Biofilm Reactor Technology and Design

Similar documents
Figure Trickling Filter

CHAPTER 12 TRICKLING FILTER PLANTS

/ Marley MARPAK Modular Biomedia /

Best Practice in Sewage and Effluent Treatment Technologies

MARPAK modular biomedia WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Advantages & Applications of MBBR Technologies

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

Sludge recycling (optional) Figure Aerobic lagoon

New Developments in BioWin 5.3

CEE 371 Water and Wastewater Systems

Unit Treatment Processes in Water and Wastewater Engineering

Fixed-Film Processes

Inlet Process air and wash cycle scour air. Air grid Floor Nozzle

Water and Wastewater Engineering Dr. Ligy Philip Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Water Technologies. The AGAR Process: Make Your Plant Bigger Without Making it Bigger

Palmer Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Impacts. A summary of the impacts of this treatment alternative are listed below:

The High-Tech of a Creek. The Biofilm Technology for Large Wastewater Treatment Plants.

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

IMPROVED BIO-TOWER TECHNOLOGY MUNICIPAL SEWAGE TREATMENT

National University Of Kaohsiung Taiwan. T.Y.Yeh Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

USE OF A ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY WASTEWATER TREATMENT

COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS), MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) AND CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE (AS) PROCESSES

Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes II: MBBR Processes

Anaerobic reactor development for complex organic wastewater

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

BioWin 3. New Developments in BioWin. Created by process engineers.. for process engineers

SECTION 9.0 SEWPCC SECOND PRIORITY CONTROL ALTERNATIVES

Chapter 4 Alternatives for Centralized and Satellite Wastewater Treatment Facilities and Sites

MBBR Wastewater Treatment Processes

CHIP-Tuning of koi pond filters (RAS)

Environmental Engineering. Wastewater treatment Product Information

MEMBRANE AERATED BIOFILM REACTOR

Traditional Treatment

Wastewater Treatment Options For The Food Processing Industry. William F Ritter Professor Emeritus University of Delware July 27, 2018

Domestic Waste Water (Sewage): Collection, Treatment & Disposal

Physical and Chemical Processes for Advanced Wastewater Treatment

Presenters: Rodrigo Pena-Lang, PE (D&B Engineers), Magdalena Gasior, PE (D&B Engineers) and Paul D. Smith, PE (NYCDEP)

Evaluation of Different Nitrogen Control Strategies for a Combined Pre- and Post-Denitrification Plant

TABLE OF CONTENT SECTION I. ABSTRACT... x SECTION I MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR VERSUS BIOLOGICAL AERATED FILTRATION... XII

Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

New Developments in BioWin 4.0

TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER. Outline 17/02/2019. Microbes and Biological Treatment. Teknologi Industri Pertanian. Universitas Brawijaya. 1.

1/11/2016. Types and Characteristics of Microorganisms. Topic VI: Biological Treatment Processes. Learning Objectives:

A SUBMERGED ATTACHED GROWTH BIOREACTOR FOR DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER TREATMENT

BIOSPHERE MOVING BED BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS

THE INFLUENCE OF CARRIER SIZE AND SHAPE IN THE MOVING BED BIOFILM PROCESS

AnoxKaldnes MBBR. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

LITERATURE REVIEW CHAPTER Introduction. 2.2 Substrate removal in attached growth treatment process

TRICKLING FILTERS by Dr. Moazzam Ali Khan

AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) and Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS)

ONSITE TREATMENT. Amphidrome

NITROGEN REMOVAL USING SATURATED UPFLOW WOODY FIBER MEDIA. Larry D. Stephens, P.E. 1

Nitrogen Treatment in onsite septic systems The Big Picture

American Water College 2010

THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

START-UP OF TRICKLING FILTERS USING NOVEL FILTER MEDIUM UNDER LOW TEMPERATURE CONDITIONS

TREATMENT OF HOSPITAL WASTEWATER USING ACTIVATED SLUDGE COMBINED WITH BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR

ENVE 302 Environmental Engineering Unit Processes TRICKLING FILTERS ROTATING BILOGICAL CONTACTORS (RBC)

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MASTER PLAN 6. BUSINESS CASE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

Sustainable Wastewater Treatment

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Attached Growth Biological Systems

Trickling Filter and Trickling Filter- Suspended Growth Process Design and Operation: A State-of-the-Art Review

Diederik Rousseau Tineke Hooijmans. Anaerobic wastewater treatment

Enhancing activated sludge nitrification through seeding from a downstream nitrifying fixed-film reactor

Bioreactor System ERT 314. Sidang /2012

Model-based optimization of biofilm systems in wastewater treatment

Trickling Filters and Rotary Biological Contactors

Coupling Trickling Filter or RBC s with Activated Sludge

AnoxKaldnes MBBR. Biological Treatment of Wastewater WATER TECHNOLOGIES

Water and Wastewater Engineering Dr. Ligy Philip Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

TWO YEAR CASE STUDY OF INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS) AT BROOMFIELD, CO WWTP West 124th Street Broomfield, CO 80020

Utilizing algal oxygen production for advanced wastewater treatment in a Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) the Biologically Aerated Reactor (BAR )

Proprietary AquaTron technology incorporates three (3) innovative features that increase its efficiency and reduces cost:

Energy efficient process of nitrification and denitrification in activated sludge system with low organic load

DEVELOPMENT OF THE. Ken Mikkelson, Ph.D. Ed Lang Lloyd Johnson, P.E. Aqua Aerobic Systems, Inc.

American Water College 2010

An Introduction to Secondary Wastewater Treatment

1.1 History and Development of Wastewater Treatment

Research Progress of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal in Municipal Sewage

Using Compact Combined Constructed Wetland as Post Treatment for Biogas Wastewater

CARGESTCA - Characterization, Management and Treatment of Water Pollution

Packaged Wastewater Treatment Systems for Individual Homes and Small Communities. Mark Gross Orenco Systems, Inc. Sutherlin, OR USA.

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. Chemical Engineering department

Wastewater Characterisation and Treatment

Turbo4bio System For the Treatment of Sewage & Organic Effluents

BSEN Wastewater Final Report. Aquaponics Design. Group leader: Olivia Elliott. Group members: Elizabeth Bankston, Ann Nunnelley, Eric Vogt

Study on nitrification and denitrification of high nitrogen and COD load wastewater in moving bed biofilm reactor

2/22/2011. Presentation Outline. Overview of Wastewater Aeration. Basic Equation. Some Acronyms. dc dt. dc dt TDS BP T C L

Comparative Study of Different Technologies for Treating Municipal Wastewater- A Review

Nitrogen Removal from Milking Center Wastewater via Simultaneous Nitrification and Denitrification using a Biofilm Filtration System

Bio-Lair for Water Remediation

operation of continuous and batch reactors. Contrary to what happens in the batch reactor, the substrate (BOD) of the wastewater in the continuous rea

BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PLAYS AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN REDUCING THIS TOXIC ELEMENT TO SAFE LEVELS

Secondary Wastewater Treatment

Sanitary and Environmental Engineering I (4 th Year Civil)

Transcription:

Chapter 13 Biofilm Reactor Technology and Design 1.0 INTRODUCTION: BIOFILMS AND BIOFILM REACTORS IN MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT 13-5 1.1 Biofilm Reactor Compartments 13-8 1.2 Biofilm Processes, Structure, and Function 13-8 1.3 Bulk-Liquid Hydrodynamics 13-10 1.4 Biofilm Development and Detachment 13-12 2.0 BIOFILM REACTOR DESIGN APPROACHES, CONSIDERATIONS 13-15 2.1 Simplified Biofilm Reactor Design Approaches 13-16 2.1.1 Graphical Procedure 13-17 2.1.2 Empirical and Semi-Empirical Models 13-20 2.2 Mathematical Biofilm Models for the Practitioner 13-23 2.2.1 Why Should We Use Biofilm Models as a Design Tool? 13-23 2.2.2 Diffusion and Reaction in a One-Dimensional Biofilm: First- and Zero-Regions in Biofilm Reactors 13-25 2.2.3 Identifying the Rate-Limiting Substrate 13-29 2.2.4 Biofilm Models Used in Engineering Design 13-31 2.2.5 Limitations of Biofilm Models for the Practitioner 13-33 2.2.6 Wastewater Characterization 13-35 3.0 MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTORS 13-36 3.1 General Description 13-38 3.1.1 Plastic Biofilm Carriers 13-39 3.1.2 Media Retention Sieves 13-42 3.1.3 Aeration System 13-43 3.1.4 Mechanical Mixing Devices 13-44 3.2 Process Flow Sheets and Bioreactor Configurations 13-44 3.2.1 Carbon Oxidation 13-45 3.2.2 Nitrification 13-49 3.2.3 Denitrification 13-58 3.2.4 Phosphorus Limitations (Focus on Denitrification) 13-64 3.3 Design Considerations 13-66 3.3.1 Preliminary and Primary Treatment 13-66

3.3.2 Plastic Biofilm Carrier Media 13-66 3.3.3 Aeration System 13-68 3.3.4 Media Retention Sieves 13-70 3.3.5 Mechanical Mixing 13-71 3.3.6 Solids Separation 13-72 4.0 BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE FILTERS 13-73 4.1 Biologically Activate Filter Configurations 13-74 4.1.1 Downflow with Sunken Media 13-77 4.1.2 Upflow with Sunken Media 13-79 4.1.3 Upflow Biologically Activate Filter with Floating Media 13-81 4.1.4 Moving Bed, Continuous Backwash Filters 13-82 4.1.5 Non-Backwashing, Open-Structure Media Filters 13-84 4.2 Media for Use in Biologically Activated Filter Reactors 13-87 4.3 Backwashing and Air Scouring 13-87 4.4 Biologically Activated Filter Process Design 13-88 4.4.1 Secondary Treatment 13-90 4.4.2 Nitrification 13-94 4.4.3 Combined Nitrification and Denitrification 13-97 4.4.4 Tertiary Denitrification 13-99 4.4.5 Phosphorus Removal Considerations 13-104 4.5 Facility Design Considerations for Biologically Activated Filter Plants 13-105 4.5.1 Preliminary and Primary Treatment 13-105 4.5.2 Backwash Handling Facilities 13-105 4.5.3 Process Aeration 13-106 4.5.4 Supplemental Carbon Feed Facilities 13-109 5.0 EXPANDED AND FLUIDIZED BED BIOFILM REACTORS 13-109 5.1 Fluidized Bed Biofilm Reactor Advantages and Disadvantages 13-112 5.2 Fluidized Bed Biofilm Reactor Technology Status 13-115 5.2.1 History 13-115 5.2.2 Installations 13-115 5.3 Process Design 13-116 5.3.1 Typical Design Parameters 13-116 5.3.1.1 Vertical Flow Velocity 13-116 5.3.1.2 Recirculation 13-117 5.3.1.3 Flow Distribution 13-118 5.3.2 Media 13-120 5.3.3 Biofilm Thickness Control 13-124 5.3.4 Aeration 13-125

5.4 Pilot Testing 13-126 5.5 Fluidized Bed Biofilm Reactor Design Models 13-128 5.6 Design Considerations 13-128 5.6.1 Nitrification 13-128 5.6.2 Tertiary Denitrification 13-129 5.7 Design Example for Denitrification 13-130 5.8 Performance of Fluidized Bed Biofilm Reactor Fauna 13-133 5.9 Process Performance 13-133 5.9.1 Nitrogen Removal Rate 13-133 5.9.2 Temperature 13-135 6.0 ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTORS 13-136 6.1 Introduction 13-136 6.2 Carbon Oxidation 13-137 6.2.1 Monod Kinetic Model 13-137 6.2.2 Second-Order Model 13-138 6.2.3 Empirical Model 13-138 6.3 Nitrification 13-139 6.4 Media and Media Support Shaft 13-139 6.5 Covers 13-140 6.6 Biofilm Thickness Control 13-140 7.0 TRICKLING FILTERS 13-141 7.1 General Description 13-141 7.1.1 Distribution System 13-142 7.1.2 Biofilm Carriers 13-143 7.1.3 Containment Structure 13-148 7.1.4 Underdrain System and Ventilation 13-148 7.1.5 Trickling Filter Pumping Station 13-149 7.1.6 Hydraulic and Pollutant Loading 13-150 7.2 Process Flow Sheets and Bioreactor Configuration 13-151 7.2.1 Process Flow Diagrams 13-151 7.2.2 Bioreactor Classification 13-153 7.2.3 Hydraulics 13-155 7.3 Oxygen Requirements and Air Supply Alternatives 13-157 7.3.1 Natural Draft 13-158 7.3.2 Forced Ventilation 13-159 7.4 Trickling Filter Design Models 13-160 7.4.1 National Research Council Formula 13-161 7.4.2 Galler and Gotaas Formula 13-163

7.4.3 Kincannon and Stover Model 13-165 7.4.4 Velz Equation 13-165 7.4.5 Schulze Formula 13-166 7.4.6 Germain Formula 13-167 7.4.7 Eckenfelder Formula 13-168 7.4.8 Institution of Water and Environmental Management Formula 13-169 7.4.9 Logan Trickling Filter Model 13-170 7.4.10 Selecting a Trickling Filter Design Model 13-171 7.5 Combined Carbon Oxidation and Nitrification 13-173 7.6 Nitrifying Trickling Filters 13-178 7.6.1 Kinetics and Design Procedures 13-180 7.6.2 Gujer and Boller Model 13-182 7.6.3 Modified Gujer and Boller Model 13-184 7.6.4 Albertson and Okey Model 13-184 7.6.5 Comparisons of NTF Models 13-186 7.6.6 Temperature Effects 13-186 7.6.7 Hydraulic Application 13-187 7.7 Design Considerations 13-188 7.7.1 Distribution System 13-189 7.7.2 Hydraulic Propelled Distributors 13-189 7.7.3 Electronic or Mechanically Driven Distributors 13-190 7.7.4 Other Means for Distributor Speed Control 13-192 7.7.5 Trickling Filter Pumping Station or Dosing Siphon 13-193 7.7.6 Construction of Rotary Distributors 13-193 7.7.7 Filter Media 13-194 7.7.7.1 Media Selection 13-194 7.7.7.2 Filter Media Depth 13-195 7.7.7.3 Structural Integrity 13-196 7.8 Design Examples 13-198 7.8.1 Example 13.1: Biofilter Design for Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand Limitations 13-198 7.8.2 Example 13.2: Nitrifying Trickling Filter Design 13-200 7.8.3 Example 13.3: Organic and Hydraulic Loading 13-202 7.8.4 Example 13.4: Biofilter Classification and Distributor Adjustment 13-204 8.0 EMERGING BIOFILM REACTORS 13-205 8.1 Membrane Biofilm Reactors 13-206 8.1.1 Hydrogen-Based 13-207 8.1.2 Oxygen-Based 13-209

8.2 Suspended-Biofilm Reactors 13-210 8.2.1 Reactors Based on Aerobic Granules 13-210 8.2.2 Anammox Biofilm Reactors 13-211 8.2.3 Biofilm Airlift Reactors 13-212 8.2.4 Internal Circulation Reactor 13-213 9.0 REFERENCES 13-214