IRM in Specialty Crops. The Role of IR-4

Similar documents
The IR-4 Project 50 Years of Supporting Pest Control Products for Specialty Crops & Minor Uses

The Role of the IR-4 Project in Pest Management for Horticulture Crops Grown in the United States

IR-4 Update. IR-4 Western Regional Meeting March 14, 2012

IR-4 Project & Registration Process: Residues and Good Laboratory Practices

IR-4 Food Use Workshop Update

IR-4 Project International Activities Update. Dan Kunkel and Jerry Baron Associate Director and Executive Director, IR-4 Project

IR-4 Global Residue Studies Results and Potential Positive Outcomes for Agriculture

JMPR submissions and establishing Codex MRLs for specialty crops, their importance in global trade

Challenges and Considerations for Minor Uses in LATAM

Modernizing the Regulation of Pesticide Residues on Food Commodities. Jason Flint Health Canada Pest Management Regulatory Agency June 3, 2009

MRL Harmonization: Is it possible? Lois A. Rossi Rossi Regulatory Consulting Group ACS Annual Meeting Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 24, 2016

Updates from the EPA Office of Pesticide Programs 2014 IR-4 Food Use Workshop September 9, 2014

! International Involvements " International goals of OPP " Opportunities to affect international MRLs

Outline. Why IR 4 remains relevant Accomplishments What keeps me up at night Future

IR-4 Program Residue Programs, Databases, Tolerance Petitions. Daniel Kunkel IR-4 Headquarters Associate Director

Registration of Crop Protection Chemicals for Specialty Crops. Michelle Samuel-Foo, PhD IR-4 Southern Region Coordinator University of Florida.

Foreign Agricultural Service Update United States Department of Agriculture

Pesticide Safety Insecticides Update, Bee Toxicity and Management Decisions

and data sharing Daniel Kunkel

MRL Harmonization. Group C

Registrants Role in Trade; Ensuring Export Market Maximum Residue Levels

U.S. EPA Minor Use Program. Dan Rosenblatt, Deputy Director Registration Division U.S. EPA Office of Pesticide Programs

Pacific Rim MRL Issues

IR-4 Transitions Technology

Why Representative Commodities for. Commodity Groups Is Important to Minor Crops

Source: USDA FAS. The U.S. is the world s top exporter of food and agricultural products.

Pesticide Registration Review Program Update

IR-4 and Growers. Partners in Agriculture Year-End-Summary

Canada Regulatory and MRL Overview

Biopesticides in the United States

2011 Year End Summary. Clear Advances in Uncertain Times

Canadian MRL update" Pierre Petelle June 19, 2014"

What can I do as an IR-4 State Liaison Representative to become engaged in the Biopesticide Program?

Keeping the Good Food, Good.

Harmonized Approaches to Crop Protection for Minor Uses: Past, Present, and Future. Daniel Kunkel, Ph.D, Associate Director, IR-4 Program

Global Minor Use Summit

Restructuring of the IR-4 Biopesticide Grant Program

Global Minor-Use Summit

THE GLOBAL MINOR USE SUMMIT ROME, ITALY DEC, 3-7, 2007

Importance of minor uses for the chemical industry and initiatives

The Regulatory Environment: Can t Live With It, Can t Ignore It.

NEWS Release For Immediate Release Contact: Sherrilynn Novack IR-4 PR/Communication Manager

Overview of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug Research & Extension Programs

US EPA Perspectives on Harmonization of International MRLS

Maximum Residue Limit for Pesticides Overview

The IR-4 Program for Registration of Biopesticides

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE: Building Partnerships and a Network with the Pesticide Industry

Biopesticide Market and Opportunities in the North American. Michael Braverman Manager, Biopesticide Program IR-4 Project Rutgers University

Food Program. EPA also codified updates to the stone fruit and tree nut crop groups.

Canadian MRL Activities

IR-4 NOMINATION REPORT Entomology Efficacy/Crop Safety (E/CS) Data Requirements Only

Biopesticide Market and Opportunities in. Manager, Biopesticide Program IR-4 Project Rutgers University

Proposed Maximum Residue Limit. Cypermethrin

Benefits of Crop Protection Products on Society and Agriculture

Trends in Pesticide Regulation; Collaborative Capacity Building; and the Global Minor Use Foundation

Assessment of the IR-4 Organization (AIR4O) An Overview of

Report on South Korea and Taiwan Import MRL Workshops, February 2017

Biotechnology and USDA. Welcome! BRS Stakeholder Meeting November 20, 2013

Pesticide Residue Analysis and Global MRL Compliance Patrick Brennan

Global Residues & MRL s Harmonization

Report of the Second Global Minor Use Summit FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, Rome, Italy February 21-23, 2012

Arcadia Biosciences. NobleConXV January 2019

Almond Board of California. Gabriele Ludwig Ph.D 2018 MRL Harmonization Workshop

Protectionist View Impacts on American Agriculture VERONICA NIGH AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION 11/13/2018

Characterizing U.S. Fruit and Vegetable Production

Introduction: Background:

A Letter from NCGA. In 2015, America s corn farmers showed exactly how amazing. the world of maize can be. Their ability to consistently

Pesticides and Pollinators. Gary Fish Maine Board of Pesticides Control 28 SHS Augusta, ME

Photo Source: CrystalGraphics.com. Bee Aware! How Pesticide Applicators Can Protect Bees from Pesticide Poisoning.

U.S. Agricultural Trade: Trends, Composition, Direction, and Policy

2012 Full Year Results. Media presentation

The Challenges of Securing Import. Minor Crops. John Hallagan. American Spice Trade Association MRL Harmonization Workshop 1 June 2017 San Francisco

Table 1. U.S. Agricultural Exports as a Share of Production, 1992

Early-season flooding for insect pest control

Background on U.S. Agricultural Policy: Food Security Objectives and Trade Implications

Moth Mania. Select lepidopteran pests in red raspberry and blueberry. Beverly Gerdeman and G. H. Spitler WSU NWREC Mount Vernon, WA 98221

Paul van Westendorp Provincial Apiculturist B.C. Ministry of Agriculture

PROJECT: STDF/PG/ 436 LATIN AMERICA PESTICIDE RESIDUE DATA GENERATION PROJECT

Minor uses and specialty crops: the voice of European farmers and their cooperatives

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP): The Vision for Global Pesticide Reviews

Institute of Ag Professionals

North American International Harmonization Efforts for Pesticides: an update on current status and activities

EQIP and IPM for Specialty Crop Growers. Rick Foster IPM Coordinator Purdue University

The Economic Impact of the IR-4 Project and Programs

The Economic Impact of the IR-4 Project and Programs

252 nd American Chemical Society National Meeting and Exposition

Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) and the Effects of it on the Canadian Agriculture Sector

Pulse Growers Perspective on MRLs 2016 International Year of Pulses. Gord Kurbis Director, Market Access and Trade Policy 2016 ACS

SEEDTREATMENT IN VEGETABLES CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES. Rene Huijsmans (Syngenta Seedcare Lead BNL)

I would like to start by thanking the chairman and the ranking member for the opportunity to testify.

Exporter Overview: Regulations Keep on Coming. Julie Adams, ABC (Moderator) Gabriele Ludwig, ABC Sue Olson, ABC

A brief focus on Georgia s agricultural industry

2012 Farm Outlook. Highlights

GROUNDWATER PROTECTION REGULATIONS AND ZONE II IN 2006

Concepts of Integrated Pest Management for Ornamentals and Turf

Trends. in retail. Issue 9 Spring Canada and Alberta food trade with the U.S. on the eve of NAFTA renegotiations. Content

MINOR USE. The Perspective of the Crop Protection Industry. Dan Quinn Policy Manager Minor Use

Rodman & Renshaw 20 th Annual Global Investment Conference. September 5, 2018

NE BMSB Update for George C. Hamilton Department of Entomology Rutgers University

Seed Treatment Update: Canada

Transcription:

IRM in Specialty Crops The Role of IR-4 Dr. Keith Dorschner Entomology Program Manager IR-4 Project Headquarters Rutgers University

IR-4 Project Mission Statement To Facilitate Registration of Sustainable Pest Management Technology for Specialty Crops and Minor Uses

Specialty Crops Include: Most: Vegetables Fruits Nuts Herbs Spices Floral Nursery Landscape Christmas trees

Other Crop Customers Minor Uses on Major Crops Corn, Soybean, Cotton, Rice, Turf, Forestry Crops for Processing Sweet corn, tomato products, legumes, etc,.

Current IR-4 Project Activities Food Crop Registration Program Crop Grouping Enhancements Biopesticide and Organic Support Program International Harmonization of Crop Grouping, MRL s and Registrations

IR-4 Food Crop Program The original IR-4 Project objective (Flagship Program) 80% of the Project s efforts and resources Focus work with reduced risk products Predominantly residue testing, future involves more Value research

The Food Use Program Process Stakeholder: Define Pest Problem Identify Pest Management Solution Request Assistance from IR-4 The Process Starts with Requests Submitted from: Growers, Grower Groups, State/Federal Research & Extension Personnel Request Reviewed by Manufacturer Requests Prioritized Top Priority Researched That Year Second Priorities Researched as (Money Allows) Field and Lab Research Risk Assessment Measure Residue levels in Crop/Crop Group Top Priorities completed in 30 months Manufacturer Adds Crop to the Product Label

IR-4 Project Infrastructure IR-4 HQ IR-4 Regional Program Office State Satellite Labs State Field Research Centers/Food Use State Field Research Centers/ Ornamentals and Non-food Use ARS Labs ARS Field Research Centers ARS Field Research Centers ARS Field Research Centers Hawaii =

Who Pays for IR-4? Direct Contributions Over $18 million USDA-CSREES $12,180,000 USDA-ARS $ 4,000,000 USDA-ARS/DoD $ 250,000 USDA-FAS $ 250,000 State Ag. Exp. Stations $ 481,182 Grants from Industry $ 1,100,000 Indirect Contributions At least $18 million

IR-4 Fills the Grower s Tool Box

Specialty Crops Before IR-4..

Specialty Crops After IR-4!!

Or maybe

IR-4 Food Use Registrations 1110 1014 991 999 793 567 564 538 647 212 281

Crop Grouping Efforts Crop Groups - allow for extrapolation of data from a few crops to many, efficient use of resources. Recent enhancements include: Berries & Small Fruit (45 commodities) Bulb Vegetable (26 commodities) Edible Fungi (20 commodities)

Cranberry weevil

Cranberry Weevil Main chemical management tool had been CHLORPYRIFOS for many years. Growers began experiencing control problems in the late 1990 s. Resistance to chlorpyrifos was identified. Resistance took off in 2001 and 2002. Spring flooding was used to set back the pest but practice potentially lowers yield and control is poor. Alternative chemical controls were desperately needed.

Cranberry Weevil INDOXACARB and THIAMETHOXAM Identified as Solutions Thiamethoxam: First solution identified. IR-4 study initiated in 2000 (field trials in MA, NJ, OR, and WI. EPA grants full registration in May, 2005. Used mainly in summer against first generation weevils. Indoxacarb: Needed as a IRM partner for thiamethoxam. IR-4 responded in 2002 with two field trials in MA. Provided data to support a MA Section 18 in 2003 while IR-4 completed data requirements for a national label (fully registered in 2007). Extensively used in May to control overwintering weevils. Effective product well-liked by growers.

Sparganothis Fruitworm in Cranberry

Sparganothis Fruitworm in Cranberry Again, CHLORPYRIFOS had been the tool of choice for many years with resistance developing in the mid 1990 s. UMASS researchers scrambled for solutions and identified tebufenozide (first MAC insecticide). IR-4 study in 1996, full label 4/99. The first joint project with Canada! Spinosad also identified as a solution by researchers. IR-4 joint study with Canada in 1998, full label 2/02. Second generation MAC insecticide methoxyfenozide found to be superior to tebufenozide. IR-4 study in 1999, full label in 11/03. Also a joint project with Canada. Both MACs still used by growers. Indoxacarb also very useful (IR-4 study 2002/2003, full label 6/08). Acetamiprid labeled in 6/08 as a result of IR-4 Crop Grouping. Spinetoram ( second generation spinosad) recently registered based upon IR-4 spinosad data.

Sparganothis Fruitworm in Cranberry: Projects In-Progress IR-4 Continues to fill the tool box for cranberry growers. Clothianidin: 2005 study, tolerance proposed 4/09. Chlorantraniliprole: 2007 joint IR-4 study with Canada). Data already submitted, registration in review at EPA/PMRA. Dinotefuran: 2008 IR-4 study. Cyantraniliprole: 2009 NAFTA study.

Biopesticide and Organic Support Program 10% of the Project s efforts and resources Registration support and grants program for efficacy data Focus work with integration of biopesticide into conventional systems Support for organic markets Plant incorporated protectants

Varroa Mite in Honeybee Varroa Mite Resistance to Coumaphos Thymol: IR-4 supported a Section 18 and submitted for full registration. Sucrose Octanoate: IR-4 submitted for full registration. IR-4 established tolerance requirement exemptions for both of these materials, which are now fully registered.

Poplar Clearwing Moth Pheromone 4:1 ratio of (E,Z):(Z,Z)-3,13-octadecadienyl straight-chain 18 carbon alcohols A pest of hybrid poplar trees, the clearwing moth had become resistant to chlorpyrifos. IR-4 Biopesticide and Organic Support Program funded efficacy studies which supported full registration of these molecules.

IR-4 International Activities

Global Harmonization IR-4 was established as a domestic program, Why involved in Global Harmonization? IR-4 has provided domestic growers with access to numerous new pest management tools. These are OK to use if crop sold in US. Often significant problems if produce is exported. Growers forced to use older pest management tools. This is a serious issue to many commodity groups

NAFTA Win-Win Model Cooperative research with Canada started in 1996 Mutual projects conducted jointly on both sides of the border - reduced data needs of each country Supported by EPA/PMRA joint reviews and workshare Major funding and expansion for Canada s Pest Management Centre in 2003

IR-4 Global Leadership Harmonization of Crop Groups NAFTA Codex Global Minor Use Summit Pilot Global Residue Study/Zoning

Other Global Activities Provide data to Japan, EU, Taiwan, China, JMPR/Codex CCPR for MRL establishment Assist other minor use programs (Australia, Latin/South America, EU, India, China, Africa)

Thank You! Keith Dorschner: dorschner@aesop.rutgers.edu (732) 932-9575 ext 4615