Locally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group. Mark Habiger NRCS

Similar documents
The 2014 Farm Bill. Texas Watershed Coordinators Roundtable Waco, Texas July 31, 2014

FARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions

NRCS Water Quality Practices

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Wetland Functional Assessment- Agricultural Lands. Kim Farrell Natural Resources Conservation Service U.S. Department of Agriculture October 13, 2015

Water Talk Series

Focus on Financial Resources. Kristin Lambert, WI DNR Chris Miller, NRCS

Agroforestry Treasures in the USDA Farm Bill

Draft Decision Memo Santiam Junction Maintenance Station Truck Shop Extension

Efficiency and Conservation in Agricultural Water Use

NRCS Standards and Criteria for Dead Animal Composting

Seasonal High Tunnels. Conservation Benefits Interim Practice Standard Financial Assistance Guidance

National Soil Health Initiative

Environmental Issues: Opportunities and Challenges for Grazing Dairies. By Kevin Ogles Grazing Specialist NRCS ENTSC Greensboro, NC

PROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project

NRCS Conservation Programs Update

Preliminary Decision Memo Recreation Residence Septic Repairs

BUDGET BASICS TRAINING TOPIC: DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS. Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)

Corn Objective Yield Survey Data,



United States and Canadian Cattle and Sheep

U.S.D.A. Forest Service National Forest & Grasslands in Texas Angelina National Forest Angelina/Sabine Ranger District Jasper County, Texas

Wheat Objective Yield Survey Data,

Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative

United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service

Woodland Planning for Success

Puerto Rico - Various

Michigan Wing-Civil Air Patrol

DECISION MEMO SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION FOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS

Dust Bowl and USDA - NRCS. Kim Wright USDA-NRCS Program Liaison Bryan, Texas

Draft Decision Memo OHV Trails 22 and 42 Reroute Project

Soybean Objective Yield Survey Data,

BANDIT TIMBER SALE Highlights Iron River Ranger District OTTAWA NATIONAL FOREST The Bandit Timber Sale Area is along the south side of FR 3110, 2.1 mi

The location of the valve site is displayed on a map in the project file.

DECISION MEMO. Bull Bear 1H-18 Oil and Gas Pipeline

Mob Grazing vs. Tight Grazing vs. Low Utilization

Notice of Solicitation of Applications for the Biorefinery, Renewable Chemical, and Biobased Product Manufacturing

Announcement of Class and Component Prices United States Department of Agriculture

Texas, Forest Inventory & Analysis Factsheet. James W. Bentley. Forested Area. Introduction. Inventory Volume

Announcement of Class and Component Prices United States Department of Agriculture

OUTREACH NOTICE DETAIL/VACANCY

Proposed Action. for the. North 40 Scrub Management Project

Announcement of Class and Component Prices United States Department of Agriculture

Announcement of Class and Component Prices United States Department of Agriculture

Hungry Creek Watershed Road Maintenance and Stony Quarry Development

Decision Memo. Programmatic Forest Plan Amendment for Cultural Resource Protection Standards and Guidelines. United States Department of Agriculture

N R C S. Farm Bill Projects on Vermont Vegetable and Berry Farms. Natural Resources Conservation Service

Bastrop & Caldwell County Water Resources

DECISION MEMO SFA EXPERIMENTAL FOREST HERBACEOUS POND RESTORATION AUGUST, 2009 ANGELINA/SABINE RANGER DISTRICT ANGELINA NATIONAL FOREST

LYLE FREES Water Quality Specialist, NRCS Phone:

Civil Rights Impact Analysis for Sault Ste. Marie Conveyance/Raco Construction Project

Facts on Direct-to-Consumer Food Marketing

Role of Woody Species in (Riparian) Buffer Plantings

Decision Memo Sawtooth Trail #3634 Reroute

DECISION MEMO. Steve Simpson and Associates, Inc. Simpson #114 & #116 Gas Well Project Compartment 106

Avg. AR IL IN IA KS KY LA MI MN MS MO NE NC ND OH SD TN WI. 18 Sts Avg. Jun 14, 2008 ID MN MT ND WA. 5 Sts

DECISION MEMO MANHATTAN FUELS REDUCTION PROJECT U.S. FOREST SERVICE CANYON LAKES RANGER DISTRICT LARIMER COUNTY, CO

Avg. AR IL IN IA KS KY LA MI MN MS MO NE NC ND OH SD TN WI. 18 Sts. 1 These 18 States planted 95% of last year's soybean acreage.

Effects of Reducing the Income Cap on Eligibility for Farm Program Payments

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

DECISION MEMO. Griz Thin (Stand )

On/Off periods Improvements Grazing System. 2 fence segments. 1 water development, 2 cattle guards

Forest Glen Recreation Residence Septic System Improvements Soils Report Shasta-Trinity National Forest January 2011

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

Stonewall Vegetation Project FEIS Errata

NRCS Progress in the Great Lakes Basin (Past, Present and Future)

Winter Wheat Seedings

Production per cow in the 23 major States averaged 1,830 pounds for July, 59 pounds above July 2009.

BACKGROUND DECISION. June 2016 Page 1 of 6

Moonlight Aquatic Organism Passage Project

Decision Memo. Cabin #5 Electric, Water, Septic Improvements

DECISION MEMO JASON MINE-BAT HABITAT IMPROVEMENT AND MINE CLOSURE Section 22, T. 13S., R. 2W. Union County, Illinois

Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Down 6 Percent

General Location: Approximately 6 miles east of Huntsville, Utah along the South Fork of the Ogden River (Figure 1)

Volunteerism for the Next Generation

Lambson Draw On/Off Allotment Livestock Conversion Decision Notice

Porcupine Vegetation and Road Management Project - Shasta Salamander Report - June 23, 2011

U.S. Broiler Industry Structure

DECISION MEMO. Newfield Exploration Company Mineral Proposal PDU ASH #K1MB Compartment 16

Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Up 5 Percent

2014 Farm Bill FACT SHEET. The Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program for 2015 and Subsequent Years

NRCS Conservation Planning and Use of Monitoring and Business Planning Information

Environmental Assessment for Jackson Thinning

Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Up 3 Percent

Decision Memo. North Fork Calispell Creek Restoration Project

WORKFORCE CONNECTIONS, INC. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES

DECISION MEMO FOURTH OF JULY PARK 2 USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Red River Ranger District, Nez Perce National Forest Idaho County, Idaho

KENTUCKY UTILITIES SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION AMENDMENT: MOUNT VICTORY TRANSMISSION TOWER REPLACEMENT DECISION MEMO

North Carolina, 2010

Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Up 5 Percent

DECISION MEMO 4-H Tree Farm LLC Driveway Permit

Fruit Wildlife Damage

Cattle on Feed. United States Cattle on Feed Up 5 Percent

SHASTA-MCCLOUD MANAGEMENT UNIT OVER SNOW VEHICLE TRAIL GROOMING AND SNOWMOBILE FACILITY MAINTENANCE PROPOSAL

Crop Progress. Cotton Bolls Opening Selected States [These 15 States planted 99% of the 2010 cotton acreage]

Drainage Water Management: Optimizing nutrient use while managing risk. Presented by: Rob Sampson NRCS National Water Management Engineer

Harvest, Employment, Exports, and Prices in Pacific Northwest Forests,

USDA NRCS GRP WHIP CSP

Proposed Action: In response to resource specialist concerns raised during internal scoping, the following restrictions will apply:

Transcription:

Locally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group Mark Habiger NRCS 1

What Is Locally Led Conservation? Community Stakeholders 1. Assessing their natural resource conservation needs 2. Setting community conservation goals 3. Developing an action plan 4. Obtaining resources to carry out the plan 5. Implementing solutions 6. Measuring their success 2

The Locally Led Principle Locally led conservation is based on the principle that community stakeholders are best suited to identify and resolve local natural resource problems. Thus, community stakeholders are keys to successfully managing and protecting their natural resources. It challenges neighbors, both urban and rural, to work together and take responsibility for addressing local resource needs. 3

What Does Local Mean? Local can be: 1. County 2. A Portion of a County 3. A Watershed 4. Multi-County Region 5. Other identified subdivision that has interested stakeholders. 4

Local Work Group Primary Focus Natural Resource Concerns Associated Socio-Economic Concerns Program Identification Stakeholder Commitment 5

Who Leads the Locally Led Effort? Local Soil and Water Conservation Districts are charged with this task NRCS officials facilitate the meeting Provide assistance in identifying conservation needs Provide technical and program advice Assist in developing implementation strategies 6

Public Involvement Anyone can participate Local, State and Federal Agencies Agricultural Organizations Local Agri-businesses Impacted Stakeholders 7

Local Work Group Meeting Objectives Identification of Priority Resource Concerns Methods and Programs Identified to address Resource Concerns Conservation Needs Assessment Developed 8

Local Work Group Meeting Outcomes NRCS Evaluates Stakeholder Input Adapts Priority Resource Concerns into Program Ranking Tools Publicizes Programs Implements Programs to Address Mutually Identified Resource Concerns

Local Work Group/Locally Led Process Questions??

State Technical Advisory Committee Background Required by the 1985 Food Security Act (1985 Farm Bill) Title XII The Secretary of Agriculture delegated implementation of the Committee to NRCS Chaired by NRCS STC, but used by other USDA Agencies when needed

State Technical Advisory Committee Committee Role Provide information, analysis, and recommendations regarding USDA programs Are an advisory group NRCS is charged to give strong consideration to recommendations of group

State Technical Advisory Committee Membership USDA Agencies and Committees Indian Tribes Association of Soil & Water Conservation Districts State Government Entities State Agricultural Organizations Agricultural Non-Profit Organizations Agribusinesses

State Technical Advisory Committee Texas Programs Agricultural Water Enhancement Program Conservation Innovation Grants Conservation Stewardship Program Environmental Quality Incentive Program Farm & Ranch Lands Protection Program

State Technical Advisory Committee Texas Programs (cont.) Grassland Reserve Program Wetlands Reserve Program Wildlife Habitat Incentive Program Cooperative Conservation Partnership Program

State Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Mechanics Chaired by the NRCS State Conservationist Held Annually usually in the Fall Involves oral discussions written comments appreciated Usually a full day meeting All comments are considered and implemented when and where appropriate

STAC/LWG Interface How Do These Meeting Fit Together? LWG sets the local priorities STAC helps determine state priorities LWG and STAC share the same members Both identify resource concerns Both determine resource concern priorities

Local Work Group State Technical Advisory Group Questions??

"The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer." 19