Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

Similar documents
Virtual Plant Training Manual Introduction to Simulator Based Operator Training

THE USE OF PROCESS MODELING SOFTWARE IN INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT - CASE STUDIES THAT ADDRESS AIR EMISSION, METALS REMOVAL AND WATER REUSE

CSR Process Simulations Can Help Municipalities Meet Stringent Nutrient Removal Requirements

Refinery Wastewater Process Modeling with GPS-X

Full Scale Testing to Demonstrate Anaerobic Selector Effect for Low Strength Wastewater

Global Leaders in Biological Wastewater Treatment

RE ENGINEERING O&M PRACTICES TO GET NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHOUT FACILITY UPGRADES

A Battle to Be the Best: A Comparison of Two Powerful Sidestream Treatment Technologies: Post Aerobic Digestion and Anammox

Efficient Design Configurations for Biological Nutrient Removal

Nutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP

Oxidation Ditch Technologies

NEWEA 2015 Annual Conference Session 16

Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation

Oxidation Ditch Technologies WATER TECHNOLOGIES

THE SEQUENCED AERATION PROCESS MONTAGUE, MASSACHUSETTS

Operation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

Case Study. Biological Help for the Human Race. Bathurst Municipal Wastewater Treatment Works, New South Wales, Australia.

City of Andover, Kansas Energy Assessment-Wastewater Treatment Plant

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

8/23/2018. Using Wastewater Treatment Simulators for Improving Operations. Thursday August 23, :00 3:00 PM EST

NITROGEN REMOVAL GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET COMPANY. Create Optimal Habitats

Secondary Treatment Process Control

OPTIMIZATION STUDY OF THE ST. MARY'S WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

General Operational Considerations in Nutrient and Wet Weather Flow Management for Wastewater Treatment Facilities Part II

COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS), MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) AND CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE (AS) PROCESSES

Right click on the influent element and select name. Type Influent in the box. This should change the name of your element to influent.

Comparison of Three Wet Weather Flow Treatment Alternatives to Increase Plant Capacity

ENHANCED BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHIN MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS. 255 Consumers Road Toronto, ON, Canada, M2J 5B6

Use of Biowin for Process Troubleshooting / Design for a Unique Wastewater

UPGRADING FOR TOTAL NITROGEN REMOVAL WITH A POROUS MEDIA IFAS SYSTEM

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

Upgrade of an Oxidation Ditch Using Bio-Mass Carriers

Presentation Outline

Assuming 100 gallons per capita per day, and 3 people per REU, design flows for the development are proposed to be:

Comparison of Three Wet Weather Flow Treatment Alternatives to Increase Plant Capacity

PLANNING FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL: WHAT STEPS CAN WE BE TAKING NOW?

Basildon AMTREAT LTP Commissioning of a high-rate ammonia removal plant. Oscar Hernandez-Ramirez Sarah Collins Steve Bungay

At the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection

Tales from the Field: Troubleshooting Denitrification

CORPORATION THE EXPERIENCED LEADER IN SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR TECHNOLOGY

No-Holds-Barred Match: RBC vs. MBR

20 Years of Nutrient Removal City of Beloit

TWO YEAR CASE STUDY OF INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS) AT BROOMFIELD, CO WWTP West 124th Street Broomfield, CO 80020

GPS-X Lite Exercises

Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

2015 Spring Conference

Startup and Performance of the World s first Large Scale Primary Dissolved Air Floatation Clarifier ABSTRACT KEYWORDS INTRODUCTION

ISAM SBR with Blower Assisted Jet Aeration Design Calculations For Lyons, CO WWTP Upgrade

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Case Study. BiOWiSH Aqua. Biological Help for the Human Race. Municipal Wastewater Bathurst Waste Water Treatment Works Australia.

Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010

Conceptual Design for a Future Wastewater Treatment Plant

Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.

Design, Construction and Startup of the First Enhanced Nutrient Removal Plant in Maryland Funded by the Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PLUS CHEMICAL POLISHING FOR LOW LEVEL COMPLIANCE

IWA Publishing 2012 Water Practice & Technology Vol 7 No 3 doi: /wpt

East Coast P Removal Technology Performance Summary

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

2.0 Nutrient Removal Alternatives

Dundalk Wastewater Treatment Plant

SECTION 6.0 NEWPCC CENTRATE TREATMENT

21 st Century Biofilm Reactors TREATING FOR TROUT. Northport/Leelanau Township Wastewater Treatment Facility. Presented by: Rich Grant, PE

ISAM INTEGRATED SURGE ANOXIC MIX

Appendix A: Case Studies

Wet Weather and Advanced Treatment: Procurement Strategies to Secure the Right Technology

Energy Reduction and Nutrient Removal in WWTPs Using Feed- Forward Process Control

Activated Sludge Process Control:

FURTHER EXPANDED FLOWS AND LOADS R3 INDUSTRIAL WWTP PROCESS ENGINEERING EVALUATION

SECTION 8.0 NEWPCC SECOND PRIORITY CONTROL ALTERNATIVES

City of Loveland Nutrient Removal Evaluation Final Report

Biological Phosphorous Removal Is Coming! Michigan Water Environment Association Annual Conference, June 23, 2008; Boyne Falls MI

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

Watertown Wastewater Facility Plan. August 11, 2015

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN WEST LORNE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

Process Monitoring for Biological and Chemical Nutrient Removal

MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN RODNEY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

Optimizing Nutrient Removal. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

Optimisation of the WWTP performance and design using computer simulation

BOD5 REMOVALS VIA BIOLOGICAL CONTACT AND BALLASTED CLARIFICATION FOR WET WEATHER M. COTTON; D. HOLLIMAN; B. FINCHER, R. DIMASSIMO (KRUGER, INC.

Energy Neutral Opportunities

Technical Memorandum No. 1

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Plant Facts:

Appendix C: TM T-49 Nampa WWTP Capacity Assessment

2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

AMMONIA REMOVAL USING MLE PROCESS EXPERIENCES AT BALLARAT NORTH. David Reyne. Central Highlands Water Authority

NUTRIENT REMOVAL PROCESSES IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT. We re Glad You re Here!

Bio-Tiger Model Biokinetic Model that Simulates Activated Sludge Processes

Wastewater Tools: Activated Sludge and Energy Use Analysis

Performance Evaluation of the Moores Creek Advanced Water Resource Recovery Facility

SEWPCC Upgrading/Expansion Conceptual Design Report. SECTION 6 - Process Flow Diagram / Mass Balance. Table of Contents

Membrane Bio-Reactors (MBRs) The Future of Wastewater Technology, Science and Economy Aspects

COMPARISON OF PROCESS ALTERNATIVES FOR ENHANCED NUTRIENT REMOVAL: PERSPECTIVES ON ENERGY REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS

Wet Weather Planning for Wastewater Treatment Plants

Transcription:

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

Agenda Review 2016 Challenge Provide overview of updates to 2017 event

Frequency WEFTEC Scores 6 Distribution of Team Scores - WEFTEC 2016 5 4 3 2 1 0 Score (out of a maximum 1000 points)

WEF 2016 Operations Challenge Laboratory Safety Collections Maintenance Process Control

WEF Operations Challenge 2016 Simulator platform for WEF Operations Challenge Realistic, challenging scenarios Operator friendly, and easy to use Tracks progress, enables scoring WEF Operations Challenge: Simulation as a Process Skill

SimuWorks Layout 2 Clickable Diagram 1 4 3 5 6 Instructions Data input panel 7 Flyover panel 8 9 Simulation control

Instructions - Using the Simulator 1. Click on Unit Process in Plant Diagram 2. Make Changes (repeat for each unit process as necessary) 3. Click on Start 4. Observe Results Step 1: Click on Unit Process Above

Instructions - Using the Simulator 1. Click on Unit Process in Plant Diagram 2. Make Changes (repeat for each unit process as necessary) 3. Click on Start 4. Observe Results Step 2: Adjust s

Instructions - Using the Simulator 1. Click on Unit Process in Plant Diagram 2. Make Changes (repeat for each unit process as necessary) 3. Click on Start 4. Observe Results Step 3: Press Start

Instructions - Using the Simulator 1. Click on Unit Process in Plant Diagram 2. Make Changes (repeat for each unit process as necessary) 3. Click on Start 4. Observe Results Step 4: See Results

15 Questions Challenge 1: High Effluent COD (50 Points) Challenge 2: High Effluent BOD 5 and NH 4 (75 Points) Challenge 3: High TKN with Energy Limit (100 Points) Challenge 4: High Effluent TN in Cold Weather (50 Points) Challenge 5: High Effluent TP (75 Points) Challenge 6: High BOD5, NH4 and Cold Temperature (50 Points) Challenge 7: High Total Nitrogen (TN) (75 Points) Challenge 8: Low SRT and MLSS (75 Points) Challenge 9: Energy and Chemical Cost Management (125 Points) Challenge 10: High-Strength Wastewater Treatment (50 Points) Challenge 11: SRT Control (75 Points) Challenge 12: Energy Management (75 Points) Challenge 13: Total Nitrogen Removal (50 Points) Challenge 14: Clarifier Maintenance (50 Points) Challenge 15: Cold Weather, No DO Controller (50 points)

Calculations Variable MLSS Calculation Solids concentration at the effluent from the aeration tank. mass of solids in bioreactor (Ibs) SRT SRT (days) = mass flow of waste activated sludge (Ibs/day) The dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration is reported from the end of the DO in Aeration Tank aeration tank. The total energy cost includes the following energy costs: Primary sludge pumping Aeration energy (blower power) Energy Cost Internal recycle pumping in aeration tank Recycled activated sludge (RAS) pumping Waste activated sludge (WAS) pumping The total chemical cost includes the following chemical costs: Primary ferric dosage for phosphorus removal Chemical Cost Secondary ferric dosage for phosphorus removal Methanol dosage for enhanced denitrification Sludge Production Sludge production is calculated as the solids concentration times the flow for all sludge (combined primary and secondary) being hauled from the gravity sludge thickeners.

Typical Operational s Units Low Range High Range MLSS mg/l 2,000 4,000 Food to Mass Ibs BOD/Ib 0.2 0.5 SS/day SRT Days 2 10 Primary Clarifier Gals/ft 2.day 500 1,500 Hydraulic Loading Secondary Clarifier Hydraulic Loading Gals/ft 2.day 200 800

Challenge 1: High Effluent COD The WWTP starts with low MLSS Effluent COD Dissolved Oxygen (DO) In Reactor < 20.0 mg/l 1.0-3.5 mg/l SRT is reasonable at 5.4 days. 3 secondary clarifiers off-line. DO is clearly very low No ammonia removal despite reasonable SRT Solution Adjust aeration Add secondary clarification

Challenge 1: High Effluent COD Effluent COD Dissolved Oxygen (DO) In Reactor < 20.0 mg/l 1.0-3.5 mg/l The targets can be met by making any of the following changes: Challenge 1 Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Aeration: DO (mg/l) 0.5, 0.5, 2, 2 2,2,2,2 Aeration: Flow (ft3/min) 2,000 Clarifiers Online 2 4 2

Challenge 2: High Effluent BOD 5 and NH 4 Effluent BOD 5 Effluent NH 4 MLSS < 5.0 mg/l < 1.0 mg/l > 2000 mg/l In this case, the WWTP starts with a very low MLSS SRT is a bit low at 4 days. 3 of the 4 secondary clarifiers offline. One aeration tank is offline The influent loading is 4 MGD (15,100 m 3 /d). Solution Resolve DO issues Evaluate need to bring on aeration tank Evaluate need to bring on additional clarifiers Adjust WAS rate

Challenge 2: High Effluent BOD 5 and NH 4 Effluent BOD 5 Effluent NH 4 MLSS < 5.0 mg/l < 1.0 mg/l > 2000 mg/l The targets can be met by making any of the following changes: Challenge 2 Option 1 Option 2 Aeration: DO (mg/l) 2, 2, 2, 2 2,2,2,2 Aeration: Flow (ft3/min) Aeration Tank Online 1 2 WAS Pump Rate 52,835 25,000 Clarifiers Online 2 4

Challenge 3: High TKN with Energy Limit DO in Bioreactor MLSS Total Energy Usage Effluent TKN 1.0-2.5 mg/l > 2000 mg/l 130000 $/yr < 5.0 mg/l Influent flow has a higher flow rate and higher COD concentration than Challenges 1 and 2. The WWTP plant starts off with a very low MLSS and SRT DO concentration is very high at 7.7 mg/l. Note that the energy consumption is also exceeding the target of $130,000/yr. Solution Resolve DO issues Evaluate need to bring on aeration tank Evaluate need to bring on additional clarifiers

Challenge 3: High TKN with Energy Limit DO in Bioreactor MLSS Total Energy Usage Effluent TKN 1.0-2.5 mg/l > 2000 mg/l 130000 $/yr < 5.0 mg/l The targets can be met by making any of the following changes: Challenge 3 Option 1 Option 2 Aeration: DO (mg/l) 0.5, 0.5, 2, 2 Aeration: Flow (ft3/min) 3,000 Aeration Tanks Online 1 1 WAS Pump Rate 40,000 50,000 Clarifier Online 2 4

Challenge 4: High Effluent TN in Cold Weather Effluent BOD 5 Effluent Total Nitrogen (TN) < 5.0 mg/l < 6.0 mg/l The influent flow and loading is similar to Challenge 3, but the liquid temperature at the WWTP is now 53 F (12 C). Note that one of the targets is now total nitrogen (TN) requiring a setup for denitrification. Solution Bring all systems online Set DO levels to enable Nitrification and Denitrification

Challenge 4: High Effluent TN in Cold Weather Effluent BOD 5 < 5.0 mg/l Effluent Total Nitrogen (TN) < 6.0 mg/l The targets can be met by making any of the following changes: Challenge 4 Option 1 Option 2 Aeration: DO (mg/l) 0.5, 0.5, 2, 2 0, 2, 2, 2 Aeration: Flow (ft3/min) Aeration Tank Online 2 2 WAS Pump Rate 52,834.60 30,000 Internal Recycle (MGD) 0.00 4 Clarifiers Online 4 4

Challenge 5: High Effluent TP Effluent TSS Effluent Total Phosphorus (TP) Chemical Dosage Cost < 8.0 mg/l < 1.0 mg/l < $65,000 /yr Influent flow and loading is similar to Challenge 4; the liquid temperature at the WWTP is 53 F (12 C). s now include Total Phosphorus (TP), which will require dosing ferric chloride Chemical dosage cost must be under $65,000/yr. Solution Bring all systems online Shut off methanol dosage Apply Ferric to Preliminary and Secondary dosage points

Challenge 5: High Effluent TP Effluent TSS Effluent Total Phosphorus (TP) Chemical Dosage Cost < 8.0 mg/l < 1.0 mg/l < $65,000 /yr The targets can be met by making any of the following changes: Challenge 5 Option 1 Option 2 Aeration: DO (mg/l) Aeration: Flow (ft3/min) Aeration Tanks Online 2 2 WAS Pump Rate Methanol Dosage 0.00 0 Internal Recycle (MGD) Primary Ferric (Ib Me/day) 200.00 150 Secondary Ferric 200.00 250 Clarifier Online 4 4

Challenge 6: High BOD 5, NH 4 and Cold Temperature Effluent BOD 5 Effluent NH 4 < 10 mg/l < 1.0 mg/l Similar to Challenge 5, the influent flow is 4 MGD (15,100 m 3 /d), with a slightly lower COD concentration and temperature of 53 F (12 C). Effluent targets of BOD 5 and NH 4 are not being met when the simulation starts. DO appears to be reasonable at about 1.3 mg/l Solution Bring all systems online Set DO levels to enable Nitrification and Denitrification Adjust Ferric dosage to make P available for bio-treatment

Challenge 6: High BOD 5, NH 4 and Cold Temperature Effluent BOD 5 Effluent NH 4 < 10 mg/l < 1.0 mg/l The targets can be met by making either of the following changes: Challenge 6 Option 1 Option 2 Aeration: DO (mg/l) 2,2,2,2 2,2,2,2 Aeration: Flow (ft3/min) Aeration Tanks Online 2 2 WAS Pump Rate Methanol Dosage Internal Recycle (MGD) Primary Ferric (Ib Me/day) 200.00 0 Secondary Ferric 1,200 0 Clarifiers Online 4 4

Challenge 7: High Total Nitrogen (TN) Total Nitrogen (TN) Chemical Dosage Cost < 8.0 mg/l < 100,000 $/yr Influent is 2.2 MGD (8,300 m 3 /d) at a temperature of 75 F (24 C) Relatively low influent COD of 300 mg/l, but a high influent ammonia of 37 mg/l. The target is for Total Nitrogen removal, so denitrification will be required. The WWTP plant starts off with a very low MLSS and SRT. Solution Bring all systems online Set Aeration levels to enable Nitrification and Denitrification Adjust methanol to reduce cost Adjust WAS to enhance SRT Adjust Internal Recycle

Challenge 7: High Total Nitrogen (TN) Total Nitrogen (TN) Chemical Dosage Cost < 8.0 mg/l < 100,000 $/yr The targets can be met by making either of the following changes: Challenge 7 Option 1 Option 2 Aeration: DO (mg/l) 0, 2,2,2 Aeration: Flow (ft3/min) 2,000 Aeration Tanks Online 2 2 WAS Pump Rate (gpd) 50,000 100,000 Methanol Dosage (gpd) 300 300 Internal Recycle (MGD) 5 Primary Ferric (Ib Me/day) Secondary Ferric Clarifiers Online 4 4

Challenge 8: Low SRT and MLSS Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS) SRT Effluent TSS > 2500 mg/l 6-12 days < 10.0 mg/l Influent flow is 5 MGD (18,900 m 3 /d). The concentrations and temperature have been reset to their defaults. WWTP starts out with a reasonable MLSS of ~2,000 mg/l and SRT of 5.4 days. Solution Bring all systems online Adjust aeration settings Adjust WAS rate

Challenge 8: Low SRT and MLSS Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS) SRT Effluent TSS > 2500 mg/l 6-12 days < 10.0 mg/l The targets can be met by making either of the following changes: Challenge 8 Option 1 Option 2 Aeration: DO (mg/l) 2,2,2,2 Aeration: Flow (ft3/min) 1,500 Aeration Tanks Online 2 2 WAS Pump Rate (gpd) 40,000 25,000 Methanol Dosage (gpd) Internal Recycle (MGD) Primary Ferric (Ib Me/day) Secondary Ferric Clarifier Online 4 4

Challenge 9: Low SRT and MLSS Effluent TSS Effluent TKN Effluent Total Phosphorus (TP) < 10.0 mg/l < 5.0 mg/l < 1.0 mg/l Energy Cost < $175,000 Chemical Dosage Cost < $65,000 Influent flow is the same as Challenge 8 However there are now 5 target conditions, including limits on both energy and chemical cost. WWTP start with low MLSS and SRT, and several units off-line. The DO in the aeration basin is higher than normal at 7.5 mg/l. Solution Bring all systems online Adjust aeration settings Adjust WAS rate Adjust Ferric dosage

Challenge 9: Low SRT and MLSS Effluent TSS Effluent TKN Effluent Total Phosphorus (TP) < 10.0 mg/l < 5.0 mg/l < 1.0 mg/l Energy Cost < $175,000 Chemical Dosage Cost < $65,000 The targets can be met by making either of the following changes: Challenge 9 Option 1 Option 2 Aeration: DO (mg/l) 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5 Aeration: Flow (ft3/min) 5,000 Aeration Tanks Online 2 2 WAS Pump Rate 70,000 65,000 Methanol Dosage Internal Recycle (MGD) Primary Ferric (Ib Me/day) 200.00 200.00 Secondary Ferric 200.00 200.00 Clarifiers Online 4 4

Challenge 10: High-Strength Wastewater Treatment Effluent COD Airflow to Aeration Tanks < 130.0 mg/l < 3500 ft3/min (2375 m3/hr) Influent COD concentration is 750 mg/l, reflecting some high-strength waste in the influent. Influent flow rate is 5 MGD (18,900 m 3 /d), as in Challenge 8. All available reactors and clarifiers are already on-line. The targets include both the effluent COD as well as the airflow rate in the aeration tank. Solution Adjust aeration settings Adjust Ferric dosage Adjust WAS rate

Challenge 10: High-Strength Wastewater Treatment Effluent COD Airflow to Aeration Tanks < 130.0 mg/l < 3500 ft3/min (2375 m3/hr) The targets can be met by making either of the following changes: Challenge 10 Option 1 Option 2 Aeration: DO (mg/l) Aeration: Flow (ft3/min) 3,400 3,500 Aeration Tank Online WAS Pump Rate 80,000 50,000 Methanol Dosage Internal Recycle (MGD) Primary Ferric (Ib Me/day) 200.00 0.00 Secondary Ferric 200.00 0.00 Clarifier Online

Challenge 11: SRT Control BOD 5 SRT Effluent Soluble Ortho- Phosphorus < 7.0 mg/l 6-8 days < 0.1 mg/l Influent is 4 MGD (15,100 m 3 /d), with a COD concentration of 520 mg/l at 72 F (22 C). The plant starts with a very low MLSS. The goal is to achieve a SRT of 6 to 8 days, while also meeting the BOD5 and soluble phosphorus targets. Solution Bring clarifiers online Set DO control at default values Adjust sludge wastage Adjust Ferric dosage

Challenge 11: SRT Control BOD 5 SRT Effluent Soluble Ortho- Phosphorus < 7.0 mg/l 6-8 days < 0.1 mg/l The targets can be met by making either of the following changes: Challenge 11 Option 1 Option 2 Aeration: DO (mg/l) 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5 2,2,2,2 Aeration: Flow (ft3/min) Aeration Tank Online WAS Pump Rate 65,000 75,000 Methanol Dosage Internal Recycle (MGD) Primary Ferric (Ib Me/day) 400.00 300.00 Secondary Ferric 400.00 400.00 Clarifier Online 4 4

Challenge 12: Energy Management BOD 5 TKN Total Energy Cost < 10.0 mg/l < 3.0 mg/l < $190,000/yr Influent loading is very high (flow = 6 MGD, COD = 520 mg/l), and the temperature is 53 F (12 C). Simulation starts with very low MLSS and SRT, with a high DO of 4.7 mg/l in the aeration basin. s require BOD 5 removal and full nitrification, while keeping the total energy expenditure below $190,000. Solution Bring all systems online Adjust aeration Adjust sludge wastage Adjust RAS flow

Challenge 12: Energy Management BOD 5 TKN Total Energy Cost < 10.0 mg/l < 3.0 mg/l < $190,000/yr The targets can be met by making either of the following changes: Challenge 12 Option 1 Option 2 Aeration: DO (mg/l) Aeration: Flow (ft3/min) 4,500 4,450 Aeration Tank Online 2 2 WAS Pump Rate (gpd) 170,000 180,000 Methanol Dosage RAS Pump Rate (MGD) 4 5 Internal Recycle (MGD) Primary Ferric (Ib Me/day) Secondary Ferric Clarifier Online 4 4

Challenge 13: Total Nitrogen Removal Total Nitrogen (TN) Total Chemical Cost < 10.0 mg/l < $75,000/yr Influent flow is 8 MGD, with an ammonia concentration of 40 mg/l. The Total Nitrogen effluent target of 10 mg/l requires full nitrification and denitrification. The simulation starts with a low MLSS and SRT. Solution Bring all systems online Adjust aeration Adjust internal recycle Adjust sludge wastage Adjust RAS flow Adjust methanol dosage

Challenge 13: Energy Management Total Nitrogen (TN) Total Chemical Cost < 10.0 mg/l < $75,000/yr The targets can be met by making either of the following changes: Challenge 13 Option 1 Option 2 Aeration: DO (mg/l) 0, 2, 2, 2 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5 Aeration: Flow (ft3/min) Aeration Tanks Online 2 1 WAS Pump Rate (gpd) 180,000 Methanol Dosage (gpd) 240 200 Internal Recycle (MGD) 25.00 10.00 RAS (MGD) 8.00 8.00 Primary Ferric (Ib Me/day) Secondary Ferric Clarifiers Online 4 4

Challenge 14: Clarifier Maintenance BOD 5 MLSS < 7.0 mg/l > 3000 mg/l Two of the secondary clarifiers are out of service for maintenance & cannot be put back in service. Influent flow is 2.2 MGD, with default influent characterizations. The simulation starts with a very low MLSS of 704 mg/l. Solution Bring one clarifier online Adjust aeration Adjust sludge wastage

Challenge 14: Clarifier Maintenance BOD 5 MLSS < 7.0 mg/l > 3000 mg/l The targets can be met by making either of the following changes: Challenge 14 Option 1 Option 2 Aeration: DO (mg/l) 2,2,2,2 2,2,2,2 Aeration: Flow (ft3/min) Aeration Tank Online 1 1 WAS Pump Rate 4,000 5,500 Methanol Dosage RAS (MGD) 1.4 Internal Recycle (MGD) Primary Ferric (Ib Me/day) Secondary Ferric Clarifier Online 2

Challenge 15: Cold Weather, No DO Controller SRT Dissolved Oxygen (DO) in Aeration Tank 10-12 days 1.0-3.0 mg/l Influent flow is 4 MGD (15,100 m 3 /d) with a relatively high COD concentration of 520 mg/l, and temperature of 53 F (12 C). Note that in this question, the DO Controller option is not available. The simulation starts with a low MLSS and DO concentration in the aeration tank. Solution Adjust aeration Adjust sludge wastage

Challenge 15: Cold Weather, No DO Controller SRT Dissolved Oxygen (DO) in Aeration Tank 10-12 days 1.0-3.0 mg/l The targets can be met by making either of the following changes: Challenge 15 Option 1 Option 2 Aeration: DO (mg/l) Aeration: Flow (ft3/min) 3,600 4,000 Aeration Tank Online WAS Pump Rate (gpd) 40,000 45,000 Methanol Dosage Internal Recycle (MGD) Primary Ferric (Ib Me/day) Secondary Ferric Clarifiers Online 1 4

2017 Updates (coming soon..) Full plant layout Expanded operational summary Digester operations Disinfection

Demonstration

Wastewater Flight Simulator Advanced operator training and education Identification and validation of plant optimization and cost saving strategies Project and risk analysis Key decision making support tool for all levels of management Engagement with stakeholders

SimuWorks Bird s eye view 3D simplified representation Replicate Plant SCADA

Contact us for Customized Virtual Plant Simulators

Features & Costs of SimuWorks

Support at Hydromantis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqccalcplug https://www.youtube.com/user/hydromantis http://www.hydromantis.com/optool/request-form.html Contact us: support@hydromantis.com fabiyi@hydromantis.com

@Hydromantis facebook.com/hydromantis linkedin.com/company/hydromantis-inc.