3d 2.76ce 2.S1de.02 NEIll. McalIcwt DM 77.6c S1.7d 7S.9ce SO.7de.91 NEg McalIcwt DM 50.Sc 54.0d 52.2ce 53,Sde.45 a Least squares means; SEM n = S. b Calculated as hot carcass weight/.6495 (average dressing % for all steers). c,d,e,f Means within a row with different superscripts differ (P<.05). compared to all other groups (Table 2). Dietary calculated net energy tended to increase (L; P<.OS)with slaughter groups. The effects of time on feed on carcass traits are illustrated in Table 3. Hot carcass weights increased L (P<.OI) but at a decreasing rate, resulting in a Q (P<.06) response across slaughter group. Dressing percentage was not altered by slaughter group in this study. Although carcass weights increased, ribeye area was not altered by slaughter group. Subcutaneous fat thickness (Table 3), however, increased (L; P<.OI) together with mean USDA yield grades and percentage of yield grades of 4 or greater (P<.07). The percentage of kidney, pelvic and heart fat (KPH) increased (L; P<.OI) with time on feed; with steers fed for less than 119 d having less (P<.05) KPH than steers fed more than 133 d (Table 3). The overall maturity of steer carcasses (Table 3) was greater (P<.05) for steers fed 119 d or greater than steers fed 105 d. Overall maturity increased at a decreasing rate, producing both L (P<.OI) and Q responses (P<.OS). When overall carcass maturity was adjusted to a mean fat thickness, the effect of slaughter group became C (P<.04), this is difficult to explain. The percentage of condemned livers was not affected by slaughter group. 194 Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station

J Table 3. Effects of slaughter group on carcass characteristics. a Days on Feed 105 119 133 147 SEM No. Pens 8 8 8 8 No. Steers 61 63 64 64 Carcass wt., Ib.b 679g 717h 739i 765i 7.36 Dressing, %C 65.1 65.3 64.8 65.6.25 Ribeye area, in2. 12.80 13.00 13.31 13.14.03 Subcutaneous Fat, in.34i.39hi.43gh.46g.02 KPH,% 1.48h 1.61h 2.03g 1.9Sg.02 Maturi 138g 145h 148h 149h 1.47 MaturitYde 138g 146gh 148h 144gh 2.12 Marbling Score! 377g 433h 452h 446h 11.48 Marbling Score!e 391g 442h 436h 4 109 8.16 Prime, % 0 1.79 0 0.89 Choice, % 33.93g 58.93h 68.75h 68.75h 5.52 Select, % 52.46g 39.29gh 31.25h 29.69h 4.45 Standard, % 13.62g Oh Oh 1.56h 1.47 USDA Yield Grade 2.12i 2.36hi 2.53gh 2.75g.09 Percent YG4 1.56h og 1.56h 9.38h 2.76 Condemned liver, % 12.72 10.94 9.38 12.50 5.39 a Least square means; SEM n = 8. b Carcass weight adjusted for trimloss. c Calculated by dividing final live weight by carcass weight. d Calculated by averaging lean and skeletal maturity. e Adjusted for fat thickness as a covariate. f 300-399, slight; 400-499, small g,h,ij Means within a row with different superscripts differ (P<.05). As time on feed is extended, marbling scores and percentage of U.S. Choice cattle are expected to increase. In this present study, marbling scores and the percentage of cattle grading choice (Table 3) increased (L; P<.OI) across slaughter group, but the values were not highest for steers fed 147 d; consequently we detected a Q (P<.02) response. Steers fed for 105 d were lower (P<.05) in both marbling score and percentage of cattle grading U.S. Choice than any other slaughter group. Inversely, the percentage of steers grading U.S. Select and Standard decreased (L; P<.OI) with inc~eased time on 1993 Animal Science Research Report 195

feed. Steers used by Hicks et ai. (1987) were of similar breed-type, weight and slaughter dates; their results are very consistent with ours for marbling score and percent U.S. Choice cattle. When marbling scores were adjusted to a mean fat thickness, marbling scores were the greatest (P<.05) for steers fed between 119 and 133 d. Steers in our population, similar to those of Hicks et ai. (1987), continued to deposit fat subcutaneously, but did not deposit an increased amount of intramuscular fat after 133 days on feed. When marbling scores were adjusted for s.c. fat thickness, there was no advantage of feeding steers more than 119 d. Thus, steers in both studies may have reached their genetic potential to grade U.S. Choice between 119 and 133 d. Many performance and carcass traits increase with increasing time on feed; however, in this study feeding cattle greater than 133 d did not appear to enhance performance or carcass quality. Literature Cited Dolezal, H. G., et ai. 1982. Effect of time-on-feed on palatability of rib steaks from steers and heifers. 1. Food Sci. 47:368. Hays, V. S., et ai. 1986. Calculating dietary net energy concentrations from feedlot performance data. Symposium Proceedings: Feed intake by beef cattle. Okla. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Rep. MP-12 1. Hicks, R B., et ai. 1987. The effect of slaughter date on carcass gain and carcass characteristics offeedlot steers. Okla. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Rep. MP-119:351. Hicks, R B., et ai. 1990. Dry matter intake by feedlot beef steers: Influence ofinitiai weight, time on feed and season of year received in yard. J. Anim. Sci. 68:254. SAS. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide (Release 6.03). SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC. USDA. 1989. OfficiaI United States standards for grades of carcass beef. AMS-USDA, Washington, D.C. 196 Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station