ABSTRACT. The Guidelines Section C is related to the classification and grading approach of NSQ100 (Chapters & 4.1.3).

Similar documents
Page 1 / 11. Version 0 June 2014

Graded approach practices for the mechanical components of French research reactor projects

Nuclear Quality Standard Association

Ensuring a nuclear power plant s safety functions in provision for failures

Safety Classification of Structures, Systems and Components in Nuclear Power Plants

CONSTRUCTION SECTOR STANDARDIZATION GUIDANCE DOCUMENT

COMPARISON OF PROCESS HAZARD ANALYSIS (PHA) METHODS

Nuclear Quality Standard Association General information about Quality Management System in the nuclear industry

EA-7/04 Legal Compliance as a part of accredited ISO 14001: 2004 certification

Management System Requirements

Joint ICTP-IAEA Essential Knowledge Workshop on Deterministic Safety Analysis and Engineering Aspects Important to Safety. Trieste,12-23 October 2015

Design requirements for nuclear power plant electric, instrumentation and control systems and components

Certification program "Quality Mark TMT" Checklist initial surveillance inspection

ISO 22000:2005 Standard INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS REGISTRATIONS

Abu Dhabi Certification Scheme for Polyethylene Plastic Pipe Systems Used for Utilities

Guidance on the Application. of ISO / IEC Accreditation International Association for Certifying Bodies

GENERAL CONTENTS SECTION I - NUCLEAR ISLAND COMPONENTS

SOLAR KEYMARK SPECIFIC SCHEME RULES ANNEX E: FACTORY PRODUCTION CONTROL INFORMATIVE BASED ON ISO 9001 STANDARD COVERING THE PRODUCTION LINE

Frazier Reliability Solutions

Association of American Railroads Quality Assurance System Evaluation (QASE) Checklist Rev. 1/12/2017

ASI National Structural Steelwork Compliance Scheme. A Guide for Clients, Builders and Prime Contractors

Guidance from the Group of Notified Bodies for the Construction Products Directive 89/106/EEC. unsupported systems" systems

GENERIC QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR: BUILT TO PRINT ITEMS, ITEMS TO STANDARD AND OFF THE SHELF ITEMS

From the Safety Approach of a Nuclear Power Plant, to the Manufacturing and Welding of Mechanical Components in line with RCC-M Code

RIS-2708-RST. Rail Industry Standard Freight Technical Committee Audit Protocol. Rail Industry Standard. Issue One: March 2015

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROTOCOL (QAP)

VALVES OF A NUCLEAR FACILITY

3 Manufacturer, testing and inspection organisation 5

UNI EN ISO 22000:2005 STANDARD CHECK-LIST

Supporting CE-Marking Obligations of Our Customers: The Role of the Galvanizer

REGULATORY CONTROL OF SAFETY AT NUCLEAR FACILITIES

DOCUMENT CONTROL INFORMATION

Safety Classification of Mechanical Components for Fusion Application

Transition Support A flexible approach to business improvement

GE/GN8640. Risk Evaluation and Assessment. Guidance on Planning an Application of the Common Safety Method on. Rail Industry Guidance Note

Use of PSA to Support the Safety Management of Nuclear Power Plants

Grading of the Management System Requirements to the Safe

IECQ PUBLICATION IECQ IEC Quality Assessment System for Electronic Components (IECQ System)

TUV SUD BABT PRODUCTION QUALITY CERTIFICATION SCHEME

CEN Keymark Scheme Rules for Thermostatic Radiator Valves. 2 nd Edition

CMI Guidance Document

Introduction and Revision of IEC 61508

Group Forest Management Certification Requirements

Business Continuity Policy

Conformity assessment and ISO CASCO for standards writers

Pressure Points. Governing Code Edition Section I Table of Contents

Office for Nuclear Regulation

ISO 22000:2005 SYSTEMKARAN ADVISER & INFORMATION CENTER SYSTEM KARAN ADVISER & INFORMATION CENTER FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ISO 22000:2005

Use of Manufacturers Laboratories For Surveillance Testing

UNIT 10 CLAUSE-WISE INTERPRETATION OF ISO 22000: 2005

Eur Ing Ian Hogarth CEng CIWE CEWE EWIE FWeldI Compliance Verification Engineer for TWI Certification Ltd.

CLASSIFICATION OF SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES AND COMPONENTS OF A NUCLEAR FACILITY

TÜV SÜD BABT Production Quality Certification Scheme

Chain of Custody Standard

REGULATION ON ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RESEARCH NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS

Railway Interface Planning Scheme Rules (RIPS Rules)

Specification for Quality Programs for the Petroleum, Petrochemical and Natural Gas Industry

INS QA Programme Requirements

Quality Assurance Policy

IECEx OPERATIONAL DOCUMENT

UR Startup Inc. ISO Audit Checklist. conducted for. Conducted on (Date and Time) 02 Aug :06 PM. Inspected by Andy Dion

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

ISCC 204 AUDIT REQUIREMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT. Version 3.0

AEROSPACE STANDARD. (R) Inspection and Test Quality Systems Requirements for Aviation, Space, and Defense Organizations RATIONALE

Microgeneration Installation Standard: MCS 001. MCS Contractor certification Scheme requirements Issue 3.0

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

Health and Safety Policy Standard

Chain of Custody Standard

EMIRATES AUTHORITY FOR STANDARDIZATION AND METROLOGY (ESMA) UAE.S :2014. Minimum Energy Efficiency Limits Rotodynamic Water Pumps

SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES

In case of of differences or inconsistencies with texts in the Main Contract, the stipulations in the Main Contract will prevail.

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS UNIFORM EVALUATION SERVICES

Ageing Management and Development of a Programme for Long Term Operation of Nuclear Power Plants

Nuclear power plant outages. 1 General 3. 2 General outage requirements 3

Microgeneration Installation Standard: MCS 001. MCS Contractor certification scheme requirements Issue 2.5

J. McCann & Co (Nottm) Ltd McCann House 110 Nottingham Road Chilwell Nottingham NG9 6DQ. Quality Manual

Safety Documents for Research Reactors

Ventilation systems and components of nuclear power plants

WELMEC European cooperation in legal metrology

CASS TOES FOR FUNCTIONAL SAFETY MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT (IEC : 2010)

PROOF/ÉPREUVE A ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Environmental management systems Specification with guidance for use

DIGESTER AIR-TIGHTNESS TESTS

Codes & Standards Comparison

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

ANCHOR ISO9001:2008 RPR-006 MARINE SERVICES REQUIRED PROCEDURE PREVENTATIVE ACTION

SQF 2000 Code. 6th Edition AUGUST A HACCP-Based Supplier Assurance Code for the Food Manufacturing and Distributing Industries

Overview of Draft API Standard 20M

Alaska Responsible Fisheries Management (RFM) Chain of Custody Standard Issue 2.4 November 2015

HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

ASME As a Help to Export! Our Topic today: Nuclear Quality Assurance ASME NQA 1

ACCREDITATION COMMISSION FOR CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES

REGULATION REGARDING EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT PROCESS AND APPROVAL OF MANUFACTURERS FOR NUCLEAR FACILITIES

Regulatory Guide 2.19

ISO /TS 29001:2010 SYSTEMKARAN ADVISER & INFORMATION CENTER SYSTEM KARAN ADVISER & INFORMATION CENTER

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Pressure Equipment Directive Global Conformity Assessment

F4E-QA QUALITY CLASSIFICATION

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

BABT Production Scheme 340

Transcription:

Page 1 / 11 ABSTRACT This document is the Section C to NSQ-100 Guidelines. Its objective is to help to the understanding of NSQ-100 requirements through some examples or recommendations and descriptions of industrial good practices. The Guidelines Section C is related to the classification and grading approach of NSQ100 (Chapters 4.1.2 & 4.1.3). Summary Chapter 1: Purpose of this section Chapter 2 : Guidelines The following questions are addressed : What does the wording nuclear safety and classification mean? What does the wording classification of items or activities mean? How to allocate the product safety classification to its constituents? How to understand consequences of their potential failure or malfunction? How to grade the quality requirements? How to pass on the quality requirements along the supply chain? How to deal with commercial grade items? Annex 1: Example of classification "NSQ100 is a registered trademark and is owned respectively by NQSA. These guidelines are protected by copyright and are the property of NQSA. No part of these guidelines may be reproduced, copied, downloaded or transmitted in any form and by any mean without the prior written consent of NQSA".

Page 2 / 11 CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE OF THIS SECTION The present section refers to NSQ-100 following chapters: 4.1 General requirements 4.1.2 & 4.1.3 only CHAPTER 2: GUIDELINES 4. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 4.1 General 4.1.2 Classification of product What does the wording nuclear safety and classification mean? Further to the general definition given at the chapter 3.9 of NSQ-100 and, having regard to practical considerations limited to the scope of this document, the nuclear safety must be considered as being: NUCLEAR SAFETY THE PROVISIONS TAKEN AT ALL CONSTRUCTION STEPS: DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT, MANUFACTURING AND COMMISSIONING TO PROTECT, IN ALL CIRCUMSTANCES, PERSONS AND THEIR NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AGAINST RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL DISPERSAL ensuring the normal operation of nuclear plants and facilities, Aiming at: preventing incidents and accidents limiting the consequences of a potential incident or accident The wording classification of product must be understood as the categorization of products (items and activities) with regard to their contribution to nuclear safety of an assembly or system.

Page 3 / 11 What does the wording classification of items or activities mean? These 3 above objectives () are examined by the Owner in the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR) as per the following scheme: All Systems Structures and Components (SSC) of a nuclear plant shall be identified and classified on the basis of their importance for safety. The classification of SSC shall be primarily based on deterministic methods, complemented where appropriate by probabilistic methods and engineering judgment. Supplier (Organisation) Contractor (Customer ) Owner PSAR EQUIPMENT SAFETY CLASSIFICATION LIST PURCHASING REQUIREMENTS CLASSIFICATION PROCEDURE AND RECORDS SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT or SYSTEM Quality requirements: Technical requirements ITEMS or ACTIVITIES (sub-parts of the product) Functional classification of systems based upon the plant states Safety Classes Safety Class #1, Safety Class #2, Safety Class #n, Not Classified. Technical splitting Mechanical (pressure), Mechanical (structure), Electrical, I&C. PLANT STATES: Requirements for Quality and Safety Management System Follow-up of product realization (= surveillance) Documentary requirements normal operation, anticipated operational occurrences, and design basis accident conditions. 3 SAFETY FUNCTIONS: Control of reactivity, Removal of heat from the core Confinement of radioactive material DESIGN CODE Or STANDARD (when applicable) Through the equipment which define(s) the safety class and the safety function of the supply and applicable code or standard Classification for the allocation of the purchasing requirements to the items or activities if: Important For Safety, or Having an impact on final product quality Application of design code or standard and/or Product technical analysis evaluation of the participation of each item or activity to ensure the safety function or final quality of the product

Page 4 / 11 How to allocate the product safety classification to its constituents? The PRODUCT has to be the object of a technical analysis by the organization (its manufacturer) in order to: determine the participation (impact) of each item (sub-component) of the product to the product safety function, the product key operating function or the product operating performance, identify each activity (task) which contributes (impacts) during: design, development, manufacturing, erection, commissioning and related services, to the product safety function, the product key operating function or the product operating performance. To perform this analysis, it may be useful to refer to one or more of the different type of methods as listed in EN 31010 standard (Risk management Risk assessment techniques). The output of the analysis could be formalized according to the following table: Item or Activity Direct or Indirect participation of the item or activity to the safety function of the product Contribution of the item or activity to the key operating function or the operating performance of the product #1 YES / NO YES / NO #2 YES / NO YES / NO #3 YES / NO YES / NO #n YES / NO YES / NO If one answer is YES for an item or activity, purchasing requirements have to be cascaded to the sub-supplier. Note: Refer to annex 1 for a practical example of classification. How to understand consequences of their potential failure or malfunction? In order to determine if the item or activity is must be classified as IFS, the analysis must take into account their level of participation (impact) on the safety function of the product: Level #1: Direct participation (impact) Potential failure or malfunction of the item or activity have systematically an impact on the safety function of the product. Example: Rupture of pressure vessel walls which have a direct impact on containment function. Level #2: Indirect participation (impact) Potential failure or malfunction of the item or activity may have an impact on the safety function of the product. Example: Internal part of a pressure vessel which detachment can induce an indirect impact on safety as a blocking of safety valve.

Page 5 / 11 4.1.3 Grading the application of Quality requirements How to grade the quality requirements? Having regard to the results of the above allocation, the organization must determine the level of quality requirements applicable to each item or activity. The requirements may be as follows (non exhaustive list which must be adapted to the item or activity): ITEM or ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS Organization Documentation Inspection Surveillance Status Level of requirements Impact QMS Document(s) to be issued by the organization before sub-contracting Record(s) to be issued by the organization to be issued by before the organization manufacturing surveillance Records to be issued by the organization End Of Manufacturing Report Certificate of compliance to the order the organization on its own activities performed by the organization on its supplier(s) activities Important For SAFETY (IFS) Impact on final product QUALITY OTHERS 1 2 3 4 Direct impact on Safety Indirect impact on Safety No impact on safety but impact on key operating function defined in the Technical Specification issued by the Customer No impact on safety but impact on operating performance(s) defined by the technical issued by the Organization No impact on the safety nor on the product quality NSQ100 Similar to ISO9001 Technical Preparatory documents for the Order + individual QC plan (*) Preparatory documents for the Order + individual or batch QC plan (*) Preparatory documents if required by the technical / / / All manufacturing & inspection records Only manufacturing & inspection records required by the technical Manufacturing & inspection records if required by the Order Surveillance report for the supplier(s) records / Issued by the organization manufacturin Issued by g the product the supplier or item of the product, item or activity Intervention for specific points Intervention for specified by the all points of the organization on QC plan it's supplier's QC plan Intervention only Final reception for points only if required defined in the by the technical technical / / / / (*) : Refer to Guidelines Section G [Production & Inspection] for more detailed information about QC plan. How to pass on the quality requirements along the supply chain? The organization has to pass on the NSQ100 requirements until the level of supply of raw materials, and in this last case, eventually with additional technical requirements to the commercial standard. Examples: Steel plate ordered according EN 10028-3 without additional technical requirements. The steel manufacturer has not to be NSQ100 compliant. Steel plate ordered according EN 10028-3 with additional technical requirements (e.g. Technical Specification of Reference from RCC-M). The steel manufacturer has to be NSQ100 compliant and this requirement shall have been included in the purchasing order issued by the organization. Note: Refer also to Guidelines Section F [Purchasing].

Page 6 / 11 How to deal with commercial grade items? Example to understand definition of Commercial grade item given in chapter 3.3 of NSQ-100. Case #1: Welded steel pressure tank If the welds of the tank need to be inspected during manufacturing, the tank cannot be considered as a commercial-grade item and, therefore, shall be manufactured by an organization compliant with NSQ-100. Case #2: Bolting If the bolt specification doesn't require any verification during manufacturing, therefore the bolt may be considered as a Commercial-grade item. Dedication of a commercial grade item to be used as an IFS item is an acceptance process undertaken to provide reasonable assurance that the item to be used will perform its intended safety function and, in this respect, is deemed equivalent to an item specifically designed and manufactured as being an IFS item. This assurance is achieved by: identification of the critical characteristics of the item, including the corresponding acceptance criteria, the selection and documentation of the dedication method(s) for determining compliance with acceptance criteria, and verification of commercial grade item acceptability by one or more of the following: product inspections or witness at hold-points at the manufacturer's facility, analysis of manufacturer s historical records for acceptable performance, tests or analyses performed by the purchaser or third-party dedicating entity after delivery, commercial grade surveys : technical evaluations or audits of the manufacturing facility. The dedication method will be made available to the customer and will be subject to customer approval in case manufacturing process of the item is contractually subject to customer surveillance.

Annex 1 Page 7 / 11 HOW TO PROCEED PRACTICALLY TO A CLASSIFICATION OF ITEMS OR ACTIVITIES? Preamble The following guidelines only apply to the case identified in the grey area of the hereunder sketch. In case of complex products (e.g. systems or assemblies), a more detailed approach and analysis shall be implemented. Nuclear Plant Circuit systems & assemblies Items Activities Non IFS items Non IFS activities Non IFS products IFS items IFS activities Note : Disregarding the classification analysis which might be performed by the organization, when the product has been considered as important for plant operation (then the Technical Specification issued by the Contractor formally identifies for the product the key operating functions), the Contractor may also require that some items or activities shall be classified as IFS or being submitted to a similar level of requirements.

Annex 1 Page 8 / 11 CLASSIFICATION METHODOLOGY The following steps should be respected to proceed to the classification of items or activities. Analysis of the Technical specification defining the product requirements in order to identify: a) the safety function(s) associated to the product. The safety function is determined by the Contractor and associated to the product through the attribution of a safety class to the product by the Contractor, the safety class level representing the criticality of the product having regard to safety considerations, and/or b) the product key operating function or operating performances (these operating performances may be quantified by numerical requirements, e.g. : flow for a pump, allowable pressure for a tank, ambient conditions as temperature or humidity.), Then, the product will be subject to identification of the constitutive items and activities used or implemented for its production (production must be understood here as meaning manufacturing that can include the fabrication of the material for the concerned items and/or assembling activities). For each item or activity identified after the above analysis, the organization will perform a technical analysis to determine: 1. whether the failure / malfunction of the item or the activity have, may have or don t have an impact on the: product safety function, or product key operating function, or product operating performances. Note: This analysis will be pursued up to the material of above concerned items, in order to identify whether specific characteristics specified by the designer for the material, may have an impact as indicated above 2. the particular requirement linked to the item or activity. Note: It might be necessary for deciding whether the items or the activity have an impact or not, to perform a risk analysis, combining both probability and consequence considerations. This risk analysis will have to be as simple as possible, considering that the conclusion will have to be formulated in a binary sense (yes or no). When an item or activity has been considered as impacting the product safety function or the product key operating function or product operating performances, the organization will: 1. whatever the item / activity supplied / performed by the organization or sub-contracted to others, determine the requirements (in terms of organization, documentation, inspection and surveillance) which will be applied. 2. in case of purchasing or sub-contracting the item / activity, pass on the applicable requirements to the selected supplier, (see the above 4.1.3 table of the guide How to pass on the quality requirements along the supply chain? ). Note: In some cases the item will only be available as a commercial grade item for which the above requirements 1 and 2 will involve a specific purchasing inspection & surveillance process (refer to above 4.1.3 How to deal with commercial grade items?

Annex 1 Page 9 / 11 Practical example Electro-mechanical pump Note: this example is not a real example but is just given to illustrate the expected classification activities to be performed by an organization. Pressure sensor Rotation sensor Bearing Welds Outlet flow Command Motor Impeller Fly wheel pan Fly wheel Motor frame Pump casing Inlet flow Shaft Shaft seal For an easy understanding, in the following text, it has been kept the same numbering of steps ( to ) as previously indicated in the above methodology. Analysis of the technical specification: The objective is to identify, within the technical / design specification, all the requirements, technical characteristics or role that the product has to respect or meet, and to define for each of them, which safety or operating category it is linked to. Hereafter is an example of categorization of the requirements, technical characteristics or role of the product as identified from the technical / design specification: Safety function of the product Key operating function of the product Operating performance of the product Other requirement (not significant) Pressure retaining for pump casing Pump shall continue running for some time (using a flywheel) after a plant shutdown Pump nominal flow rate (e.g. 10 m 3 /h) to be maintained during operation Standard mechanical protection for fly wheel pan

Annex 1 Page 10 / 11 Identification of the constitutive items and activities: Items: - pump casing Activities: - welding - shaft seal - pressure test - rotation sensor - functional test - pressure sensor - command device - shaft - impeller - bearings - motor - motor frame - fly wheel - fly wheel pan Technical analysis of the product: The objective is to determine the contribution of each item or activity in fulfilling the requirements (technical characteristics or roles of the product). This will enable to complete the following tables establishing the link between items or activities and their impact on safety functions and/or key operating functions or operating performances of the product: Item or Activity Pump casing Shaft seal Rotation sensor Pressure sensor Command Device Shaft Items Impeller Bearings Motor Motor frame Fly wheel Fly wheel pan Welding Activities Pressure test Functional test Contribution in fulfilling the requirements Pressure retaining requirement Pressure retaining requirement Pump flow rate Pressure retaining requirement (through action on safety valves) Pump flow rate Pump shall continue running after a plant shutdown Pump flow rate Pump shall continue running after a plant shutdown Pump flow rate Pump shall continue running after a plant shutdown (through conservation of shaft bearing structure) Pump shall continue running after a plant shutdown Standard mechanical protection Pressure retaining requirement Pressure retaining requirement Pump shall continue running after a plant shutdown Items Activities Item or Activity Product Safety function (Direct) Product safety function (Indirect) Impact on Product Key operating Function Product Operating Performance No impact Particular requirement Pump casing RCC-M Shaft seal Rotation sensor Pressure sensor RCC-E Command Device Shaft Impeller Bearings Motor RCC-E Motor frame Fly wheel Fly wheel pan Welding RCC-M Pressure test RCC-M Functional test RCC-E

Annex 1 Page 11 / 11 Determination and Grading of requirements (example limited to QMS requirements) Levels of Requirements and corresponding Management System specifications are defined in line with de definitions given in the table 4.1.3 of the guide. Item or Activity Level of Requirements Quality Management System specifications Pump casing 1 NSQ-100 Shaft seal 1 NSQ-100 Rotation sensor 3 ISO 9001 Pressure sensor 1 NSQ-100 command device 3 ISO 9001 Shaft 2 NSQ-100 Impeller 3 ISO 9001 Bearings 2 NSQ-100 Motor 3 ISO 9001 Motor frame 2 NSQ-100 Fly wheel 2 NSQ-100 Fly wheel pan 4 // Welding 1 NSQ-100 Pressure test 1 NSQ-100 Functional test 3 ISO 9001 As defined in the table 4.1.3 of the guide, for each item and activity, in accordance with the level of requirements defined here above, the set of requirements related to the documentation, inspection and surveillance will then be selected. Finally, in case some items or activities are planned to be sub-contracted, the organization will have to assess the potential sub-suppliers for their capacity to respecting all the requirements here above defined in terms of Quality Management System (QMS), documentation, inspection and surveillance that will be cascaded throughout the supply chain.